Blog

  • Shocking news : Prince William weep, Felt cheated and Heart Broken

    Shocking news : Prince William weep, Felt cheated and Heart Broken

    Shocking news : Prince William weep, Felt cheated and Heart Broken after finding out that wife Kate Middleton had a son with another man after celebrated 13 years married ‘ File a divorce

    Shocking news : Prince William weep, felt cheated and deserved after finding out that wife Kate Middleton had a son with another man after celebrate 13 years married ' wants a divorce
    The fairytale romance between the Prince and Princess of Wales was one ‘strategically’ orchestrated by Kate, reveals a source.

    Prince William and Kate Middleton – who celebrated their 13th wedding anniversary yesterday – met while studying at St Andrew’s university in Scotland in 2001, but that was no coincidence, reports Elle magazine.

     

    According to Cambridge-educated royal historian Robert Lacey, Kate, 42, enacted an airtight ploy to capture the future king, one which involved ditching her university in favour of one attended by William and even enticing him with a dress.

    In Lacey’s 2020 book Battle of Brothers: William and Harry – The Inside Story of a Family in Tumult, he depicted a young Kate as a ‘strategic lady’ who made sacrifices to get what she wanted.

    He wrote: ‘Kate was very strategic. She gave up her place at one of Britain’s premier universities, Edinburgh, and opted for another one [St. Andrews] that probably didn’t have the same academic standard.

    She had already been to Edinburgh to get her flat accommodations sorted out but switched universities and switched her courses to history of art because that was William’s. She delayed her own education by a year and even takes the chance she won’t get into St. Andrews’.

    The historian also shared how the future royal planned to dazzle William during a student charity fashion show – one which William is thought to have paid £200 to enter.

    It’s no news that Kate – 19 at the time – stunned onlookers and later on the public with that now very famous risqué see-through dress.

    However Lacey explained that it was an added racy touch that would ensure she captured the future king’s attention.

    In the book, he described Kate as walking down the runway at the student show – aptly titled ‘The Art of Seduction’ – before stripping off an extra layer of clothing to reveal her svelte physique.

    The move would reportedly lead William to comment to his friends ‘Wow, Kate’s hot.’

    The famous fashion exhibit It is said to be the turning point in the couple’s relationship, as they eventually went from close friends to developing romantic feelings for each other.

    The dress itself, which cost £30 to make, is now so significant in the love story between the two students, who went on to marry and have three children, that it sold for a staggering £78,000 at auction following the catwalk show and became one of Kate’s best-known fashion moments.

    The dress marked a seminal moment in cementing Kate’s reputation as a style icon – but perhaps even more significantly, it turned Prince William’s head and, from then on, the two St Andrews students became romantically involved.

    Until that night, William thought of solid, dependable Kate only as a sympathetic and sensible friend. For it was her wise counsel which had helped him through his first-term ‘wobble’ when he felt miserable and was torturing himself about whether to quit the university at the Scottish seaside town.

    During her daily routine, Kate rarely deviated from what one friend described as ‘a very public school look of Ralph Lauren shirts, V-neck jumpers and jeans’.

    Accounts of what happened at an after-show party vary. It is generally agreed that, having had a bit to drink, William complimented Kate lavishly, then made a clumsy pass: a kiss on the hand, according to one account; a bolder move, in another version, with him ‘leaning in’ for an amorous ‘smacker’.

    Either way, Kate decorously rebuffed him.

    Despite a reportedly clumsy beginning to their romance; something certainly appeared to shift – and within a few weeks, both had dumped their respective partners.

    They had both started at the university six months earlier, and the Prince had already identified Kate as a possible flatmate for the house-share he was putting together for his second year.

    They got on well and shared an interest in sport and the outdoors, as well as a ‘naughty’ sense of humour.

    William also felt he could trust Kate – something incredibly important to him given his public profile.

    It is more than likely they would have got together anyway but their mutual friends – key bit-part players in the Royal romance and all present at the fashion show – concede that the dress stirred William’s interest and made him see the Berkshire-born beauty ‘in a different light’.

