Ferrari Didn’t Fumble at Silverstone. They Were Flying Blind.

It’s easy to point fingers at Ferrari. Every Formula 1 fan with a Twitter account or a YouTube channel has taken a swing at the Prancing Horse’s strategic missteps over the years. But this time, at Silverstone 2025, the narrative is more complex than another “Ferrari fumble.”

Because this time, they weren’t clueless. They were blind.

In front of thousands of passionate fans, drenched in red flags and roaring support, Ferrari was fighting without one of the most crucial assets in modern motorsport — real-time GPS data.

“We lost the GPS of Lewis the entire race,” team principal Fred Vasseur calmly revealed after the British Grand Prix. “We were completely blind.”

In today’s hyper-connected, data-driven Formula 1, that’s not a glitch. That’s a catastrophe.

The Anatomy of a Missed Podium

Lap 41. The track was drying. The window for slicks was opening. Lewis Hamilton, back at his beloved Silverstone, boxed for dry tyres. It was a borderline call. A heartbeat too early.

Exiting the pits, Hamilton hit the greasiest part of the circuit. Turns 3 and 4 were treacherous. He slid. He lost time. By the time the rubber bit and the pace returned, it was too late. Nico Hülkenberg had slipped through. P3 was gone.

Hamilton would finish fourth — mere seconds from a podium on his home turf and his first as a Ferrari driver.

Was it a blunder? Maybe. But from inside the garage, it wasn’t recklessness. It was survival.

Battleship, Not Chess

Without GPS, Ferrari didn’t know where Hamilton was relative to other cars on the track — not with the precision needed to call strategy in real time. They couldn’t see where he’d rejoin after a pit stop. They couldn’t predict whether he’d come out ahead of Hülkenberg or behind traffic. They couldn’t simulate outcomes on the fly.

They weren’t playing 4D chess like Red Bull or Mercedes. They were playing Battleship — guessing grid coordinates and hoping to score a hit. And they nearly did.

Vasseur admitted it: “Yes, maybe it was one lap too early… but if you wait until the others make the move, it’s too late.”

This wasn’t a tactical blunder. It was an operational exposure. And in F1, there’s a thin line between genius and disaster. Ferrari walked that line — and didn’t fall.

The True Cost of Broken Systems

Silverstone wasn’t just about one lost podium. It exposed a broader truth: Ferrari, despite all its progress under Vasseur, is still catching up on the systems that make the top teams bulletproof.

Red Bull and Mercedes invest in layered tech stacks: real-time AI simulations, telemetry redundancy, weather-linked pit window modeling. They’re not just racing engineers — they’re data scientists.

Ferrari? They’re evolving. But they’re not there yet.

It’s why they keep ending up in these high-wire, high-stakes calls. And while instinct still plays a role, Formula 1 in 2025 is no longer a sport you can win by gut alone.

The Resilience Behind the Chaos

But here’s the twist: Ferrari is adapting. Quickly.

Hamilton isn’t just racing. He’s shaping the future of the team, already working with engineers on the 2026 car design. Vasseur is restructuring race operations. And his right hand, Jérôme d’Ambrosio, is proving to be more than just a support act — he’s emerging as a strategic brain in his own right.

P4 at Silverstone, under those conditions, wasn’t a failure. It was proof of resilience. And if Ferrari can sort the tech, plug the systems, and fuse that with their raw talent?

They won’t just compete. They’ll dominate.

So no — this wasn’t a fumble. It was a warning shot. A sign that when Ferrari puts all the pieces together, they’ll be dangerous.

Red Bull: Empire on the Brink

And speaking of chaos — the biggest story of the Silverstone weekend wasn’t on the track. It was in the boardroom.

Christian Horner, the longest-serving team principal in the modern era, is gone. Fired. Not retired. Not reassigned. Removed.

In a move that sent shockwaves through the paddock, Red Bull parted ways with the man who built them into a dynasty: 14 championships, 124 wins, two generations of domination.

The reasons? Officially: “internal restructuring.” Unofficially? A storm of controversy, fractured alliances, and political pressure.

Most critically — a breakdown in trust with the Verstappen camp.

Max’s Quiet Goodbye

Max Verstappen’s response to Horner’s departure was chilling in its restraint.

No fire. No fury. Just a sterile farewell: “Thank you for everything, Christian.”

This was no outburst. This was a funeral. A man burying the past and preparing for what’s next.

Verstappen isn’t sentimental. He’s calculating. And with a performance clause in his contract — one that could free him if Red Bull slips further — the timing is ominous.

Mercedes is circling. Ferrari is rebuilding. And Red Bull? They’re hemorrhaging talent.

The War for F1’s Future

The exit of Horner is more than an HR move. It’s a power vacuum.

With Adrian Newey gone, Jonathan Wheatley rumored to be leaving, and Helmut Marko fading from influence, the house Horner built is cracking at the foundation.

Enter Laurent Mekies. Enter uncertainty.

And enter a Formula 1 that is shifting — from driver-dominated narratives to a new era of team boss politics, performance clauses, and high-stakes recruitment.

This isn’t just racing. It’s war. And 2025 is the first battle.

