Blog

Victoria Beckham has kept son Brooklyn’s milk teeth for more than two decades.

The Spice Girl and fashion designer, 50, took to Instagram on Sunday to share a snap of the 25-year-old’s baby teeth as she joked about her ‘sentimental’ nature.

She shares Brooklyn – as well as Harper, 12, Cruz, 19 and  Romeo, 21 – with her husband David, 49.

Posting the snap to Instagram Stories, the WAG penned: ‘Not that I’m sentimental but… U think I can throw your baby teeth away @brooklynpeltzbeckham?? (sic)’.

Brooklyn is still yet to give his mother a public answer as to whether she can throw away some of his first teeth.

+9
View gallery

Victoria Beckham revealed she still has son Brooklyn’s milk teeth after two decades because she’s ‘sentimental’ (pictured together in 1999)

+9
View gallery

The Spice Girl and fashion designer, 50, took to Instagram on Sunday to share a snap of the 25-year-old’s baby teeth as she joked about her ‘sentimental’ nature

+9
View gallery

Brooklyn is still yet to give his mother a public answer as to whether she can throw away some of his first teeth (pictured with his parents)

Victoria has proven time and time again that she is every inch the doting mother as continuously keeps her fans updated about their family life.

Her post came just days after the fashionista also revealed close family details about her daughter Harper.

Harper created her mother a PowerPoint presentation to try and convince her to let her have a perm.

In an interview with Grazia, she shared how Harper is wanting to start and try some beauty treatments.

She told how she created the presentation on the computer and showed it to her and David in the hopes of letting her take a trip to the hairdressers.

Harper has long straight blonde hair and a perm uses chemicals to make naturally straight hair curly.

However, despite Harper going to the effort of making the PowerPoint – Victoria admitted that her response to the request was ‘absolutely not’.

Victoria explained her negative response was born from a bad personal experience of having a perm when she was a teenager.

+9
View gallery

She shares Brooklyn, 25, – as well as Harper, 12, Cruz, 19 and Romeo, 21 – with her husband David, 49

Victoria Beckham celebrates as she walks without boot and crutches

Back in 2022 Victoria shared a snap of her perm as she revealed what she considered to be her ‘teenage dirtbag moments’ as she hopped onto a TikTok trend.

She shared a reel of some of her more unexpected throwback fashion moments, with the Wheatus song, Teenage Dirtbag, played over the top.

The trend saw TikTokers showing off their awkward and embarrassing teenage years and among the pictures Victoria shared were her wearing a silver latex boob tube as well as showing off a giant pout with overlined lips.

She was also sporting an oversized shiny bomber jacket, which were all the rage in the 90s, as well as a giant perm, a sharp contrast to her sleek brunette hairdo.

In the Grazia interview Victoria also revealed that Harper had asked her whether netball was ‘strictly necessary’ when it would probably ‘ruin her nails’.

Elsewhere in the chat she spoke about her changing relationship with her appearance and says she is now less harsh on herself about what she eats and drinks.

She said: ‘You just become more accepting, don’t you? This is how I look. I’m going to make the best of it, work hard at it.

‘I’m very disciplined with the way that I eat, the way that I work out and the way I work. That’s just who I am.

‘But I do like to have a drink and I’m not going to be one these, ‘Ah, there are too many calories in a glass of wine’ types. Whatever. Life’s too short. Let’s have a nice time.’

+9
View gallery

Her motherly post came just days after she revealed close family details about her daughter Harper as she created a PowerPoint presentation to convince her to let her have a perm

+9
View gallery

Victoria explained her negative response was born from a bad personal experience of having a perm when she was a teenager (seen)

+9
View gallery

Harper has long straight blonde hair and a perm uses chemicals to make naturally straight hair curly

Harper Beckham visits her mother Victoria’s store in London

It comes after earlier this month Harper had fun at her mother’s flagship store in Dover Street.

Victoria, who turned 50 in April, shared a video to her Instagram Story of Harper posing around the shop and modelling its items.

At the beginning of the Story, Harper could be heard saying: ‘Come with me to visit Victoria Beckham’s shop on Dover Street.’

Victoria set the fun clip to The Lovin’ Spoonful’s Do You Believe In Magic? and wrote over the top: ‘#HarperSeven takes over 36 Dover Street!! Kisses @davidbeckham xx’.

