Blog

  • Meghan Markle Is Often Compared To Grace Kelly — Main Similarities & Differences Between The Two

    Meghan Markle Is Often Compared To Grace Kelly — Main Similarities & Differences Between The Two

    Meghan Markle Is Often Compared To Grace Kelly — Main Similarities & Differences Between The Two

    Meghan Markle Is Often Compared To Grace Kelly — Main Similarities & Differences Between The Two

    Meghan Markle’s story can seem like a fairytale at times — a famous actress meets a prince and they marry and start a family. Best known for her role as Rachel Zane in “Suits,” in which she appeared for seven seasons out of the show’s total nine, Markle also had a wide-ranging career outside of acting, which included everything from fashion to calligraphy and even being a lifestyle influencer. After it was confirmed she and Prince Harry were engaged, Markle announced her retirement from acting in order to focus on being a full-time member of the royal family.

     

     

     

    But while her story is certainly a fairytale romance of our generation, Markle is not the first woman to lead such a life. Back in the 1950s American actress, Grace Kelly had a very similar story. Considered one of Hollywood’s greats, Kelly had an incredibly short career for a film star, working for only six years. However, she was very prolific during that time, appearing in over a dozen movies and winning an Academy Award and Golden Globe.

    After dominating Hollywood in her short acting career, Kelly met Prince Rainier III of Monaco while at the Cannes Film Festival in 1955. Swept off her feet by the charming prince, Kelly chose love instead of her career, quitting Hollywood and becoming Princess of Monaco. Together she and Rainier had three children — Caroline, Princess of Hanover, Albert II, Prince of Monaco, and Princess Stéphanie.

    While Markle has only been a royal family member for a few years, the similarities between her and Kelly are clear. Let’s take a look at how the two are similar as well as different.

    Winning The Hearts Of Real-Life Princes

    Besides sharing the fact that both Meghan Markle and Grace Kelly were famous American actresses who met real-life princes, both of their relationships also started as whirlwind romances that developed quickly.

     

    Considered one of Hollywood’s greats, Kelly had an incredibly short career for a film star, working for only six years. Notable films during her time as an actress include “Mogambo,” which earned her a Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress, and “The Country Girl” which won her an Oscar, also for Best Supporting Actress. Other iconic roles include three Alfred Hitchcock films — “Dial M For Murder,” “Rear Window” and “To Catch a Thief” with Cary Grant. She even portrayed Princess Alexandra in the film “The Swan.”

    While attending the Cannes Film Festival in 1955, Kelly was asked by fellow Hollywood actress Olivia de Havilland if she would be open to meeting Prince Rainier III, a friend of de Havilland’s French husband Pierre Galante. Kelly confirmed she would, provided her film studio, MGM, approved of the meeting during a work trip. After a series of mishaps, Kelly met the prince in his palace in Monaco and the rest as they say is history. De Havilland told People many years later:

    “I guessed things had gone wonderfully well by Grace’s manner upon returning from her presentation to Rainier. … She was in a state of enchantment.”

    Famously, Markle was also set up with her prince on a blind date. After being introduced by a mutual friend, the couple opened up about how their first meeting went during their engagement interview. When asked at what point he knew Markle was the one, Prince Harry replied:

    Kelly’s acting career was famously short, but in that time she’d already managed to make a huge impression on Hollywood, as well as win an Oscar for “The Country Girl.” Some might say that she’d already reached the top of her career in that short time, so perhaps it was easier for her to say goodbye to the glitz and glamor of Hollywood, which she did once she married Rainier in April 1956.

     

    What’s more, not only did Kelly leave the film industry in Hollywood, she also left America, as she relocated to Rainier’s home of Monaco, which is situated on the French Riviera on the Mediterranean Sea. There, the royal couple had their three children.

    While Markle had never even been nominated for an Oscar, she had built herself a solid career in Hollywood, most notably her role on “Suits,” as well as a number of Hallmark movies. After becoming engaged to Harry, Markle left her acting career to become a full-time working royal. However, she makes it clear that she didn’t give anything up but instead made a change.

    Just like Kelly, Markle also became a mother soon after marrying her prince, with Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor born in May 2019 and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor born in June 2021.

    One difference between Kelly and Markle is that the latter didn’t stay a working royal for long, with her and Harry announcing their desire to step away from their roles in early 2020. However, their situations were different, with Rainier ascending the throne, while Harry was only in the line of succession and not expected to become king.

    Humanitarian, Charitable And Fashion Icons

     

    Another similarity between the two former actresses is their dedication to humanitarian causes. Kelly was an advocate of children’s rights and even served as the president of the Red Cross in Monaco.

    On top of being humanitarian icons, Kelly and Markle are also well known for their impeccable sense of style. Kelly was a fashion icon from her acting days, as she always appeared perfectly dressed in gorgeous gowns. She continued her love of fashion by donning local Monaco designers when she was a princess.

    Meanwhile, Markle started a charity organization with Harry named Archewell Foundation, while her charitable work has been evident even before she became a royal. According to its official website, the non-profit foundation was created with the core purpose of uplifting and uniting communities all around the world, locally and globally, “one act of compassion at a time.”

    Also well known for her fashionable outfits, Markle has even dabbled in fashion design and used her former blog The Tig to show off her great taste. Ever since becoming a royal, Markle’s outfits have set trends themselves, as she always looks stunning.

    Similarly, Kelly has also been remembered as a fashion icon known for her stunning elegance. According to Express, both Kelly and Markle have been recognized as trendsetters because of their poignant sense of style.

    Now based in Montecito, California, Markle differs from Kelly in that she moved back to the United States after a few years abroad, but otherwise, the two are more alike than they’re different.

  • ‘Greedy’ Meghan Markle is ‘being laughed out of Hollywood’ by A-listers: source

    ‘Greedy’ Meghan Markle is ‘being laughed out of Hollywood’ by A-listers: source

    ‘Greedy’ Meghan Markle is ‘being laughed out of Hollywood’ by A-listers: source /dn

    Meghan Markle might be one of the most famous women on the planet — but Hollywood power players are purportedly less than impressed with her showbiz prowess.

    The Duchess of Sussex, 42, is said to be scrambling after the launch of her forthcoming podcast with Lemonada Media was reportedly pushed back to next year.

    According to In Touch, honchos at the company put the project on pause for fear that the upcoming launch of her lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard, would take attention away from her audio endeavors.

    “Meghan gets greedy,” an inside source told the publication.