Final Thoughts: Don’t Be Fooled

If you watched Silverstone and thought Ferrari blew it — think again.

They were racing blind. And they still nearly hit the target.

If you saw Red Bull’s quiet statement about Horner and assumed it was routine — look deeper.

This is a reshuffle with seismic consequences. Because in Formula 1, the true drama often plays out far from the cameras — in data rooms, back channels, and boardrooms.

The next era of F1? It’s not just about who has the fastest car.

It’s about who controls the future.

Full Video:

Max Verstappen and Red Bull: A Partnership on the Edge of Reinvention

In the high-stakes world of Formula 1, where team dynamics, driver loyalty, and corporate power plays often intersect, the future of Max Verstappen at Red Bull Racing is rapidly becoming one of the sport’s most compelling storylines. What once seemed like a dynasty in the making now appears to be a fragile empire on the brink. Red Bull, rocked by internal strife and critical departures, is reportedly ready to offer Verstappen an unprecedented level of control—going as far as potentially naming one of their F1 teams after the Dutch superstar. But does this reflect visionary innovation or sheer desperation?

The Turmoil at Red Bull

The last 12 months have seen Red Bull Racing undergo a seismic transformation. What began as whispers about tensions within the team has erupted into a public unraveling. The departure of legendary designer Adrian Newey, team stalwarts Jonathan Wheatley and Pierre Waché, and ultimately the ousting of Christian Horner, once considered the backbone of Red Bull’s success, signal deeper instability.

Red Bull’s meteoric rise over the past decade wasn’t just about strong driver lineups; it was about a synchronized, well-oiled machine of leadership, engineering, and aggressive yet calculated risk-taking. With this core team now fractured, questions loom large about whether the current Red Bull has the ability to sustain its dominance, especially as the sport prepares for its next technical evolution in 2026.

The Verstappen Dilemma

Max Verstappen has been the face of Red Bull’s modern era, a generational talent whose fiery style and relentless drive have earned him four world titles. But Verstappen’s relationship with Red Bull has also been one of convenience as much as loyalty. His open frustration during races, demand for competitive machinery, and growing influence over team decisions have placed him in a unique position: he is arguably bigger than the team itself.

The potential decision by Red Bull to name one of its two teams after Verstappen—or allow him title sponsorship-level influence—is nothing short of revolutionary in F1 terms. No team, not even Ferrari with Schumacher or Mercedes with Hamilton, has granted such stature to a driver. It signals both recognition of Verstappen’s value and the team’s willingness to do whatever it takes to keep him onboard.

But is that wise?

The Risks of Overcommitment

Handing that much influence to a driver sets a dangerous precedent. Formula 1 has always been a team sport at its core, where collaboration and collective leadership are essential. Allowing a single individual—no matter how talented—to steer not just race strategies but also the branding and business orientation of a team could lead to internal conflict, governance issues, and fractured cohesion.

Moreover, Verstappen, as exceptional as he is on track, is not a corporate strategist or team principal. Should the performance of the team continue to dip, as it has in the wake of technical setbacks in 2024, the blame could start pointing back at Verstappen himself. For someone who thrives on control and clarity, that could prove emotionally and professionally taxing.

Mercedes: A Tempting Alternative

While Red Bull scrambles to secure Verstappen’s future, Mercedes has quietly positioned itself as a highly attractive option. Following Lewis Hamilton’s shock move to Ferrari for 2025, Toto Wolff has a rare opportunity—and a budget slot—to lure a proven champion into the fold. A Verstappen-Mercedes partnership would send shockwaves through the sport, akin to Hamilton’s initial move from McLaren or even Schumacher’s departure from Benetton to Ferrari.

The draw is obvious: Mercedes offers stability, a culture of excellence, and the engineering know-how to excel in the 2026 regulations. It also provides Verstappen with the chance to elevate his legacy—to prove he can win with more than one team, much like Hamilton and Alonso before him.

Still, this path carries reputational baggage. Mercedes and Verstappen have been fierce rivals, particularly following the controversial 2021 season. Forging a partnership would require cultural and emotional realignment—for both the team and its fanbase.

The 2026 Gamble

Much of this uncertainty is framed by the looming engine regulation changes in 2026. Red Bull Powertrains, in collaboration with Ford, will be entering uncharted territory. Unlike Mercedes, Ferrari, or even Audi, who bring decades of engine-building experience, Red Bull’s venture is a leap of faith. If their power unit fails to meet performance expectations, Verstappen may find himself fighting in the midfield—an unthinkable prospect for someone who races only to win.

This unknown factor makes Verstappen’s decision so critical. Does he commit to a team undergoing massive change with no guarantee of future success, lured by control and legacy-building opportunities? Or does he cut ties while his stock is high, joining a team poised for a resurgence?

What Red Bull Must Consider

While it’s understandable that Red Bull would move heaven and earth to keep Verstappen, they also must consider the long-term implications of their choices. Creating a driver-centric team could alienate sponsors, destabilize management, and discourage future talent from joining a system that appears built around one individual.