Harper wore a grey hoodie, darker grey jeans, and a pair of white, grey, and black Nike trainers.

Meghan Markle appeared to mock her first curtsy to the late Queen Elizabeth and Prince Harry did not seem impressed, says body language expert.

Prince Harry made a “cut-off” gesture after Meghan Markle appeared to “mock” her first curtsy to the late Queen Elizabeth, a body language expert has claimed, a move which was branded a “step too far”.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex made a series of revelations about their life within the Royal Family in the Netflix docuseries, Harry & Meghan.

In the bombshell show, the couple opened up about Meghan’s first meeting with the late monarch.

The meeting took place when Harry and Meghan were in Windsor to have lunch at the Royal Lodge with Princess Eugenie.

Harry said: “How do you explain that to people? How do you explain that you bow to your grandmother? And that you will need to curtsy. Especially to an American. That’s weird.”

 

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spoke about the Royal Family in their docuseries (Image: Netflix)

Meghan added: “Now I’m starting to realise ‘This is a big deal’. I mean, Americans will understand this… We have medieval times, dinner and tournament. It was like that.”

It was then that the duchess re-enacted the moment she met the late Queen and performed a long and exaggerated curtsy before saying while giggling: “Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty”, while the camera showed Harry.

No body language expert Judi James said the scene showed Harry’s “discomfort” as he performed one “cut off” gesture.

She told The Mirror: “Her [Meghan’s] joke is self-effacing as she speaks about her curtsy when she first met the late Queen. Her smile becomes asymmetric, pulling up on one side to register a shared joke.”

 

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made several revelation in the Netflix docuseries (Image: Netflix)
 

But she added: “Harry, however, is already watching her carefully, turning to gaze at the side of her face with his own facial expression looking less turned to ‘fun’ than hers.

“Meghan does an extravagant mock-curtsey that does, as she says, look Medieval. It takes her eight seconds to perform, making it a long joke but there is no change in Harry’s more serious facial expression until the end, when he lets out a small, mirthless laugh.

“As Meghan mentions ‘Your Majesty’, the direct reference to the late Queen, it does seem a small step too far for Harry who quickly drops his head down to perform a cut-off ritual that partially hides his face, suggesting some discomfort at this point.”

 

Several members of the Spice Girls were left ‘furious’ this week after unflattering details from a conversation emerged in court documents, according to reports.

Mel B, Geri Halliwell and Emma Bunton are said to have been left red-faced after a private conversation between the group was leaked in a defamation case.

According to The Sun, Mel B told her bandmates Geri and Emma that ‘charity doesn’t pay the bills’, during an apparent discussion about reuniting for a gig.

The publication reported that the leaked messages – which were revealed as part of a defamation case in the United States on Wednesday – have infuriated the stars.

It is expected that the embarrassment will continue over a catty exchange between the three band members over their now close-pal Victoria Beckham.

+12

Several members of the Spice Girls were left ‘furious’ this week after unflattering details from a conversation emerged in court documents, according to reports

+12

It is expected that the embarrassment will continue over a catty exchange between the three band members over their now close-pal Victoria Beckham

While the group are seemingly thick as thieves again now, there is apparently a string of emails gossiping about the way Victoria acted at the Viva Forever! West End musical premiere on December 11, 2012.

The fashion designer delayed the curtain call of the West End musical based on the Spice Girls’ biggest hits by 15 minutes after getting stuck in traffic.

Once she arrived, she decided to set separately from the rest of the group, taking her seat two rows behind the other women with her husband David and their kids.

According to the publications insider, Victoria’s snub did not go down well with Mel B in particular.

The move came just months after the group lauded ‘girl power’ and reunited as a five-piece at the London Olympics closing ceremony.

It has also been reported that they called in legal assistance in case Victoria tried to stop them from going ahead with a potential tour.

Years later, Mel B, Geri and Emma are said to have planned a comeback – which never happened – without Victoria and Mel C.

It is awkward timing for the group, who now on seemingly good terms after recently celebrating Victoria’s 50th birthday together at her party in London.

+12

Mel B , Geri Halliwell and Emma Bunton are said to have been left red-faced after a private conversation between the group was leaked in a defamation case

+12

While the group are seemingly thick as thieves again now, there is apparently a string of emails gossiping about the way Victoria acted at the Viva Forever! West End musical premiere on December 11, 2012 (the group pictured without Victoria)

The Spice Girls reunite at Victoria Beckham’s 50th birthday bash

Hopefully the emergence of a group chat between Geri, Emma and Mel B won’t cause any tension between the pals.