    Designer Charlotte, who later decided against a career in fashion and worked at Bristol aquarium, recalled: ‘I didn’t know who Kate Middleton was and I didn’t put her in it. It was just pure chance.

    ‘I made it as a skirt, but others pulled it up on Kate and she wore it as a dress. Maybe if it hadn’t been see-through, William might not have noticed her.’

    For years afterwards, the dress remained at the back of a wardrobe at Charlotte’s mother’s home. Charlotte said she realised its significance only when the couple announced their engagement in November 2010.

    The dress is a part of fashion history – the moment William could first have fallen in love with Kate – and that makes me really proud,’ she said. ‘That picture has been used so much over the years. I always wonder whether Kate is embarrassed about it, or liked it.’

    Kate had a place at Edinburgh University in 2000 but gave it up and took a gap year in Italy, reapplying to St Andrews for 2001 after William’s place became public.

    In Kate: The Future Queen, by Mail on Sunday Royal Editor Katie Nicholl, it claims Kate’s mum, Carole Middleton held a secret summit with William to ask whether he planned to propose to her daughter.

    Kate achieved two As and a B in her A Levels – the grades she needed for Edinburgh – and the university was her first choice. William achieved an A in geography, a B in history of art and a C in biology and won a place to study history of art after a year out.

    Applications to St Andrews rose by 44 per cent after the news emerged, meaning Kate’s decision was risky as there was no guarantee she would get a place.

    Jasper Selwyn, a careers adviser at Kate’s former school, Marlborough College, and house tutor Joan Gall both confirmed her first choice was Edinburgh.

    Mr Selwyn said: ‘Kate’s firm choice was Edinburgh and that was confirmed.’

    According to her house mistress, Ann Patching, the change of heart came as a surprise.

    She said: ‘After she left school, Catherine made some different decisions, but why she made those decisions I don’t know.’

    In 2007 William and Kate split amid rumours she disapproved of his party lifestyle and his reluctance to propose.

    A make-or-break holiday followed and Kate reportedly gave William an ultimatum. According to the book, the pair then made a pact to marry and have children.

    However in Christmas 2009 Kate’s mother, Carole Middleton, reportedly took William aside to discuss a possible engagement.

    A friend said: ‘She put some pressure on William to let the family know where it was all leading.

    William reassured her the relationship was very much on track and that there would be an engagement soon. Carole trusted William and put her faith in him.’

  • Meghan Markle on next mission after Prince William, King Charles determination to stop her.B

    Meghan Markle on next mission after Prince William, King Charles determination to stop her.B

    Meghan Markle on next mission after Prince William, King Charles determination to stop her

    Meghan Markle gives family update almost five years after admitting 'I’m not okay'
    King Charles appears to be fuming over Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s supposed royal takeover.

     

    Prince William struggles to handle ‘nightmare’ scenario for King Charles

    After the Duke and Duchess of Sussex visited Nigeria earlier last month in a ‘royal-like’ tour for a future Invictus Games, the monarch is said to be “angrier than anyone has ever seen him,” according to royal author Tom Quinn. However, what really infuriated that King was that Harry and Meghan were actually treated like royalty at the visit, Quinn explained to The Mirror.

    “What’s really upset the applecart is the fact that the Nigerians treated Meghan and Harry as if they too thought this was an official tour – all the signs were there as the couple were greeted with dances, receptions, visits to schools and charities,” he told the outlet. Quinn also added that Prince William is furious with the tour as it “confirmed the worst fears” to him and his father.

    “It’s as if Harry and Meghan have gone rogue – their Nigeria trip is a bold statement that they refuse to accept they are no longer working royals,” Quinn continued. He also alluded that the royals appear to be struggling to damage control. “William and Charles are scratching their heads and thinking, ‘How are we going to control this nightmare situation?’” he surmised.