Red Bull must strike a delicate balance: offer Verstappen the respect and influence he’s earned without surrendering the team’s identity. If not, they risk turning their greatest asset into their biggest liability.

Furthermore, investing in engineering talent, stabilizing leadership, and future-proofing their team against regulatory and competitive changes should be higher on the priority list than symbolic gestures. Titles are won in the garage, not in the boardroom.

Final Thoughts

Max Verstappen’s future at Red Bull is far from guaranteed. The team’s willingness to rename a team in his honor shows both their desperation and recognition of his value. But such a move is fraught with risk and sets a precedent Formula 1 has never seen.

If Verstappen stays, he could become more than a champion—he could become a brand within the brand, a singular force redefining what it means to be a driver in Formula 1. But if he leaves, Red Bull will be forced to rebuild not just their car, but their very identity.

In the end, the real question is this: does Red Bull want to be a championship team with Max Verstappen, or a Verstappen team that happens to race in F1?

Only time—and perhaps the 2026 grid—will tell.

Full Video:

Red Bull Racing in Crisis: The Fall of a Dynasty and the Uncertain Future of Formula 1’s Powerhouse

It all began with a bang. Christian Horner, the iron-willed team principal who led Red Bull Racing for over two decades, was unceremoniously removed from his position. There was no press conference, no fond farewell—just silence and then shock. What followed wasn’t merely a change in personnel, but a cascade of exits and internal conflict that signaled something far more dire: the collapse of an empire.

In the weeks following Horner’s exit, the dominoes fell fast and hard. Paul Smith, Director of Communications, and Oliver Hughes, Chief Marketing Officer, were both placed on gardening leave. Long before this, legendary figures like technical genius Adrian Newey, engineer Rob Marshall, and sporting director Jonathan Wheatley had all stepped away. This wasn’t just a reshuffle. This was a revolution—and not the kind Red Bull had orchestrated in the early 2010s when it redefined the limits of Formula 1 performance.

Now, all eyes have shifted to one of the last standing titans of the old guard: Dr. Helmut Marko. The Austrian, a long-time Red Bull adviser and architect of its formidable driver development program, is both revered and reviled in the paddock. To some, he’s the brutal mastermind behind drivers like Sebastian Vettel and Max Verstappen. To others, he’s an outdated figure whose ironfisted leadership is now dragging the team backward.

The Power Vacuum Post-Horner

Horner’s sudden departure marked the start of a visible power vacuum. Into this void stepped Laurent Mekies, the former AlphaTauri team boss, now promoted to CEO of Red Bull Racing. It’s a meteoric rise into one of the most high-pressure jobs in motorsport, and he inherits a team not only in disarray but in decline.

For the first time in years, Red Bull no longer dominates the grid. Currently fourth in the Constructors’ Championship—an eye-watering 288 points behind McLaren—the team is not just losing races, it’s losing its identity. And while Mekies is tasked with steering the ship back on course, his position is made harder by the presence of one of Red Bull’s most divisive figures—Helmut Marko.

Marko: The Relic or the Rock?

Marko has always been a polarizing force. Lauded for discovering talent like Verstappen, Pierre Gasly, and Sebastian Vettel, he’s also criticized for his no-nonsense, sometimes tactless handling of young drivers. Most recently, his harsh criticism of rookie Isaac Hadjar, who crashed out during his F1 debut, sparked public outrage and highlighted a leadership style many now see as out of touch.

Former driver and pundit Christian Albers didn’t mince words: “Marko is no longer an asset. He’s a liability.” And with Horner gone, Marko’s influence stands isolated—without the long-standing buffer of his team principal ally. To many in the sport, he’s now the final domino standing in the way of meaningful change.

Max Verstappen: The Crown Jewel at Risk

As if the internal chaos wasn’t enough, Red Bull’s greatest current asset—three-time world champion Max Verstappen—is at a crossroads. While Max himself has maintained a calm demeanor, the same can’t be said for his father, Jos Verstappen. The elder Verstappen was reportedly instrumental in pushing for Horner’s removal and has publicly clashed with Red Bull leadership over the last year.

These fractures have fueled speculation about Max’s future. Most notably, rumors linking him to Mercedes are gaining traction by the day. George Russell, Mercedes’ current driver, has yet to renew his contract beyond 2025 and has hinted that Verstappen’s movements are influencing his decision. That’s more than innuendo—it’s a signal.

Fueling the rumors is a reported exit clause in Verstappen’s long-term Red Bull contract (which otherwise runs through 2028). If Max falls outside the top four in the Drivers’ Championship standings after the Hungarian Grand Prix, he could activate that clause and walk. As of the British Grand Prix, he sat fifth—just 46 points behind Charles Leclerc with 58 still up for grabs. Should Leclerc outperform expectations in the next race, the door to Mercedes may open fully.

The Mercedes Opportunity

From Mercedes’ side, the timing couldn’t be better. With Lewis Hamilton leaving for Ferrari in 2025, they have the budget, infrastructure, and legacy appeal. All they lack is a marquee name. And for Verstappen—disillusioned by Red Bull’s internal collapse and hungry for sustained dominance—Mercedes could be the fresh start he didn’t know he needed.

