“She arrived… and everything changed.” Stacey Solomon has officially welcomed her beautiful baby girl, calling her arrival “the blessing we never expected but always dreamed of.” Wrapped in love, tears and quiet disbelief, Stacey held her daughter close — and hearts across the UK melted instantly. FANS REACT

TEARS OF JOY as Stacey Solomon Introduces Her Baby Girl — “Our Hearts Are Complete”

So sweet! Stacey Solomon has once again melted hearts after revealing her toddler’s major milestone — leaving fans emotional and full of praise.

The TV favourite, 34, is a proud mum to five children: Rex, 5, Rose, 3, and Belle, 2, whom she shares with husband Joe Swash, as well as Zachary, 17, and Leighton, 12, from a previous relationship.

Currently, Stacey is enjoying a sunshine-filled family getaway and has been keeping her loyal followers updated every step of the way.

On Thursday, Stacey shared the sweetest video on Instagram showing daughter Rose jumping into the pool and straight into her arms. Another heartwarming clip revealed Stacey teaching her little girl how to swim

Beaming with pride, Stacey continued:

Fans were quick to flood the comments with love and admiration. One gushed: “Clever girl well done for teaching her.” Another wrote: “Wow that’s brilliant news Rose.” A third confessed: “Literally crying at this, so beautiful.”

Others praised Stacey too, with one fan saying: “You’re such an amazing mother, well done Rosie.”

Stacey’s Holiday Glow

Away from the pool, Stacey has been giving her followers glimpses of her luxury five-star family holiday.

The mum-of-five wowed fans with her swimwear snaps, first in a bold yellow bikini as she sped down a water slide, and later in a chic black two-piece while reflecting on her health journey.

Sharing a serene photo from an underwater cave, Stacey admitted:

She added that her fitness focus is not just about aesthetics, but about feeling strong and healthy for her family.

A Hint at Baby Number Six?

And while her family holiday is filled with magical memories, Stacey also dropped hints that she’s preparing herself — both physically and mentally — to welcome baby number six in the future.

For Stacey, every new addition has been a blessing, and as she has openly said before, “Every time feels special.” Fans are already buzzing with excitement, wondering if the Solomon-Swash clan will soon be expanding once again.

First look at Linda Robson and Lesley Joseph as they reunite on The Good Ship Murder

It’s great to have them back!

The Good Ship Murd3r drops anchor in Cape Verde this month and it’s bringing along two very familiar faces – Linda Robson and Lesley Joseph are on board as guest stars!

The Birds of a Feather favourites appear together in an upcoming episode of the Channel 5 cosy crime drama. It marks their first acting collaboration since 2020. That year saw the much-loved sitcom return for a special episode, bringing the gang back together one last time.

Neither actress pops up in TV dramas all that often these days so this is a rare treat for their fans. Linda is best known to many as a regular Loose Women panellist. Meanwhile, Lesley has joined as a guest panellist!

So what can viewers expect? Here’s a first look at Linda Robson and Lesley Joseph’s characters in The Good Ship Murd3r – and everything we know so far about the episode.

Lesley Joseph and Linda Robson reunite in The Good Ship Murd3r (Credit: Channel 5)

The Good Ship Murd3r welcomes Lesley Joseph and Linda Robson to the guest cast

Lesley Joseph and Linda Robson join the guest cast of The Good Ship Murd3r series 3 in episode 5. Their appearance follows recent guest turns from Emmerdale’s Lesley Dunlop and River City’s Sally Howitt.

The veteran actresses play “two merry widows Tilly and Elsa”, who embark on a grief cruise to celebrate the lives of their late partners. When the ship docks in Cape Verde, they join a small group heading ashore to visit a local shrine and pay their respects.

But the trip takes a dark turn when Tilly (Lesley Joseph) is found Murd3red. As Jack begins to piece together what happened, a number of suspects emerge. These include creepy fellow grief cruiser Noel, who appears to have been stalking Tilly. There’s also shifty restaurant critic Angel, who is hiding something, and Emiliano, a market trader with questionable contacts and a police record.

Kriss Dosanjh also guest stars as Noel. Viewers may recognise him from roles including Ashok Masum in Casualty. He’s also known for playing The Brigadier in The Larkins, and Hassan Habeeb on Coronation Street.
The veteran actresses as ‘two merry widows Tilly and Elsa’ (Credit: Channel 5)

What are Linda Robson and Lesley Joseph famous for?

For many viewers, Lesley Joseph and Linda Robson will forever be Dorien Green and Tracey Stubbs from Birds of a Feather. They played the roles from 1989 right through to 2020, alongside co-star and close friend Pauline Quirke, who portrayed Sharon Theodopolopodous.