    “She wants everything all at once, and it’s backfiring on her again. She’s become a total joke and is overplaying her hand.”

    is said to be scrambling after the launch of her forthcoming podcast with Lemonada Media was reportedly pushed back to next year.
    is said to be scrambling after the launch of her forthcoming podcast with Lemonada Media was reportedly pushed back to next year.Jack Plunkett/Invision/AP

     

    Markle's Spotify series "Archetypes" was not renewed for a second season.
    Markle’s Spotify series “Archetypes” was not renewed for a second season.Spotify
    Lemonada execs are also allegedly worried that Markle’s upcoming Netflix cooking show will divert attention from the podcast. 

    “That clearly didn’t go down well with Lemonada,” the source stated.

    “They surely expected to be Meghan’s priority project, but she must have decided she had bigger fish to fry with Netflix.”

    The purported pushback of the podcast comes after Markle’s Spotify series “Archetypes” was not renewed for a second season.

    The source says Markle now desperately needs a hit with her Netflix show or her lifestyle brand in order to prove that she and husband Prince Harry are still viable in Hollywood.

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle onstage at the 2021 Global Citizen Live concert in Central Park, New York
    Harry and Meghan are in desperate need of a hit, an insider says.REUTERS
    However, the insider isn’t holding out hope.

    “Almost everything they’ve tried has ended in disaster,” they tartly declared.

    Meanwhile, one well-placed source in Tinseltown told In Touch that A-listers have little respect for the Duchess, who commands big bucks for her content.


    What do you think? Be the first to comment.

    “Hollywood is glam and glitz on the outside, but the real stars have worked hard for their success — and you get the impression hard work isn’t really Meghan’s thing,” the anonymous source says.

    “Now, after all her failures, those A-listers — and the royals — are laughing at her!”

  • Meghan Markle Is Often Compared To Grace Kelly — Main Similarities & Differences Between The Two

    Meghan Markle Is Often Compared To Grace Kelly — Main Similarities & Differences Between The Two

    Meghan Markle Is Often Compared To Grace Kelly — Main Similarities & Differences Between The Two

    Meghan Markle’s story can seem like a fairytale at times — a famous actress meets a prince and they marry and start a family. Best known for her role as Rachel Zane in “Suits,” in which she appeared for seven seasons out of the show’s total nine, Markle also had a wide-ranging career outside of acting, which included everything from fashion to calligraphy and even being a lifestyle influencer. After it was confirmed she and Prince Harry were engaged, Markle announced her retirement from acting in order to focus on being a full-time member of the royal family.

     

     

    But while her story is certainly a fairytale romance of our generation, Markle is not the first woman to lead such a life. Back in the 1950s American actress, Grace Kelly had a very similar story. Considered one of Hollywood’s greats, Kelly had an incredibly short career for a film star, working for only six years. However, she was very prolific during that time, appearing in over a dozen movies and winning an Academy Award and Golden Globe.

    After dominating Hollywood in her short acting career, Kelly met Prince Rainier III of Monaco while at the Cannes Film Festival in 1955. Swept off her feet by the charming prince, Kelly chose love instead of her career, quitting Hollywood and becoming Princess of Monaco. Together she and Rainier had three children — Caroline, Princess of Hanover, Albert II, Prince of Monaco, and Princess Stéphanie.

    While Markle has only been a royal family member for a few years, the similarities between her and Kelly are clear. Let’s take a look at how the two are similar as well as different.

    Winning The Hearts Of Real-Life Princes

    Besides sharing the fact that both Meghan Markle and Grace Kelly were famous American actresses who met real-life princes, both of their relationships also started as whirlwind romances that developed quickly.

    Considered one of Hollywood’s greats, Kelly had an incredibly short career for a film star, working for only six years. Notable films during her time as an actress include “Mogambo,” which earned her a Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress, and “The Country Girl” which won her an Oscar, also for Best Supporting Actress. Other iconic roles include three Alfred Hitchcock films — “Dial M For Murder,” “Rear Window” and “To Catch a Thief” with Cary Grant. She even portrayed Princess Alexandra in the film “The Swan.”

    While attending the Cannes Film Festival in 1955, Kelly was asked by fellow Hollywood actress Olivia de Havilland if she would be open to meeting Prince Rainier III, a friend of de Havilland’s French husband Pierre Galante. Kelly confirmed she would, provided her film studio, MGM, approved of the meeting during a work trip. After a series of mishaps, Kelly met the prince in his palace in Monaco and the rest as they say is history. De Havilland told People many years later:

    “I guessed things had gone wonderfully well by Grace’s manner upon returning from her presentation to Rainier. … She was in a state of enchantment.”

    Famously, Markle was also set up with her prince on a blind date. After being introduced by a mutual friend, the couple opened up about how their first meeting went during their engagement interview. When asked at what point he knew Markle was the one, Prince Harry replied:

    Kelly’s acting career was famously short, but in that time she’d already managed to make a huge impression on Hollywood, as well as win an Oscar for “The Country Girl.” Some might say that she’d already reached the top of her career in that short time, so perhaps it was easier for her to say goodbye to the glitz and glamor of Hollywood, which she did once she married Rainier in April 1956.

    What’s more, not only did Kelly leave the film industry in Hollywood, she also left America, as she relocated to Rainier’s home of Monaco, which is situated on the French Riviera on the Mediterranean Sea. There, the royal couple had their three children.

    While Markle had never even been nominated for an Oscar, she had built herself a solid career in Hollywood, most notably her role on “Suits,” as well as a number of Hallmark movies. After becoming engaged to Harry, Markle left her acting career to become a full-time working royal. However, she makes it clear that she didn’t give anything up but instead made a change.

    Just like Kelly, Markle also became a mother soon after marrying her prince, with Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor born in May 2019 and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor born in June 2021.

    One difference between Kelly and Markle is that the latter didn’t stay a working royal for long, with her and Harry announcing their desire to step away from their roles in early 2020. However, their situations were different, with Rainier ascending the throne, while Harry was only in the line of succession and not expected to become king.

    Humanitarian, Charitable And Fashion Icons

    Another similarity between the two former actresses is their dedication to humanitarian causes. Kelly was an advocate of children’s rights and even served as the president of the Red Cross in Monaco.

    On top of being humanitarian icons, Kelly and Markle are also well known for their impeccable sense of style. Kelly was a fashion icon from her acting days, as she always appeared perfectly dressed in gorgeous gowns. She continued her love of fashion by donning local Monaco designers when she was a princess.

    Meanwhile, Markle started a charity organization with Harry named Archewell Foundation, while her charitable work has been evident even before she became a royal. According to its official website, the non-profit foundation was created with the core purpose of uplifting and uniting communities all around the world, locally and globally, “one act of compassion at a time.”