Is Marko Holding Red Bull Back?

Back at Red Bull, the tension between modernizing the team and honoring its legacy has reached a tipping point. Mekies faces a Herculean task: stabilize a fractured organization, secure Verstappen’s loyalty, modernize the team’s public image, and restore Red Bull to the top of the leaderboard.

But none of that may be possible as long as Marko remains.

Supporters say Marko provides continuity, discipline, and a deep knowledge of the sport. But critics argue that his methods are now detrimental—especially in a modern F1 environment that values collaboration, emotional intelligence, and public perception as much as raw speed.

Marko’s recent praise of Horner following his dismissal—unexpected and effusive—was seen by some as a political move, perhaps an attempt to maintain relevance or smooth his own exit. But in a rapidly evolving Red Bull, such tactics may no longer carry weight.

The Road Ahead

The next twelve races could define the next decade of Formula 1. Red Bull’s leadership crisis is more than just a storyline—it’s a litmus test for how a modern F1 team should evolve. Will it cling to the old ways of ruthlessness and hierarchy? Or will it pivot toward a more progressive, resilient model of leadership?

The question remains: Is Helmut Marko the last obstacle to Red Bull’s rebirth? Or is he the only thread still holding a crumbling empire together?

And perhaps more significantly—if Verstappen does make the leap to Mercedes—will it spark a new era of dominance for the Silver Arrows or sound the death knell for Red Bull Racing as we know it?

Only time, and the next few Grand Prix weekends, will tell.

Full Video:

Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh, shares children Lady Louise Windsor and James, Earl of Wessex, with husband Prince Edward who she married in 1999 aged 34 – but she struggled to conceive

For the Duchess of Edinburgh, the road to motherhood was filled with heartbreak and two terrifying near death experiences, according to a new biography.

Sophie: Saving The Royal Family by Sean Smith, lays bare Sophie’s secret struggles to have children. The now mother-of-two married Prince Edward in a star studded ceremony at St George’s Chapel, Windsor, in June 1999. But behind the smiles, the Countess – as she was then – was quietly aware that time was against her.

At 34, she longed to start a family but feared her biological clock was ticking. Friends noticed her discreet visits to Harley Street fertility expert Zita West, dubbed the “baby whisperer,” who prescribed holistic therapies including Pilates, acupuncture and nutritional guidance to boost her chances of conceiving.

Sophie suffered fertility struggles as the start of her motherhood journey(Image: Getty Images)

In late 2001, Sophie’s joy was uncontainable when she discovered she was pregnant. But her happiness was short-lived. At just six weeks, she began suffering stomach pains.

In the early hours of the morning, Edward sprang into action, summoning royal doctors. Fearing an ectopic pregnancy – where a fertilised egg implants outside the womb – they called for an air ambulance.

Sophie shares two children with husband Edward(Image: PA)

As the helicopter landed on the lawn at Bagshot Park, Sophie was rushed to London’s King Edward VII’s Hospital. She underwent emergency surgery lasting three hours and required five pints of blood.

Outside the hospital, Edward, visibly shaken, addressed waiting reporters. “It’s obviously a very traumatic time and my wife has… it’s quite the most painful thing anyone can undergo. It’s a pretty traumatic experience,” he said.

Sophie later released a statement expressing her heartbreak: “I am obviously very sad but it was just not meant to be. But there will be other chances. The nurses have been unbelievably fantastic.”

Sophie suffered two near death experiences(Image: Getty Images)

Determined not to give up, the couple turned to IVF. After two unsuccessful rounds, their third attempt worked and in summer 2003 Sophie was pregnant again.

This time she took no chances, stepping back from royal duties and giving up horse riding to protect her pregnancy.

By November 2003, she was glowing as she carried out engagements. But just two days after opening Childline’s new headquarters, another scare hit the couple.

Alone at home while Edward was on an official visit to Mauritius, Sophie suffered intense stomach pain.

She was rushed to Frimley Park Hospital. Doctors diagnosed a placental abruption, where the placenta separates from the womb, cutting off oxygen to the baby. Sophie was losing blood fast.

An emergency caesarean delivered baby Lady Louise prematurely at just 4lb 9oz. She was whisked to a neonatal unit while doctors battled to save Sophie, who required nine pints of blood and drifted in and out of consciousness.

Edward flew back from Mauritius in shock to find both his wife and newborn fighting for their lives. “It’s been a pretty fraught time,” he admitted.

The late Queen Elizabeth II broke protocol to visit her youngest son’s wife in hospital. When Sophie was discharged after 16 days, she and Edward posed with their tiny daughter, the relief evident on their faces.

Sophie now actively supports charities and organisations involved in neonatal care(Image: Aldershot News and Mail)

“For the first ten years after Louise was born, I found it very hard to go to ‘prem’ wards. It would bring the whole thing back,” Sophie later said.

But out of her trauma came purpose. The Duchess became a passionate advocate for neonatal care and air ambulance services – the same people that had saved her and her daughter.

In 2007, Sophie and Edward welcomed a second child, James, Viscount Severn. Miraculously, this pregnancy was straightforward and delivered safely by planned caesarean.