In 2021, Pauline was diagnosed with dementia. Linda and Pauline are childhood best friends in real life. Earlier this year, Linda revealed that her friend no longer recognised her or her children.

Speaking on Loose Women, she said: “It’s very sad. We’ve been best friends since we were 10. I’ve known [about the diagnosis] for three years and we’ve managed to keep it quiet. She doesn’t know who anybody is. She doesn’t know who I am or who are kids are.”

Lesley Joseph as ill-fated widow Tilly (Credit: C5)

Was Birds of a Feather axed?

Birds of a Feather was a huge hit in its original BBC One run from 1989 to 1998. ITV revived the sitcom in 2014, where it continued for six more years, with the final episode airing on Christmas Eve 2020.

Pauline’s character Sharon Theodopolopodous was notably absent from that final Christmas special, which aired a year before her diagnosis.

The series centred on chalk-and-cheese sisters Sharon and Tracey, whose husbands were jailed for armed robbery. Sharon moved from her Edmonton council flat into Tracey’s comfortable Chigwell home in Essex, where they soon had to deal with their nosy – and eventually beloved – neighbour Dorien.

Of course, Dorien became notorious as the middle-aged married Jewish woman with a weakness for younger men.

Heartbroken:Lisa Riley admits ‘it still wasn’t enough’ as she opens up about co-star Robin Windsor’s heartbreaking d3ath

Lisa said she was his ‘comfort blanket’

Actress Lisa Riley opened up about her Strictly co-star Robin Windsor’s heartbreaking death in a new interview.

In 2012, Lisa and Riley formed a close bond as dance partners on Strictly. The pair finished in fifth place.

Tragically, Robin died at age 44 in February 2024. A cause of death was not revealed. However, tributes flooded in from many of his co-stars, including Lisa.

“My Bestie, My Robin, My Angel…….now our forever Angel, who is loved, will always be loved, forever in my heart……my very broken heart, I love you, shine your beautiful, electric energy from heaven. SHINE IN PEACE,” she wrote.

During Strictly, Lisa and Robin finished in fifth place (Credit: Splashnews.com)

Lisa Riley opens up about Robin Windsor’s death

In a new interview, Lisa sat down with mental health charity SANE to discuss the importance of reaching out to someone if you’re struggling.

“Let people know that no matter how much you’re struggling, talking really helps,” she explained.

“Whether it is the helpline for SANE or whether it is your family member, your best friend.”

However, Lisa explained that she and her Strictly co-star Robin “would talk for hours”, stating that she was his “comfort blanket” and “shoulder to cry on”.

“And yet, it still wasn’t enough,” she continued, adding that she feels it is her “duty” to continue to raise awareness with charities.

‘Absolutely love you’

Following the interview, Lisa was supported by her followers.

“Couldn’t love you more,” one user wrote.

“Absolutely love you,” another person shared.

“Amazing interview!” a third remarked.

‘He always wanted to do the show’

Meanwhile, last year, Lisa signed up for I’m A Celebrity and revealed that Robin was “one of the main reasons” she wanted to do it.

“He always wanted to do the show, and he thought I was crazy to have said no after all these years,” she told

“And Robin would be like ‘You’d be [bleep]ing hilarious. I can hear him now shouting at me, going, you would be [bleep]ing hilarious.”

A quiet new-year miracle for Peter Andre… and fans can’t stop sending love. Without any big fanfare, Peter Andre has begun the year with the happiest family news, opening his heart about life with wife Emily and their baby girl — the daughter he says has “completed us.” From sharing her sweet nickname to revealing how their blended family is growing closer than ever, his words are melting hearts everywhere. Read Peter’s emotional family update below

In the quiet glow of the new year, British entertainer **Peter Andre** has shared some of the most heartfelt family moments yet, marking 2026 with a profound sense of joy and completion. Without grand announcements or flashy events, the 52-year-old singer and TV personality opened up about life with his wife, NHS doctor **Emily MacDonagh**, and their youngest child—the baby girl who has truly “completed” their blended family.

Peter and Emily welcomed their third child together, a daughter named **Arabella Rose Andréa** (affectionately known as **Belle** or **Little Belle**), back in April 2024. Now approaching her second birthday in the spring of 2026, Arabella has become the heart of their home, bringing a fresh wave of love and unity to a family that already includes Peter’s children from his previous marriage to Katie Price—**Junior Andre** (now 20) and **Princess Andre** (18)—as well as the couple’s older children, **Amelia** (Millie, 11-12) and **Theo** (9).

In recent social media posts and interviews around the New Year period (January 2026), Peter described Arabella as the missing piece that has deepened their bonds. “She has completed us,” he shared in one emotional reflection, emphasizing how her arrival has strengthened the entire family dynamic. The couple, married since 2015, have long been open about the joys and challenges of blending two worlds—Peter’s high-profile past and Emily’s grounded medical career—into a loving, cohesive unit.