  • Meghan Markle throwback photo she ‘never wanted the world to see’ released by family.B

    Meghan Markle throwback photo she ‘never wanted the world to see’ released by family.B

    New photos of Meghan Markle surfaced in a controversial Australian special in which her estranged family are to discuss their fractured relationship

    A throwback picture of Meghan Markle is thought to be an image she never wanted the world to see.

    The image was released by her estranged family ahead of a 7NEWS Australia special. The image in question shows the former Suits star, 41, smiling while looking over shoulder at an unknown event.

    The date of the throwback snap, which was shared on social media, was not revealed but she can be seen wearing a low-buttoned white collared shirt, while her hair was worn in a messy low bun. She appeared to have a napkin stuffed down her top in a bid to stop any slopping of the food dishes placed in front of her. The look divided users online as to whether it was a good idea or “lower class”.

    A new image showed Meghan enjoying an event while tucking into some food
    A new image showed Meghan enjoying an event while tucking into some food 
    Image:
    tauerbach/Twitter)

    The Markle family discuss their thoughts on her relationship with Prince Harry
    The Markle family discuss their thoughts on her relationship with Prince Harry 
    Image:
    ENT / SplashNews.com)
    Her beaming smile showed off her stunning pearly white teeth and the image was just one of many that the show focused on as her dad Thomas Markle, sister Samantha, and brother Thomas Jr sit down with the Aussie show.

    Taylor Auerbach of 7News Spotlight shared the snap ahead of the show and said it was one of “the photographs Meghan Markle NEVER wanted to world to see” on social media. The show documented the family life Meghan shared growing up. The family were ready to discuss her relationship with Prince Harry as well as where she would be “without her dad”.

    In the explosive trailer for the discussion, sister Samantha is heard saying: “She would still be a waitress if it wasn’t for dad,” she fumes. Discussing Meghan and Harry’s relationship, Samantha snapped: “They’re unhealthy for each other. This is a toxic relationship.” Half-brother Thomas Jr also said the family “won’t be going away” and urged Meghan to sit down with them to “change everything”.

    Meghan's estranged family are set to bare all
    Meghan’s estranged family are set to bare all 
    Image:
    Channel 7)DON’T MISS
    A number of other unseen snaps were featured in the controversial trailer, with a number of youthful pics being shown to the world. A lot of the images in question showed the Duchess seemingly enjoying her childhood, with one showing her early signs of a Royal future as she jokingly waved regally to the camera.

  • Meghan Markle reacts to the explosive secret about Archie’s paternity revealed by Matt Lauer (video)

    Meghan Markle reacts to the explosive secret about Archie’s paternity revealed by Matt Lauer (video)

    Meghan Markle reacts to the explosive secret about Archie’s paternity revealed by Matt Lauer (video)

     

    In a stunning revelation that has caused ripples throughout British tabloids and social media, former NBC anchor Matt Lauer dropped a bombshell regarding the paternity of Meghan Markle’s son, Archie, during a guest appearance on a popular YouTube channel dedicated to celebrity gossip (channel name withheld).

    While Lauer never explicitly stated that Archie wasn’t Prince Harry’s son, his carefully chosen words and knowing glances left viewers with a sense of unease.

    Referring to his own downfall due to sexual harassment allegations, Lauer pointed out the dangers of blindly trusting public figures and the media. He remarked, with a pointed finger at the camera, “The media has a way of portraying certain couples in a certain light. We’re all encouraged to believe a fairy tale narrative, but the truth can often be far more prosaic.”

     

    Lauer then mentioned a source close to the royal family who had shared explosive information regarding Archie’s paternity. Although the details of this supposed information were frustratingly vague, Lauer did mention discrepancies in the timeline of Meghan and Harry’s relationship compared to Archie’s birth.

    Social media erupted in speculation, with #ArchiePaternity trending worldwide. Countless memes and theories swirled around.

    While die-hard Meghan Markle fans dismissed Lauer’s claims as the desperate ramblings of a disgraced media personality, others pointed to Meghan’s noticeable absence from recent royal events as a possible sign that there’s more to the story than meets the eye.