The report claims that after Mel commented that ‘charity doesn’t pay’, Geri told her that she ‘hopes nobody ever hacks your texts’.

Mel allegedly responded: ‘Why? My texts are fine,’ before adding: ‘Like I said charity doesn’t pay the bills everyone knows that.’

The source said: ‘This is highly embarrassing for the girls as it doesn’t exactly chime with their core messages. But obviously it was a fair few years ago now and they’ve all kissed and made up since then.

‘Just look at how happy they were together celebrating Victoria’s 50th birthday back in April, belting out their greatest hits together after a few drinks. The hatchet is well and truly buried.’

MailOnline contacted a representative for the Spice Girls for comment.

+12

The fashion designer delayed the curtain call of the West End musical based on the Spice Girls’ biggest hits by 15 minutes after getting stuck in traffic

+12

Once she arrived, she decided to set separately from the rest of the group, taking her seat two rows behind the other women with her husband David and their kids

Cruz Beckham shares video of the Spice Girls singing Mama

The leak will be unwelcome news to Geri, who has already been engulfed in a leaked messages scandal with her husband Christian Horner earlier this year.

On Wednesday, Geri made her first public appearance alone on at the Hay Festival where she is promoting her latest book, Rosie Frost and the Falcon Queen.

Geri beamed as she held a signing for her new novel which features main character Rosie, the star describes as ‘a new kind of hero for today’s young readers.’

One onlooker said: ‘Geri looked really smiley and happy. She was having her photo take with loads of kids and even two female police officers who had used their lunch break to meet her.

‘There were lots of people queuing to see their favourite Spice Girl.’

Before her talk the former Spice Girl hung out in the festival’s authors tent alongside the BBC football pundit, Gary Lineker.

According to an insider, Geri was in great spirits asking the staff ‘thousands’ of questions, taking interest in fellow speakers and asking for copies of books – in particular, one about the importance of mushrooms.

However, she refused to address her anguish over leaked flirtatious messages which her husband of nine years, Red Bull boss Christian, allegedly sent to a female colleague when asked by the Mail.

In February he found himself under investigation following an accusation of ‘inappropriate behaviour’, for which he was later cleared.

The woman, in her 40s, went to HR at the Formula 1 team after she received the messages from Horner, often late at night.

She accused him of ‘coercive behaviour’ but an internal inquiry chaired by an unknown KC appointed by Red Bull cleared him. Horner has strongly denied any wrongdoing.

Geri Horner celebrates husband as he marks his 50th birthday

+12

On Wednesday, Ger i made her first public appearance alone on at the Hay Festival where she is promoting her latest book, Rosie Frost and the Falcon Queen

+12

She refused to address her anguish over leaked flirtatious messages which husband of nine years, Red Bull boss Christian, allegedly sent to a female colleague, when asked by the Mail

+12

In February he found himself under investigation following an accusation of ‘inappropriate behaviour’, for which he was later cleared (pictured: The Horners in 2023)

Oprah Winfrey has hope for the royal family, but is she really someone who should be weighing in?

On Sunday, the talk show host sat down with  to discuss her upcoming Apple TV+ documentary  about the late acting legend Sidney Poitier while at the Toronto Film Festival. In the process, she was asked to discuss her thoughts on another kind of legend: the legendary feud between the royal family! Something she knows a thing or two about since she was the one to interview Prince Harry and Meghan Markle during their explosive tell-all chat in 2020!

When asked by reporter Jenn Lahmers if Queen Elizabeth II’s death will be a chance for the couple to “heal some wounds” with the rest of the royals, Oprah mused:

“Well, this is what I think, I think in all families — you know, my father passed recently, this summer, and when all families come together for a common ceremony, the ritual of, you know, burying your dead, there’s an opportunity for peacemaking… And hopefully, there will be that.”

Seems like she’s got her fingers crossed that the family will mend their broken fences! Hear her discuss the sticky situation between the famous family (below)!

