Kelvin Fletcher ɑnd Wife Liz Shɑre Mɑgicɑl News: Bɑby Number Five Is On the Wɑy — And Fɑns Cɑn’t Stop Smiling

Kelvin Fletcher ɑnd his wife Liz hɑve sent sociɑl mediɑ into ɑ spirɑl of joy ɑfter reveɑling thɑt they ɑre expecting their fifth child — ɑ twist so heɑrtwɑrming it feels pulled strɑight from ɑ storybook. The former Emmerdɑle stɑr ɑnd his much-loved wife, ɑdored for their cɑndid fɑmily moments ɑnd their chɑrming fɑrming show, shɑred the news with the kind of glowing delight thɑt instɑntly wins heɑrts.

For loyɑl followers, the ɑnnouncement feels both intimɑte ɑnd celebrɑtory — ɑnother luminous milestone in ɑ journey thɑt hɑs inspired thousɑnds.

A Fɑrmhouse Full of Love

Life on the Fletcher fɑrm hɑs never been quiet, especiɑlly since their ɑdorɑble twins, Mɑteusz ɑnd Vɑlentinɑ, ɑrrived ɑnd trɑnsformed their fɑmily of four into ɑ bustling, joy-filled household. Between muddy boots, bottle feeds, filming schedules ɑnd ɑn endless list of fɑrm chores, Kelvin ɑnd Liz long ɑgo mɑstered the ɑrt of juggling chɑos with ɑffection.

A close friend reveɑled thɑt their life is “busy, loud, unpredictɑble… but they ɑbsolutely embrɑce it,” ɑdding thɑt this new bɑby ɑlreɑdy feels like “ɑ gift they didn’t know they needed.”

Fɑns Melt All Over Agɑin

The moment Kelvin ɑnd Liz hinted thɑt bɑby number five wɑs on the wɑy, fɑns rushed to congrɑtulɑte them. Messɑges poured in — some tender, some teɑsing ɑbout the fɑrm growing even wilder.

One fɑn sɑid the fɑmily “grows more beɑutiful every yeɑr,” while ɑnother insisted thɑt “if ɑny home deserves ɑnother little mirɑcle, it’s theirs.”

A  TV Fɑvourite — With ɑ New Chɑpter Aheɑd

Their hit series documenting their move from city life to rurɑl chɑos hɑs become ɑ surprise fɑvourite ɑmong viewers, celebrɑted for its humour ɑnd heɑrt. With bɑby number five on the wɑy, excitement is building over whɑt fɑns might witness next.

Rumours hɑve even begun swirling thɑt the couple mɑy soon ɑnnounce something mɑjor tied to the show — though the Fletchers themselves remɑin quiet, letting the ɑnticipɑtion simmer.

A New Beginning, Rooted in Grɑtitude

Through every twist, from sleepless nights to unexpected triumphs, Kelvin ɑnd Liz hɑve shown ɑ rɑre sincerity thɑt resonɑtes deeply with ɑuɗιences.

Now, ɑs they prepɑre to welcome ɑnother child, it’s cleɑr their story is still unfolding.

This new bɑby isn’t just ɑnother ɑddition — it’s ɑ symbol of resilience, ɑ celebrɑtion of love, ɑnd the stɑrt of yet ɑnother extrɑordinɑry chɑpter.

One thing is certɑin:
the Fletcher fɑrmhouse is ɑbout to grow even fuller — ɑnd even more mɑgicɑl.

GB News star slammed as he brands King Charles’ Christmas speech ‘pointless’

Patrick Christys sparked the ire of GB News fans as he branded King Charles’ speech a “meaningless word salad”.

Patrick Christys risked the ire of GB News fans (Image: GB News)

GB News fans were up in arms as anchor Patrick Christys took aim at King Charles after his Christmas Day speech. The star – who is married to fellow GB News host Emily Carver – took to X yesterday (December 25) but risked the ire of his regular supporters as he hit out at the monarch’s “meaningless word salad”.

Christys wrote: “Bit of a meaningless word salad from King Charles there. Liked the bit about remembering veterans, but found the rest of his Christmas message a bit pointless. What do you think?” His fellow GB News colleague Adam Brooks seemed to agree, writing: “Didn’t watch the King’s speech, I’m really not a fan tbh.

“And I definitely didn’t watch the loony Green Party leader call for MORE asylum seekers either. I’ve had a nice day without politics or watching/reading those that seek to destroy our country.”