    Throughout Lauer’s interview, one detail remained particularly unsettling: Meghan Markle’s complete silence on the matter. Despite the global firestorm surrounding her name, Meghan has yet to address the rumors swirling around Archie’s paternity.

    This silence, some argue, speaks volumes. Meghan Markle has never been shy about speaking her mind, from her outspoken nature on social issues to her controversial relationship with her own father. Her deafening silence on this topic is a stark departure from her usual outspokenness. By refusing to address the rumors, Meghan Markle only adds fuel to the fire. In the age of social media, silence can often be misconstrued as guilt or admission. Each passing day that Meghan stays silent allows the rumors to fester and grow.

    Some reporters argue that Meghan’s silence is a strategic move to protect her son from the media frenzy. There’s a certain logic to this argument; however, it’s important to remember that the longer Meghan stays silent, the more it appears she has something to hide.

    The truth remains unknown. Matt Lauer, despite his journalistic background, has a checkered past that makes his credibility questionable. However, the mere fact that a prominent media personality would make such a statement about a royal child ensures the rumor mill will continue to churn. One thing is certain: Meghan Markle’s silence is no longer an option. The longer she waits to address these explosive allegations, the more they will damage her carefully cultivated reputation.

    Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.

    Source: USA Today

     

  • HOT NEWS: Meghan’s biological mother happily announces, “My daughter has given birth to her third child, just like Prince Harry,” completely dispelling rumors of a fake pregnancy.

    HOT NEWS: Meghan’s biological mother happily announces, “My daughter has given birth to her third child, just like Prince Harry,” completely dispelling rumors of a fake pregnancy.

    Baby Sussex, Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, is here!

    Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, gave birth to Archie, a healthy baby boy weighing 7 pounds, 3 ounces on May 6, according to Buckingham Palace.

    “It’s magic. It’s pretty amazing,” she said, standing alongside Harry in Windsor Castle as he held their son making his public debut. “I have the two best guys in the world, so I’m really happy.”

    PHOTO: Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, during a photocall with their newborn son, in St George's Hall at Windsor Castle, Windsor, England, May 8, 2019.
    Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, during a photocall with their newborn son…Show more
    Dominic Lipinski/Pool via AP
    Here is everything we know so far about Harry and Meghan’s royal newborn son.

    When the baby was born
    Duchess Meghan gave birth on Monday, May 6, at 5:26 a.m. local time, according to Buckingham Palace.

    What the baby is named
    Harry and Meghan took to Instagram to reveal the name of their son: Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor.

    They revealed Archie’s name alongside a photo of the couple introducing their newborn to his great-grandparents, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip. Also in the photo is Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland.

    The baby will not carry a courtesy title “at this time,” according to Buckingham Palace.

    Archie’s surname of Mountbatten-Windsor is a combination of Queen Elizabeth’s surname of Windsor and Prince Philip’s adopted surname of Mountbatten.

    PHOTO: A copy of the birth certificate of Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, son of Britain's Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, in London, Friday May 17, 2019.
    A copy of the birth certificate for Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, was shared with the public on May 17. Portland Hospital in Westminster was listed as Archie’ place of birth.

    PHOTO: A copy of the birth certificate of Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, son of Britain’s Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, in London, Friday May 17, 2019.
    A copy of the birth certificate of Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, son of Britain’s Pr…Show more
    Jonathan Brady/PA via AP
    Some royal watchers on social media noted that Meghan’s occupation was listed as “Princess of the United Kingdom.”

    PHOTO: Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex are seen with their baby son, who was born on Monday morning, during a photocall in St George's Hall at Windsor Castle, England, May 8, 2019.
    The Duchess of Sussex gave birth at the Portland Hospital, a private hospital in London.

    The palace said in a statement that Meghan went into labor “in the early hours of this morning” with Prince Harry by her side.