    Also well known for her fashionable outfits, Markle has even dabbled in fashion design and used her former blog The Tig to show off her great taste. Ever since becoming a royal, Markle’s outfits have set trends themselves, as she always looks stunning.

    Similarly, Kelly has also been remembered as a fashion icon known for her stunning elegance. According to Express, both Kelly and Markle have been recognized as trendsetters because of their poignant sense of style.

    Now based in Montecito, California, Markle differs from Kelly in that she moved back to the United States after a few years abroad, but otherwise, the two are more alike than they’re different.

  • Unbelievable! Prince William and Kate Middleton have obtained the DNA tests of Lilibet and Archie while Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are occupied with their tour in Colombia.

    Unbelievable! Prince William and Kate Middleton have obtained the DNA tests of Lilibet and Archie while Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are occupied with their tour in Colombia.

    Unbelievable! Prince William and Kate Middleton have obtained the DNA tests of Lilibet and Archie while Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are occupied with their tour in Colombia.

    Kate Middleton once revealed how a sweet gesture to son Prince George ended in disaster when she tried to pick up a new skill.

    Congratulations: Prince William And Kate Middleton we’re Overwhelmed And Joyfully Announced The DNA Test Results For Lilibet: “She Is The Child Of… See More

    The Princess of Wales is well-known for being a very involved mum, devoting all of her time out with her royal duties to children.

    So what was it that she tried to learn? Well, it turns out it was knitting. Kate first revealed she was trying her hand at knitting way back in 2013 when she was pregnant with George.

    In 2020, during a trip to Bradford, Kate visited Older Yet Wiser – an organisation that supports grandparents – and met with some grandmothers who were showing off their crocheting skills.

    And there she confessed that her attempts to knit George a jumper had completely failed.

    Kate Middleton’s attempt at knitting a jumper for Prince George may have ended in disaster, but it’s clear that her dedication to trying new things knows no bounds. The Duchess of Cambridge is constantly striving to learn and improve, whether it’s in her royal duties or in her personal life.Knitting may not have been Kate’s forte, but her willingness to step out of her comfort zone and try something new is truly commendable. It’s a reminder that even those in the spotlight face challenges and setbacks, but it’s important to persevere and keep on learning.As a mother, Kate’s commitment to her children is unwavering. She may not have been successful in her knitting endeavors, but her love and devotion to her family shines through in everything she does. The Princess of Wales is a shining example of balancing royal duties with being a hands-on mom.So the next time you find yourself facing a challenge or trying something new, remember Kate Middleton’s knitting mishap. It’s okay to stumble and make mistakes, but what truly matters is the effort and determination you put into everything you do. Keep on learning, keep on growing, and who knows what you might be able to achieve.

    The Duchess of Cambridge, Kate Middleton, is no stranger to trying new things and stepping out of her comfort zone. One particular instance that comes to mind is when she decided to take up skiing. Despite being a beginner, Kate was determined to improve her skills on the slopes. She even enrolled in ski lessons to gain more confidence on the snow.While Kate’s initial attempts at skiing were met with some falls and tumbles, she never gave up. Through perseverance and dedication, the Duchess was able to master the basics of skiing and eventually tackled more challenging slopes. Her positive attitude and willingness to learn from her mistakes are truly inspiring.Kate Middleton’s journey with skiing serves as a reminder that it’s important to embrace new experiences and not be afraid to fail. Even in the face of setbacks, Kate’s determination to improve and grow as a person shines through. Her adventurous spirit and commitment to self-improvement are qualities that we can all aspire to emulate.As we navigate through life’s challenges and obstacles, let us remember Kate Middleton’s skiing adventure. It’s a testament to the fact that with hard work and perseverance, we can overcome any hurdle that comes our way. So the next time you find yourself hesitating to try something new, think of Kate Middleton’s skiing journey and take that leap of faith. You never know what amazing things you might achieve.

  • NEW TITLES! Lady Louise & James Wessex REPLACE Meghan & Harry By Order Of King Charles: My FAVORITE

    NEW TITLES! Lady Louise & James Wessex REPLACE Meghan & Harry By Order Of King Charles: My FAVORITE

    NEW TITLES! Lady Louise & James Wessex REPLACE Meghan & Harry By Order Of King Charles: My FAVORITE

    As you can see from today’s headline, there have been some major changes happening within the British monarchy.

    It’s no secret that since stepping back from their royal duties in 2020, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s relationship with the royal family has been strained. Their explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey last year where they accused an unnamed royal of racist remarks really seemed to damage ties. They’ve since moved to California and settled into life outside of the Firm.

    However, according to inside sources, King Charles is not at all pleased with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s ongoing commentary about the royals from across the pond. While they say they want privacy, they certainly don’t keep a low profile! Harry’s upcoming memoir also has the palace on edge, with fears it may contain damaging allegations.

    So in a surprising move, King Charles has issued a royal directive that effectively replaces Harry and Meghan as the public faces of the younger generation of the monarchy. Taking over their prior roles and responsibilities will be none other than the King’s own nephew, Viscount Severn James Wessex, and his wife Lady Louise.

  • Heartbreaking Princess Catherine update confirms what we suspected

    Heartbreaking Princess Catherine update confirms what we suspected

    Heartbreaking Princess Catherine update confirms what we suspected

    All About Princess Catherine’s Stunning Sapphire Engagement Ring (and the Royal Heirloom It Was Inspired By!)

    There’s a lot of history behind the ring Prince William proposed to Kate Middleton with

    Catherine, Princess of Wales arrives at the Shaping Us National Symposium at the Design Museum on November 15, 2023 in London, England.

    Kate Middleton; Kate Middleton’s engagement ring. Photo: Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty

    Kate Middleton’s engagement ring is undeniably one of the most famous pieces of jewelry in the world.

    Having first belonged to Princess Diana, the blue sapphire and diamond ring has been circulating on the royal scene since 1981, when the future King Charles proposed to Diana with it.

    Though there’s some debate over exactly how the sapphire bauble made its way into the royal family (the jewelry company that made it, Garrard, claims Prince Charles chose it for his young bride because it reminded him of his mother’s own sapphire brooch while others say Diana ordered it from the company’s catalog or chose it from a spread of jewels that Charles presented her with), it’s been in Kate’s possession since 2010, when Prince William used it to ask for her hand in marriage.

    “It’s my mother’s engagement ring, so I thought it was quite nice because obviously, she’s not going to be around to share in any of the fun and excitement of all this,” Prince William said in his engagement interview with Kate. “This is my way of keeping her sort of close to it all.”