Fans have been particularly touched by Peter’s tender updates on Arabella’s sweet nickname, “Little Belle.” Emily first revealed it in a charming 2024 video of the baby watching her siblings play, and it has stuck ever since. Peter has called it “perfect,” often posting glimpses of family life where Belle’s presence lights up every scene. In one recent share, he highlighted how all five children dote on her—Junior and Princess showering her with big-sibling affection, while Millie and Theo include her in their daily adventures. “The siblings are all in love with their little sister,” Peter has repeatedly noted, underscoring the seamless integration that has made their household feel whole.

This New Year miracle feels especially poignant against the backdrop of Peter’s family reflections. As 2026 began, Emily posted rare, loved-up photos from their 2025 adventures—including a romantic Eiffel Tower kiss—while setting personal goals for the year ahead. Peter, in turn, has spoken about cherishing these quieter moments amid his busy schedule of music, TV appearances, and family duties. He has confirmed that Arabella is their “last” child, a decision made thoughtfully at his age. “I’ve never had a limit before… but at 51, the lack of sleep feels a little different,” he told *Bella* magazine in early 2025, adding that the experience with Belle has been “amazing” but signals the end of expanding their brood.

The blended family aspect remains a source of pride. Peter often corrects assumptions about having “five” children, playfully noting it’s “technically six” when including the supportive role he played in Katie Price’s eldest son Harvey’s life during their relationship. Yet with Emily, the focus is on harmony: shared parenting rules (like strict screen time limits for the younger ones), family holidays, and everyday joys like farm visits or simple home videos.

Fans have flooded Peter’s and Emily’s Instagram posts with love, calling the updates “heart-melting” and “the purest joy.” Comments like “Your family is beautiful—Belle completes the picture!” and “Wishing you all the happiest new year” pour in, reflecting widespread admiration for how Peter and Emily have navigated fame, co-parenting, and building a nurturing environment. One supporter wrote, “Seeing how loved Little Belle is by everyone melts my heart. True family goals.”

Peter’s words carry extra warmth this January. Amid occasional family challenges—such as ongoing public dynamics with ex Katie Price or concerns for his mother’s health (Thea, who battles Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s)—these glimpses of domestic bliss serve as a reminder of gratitude. He has described Emily as an “incredible mum” and the birth of Arabella as a “beautiful gift,” sentiments that resonate deeply as the family enters 2026 stronger than ever.

From the initial overwhelm of her arrival (“We feel so overwhelmed right now… Mum and daughter are doing amazing,” Peter posted in April 2024) to now watching her grow into a confident, adored toddler, Arabella’s journey has mirrored the family’s growth. Peter credits her for bringing everyone closer—bridging generations, fostering sibling bonds, and reminding them of life’s simple miracles.

As Peter continues his career—teasing potential music projects and TV work—it’s these private, unassuming moments that fans cherish most. No big fanfare was needed; just honest reflections from a man who says his heart has never felt fuller. In a world of constant noise, Peter Andre’s quiet celebration of family love stands out as the perfect way to start the year.

With Arabella “completing” them, the Andres embody resilience, love, and the beauty of blended beginnings. Fans can’t stop sending love—and it’s easy to see why.

“They Can’t Just Do This!” New footage has emerged showing masked British men targeting migrant boats on French beaches, sparking outrage and fear across both sides of the Channel. Witnesses described the scenes as “terrifying” and “chaotic,” with locals and officials alike warning this could mark a chilling new chapter in the crisis. Is this the result of public desperation after years of political inaction — or the beginning of something far more dangerous?

In the windswept dunes of northern France, where the English Channel’s waves crash like a relentless tide of human desperation, a new front has opened in the battle over illegal migration. Shocking footage circulating online shows masked British men, cloaked in hoods and anonymity, storming beaches near Calais and Dunkirk. Armed with knives, they slash inflatable dinghies destined for the UK, their blades slicing through rubber as they bellow war cries like “Not one more!” and “Don’t touch another person!” These self-proclaimed patriots, operating under banners like “Operation Stop The Boats,” have turned the migrant route into a theater of vigilante justice, raising alarms about escalating violence on Europe’s shores.

The clips, amassing thousands of views on platforms like X and Instagram, depict the men—often waving Union Jacks—digging up buried boats from the sand, stomping engines, and puncturing hulls under cover of night. One viral video captures a hooded figure plunging a knife into a deflated vessel, the hiss of escaping air underscoring his declaration: “We’re taking matters into our own hands because no one else will.” These aren’t isolated acts; groups like Raise The Colours, with over 100,000 followers, have documented dozens of such raids, framing them as a grassroots response to what they call a “migrant invasion.” Their online pleas for donations urge supporters: “Stopping the boats, whether the migrants or government like it or not!”

