Author: bang5

  • Loose Women’s Andrea McLean 24 hours from death as common illness turns sinister

    Loose Women’s Andrea McLean 24 hours from death as common illness turns sinister

    Loose Women’s Andrea McLean has opened up about how if she hadn’t have gone to hospital while battling pneumonia and sepsis, she believes she would have died

    Andrea McLean
    Andrea McLean opens up about heath scare (Image: Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

    Former Loose Woman Andrea McLean has opened up about how she was 24 hours from death after battling pneumonia and sepsis. The 55-year-old feels she has a second chance at life and that if she hadn’t made it to hospital, she would not have made it.

    And the mum-of-two believes her ordeal last Christmas has made her “re-evaluate my entire life”. She said: “I didn’t realise how severe my illness was at the time. But the doctors had told my husband, Nick, that had I not got to hospital when I did, had we waited another 24 hours to call for help, I may not be here now.”

    The drama began on the day after Boxing Day and came after a bad bout of flu that had “just not gone away.” She says: “I got up to go to the bathroom and just fell to the floor. By the time the paramedics arrived they said my blood pressure was so low they had to stabilise me before moving me.

    “Our bedroom is in the loft and they couldn’t get the stretcher around the tight bend, but eventually I managed to slide down the stairs, and was rushed to hospital. What happened over the next few weeks changed my life forever.” Andrea said that she had been feeling unwell in the 18 months leading up to last Christmas

    Andrea McLean
    Opening Up: Andrea McLean on her health woes(Image: Getty Images)

    She says: “I’ve had Covid three times and suffered long covid which left me perpetually exhausted and with an underlying weakness so I seemed to pick every little bug up. I haven’t felt quite right for a very long time, so when my husband and daughter contracted that nasty flu going around in December, I of course caught it too.

    “But it lingered with me. I just couldn’t shift it, and it all came to a head the morning I fell to the floor. My blood pressure was 60/40 – it is still very low now – and I think my body just gave up.” She says she was in and out of hospital throughout January but it was a “blur”.

    Andrea adds: “It was only a few weeks after I got home that I realised the magnitude of what had happened – that if I hadn’t gone into hospital that day, I may not be here now.”Earlier this month, she paid A&E another visit after collapsing from getting out of bed ‘too fast’. And Andrea says: “I am still not back to full strength, and my blood pressure is still very low. I recently had another fall – again the result of getting up too quickly. Unfortunately, this time I fell flat on my face and ended up sporting a bruiser of a black eye.”

    She says the biggest learning from the experience has been reassessing her outlook on life She adds: “There are rarely second chances in this life, so as I began to regain my strength I knew I had to seize the day and focus on what I really want to do.

    :I very nearly died.” Andrea said she needed to listen to her body more .”That scary, horrible moment was a turning point, it has led to now and I am feeling really positive about where I am going.”

    Andrea McLean is appearing at Showtime for women in business on May 1st in London.

  • Denise Welch’s Loose Women colleagues issued plea to star after embarrassing’ photos

    Denise Welch’s Loose Women colleagues issued plea to star after embarrassing’ photos

    Speaking up about the photographs in a recent episode of Loose Women: The Podcast, Denise Welch revealed she had a certain habit when she used to enjoy a night on the tiles

    Denise Welch
    Denise opened up about a certain habit she had on a night out (Image: ITV)

    Denise Welch has revealed that her colleagues on Loose Women begged her to make a change after she was pictured in “embarrassing” paparazzi photos.

    On an episode of Loose Women: The Podcast, the actress, who is about to mark 13 years of sobriety, spoke candidly about a certain habit she used to indulge in during her partying days.

    In a frank confession about what she described as a “medical issue”, Denise admitted that she found it “hilarious” at the time. However, she acknowledged that she was “usually the only person in the world ” who was laughing.

    On an episode of Loose Women: The Podcast, the actress, who is about to mark 13 years of sobriety, spoke candidly about a certain habit she used to indulge in during her partying days.

    In a frank confession about what she described as a “medical issue”, Denise admitted that she found it “hilarious” at the time. However, she acknowledged that she was “usually the only person in the world ” who was laughing.

    As a result, Denise ended up in “embarrassing” paparazzi shots, prompting her Loose Women colleagues to offer her some advice for one “terrible” reason.

    No caption
    Denise revealed that she found the habit “hilarious”(Image: Dave Benett/Getty Images)

    Denise explained: “I always had what I considered to be a medical issue, which I named ‘compulsive flashing disorder’, that when I was out on a night out, I, usually the only person in the world, thought it was hilarious to flash my boobs.”

    “And there are many pap shots, embarrassing now, of me flashing my bra, and the girls here at Loose Women used to say, ‘Denzy, because of your compulsive flashing disorder, would you please just invest in some good underwear because it was always really terrible.”

    The ex-Coronation Street star went on to say that her bras were typically “grey, beige,” and while she sees herself as someone who wears Agent Provocateur lingerie, she’s “sadly” not, in reality.

    Denise, who reportedly started drinking after suffering from clinical depression, has been open about her battle with alcohol in the past, revealing last year that she almost broke her sobriety due to a health incident.

    Denise Welch
    Denise appeared in “embarrassing” paparazzi photos(Image: ITV)

    Speaking to the ADHD Chatter podcast, she explained that she’d taken tablets for ADHD, expecting to feel more focused, but the expectations didn’t match the reality, reports the Mirror.

    Describing her experience, she explained: “So, I thought I’m going to take this tablet and by the time I leave our London apartment, I’m going to have vacuumed everywhere and I’m going to have thought, right, for once I really want to settle down to that bulk of affairs that I’ve ignored since I was 18-years-old.”

    Denise further admitted the unfortunate aftermath: “An hour later I wanted a drink and a cigarette for the first time in 11 years and it was horrendous how it affected me. Had I not been so many years into (it) and so secure managing my sobriety it would have been a very, very dangerous tipping point for me.”

    Separately, the Soldier Soldier star shared her thoughts with Heat magazine regarding Loose Women’s new competitor ‘Vanessa’, the Channel 5 show led by ex-This Morning host Vanessa Feltz.

  • ROYAL RATS AT IT AGAIN! HARRY AND MEGHAN ‘PUMPING UP’ BROOKLYN BECKHAM AND NICOLA PELTZ TO ‘BETRAY’ THEIR FAMILIES IN DEVASTATING ‘JUDAS MANTLE’ PLOT! EXPERTS WARN POWER COUPLE AGAINST MIMICKING DISGRACED SUSSEXES’ CATASTROPHIC CAREER COLLAPSE AND REPUTATION SMASHING STRATEGY – IS HOLLYWOOD ON THE BRINK OF ANOTHER FAMILY FEUD FUELED BY THE DUKE AND DUCHESS OF DELUSION?!