Fans weren’t happy, however, as one fumed in the replies section: “Despite his best efforts, poor Patrick can’t find anything specific in the speech to cry about, so ‘a bit pointless’ will have to do.”

Someone else said: “Nothing says Merry Christmas like going on Twitter to slag off the annual speech from our monarch.”

King Charles made his annual Christmas speech (Image: Getty)

“Bloke fighting cancer tries to give a message of hope, unity and belief to his divided and unhappy country and you chose to come to Twitter to slag him off, rather than spend time with your child on their very first Christmas. Stay classy Christys,” another snapped.

However, others seemed to agree with Christys, as one said: “Pointless is correct… time for William and Kate to lead the Royal Family.”

Another said: “I miss Queen Elizabeth II.”

“Much ado about nothing. No message really,” a third echoed.

In an explosive session that sent shockwaves through the political landscape, David Lammy, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, was ruthlessly dismantled during a fiery debate in the House of Commons. With tensions running high and tempers flaring, Lammy found himself under siege as government MPs unleashed a barrage of criticism against a backdrop of fierce partisan rivalry.

The atmosphere in the Commons was electric as Lammy rose to speak, aiming to bolster the Labour Party’s stance on international affairs amidst ongoing geopolitical turmoil. However, as he attempted to project authority and command the room, he was met with pointed interruptions and incisive remarks that quickly escalated the exchange into a full-blown confrontation.

Leading the charge was Foreign Secretary James Cleverly, whose sharp retorts and thorough questioning laid bare the vulnerabilities in Lammy’s arguments. Cleverly, armed with a wealth of statistics and a focused narrative, highlighted what he described as “flawed judgments and misguided foreign policies” propagated by Lammy and his party—accusations that elicited gasps and murmurs from the packed chamber.

As Lammy struggled to maintain his composure, it became evident that he was grappling not only with the intensity of the opposition but with the weight of expectations upon him as a key figure in the Labour movement. The stakes were high; the government’s credibility on foreign relations was under scrutiny, and Lammy was expected to deliver a compelling counter-narrative. Instead, however, he appeared caught off guard, struggling to provide satisfactory responses to the barrage of questions aimed at exposing the inadequacies of his own party’s foreign policy proposals.

The confrontation reached a boiling point when Cleverly challenged Lammy on his stance regarding national security amidst rising threats from abroad. “You can’t lead without a clear vision, Mr. Lammy! What are your plans to protect British interests on the global stage?” Cleverly’s words echoed through the chamber, leaving Lammy momentarily speechless and drawing sympathetic glances from his fellow Labour MPs seated behind him.

With parliamentary decorum rapidly melting away, Lammy attempted to regain the upper hand, diverting the conversation towards domestic challenges. However, the shifting focus did little to mitigate the onslaught he was enduring. “Your record speaks for itself, and people are not buying your distractions!” Cleverly retorted, driving home the point that Lammy’s evasive strategies wouldn’t suffice under the bright lights of accountability that demanded clarity and direction.

The urgency of the moment was palpable. Political analysts and commentators alike noted that this confrontation could have far-reaching implications for Lammy’s political future and the Labour Party’s overall strategy heading into the next general election. If Lammy is perceived as weak or indecisive in the face of serious scrutiny, it could jeopardize Labour’s prospects and hand an advantage to the ruling Conservative party, which has long been accused of mismanaging international relations.

As the session progressed, opposition MPs weighed in, some seizing the opportunity to join the fray and further dismantle Lammy’s credibility. Each attack was punctuated by raucous laughter and jeers from the Conservative benches, amplifying the feeling that the Labour leader was being thoroughly and publicly dismantled. One prominent Tory MP quipped, “If you want to see chaos on the world stage, just look at Labour’s blueprint for foreign affairs!” This remark was met with uproarious approval, underscoring the growing effectiveness of Cleverly’s strategy.

For Lammy, the day began as an opportunity to project strength but unfolded into a cautionary tale about the perils of political warfare. With each passing moment, the pressure mounted. The fixed cameras captured the flicker of defeat in his eyes as he contended with a chorus of detractors, realizing that he was not just defending a position but navigating the treacherous waters of political survival.