This surge in far-right activism comes amid record Channel crossings. In 2025 alone, over 50,000 migrants have braved the deadly 21-mile stretch, a 50% spike from last year, driven by smuggling gangs profiting millions. French authorities, bolstered by £500 million in UK funding, have intensified patrols—deploying drones, buggies, and even slashing boats themselves in shallow waters. But critics argue these measures fall short, with migrants regrouping in squalid camps, undeterred by the peril. Last July, BBC footage showed gendarmes wading in to knife a dinghy packed with families, dragging the wreckage ashore amid cries of frustration. “It’s like a war zone,” one migrant told reporters, echoing Nigel Farage’s warnings of “hammer attacks and stabbings” by rival gangs.

Yet, the vigilantes’ interventions teeter on the edge of criminality. French prosecutors in Dunkirk have launched probes into “aggravated violence” against migrants, citing September incidents where four flag-waving Brits allegedly assaulted asylum seekers, stealing belongings and hurling insults: “You’re not welcome in England!” Human rights groups like Utopia 56 decry the acts as xenophobic thuggery, warning they exacerbate dangers—deflated boats mean more desperate launches, and 73 deaths last year underscore the route’s lethality. One Kurdish migrant, Deniz, recounted four failed crossings: “We begged the officer to look away, but he slashed it anyway. Now it’s these masked men doing the same.”

Back in Britain, the raids split opinions. Supporters hail them as bold patriotism, filling a void left by “ineffective” governments—Labour’s border policies under fire for hotel housing and benefit strains. Detractors, including anti-fascist watchdogs, fear they embolden extremists, potentially sparking clashes with armed smugglers who, in one clip, stabbed at a vigilante’s car tire while police stood by. As winter storms brew, the question looms: Will these knife-wielding crusaders deter crossings, or ignite a transnational powder keg? With Franco-British summits looming, the beaches remain a flashpoint—where desperation meets defiance, and one punctured dream can sink lives on both sides.

A Shock Intervention That Split the Nation

Britain woke up to political whiplash this morning after Joanna Lumley delivered a blistering, unscripted intervention that tore straight through Westminster’s carefully managed calm.

In a moment that instantly went viral, Lumley accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government of economic mismanagement, empty rhetoric, and governing the country like a “glossy stage show instead of a nation in crisis.”

Household bills are climbing. Insurance premiums are surging. Trains are delayed or cancelled. Public patience, many feel, is gone.

And Lumley—long admired as a cultural icon and humanitarian—did not whisper her concerns. She detonated them.

“This isn’t leadership,” Lumley said, her voice calm but cutting. “It’s performance. Perfect lighting, polished speeches—and zero accountability.”

“Ballroom Politics” and a Country Under Pressure

Lumley’s most stinging line came when she accused Westminster of indulging what she called “ballroom politics.”

“You glide across the floor while families are counting coins at the kitchen table,” she said.

“You rehearse applause lines while commuters sleep on station floors.”

The comment ricocheted across social media within minutes. Supporters hailed her as a truth-teller. Critics accused her of overreach.

But few denied the emotional resonance of her words.

In a brief but tense exchange captured on camera, a government representative attempted to push back.

“With respect,” the spokesperson said, “governing a modern economy requires balance and patience.”

Lumley didn’t hesitate.

“Patience?” she replied. “Tell that to the nurse choosing between heating and eating.

Tell that to the bus driver blamed for delays caused by policy chaos.”

The room fell silent.

Froпtliпe Workers Caυght iп the Crossfire

Perhaps the most powerful section of Lumley’s intervention focused on frontline workers—nurses, transport staff, emergency responders—who, she argued, have become political shields.

“When governments run out of answers, they look for scapegoats,” Lumley said.
“And it is always the people who show up every day who are thrown under the bus.”

A union leader later echoed her sentiment in a televised panel discussion.

“She said what our members feel,” he noted. “We are exhausted, underpaid, and blamed for failures we didn’t create.”

Government officials, meanwhile, insisted reforms are underway. But the damage was already done.

The framing had shifted—from policy debate to moral indictment.

Inside the Starmer Response

Downing Street moved quickly to contain the fallout.

In a statement released hours later, Starmer acknowledged “public frustration” but

rejected Lumley’s characterisation.

“We are taking responsible steps to stabilise the economy and protect working families,” the statement read.

Yet insiders described visible irritation behind the scenes. One senior aide, speaking anonymously, said, “This wasn’t a routine criticism.

This cut through in a way polling never does.”

In a heated off-camera exchange reported by journalists, a senior Labour figure reportedly snapped:

“She’s an actress, not an economist.”