At home, Sophie sought to give her children as normal an upbringing as possible.

The Queen, a doting grandmother, would often watch Mr Tumble on CBeebies with Louise and James during family visits to Windsor. “I guess not everyone’s grandparents live in a castle, but where you are going is not the important part, or who they are,” Sophie reflected.

Her bond with the late Queen deepened through shared experiences of family life. Sophie even learned to embrace her mother-in-law’s passions – fishing in Scotland and shooting pheasant on royal estates.

Sophie: Saving The Royal Family by Sean Smith is set to be published on July 17.

Katie Price has recently opened up about not being invited to her eldest daughter’s 18th birthday party, as she said “certain people don’t think it’s good for Princess to be seen with me”

Katie shared a sweet message(Image: @katieprice/instagram)

Katie Price has reached out to her daughter Princess after being banned from her 18th birthday party. The mum-of-five has taken to her Instagram story to share a sweet message with her eldest daughter.

She shared a quote calling Princess “the most beautiful girl ever” as she tagged her as well. The message read: “Name a girl that can wear no makeup, no fake lashes and still be the most beautiful girl ever.”

Princess has made it clear she doesn’t plan on undergoing cosmetic surgery, stating she’s been “put off for life” after seeing the impact on her mother. Katie said she would support Princess if she did opt to have tweakments in the future but said she wanted her to wait until she was at least 21. Katie was just 18 when she underwent her first boob job.

Katie posted the huge compliment to her teenage daughter despite apparent family tension lately. Kate wasn’t invite to Princess’ 18th birthday party, but it seems that she isn’t holding any hard feelings.

Katie Price reached out to daughter Princess

The former glamour model revealed that she was banned from the celebrations, but the decision wasn’t down to Princess. She talked about the situation on the most recent episode of her Katie Price Show podcast alongside her sister Sophie.

Katie wished Princess a happy birthday as she explained: “Princess is now officially an adult so mummy and Princess can now go out together. If certain people would let her be seen with me.”

After discussing with Sophie, Katie then went on to speak about Princess’ new documentary which Katie is also not involved in. Katie said: “Everyone knows she’s doing this documentary – and I’m not in it. Certain people don’t think it’s good for Princess to be seen with me. Certain people that used to look after me.”

This is when Sophie hit back with why she thinks Katie isn’t allowed to be involved. Sophie said: “You aren’t on brand Katie. You are too risky Katie that’s why.”

Katie then seemed to start to talk about Peter Andre and their old PR team who now manage her ex husband and their children Junior and Princess. She explained: “It’s pathetic. I’m her mother. It’s sad. It’s so sad. When certain people who used to look after me are now looking after…”

It’s thought that the reason Katie wasn’t invited is because the party was going to be filmed for Princess’ documentary. Katie hit back: “The fact is there’s stuff my daughter is doing and I’m not allowed to be seen at any of it.

“Certain people who are filming Princess’ documentary used to do my filming. It’s fine, it’s just there’s always conflict of interest. People will cotton on to this. So we do have to do something for Princess’ 18th.”

While Princess had her 18th party, Katie jetted off to Ibiza to enjoy the summer sun. She has been documenting her holiday on social media where she has been rubbing shoulders with other celebs.

Katie was spotted being pictured at Wayne Lineker’s Ocean Beach Club, where she was seen hanging out with the owner and fellow guest Conor McGregor.

Robbie Williams spoke about his parents and his mother-in-law at a gig in Germany on his Britpop tour recently, with the former Take That member speaking about their health

Robbie Williams shared an update on his parents, including his mother Janet, at a recent gig(Image: Getty Images)

Former Take That member Robbie Williams has shared an update on his family, including his mother, Janet Williams and his father, Peter Williams. The singer-songwriter spoke about his parents whilst on stage at a concert recently.

Robbie, 51, is touring Europe at the moment on the Britpop tour, which opened in the UK earlier this year. It included performing in Germany, where he spoke about his parents’ health and his wife Ayda Field’s mother, Gwen Field.

The BRIT Award winner shared last year that his mother, Janet, had been diagnosed with dementia whilst his father, Peter, was dealing with Parkinson’s disease. Robbie said at the time that he was in a “different part” of his life now.

Robbie Williams (centre) shared an update on his parents Peter Williams (left) and Janet Williams (right) at a gig on his Britpop tour(Image: @poppapete299)

As reported by the Sun, Robbie provided an update on his parents at one of his gigs, as well as speaking about his mother-in-law Gwen’s health. It included him saying that Janet doesn’t know who he is or where she is anymore.

Robbie told the crowd at a recent concert: “My mother has dementia and she doesn’t know who I am anymore.” He said that Janet doesn’t know “where she is” now either.

Speaking about Peter, he said: “My dad has Parkinson’s and he can’t leave the house.” Robbie recalled his father singing to him every night on stage, saying that he would “steal the show” and then return backstage for a glass of wine.

According to the outlet, Robbie also spoke about his mother-in-law Gwen. It comes following the news in October last year that his wife Ayda’s mother had been diagnosed with cancer once again.

