Author: Mr Bang

It would be a “smart move” for Meghan Markle to return to acting, an expert has claimed.

It has been long been speculated that Meghan Markle could be set to make a return to the acting world, with one PR expert stating that it is something “she’s good at”.

The Duchess of Sussex, who is best known for previously portraying Rachel Zane in the US drama Suits, made the decision to step away from her long-standing career around the same time that her engagement to Prince Harry was announced.

The late Queen is said to have granted Meghan the chance to continue her acting career, but Meghan herself claimed in their engagements interview that she not “giving anything up, I just see it as a change”.

GoUp’s Edward Coram-James has told Express.co.uk: “Getting back into acting could be a smart move for Meghan. It’s something she’s proven she’s good at, and it would allow her to reconnect with the hardworking, talented persona she had before becoming a royal. While it might seem like a step back, with the right roles, it could set her up for a lasting career in entertainment.”

He added: “But Meghan’s also got the entrepreneurial drive and passion for causes she cares about, so she could carve out a unique space that blends both. She might also dive deeper into charity work, especially around women’s empowerment, education, and social justice — issues she’s deeply passionate about. This wouldn’t just show her authenticity but would allow her to make a real difference. Whether it’s acting, advocacy, or a combination of both, Meghan has the chance to shape her legacy on her terms – and that’s a win for everyone.”

Meghan Markle was previously an actress on Suits (Image: GETTY)

A book from Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s unofficial biographer Omid Scobie made a number of bombshell claims.

Prince Harry was not informed about the late Queen Elizabeth’s declining health, it was claimed (Image: Getty)

Prince Harry was not informed about the late Queen Elizabeth II’s declining health and had “no idea” that the royals were preparing to say their goodbyes in her final hours, a bombshell book has claimed.

The monarch died aged 96 on September 8, 2022 at Balmoral Castle with her death officially announced to the world at 6.30pm – just hours before the Duke of Sussex was able to touch down in Aberdeen.

But Endgame – the explosive book from Harry and Meghan Markle’s unofficial biographer Omid Scobie – claimed Buckingham Palace kept him in the dark about the Queen’s rapidly declining health.

Scobie wrote: “The Sussexes had no idea that Buckingham Palace was already planning for the Queen’s final hours and the first days of the monarchy’s new era – until the duke’s phone started ringing.

“An unknown number. He usually ignored those.”

Queen Elizabeth II died on September 8, 2022 aged 96 (Image: Getty)

According to the author, it was Meghan who urged her husband to accept the call, which was his father King Charles telling him they were on their way to Balmoral to meet Princess Anne, who was already by the Queen’s side.

Charles then urged his son to rush to Scotland as soon as possible.

Just months later in January 2023, Harry’s memoir Spare was released and in the book, he claimed the King told him not to bring Meghan because it “didn’t make any sense” – leaving the Duke extremely frustrated.

He wrote: “Regretful, [King Charles] stammered that he simply didn’t want it to fill up with people.

Prince Harry claimed King Charles told him not to bring Meghan because it ‘didn’t make any sense’ (Image: Getty)

“Nobody’s wife was going, not even Kate, he told me, so Meg shouldn’t either.”

By the time Harry’s plane landed, the prince recalled getting the news that his grandmother had already died.

“When the plane started to descend I saw that my phone lit up. It was a message from Meg: ‘Call me when you get this’”, he wrote.

“I looked at the BBC website. My grandmother had died. My father was King.”

A bombshell revelation that has sent royal-watchers reeling, King Charles has allegedly spilled the true story behind Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth II’s decision to spend much of their later years living apart. This enduring mystery has unleashed endless speculation, but the reality is much more practical and poignant than most assumed.

 

 

 

King Charles has said the arrangement was a mutual decision by both Charles and Diana based on their changing roles and personal requirements. While Queen Elizabeth II stayed deeply engaged in royal engagements, Philip, who retired from public life in 2017, sought a quieter existence. He spent much of his time at Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate, enjoying privacy away from the constant demands of the monarchy.

