In a dramatic and explosive shift within the House of Windsor, Meghan Markle may be on the brink of losing everything — her titles, her influence, and what little remains of her royal credibility.

The latest blow came not from a new Netflix documentary or a self-pitying podcast, but from beyond the grave.

Lady Elizabeth Anson, a respected cousin of the late Queen Elizabeth II, revealed in stunning new testimony that Meghan was never truly loved by the Queen — and was, in fact, the source of deep pain and regret during the monarch’s final years. According to Anson, Meghan was “rude,” “manipulative,” and “never truly in love with Harry.” Even more shocking: Harry allegedly spoke to his grandmother in “revolting” ways behind closed doors.

For many royal watchers, this was confirmation of what they long suspected — Meghan used the royal family as a springboard to global fame.

But now, the palace is fighting back.

Prince William, long silent in the face of his brother’s and sister-in-law’s media ambushes, is reportedly plotting to take the nuclear option: the removal of Harry and Meghan’s Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles. Sources say William has “had enough” of the couple’s repeated attacks and has received a tacit blessing from his ailing father, King Charles, to act once the throne is his.

Charles, battling cancer, is said to fear public backlash if he revokes the titles himself. But William — fiercely protective of his wife, Princess Catherine, and furious at the damage done to the institution — reportedly has no such hesitation.

“It’s a matter of when, not if,” said one insider.

The issue isn’t just Meghan’s constant undermining of the monarchy or her gleeful trashing of the late Queen. It’s her alleged intent — a calculated campaign, critics claim, to infiltrate and destroy from within.

Royal biographer Angela Levin didn’t mince words. “She’s lied, she’s manipulated, and she’s treated the Queen with shocking disrespect,” Levin declared. “She deserves punishment. Prison, if possible. And I’m not saying that as a joke.”

Such statements may sound hyperbolic, but the sentiment is gaining ground. Across the UK, a growing number of commentators, MPs, and royalists alike are voicing the once-taboo opinion: that Meghan’s behavior has crossed a line from controversial to dangerous.

But the revelations don’t end there.

Veteran royal journalist Phil Dampier added fuel to the fire, claiming Meghan saw the royal family “as a stepping stone” — a means to gain global recognition after a fading Hollywood career. According to Dampier, even the Queen came to believe Meghan had no intention of remaining a working royal.

And then there’s the matter of the wedding — the £32 million taxpayer-funded spectacle that Meghan now dismisses as something “she never wanted.” As Levin put it: “She never said a word of gratitude. Not once. Instead, she smashed the institution to pieces.”

The question now being asked across royal circles: how much longer will this continue?

Despite years of scandal, leaks, and tell-all interviews, Meghan and Harry still carry their royal titles. They still capitalize on their connection to the Crown, while seemingly doing everything in their power to tear it down. Critics argue that this hypocrisy has to end — and fast.

Interestingly, William may not have to act alone.

The Mail on Sunday recently floated the idea that the UK could follow the Danish model. In 2022, Queen Margrethe of Denmark stripped her grandchildren of their princely titles, arguing that it would give them freedom to pursue lives outside the royal spotlight. The move was decisive, graceful — and widely applauded.

Could King Charles, or one day William, do the same?

Levin thinks so. “It’s a brilliant solution. But Meghan will fight. She’s spiteful. She’s dangerous. And she won’t go quietly.”

The risks of retaliation are real. Meghan has a global platform, a loyal American base, and a long memory. Any move against her could trigger another media firestorm — or even legal action. But increasingly, British voices are saying: Bring it on.

Because for many, this isn’t just about royal drama. It’s about justice, integrity, and protecting the legacy of Queen Elizabeth II.

“She was old, she was ill, and Meghan still attacked her,” Levin said, her voice full of fury. “That’s not royal rebellion. That’s cruelty. That’s treason.”

Indeed, the term “treason” — once unthinkable in this context — has now entered the conversation. Whether used metaphorically or not, it signals a new level of outrage. A sense that Meghan hasn’t just disrespected the monarchy — she’s tried to dismantle it.

And in a final twist, even former allies appear to be turning.

James Holt, once a trusted communications advisor to Meghan and Harry, has raised eyebrows by “liking” posts praising Prince William’s Earthshot Prize and supporting former staffer Jason Knauf — the man who exposed Meghan’s alleged bullying of royal staff.

Is Holt jumping ship? Or is this part of a broader Sussex rebrand?

Nobody knows for sure. But the walls may be closing in.

For now, Meghan remains Duchess of Sussex. But her support is shrinking. Her approval ratings are plummeting. And in the royal palace, the knives are quietly — but unmistakably — being sharpened.

The question is no longer if the hammer will fall… but when.

And when it does, the monarchy will be ready. The public will be ready. And perhaps, finally, Queen Elizabeth II will rest a little easier.