    He also told reporters of the piece: “It’s very special to me. As Kate’s very special to me now, it was right to put the two together.”

    And while Princess Kate’s ring is certainly unique, she isn’t the first British royal to wear a sapphire stone on her left finger. Aside from her late mother-in-law Princess Diana, Queen Elizabeth’s mother, the Queen Mother, received a sapphire engagement ring from King George VI in 1923. Princess Anne also wears a sapphire engagement ring from her husband, Timothy Laurence.

    The ring features a 12-carat sapphire center stone

    Kate Middleton, wearing her engagement ring

    The Princess of Wales’ engagement ring boasts a huge oval Ceylon sapphire that weighs 12 carats. The blue stone is surrounded by 14 solitaire diamonds and set in 18-karat white gold.

    It was inspired by another famous royal jewel

    The Queen In Saudi Arabia Wearing A Turban Hat During Her Visit To The Gulf State

    According to jewelry company Garrard, who crafted the family heirloom, its design was inspired by another famous piece in the royal collection: a sapphire-and-diamond brooch that was commissioned by Prince Albert in 1840 for his then-fiancée, Queen Victoria. Not only did Queen Victoria adore it (“She found she loved it so much that she decided to wear it on her wedding day as her something blue on the front of her dress,” Garrard’s creative director, Sara Prentice, told Vogue in 2017), it now belongs in the crown heirloom collection and was reportedly a favorite of Queen Elizabeth, who wore it to meet President John F. Kennedy in 1961.

     

    Kate’s ring originally belonged to Princess Diana

    Lady Diana Spencer Reveals Her Sapphire And Diamond Engagement Ring While She And Prince Charles Pose For Photographs In The Grounds Of Buckingham Palace Following The Announcement Of Their Engagement

    Long before the ring adorned Kate’s finger, it was worn by Princess Diana.

    The ring was reportedly one of several pieces that Charles presented Diana with at Windsor Castle ahead of his proposal, and he chose to include it because it resembled Queen Elizabeth’s sapphire brooch.

    The company’s creative director, Prentice, told Vogue, “It was said to be a strong influence on Prince Charles when he came to Garrard to purchase a ring for Lady Diana. He actually ended up setting a sapphire cluster ring for her … I would imagine growing up being surrounded by your mother and your grandmother [with] such beautiful, incredible jewelry … it would stick with you.”

    When Charles proposed to Diana with the ring in 1981, the jewel was priced at $37,500, though its value has increased significantly in the decades since.

     

    Kate debuted her blue engagement ring with a matching dress

    Prince William and Kate Middleton pose for photographs in the State Apartments of St James Palace on November 16, 2010 in London, England

    Royal admirers first saw the sapphire and diamond ring on Kate’s hand during the couple’s engagement announcement at St. James’s Palace on Nov. 16, 2010. Kate had the perfect ensemble to show it off in: a royal blue Issa dress with a V-neckline and a crossover waistband.

    Her gold wedding band was a gift from Queen Elizabeth

    Duchess of Cambridge during a one day visit to Luxembourg at Drai Eechelen Museum on May 11, 2017 in Luxembourg, Luxembourg

    The blue ring got some company on Kate’s finger on her and William’s wedding day on April 29, 2011, when Queen Elizabeth gifted the bride with a Wartski Welsh gold wedding band. Welsh gold bands are a long-standing tradition for the royal family: King Charles and Queen Camilla received similar wedding rings in 2005.

     

    Kate has matching jewels for her engagement ring

    Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge travels down The Mall in a horse drawn carriage during Trooping the Colour on June 2, 2022 in London, England. Trooping The Colour, also known as The Queen's Birthday Parade, is a military ceremony performed by regiments of the British Army that has taken place since the mid-17th century. It marks the official birthday of the British Sovereign. This year, from June 2 to June 5, 2022, there is the added celebration of the Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II in the UK and Commonwealth to mark the 70th anniversary of her accession to the throne on 6 February 1952

    While Kate’s ring is stunning enough to make a statement on its own, the Princess of Wales also has some matching pieces she has worn on occasion, which were from Princess Diana’s personal jewelry collection.

    In 2019, Princess Kate debuted a large pair of double-cluster sapphire-and-diamond earrings that once belonged to Diana. The late princess was photographed wearing the jewels many times, including at the Met Gala in New York in 1996.

     

    Prince William gifted Kate an eternity ring after Prince George’s birth

    Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge (ring detail) attends the ICAP charity day at ICAP on December 9, 2015 in London, England

    Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty

    Three years after the couple got engaged, Kate’s show-stopping engagement ring and Welsh gold wedding band got even flashier with the addition of a white gold diamond eternity band that Prince William gifted her from Annoushka.

  • Lionel Messi’s family life was once very difficult, and then David Beckham appeared with a lucrative contract to save the Messi family (video)

    Lionel Messi’s family life was once very difficult, and then David Beckham appeared with a lucrative contract to save the Messi family (video)

    Star football Lionel Messi has been making headlines ever since he moved to the United States and signed a contract with David Beckham’s Inter Miami.

    His switch shed new light on soccer in America and has brought in hundreds of new fans into the sport, Mirror reported.

    It’s been a year since La Pulga moved to the US, however, the player has barely explored the area he lives in.

    The eight-time Ballon d’Or winner lives in a luxury $10.75 million Fort Lauderdale mansion in Miami, which is situated inside a gated family home community.

    The two-story house has 10 bedrooms, nine bathrooms, a powder room, and two docks.

    With a house like that, who would want to go out? In an interview with an Argentinian publication,

    Infobae, the former Barcelona player shared that he and his wife don’t go out a lot in the US.

    He said: “No, the truth is that we don’t go out much. We live in the area where the club is located.”

    He added: “We go out, we’ve gone out a couple of times, but I still don’t know it well.”

    Messi has such a huge following in the US that every time he goes out, he gets swamped by fans. The 36-year-old player has been seen going out for dinners with franchise owner and former soccer player David Beckham.
    Messi’s arrival in the US has not only sparked excitement among soccer fans but has also had a positive impact on the sport’s popularity in the country. Despite living in a lavish mansion in Fort Lauderdale, Messi and his wife prefer to stay close to their club’s location and have not explored much of the area. The couple rarely goes out, preferring to maintain a low profile and avoid the crowds of fans that flock to see the soccer star whenever he steps out in public. In fact, Messi has admitted in an interview that they have only ventured out a few times since moving to the US and that they are still unfamiliar with the region.The luxury lifestyle that Messi leads in Miami is a far cry from his humble beginnings in Argentina. The soccer legend’s rise to fame and fortune is a testament to his hard work, dedication, and talent on the field. Despite his success, Messi remains grounded and focused on his career, constantly striving to improve and achieve new heights in the sport. His move to the US has opened up new opportunities for him, both professionally and personally, and he is grateful for the support and admiration of his fans.As Messi continues to make a name for himself in the US, it is clear that his impact on American soccer will be long-lasting. His presence has already brought a new level of excitement and energy to the sport, attracting a diverse and passionate fan base that is eager to see him in action. Whether he is on the field scoring goals or off the field spending time with his family, Messi’s influence is undeniable. Stay tuned for more updates on Messi’s journey in the US and his contributions to the world of soccer.