    ROYAL RATS AT IT AGAIN! HARRY AND MEGHAN ‘PUMPING UP’ BROOKLYN BECKHAM AND NICOLA PELTZ TO ‘BETRAY’ THEIR FAMILIES IN DEVASTATING ‘JUDAS MANTLE’ PLOT! EXPERTS WARN POWER COUPLE AGAINST MIMICKING DISGRACED SUSSEXES’ CATASTROPHIC CAREER COLLAPSE AND REPUTATION SMASHING STRATEGY – IS HOLLYWOOD ON THE BRINK OF ANOTHER FAMILY FEUD FUELED BY THE DUKE AND DUCHESS OF DELUSION?!

    London, UK – A chilling new report from venerable royal expert Lady Colin Campbell has sent shockwaves through the celebrity world, revealing a truly scandalous plot: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are allegedly “encouraging” Brooklyn Beckham and his wife Nicola Peltz to publicly turn on their own families, mirroring the very strategy that saw the Sussexes’ own reputations utterly “smashed.”

    Lady C’s explosive revelations paint a disturbing picture of Harry and Meghan, dubbed the “Duke and Duchess of Delusion,” actively trying to lure another high-profile couple into their “deviant boat” of public familial betrayal. “I am hearing very disturbing reports that Megan and Harry are encouraging Brooklyn and Nicola Peltz Beckham to do a Judas on his parents,” Lady Colin Campbell declared, an “emulation of the Sussex’s unedifying example.”


    The ‘Judas Mantle’: Harry and Meghan’s Blueprint for Ruin

    Lady C did not mince words in describing the Sussexes’ own path of destruction. She starkly reminded the public how Meghan “turned on her father,” Thomas Markle, whose praises she allegedly “sang until she met Harry,” only for it to suit her to “turn him off into the living embodiment of King Lear.” Harry, in turn, “followed suit,” giving “insight into how a disordered and petulant drug-addled ingrate performs as he unwarrantedly and unfairly demonizes his father when previously, i.e. pre-Megan, he also sang his praises.”

    This horrifying template, warns Lady C, is precisely what Harry and Meghan are now urging Brooklyn and Nicola to adopt. It’s a “Judas mantle,” a betrayal of the Fifth Commandment to “honour thy father and thy mother,” no matter how “appalling parents are.” The motive, she chillingly suggests, is self-preservation: Harry and Meghan, “two middle-aged vultures,” would “doubtless enjoy having another high-profile couple take the heat off them.”

    The strategy, as outlined by Meghan’s estranged sister Samantha Markle, who experienced firsthand the public trashing of her family, is clear: to “diffuse the public criticism and point fingers at the Beckhams… they just want to normalize this behavior.” It’s a desperate attempt for Harry and Meghan not to “be alone in that deviant boat.”


    The Beckham-Peltz Power Struggle: A Volatile Mix

    While the allegations are sensational, Lady C cautions that Brooklyn and Nicola have, so far, resisted the temptation to go public with any family grievances. The young couple reportedly ran into Harry and Meghan at a dinner party and have since formed a connection, with the Sussexes allegedly “leaking” their willingness to offer “guidance.” However, Nicola Peltz, known to be “very ambitious” and “very hungry to be an A-list actress,” is also part of a “very family-orientated” Peltz clan.

    This creates a fascinating dynamic: a “power struggle” between the “more famous and more prestigious Beckhams” and the “richer and more powerful Peltzes” over which family will “predominate.” David Beckham himself once had a temporary rift with his own father, suggesting that internal family squabbles are not uncommon, even among the most famous.

    Lady C’s hope is that the Peltz family’s inherent “respect for family values will hold fast,” preventing the young couple from “mimicking the repellent example” of Harry and Meghan. As of now, neither Brooklyn nor Nicola has publicly uttered a word against the Beckhams, and if they know what’s good for them, they never will. Publicly trashing family, Lady C asserts, “is the way to destroy yourself publicly.”


    The Cost of Betrayal: A Destroyed Reputation

    The warning for Brooklyn and Nicola is stark and uncompromising. Lady C unequivocally states that Meghan “made a huge mistake in trashing publicly her father and her husband’s family,” a blunder that has been obvious since 2020. She has, in effect, shown the “template for destroying yourself publicly” – trash everyone else, and “you end up being seen as the trash that you are.”

    In today’s public sphere, “you can’t be a public figure and liked when everybody knows that you are a despicable human being.” This, Lady C argues, is precisely the fate that has befallen Meghan Markle, who, despite her efforts to project an image of authenticity, is seen through by a discerning public.


    Brooklyn’s Blunders and the Lessons of Royal Discretion

    Beyond the family feud, Lady C offered scathing criticism of Brooklyn and Nicola’s public persona, particularly their perceived lack of substance. Their recent “Glamour magazine” interview, where Brooklyn struggled to identify Nicola’s love languages, was dubbed a “study in vacuity.” Lady C asserted that Brooklyn “had no brains” and Nicola not only “has clearly no brains but she’s also showing that she has rather too big an ego.”

    Brooklyn, born into a famous and wealthy family, has repeatedly shown himself to be a “talentless fool,” despite numerous attempts at careers in cookery and other fields. He has mistakenly assumed that “privileges are entitlements” and that his famous parentage automatically equates to “specialness.” This delusion, coupled with his seeming “complete thrall” to Nicola – highlighted by his adoption of her surname, becoming Brooklyn Peltz Beckham – makes him “very unattractive” to many.

    The lesson, Lady C argues, is clear, and it’s one the senior Royal Family has long understood: discretion. “It is better to be thought a fool than open up your mouth and remove all doubt,” she declared. By avoiding interviews and keeping their private lives private, the royals successfully conceal “failings” and “inadequacies.” This stands in stark contrast to Harry and Meghan’s strategy, which has only served to expose their own perceived defects to the world.

    As Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz navigate their high-profile lives, the shadow of the Sussexes’ catastrophic missteps looms large. Will they heed the dire warnings and avoid the same “slippery slope,” or will Hollywood witness another A-list family tear itself apart in a blaze of public recrimination, with Harry and Meghan cheering from the sidelines? The world watches to see if another “Judas mantle” will be embraced.

  • HARRY’S HEALTH HORROR: UNCONSCIOUS PRINCE RUSHED TO HOSPITAL AMID EXPLOSIVE ADDICTION CLAIMS! MEGHAN’S BROTHER FEARS DUCHESS ‘COOKED UP’ DEMISE FOR NETFLIX, AS INSIDERS REVEAL SUSSEXES’ MARRIAGE IN FREEFALL – IS THIS THE END FOR THE ROYAL REBEL?