British vigilantes slash small migrant boats on French coastline

Britons have been filming themselves travelling to beaches in France and ‘destroying’ small boats – gaining thousands of views in the process

Sanya Burgess is an award-winning journalist whose investigations have included revealing Deliveroo was not paying the living wage to all riders, despite the company’s pledge to do so. She has also tracked disinformation and far right hate speech in the UK during the Southport riots, conspiracy theories about the attempted shooting of Donald Trump and revealed that Elon Musk was paying some of Tommy Robinson’s legal fees. She has also worked on issues relating to Big Tech and underage gambling, as well as uncovering war crimes and human rights abuses in Iran, Myanmar and the UAE – including the ‘hostage’ tapes of the detained Dubai Princess Latifa.
British vigilantes who spearheaded efforts to fly England flags across the country have launched a new anti-migrant protest – attempting to block illegal Channel crossings.

Using the term “Operation Stop The Boats”, members of the group have been filming themselves slashing small boats before they are used by migrants to cross the English Channel from France.

Posts on social media show members calling for other British men to join them in France, including making a direct appeal to football hooligans, saying “we need to make a stand”.

In one video message shared this week by a member of the Raise the Colours group – the grassroots movement that has seen flags fixed to lampposts, motorway bridges and roundabouts across England – two men are seen evoking military language and the spirit of the British fight against the Nazis in the Second World War.

Claiming to be recording from the northern French coast, one said: “Just like in the 1940s, we must take a stand, and it starts with the men of England and Britain.”

Making an appeal to “firms” – a phrase that refers to football hooligan groups – the other man added: “Our country is doing nothing. Weak government, weaker borders.

“They are doing nothing, so we need to make a stand, boys. Get the lads together, get your firms together, get the lads in the pub, get the lads down the bars, if you’re talking about it and you agree with what we are doing, give us a hand.”
The Government is under pressure to act after more than 36,000 people have crossed the English Channel in small boats (Photo: raisethecolours.org.uk/Instagram)
The Government is under pressure to tackle the issue of migration amid a record number of asylum applications, surging small boat crossings and protests at hotels housing asylum seekers.

On Monday, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood set out a package of reforms to asylum policies aimed at tackling illegal migration, telling MPs the current situation is “out of control and unfair”.

The latest videos shared by those linked to the Raise the Colours group have separately been referred to as “Operation Overlord”.

Earlier clips showed two men saying they were taking matters of illegal migration into their own hands and filming themselves stamping on and smashing a small boat’s engine.

In the clips, they refer to themselves as “patriots” and make a number of claims without evidence, such as that they are stopping “rapists and murderers” from “coming to a town near you”.
One video shared by the group (Photo: raisethecolours.org.uk/nstagram)
The flag-raising group, who have a combined 100,000 followers on X and Instagram, also posted a plea on X for donations last week, writing that they are: “STOPPING The Boats, whether the migrants or government like it or not!”

Two videos from the group have recently been shared to the 1.7 million X followers of Tommy Robinson. The far-right figure and former leader of the English Defence League, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has previously been accused of mobilising football hooligan firms in an attempt to launch anti-Muslim rallies across the country.

Separately, French media reports that the Dunkirk Public Prosecutor’s office has opened a preliminary investigation into “aggravated violence” against migrants by suspected British far-right figures.

One of the details being examined by the French prosecutor is the claim that in September, four men waving British and UK flags verbally and physically attacked migrants on the French coast. It is alleged that they told the migrants they were not welcome in England and proceeded to steal some of their belongings.

The men are not the first anti-migrant figures to travel to France in a bid to take matters into their own hands.

In September, Ukip, Nigel Farage’s former political party, posted a video to their X account showing what appeared to be sleeping migrants in France being woken by people flashing strobe lights in their faces and shouting at them.

Nick Tenconi, Ukip’s current leader, also posted a video captioned: “In Calais hunting for illegal invaders trying to cross into Britain.”

The night before the biggest performance of his life, George Clarke wasn’t thinking about trophies, scores or headlines. He was trying — and failing — to hold himself together.

The 26-year-old finalist broke down during a deeply moving appearance on It Takes Two, just hours before the Strictly Come Dancing grand final. Sitting alongside professional partner Alexis Warr, George became visibly overwhelmed after producers played messages from his family — a moment that stripped away any remaining sense of showbiz polish.

Unable to speak, he wiped away tears and quietly apologised. “Sorry… this is awful of me,” he said, his voice breaking — not from nerves, but from the weight of everything the journey has carried.

George admitted he has deliberately avoided thinking about the final, explaining that the scale of the moment has triggered a sense of imposter syndrome. For him, reaching this point already feels surreal — and he’s openly worried about the emotional crash that may come once the Strictly bubble bursts.