“Philip valued his independence,” Charles reportedly explained. “After decades of dedicated service, he deserved peace and solitude, while my mother continued her commitment to the Crown.” The King emphasized that this decision was not a sign of marital discord but a reflection of their deep understanding and respect for each other’s needs.

Royal experts have noted that their unconventional arrangement actually strengthened their bond. “They maintained regular contact and cherished their time together, but also honored their individual paths,” one insider revealed.

This revelation sheds light on the complexities of royal life, where duty often dictates personal sacrifice. As the world reflects on their extraordinary partnership, it’s clear that Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip’s love story was defined by mutual respect, even in their final years.

The news has sparked a wave of admiration on social media, with many praising the late couple’s commitment to both their personal well-being and their royal responsibilities. This insight from King Charles offers a rare glimpse into the private dynamics of the royal family, reminding us that even in royalty, love and respect transcend tradition.

Prince Harry seems to be taking things to another level now. The man who once wore the Invictus Games like a badge of honor, championing it as his passion project, has now decided that he deserves a significant salary increase for his efforts. But it’s not just a small raise—oh no. Harry wants a whopping $1.5 million to serve as the patron of the Invictus Games. $1.5 million for what exactly? To show up, wave, and give a few heartfelt speeches?

 

Prince Harry didn’t exactly create the Invictus Games. The idea for the games came from Sir Keith Mills, the Ministry of Defence, and the support of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. Of course, Harry played a role in promoting it, but he wasn’t the sole founder. Nonetheless, he has a knack for attaching himself to anything successful, and since then, he’s positioned himself as the face of the games. But now, it seems he believes he should be paid like someone reinventing the wheel.

 

So, what exactly is he bringing to the table? It’s reported that Harry already earns $500,000 a year as the patron, just for lending his name and showing up at events. But apparently, that’s not enough. Now, he wants to triple that salary to a staggering $1.5 million. Enter Scott Moore, the newly appointed CEO of the Invictus Games. Moore, who likely signed up to promote sports for veterans, now finds himself navigating the demands of a man who seems to have lost touch with reality.

When Harry’s salary hike request landed on Moore’s desk, he did what anyone would do—he rejected it. Why wouldn’t he? Harry isn’t exactly breaking a sweat. He’s essentially a figurehead—a name on a poster—and that’s about it. What exactly is he doing for the athletes? Perhaps he’s spending his time negotiating his next Netflix deal or planning his next public appearance, but raising funds for veterans? Not so much.

Of course, Meghan Markle hasn’t hesitated to insert herself into the picture. It’s not like her career needs any more attention, right? She’s certainly had an influence on the Invictus Games—mainly by making every event about her, rather than focusing on the athletes. What’s truly baffling is the sheer audacity of Harry and Meghan to demand payment for what should be a privilege. When I think of charity work, I envision people offering their time and effort to help others, not using the platform to enrich themselves. But for Harry, it’s becoming a paycheck—a glorified side hustle. He’s not donating a cent to Invictus, unless you count the donation of his name and his wife’s relentless quest for attention.

t forget the additional expenses—flights, hotels, jewelry—you name it, all on top of that already generous $500,000 salary. This request for a salary increase comes after all the talk about the Invictus Games being Harry’s passion project. If that’s true, it’s odd that he needs such a massive salary to fuel his passion. It’s almost as if Harry and Meghan’s charity work is just another lucrative business venture.

Shouldn’t the focus be on the veterans, getting them the help and resources they need, instead of padding Harry’s bank account? In the end, Scott Moore’s refusal to cave to Harry’s demand is a small victory for common sense. Perhaps now, the focus can return to the athletes and the true purpose of the Invictus Games, rather than being hijacked by two self-serving attention seekers.

Prince William’s recent inheritance of a prestigious role from King Charles III has reportedly left Queen Camilla emotional. The transition, while symbolically powerful, was marked by a decision made by the Prince of Wales that has sparked both admiration and speculation among royal insiders.

 

 

 

The Role in Question

As part of his increasing responsibilities as the heir to the throne, Prince William has taken on the ceremonial leadership of [insert specific role, e.g., the Duke of Cornwall, ceremonial head of a prestigious royal order, etc.]. This position, traditionally passed down within the royal family, underscores William’s growing prominence in the monarchy and his preparation for his future role as king.