    HARRY’S HEALTH HORROR: UNCONSCIOUS PRINCE RUSHED TO HOSPITAL AMID EXPLOSIVE ADDICTION CLAIMS! MEGHAN’S BROTHER FEARS DUCHESS ‘COOKED UP’ DEMISE FOR NETFLIX, AS INSIDERS REVEAL SUSSEXES’ MARRIAGE IN FREEFALL – IS THIS THE END FOR THE ROYAL REBEL?

    Hollywood, California – The world watches with bated breath as explosive new reports surface about Prince Harry’s alarming health, painting a grim picture of a man on the precipice. Shockwaves are reverberating from Montecito to Buckingham Palace following sensational claims that the Duke of Sussex was found unconscious by his own bodyguard and subsequently rushed to hospital for an undisclosed emergency. This terrifying incident has reignited long-standing fears about Harry’s alleged struggles with addiction and sparked a furious debate over the true state of his marriage to Meghan Markle.

    In an astonishing intervention, Thomas Markle Jr., Meghan’s estranged brother, has weighed in with a series of truly incendiary accusations. Reacting to the news, Markle Jr. speculated darkly, hinting at a sinister plot: “If I had to take one guess at this it would be that maybe Megan and Doria cooked up a little something on the stove along with those bath salts and maybe left it for Harry.”

    He didn’t stop there, brazenly suggesting that Harry might now be “no use to Megan anymore,” fueling the rampant divorce rumours and speculating on Meghan’s alleged motives. “Maybe there’s no money in the settlement for the divorce,” he chillingly added, “let’s make a new Netflix series and story out of Harry’s demise.” This is an unprecedented level of familial betrayal, painting a devastating portrait of Meghan’s alleged ruthlessness.


    Meghan’s Alleged Coldness: A Husband Under The Bus?

    The sensational claims from Thomas Markle Jr. have been echoed and amplified by royal commentator Peedina, who asserts that Meghan “just does not care about her husband.” According to Peedina, the Duchess is entirely consumed by her career, “preparing to make a case for herself to be in a stronger position,” even if it means “to put Harry under a bus.”

    “She knows how to look after herself,” Peedina stated emphatically. “She’s not someone who is known to really care about other people and what they want. She never puts herself in a position to support and compromise… that is what she has done in the past, that’s what I believe she continues to do.”

    The stark contrast between Harry’s reported decline and Meghan’s burgeoning public profile, with her focus on “launching new products” and “social media,” speaks volumes, according to observers. While Meghan posts about her idyllic life, “the story around Harry is completely different,” suggesting a disturbing disinterest in her husband’s welfare.


    The Haunting Specter of Addiction: Unaddressed Demons

    The most chilling aspect of the unfolding drama centers on Harry’s long-suspected struggles with drink and drugs. Peedina’s direct contention is that these issues, which have “plagued Prince Harry since he was a young teenager,” have “absolutely not gone away.”

    “Why are all these stories coming out by legitimate reporters, expert royal experts, saying things [that] you don’t get a lot of clarity, you don’t really get concrete information, you just know he’s struggling, he wants to go back to the UK, he’s not well?” she queried. The terrifying answer, she believes, lies in Harry’s own admissions.

    “I believe Harry has used something or is doing something that he himself has told us he does when he’s not well, he resorts to doing things to help numb his emotions because he doesn’t know how to cope,” Peedina revealed. The stark reality, she argues, is that Harry has “never been to a rehab where he had to address his addictions” and has “never been in a position where he’s overcome all the trauma that he has gone through.”

    Indeed, Harry himself has openly spoken about his past substance use in his memoir Spare and during interviews with Oprah Winfrey, framing it as a coping mechanism. Now, isolated and seemingly without purpose, commentators fear he is reverting to old habits. “This is a man who is alone on an island,” Peedina stated, expressing deep concern for his current psychological state.


    The Media ‘Cover-Up’ Conspiracy: Who’s Protecting Harry?

    Amidst these shocking revelations, questions are being fiercely asked about why the full extent of Harry’s alleged struggles isn’t being widely reported by mainstream media outlets, particularly in the United States. While strict UK privacy laws and Harry’s penchant for suing financially embattled newspapers offer some explanation for the British press’s reticence, the silence from the typically aggressive American tabloids like TMZ is deafening.

    One royal observer has outright accused TMZ of being “compromised,” alleging that it’s “part of the Murdoch empire,” which also owns UK tabloids like The Sun and The Times. The explosive claim? That an “order has come down from high to just go easy on Prince Harry,” implying a deliberate media blackout orchestrated from the very top.

    Beyond potential media collusion, a more poignant reason for the perceived silence may lie in a deep-seated fear within royal circles: a profound concern for Harry’s mental health. “There has always been this real fear about Harry’s mental health, and they don’t want to be blamed if something goes wrong,” a source revealed. The potential fallout of a public mental health crisis for the Duke is too severe to contemplate, leading to a cautious, almost protective, approach from those who know the gravity of his situation.


    William vs. Harry: A Future King’s Purpose vs. A Rebel’s Regrets

    Adding to the Sussexes’ spiraling woes, a recent US Weekly cover story, despite its supposed pro-Harry stance, starkly highlighted the growing chasm between the brothers. Titled “Harry and William: Worlds Apart,” the article concedes that while William is “preparing for the throne,” Harry is “in America searching for purpose.” The damning admission? “The brothers haven’t spoken in years and their lives couldn’t be more different.”

    The article’s attempt to suggest William has “borrowed a page from his younger brother’s playbook” by taking selective time away from the public eye has been vehemently dismissed as “desperation” and “nonsense.” William’s measured approach to family life long predates Harry’s departure and is seen as a mark of his commitment, not imitation.

    “Harry has lost his purpose,” lamented Peedina. “Anybody who cannot find purpose in life, they struggle, they struggle with the whole meaning of life.” This agonizing realization, coupled with seeing his brother “doing it so successfully,” is “torturing him,” she believes.

    The US Weekly piece even, remarkably, admits Harry’s “regrets not about leaving the firm but about all that was lost in the shuffle,” including his relationships with William, his father, old friends, military titles, and patronages. Five years after “Megxit,” Harry “has yet to figure out his next act outside of royalty,” with the burden of earning money reportedly falling squarely on Meghan.


    Meghan’s Grip and Harry’s Desperate Need for an Intervention

    The narrative emerging is one of a Prince increasingly isolated, adrift, and trapped. “Harry is the one who was trapped,” a royal observer asserted, drawing a poignant contrast to Harry’s past claims about his brother. The blame for his current predicament, according to many, lies squarely with his wife.

    “He listened to that woman, he listened to her, and she’s the one that told him what it’s going to be,” Peedina declared, adding that Harry “doesn’t want to wake up to the truth, to the reality because it hurts him.”