  • “He’s just a pawn on my father’s chessboard”: Prince Harry speaks out as King Charles honors David Beckham (video)

    “He’s just a pawn on my father’s chessboard”: Prince Harry speaks out as King Charles honors David Beckham (video)

    Prince Harry has finally broken silence after his father King Charles appointed his former friend David Beckham the ambassador of The King’s Foundation.

    The former football legend has also expressed his excitement after King Charles honoured him.

    In a statement, David Beckham says, “I’m excited to be working with The King’s Foundation and to have the opportunity to help raise awareness of the charity’s work.”

    Now, according to a report by Woman’s Day, Archie and Lilibet doting father is said to be fuming over the Beckham and King Charles cosy new friendship.

    The publication quoted an insider as claiming, “Harry’s head has been spinning since he saw those photos. He can’t help but feel jealous – and betrayed.”

    The source further said, “David was his friend not so long ago, so it’s a double blow to see him being friendly

    with his dad and taking an ambassadorship role that should have been for him.”

    “Clearly there’s genuine affection between Charles and David but this will deeply upset Harry, who is still smarting over his father’s snub when he was in London just weeks ago.”

    The Woman’s Day published the report with title “Prince Harry tells King Charles, ‘David’s not your son!’”
    Prince Harry has recently made headlines again, this time for his response to his father’s decision to appoint David Beckham as the ambassador of The King’s Foundation. Despite his public support for charitable endeavors, it seems that this particular decision has left Prince Harry feeling a mix of jealousy and betrayal. According to a report by Woman’s Day, the sight of his father and former friend bonding over their shared philanthropic work has left Prince Harry feeling as though he has been snubbed. A source quoted in the publication revealed that Harry’s emotions are running high, with feelings of jealousy and betrayal taking center stage. Seeing David Beckham take on a role that could have been his has only added to his frustration. The source also added that while there is clearly a genuine connection between King Charles and David Beckham, Prince Harry is deeply upset by the situation. Despite his efforts to support charitable causes and make a positive impact, it seems that he believes he has been overlooked in favor of his father’s new friendship. As the drama unfolds, it remains to be seen how Prince Harry will navigate his feelings of jealousy and betrayal. With tensions running high, it is clear that this situation has struck a nerve with him. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story. Thank you for following along and supporting us as we bring you the latest news and insights. Your continued support motivates us to keep providing you with valuable information. Source: Los Angeles Times
    Prince Harry’s response to his father’s decision regarding David Beckham’s appointment as ambassador for The King’s Foundation has caused quite a stir in the royal circle. Reports suggest that Prince Harry is feeling a combination of jealousy and betrayal over the cozy new friendship between King Charles and Beckham. The insider revealed to Woman’s Day that seeing his father and former friend bonding over philanthropic work has left Prince Harry feeling snubbed and overlooked. The decision to appoint Beckham to a role that Prince Harry believed should have been his own has only added to his frustration.Despite Prince Harry’s ongoing efforts to support charitable causes and make a positive impact, it seems that this particular decision has struck a nerve. The genuine connection between King Charles and David Beckham has only deepened Prince Harry’s sense of disappointment. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how Prince Harry will navigate his complex emotions of jealousy and betrayal.Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story as we continue to provide you with valuable insights and information. Your support and feedback are greatly appreciated as we strive to keep you informed and engaged. Source: Los Angeles Times.

  • What happened at the Spice Girls reunion that Victoria Beckham couldn’t handle alone and had to rely on Beckham’s assistance? (video)

    What happened at the Spice Girls reunion that Victoria Beckham couldn’t handle alone and had to rely on Beckham’s assistance? (video)

    The girls are back in town! On April 20, Victoria Beckham celebrated her 50th birthday with a Spice Girls reunion—but we’re the ones who received a gift.

    In a video shared on her Instagram grid, Victoria, Geri Halliwell-Turner, Emma Bunton, Melanie “Mel C” Chisholm, and Melanie “Mel B” Brown channeled Posh, Ginger, Baby,

    Sporty, and Scary Spice for a surprise dance performance of their hit song “Stop”—and yes, they still know the choreography from the iconic 1997 music video.

    The women were perfectly in sync as the pop jam played in the background and David Beckham recorded the moment gleefully.

    “Best night ever! Happy Birthday to me,” she captioned the clip from her birthday party in London. “I love you all so much! #SpiceUpYourLife.”

    The fun didn’t end there. Following the party, David Beckham was photographed carrying his wife out of Oswald’s on his back,

    a rare smile on Posh Spice’s face. Clearly, the night was a roaring success.

    Victoria Beckham’s birthday clip comes nearly two years after Victoria Beckham serenaded her husband with the same banger during a karaoke night in July 2022. “Karaoke night with the one & only Posh Spice 🖤,” he captioned the video at the time, to which Victoria replied, “Only for you David!! X”

    The Spice Girls took the world by storm between 1994 and 2000, churning out hit bops like “Wannabe,” “Spice Up Your Life,” and “2 Become 1” before going on their “indefinite hiatus in the literal Y2K.” Now, it seems we’re inching closer and closer to the Spice Girls reunion project we’ve been hoping for since the band toured in 2019 without Posh.… Now we just have to get them singing and dancing at the same time.

    Following Victoria’s birthday party, Scary Spice herself shared the clip to her Instagram Story with the hashtag, “tourdatescomingsoon.” Quick, someone get that guy who makes dresses on TikTok to update Ginger Spice’s Union Jack dress.