    PHOTO: Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex are seen with their baby son, who was born on Monday morning, during a photocall in St George’s Hall at Windsor Castle, England, May 8, 2019.
    Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex are seen with their baby son, who was bor…Show more
    Dominic Lipinski/Pool/Reuters
    The birth announcement issued by Buckingham Palace indicated Meghan and Harry were at home at Frogmore Cottage along with Meghan’s mom, Doria Ragland, just a few hours after the birth.

    How the baby’s birth was announced
    Buckingham Palace alerted members of the media that Duchess Meghan was in labor and then that she had given birth.

    Harry and Meghan’s Instagram account also shared the news via a post announcing the couple had a baby boy.

    Prince Harry also stepped out near Frogmore Cottage to personally share the news of his son’s birth, calling the birth “amazing” and “absolutely incredible.”

    Later in the day, a framed notice of birth for Harry and Meghan’s son went on display on a ceremonial easel at the gates of Buckingham Palace.

    PHOTO: Members of staff set up an official notice on an easel at the gates of Buckingham Palace in London on May 6, 2019 announcing the birth of a son to Britain’s Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.
    Members of staff set up an official notice on an easel at the gates of Buckingham Palace i…Show more
    Tolga Akmen/AFP/Getty Images
    Who was present for the birth
    Prince Harry was by Meghan’s side for the birth of their first child, according to Buckingham Palace.

    Meghan’s mom is also with the family of three at Frogmore Cottage.

    When the baby made his public debut
    Baby Sussex was introduced to the world on Wednesday at Windsor Castle in a photo call with his parents, Harry and Meghan.

    PHOTO:Prince Harry and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, pose for a photo with their newborn baby son in St George’s Hall at Windsor Castle in Windsor, England, May 8, 2019.
    Prince Harry and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, pose for a photo with their newbo…Show more
    Dominic Lipinski/Pool/AFP/Getty Images
    “Parenting is amazing,” Harry said. “It’s only been, what, two-and-a-half days, three days? But we’re just so thrilled to have our own little bundle of joy here to spend some precious times with him as he slowly starts to grow up.”

    The royal baby wore a cashmere hat by G.H. Hurt & Son and was bundled in an ivory white Leaves and Flowers Baby Shawl by the same brand. Meghan wore a sleeveless trench dress by Grace Wales Bonner.

    The interview with the family of three took place inside St. George’s Hall at Windsor Castle, the same place Harry and Meghan held their wedding reception after their May 19 wedding.

    Harry and Meghan’s decision to skip the traditional photo op outside the hospital, like Princess Diana and Duchess Kate have done, drew backlash from some members of the British press when it was first announced last month.

    “This is the shattering of a tradition that goes back for decades,” one journalist told The New York Times last month. “There is a price to be paid for that, and that price is mockery.”

    On Wednesday, Meghan said they had a “special couple days” as a family of three.

    PHOTO: Members of staff set up an official notice on an easel at the gates of Buckingham Palace in London on May 6, 2019 announcing the birth of a son to Britain's Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

    “He’s just been the dream, so it’s been a special couple days,” she said, later thanking the public for “all the well wishes and the kindness.”

    How the baby made history
    Prince Harry and Meghan’s son is the first American British biracial royal born in the United Kingdom.

    Baby Sussex appears to be the first mixed race child born into the royal family, although some royal historians have pointed out that when Queen Charlotte married King George III in the 1700s, she was believed to have descended from the black branch of the Portuguese royal family. The couple had 15 children, according to the British royal family’s website.

    Meghan was born to a white father and a black mother and grew up as a biracial child in Los Angeles.

    Harry and Meghan’s child could hold dual American and British nationality, a first for a royal baby.

    Meghan, a California native, is reportedly still waiting for her British citizenship application to be approved. Kensington Palace said in November that Meghan would retain her U.S. citizenship as she undergoes the process of becoming a British citizen, which can take several years.

    “From what I understand, Harry and Meghan will have to acquire documentation for their child to prove U.S. citizenship and it’s not clear if they will do that but of course the option is there,” said ABC News royal contributor Victoria Murphy.