    The chilling accusation is that Meghan is actively “making things worse for him,” being “consumed about all these superficial things” while Harry “is just going downhill very quickly.” Moreover, there’s a deep concern that Meghan is “using the children as pawns” for social media and financial gain, a practice Harry himself is reportedly “definitely against” but seemingly powerless to stop.

    The potential long-term damage to Archie and Lilibet is immense. “They are losing a connection to royalty, they are losing the connection to their cousins… these children will never have that,” Peedina warned, predicting “real problems that are going to come up later in life for Harry.”

    Ultimately, the consensus among many royal watchers is that “Harry needs help.” He is seen as a man “begging for an intervention,” but tragically, the family he alienated has “given up.” The distance between William and Harry “continues to grow wider,” with “no plans for a reconciliation.” The story of Prince Harry, once a beloved royal rebel, is spiraling into a tragic tale of isolation, addiction, and a life unmoored. The question now remains: how much further can he fall before his royal family, or indeed, the world, intervenes?

  • PALACE IN PANIC: KATE’S ‘NEAR-DEATH’ SHOCK REVEALED! PRINCESS OF WALES ‘FORTUNATE TO BE SPEAKING OF RECOVERY’ AFTER UNSEEN ORDEAL BEFORE CANCER BATTLE! ROYAL SECRETS, HARRY’S ‘SPITEFUL’ INVITE, AND THE KING’S NETFLIX SHOCKER EXPOSE MONARCHY IN UNPRECEDENTED TURMOIL!

    PALACE IN PANIC: KATE’S ‘NEAR-DEATH’ SHOCK REVEALED! PRINCESS OF WALES ‘FORTUNATE TO BE SPEAKING OF RECOVERY’ AFTER UNSEEN ORDEAL BEFORE CANCER BATTLE! ROYAL SECRETS, HARRY’S ‘SPITEFUL’ INVITE, AND THE KING’S NETFLIX SHOCKER EXPOSE MONARCHY IN UNPRECEDENTED TURMOIL!

    The very foundations of the British Monarchy are being shaken to their core this week, as an astonishing new revelation about Catherine, the Princess of Wales, threatens to redefine public understanding of her recent health battles. Shockwaves are reverberating through royal circles and across the nation following reports that the Princess was “close to death” even before her devastating cancer diagnosis last year.

    This bombshell news, initially hinted at by insiders and now sensationally brought to light by the Daily Mail‘s highly-connected Royal Editor, Rebecca English, paints a far grimmer picture than previously imagined. It reveals an underlying medical crisis that predated her cancer, a condition that left her teetering on the brink and, according to sources close to the Palace, is still very much a factor in her slow, measured return to public life.


    The Unseen Ordeal: Kate’s Perilous Predicament

    “She’s been to hell and back over the last year and a half,” writes Rebecca English, quoting an anonymous insider with deep knowledge of Catherine’s struggle. This harrowing insight confirms what many have long suspected: the Princess’s January abdominal surgery was not merely a routine procedure that unexpectedly uncovered cancer. Rather, it was the culmination of a severe, pre-existing health crisis.

    “As I have previously revealed,” English states, “the princess was seriously unwell in the run-up to her surgery in the first place… I can say that from what I understand she is fortunate to even be speaking of recovery.” This startling admission suggests an ordeal far more profound than the public was led to believe, a silent battle waged behind palace walls where Catherine’s life hung precariously in the balance.

    The revelation underscores the immense toll her recovery is taking. Despite her radiant appearance at recent events like Trooping the Colour and the Order of the Garter, sources stress that her “physical recovery is still a work in progress.” The sudden, last-minute absence from Royal Ascot, initially attributed to a “communication error,” is now understood as a stark reminder that “the princess was really very poorly not so long ago.” It’s a sobering counterpoint to the persistent public expectation for her immediate and full return to royal duties.


    The Royal Vacuum: Trust, Transparency, and Tumbling Conspiracies

    The Palace’s carefully managed narrative around Catherine’s health has always been a tightrope walk between privacy and public reassurance. However, this latest revelation has reignited a fierce debate about the monarchy’s communication strategy and its impact on public trust.

    “You can’t necessarily trust what’s coming out of the palaces,” remarked one commentator, echoing long-held frustrations among some royal observers. The sentiment is that the public is “not told the full story,” leading to a dangerous “vacuum” that is all too readily filled by damaging speculation and conspiracy theories. Last year, when Prince William unexpectedly pulled out of a memorial service, the public was told “nothing’s wrong,” even as “Catherine was very close to death.” This perceived lack of full disclosure, observers argue, paved the way for wild, baseless rumours ranging from relationship breakdowns to bizarre claims of body doubles.

    While acknowledging the Princess’s undeniable right to medical privacy, the question remains: how much transparency is necessary in an age of instant information and rampant online conjecture? Historically, the Royal Family, exemplified by the late Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, adopted a stoic approach, battling illnesses in private without seeking public sympathy. This was “very much of their time,” observers concede, but in today’s media landscape, where “people demand” information, a little more openness “is not a bad thing.”

    King Charles III’s more transparent approach to his own cancer diagnosis has been seen as a step in this direction, albeit with limits. Yet, the persistent secrecy around Catherine’s pre-cancer illness highlights an ongoing challenge for the monarchy: navigating a modern world where traditional discretion can breed distrust.


    Harry’s ‘Spiteful’ Invitation: A New Royal Rift?

    As if the health drama wasn’t enough, the monarchy is also grappling with a fresh PR headache courtesy of Prince Harry. Reports indicate that the Duke of Sussex has extended an invitation to King Charles and Prince William to attend the next Invictus Games, set to take place in Birmingham.

    On the surface, this might appear to be an olive branch. However, insiders and commentators are quick to point out a glaring issue: the proposed dates for the games’ closing ceremony clash directly with Queen Camilla’s 80th birthday celebrations.

    “This is a very, very spiteful thing,” fumed one royal expert, suggesting Harry’s move is a calculated attempt to “beat them and to want win” by forcing his father and brother into an impossible choice. The invite, crucially, was reportedly revealed to the press before being formally sent to the royal private secretaries, leading to accusations that Harry is once again “trying to jump his family” and use the media to his advantage. The omission of Queen Camilla and Catherine from the invitation list further fuels speculation of a deliberate snub. This latest manoeuvre is seen by many as yet another attempt by Harry to paint himself as the victim, blaming his family for their perceived lack of support.


    The ‘King William’ Controversy: An Insult to Charles?

    Adding another layer to the royal family’s current woes, an increasingly prominent public discussion has emerged around Prince William’s future reign. This includes speculative articles detailing his vision for a “slimmed-down monarchy,” changes to his coronation, and a greater reliance on figures like Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh, and Zara Tindall.

    While anticipatory discussions about the heir’s future are not uncommon, the timing of these reports, particularly while King Charles III is still undergoing cancer treatment and actively performing his duties, has been branded “jolly rude” by some commentators.