The reply from a rival MP came instantly:

“And yet half the country is listening to her instead of us.”

Social Media Erupts

Online, the reaction was explosive.

“She spoke for us,” one viral post read.
“Stick to acting,” another countered.
A third summed up the moment more starkly: “When celebrities sound more grounded than politicians, something is broken.”

Hashtags trended. Clips racked up millions of views. The debate spilled from phones to pubs, offices, and dinner tables.

This wasn’t just a viral moment. It became a cultural flashpoint.

Hashtags trended. Clips racked up millions of views. The debate spilled from phones to pubs, offices, and dinner tables.

This wasn’t just a viral moment. It became a cultural flashpoint.

More Than Noise—A Signal

Political analysts agree on one thing: Lumley’s intervention struck a nerve because it tapped into something deeper than party politics.

“This wasn’t about left versus right,” said one commentator. “It was about authenticity versus performance.”

Whether Lumley intended to become a political lightning rod is almost irrelevant now. The match has been lit.

Britain is restless. Trust is thin. And the line between celebrity and conscience has never looked more blurred.

As one viewer posted late last night:

“She didn’t run for office. She didn’t ask for votes. She just said what millions are thinking.”

And in today’s Britain, that may be the most dangerous—and powerful—thing of all.

There was something hauntingly gentle about the timing. A motorway. Snow falling. A lyric about going home. After everything he survived cancer, lost organs, years of physical struggle his final message didn’t speak of fear or regret. It spoke of home. Sometimes legends don’t leave with noise. They leave the way they lived quietly, honestly, and with dignity.

“I’m Not Frightened” — How Chris Rea Faced Death Without Fear as His Final Christmas Message Leaves Fans in Tears

For millions, Christmas officially begins when Driving Home for Christmas drifts through the car radio. This year, that familiar melody now carries a heartbreaking weight.

Just hours before his death, Chris Rea quietly shared what would become his final message to the world — a simple image of a car crawling through snow, a motorway sign reading:

“Driving home for Christmas with a thousand memories.”

His caption was gentle, almost playful:

“Top to toe in tailbacks. If it’s a white Christmas, let’s hope the journey’s a smooth one.”

By Monday morning, the voice behind one of Britain’s most beloved festive songs was gone. He was 74.

A life shaped by battles no one saw

Chris Rea had stared down death long before the world knew he was ill.

At just 33 years old, he was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer — a sentence few survive. Surgeons removed part of his pancreas, his gall bladder and a section of his liver. He lived the rest of his life managing diabetes, kidney disease and a rare condition that caused his own tissues to attack each other.

“I’ve had nine major operations in ten years,” he once said.
“It attacked the colon, pancreas, gall bladder, liver… and then I had a stroke.”

In 2016, he collapsed on stage during a performance. Many assumed it was the end.

Instead, he went back to the studio.

“I wasn’t afraid of dying”

Behind closed doors, Chris made peace with the idea of death far earlier than most.

In one interview, he revealed the moment a nurse told him bluntly to phone his wife, Joan, because the cancer was serious. Joan pulled over on the side of the road and broke down in tears.

Chris didn’t.

He handed over the rights to his most famous song to his wife and joked later:
“I gave her everything — and now she won’t give it back.”

What truly kept him going, he said, was not fame, charts or money — but his daughters.

“I wanted to leave something my girls could say,
‘That’s what Papa did. The blues. That was him.’”

The final drive home

On Sunday night, his last image appeared online — a snowy road, a lonely motorway sign, a caption full of calm. No drama. No goodbye.

Just a man preparing, in his own quiet way, for one last journey home.

His family confirmed he passed away peacefully in hospital, surrounded by love.

And now, as Christmas approaches, millions will hear his song again — unaware, perhaps, that the man who wrote it faced death not with fear, but with grace, humour and defiance.

This year, Driving Home for Christmas isn’t just a song.

It’s a farewell.

BREAKING NEWS: Rod Stewart took a stand last night that no one saw coming but no one will ever forget

In a stunning display of leadership and composure, Rod Stewart, the legendary British rock icon, made an unexpected and unforgettable stand during his recent performance in London. Midway through his set, as anti-British chants began to rise from a small section near the front of the stage, Stewart could have easily succumbed to the tension. However, in a move that left fans and critics alike in awe, he raised his microphone and began singing “God Save the King/Queen” softly into the night.

At first, it was just Stewart’s voice, cutting through the air with a calm yet unwavering tone. As the crowd observed the quiet defiance, the moment quickly became one of those rare instances where an artist transcends the typical expectations of performance. With each note, the tension in the arena began to dissolve, replaced by a sense of unity and shared history. Within seconds, the voices of 25,000 concertgoers swelled in unison, harmonizing with Stewart’s powerful rendition of the iconic British anthem.