It’s not the first time we’ve heard this sentiment! Earlier this week, sources told the  that Harry and Prince William’s cousin Peter Phillips could help pull them together in this dark time — and he’s already acting as a “peacemaker.” Sounds like just about everyone is hoping to see the brothers unite again, and not just for show. But only time will tell if they can truly forgive and forget. Meanwhile, fans are having a hard time forgetting Oprah’s history with the royal family — and her involvement in the feud!

After the interview hit the internet, royal fans were outraged to hear the media personality discussing the family’s feud considering she helped ignite it by hosting Harry and Meghan’s CBS special. Fans argued on Twitter:

“Oprah talks about ‘burying the dead’ and says she hopes it will help Prince Harry and Meghan ‘make peace’ with the royals. She’s priceless isn’t she. Never scrutinised a word [Harry and Meghan] said… She calls herself a serious talk show host.”

“Oprah forgets she started this. Maybe an apology would help with the peacemaking.”

“Oprah, you had plenty of opportunities to ask real questions and dispute some of the things said. But, you didn’t. And trying to convince the public that this wasn’t choreographed to the nth degree? Come on, Sis. You can’t fool us anymore…”

“Hey @Oprah if you cared for that family you wouldn’t have given them a platform to badmouth the RF family. After your interview the anger between them widened. So stop the BS talk.”

“Oprah has a cheek, when she provided the platform for Meghan to trash our Queen and Royal Family – and encouraged her!”

Oprah trying to do a U-turn out of the RF drama she fully soaked and bathed in last year… pic.twitter.com/2Tf6yRfAXr

— Lavender (@BlewLavender) September 12, 2022

Yeesh!!

Is Oprah really to blame?! There’s a reason Harry and Meghan left the UK! Things were pretty f**ked up before the special…

While the interview did give the controversy a larger platform, it’s not like she had anything to do with the bombshells her guests decided to reveal. And it’s likely the Duke and Duchess of Sus𝓈ℯ𝓍 would have found someone else to interview them if Oprah said no. At the end of the day, they’re the ones who opened their mouths, and only they and the other royals really know the truth about what happened behind the scenes.

But what do YOU think, Perezcious readers? Does Oprah owe an apology? Is it rude of her to be commenting on the drama because of her history with Harry and Meghan? Sound OFF (below)!

The recent rumors surrounding Prince William, Kate Middleton, and Rose Hanbury have sent shockwaves through the British Royal Family and the public alike. Reports suggest that Rose Hanbury, a close friend of Kate Middleton’s, may be pregnant with Prince William’s child, leading to speculation about the state of William and Kate’s marriage.

The situation is complicated by rumors that Prince William is allegedly having an affair with Rose Hanbury. These rumors surfaced in 2019, prompting Kate Middleton to sever ties with Rose amid reports of William’s infidelity. The alleged affair reportedly took place while Kate was pregnant with their third child, Prince Louis.

Rose Hanbury, an aristocrat and socialite, has been at the center of speculation for years due to her close relationship with the royal couple. Despite attending major royal events and being a part of William and Kate’s inner circle, Rose’s rumored affair with William has cast a shadow over their friendship.

Adding another layer to the controversy is the speculation surrounding Rose Hanbury’s husband, David Cholmondeley, the Marquess of Cholmondeley. Rumors suggest that David may be gay and allegedly has a long-term romantic relationship with a French novelist and photographer, François-Marie Banier. Some speculate that David’s marriage to Rose was arranged to secure a male heir for his estate.

The situation has sparked intense scrutiny and debate among royal watchers and the public. Many are questioning the authenticity of William and Kate’s marriage and whether the royal family is being transparent about the situation. Some are calling for greater accountability and transparency from the monarchy, particularly considering the use of taxpayer funds to support their lifestyle.

As the rumors continue to circulate and speculation mounts, the British Royal Family finds itself embroiled in yet another scandal, further fueling calls for reform and modernization within the institution. The truth behind the rumors remains unclear, but the ongoing speculation underscores the intense public interest in the private lives of the royals and the complexities of their relationships.

Royal photographer Arthur Edwards MBE told Matt Wilkinson, host of The Sun’s new show Royal Exclusive, that the Sussexes’ big interview with Oprah Winfrey was “so one-sided”.

5

Harry and Meghan are interviewed by Oprah WinfreyCredit: Reuters

5

Kate and Charles pictured together in London, 2022Credit: PA
During the March 2021 interview, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made a series of shocking allegations.