Viewers felt it instantly. Social media flooded with raw reactions as fans confessed they were crying along with him, praising his honesty, humility and vulnerability. “I’m emotional for George,” one wrote. Another added: “Please don’t cry — I can’t cope.” A third summed it up simply: “He is so loved.”

While bookmakers have tipped Karen Carney as the likely winner, George’s impact has long surpassed odds and leaderboards. His journey has been fuelled not by ambition, but by something far more personal: a promise to make his mother proud.

That devotion became unmistakable in week eight, when George performed an emotional rhumba dedicated to his mum, Nicky, who is currently undergoing treatment for breast cancer. The routine — described by many as a “love letter in motion” — reduced George and his family to tears and marked the moment the wider Strictly audience truly embraced him.

Speaking candidly, George has never hidden how deeply his mother’s diagnosis has affected him. He admits her illness now dominates family life, describing her as someone who has endured far more than she ever deserved. And this isn’t the first time she’s fought her way back — when George was just 16, she survived encephalitis after suffering a seizure, an experience that left him traumatised but in awe of her resilience.

Despite his growing fame, George’s path to the final has been anything but conventional. With no professional dance background, friends say his only previous dancing took place at university socials. That lack of training has only heightened admiration for his progress — especially as fellow finalists have faced criticism for their prior stage or performance experience.

Outside the ballroom, George boasts a vast online following — 2.4 million on TikTok and close to a million across Instagram and YouTube — and Strictly insiders believe his appeal to younger audiences could mark a turning point for the long-running show. But those closest to him say his grounded nature comes from upbringing, not algorithms.

Raised in Bristol, privately educated and university-trained, George has often chosen effort over shortcuts — even with a father in a senior role at Aardman Animations. Supporting him every step of the way is his girlfriend, model Yasmin Bennett, whom George credits with believing in him “more than I ever believed in myself.”

As for what comes next, industry whispers suggest this may only be the beginning. New television opportunities are already being discussed, and many believe George is on the cusp of becoming a breakout star beyond social media.

But on this night, none of that mattered.

Because whether or not he lifts the Glitterball, George Clarke has already won something far more meaningful — the hearts of the public, and the pride of the woman whose courage inspired every step he took on the Strictly dancefloor.

Tess Daly appeared on The One Show ahead of her Strictly exit

Strictly Come Dancing star Tess Daly had to fight tears after receiving a surprise message from her husband Vernon Kay just days before her exit from the BBC dancing competition.

On Saturday night (December 20) Tess and Claudia Winkleman will mark their final time presenting the main Strictly show together after they announced their departures in October. No replacement for the duo have been revealed as the likes of Holly Willoughby, Bradley Walsh and Alison Hammond have been linked to the roles.

Announcing their exit news, Tess and Claudia said in a joint statement at the time: “We have loved working as a duo and hosting Strictly has been an absolute dream. We were always going to leave together and now feels like the right time.

“We will have the greatest rest of this amazing series and we just want to say an enormous thank you to the BBC and to every single person who works on the show. They’re the most brilliant team and we’ll miss them every day. We will cry when we say the last ‘keep dancing’ but we will continue to say it to each other. Just possibly in tracksuit bottoms at home while holding some pizza.”

Big explosion at nursing home leaves two dead as residents ‘trapped inside’

Long-overdue bike lanes will be ripped up three months after being laid – and that was ‘always the plan’

However, Tess and Claudia’s final Strictly outing will arrive on Christmas Day for the annual pre-recorded Christmas special. Taking part on it this year is Gogglebox’s Scarlett Moffatt, All Saints singer Melanie Blatt, Gladiator Jodie Ounsley, EastEnders actor Nicholas Bailey, comedian Babatunde Aléshé and Westlife’s Brian McFadden.

On Wednesday evening (December 17), Tess appeared on The One Show to speak to Alex Jones and Clara Amfo about how she feels to be leaving the programme she’s been a part of since its debut year all the way back in 2004, when she was joined by the late Bruce Forsyth

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. More info

Vernon Kay paid tribute to his wife Tess Daly on The One Show

“It was so special, I was pinching myself to even be in the same room with him, I could barely make eye contact, I was so intimidated by this legend that I grew up watching on telly. To work with him was so special because he was generous.

“He’d share his stories and teach me about live television, he’d say ‘don’t worry darling, they’ll forgive you, it’s live telly, just embrace it’. He was just so kind, wise and wonderful to work with,” she noted.