    Where the baby falls in the line of succession
    Harry and Meghan’s son is seventh in line to the British throne, after its grandfather, Prince Charles, uncle, Prince William, three cousins, George, Charlotte and Louis and its father, Prince Harry.

    What leave Meghan, Harry will take after the baby is born
    The palace has not announced maternity and paternity leave plans for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

  • ITV Love Island’s Gemma Owen became ‘protective’ after brother was diagnosed with rare eye disease

    ITV Love Island’s Gemma Owen became ‘protective’ after brother was diagnosed with rare eye disease

     

    Love Island’s Gemma Owen and her little brother James appeared on Loose Women to discuss his blindness. He was diagnosed with Stargardt disease when he was younger

    Love Island’s Gemma Owen revealed she became ‘protective’ over her brother James after he was diagnosed with a rare eye disease.

    A few years ago, footballer Michael Owen confirmed his son was diagnosed with Stargardt disease – which, according to the NHS, is a “rare inherited condition causing loss of central vision”. According to the National Eye Institute, vision loss usually starts in childhood — but some people with Stargardt disease don’t start to lose their vision until they’re adults.

    James first realised something was wrong when he struggled to see the whiteboard at school. Appearing on Monday’s edition of Loose Women, Gemma and her brother discussed what it was like for him growing up and how the family navigated the difficult diagnosis.

    Gemma said: “I think at the start it was it was a little bit of a struggle, you know, for the family and for James. I think he had quite a few of his early school years, you know, being quite frustrated and finding work challenging but I think he’s sort of really sort of got the grips with it and embracing it now.”

    Gemma Owen
    Gemma became ‘protective’ over her little brother 
    Image:
    ITV)

    When asked whether she felt protective, Gemma added: “I am the protective big sister and seeing his mates sort of having fun and games with him a little bit, I did get protective sometimes.” Their mum, Louise, was in the audience and admitted she didn’t cope very well with the diagnosis.

    “To begin with, my husband’s [Michael Owen] very optimistic. The glass is half always half full,” she explained. “But for me, the thought of there not being any treatment at the moment or any cure was quite hard to deal with and also knowing that progressively the condition was going to get worse.”

    Gemma said she had to step in as support as her mum wasn’t ‘strong’ about the situation. “I think my mum as any mum would be, I think she found it very emotional. And she, you know, when James came back from school and had a bad day. I think she just got upset. She got emotional and she wasn’t really, you know, that strong sort of figure.

    “So that’s where I sort of tried my best to step in and sort of be there for him and sort of, you know, look at everything logically and try and work through it.”

    In 2019, former footballer Michael opened up about his son’ condition during a chat with The Times. He said: “He will never be a footballer. My son’s got an eye condition. I’ve never said this. I don’t want a big headline. Clinically, he’s blind. He’s got Stargardt disease, a degeneration of his retina. I used to go and watch him and b*****k him about his positioning.”

    “He can’t see the ball until it’s five yards away. As much as every father wants their son to play, it is almost a relief to me,” he added at the time.

  • Ruth Langsford on sensational return to This Morning after Eamonn Holmes’ bitter feud with ITV

    Ruth Langsford on sensational return to This Morning after Eamonn Holmes’ bitter feud with ITV

    Loose Women’s Ruth Langsford doesn’t need Eamonn Holmes’ ‘permission to do anything’, including returning to ITV show This Morning without her husband by her side

    Ruth Langsford says she could return to This Morning and wouldn’t need husband Eamonn Holmes’ permission.

    The pair used to host the show every Friday for 15 years but were axed leading to Eamonn criticising the ITV show repeatedly in the media. He also didn’t hold back in his criticism of Phillip Schofield and how his exit was handled. But by contrast Ruth returned for a week on This Morning with Rylan Clark and recent reports even said she was in talks for a full time comeback.

    Speaking in Woman&Home, Ruth said: “I love This Morning but reports that ITV have recently asked me back aren’t true. I laughed when I saw that report. I have no idea where these things come from. It’s like when people write a nasty comment on my Instagram, I find it amusing.