    When she’s not writing about all-things Hollywood for Glamour, Emily Tannenbaum is a screenwriter, editor, and Tomatometer-approved critic with work published in Elle, Cosmo, Vanity Fair, IGN, and more. Follow her on Twitter @ectannenbaum.
    The Spice Girls reunion was definitely a night to remember! Victoria Beckham’s 50th birthday celebration brought Posh, Ginger, Baby, Sporty, and Scary Spice back together for a surprise dance performance of their hit song “Stop”. The iconic choreography from the 1997 music video was flawlessly executed, showing that the girls still have what it takes to Spice Up Your Life.David Beckham captured the joyful moment on camera, beaming with pride as his wife and her bandmates brought the house down. The birthday festivities continued as David was spotted playfully carrying Victoria out of Oswald’s on his back, a rare sight that proved just how much fun the night was.This reunion comes on the heels of Victoria serenading David with the same hit song during a karaoke night in 2022. The chemistry between the couple and the rest of the Spice Girls is undeniable, sparking rumors of a possible reunion project in the near future. Scary Spice even teased fans with the hashtag “tourdatescomingsoon” on her Instagram Story, leaving us all eagerly anticipating more exciting news.The legacy of the Spice Girls lives on, with their infectious bops like “Wannabe” and “2 Become 1” still holding a special place in fans’ hearts. The possibility of seeing them back together on stage is a dream come true for many, and we can’t wait to see what the future holds for these legendary pop stars. Stay tuned for more updates on this epic reunion!

  • David Beckham’s iconic 1997 interview suddenly goes viral again due to the s.e.n.sitive questions the host asked him, which have now become reality (video)

    David Beckham’s iconic 1997 interview suddenly goes viral again due to the s.e.n.sitive questions the host asked him, which have now become reality (video)

    Netflix’s eagerly awaited documentary series on David Beckham launches today – following last night’s star-studded UK premiere.

    Made up of four hour-long episodes, Beckham explores the life of a global football icon.

    “From his humble working-class beginnings in east London, his drive and determination to win, and the battle to find balance between ambition,

    love and family, David’s story is one of immense ups and downs,” the series’ description reads. “The series takes you on that rollercoaster and builds a surprising,

    personal and definitive story of one of the most recognisable and scrutinised athletes of all time.”

    Academy Award-winner Fisher Stevens (Palmer, And We Go Green, The Cove), along with Academy Award and Emmy Award-winning producer John Battsek (One Day in September,

    Searching for Sugar Man, Winter on Fire), were granted unprecedented access to David, his wife Victoria, his family, his friends and his team-mates for the series.

    Interview: Jonathan O Brien

    AS ALL football fans (not to mention Arsenal supporters) know, Manchester United’s David Beckham is an extravagantly gifted midfielder with one of the best right feet in Europe. In addition to these covetable attributes, on the evidence of my 30 minutes with him he appears to be a friendly, approachable, polite, well-adjusted human being, with not even a hint of the vile arrogance which is a personality trait of so many of his Premiership contemporaries.

    Perhaps at this point I should, as they say, declare a personal interest. It is this: I am a rabid Manchester United fan, have been since the age of seven, and can trace my interest in football right back to the day I watched United playing Brighton in the 1983 FA Cup final. I’ve spent a good percentage of my 21 years on the planet observing the Red Devils in action, and such is the depth of my obsession that up until about four years ago, I had a Manchester United quilt on my bed. It doesn’t get much sadder than that – unless you have a Liverpool quilt on your bed, in which case it’s . . . no, I won’t bother. Slagging the ‘Pool these days is a bit like going after an immobilised hippopotamus with a sniper’s infra-red-sights rifle.

    Consequently, as I spend the hour before this interview writing up my questions in the HP office, I can feel a tight knot of nerves being tied in my stomach. By the time I arrive at the interview location, my hands are shaking. I’ve rarely, if ever, been this nervous and anxious before in my entire life. I am about to have a long chat with not just any old Manchester United player, but one of my all-time heroes, and I am, in short, shitting bricks.

    But David Beckham, as I have already said, is an unimpeachably nice guy, and his friendly demeanour goes a long way to settling my fraught nerves – to such an extent that before the interview proper even starts, I have relaxed completely.

    Now, if only he were as candid as he is amiable. On five separate occasions during our conversation, he employs the words “I don’t really want to talk about that”, or “I’m not going to answer that question”, or variants thereof. And as the phrase “That’s the way football is” emerges from his lips for the third time in as many minutes, a popular analogy involving blood and stones springs nimbly to mind.

    Blame it on fatigue after a hectic day, blame it on natural shyness, blame it on Alex Ferguson’s unnecessarily obsessive shielding of his younger players from the nefarious media, but whatever the cause of it, interviewing David Beckham is a curious experience, involving constant and indiscriminate use of the words “y’know?” and “I dunno”. It’s not even a case of the guy being stupid, as such, or even surly. He isn’t, which makes it all the more perplexing.

    The man known as “Becks” to his team-mates was in Ireland for a publicity photo-call to promote his new advertising contract with Adidas. The piece of paper in question requires him to endorse the Predator Traxion boots, for which he is being paid a presumably ridiculous amount of money. This interview took place in the Burlington Hotel, where he stayed during his brief visit to Dublin.

    I enter the lobby at 7pm on a cold Thursday evening to be greeted by a phalanx of PR people, all of whom are anxious to ensure that our chinwag goes as smoothly as possible. Hot Press had been informed earlier in the day that Beckham wanted to “talk about other things as well as football”, so my list of questions is hastily revised to include queries about the future of the British monarchy, the current social turmoil in Albania, the chances of the Euro-sceptic Referendum Party in the approaching UK election, and Ireland’s poor performances under Brian Ashton in the Five Nations.

    Feeble wit aside, from the outset it’s clear that he isn’t relishing the prospect of another “What’s – it – like – playing – for – Man – United – and – how – do – you – think -you’ll – get – on – against – Porto – on – Wednesday” type of interview, his friendliness notwithstanding. Before we start talking, he collars a passing waiter to order a pot of tea and a tray of biscuits, remembering to say “please” and “thank you” in the process, which is something it’s hard to visualise the likes of Teddy Sheringham doing. I get the feeling that this man won’t be turning up in a Sun sexclusive involving Geri Spice Girl in the near future.

    JONATHAN O’BRIEN: Let’s start from the very beginning. You signed for United in 1988 on apprentice forms, and this involved moving up to Lancashire from Greater London, where you lived. Why United, instead of a team in the capital such as Chelsea or Arsenal?

    DAVID BECKHAM: It was the way they treated me when I first went up to Manchester. It felt like I was in a family. The way it was, was like no other club I’d ever been at. I always supported Man United as a kid, always. It was all to do with the way the manager was with me, the way the coaching staff treated me, same with the players. It was just a great atmosphere. The first week I went there, that was when I knew that I wanted to play for Man United. Me and the Nevilles, Scholesy, Nicky (Butt), John (O’Kane), Chris (Casper), we’ve always been friends, there’s always been a great atmosphere between all the young players and all the older ones. So, as I say, it’s just like a big extended family really.