The pair sparked a race row by alleging an unnamed member of the Royal Family spoke about “how dark his (Archie’s) skin might be when he’s born”.

During the Oprah interview, Meghan also said she was prevented from seeking mental health support when she was in crisis.

It’s understood the Royal Family were left deeply upset by the allegations made.

In the days following the interview airing in Britain, Prince William was forced into the unprecedented position of saying the royals “are very much not a racist family”.

He spoke out on an official visit to a school after the Queen had released a carefully-worded statement saying she was “saddened” by the interview but “recollections may vary”.

Omid Scobie’s early Dutch version of his hatchet-job book Endgame, which came out in 2023, suggested Kate Middleton and King Charles were the Royals who made remarks about Archie’s skin colour.

Speaking to Royal Exclusive, Arthur Edwards MBE said: “The first big interview they did with Oprah Winfrey… I think about watching it now and, you know, the thing about Archie and the colour of his skin and I was – I knew they’d be seething.

“I knew that the Queen would be seething, I knew that the Prince of Wales, Prince Charles would be seething, it would be so unfair because one thing they are not is racists. They are not.

“I’ve been with the King all over Africa, all over South America, I’ve never seen – only just engaging and enjoying the company of these people.

“So, you know, in no way would he be like that. He’s just a – it’s just an unfair thing to say.

“But, you know, she delivered it like an actress delivered it, and Oprah responded going ‘wow’.

“It was awful.”

Harry had told Oprah he felt let down by his family – and that he was barely speaking to his brother, describing their relationship as “space”.

He claimed his father Charles stopped taking his calls after Megxit and he was financially cut off by the Royal Family.

He also discussed his relationship with William, saying he loved him “to bits” but he and the future king were “on different paths”.

5

Harry and Meghan during episode 6 of their Netflix documentaryCredit: Netflix

5

Charles and Harry at the Opening Ceremony of the Invictus Games, 2014Credit: Getty

5

William and Kate in Edinburgh, July 5, 2023Credit: AP
William was said to be “very upset” with the interview.

Arthur’s comments come after Princess Diana’s former bodyguard insisted the Royal Family are not racist – and said he never saw a hint of it in the 16 years he worked with them.

Speaking on The Sun’s Royal Exclusive show, Ken Wharfe said he was adamant there was no racism with The Firm – despite rumours swirling in recent years.

Omid Scobie’s early Dutch version of his hatchet-job book Endgame suggested Kate and Charles were the two members who made remarks about the skin colour of the pair’s first child.

But Ken, who worked alongside the royals for more than a decade, said this had to be wrong.

He told The Sun: “I worked with every single member of the royal family over 16 years.

“I never saw one hint of racism, the royal family are not racist.

“They represent the very best in my view. I’m not saying they’re perfect but on this particular subject, no they’re not.”

History of Royal Family racism claims

In a 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle alleged that an unnamed member of the Royal Family had raised concerns about their son Archie’s skin colour while Meghan was pregnant.

Speaking about her son, who was born in 2019, Meghan claimed there were “concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born”.

The couple refused to name the alleged royal racist but Oprah said she was told it was not the Queen or Prince Philip.

Queen Elizabeth II released a statement almost two days after the chat saying the claims would be taken “very seriously”.

She said allegations that a member of the family raised concerns over the colour of Archie’s skin would be investigated and “addressed privately”

A statement from the palace said: “The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan.

“The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning. Whilst some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately.

“Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved family members.”

Prince Harry later went on to say that people shouldn’t be blamed for “unconscious bias”.

Speaking on a podcast with Dax Shepard in May 2021, Harry said “everyone has a bias of sorts”.

But he said “choosing to do nothing” when you realise you have “unconscious bias” is the problem.

Harry told the Armchair Expert podcast: “I thought I knew, having travelled so much and meet so many, such a diverse group as possible, I thought I understood life, especially bearing in mind the countries I was going to were people of colour.

“But then I was really shocked when I started doing therapy and that bubble was burst and I started doing my own work, like a lot of work to uncover and understand unconscious bias.

“And I was like wow, I thought since I screwed up and then did the work, I thought I then knew but I didn’t and I still don’t fully know. It’s a constant working process and every one of us has it.”

Harry told Dax the “world is changing” with a “multi-racial” movement happening driven by young people.

He added: “Unconscious bias, the way I understand it, it’s not something that’s wrong with you, you don’t have to be defensive about it. No one is blaming you, but the moment you realise you have it, what are you going to do about it?