The song, which has long been a symbol of national pride and unity, became the catalyst for an extraordinary shift in energy. Flags waved, and tears fell as the crowd, once divided by the chants of a few, came together in an emotional outpouring of solidarity. It was a collective moment that reminded everyone present of the power of music to heal and unite. Stewart’s decision to lead with grace rather than engage with hostility was a powerful message not just for his fans, but for all those watching around the world.
As the song echoed across the venue, the anti-British chants that had once dominated the space were replaced by a collective chorus of pride and resilience. The audience, who moments ago had been caught in the throes of division, stood shoulder to shoulder in a harmonious display of national pride. Stewart’s leadership had reclaimed the atmosphere, turning what could have been a divisive moment into one of unity and mutual respect. The result was nothing short of magical-a powerful testament to the enduring influence of music in the face of adversity.

In a stunning display of leadership and composure, Rod Stewart, the legendary British rock icon, made an unexpected and unforgettable stand during his recent performance in London. Midway through his set, as anti-British chants began to rise from a small section near the front of the stage, Stewart could have easily succumbed to the tension. However, in a move that left fans and critics alike in awe, he raised his microphone and began singing “God Save the King/Queen” softly into the night.

At first, it was just Stewart’s voice, cutting through the air with a calm yet unwavering tone. As the crowd observed the quiet defiance, the moment quickly became one of those rare instances where an artist transcends the typical expectations of performance. With each note, the tension in the arena began to dissolve, replaced by a sense of unity and shared history. Within seconds, the voices of 25,000 concertgoers swelled in unison, harmonizing with Stewart’s powerful rendition of the iconic British anthem.

The song, which has long been a symbol of national pride and unity, became the catalyst for an extraordinary shift in energy. Flags waved, and tears fell as the crowd, once divided by the chants of a few, came together in an emotional outpouring of solidarity. It was a collective moment that reminded everyone present of the power of music to heal and unite. Stewart’s decision to lead with grace rather than engage with hostility was a powerful message not just for his fans, but for all those watching around the world.
As the song echoed across the venue, the anti-British chants that had once dominated the space were replaced by a collective chorus of pride and resilience. The audience, who moments ago had been caught in the throes of division, stood shoulder to shoulder in a harmonious display of national pride. Stewart’s leadership had reclaimed the atmosphere, turning what could have been a divisive moment into one of unity and mutual respect. The result was nothing short of magical-a powerful testament to the enduring influence of music in the face of adversity.

For those who were lucky enough to witness the moment firsthand, it was clear that Rod Stewart had reaffirmed his place not just as a rock legend, but as a beacon of resilience and leadership. In a time when divisions often seem impossible to bridge, his response to the situation offered a simple yet profound reminder: that unity is always possible, even in the most unexpected of circumstances.

Stewart’s performance in London will undoubtedly go down in history as one of the most defining moments of his storied career. His ability to turn a potentially volatile situation into a powerful symbol of unity and pride serves as a reminder of the unifying power of music. It’s a testament to the enduring relevance of Stewart’s artistry, as well as his unwavering commitment to using his platform for good. As the final notes of “God Save the King/Queen” reverberated through the air, the crowd was left not just with a memorable performance, but with a deeper understanding of the profound impact music can have on society.

“I WILL EXPOSE HER!” : Helen Skelton’s ex-husband, Richie Myler Accuses BBC Star of Trying to “SABOTAGE” His Life .

Helen Skelton’s ex-husband, Richie Myler, claims the BBC star is trying to “sab0tage” his life: “I will exp0se her”

Helen Skelton‘s estranged husband Richie Myler has accused the Strictly star of ‘dragging her heels over divorce proceedings’ and ‘preventing him from moving forward with his life.’

The BBC favourite, 40, is yet to sign off their divorce despite receiving the decree nisi approved by the courts saying there is no reason why the couple cannot formally separate.

Richie, 33, and Helen separated in April 2022 and shortly afterwards the rugby league ace started a new romance with Stephanie Thirkill, the daughter of the multi-millionaire President of the Leeds Rhinos club he plays for, and 12 months later they welcomed their first baby together.

The couple were married for over eight years and share three children, including their youngest Elsie, who was born just four months before Helen announced the end of her relationship with Richie.

A source close to the exes says that Helen’s refusal to cooperate has left Richie ‘frustrated because he wants to move on with his life’ and ‘nobody can understand her continued delay.’