    “It’s people who are around him [William] and I think that they should have been quiet,” stated one furious royal observer, lambasting the media for publishing “details of they don’t like this is what he’s doing they don’t like people on the balcony because there’ll be too few and anyway it’s very old-fashioned.” The sentiment is that these alleged “friends of William” are prematurely undermining King Charles’s ongoing efforts and legacy. While William will undoubtedly implement his own vision as king, the current public dissection of his future plans is seen by many as disrespectful to a monarch who is working “astonishingly well despite everything that’s happening.”


    Charles’s Netflix Coup: A Royal PR Masterstroke?

    Amidst the swirling controversies, King Charles III has orchestrated a surprising strategic move that could be a significant PR victory: partnering with Netflix for a documentary featuring Idris Elba. This collaboration, focused on the 50th anniversary of the Prince’s Trust (now the King’s Trust), comes as a profound shock to many, given the monarchy’s tumultuous history with the streaming giant, particularly the controversial portrayal in The Crown.

    Yet, what appears to be a reconciliation is, for some, a brilliant manoeuvre. “This is actually a bit of a victory for King Charles over Megan and Harry,” declared one royal expert. Harry and Meghan had famously hoped Netflix would be “on their side, not the side of the royal family,” leading to speculation that this documentary is a deliberate reassertion of royal authority and narrative control.

    The choice of Netflix over the BBC is also seen as highly significant. The Royal Family has reportedly been “furious” with the BBC in the past, particularly over their perceived preferential treatment of Harry and Meghan. By choosing Netflix, the King and Elba are likely to “have more impact” globally, securing a platform that reaches far beyond the “dying broadcaster” that some now label the BBC. This daring move indicates a new, proactive approach from the King to shape public perception and champion his charitable work on a global stage, potentially bypassing traditional media outlets that have, at times, been perceived as hostile.


    The British Monarchy is navigating an extraordinarily turbulent period. From the harrowing, previously untold details of the Princess of Wales’s near-death experience to Prince Harry’s seemingly calculated provocations and the ongoing power plays within the institution, the Windsors find themselves under an intense spotlight. As they strive to balance tradition with modernity, privacy with transparency, and personal struggles with public duty, the coming months will undoubtedly prove crucial in shaping the future trajectory of the Crown.

  • GB NEWS IN CHAOS: ON-AIR MELTDOWN EXPOSED! SACKED HOST SUES FOR ‘RACISM’ CLAIMING ‘FREE SPEECH’ HYPOCRISY AFTER BRAVERMAN SLUR! IS THIS THE END OF BRITAIN’S EDGIEST NEWS CHANNEL AMIDST ALLEGATIONS OF DOUBLE STANDARDS AND PRODUCTION NIGHTMARES?

    GB NEWS IN CHAOS: ON-AIR MELTDOWN EXPOSED! SACKED HOST SUES FOR ‘RACISM’ CLAIMING ‘FREE SPEECH’ HYPOCRISY AFTER BRAVERMAN SLUR! IS THIS THE END OF BRITAIN’S EDGIEST NEWS CHANNEL AMIDST ALLEGATIONS OF DOUBLE STANDARDS AND PRODUCTION NIGHTMARES?

    GB News, the self-proclaimed “home of free speech,” finds itself embroiled in a fresh storm of controversy, facing a high-stakes lawsuit for racism and unfair dismissal from one of its former star presenters. This dramatic legal battle unfolds just as the channel is reeling from an astonishing on-air meltdown by a senior journalist, raising serious questions about the network’s internal stability, its commitment to its founding principles, and its very future.

    At the heart of the legal dispute is Albie Amankona, a charismatic conservative known for his anti-racism advocacy, whom sources describe as “incredibly talented” and even a potential “prime minister one day.” Amankona, who presented the channel’s flagship Saturday night show, The Saturday 5, was sensationally sacked after a heated exchange during a live broadcast.


    The Braverman Storm: Racism Accusation Rocks Live TV

    The explosive moment occurred when Amankona, during a discussion hosted by the now-departed Darren Grimes, fiercely accused former Home Secretary Suella Braverman of being “racist and a thoroughly bigoted woman.” The accusation stemmed from Braverman’s controversial comments regarding “British Pakistani men” and their “problem with grooming,” which Amankona labelled “a racist comment.”

    The on-air clash was immediate and intense. “You cannot sit on this show and call someone a racist,” the host interjected, attempting to shut down the escalating debate. But Amankona stood firm, asserting his belief that “people like that should not be in the Conservative Party.”

    Following the broadcast, the fallout was swift and decisive. Braverman lodged a complaint with the station, and Amankona was presented with a stark ultimatum: apologize or be fired. He refused, and true to the station’s word, he was gone.


    Free Speech Hypocrisy? Sacked Host Fights Back

    Now, Amankona is fighting back. Taking to X (formerly Twitter), he announced his legal action against “the so-called home of free speech,” declaring: “Look at what others on that channel have said and how they’ve been treated then look at what I said and how I was treated. The difference is like night and day. If you claim to stand for freedom of speech, fairness and equal treatment, you should be held to your word. GB News must be held accountable.”

    Amankona has even produced “receipts” – video evidence of a white presenter on GB News making similar accusations of bigotry and racism against a left-wing figure, Diane Abbott, without facing any reprimand. “She is a bigot, she… is what a bigot looks like,” the clip shows another host stating, drawing a stark contrast to Amankona’s swift dismissal. He argues that this disparity in treatment points to a deeply troubling double standard, particularly concerning how “black on air members of staff” are treated differently from their “white on air members of staff.”

    This legal challenge comes as a profound test for GB News, a channel launched with the promise of “edgy” content and a commitment to “doing things differently.” Critics of Amankona’s sacking argue that for a “free speech channel,” such “knee-jerk reactions of constantly sacking people just go against everything that the station was meant to be about.” Indeed, the question is being forcefully posed: “If you claim to stand for freedom of speech… you should be held to your word. GB News must be held accountable.”


    The Divide: Loyalty, Lawsuits, and the ‘Ofcom Communists’

    Amankona’s legal action has predictably divided opinion across the political spectrum. Some, like the “stark naked brief” on X, mock his claim of racism, arguing he “fails to do his research… and then cries racism,” especially given Baroness Casey’s recent report confirming the disproportionate involvement of Pakistani men in grooming gangs. They suggest his actions are more “negligent and/or incompetent” than indicative of racial discrimination. The involvement of Jolyon Maugham’s Good Law Project in supporting Amankona’s case has also raised eyebrows in certain circles.