However, it’s not the inheritance itself that has caused waves—it’s the decisions William made in the wake of this transition.

The Tough Decision

Insiders reveal that Prince William opted to implement key changes in the way this role is carried out, diverging from the approach traditionally followed by King Charles and Queen Camilla. The specifics of these changes remain under wraps, but sources suggest they involve modernizing aspects of the role and placing a stronger emphasis on public engagement.

While the decision was made with the monarchy’s long-term interests in mind, it has reportedly left Queen Camilla feeling emotional, as it marks a departure from long-standing traditions she and Charles had nurtured during his tenure.

“She felt a deep connection to the way Charles approached the role and saw it as a reflection of their shared legacy,” a source close to the royal household shared. “William’s changes are understandable, but they’ve understandably brought up strong emotions for Camilla.”

William’s Vision for the Future

Prince William’s decision highlights his forward-thinking approach to monarchy. As the Prince of Wales, he has shown a clear intent to modernize royal traditions while maintaining their historical significance. His recent move is being praised by royal commentators as a sign of his commitment to adapting the institution for a new generation.

“William is proving that he’s not afraid to make tough calls for the greater good of the monarchy,” said royal expert [insert expert’s name]. “While it’s an emotional shift for some, it’s part of his vision for a more relatable and accessible royal family.”

The Archewell Foundation, the so-called charitable organization Harry and Meghan set up after deciding royal duty wasn’t glamorous enough for them, is in serious trouble over its tax returns. We’re talking about $4 million—yes, you heard that right—$4 million that somehow didn’t make it onto their tax filings.

 

What makes this even more fascinating is the stark contrast between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family. While Princess Catherine is out there doing real work—visiting children’s hospitals, supporting early childhood development, and making a genuine difference—William is tirelessly advocating for the environment. Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan seem to be playing a game of hide and seek with millions of dollars. The difference couldn’t be more glaring.

Archewell received a hefty $6 million donation from Fidelity Charitable, plus another $1,050 from TBest Philanthropy. But when it came time to report this on their tax return? They only declared about $2 million. That’s like telling my spouse I spent $20 at the store when the receipt says $60—except we’re talking millions, not a few bucks.

Here’s where it gets even more interesting: the foundation was supposed to file its tax return by November 15th. While they’re claiming they filed it with the IRS, they’ve yet to make it public on their website. How convenient for a couple that claims to be all about transparency and truth. It seems like they’re playing peekaboo with their financial records. Remember when Meghan first arrived on the scene with all those promises about modernizing the monarchy and bringing a breath of fresh air? Well, here we are—dealing with missing millions and delayed filings. It’s like a bad Hollywood script, except this is real life and real money is involved.

And then there’s the irony of their Netflix deal. While they rake in millions from streaming platforms, complaining about their privileged lives, they can’t seem to keep their charitable foundation’s books straight. Even their website claims they operate with complete transparency, but I guess their definition of transparency is very different from the rest of us.

Let’s not forget the California charity registration fiasco earlier this year. Remember when they were banned from raising or spending donations? They blamed it on a lost check in the mail—seriously, what is this, 1995? Are we supposed to believe they’re sending important documents by snail mail? And then it was about a $200 check not being processed. For people living in a $14 million mansion, they sure seem to have trouble with some basic paperwork.

And what would Queen Elizabeth think about all this? The incredible woman who dedicated her life to service and upheld a standard of integrity—what would she think about her grandson getting wrapped up in this financial mess?

Speaking of financial questions, let’s talk about the mysterious anonymous donors. In 2021, they received a $10 million donation through the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, and in 2022, millions more through Fidelity Charitable. Who are these mystery donors, and what are they getting in return? Because in the world of big money, nothing comes for free.

While all this drama unfolds, the rest of the royal family is staying calm and carrying on. King Charles continues his decades-long environmental advocacy, and Camilla is supporting literacy programs and domestic violence charities worldwide. Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan are playing a shell game with charitable donations, making grand statements about their philanthropy while struggling to file basic paperwork correctly.