    While you were making your way up the club ladder, did you experience any serious setbacks along the way – serious injury, failing a trial, things like that?

    I’ve had two bad knockbacks that I can really think of. As regards one of them, looking back now it was really better for me in the long run. One was when I didn’t get in the Lilleshall (FA school of excellence), when I didn’t pass. Not that I would have gone, but it would’ve given me the option to go, and I was upset that I didn’t get into that. And the second knockback – which was quite a big one – was when I played every game in the England under-18 side and when the European Championships came around, I wasn’t picked, when I thought I’d done well enough to be in the team. That was the other one.

    Did there ever come a point where you were convinced you weren’t going to make it as a professional footballer?

    No, thankfully. It’s all gone really smoothly, touch wood (touches his head) so far. I’ve had help throughout my career, and that’s the way it’s been all the way through, so . . .

    As a player, your first real achievement of note was when you scored the second goal in United’s 4-0 victory over Galatasaray in the Champions League in November 1994. Two and a half years on, how do you look back on it?

    I don’t really remember much about it, to be honest. But it was definitely one of the highlights of my career, because it was my first goal for Man United, and to score it in a game like that, with a crowd like that at Old Trafford, and in Europe as well . . . it was brilliant, really.

    That goal happened to be one of your trademark long-range rockets. Have you always had an obsession with scoring from outside the area, or is this a more recent development?

    (Laughs) To be honest, I always used to score quite a few goals like this from outside the area and things like that, when I was playing for our Sunday team. But I’d never had the chance in the first team really to do it. At the time I don’t think I had the confidence, but this season I’ve just been shooting from anywhere really. I’ve not set a task and thought “right, I’m going to practice that today”, I’ve never thought that, y’know. I’ve practiced things in training, but never really practiced shooting from outside the area. We always work on shooting anyway.

    Which players did you look up to as a kid?

    I admired a lot of players. I hadn’t got one favourite. I admired players like Bryan Robson, Glenn Hoddle, Ray Wilkins.

    No foreigners? Platini, Maradona or Stoichkov, perhaps?

    No, not really. Nobody that I can really think of.

    When Andrei Kanchelskis and Paul Ince left the club in the summer of 1995, you were still very much a fringe player. Did you see their departures – particularly that of Kanchelskis – as an indication that you’d be getting an extended run in the team for the first time?

    No, it never even entered my head that I’d be happy about players leaving. I was friendly with Andrei, and I was very good friends with Paul Ince and Mark Hughes as well. And they coached me and helped me a lot through my career up till then, and Paul Ince still does at England level. So does Mark Hughes whenever I see him. They’re brilliant blokes, and I was sad to see them go because, one, they’re great footballers, and two, they were so nice to me. I was well upset when they left.

    After those players left, the first competitive game was the now famous 3-1 defeat at Villa Park on the opening day of 1995-96, which many people saw as signalling the end of United’s successful era under Alex Ferguson. The opposite turned out to be true, but at the time did you think that United were facing a tough, barren season?

    No, I think everyone else thought that, but deep down we knew that the manager knew what he was doing, and that what he did would be best for the club. That season proved it. We won the Double – again – and to do that a second time is just brilliant.

    Speaking of Aston Villa, they have a very good record against United in recent seasons. Are there any teams – or players, for that matter – who you particularly don’t look forward to playing against?

    (Flatly) No, we’re not scared of any teams in the Premiership. And there are no players I hate playing against, because all the players are good players, and there’s no player who I think about like “oh, I don’t wanna play against him, I’ll never get past him.” There’s never once been a time when I thought that.

    Manchester United went through a seriously awful run of form in October of last year, beginning with a 5-0 beating away to Newcastle United which was United’s heaviest defeat since 1984 and Alex Ferguson’s worst result ever as a manager. Was that match the lowest point of your professional career to date?

    Not just that game. I think those two games that month, the 5-0 game at Newcastle and the 6-3 at Southampton, one after the other, I’d not experienced anything like that since I was in the United team. And neither had a lot of the other players.

    What goes through a footballer’s head in a situation like that, when a whole stadium is openly laughing at you and you’re watching your goalkeeper pick the ball out of the net for the fifth time?

    You can’t really explain it. You can’t explain the feeling that went through each player that day. It’s something I’ve never experienced before, and I wouldn’t like to experience it again. The weird thing is, we weren’t that bad on the day. We didn’t play that bad. And we did have chances. And also, we should have had a penalty just after they scored their first goal, their keeper flattened Karel (Poborsky) in the box, but that’s the way football goes. Y’know, you get decisions against you sometimes that you don’t want, you get ’em sometimes that you do want, but that’s just the way football is.

    What was Alex Ferguson’s response – did he take the defeat on the chin, or did he blow his top afterwards in the dressing-room?

    On the chin. He just said afterwards, “We’ve got to go and pick ourselves up now. It’s not a disaster. It’s just one of those things, y’know, today we just have to take our medicine. Every single Newcastle shot seemed to go into the net but that can happen.” He wasn’t throwing cups of tea at the wall or anything like that (laughs). He was calm – well, no, he wasn’t calm, but he was a lot more quiet than what people expected, I think. Because there’s nothing he could have done. After a game like that, no-one can say anything. The game against Southampton was similar. We had chances – I scored with a free-kick that day – but we gave silly goals away, and we got punished. But on the day, again, we didn’t play that bad.

    Within two weeks, United lost their 40-year unbeaten home record in Europe to Fenerbahge, as well as their two-year unbeaten Premiership home record to Chelsea. Can you explain why the club suffered such a series of disasters in such a short time?

    (Laughs) Nah, I dunno, I think it was just a bad month! Simple as that. It was the worst four weeks in football I’d ever had. Y’know, it’s just one of those things, we gotta go on from that.

    Is Alex Ferguson an iron disciplinarian, or is he more easy-going than most people think?

    He’s very disciplined, which is good. The way he is with all of us is unbelievable, y’know, the way he treats us. He treats us like men, not boys. He never screams at us. Well, he does sometimes, when we need it, y’know, but not much. I’ve never seen him lose it. I’ve never ever seen our manager lose control of himself, no. He’s got a lot of self-control and he knows what he wants, and how to get it. That’s the way he is.

    The verbal abuse which Peter Schmeichel heaps upon his defenders has become the stuff of footballing legend. Has he ever given you the treatment?

    Oh, yeah!

    What kind of stuff does he come out with in the heat of the moment?

    (Sheepishly) Well, I can’t really say it.

    Of course you can.