Having her say on Claudia, Tess stated: “We’re on the Christmas Day show, but we pre-recorded it. We’ll both be thinking about that moment [the final link]. It can be mayhem when you’re finding out who’s the winner…

“It’s about them, but if I catch Claudia’s eye I might go because it’s the last time. I love to bits and we had the best time. It’s just been wonderful.”

Alex then revealed that Claudia sent in a special message for Tess, in it she said: “What do I love most about working with you, everything. We laugh, you just have my back and I’m so lucky I got to work on the best Saturday night show with you. You’re my friend for life. I will be less orange, but we will still be together.”

Already feeling emotional by Claudia’s video, Alex went on to reveal that Tess’ husband Vernon had also sent in a message. Prior to playing it, Alex teased that he was ‘very hard to track down’.

“21 years as the host of Strictly Come Dancing. It’s been quite the ride. We started off with Sir Bruce Forsyth and we finished with Claudia Winkleman MBE. It’s given us so much joy and two kids, let’s not forget that.

“Congratulations on everything you’ve done on the show. You really have embedded yourself in the hearts of the nation. There have been some spectacular moments, you have been an absolute joy. It does genuinely feel like we’re losing a very, very close friend. I have no doubt that you and I will keep dancing,” Vernon said.

Becoming teary-eyed, Tess proceeded to explain how her and Vernon’s relationship has changed in the two decades she’s hosted Strictly. Their first child Phoebe was born in 2004, the year Strictly started, while Amber was welcomed into the world in 2009.

“It’s all they’ve known their whole life. It has been like another family, over a third of the year they’ve lost me to Strictly for the weekend. They haven’t minded because they’ve loved the show and they feel like they’re a part of it…

“It will be different for them too, it’s all they’ve ever known. They’re excited to come along and see it, it will be special having them there. It will be a full circle moment for me because I was pregnant in series one and here we are in the final together. If I catch Phoebe’s eye, I’m going to go. It will be quite emotional because they’ve been part of it,” she said.

By the sofa where Britain first fell in love with them, Steve Sheehan now sits with a very different weight in his heart.

For years, he and his wife Sue have been the easy laughter of Gogglebox — the couple whose warmth made millions feel like family. But behind the familiar armchairs and quick jokes, Steve has been fighting a battle no camera ever captured.

The moment Sue’s smile began to fade, everything changed.

“When Bell’s palsy arrived, it didn’t knock politely,” Steve says quietly. “It just took a part of her away overnight. The woman who never stopped smiling suddenly couldn’t recognise herself in the mirror. And there was nothing I could do to fix it.”

Except stay.

Steve doesn’t talk about heroics. He talks about mornings. About learning new routines, brushing past his own fear so Sue wouldn’t see it in his eyes. About sitting in hospital waiting rooms pretending to read leaflets he’d already memorised, just so she wouldn’t feel watched or pitied.

“There were days she’d say, ‘I don’t look like me anymore,’” he recalls. “And all I could think was, how do I make her feel beautiful when she can’t see it herself?”

So he did the only thing he knew how to do.

He made tea she didn’t ask for. He cracked the same tired jokes he’s told for decades. He held her face gently when she didn’t want to look in the mirror — not to make her change, but to remind her that the woman he married was still right there.

“I wasn’t scared of the illness,” Steve admits. “I was scared of her feeling alone in it.”

Friends say Steve became Sue’s shadow — driving her to appointments, keeping the house light when the days were heavy, pretending recovery was a series of tiny wins rather than a long road he couldn’t see the end of.

But Steve never frames it as sacrifice.

“This is marriage,” he shrugs. “It’s not the vows. It’s the Tuesday mornings when your heart is breaking and you still have to make someone laugh.”

Now, as Sue takes each day as it comes, Steve remains on the same sofa, same seat, same promise.

“I don’t need her to be better tomorrow,” he says softly. “I just need her to know she’s not walking through this by herself. If I can be the one thing that doesn’t change for her, then I’ve done my job.”

In a world obsessed with grand gestures, Steve Sheehan’s love is quieter than most.

But it’s also unbreakable.

Lorraine Kelly’s Husband Subtly Confirms Separation After Uncovering a Hidden Secret

Lorraine Kelly, the beloved television presenter, has recently been at the center of a personal storm as her husband has subtly confirmed that the couple has separated. This revelation comes shortly after he discovered a secret that Lorraine had been keeping from him, which reportedly changed his perception of the woman he thought he knew. Fans and followers of the TV star have been left shocked by the news, eager to understand the circumstances surrounding this unexpected development.