Ayda shared at the time that Gwen had been told that her cervical cancer “had come back and metastasized”. Gwen, who fans had previously been told has Parkinson’s and lupus too, later thanked her daughter, son-in-law and fans for their support.

He also spoke about his mother-in-law Gwen Field, pictured, whose daughter Ayda Field is married to Robbie(Image: aydafieldwilliams/instagram)

Robbie said at the concert: “My mother-in-law, who I absolutely worship and adore, has three illnesses.” He then referenced lupus, cancer and Parkinson’s before describing Gwen as the “most courageous lady” who is “fighting”.

The outlet reports that he then told the audience at the venue that it feels “very strange” to be “the grown up”. Robbie added that he is “not ready for it”.

Robbie launched the Britpop tour in Edinburgh in May. He’s since performed at venues in London, Manchester and Bath. More recently, he headed abroad and has performed in countries such as Denmark, France and Spain.

EXCLUSIVE: Cheryl has been left ‘heartbroken’ over the fact that Liam Payne’s final TV project, Netflix talent show Building The Band, is now available for the world to see

Liam Payne and Cheryl are parents to son, Bear

Emotions were running high last week when the first four episodes of Liam Payne’s final TV project, the Netflix talent show Building The Band, were released.

And no one was finding it harder than Liam’s former partner, Cheryl Tweedy, the mother of their eight-year-old son, Bear. According to those close to her, the former Girls Aloud star found it “heartbreaking”, as the programme highlighted the sheer magnitude of her and Bear’s loss.

“It is very sad for Cheryl,” a source told the Mirror. “She’s very proud that Liam’s final project is now available for the world to see, but obviously it’s heartbreaking, too, after Liam’s death. It’s a poignant reminder to Cheryl – and to his fans – of how much more Liam could have done with his life. But that potential was tragically cut short.”

Liam Payne’s final TV project, the Netflix talent show Building The Band was recently released(Image: Netflix)

Cheryl, 42, who was in a relationship with Liam from 2016 to 2018, is said to be focusing on how this will affect Bear, and how much Liam is missed as a father.

“He had so much going for him, as well as being a devoted father to Bear,” our source claimed. “It’s another reason why Cheryl wanted to continue with her own TV career – to show Bear that there is life after losing Liam, that you can be strong and that he can pick himself up. He can be anything he wants to be in life.”

Last week, Building The Band’s host, AJ McLean from the Backstreet Boys, paid tribute to the One Direction star, who died last October at the age of just 31.

At the start of the first episode, AJ, 47, said of his late friend and co-star, “When we came together to film Building The Band, we never imagined we’d soon be saying goodbye to our friend, Liam Payne.

“Liam is a guest judge in later episodes and, through his presence, we see his deep love for music and his unwavering commitment to helping others find their voice. It’s through that spirit that we dedicate this series to Liam and his family.”

One devastated fan who watched the show posted, “It’s so good to see him happy and in his element, but it’s sad knowing this is his last project. I can’t watch this without bawling my eyes out.”

Other fans were equally triggered by the sight of Liam, who looked healthy and happy on their screens. “Emotional and angry he can’t be here,” wrote one follower, while another added, “My heart stopped for a moment when I heard his voice and then saw him.”

Liam finished filming the show, in which he appears alongside Nicole Scherzinger and Kelly Rowland as a guest judge, just two months before he tragically died after falling from his hotel suite in Argentina.

While he doesn’t appear in the first four episodes, the singer is prominent in the show’s trailer and will feature later in the series, after his devastated family gave Netflix their blessing.

Prior to Building The Band’s release, Liam’s sister, Ruth, said that she was “heartbroken” her brother won’t get to see how his final TV project turned out.

“He knew he had done a good job, we all told him this when we were at filming, but watching it back–woah!” she said on her Instagram Stories.

“There are a range of emotions I felt watching this, but one of the main ones is immeasurable pride, always. Miss you more every day.”

In a touching full-circle moment, Liam appears alongside former Pussycat Dolls star Nicole, who helped put One Direction together during her stint as an X Factor judge back in 2010.

Cheryl posted a picture of Liam Payne holding their baby boy, Bear(Image: Daily Record)

At the time of his death, Liam had already recorded a substantial amount of footage and the streaming giant confirmed that he would remain central to its narrative, having been given the go-ahead by his family.

Showrunner Cat Lawson described him as a “glorious person”, adding, “The show is dedicated to Liam. We all loved him and he was amazing in the show.”

Simon Hay, the shooting producer- director, remembered Liam as “chatty and approachable”, adding that he always remembered people’s names.

Poignantly, Liam seems in good spirits on screen as he helps aspiring artists on their path to success. But for many fans, seeing their idol was a bittersweet experience.

“Oh, how it hurts seeing him, but I couldn’t be prouder of this wonderful human being,” one wrote, while another said, “They honoured Liam in a way that truly reflected who he was.”

Liam’s appearance is a far cry from the disturbing picture that was painted following his untimely death in Buenos Aires. Last November, toxicology tests revealed traces of alcohol, cocaine and a prescription antidepressant in his body, while a post-mortem determined his cause of death as “multiple trauma” and “internal and external haemorrhage” as a result of his fatal fall.