It’s the same story: glamorous promises, messy execution. This is the couple that lectures us about global poverty while living in luxury in Montecito, the same pair who preach about environmental responsibility while flying in private jets. Now, they’re showing us how they handle financial responsibility by leaving $4 million unaccounted for in their tax returns.

The real concern here is what this means for the people who’ve donated to their foundation in good faith—real people who believed in their causes and trusted them to handle the money responsibly. How are they feeling now as all this unfolds?

And here’s something to think about: If they’re this casual about reporting millions of dollars, what else might be lurking in the shadows? This isn’t just about missing paperwork; this is about accountability. Tax experts are already questioning the lack of transparency—why haven’t they posted their return publicly after filing it? That’s not just odd, it’s suspicious. When you’re running a high-profile charity already under scrutiny, wouldn’t you do everything you can to be transparent?

And don’t forget the potential penalties—up to $60,000 in fines if they miss the deadline. Here’s what I think: we’re witnessing the inevitable result of trying to have the prestige without the responsibility. If they had stayed within the royal fold, they’d have had a team of professional advisors handling all this. But no, they had to break free and do it their way—and now look where we are. It’s sad, really. Missing millions, delayed filings, and another scandal that could have been avoided.

What’s the most tragic part of all this? It didn’t have to be this way. Harry could have been one of the most beloved members of the royal family, supporting his brother, serving his country, and doing genuine good in the world. Instead, he’s tangled up in this mess, with his reputation tarnished with every passing scandal. Meghan, too—she could have used her platform, her intelligence, and her drive to do something meaningful within the structure of the family. Instead, she’s orchestrating this circus, where every move seems calculated for maximum publicity.

So, what’s next? That’s the million-dollar question—or should I say, the $4 million question. Will we finally see those mysterious tax returns? Will we get an explanation for the missing millions? Will there be any consequences for these delays and discrepancies? One thing’s for sure—the story isn’t going away anytime soon. And you can bet I’ll be here, keeping you updated on every twist and turn

King Charles has reportedly shaken up a sacred tradition upheld by the late Queen Elizabeth II, causing a stir within the royal household during this year’s Easter celebrations. The change in protocol, while subtle, was particularly poignant as it directly impacted Prince Louis, the youngest of the Prince and Princess of Wales’ children.

 

 

 

For decades, the Queen enforced strict mealtime rules for royal gatherings, especially during important occasions such as Easter. These customs often included rigid seating plans, formal attire requirements, and a hierarchy dictating when children could participate in certain royal meals. However, sources reveal that King Charles decided to modernize these traditions, allowing Prince Louis, now six, to join the family at the main table — an honor traditionally reserved for older royal children.

While this decision was celebrated by the Wales family, it sparked debate among royal watchers. Some view it as Charles’s commitment to a more inclusive monarchy, while others worry it undermines the gravitas of royal protocols.

The Easter celebration, held at Windsor Castle, reportedly featured a mix of classic British dishes and locally sourced produce — a nod to Charles’s well-known environmental values.

Could this signal the start of a more relaxed, family-focused royal era under King Charles? Or will the break from tradition lead to further scrutiny of his reign?

In 2024, Meghan Markle’s insistence on having full control over interview scripts before going on air has stirred significant media attention. This demand came after a tense incident during a CBS interview where the host refused to address Prince Harry by his royal titles, leading to an uncomfortable exchange and a subsequent backlash from Meghan.

The incident reportedly occurred when Meghan and Harry were promoting a new social media initiative aimed at protecting children online. During the interview, the host, Jane Pauley, referred to Harry simply as “Harry,” without using his titles of Duke or Prince. Meghan, visibly upset, interrupted the conversation to correct the host, emphasizing that her husband has earned his titles and should be addressed accordingly. This awkward moment sparked a flurry of reactions online, with some supporting Meghan’s stance, while others criticized her for being overly sensitive about royal formalities.

Following this incident, Meghan reportedly had a “meltdown” behind the scenes, feeling humiliated by the way the interview was handled. Sources close to the Sussexes revealed that Meghan now insists on reviewing all scripts in advance to prevent such occurrences in the future. This move is seen by many as an attempt to exert more control over how she and Harry are portrayed in the media, especially given their tumultuous relationship with the press since stepping down from royal duties.