“Because if you choose to do nothing, then you are continuing to fuel the problem, you are heading towards racism.

“Unconscious bias is inherent unfortunately in every single one of us, but it’s important to educate yourself to be more aware of the problems and be part of the solution.”

Omid Scobie’s early Dutch version of his book Endgame suggested Kate and Charles were the two Royals who made remarks about the skin colour of Harry and Meghan’s first child, Archie.

The poisonous claims were pilloried by Royal experts and in the fall out Scobie was blasted for peddling “bulls**t” excuses about how the names were included in the Dutch translation.

The book was released in November 2023.

In the English version Scobie writes: “In the pages of these private letters, two identities were revealed. UK laws prevent me from reporting who they were.”

QUEEN ELIZABETH II had a very good sense of humour, according to one royal insider. Her former Royal Protection Officer recalled a practical joke she pulled on an unsuspecting couple.

As the country mourns Queen Elizabeth II, many Britons will reminisce on the monarch’s fine character, including her humour.

 

During the Platinum Jubilee celebrations in June, former Royal Protection Officer Richard Griffin told Sky News about a prank the Queen played at Balmoral.

The royal insider revealed that he could think of “101 examples” of the Queen’s “wit and charm” when he worked as the Queen’s Police Officer.

However, he recalled one of his “favourite stories” of the Queen’s fabulous sense of humour.

Richard revealed that the Queen used to visit Craigowan house in Balmoral for a weekend in May.

 

Royal insider recalls the Queen’s best practical joke – ‘as quick as a flash’ (Image: Sky News / Getty)

She used to like to have picnics in the area, which were typically uneventful.

Usually, it would just be the Queen and Richard on these outings, and the pair would “meet nobody”.

But there was one particular outing when they ran into two tourists.

These were Americans who happened to be on a walking holiday in the area.

 

It was immediately obvious that the visitors “did not recognise the Queen” and they spoke to her as if she was a regular commoner.

The tourists asked the Queen where she lived, to which she replied: “I live in London, but I’ve got a holiday home on the other side of the hills.”

The Queen revealed she had been coming up to the area for about 80 years, ever since she was a little girl.

One of the tourists, oblivious, suggested that if she had been to the area so many times, perhaps she had met the Queen.

Craigowan house on the Balmoral Estate (Image: Getty)

The modest monarch didn’t let on to who she was at all, and proceeded to fool the travellers.

Richard recalled that “as quick as a flash” the Queen responded: “Well I haven’t, but Dick here meets her regularly.”

The tourists then focussed their attention on Richard, who asked him what the Queen was really like.

He joked that the monarch could be a little bit “cantankerous” but a “lovely sense of humour”.

Richard Griffin revealed that the Queen was full of ‘wit and charm’ (Image: Getty)

One of the tourists gave his camera to the Queen and asked her if she could take a picture with Richard.

Richard concluded: “Then we swapped places and I took a picture of them with the Queen and I never let on.”

Later, HRH joked to Richard that she would love to be “a fly on the wall” when she penny finally drops for the travellers.

They joked that the travellers would show their friends pictures of the Queen and Richard – only to be told who they really were.

Meghan and Harry were recently photographed having dinner with Princess Eugenie and her husband Jack Brooksbank in Hollywood.

Meghan’s body language in front of paparazzi suggests she is not ‘uncomfortable’ – claim (Image: Getty)

Body language expert Jesus Enrique Rosas shared on his YouTube channel The Body Language Guy “the clues” that expose how these photos “are staged to look like someone broke into their privacy”. Jesus Enrique suggested that Meghan and Harry could have planned these pictures and they may enjoy being photographed by paparazzi.

The body language guru suggested that “the first thing you notice is the facial expressions, and oh my God… why is our forever glorious Duchess opening her mouth like that?”

He claimed that Meghan’s expression is exaggerated as she looks extremely excited, which is “strange” when having a casual dinner with friends at a restaurant.

“It’s really nice that the paparazzi made sure that every single shot of Meghan had her laughing or smiling,” he opined.

The body language guru claimed: “We have a paparazzi who took great care to picture Meghan and Harry like they are really glad to be there.”