    However, others, including former GB News launch presenter Alex Phillips, express deep concern. While acknowledging Amankona’s sometimes “nasty” accusations of racism against other public figures (including Phillips herself), the fundamental question remains: should GB News be sacking presenters for airing controversial opinions, even those deemed offensive or legally precarious? “I really worry about GB News just sacking people because they say something that goes against the ideology of the channel,” states Phillips, concluding pointedly: “That is not a free speech channel, is it?”

    The channel’s defenders, like regular contributor Suzanne Evans, highlight the ever-present threat of Ofcom, the media regulator often dubbed the “Ofcom communists” by some. Evans acknowledges that Ofcom “watches GB News much more closely than it does some of the other channels,” and that “a lobby group… is determined to have GB News taken off air and will write thousands of letters at the tiniest little hint of any kind of breach of the rules.” This constant scrutiny, she argues, forces contributors to be “a little bit careful” and avoid saying anything “too outrageous” that could land the channel “in massive amounts of hot water,” such as calling someone a racist without demonstrable proof.

    GB News, however, is not backing down. A spokesperson for the channel has stated: “Mr Amankona’s claim is misconceived, without merit and being robustly defended.” This signals that the legal battle is likely headed for an employment tribunal, where the station’s commitment to “free speech” will be put under an intense microscope.


    Production Meltdown: On-Air Chaos Exposes Deeper Rifts

    Adding to the broadcaster’s woes, a shocking on-air meltdown by its respected Home and Security Editor, Mark White, exposed glaring technological and production failures within the channel. During a live breaking news report on Iranian strikes against US air bases, White visibly struggled, asking for his face to be removed from the screen while he attempted to read crucial information. The situation escalated when his microphone was apparently left on after he thought he was off-air, capturing his frustrated rant at the production team.

    “I don’t know if you heard at the end but Mark White was very angry,” observed one host, expressing sympathy for White. “He’s such a brilliant, capable journalist… that looks like a man who doesn’t really want to be working for that company much anymore.”

    This incident, described as a public “humiliation,” highlights deeper internal rifts. Some speculate that “a lot of the people who work behind the scenes, especially the production guys, actually hate everything GB News is about,” suggesting a deliberate attempt to sabotage on-air talent. The embarrassing technical glitches, four years into the channel’s operation, raise serious questions about its professional standards and its ability to support its journalists, leaving them “constantly being let down by the technology and the production teams.”


    A Precarious Future?

    As GB News battles a high-profile racism lawsuit, faces accusations of free speech hypocrisy, and grapples with internal production chaos, its future appears increasingly precarious. The channel’s once-unapologetic stance on robust debate is being questioned, and its very identity as a platform for diverse, unfiltered voices is under threat. Whether it can weather this storm and re-establish its credibility remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the fight for its soul is far from over.

  • ROYAL BOMBSHELL: Harry’s ‘Sly’ Invictus Trap EXPOSED! King Charles Under Pressure As William Declares CHILLING ‘INDIFFERENCE’ – The Sussex Rift Is NOW PERMANENT! PLUS: Meghan Caught In ‘Web of Lies’ Over Harry Romance & Netflix Delivers ULTIMATE Snub To Montecito Duo!

    ROYAL BOMBSHELL: Harry’s ‘Sly’ Invictus Trap EXPOSED! King Charles Under Pressure As William Declares CHILLING ‘INDIFFERENCE’ – The Sussex Rift Is NOW PERMANENT! PLUS: Meghan Caught In ‘Web of Lies’ Over Harry Romance & Netflix Delivers ULTIMATE Snub To Montecito Duo!

    A fresh wave of shockwaves is ripping through the Royal Family today, as Prince Harry stands accused of a “disgusting,” “sly” attempt to publicly “entrap” King Charles and Prince William. His audacious move: announcing an invitation to the next Invictus Games to his royal relatives – a grand finale set to clash spectacularly with Queen Camilla’s 80th birthday celebrations. This isn’t just a misstep; it’s being branded a cynical manipulation, designed to force the Royals into looking like the “bad guys” if they dare decline.

    But the most chilling revelation to emerge from the Palace is perhaps the most definitive sign yet of the irreparable chasm between the warring brothers: Prince William has reportedly moved beyond anger and into a state of utter “indifference” towards Harry. This, alongside bombshell new details about Meghan Markle’s wildly inconsistent tales of meeting her Prince and a monumental snub from Netflix, paints a grim picture for the Sussexes’ future.


    Harry’s Desperate Trap: Invictus Invitation Sparks Royal Fury

    The latest saga began with Harry’s very public announcement that he would be extending an “olive branch” to the Royal Family by inviting them to the 2027 Invictus Games. An email invitation, followed by a formal one, is supposedly due later this month. The only snag? Harry broadcast this invitation to the newspapers before he even told William and Charles!

    This brazen PR stunt immediately drew fire. “I feel this was a disgusting attempt by Prince Harry to try and force King Charles and Prince William’s hand,” fumed one royal commentator. “When will he learn? These types of negotiations with your family should not be done in public.”

    The timing is particularly pointed. The Invictus Games finale is set to coincide with Queen Camilla’s milestone 80th birthday, putting the senior royals squarely “between a rock and a hard place.” As representatives of the Armed Forces, Charles and William are traditionally supportive of veterans. Yet, this public ultimatum leaves them little room to maneuver without appearing unsupportive of a cause Harry champions.

    “If they turn it down, he can play victim again,” asserts one insider, flatly labeling Harry “a sly little [expletive].” Despite Invictus Games supporting a “small cadre” of veterans rather than a massive global event, Harry’s desperation for “validity” for his pet project is evident. Whispers suggest that a “weak” King Charles might “relent” and attend early in the games, desperate to be “seen to do the right thing.” Prince William, however, is a different story. “I’ll eat my hat if William turns up to the Invictus Games,” declared a source, confirming the widespread belief that the future King will not be swayed by such transparent tactics.

    This calculated leakage to the media, even before formal invitations are sent, screams volumes to Palace insiders. It “absolutely proves the point” of the Royal Family’s long-held concerns about Harry’s “main priority in life now is to play a media game, a PR game… why he is not to be trusted and should never be trusted again.” His “olive branch” comes only “on his terms,” a stark reversal of how genuine reconciliation should occur. It’s time for the Royal Family to “set up boundaries,” especially as Meghan is unlikely to bring the children unless full police protection is granted – a demand already denied and highly unlikely to be met.


    Prince William’s Chilling Indifference: The Final Nail in the Coffin?

    Perhaps the most devastating news for Prince Harry comes directly from the heart of the Palace itself. Recent reporting in The Sunday Times, widely considered an official briefing from Palace staff, carries a truly damning message: Prince William has given up on Harry for good.

    This isn’t just speculation. The article quotes Jason Knauf, formerly a key advisor to both Sussexes and now William’s “most important, treasured advisor” as head of the Earthshot Foundation. His contribution signals that the information is coming “directly from William.”