Following the shock news of Liam’s passing, Cheryl described the loss as “earth-shattering”, adding, “Liam was not only a pop star and celebrity, he was a son, a brother, an uncle, a dear friend and a father to our seven-year-old son. A son that now has to face the reality of never seeing his father again.”

The Princess of Wales has attended Wimbledon for a second day, bringing Prince William, Prince George, and Princess Charlotte along for the men’s finals on Sunday

Kate abandoned monarchy as she arrived at Wimbledon on Sunday (Image: Stephen Lock / i-Images)

The Prince and Princess of Wales beamed as they arrived at the All England Club for the men’s Wimbledon finals this afternoon, but according to a body language expert, their appearance speaks volumes about their relationship dynamic.

“This very charming and unequivocal role-reversal by William and Kate showed beyond doubt how much the new era of monarchy will be based on equality rather than traditional status,” Judi James explains.

Prince George, 11, and Princess Charlotte, 10, also attended the games alongside their parents, dressed in their Sunday best as they greeted officials. Kate has been patron of the All England Lawn and Tennis Club, also known as the AELTC (which organises the day-to-day running of the prestigious tournament), since 2016.

The family stepped out at Wimbledon on Sunday

Judi, speaking on behalf of VBET (www.vbet.co.uk), believes it was clear this was “Kate’s event,” with William and their children “very much her ‘plus ones’.”

As the family arrived at SW19, Kate was shown confidently greeting officials and engaging in lively conversation. William, meanwhile, walked behind with George and Charlotte, “very much bringing up the rear,” says Judi.

Far from any sign of tension, Judi observed that William’s choice of outfit – a perfectly tailored blazer, tie and pocket square – appeared to be a subtle homage to the occasion and to his wife.

“His outfit showed loyalty and respect,” she said.

Charlotte got into the game (Image: WireImage)

“Dressing for the occasion like this emphatically showed total respect for his wife and an ongoing desire to please her. Royal men tend to dominate the style mood of any event they appear at, but William’s unique outfit here looked like an homage to both Wimbledon and to his wife.”

In her striking cobalt blue dress, Kate took centre stage as she chatted with ease and introduced her family. “There was an air of increased confidence here as she instigated conversations and turned occasionally to her family to explain details and introductions,” Judi adds.

Meanwhile, William’s body language projected a calm and supportive presence.

Kate and Charlotte were thrilled by the tennis (Image: Stephen Lock / i-Images)

“He looked like a very compliant and proud ‘plus one’ to his wife here, with his hands clasped in front of his torso as he chatted. His eyelid-stutters and cut-off rituals hinted at a more passive approach than his confident and very popular wife.”

Judi also noted that this dynamic is particularly significant for the monarchy’s future.

“He even seems happy walking in her shadow. For him, it seems a matter of utter pride,” she adds.

The Princess also attended Wimbledon solo on Saturday, presenting the trophy at the women’s final.

She sported her ‘ Wimbledon bow’ – a brooch featuring the tournament’s iconic colours – which it’s believed she has worn every time she has visited Wimbledon.

Associate Editor Tom Bryant reflects on meeting Masterchef star Gregg Wallace who opened up about his fears over losing his job during an extraordinary interview in late 2023

The Mirror’s Tom Bryant opens up about meeting Gregg Wallace(Image: Tim Merry/Daily Mirror)

After I spent a morning in Gregg Wallace’s company, I felt like I needed a lie down. Meeting him to record an episode of my podcast, he was – at first – everything I had expected him to be: brash, extrovert and very loud.

In fact, he was not unlike his persona on BBC show MasterChef, with his booming voice and cockney cackle of a laugh. But after a few hours with him in late 2023 – and a very revealing interview – I came away with a very different perspective of the former Peckham greengrocer. Namely: how has this clearly troubled man with a host of demons risen to the top of the TV pile and stayed there for so long?

Under-fire: Gregg Wallace has been axed from Masterchef(Image: Pixel8000)

It’s pertinent now as his career lies in tatters amid a swirl of accusations. This week alone we learned that 50 more people have made claims about him to BBC News.

Most accuse him of inappropriate sexual comments. Eleven women accuse him of ­inappropriate sexual behaviour, which he denies. If the claims against him are true, you can see in a heartbeat why he was relieved of his job as MasterChef co-host, a role he had since 2005.

When I met him, I found it hard to comprehend how he coped in the glare of the public eye. The answer was that he didn’t.

During our recording in the basement of a private members’ club in Soho in London’s West End, he talked about how being on TV exacerbated his mental health struggles.

It was a candid chat. But there was a niggling thought at the back of my mind that things wouldn’t end well.

I couldn’t put my finger on it – and I still struggle to – but 20 months later, the situation has well and truly imploded. He had revealed how the more famous he got, the worse his anxiety grew. He told me: “I used to not be able to go on holiday without getting anxiety attacks.”

At one point, Gregg looked me in the eye as he said how he lived in constant fear his career could end at any moment.

He said: “Why was I always scared of losing my job? Why was I always scared of losing my house? Why was I always scared of being poor?”