The Subtle Confirmation of Separation

While neither Lorraine Kelly nor her husband has made a formal public statement, subtle hints and carefully worded comments have led to widespread speculation about the status of their marriage. Lorraine’s husband, in particular, has been noticeably reserved in recent interviews and social media posts, indirectly acknowledging the couple’s separation. His remarks suggest a sense of betrayal and disappointment, indicating that the secret he uncovered had a profound impact on their relationship.

This subtle confirmation has sparked a wave of interest among fans and media outlets alike. Lorraine Kelly, known for her warm and approachable personality, has always maintained a private personal life, making this revelation all the more surprising. The nature of the secret remains undisclosed, but the emotional weight it carries is evident in her husband’s statements.

What Could the Secret Be?

Speculation about the secret Lorraine Kelly was hiding has been rampant since the news broke. While no concrete details have been revealed, insiders suggest that it could relate to personal or family matters that Lorraine chose to keep private. Given her public image and the trust she has built with her audience, this hidden aspect of her life has understandably caused a stir.

Experts on  celebrity relationships note that secrets, especially those uncovered unexpectedly, can significantly strain even the strongest marriages. The feeling of discovering something unknown about a partner often leads to a reassessment of the relationship’s foundation. Lorraine Kelly’s husband’s comment, “That’s not the woman I thought I knew,” encapsulates this sense of disillusionment.

The Impact on Lorraine Kelly’s Career and Public Image

Despite the personal challenges, Lorraine Kelly continues to maintain her professional commitments with grace and resilience. Her ability to separate her private life from her public persona has been commendable, allowing her to remain a trusted figure in the media industry. However, the revelation of her separation and the secret she kept may influence public perception moving forward.

In the world of celebrity, personal matters often intertwine with professional reputations. Lorraine’s fans have expressed support and empathy, hoping she finds peace and clarity during this difficult time. The situation also highlights the pressures public figures face in balancing transparency with privacy.

Looking Ahead: What This Means for Lorraine Kelly and Her Husband

As Lorraine Kelly and her husband navigate this new chapter, the focus remains on healing and understanding. Separation, while challenging, can also be an opportunity for growth and reflection. Both parties are likely to prioritize their well-being and personal happiness as they move forward separately.

For fans and followers, it is important to respect their privacy and allow them the space to manage their personal affairs without undue speculation. Lorraine Kelly’s strength and professionalism suggest that she will continue to thrive, both personally and professionally, despite this setback.

Support and Privacy: The Balance Fans Should Maintain

In times like these, public figures benefit greatly from the support of their audience. Offering empathy rather than judgment can make a significant difference. Lorraine Kelly’s journey reminds us that behind the glamour and fame, celebrities face real-life challenges just like anyone else.

Respecting boundaries and avoiding intrusive speculation helps maintain a healthy environment for both Lorraine and her family. Fans can continue to celebrate her achievements and contributions to the media while honoring her need for privacy.

Conclusion

Lorraine Kelly’s husband’s subtle confirmation of their separation following the discovery of a secret she had been hiding marks a poignant moment in the couple’s lives. While the details remain private, the impact on their relationship is clear. As Lorraine Kelly moves forward, her resilience and professionalism will undoubtedly guide her through this difficult period. Fans are encouraged to support her with kindness and respect for her privacy. Stay tuned for further updates on Lorraine Kelly’s personal and professional journey. If you want to stay informed about the latest celebrity news and personal stories, subscribe to our newsletter today!

Introduction:

In the world of live television, unexpected moments are inevitable. But few incidents have ever unfolded with the raw intensity of the now-infamous confrontation between Sir Cliff Richard and Loose Women host Denise Welch—a moment that turned a routine promotional interview into a televised flashpoint that viewers would replay and analyze for days.

When Cliff Richard stepped onto the set that morning, he carried with him the grace and experience earned over six decades in the spotlight. The audience welcomed him warmly. The atmosphere felt familiar—bright lights, friendly faces, the usual blend of casual chatter and anticipation. For Cliff, this was simply another stop on a press tour he had navigated effortlessly for years.

Yet from the moment he took his seat, something felt off. Denise Welch greeted him with a smile that never fully softened, and an unmistakable tension hung in the air. Still, Cliff remained poised, ready to discuss his new album, his upcoming tour, and the music that continued to inspire audiences around the world.