Helen Skelton ‘s estranged husband Richie Myler has accused the Strictly star of ‘dragging her heels over divorce proceedings’ and ‘preventing him from moving forward with his life’

Richie and Helen separated in April 2022 and shortly afterwards the rugby league ace started a new romance with Stephanie Thirkill, the daughter of the multi-millionaire President of the Leeds Rhinos club he plays for

The couple were married for over eight years and share three children, including their youngest Elsie, who was born just four months before Helen announced the end of her relationship with Richie (pictured in June 2014)

They explained: ‘There is a feeling that Helen’s resistance to sign the papers is because she is fearful Richie will propose to new partner Stephanie and she’s just not ready to cope with that.’

A separate source said: ‘Helen is the person who filed for divorce and while it’s incredibly emotional saying goodbye to her marriage, there’s no reason why she would want to prevent it from being official.’

MailOnline revealed in August that Helen was issued a decree nisi and from September 26 the former Blue Peter presenter was able to apply for a decree absolute, which will officially end her marriage to Richie.

But according to a source, Helen, who is the only party that can apply for the decree absolute given she filed for the divorce, and her solicitor have gone ‘radio silent’ and Richie is struggling to understand the reason for the holdup.

Richie and new partner Stephanie welcomed their daughter Olivia in May, with pals close to the pair saying their long-term plan is to one day get married.

Two weeks ago, Stephanie commented on an Instagram post shared by Richie marking the end of the 2023 rugby season, saying she was ‘proud’ of him ‘both on and off the pitch.’

Meanwhile, Helen is the primary carer for her children Ernie, eight, Louis, six, and 22-month-old Elsie.

MailOnline has contacted Helen and Richie’s representatives for comment.

A source close to the exes says that Helen’s refusal to cooperate has left Richie ‘frustrated because he wants to move on with his life’ and ‘nobody can understand her continued delay’

Helen is the primary carer for her children Ernie, eight, Louis, six, and 22-month-old Elsie, of whom she shares with ex-husband Richie

Helen’s heartache sparked her decision to join Strictly last year, with the presenter now admitting that she struggled to feel ‘sexy’ while appearing on the show (pictured in December 2022)

The news follows the release of Helen’s autobiography In My Stride, in which she speaks about the former couple’s split for the first time.

Helen’s heartache sparked her decision to join Strictly last year, with the presenter now admitting that she struggled to feel ‘sexy’ even when encouraged by her professional dance partner Gorka Marquez.

She penned: ‘In week two, Gorka asked me why I didn’t feel sexy.

‘It was an awkward question that immediately made me cringe.

‘Why ask me that? I was just there for the banter. I have never sexy, I was the cute and funny type.

‘He was asking a woman with three children under six, whose husband had just left her and was with another woman, TO BE SEXY.

‘I thought, “Who would feel good about themselves in that scenario?”‘

She also recalls her ‘shock’ at discovering her marriage to Richie was over and says as ‘cliche’ and it sounds, she didn’t foresee their breakup.

Helen added: ‘I was in shock. I know that following break-ups, people often say they didn’t see it coming and it sounds like a cliche, but that was me.’

65 DAYS WITHOUT FOOD and a woman on remand says she is “dying in this cell”. the hunger strike at hmp new hall is now being compared to the darkest chapters of british prison history, raising urgent questions about justice, delay and duty of care.

Hunger striker says ‘I’m dying in this cell’ after 65 days without food in prison

Heba Muraisi said she is struggling to breathe and has difficulty concentrating as she approaches 66 days on hunger strike while on remand in prison (Picture: Prisoners for Palestine)
A hunger striker on remand over her alleged role in a Palestine Action raid has said she is ‘deteriorating’ and struggling to breathe.

Heba Muraisi is on day 65 without food after becoming the first member of an initial group of eight prisoners to begin the action.

Struggling to record audio over the course of several days, she said she is ‘terrified’ but kept going by ‘love and solidarity’ as her condition worsens at HMP New Hall in Flockton, West Yorkshire.

The hunger strike is believed to be the largest of its type in the British Isles since 1981, when 10 Irish prisoners died.

They included IRA leader Bobby Sands, who went 66 days without food.

The 31-year-old spent almost a week recording the answers to questions from Metro as she is having difficulty concentrating.

‘As each day passes I get weaker, aches worsen, headaches are frequent and concentrating is extremely difficult,’ she said.

‘My body shakes, I get dizzy to the point of nausea and now breathing is getting hard. I am deteriorating in this cell, I am dying.’

Supporters of the Palestine Action hunger strikers hold pictures showing three of the group including Heba Muraisi (Picture: Guy Smallman/Getty Images)

‘Denied communication’

The protester, from Barnet, north London, is awaiting trial over her alleged role in the break-in at a research and development facility owned by Elbit Systems, a UK subsidiary of an Israeli defence firm, in Filton near Bristol.

The lifeguard and florist was arrested in a dawn raid on November 19 last year, according to support group Prisoners for Palestine.

Her trial is not scheduled to take place until June, by which time she will have spent close to two years in prison on remand.