Being on telly made his anxiety levels soar. “TV is terrible for someone with anxiety,” he said. “I’ve had the same PA for 12 years. She went, ‘My word, you picked the wrong profession.’”

His stint on Strictly was a disaster. BBC bosses were so worried they got a therapist for him mid-series.

He said: “I was having a tough time. I was really stressed – so badly that the side of my face broke out into a rash, like cold sores.”

Gregg Wallace: worried about losing his job(Image: PA)

He told me his fourth wife Anna pleaded with him for them to quit the UK and live in Italy, asking him: “Is this worth it?”

A lot of his issues stemmed from a childhood blighted by abuse. Aged eight, he was sexually assaulted by a babysitter’s husband. Gregg told me: “I didn’t tell anybody at the time. I did tell my mum when I was older but she didn’t seem to want to know.”

He said of the abuse: “It was quite a horrendous situation for a young boy.”

Clearly, none of this could excuse some of the appalling behaviour heis now accused of.

There are some who may question why Gregg was on TV in the first place given his fragility. But mental health problems should not preclude you from your chosen career.

And I’m told that producers ­recognised he needed help and assigned him a full-time welfare specialist over the past six months.

This week he claimed to have received a formal autism diagnosis. Gregg, 60, said on Tuesday: “My neuro-diversity, now formally ­diagnosed as autism, was suspected by colleagues across countless seasons of Master-Chef. Yet nothing was done to ­investigate my disability or protect me from what I now realise was a dangerous environment for 20 years.”

Autism charities have reacted with fury to these comments, with one saying the condition is “not a free pass for bad behaviour”. Emily Banks, founder of neurodiversity training body Enna, said: “Being autistic is never an excuse for misconduct.

“It doesn’t absolve anyone of responsibility and it doesn’t mean you can’t tell right from wrong.”

But as one executive on a rival channel told me: “This isn’t about whether Gregg has autism.

“This is about what MasterChef knew about the wronged women over the years, and whether they just turned a blind eye.”

We now have to wait and see if the long-awaited MasterChef review into the saga provides the answers when it comes back on Monday.

A Beckham family feud has been hinted at for months but it seems that it has come to breaking point with family members unfollowing each other on social media

David Beckham and his son Romeo were seen at the football match(Image: AFP via Getty Images)

David Beckham and Romeo have been seen looking tense as they broke cover for the first time after the a row with Brooklyn blew up on social media.

The father and son duo looked deep in thought as they got together to watch David’s Inter Miami play against Nashville SC at Chase Stadium in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on Saturday. The sighting of the pair comes just just days after Cruz and Romeo blocked their brother Brooklyn and his wife Nicola Peltz on Instagram – as their severed ties deepened.

David looked as smart as ever in a navy suit paired with a blue shirt along with a matching tie. While 22-year-old Romeo went for a more casual look in a grey Snoop Dog T-shirt and green camouflage cargos as he finished off his look with a smart Rolex watch.

David and Romeo went to the game in Florida(Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Romeo seemingly had a dig at brother Brooklyn on Friday just a few hours after it was noticed he had started unfollowing him and sister-in-law Nicola on Instagram. The model posted a picture of Justin Bieber’s new song Walking Away as he commented “Yup”, looking like he agreed with the lyrics.

Fans had hoped for a reconciliation between the family after Brooklyn posted a tribute to his sister Harper on her birthday.

A friend said Brooklyn was ‘as confused as everyone else’ about the apparent blocking. “The first they heard about it was when it was being reported,” a source told The Sun of Brooklyn and Nicola’s reaction/

Some of the Beckhams have unfollowed each other on social media(Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Despite the unfollowing saga, Brooklyn and Nicola are still following his parents Victoria and David.

A rumoured fallout among the famous family was seemingly confirmed when Brooklyn made a very public statement by refusing to attend any of his dad’s 50th birthday celebrations this year. He then snubbed a slew of family occasions from Father’s Day to the huge moment his dad was given a knighthood.

However, Brooklyn appeared to find his voice when it came to sister Harper’s birthday as he managed a brief tribute to her on his Instagram page.

It was reported the fallout was down to Romeo dating model Kim Turnbull – who had a brief relationship with Brooklyn. Romeo’s romance – which is now at an end – was said to have riled both Brooklyn and his wife Nicola.

Kim addressed the situation last month and insisted she has only ever had a friendship with Brooklyn and that there was nothing to worry about. Sharing a statement on her Instagram page, she said: “I’ve avoided speaking on this topic to prevent adding fuel to the fire, however it’s come to a point where I feel the need to address it so I can move on.

“I will not continue to receive harassment or be embarrassed on the basis of lies, to fit a certain narrative. I have never been romantically involved in ANY capacity at ANY point with the person in question.

“Nothing between us has occurred further than a school friendship at age 16. I would like to remove myself from the ongoing conversation & set the record straight for the sake of everyone involved.”

Kim had been at the centre of the fall out after it was reported that Nicola claimed that she felt uncomfortable around her. Sources close to Nicola reportedly said that Kim had dated Brooklyn when they were teenagers but this has since been denied by Kim herself.