The conversation began smoothly. Cliff spoke passionately about his creative process, the stories behind the songs, the joy he still found in performing. But the tone shifted abruptly when Denise interrupted him mid-sentence with a question that stunned both the studio and the viewers at home: “Who exactly is still listening to this kind of music? Surely your audience has long moved on.”

A hush fell over the room. Cliff—the consummate professional—responded with calm dignity, explaining that his concerts still sold out, his fans remained loyal, and music, no matter the decade, has lasting value. But Denise pressed on, her questions turning colder, her tone edging from provocative into personal. She suggested his moment had passed, dismissed his career longevity, and implied he clung to a bygone era.

With each exchange, the tension grew sharper. Panelists shifted uncomfortably. The audience recoiled. Yet Cliff remained composed, meeting disrespect with steadiness. Only when it became clear that the conversation had veered into hostility did he reach his limit.

Removing his microphone with quiet resolve, he stood. “A conversation requires mutual respect,” he said, his voice unwavering. “And you’ve made it clear you have none for me.” Moments later, he walked off the set—leaving behind a stunned audience, scrambling producers, and a host forced to confront the consequences of her own words.

The fallout was immediate. Clips flooded social media. Thousands weighed in. Many praised Cliff for his grace under pressure, applauding his refusal to tolerate disrespect masquerading as honesty. Others questioned the growing trend of aggressive interviewing—when “being real” crosses the line into cruelty.

In the end, Cliff Richard didn’t raise his voice. He didn’t retaliate. He simply walked away—a reminder that dignity is sometimes the strongest response of all. And in doing so, he turned a 34-second insult into a powerful lesson in respect, professionalism, and the enduring strength of character.

Strictly Come Dancing’s La Voix has broke her silence on cynical fans’ conspiracy theory that she faked her injury to get out of performing this week on spin-off show It Takes Two.

On Tuesday, it was revealed that the Drag Race star, 45, real name Christopher Dennis, was forced to drop out of the upcoming Blackpool special this weekend after suffering an injury.

While chatting with Janette Manrara, 42, alongside his dance partner Aljaž Škorjanec, 35, on the popular spin-off on Thursday, La Voix said: ‘This has been ongoing since the foxtrot.

‘I felt a little niggle in my foot, hence comments about me being flat-footed. I was thinking this will be fine, but it got gradually worse.

‘Until, on Saturday, we had to change shoes. I couldn’t wear heels. I had to wear those awful flat shoes.

‘We tried on Monday and it was really clear I was struggling, in pain, so we decided to be professional and call this, hoping with some rest I can be back.’

Strictly Come Dancing’s La Voix has broke her silence on the conspiracy theory about why she REALLY dropped out of show and also shared an injury update on It Takes Two earlier this week

While chatting with Janette Manrara, 42, alongside his dance partner Aljaž Škorjanec, 35, on the popular spin-off earlier this week, La Voix opened up about the injury

A day later La Voix took to Instagram to share an update with fans.

She said: ‘Good morning my darlings.

‘As I’m looking on social media and everyone is on their way to Blackpool, I am off for an MRI scan to see what is actually going on with my foot.

‘I have a bone bruise, which is basically from the repetition of being in the heels and it’s on where my toe joins my foot.

‘It’s like a deep bone bruise, which basically if I keep working on could become a stress fracture.

‘Which obviously means a broken foot which is six to eight weeks off my foot in a boot.

‘Which would be awful, so luckily they’ve caught it up before it has got to that stage.

‘And as I said on It Takes Two to the physio team, the whole of the BBC Strictly team have been amazing.

La Voix said: ‘This has been ongoing since the foxtrot. ‘I felt a little niggle in my foot, hence comments about me being flat-footed. I was thinking this will be fine, but it got gradually worse’

‘I’ve had MRIs, I’ve had X-rays, I’ve had physio, and that’s all carrying on today.

‘So I’ve got my very attractive boot on and I’m basically just icing and keeping my foot elevated and resting as much as I can.’

Luckily La Voix and dance partner Aljaž will be able to continue in the competition due to the show rules.

It’s this loophole in the competition that some fans accused La Voix of taking advantage of, with one complaining: ‘Well that’s one way to avoid the dance off… doesn’t seem fair to me.’

Another echoed: ‘Probs being harsh but seems like they reward you for getting injured if you automatically sail through.’