 

Meghan attending an event in New York with Harry in December. (Image: Getty)

Huge discounts at Amazon, but time is running out

Amazon just launched its latest site-wide sale. Not all of these discounts are worthy of your time, but we’ve found the 23 best Amazon Spring Sale deals with genuine record-low prices. Better hurry as the sale ends soon!

He pointed out that “it was such a coincidence that Jack,” Princess Eugenie’s husband, “was the only one with his back turned”.

The expert opined that Jack sitting there is “interesting” and claimed that Meghan and Harry may have taken the spot where paparazzi would be able to see them.

Jesus Enrique suggested that it is also bizarre how Harry’s top security “lets the paparazzi get near the Duchess”.

“And if they want so much privacy, why are they sitting outdoors, right beside a glass railing… It doesn’t make sense that if you want privacy, you dine in such an open place,” he opined.

Prince Harry voted second most popular royal to succeed King Charles, in shocking new poll

Prince Harry is the surprising second choice to be the next monarch in a new poll, despite his attacks on the Royal Family in his memoir Spare and Netflix TV series. In first place was the first in line to the throne Prince William, who received the vast majority of the votes for who should succeed their father King Charles.

The body language concluded that this could be “a lousy attempt at staging paparazzi photos” and the couple could have planned the “encounter”.

Royal watchers took to the comments section to share their thoughts with @ShortsBetaCompil saying the body language expert “forgot to mention” one point: “The flash reflection on the plastic shows that the photographer used a flash which is noticeable.

“They should have changed tables immediately or turn their back so he wouldn’t have been able to take so many shots if they wanted privacy,” she opined.

 

A body language expert suggested Meghan may be comfortable around paparazzi. (Image: Getty)

 

In fact, this is not the first time a body language expert claims that Meghan has a good relationship with the paparazzi.

Expert Judi James recently told Express.co.uk that an “interesting behaviour” could be observed when the Duchess of Sussex visited Harvest Home for International Women’s Day last month.

Meghan was photographed leaving a restaurant in Hollywood with her assistant and as a group of paparazzi approached her, her assistant seemed to hide from the cameras.

Judi commented: “Meghan’s behaviour with her assistant here is interesting. As they walk together up towards the cameras it’s the assistant who opts to step behind Meghan and out of view.

“She also keeps her head down and seems keen to ensure it’s Meghan they [the photographers] get the shots of, which does imply Meghan is not uncomfortable or unhappy with being snapped in the US, or else she might try to form a barrier from the cameras.”

The body language expert added: “Meghan goes to walk on but her instinctive reaction does seem to be to check her assistant is okay and put an arm out to urge her forward towards the car. It’s the assistant who puts her arm out to override Meghan and get her to carry on first before seeing her safely in the car.”

Meghan even spoke to the photographers. A paparazzi said to her: “Hey Meghan, happy International Women’s Day, you look great by the way.” The Duchess replied “thank you” and later said: “Have a good day guys, thank you!”

Kate and William posed for a stunning photo outside the Taj Mahal in 2016, which Crown Princess Mary and Prince Frederik recently recreated. However, a body language expert exclusively told Express.co.uk that the couples convey completely different “romantic stories”.

Will and Kate’s Taj Mahal pose conveys ‘different romantic story’ to other European royals (Image: Getty)

On April 16, 2016 Kate, Princess of Wales and Prince William were the picture of true love in front of the beautiful Taj Mahal. Earlier this week, Crown Princess Mary and Crown Prince Frederik visited the same site and sat in the exact same place. Body language expert Judi James analysed a photograph of both royal couples and revealed that their romantic styles are very different.

William and Kate’s pose in front of the Taj Mahal was not simply a sweet moment captured in time.

It was actually hugely significant for the couple as it would have echoes of a similar photo Princess Diana posed for by herself at the tail-end of her marriage to Charles.

Judi told Express.co.uk: “These are such iconic royal poses and for William and Kate the moment is even more important and poignant thanks to Diana’s significant solo pose on the same seat when she visited the Taj Mahal during the breakdown of her marriage to Charles.

“For William and Kate then, it was crucial to return to this spot and prove that history doesn’t have to repeat itself.”

Will and Kate are all about ‘unity and identifying as one, strongly-bonded unit’ (Image: Getty)

The expert suggested that William’s deliberate body language might be a nod to his mother, promising her that he would stand by Kate.