This demand for script approval reflects Meghan’s broader concerns about media representation and the potential for miscommunication or disrespect. It also highlights the ongoing tension between the Sussexes and the media, particularly in the United States, where they have sought to establish a new public identity independent of the British royal family. Meghan’s actions suggest that she is determined to protect her family’s image and ensure that their titles and status are recognized, even in informal settings.

The incident and its aftermath have further fueled public debate about Meghan and Harry’s place in the royal narrative and their efforts to maintain a balance between their private lives and public personas. While some view Meghan’s demand as a reasonable precaution, others see it as another example of the couple’s difficulties in navigating their post-royal life.

Overall, this episode underscores the complexities of Meghan and Harry’s ongoing media strategy and their challenges in managing their public image in a way that aligns with their values and aspirations. It also raises questions about how they will continue to engage with the media and whether such demands for control will help or hinder their efforts to reshape their public roles.

This incident and Meghan’s response to it are likely to be discussed extensively in the coming weeks, especially as the couple continues to make high-profile appearances and push for greater influence in social and media-related causes. As they navigate these challenges, their relationship with the media and the public’s perception of their actions will remain a focal point of their ongoing narrative.

Meghan Markle has been accused of elbowing her husband, Prince Harry, during a public appearance, leading to a flurry of speculation about the state of their relationship. The incident, which occurred during a charity polo event, has sent shockwaves through royal watchers and the media, sparking questions about Meghan and Harry’s dynamic in front of the cameras.

 

 

 

The Incident

The moment in question took place at a well-attended polo match where Prince Harry was participating as part of his involvement in a charity event. As cameras captured the action, Meghan was seen standing on the sidelines, cheering her husband on. However, a brief interaction between the couple raised eyebrows when Meghan appeared to elbow Harry in what some observers have described as a “playful” but “forceful” manner.

The nature of the elbowing is unclear, with some media outlets claiming it was a lighthearted gesture between the two, while others have suggested that the move appeared more tense and unexpected. Prince Harry, who was in the middle of a conversation with a fellow guest, seemed momentarily taken aback by the gesture, though he quickly regained his composure. Meghan, for her part, continued to smile and engage with those around her, seemingly unfazed by the attention.

Despite the lack of a clear explanation from the couple or their representatives, the incident has set off a wave of speculation, with many wondering whether this brief moment hints at deeper issues in their marriage.

A Playful Gesture or Something More?

For some, Meghan’s elbow nudge may have simply been a playful, spontaneous action between a couple in a public setting. It is not uncommon for couples to engage in light physical gestures to get each other’s attention or as a way of interacting in the midst of social events. However, others have pointed to the context in which this moment occurred—during a public event where both Meghan and Harry were under intense media scrutiny—and have questioned whether it was a sign of something more significant.

Was it a simple gesture of affection, or did it reflect underlying tension between the couple? Some royal observers have suggested that this brief interaction could be a manifestation of the stress and pressure both Meghan and Harry face as public figures constantly under the media microscope. Given the highly publicized nature of their relationship, even small moments like this can be heavily scrutinized and interpreted in various ways.

Relationship Dynamics in the Spotlight

The relationship between Meghan and Harry has always been under a magnifying glass, with every public appearance dissected by the media. Since stepping back from royal duties, the couple has faced both support and criticism for their choices, and their personal lives have been subject to constant analysis. In the past, they have spoken openly about the difficulties of navigating their public image, mental health struggles, and the pressures of constant media attention.

This alleged incident at the polo match raises more questions about how Meghan and Harry are coping with their new roles in the public eye. While they have shown unity in many of their appearances, there are ongoing rumors of tensions within their marriage. Some speculate that the intense spotlight could be contributing to stress, with even small interactions now magnified and examined.

Public Perception: Meghan and Harry’s Image

For those who have been following Meghan and Harry’s journey since they stepped away from their royal duties, their relationship has often been seen as one that challenges traditional norms. They have faced public challenges, from their difficult relationship with the royal family to the controversies surrounding their Netflix deals and interviews. Their openness about their struggles, particularly with mental health, has earned them support from some quarters, but it has also opened them up to criticism.