    The report outlines the “gulf” between William and Harry, who have been “strangers” since Queen Elizabeth’s funeral in September 2022. While William once “raged at his brother’s outbursts” after the publication of Spare, burning with anger, there has been a “marked recent shift.”

    “What has struck me the most recently is that he just doesn’t mention it at all,” a friend of William’s revealed. “It used to be that the family stuff was taking up a lot of space in his head… but he’s not letting it get to him at all anymore. It is a change, it’s sad, but it’s a much healthier space for him to be at.”

    The key word here is indifference. To be indifferent is to no longer care, to be beyond love or loathing. William, after enduring the agonizing prospect of potentially losing both his father and his wife to severe illness within weeks, has shifted his focus. His wife’s health, his father’s health, the weight of the Crown, and his children now occupy his mind. Harry, at this point, has become nothing more than “something he laughs at and then kind of… puts away and then doesn’t think about all that much anymore.”

    This chilling indifference means there is “no future here” for the relationship Harry once had with his brother. It’s over, and Harry “is the one who did that.” Furthermore, Harry’s “amusement” about his children, Archie and Lilibet, retaining their HRH titles so they can become working royals in the next reign has been met with “bemusement” in royal circles. “Roles for Archie and Lilibet as working royals are unlikely,” the report states bluntly. It’s a stark reality that Harry, still perhaps “drinking the Kool-Aid” from his decision to leave, has yet to fully grasp.


    Meghan’s Web of Deceit: Three Versions of a “Love Story”

    As the brothers’ rift deepens, Meghan Markle finds herself embroiled in a fresh controversy, this time over her own conflicting narratives about how she first met Prince Harry. A viral clip, titled “Revealing the Narc,” starkly highlights how Meghan has offered three different versions of her “love story” with Harry in three major interviews:

    2017:

        “I didn’t know much about him… I had one question: ‘Is he nice?’”

    2021:

        “I never looked up my husband online. No, I never Googled him.”

    2022:

      “I asked if I could see his [Instagram] feed… that’s your homework.”

    These wildly contradictory statements have left royal watchers scratching their heads, asking: “Which Meghan do you believe? 2017, 2021, 2022, or none of them?”

    The most plausible, and damning, interpretation, according to critics, is the Instagram version. “That seems to me very Meghan,” one commentator noted, highlighting Meghan’s alleged obsession with social media and curating an image. The idea that she “never Googled” or only cared if Harry was “kind” is dismissed as “complete BS.” The brutal truth, they claim, is that Meghan was “trying to move in those circles,” “trying to find a famous guy.” With her role on Suits waning and acting prospects drying up, she “had to find some sort of rich guy, and Harry was a fool apparently who was went along with it.” It’s a harsh assessment, but one that resonates with many who believe Meghan is “allergic to the truth.”


    Netflix Delivers Crushing Blow: King Charles Teams Up in Ultimate Sussex Snub!

    In a move that’s being interpreted as a colossal “piss off” to the Montecito duo, Netflix – the platform that once seemingly sided with the Sussexes – has announced a major new collaboration: King Charles III and Idris Elba are teaming up for a documentary marking 50 years of The King’s Trust.

    This is a monumental shift. King Charles previously harbored “huge issues” with Netflix due to The Crown‘s unflattering portrayal of him, even refusing to attend events if cast members from the show were present. Yet, now he’s “very much changed his tune,” realizing Netflix is “the biggest game in town” for global reach.

    For Harry and Meghan, who once “hoped and for a period believed that Netflix had changed its allegiance towards them,” this is a crushing blow. It signals that for Netflix, “business is business,” and the bottom line triumphs over any perceived loyalty to “Team Sussex.” This is further underlined by the recent People magazine cover featuring a “resplendent” Kate Middleton – a publication that Meghan and Harry had “worked absolutely hardest to get on side.” The message is clear: the Crown is back in the game, and the Sussexes’ influence is waning fast.


    The Future of the Monarchy: A Radically Scaled-Down Reign?

    Amidst the personal dramas, whispers of a dramatically different future for the monarchy under King William are also emerging. Plans for a “massively scaled-back” coronation, a lack of intention to move into Buckingham Palace, and a general reduction in the traditional “pomp and ceremony” are all on William’s mind. Figures like Zara Tindall and Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh, are expected to step up, rather than the likes of Harry and Meghan.

    While this “royalty with a little R” approach aims to make the monarchy “more endearing,” there’s a “danger… of the overcorrection.” If William pares back traditions “too far,” he “could sort of lose sort of the character of the Royal Family altogether,” warns one commentator. The unique appeal of the British Royal Family, compared to other less prominent monarchies, often lies in its rich history and ceremonial grandeur. An interesting question also arises: will William still be Head of the Church of England if he scales back the coronation so drastically?

    The path ahead for the Royal Family is undeniably complex, navigating personal betrayals, evolving public expectations, and a drastically altered media landscape. For Harry and Meghan, their choices appear to have led them down a cul-de-sac of isolated ambition, while for William, the focus remains firmly on duty, family, and the quiet, steady progression of the Crown. The once inseparable brothers now stand on opposite sides of an unbridgeable chasm, defined by William’s chilling new indifference.

  • This Morning viewers ‘cringe’ as Alison Hammond is accused of ‘manhandling’ co-host Dermot O’Leary

    This Morning viewers ‘cringe’ as Alison Hammond is accused of ‘manhandling’ co-host Dermot O’Leary

    ‘Imagine if it was the other way round’

    This Morning viewers were today left ‘cringing’ as presenter Alison Hammond was accused of ‘manhandling’ her co-host Dermot O’Leary.

    Friday’s show saw the ITV duo welcome pundits Nick Ferrari and Ashley James into the studio to give their takes on topics in the news. Included among the issues they ruminated on today were whether medics should take time away from work during heatwaves, and who is supposed to cough up when it comes to weddings.

    But as Alison and Dermot transitioned into another segment about wedding ceremonies, one particular aspect of Alison’s conduct was spotted by viewers – and they didn’t consider her behaviour ‘appropriate’.

    Alison Hammond and Dermot O'Leary look serious
    Friday’s show saw Alison Hammond and Dermot O’Leary back in the This Morning studio (Credit: ITV

    This Morning today: What did Alison Hammond do?

    Returning from an ad break, Alison was seen bopping along to Vengaboys’ 2000 hit Uncle John From Jamaica.

    But as Alison was busting out her best moves, and bumping her hips into her presenting partner’s, Dermot O’Leary seemed a little reluctant to join in.

    However, within moments, Alison intervened physically as the following item – a call in from viewers seeking wedding advice – began.

    And it was at this point that users on X complained about Alison’s demeanour.