She explained: “In William’s mind it might even have been a direct message to his late mother that, unlike his father, he is there with his wife in a loving, happy and long-term relationship that involves friendship as well as affection.”

According to the expert, the love between the pair is clear – “all about unity and identifying as one, strongly-bonded unit” – right from the poses to the outfits.

“They have chosen toning outfits to create a ‘team of two’ vibe and their body language together also looks matching and mirrored, to show like-minded thinking.

“Their torsos are close and they are touching at the knees and along their upper arms.

“The romantic gesture is in the way Kate’s legs slant so that her knees point in towards William’s direction.

“The pair have matching head-tilts and smiles and both have adopted a slightly shy look, with some body self-diminishing rather than a high-status regal look.”

Crown Princess Mary and Crown Prince Frederik posed for a very similar photo almost seven years later

Diana went ‘solo’ on the same seat as Will and Kate during the ‘breakdown of her marriage’ (Image: Getty)

And while their photo also showed a couple deeply in love, Judi observed that they “opted for a different romantic story” on this occasion.

They also do not have the added weight of a royal family tragedy that William and Kate do.

Judi commented: “In their outfits and with the spatial gap between their torsos, plus their non-mirrored body language they seem to be keen to promote their individuality, although they do join at the knees in a linking touch gesture to signal romantic affection.”

‘This couple seem keen to keep to the spirit of the building behind them’ (Image: Getty)

She pointed to the Crown Prince’s devotion to his wife, and suggested that they embody the essence of the Taj Mahal itself.

“With Mary’s regal elegance and upright posture versus Frederik’s more relaxed pose and ready smile, this couple seem keen to keep to the spirit of the building behind them, which is a husband’s romantic gesture to the wife he adored.

“Frederik’s pose hints that he is more than capable of something similar, while William and Kate’s body language suggests a more even-handed style of romance.”

A royal commentator has shared that Prince Harry was once “terrified” over the possibility that Meghan Markle could leave him.

Prince Harry was ‘terrified’ Meghan Markle would leave him, expert claims (Image: GETTY)

Prince Harry was once “terrified” that Meghan Markle would leave him, it has been claimed.

In 2016, around the time that their relationship became public, Harry defended his now-wife in a letter to the media.

The letter read that Harry was “worried” about Meghan’s safety and that she should not have been “subjected to such a storm” – especially so early in their relationship.

Harry’s letter had been live on the Royal Family’s website, but the link has been inactive since the end of 2023.

Speaking on GB News, royal expert Angela Levin said: “On the royal website, they removed the information that in 2016 Harry sent this very, very angry letter to the press.

READ MORE Harry and Meghan urged to make one major move to avoid Netflix disaster

Stay up-to-date with the latest Royal newsJoin us on WhatsApp

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

“It was to say that they were being racist towards Meghan and disturbing her. Now that was when they met.

“It was interesting in 2016, I went to see him and I was told by one of his aides, ‘be very, very careful because he’s just written a letter and he’s terrified that Meghan’s going to leave him’.”

She added: “So actually go very carefully, otherwise he’ll throw you out’. It’s quite an odd way of thinking. You’re going to interview the Prince and then you’re going to have to be really careful. But I managed to write.

“That’s what the issue was, he was terrified that Meghan was going to leave him. It was love at first sight from his point of view.”

READ MORE Royal expert shares moment Harry and Meghan upset Queen before her death

Prince Harry was ‘worried’ about Meghan Markle’s safety, the letter claimed (Image: GETTY)

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

Speaking of the letter now being inactive on the website, Ms Levin said that Harry is “very cross because he felt it should be against the press”.

Prince Harry made reference to the letter in his bombshell memoir Spare, which was released in January 2023.

He wrote: “I showed the essay to Jason (Knauf, former Kensington Palace Communications Secretary), said we needed a course correction immediately.

“No more debate, no more discussion. Within a day, we had a draft. Strong, precise, angry, honest. I didn’t think it would be the end, but maybe the beginning of the end.”

Meghan and Harry have now been married for six years (Image: GETTY)

Additionally, Harry expressed that the statement angered both his father, King Charles and his brother, Prince William.

In Spare, he wrote: “My statement generated a whole new onslaught from my family. Pa and Willy (King Charles and Prince William) were furious. They gave me an earful.

My statement made them look bad, they both said. “Why in hell? Because they’d never put out a statement for their girlfriends, or wives when they were being harassed.”