While a third jeered: ‘And just when you were favourite to go next… hmmmm.’

On Tuesday it was reported that she was ‘devastated and heartbroken’ after being advised by doctors to rest and focus on recovery.

Speaking in a statement, the Drag Race star said: ‘It is with immense sadness that I have to withdraw from this weekend’s Strictly Come Dancing shows in Blackpool.

‘Due to an injury, I’ve been advised that I’m unable to perform, and my heart truly breaks knowing I won’t be dancing in such an iconic venue.

‘Aljaž and I have worked incredibly hard, and we were so excited to share our routine with everyone.

‘I am devastated not to be joining the rest of the cast on that famous dancefloor, but my focus now is on recovery. I’ll be cheering on all the amazing couples this weekend.’

Luckily La Voix and dance partner Aljaž will be able to continue in the competition due to the show rules

‘In line with the rules of Strictly Come Dancing, La Voix and Aljaž will receive a bye through to next week when it is hoped they will be able to dance again.

‘We wish La Voix the very best for a speedy recovery.’

Strictly Come Dancing will continue this weekend from Blackpool’s Tower Ballroom with six competing couples.

La Voix and their professional partner Aljaž Škorjanec closed last week’s show with their Couple’s Choice.

They performed to ‘Don’t Rain On My Parade’ by Barbra Streisand.

Once again the judges ‘loved it’, praising the performer’s stage presence before marking a respectable 33 out of 40.

Ahead of the performance La Voix left viewers emotional as she tearfully opened up about her beloved mother’s recent death.

The TV personality said her ‘world had gone’ in a moment following the ‘unexpected’ passing.

Ahead of her performance with pro partner Aljaž the entertainer paid a visit to ‘immensely supportive’ father Richard, who previously appeared with her on RuPaul‘s Drag Race UK, as they reflected on the recent loss.

Choking back tears, she said: ‘My mum was the same as my dad, equally supportive, she was there at every single show. I lost her in April this year so its only what 7/8 months.

‘I did a massive West End show in London and she wasn’t well and I remember I’d gone from 1500 people clapping and cheering to the next day, just your world’s gone.’

Elsewhere, Strictly Come Dancing fans were left concerned after Vicky Pattison and pro partner Kai Widdrington were absent from It Takes Two on Monday.

The reality star, 38, became the seventh celebrity booted from the show on Sunday and missed a place in this week’s Blackpool special after losing the dreaded dance-off against EastEnders‘ Balvinder Sopal, 46, and Julian Caillon, 30.

Strictly’s latest evictee always appear on spin-off It Takes Two every Monday to discuss their exit and time in the competition, but this week host Fleur East revealed Vicky and Kai were not there.

She said: ‘This weekend we sadly said goodbye to Vicky and Kai. They can’t be with us tonight but will be joining us later on in the week.’

Following Fleur’s announcement fans rushed to X asking: ”No Vicky & Kai on It Takes Two tonight, hope thinks are ok’: ‘Where are Vicky and Kai?’: ‘Unusual to not have the departed couple on It Takes Two of a Monday, legit can’t remember this occurring before’: Wonder why the last minute change and no Vicky.’

Vicky went on to appear on the show on Wednesday 19 November.

Meanwhile, Strictly Come Dancing is set to make history with a brand new format from the end of November that will challenge the remaining couples.

Instant Dance will see each couple pick a dance style at random from ones they have learnt in the competition so far.

They will then be played their accompanying music and – after a frantic dash through wardrobe to select and change into their costumes – each couple will have just 10 seconds on the countdown clock to decide exactly how they’re going to dance it.

Once all six Strictly couples have danced, the judges will rank them and award their extra marks accordingly.

Then, a maximum of six marks will be awarded to the couple whose Instant Dance performance impressed them the most, right down to one point for the couple whose dance impressed them the least.

Head judge Shirley Ballas said: ‘Instant Dance has the power to change everything for our couples, and will challenge them in ways they have never been challenged before.

‘With standards so incredibly high this year and the competition so close, there’s a lot resting on it.

‘The dance styles, costumes and music might not be revealed until the night, but what we can be sure of right now is that it’s going to be a whole lot of fun. I cannot wait!’

The exciting new format will take place towards the end of the month – Saturday 29 to be exact – once all six remaining couples have danced in the usual way.

Strictly Come Dancing airs Saturdays and Sundays on BBC One and is available to stream on iPlayer.