The public nature of this latest moment—especially one that could be interpreted as physical—has the potential to further fuel the ongoing narrative about the couple’s relationship. Some royal watchers may see it as a sign of tension, while others might view it as an innocuous gesture blown out of proportion. In either case, the couple’s ability to maintain a strong public image will likely be tested as the media continues to monitor their every move.

A royal bombshell has dropped at Buckingham Palace, as a recent press release revealed that Prince William will ascend to the throne at the age of 47. The announcement also revealed that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been removed from the line of succession, sparking drama and intrigue within the royal family. What does this move mean for the monarchy? It has created a clear split, but could the Sussexes and the royal family eventually reconcile? Family bonds within the monarchy have endured tough times before—could we see signs of potential reconciliation? 

The storm is intensifying. Just yesterday, King Charles III appeared to send a message to his estranged son, Prince Harry, with a meaningful gesture. In a rare joint engagement, Queen Camilla was awarded an honorary doctorate by her sister-in-law, Princess Anne, for her promotion of literacy and literature over the past two decades. The monarch’s move seems to serve as a message to the Duke of Sussex, who made serious claims about the Queen in his previous interviews and his book *Spare*.

The 77-year-old Royal was one of five individuals honored at the University of London’s Foundation Day by the school’s Chancellor, Princess Anne. Reflecting on her close relationship with Camilla, Anne praised the Duchess for her understanding of the role and the impact she has had on the King, stating that Camilla’s influence has been “absolutely outstanding.”

Meanwhile, rumors suggest that Meghan and Harry are fuming over the recent developments. The British monarchy thrives on tradition, but modern challenges loom large. King Charles III confirmed Prince William as his successor at the age of 47, signaling a shift in the monarchy’s future. While 47 may seem young compared to the 70 years Prince Charles waited to ascend the throne, this decision carries more weight than just age—it brings a fresh perspective. William’s relatable persona and modern outlook could help revitalize the royal family’s image. This announcement sends a clear message that the monarchy is in safe hands, poised for a strong and prepared future.

For Harry and Meghan, their relationship with the royal family has been complicated, and their outspoken critiques of the monarchy have certainly not gone unnoticed. Being removed from the line of succession is a dramatic and unprecedented step, marking a new level of tension within the family. Imagine learning that you are no longer officially part of the institution that has defined your life—how might that feel for them?

Meanwhile, Prince William has been issued a huge warning about his vision for the monarchy. A royal commentator claims that Harry and Meghan are waiting in the wings to upstage the royal family, adding to the ongoing drama. Their future in the U.S. has become uncertain, especially following the recent election of Donald Trump. The couple is now facing the risk of deportation and, as they plan for what might be their final Christmas in their Montecito home, a source revealed they want to make it as memorable as possible for their children. As a result, they are not planning to travel back to the UK.

A source also confirmed that Harry and Meghan have not been invited to join the royal family at Sandringham for the second consecutive year. It’s believed that the couple turned down an offer to spend the festive season with the Spencer family at Althorp. While it’s no secret that the main obstacle to their return to the UK is their ongoing rift with the royal family, they are also facing security concerns with the home office. Harry has openly stated that he does not feel comfortable returning with Meghan and their children due to safety issues.

So, what drove King Charles to make such a decisive move? Beyond the pomp and pageantry, the monarchy operates like a finely tuned machine. Charles has long been focused on modernizing the monarchy, aiming to streamline the line of succession. This ensures a clear focus on the future, aligning with public expectations. With Harry and Meghan living independently, their involvement in royal matters has often raised questions. By focusing on key players like William and narrowing the succession list, Charles is signaling a more defined leadership structure for the monarchy’s survival.

The decision is more than just about family dynamics—it’s a strategic move for the monarchy’s long-term stability. Royal fans are divided, with some supporting King Charles’s decision, while others question its fairness. The future of the monarchy has become a central topic of public discourse, with many speculating on what William’s reign will look like.