In a recent wave of sensational rumors, a story has emerged claiming that Meghan Markle is furious after alleged revelations by King Charles III regarding Prince Harry’s paternity. According to the rumors, it is suggested that DNA results supposedly prove Prince Harry is not King Charles’s biological son but rather the son of James Hewitt, a claim that has been debunked numerous times. The narrative further suggests that Harry allegedly hid this information to continue benefiting from his royal status, causing outrage and tension within the family.
However, these assertions lack credible sources and are widely recognized as unfounded. Prince Harry himself addressed and refuted such rumors in his memoir, Spare, where he clarified that his mother, Princess Diana, did not meet James Hewitt until years after his birth, thus dismantling any timelines that support these paternity theories. Hewitt, too, has repeatedly denied the claims, emphasizing that his relationship with Diana began long after Prince Harry was born.
This particular story has nonetheless spread widely, playing on public intrigue regarding the royal family’s private lives and the long-standing interest in royal family dynamics. Despite the buzz, no official statements or evidence support the notion that King Charles has made any public revelations or that Meghan has responded with anger toward these claims.
Such rumors highlight the broader issue of unverified stories that frequently emerge about the royal family, often without substantiation. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s departure from their official roles within the monarchy has only intensified public interest and, unfortunately, fueled ongoing media speculation around their lives and decisions. This specific rumor, while intriguing to some, is part of a pattern of sensational narratives that often prove to be baseless.
For now, it remains essential for readers to approach such claims with caution, as neither the palace nor credible sources have confirmed the existence of any such DNA test or any official action by King Charles on the matter.