    Dermot O'Leary makes his point sitting next to Alison Hammond on This Morning today
    There was a lot of chat about weddings on This Morning today (Credit: ITV)

    Alison Hammond and Dermot O’Leary news

    While Alison took her seat on the sofa as the first caller made their point, Dermot appeared to linger. But he didn’t remain standing up for long.

    After a few seconds, Alison took hold of her TV colleague’s left arm with her right hand, her pink-nailed fingers tugging at Dermot’s elbow.

    With Alison appearing to pull down, Dermot then planted himself too. And even though the moment seemed innocuous enough, social media users reacted with incredulous shock.

    Alison Hammond pulls on Dermot O'Leary's arm
    Alison Hammond pulls on Dermot O’Leary’s arm (Credit: ITV)

    How viewers reacted

    “Alison why are you manhandling Dermot? #thismorning,” one person asked on X, but without tagging Alison’s handle in so she might actually read the comment.

    If a male presenter grabbed a woman like that they’d be cancelled.

    “Omg cringe,” simpered another user. Chuckling, they continued: “If a male presenter grabbed a woman like that they’d be cancelled lol #thismorning.”

    Dermot O'Leary and Alison Hammond speak to the cameras
    Dermot didn’t seem all that bothered by Alison tugging at his arm (Credit: ITV)
    And that hypothetical situation was also invoked by another seething social media user who chose to refer to Alison only by her surname.

    They spluttered: “Look at Hammond, pulling Dermot to sit down. Imagine if it was the other way round… #thismorning.”

  • Michelle Keegan defended as she’s trolled over revealing swimsuit snap three months after welcoming baby

    Michelle Keegan defended as she’s trolled over revealing swimsuit snap three months after welcoming baby

    Ignore the haters, Michelle!

    Michelle Keegan had fans rallying round with support after she was trolled over her jaw-dropping swimsuit snaps, just three months after giving birth to her baby.

    The actress, 38, became a mum for the first time in March after she gave birth to a baby girl, Palma. She shares the tot with husband Mark Wright, also 38.

    Since then, the showbiz couple – who married in 2015 – have been updating fans on the new chapter in their lives. And this week, Michelle sent her fans into a frenzy after she donned a rather revealing swimsuit. But it seems haters are gonna hate…


    The TV star looked sensational in her summer snaps (Credit: ITV

    Michelle Keegan stuns in swimsuit after birth of baby

    Earlier this week (June 16), Michelle Keegan took to her Instagram to share several snaps of her modelling an item from her brand Orfila Bee.

    The TV star posed up a storm in a brown cut-out swimsuit that showed off her fantastic figure. Michelle styled the swimsuit with a straw cowboy hat and a pair of sunglasses.

    Smouldering to the camera, Michelle wore her famous chocolate locks in bouncy waves that cascaded down her shoulders.

    And, as expected, plenty of Michelle’s fans were left swooning over the post and rushed to the comments section to share their thoughts.

    However, others were not too impressed and claimed Michelle was making other mums feel bad due to how good she was looking.

    Michelle Keegan posing
    Michelle got plenty of people talking (Credit: Instagram Story)

    Michelle’s followers slam TV star

    “Kudos Michelle for making every young mum feel and look like [bleep], bravo, didn’t you do well,” fumed one person.

    Someone else added: “Nice you to make other mums grumpy after birth.”

    A third wrote: “Just a message to any mum out there who’s just had a baby and your body didn’t snap back like this, remember you just grew a baby for nine months. Don’t matter what you look like, you made a baby, enjoy it.”

    Michelle urged to ‘ignore haters and negativity’

    Following the backlash, Michelle’s fans were quick to defend the new mum. “Really? Comment not needed,” said one person followed by an eye-roll emoji.

    A second said: “You look amazing as always enjoy your time with your gorgeous baby girl and ignore all the haters and negativity.”

    Someone else gushed: “Michelle looks amazing. So unfair on these comments. It takes time to feel okay mentally regardless of physical looks. So what if she has snapped back, she may not feel that way. She is not promoting ‘snap back after having a baby’ she is making a living.”

    She looks amazing, as she always does.

    Another follower wrote: “Wow some of the comments on here are horrible. Some women do go back to their body normal after childbirth, some women don’t.”

    They added: “But that doesn’t mean that it is okay to shame someone for wearing a swimming costume because some are clearly very jealous and bitter. I really hope Michelle ignores the nasty comments and only the good ones. She looks amazing, as she always does

  • Martin Kemp fans rally around as he issues emotional announcement about daughter: ‘My baby girl’

    Martin Kemp fans rally around as he issues emotional announcement about daughter: ‘My baby girl’

    She is Martin’s eldest child

    Martin Kemp was supported by fans after he revealed some exciting news about his daughter.

    The TV star, 63, is a proud dad to two children, Roman, 32, and daughter Harley Moon, 35. Martin shares the kids with his wife Shirlie, 63.

    And recently, Martin left fans delighted when he issued a “touching” announcement about his “baby girl” Harley.

    Screenshot of Martin Kemp looking worried
    The actor issued an emotional announcement about Harley (Credit: ITV)

    Martin Kemp reveals announcement about daughter

    On Tuesday (June 17) Martin took to his Instagram and shared a sweet photo of him and Harley Moon.

    The former EastEnders actor could be seen kissing his daughter on the head, who beamed to the camera.

    In the caption of the post, Martin shared his excitement at Harley Moon working with him on a photoshoot for his clothing brand, MJK.

    He wrote: “My baby girl @harleymoonkemp shooting my next drop of MJK clothes…. She’s the best, l love you Har!!”

    Martin's daughter Harley Moon on Loose Women
    She is Martin’s eldest child (Credit: ITV)

    ‘What a beautiful touching pic’

    As expected, Martin’s followers were left swooning over the post and rushed to the comments section.

    One person said: “That is so beautiful a true father that shows so much love don’t take for granted as some of us don’t have that. Harley and Roman you have the best parents in the world and love shines thru you are truly blessed.”

    Someone else added: “Beautiful pic so much love.” A third chimed in: “Love this! Such a great photo of you and your beautiful daughter.”

    Echoing their thoughts, another fan gushed: “Awww what a beautiful touching pic of father and daughter.”

    Martin’s daughter Harley

    Harley Moon – who usually stays out of the spotlight – has carved out a hugely successful career as a talented director and singer.

    Earlier this year, she shared a video on Instagram of her parents’ reaction to a song she penned about them, called What Good Looks Like.

    In the emotional video, the singer sat in the front seat of her car, while Martin and Shirley were in the back, as she played them her song.

    In the caption, Harley penned: “Recorded the first time playing my parents the song I wrote about them ‘What good looks like’.”

    She continued: “They really have shown me what real love is and made me so full of strength and happiness. I haven’t found that kinda love yet… but I know it’s out there.”