Muraisi said: ‘Prison is prison, it’s the same oppressive system under the false pretence that it is rehabilitation.

‘Here I’ve been heavily restricted and monitored, visitors not being approved, phone numbers being rejected including doctors, emails getting blocked, my legal team has been ignored.

‘On day 45 of my hunger strike I was threatened to be forcefully moved by a custodial manager in the presence of a senior officer.

‘I was moved away from my support system I had built, and the only friend I had made on this new wing was recently just moved.’

Heba Muraisi is on hunger strike at HMP New Hall in West Yorkshire as she awaits trial over her alleged role in a Palestine Action raid (Picture: Prisoners for Palestine)

What can happen during a hunger strike?

Ian Miller, a historian of hunger strikes in British prisons, told Metro that a hunger strike can typically play out physiologically as follows:

Days One to Seven: decreasing heart rate, physical wasting, weight loss (as bodies eat up their fat reserves in the adipose tissue.

Days Eight to Fourteen: Bodies begin using glycogen stores (energy located in the liver and muscles). Ammonia produced giving a distinctive smell. Weight loss slows down. Loss of heart mass causing a slow heart beat.

Days Fifteen Onwards: Tendencies to collapse and become bedbound. Nightmares very common early on. Physical and psychological health worsens significantly. Very disturbed sleep. ‘Raving all night’, as one hunger strike termed it in the 1920s.

Around twenty to sixty/seventy days: Patients essentially in a state of complete exhaustion, but often still conscious until around 50 days.

Over 70 days: With zero medical intervention or food, this seems to be roughly the limit of survival. In 1920, hunger striker Terence MacSwiney lasted 74 days before he died.

Mum’s prayers

Teuta Hoxha, Kamran Ahmed and Lewie Chiaramello are also taking part in the hunger strike, while Amu Gib, Jon Cink, Umer Khalid and Qesser Zuhrah have ‘paused’ their participation.

All eight are on remand, charged with offences relating to break-ins and criminal damage either at Elbit in August 2024 or another raid at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire in June last year.

The protesters’ demands include ‘end all censorship’ of communication and correspondence in jail, immediate bail, ‘right to a fair trial’, de-proscribing Palestine Action and shutting Elbit down.

Muraisi, who has family in Rafah on the Gaza Strip, has previously stated that she ‘will not compromise until all demands are met’ and will ‘continue to fight and resist’ in prison.

Heba Muraisi looks outside her prison cell at HMP New Hall as she continues her hunger strike while on remand (Picture: Prisoners for Palestine)
She said: ‘It’s the love and solidarity from the people and my mum’s duas (personal prayer) that give me strength.

‘And it’s the rage from the injustice my comrades and I are facing that keeps me going. I’m well aware that things could turn at any minute, I’m terrified, I’d be stupid not to be.

‘As of today, I’ve been held on remand for 409 days while awaiting trial.

‘To make things worse I’ve been moved nearly 188 miles up north away from my family and support system.’

Muraisi has daily calls with her mum but said: ‘When New Hall cut off my phone line for ridiculous security reasons it just causes unnecessary distress for her.’ Asked if her family supported her hunger strike, she replied: ‘I can’t say that my family support my current actions, but they understand why I’m doing it.’

From top left: Qesser Zuhrah, Amu Gib, Heba Muraisi, Jon Cink, Teuta Hoxha, Kamran Ahmed, Lewie Chiaramello and Muhammed Umer Khalid (Picture: Prisoners for Palestine)

‘Serious offences’

A spokesperson for Practice Plus Group, which manages healthcare on behalf of the NHS at New Hall, said: ‘We provide compassionate, evidence-based care in prisons and manage any patients who are refusing food in accordance with all the relevant policies and protocols, and in partnership with prison teams and the wider NHS.’

The government maintains that it has no records from NHS staff that prison officers have obstructed healthcare.

Lord Timpson, minister of state for prisons, probation and reducing reoffending, said: ‘While very concerning, hunger strikes are not a new issue for our prisons.

‘Over the last five years, we’ve averaged over 200 a year and we have longstanding procedures in place to ensure prisoner safety.

‘Prison healthcare teams provide NHS care and continuously monitor the situation. HMPPS are clear that claims that hospital care is being refused are entirely misleading – they will always be taken when needed and a number of these prisoners have already been treated in hospital.

‘These prisoners are charged with serious offences including aggravated burglary and criminal damage.

‘Remand decisions are for independent judges, and lawyers can make representations to the court on behalf of their clients.

‘Ministers will not meet with them – we have a justice system that is based on the separation of powers, and the independent judiciary is the cornerstone of our system.

‘It would be entirely unconstitutional and inappropriate for ministers to intervene in ongoing legal cases.’