    Oh no, no, I couldn’t. Pete’s just one of those characters that you do need in your team. It’s like Bryan Robson or Steve Bruce or Roy Keane, or even Cantona. You need a character, and he is that type of person who gets everyone going in his own little way. Everyone points it out in the papers every time, but if somebody’s not doing their job right, Pete will have a go, he will tell ’em straight away. And he’s got his way of telling ’em. That is his way and that’s the way he’s always been, to the best of my knowledge. So we just accept it, because he wants things done right, y’know?

    What about when Schmeichel shouts at people even when it’s patently obvious to everybody that the mistake was his?

    That’s just his way. He’s one of the nicest blokes you could meet. Off the pitch, he’s totally different. He’s a really nice bloke.

    He’s made one or two mistakes recently. Has his ongoing feud with Ian Wright affected him at all?

    I’m not really allowed to mention that incident.

    Okay, to put it another way, is racism on the increase in football?

    Racism has come into football more and more, but it gets blown out of proportion. That thing in the papers about Pete and Ian Wright has been blown up so much that it’s unbelievable. Unbelievable. And Pete’s very upset about it.

    Have you yourself ever been on the receiving end of intimidation by opponents?

    Yeah, sure. There are players that say things to you, try and get you going, tap your ankles and of course kick you. It’s the way some players are, their way of getting themselves up for it. Sometimes it has got to me, and I do lash out (laughs). Sometimes.

    At the time of writing, you’ve won four caps for England. What was your favourite game in the white shirt?

    I think it’s gotta be the Poland game last October. It was the first time I’d played for England at Wembley. The whole atmosphere, y’know, going 1-0 down, coming back and winning the game, it was all just brilliant. Poland are a good team, a very good team, and we expected them to be at a certain standard, but we weren’t prepared for what we got at the start of the game (Poland took an early lead through Marek Citko and subsequently played England off the park – JO’B).

    Your other games for England included a couple of interesting away trips to the former Soviet Union.

    Yeah, Georgia was (long pause) different. It’s good to go and see countries like that, because, you know, you do miss England. When you’re over there, you just think (looks astonished, sharp intake of breath). Georgia’s a strange place. It was a lot better than Moldova, though. Moldova was the worst.

    Are we talking cockroaches in the shower and that sort of thing?

    Yeah. It just wasn’t clean. In fact it was filthy. The people on the streets looked really ragged. And it was just . . . (shudders) . . . yeah, I’d have to say, Moldova was definitely the worst.

    How does Glenn Hoddle differ as a coach from Alex Ferguson?

    Obviously, each manager’s got different ways and means of coaching, and he is different from Alex, but they’re both top quality managers. And that’s all I can say about ’em, cos that’s the truth. Glenn gave me my debut against Moldova and he just said “Go on out there and enjoy yourself, do what you do for your club.” Simple as that.

    England’s recent game against Italy was played at a very high tempo amid a frenzied atmosphere. Did you enjoy it?

    It was certainly an experience, because, again, it was at Wembley. I’ve got a real thing about playing at Wembley. And of course, against a team like Italy . . . y’know, people say “oh, they’re much better players,” and so on, but we’ve got just as good players in the Premiership as they have in Serie A, whatever players are there. But in any case, it was a great game to play in.

    After that match, many people likened it to United’s home fixture against Juventus in Europe, in that each game could have gone on for another five days and the home side still wouldn’t have scored.

    Well, I don’t think the two matches were that similar, because in both games, in the first half it was very tough for us. But in the second half at Wembley, England didn’t create that many chances against Italy, and yet at Old Trafford, United attacked Juventus so much in the second half that I don’t think they’ve experienced anything like that before or since. Y’know, I don’t think Juventus had had to put up with that sort of thing for a long time.

    With that in mind, does United’s home performance against Juventus give you hope for the forthcoming games in Europe?

    I’m not allowed to speak about the Porto game. I’ve been told. Sorry. (This interview took place six days before United won 4-0 against Porto – JO’B.)

    Do the players approach European football in a different manner than they usually would a Premiership fixture?

    We don’t prepare in a different way at all. We might go out a day before we usually do. We always go to away games the night before, although sometimes we might go out two days before. Depends on what sort of game it is, like, y’know, whether it’s Rapid Vienna or Rotor Volgograd we’re playing. Sometimes you have to get used to the atmosphere of the place, things like that. Turkey was a scary experience. My first time there, when we played Galatasaray and drew 0-0, was worse than the second year, which was this season against Fenerbahge. The first year was frightening, actually frightening, but the second year was okay, it wasn’t as bad as that.

    The average footballer’s working day ends at 1pm with the conclusion of training. What do you do for the rest of the day?

    I like to shop, believe it or not. I love clothes shops.

    What kind of clobber would you typically buy?

    Suits, casual gear, stuff like that. Y’know, I wear suits for matches anyway, so I’m in my element. There’s a shop called Flannels in Manchester. One of my mates works in there, so I just go in there and have a talk with him and look at the clothes.

    Does he give you any discounts?

    (Laughs) Not enough.

    You’d hardly need any, though, with the wages you’re on.

    That’s a fair point, I s’pose. But yeah, we do get 10% off.

    Do you have any particular favourite designer labels?

    I like Donna Karan, and I also like Gucci and Prada. They’d be top of my list.

    Apart from investing in haute couture, what else occupies your spare time?

    I like going out for meals and going to the pictures, things like that. I’m also a bit of a music fan. I’m into soul, R’n’B, that kind of thing. R Kelly’s one of my favourites, I’ve seen him in concert a few times. He’s the one I listen to most of the time, but there are others that I do like. LL Cool J as well – rappy, but not too much.

    The English transfer market recently reached a new depth of utter madness with West Ham’s purchase of John Hartson for #5.5 million. As a young professional earning thousands of pounds a week, do you feel that there is now simply far too much money in the game?

    No way, I think there should be more (laughs). Nah, I’m joking. I think transfer fees have gone up a lot, and there are players who are getting so much money it’s unbelievable, but that’s up to the clubs. Players work for those fees, and if a club wants to pay that kind of wages, that’s up to them, y’know what I mean?

    Finally, what’s your considered opinion of the ABU (Anyone But United) subculture, which has reached the stage where people practically throw impromptu street parties every time Manchester United lose a game?

    Ah, it’s just sad jealousy a lot of the time. People are jealous of what Man United do. It’s always been the same since I’ve supported the club. They’re totally envious of what Man United have got, and what we win. And that’s the way it’s always gonna be, I think. It’s only started since we began winning trophies again. As I said, it’s jealousy. It’s up to those people if they want to be like that.