    Ruth and Eamonn on this morning
    The Loose Women star doesn’t need to ask her husband ‘permission to do anything’ 
    Image:
    ITV)
    “If they asked me, I would certainly consider it. I did a week with Rylan last year and I wasn’t torn because of Eamonn’s situation [turning his back on ITV]. Eamonn has left ITV, it’s done and dusted. He’s got another job, which he loves. Also, I don’t have to ask Eamonn’s permission to do anything, or for him me, so if ITV said, ‘Would you come and do a week on This Morning?’ and if I was free and it was with the right person, I probably would do it.”

    In the interview for the December issues of the magazine, which features a Christmas theme, Ruth also says she would love a Sunday night chat show. Discussing her ambitions, she said: “Do I want a prime-time Sunday night chat show? Of course! I’m always ambitious. I’m not chasing jobs but I set my own standards. I want my clothing range to do well; I put the hours in, I do my research, I have a good team, I turn up on time and work hard. I’m very much a team player. I’m not a leader, but I like bouncing ideas.

    “In television, age is not always a positive [for a woman]. Loose Women is fantastic and thank God for it, but often your age can be a negative in TV. You are at the mercy of programme controllers. You can have the best agent in the world and be – in your opinion – the best presenter ever, but if the person at the top of the chain doesn’t want to use you, you don’t get used.”

    She also spoke about trying to “embrace ageing”. The 63-year-old explained: I’m trying to embrace ageing and not let it frighten me. You can become too cautious and think, ‘Ooh, I’d better not do that because of my age.’ I’m not suddenly going to go skydiving, I’m just trying to embrace the life I have.

    “I love working but the older I get, the longer hours take more of a toll, so I try to balance that by eating well, walking and getting fresh air. I’m 63, pretty fit and healthy, but I look at my mum, then I look at Eamonn, who’s had his health and back problems, and it makes you realise how important your health is, being able to move is and looking after yourself.”

    Eamonn Holmes on GB News
    Eamonn has let rip on ITV several times since leaving the channel
    Ruth’s husband Eamonn hasn’t been shy sharing his thoughts on on ITV and his former colleagues since leaving the channel in 2021 – taking aim at This Morning’s press office and the ITV show’s former host Schofield.

    Eamonn, 62, co-hosted the Friday instalment of This Morning for 15 years with Ruth, 61, before they were replaced on the ITV show by Alison Hammond and Dermot O’Leary. Eamonn has since gone to to join GB News, presenting the channel’s breakfast show alongside co-host Isabel Webster.

    The Irish journalist branded the ITV press office ‘Ministry of Lies’ in July 2022, after scooping his first major award since making the switch from ITV to GB News. During his acceptance speech at the Tric Awards, Eamonn gave a warning to Good Morning Britain – telling the ITV show he and GB News were “coming for them” in the ratings war.

    Eamonn beat Stephen Dixon, Victoria Derbyshire and Clive Myrie to win the New Presenter honour at the Tric Awards last year and celebrated his success and set the record straight about a few things regarding his ITV exit when chatting with the Mirror and other press after collecting his award.

    “You wouldn’t be doing what you’re doing if you don’t think you’re the best with what you’re doing,” Eamonn stated when quizzed about his ratings war promise to Good Morning Britain. When probed about how wife Ruth feels about his previous comments regarding ITV following his exit, Eamonn was quick to share how he really feels.

    “I haven’t been slagging off This Morning. I’m telling the truth about ITV,” he hit back with when asked how Ruth feels about him “slagging off ITV.” “I haven’t been slagging them off. ITV have been telling lies about me. They’ve been telling lies about me. I’m just putting the record straight, he continued.Eamonn didn’t stop there, going on to declare: “The Ministry of Lies, their press office, which chunder out there the same. The point is I did not resign from ITV. ITV resigned from me. And I never received a single explanation once why they wanted rid of me. And also, the sort of stuff that comes out – ‘Eamonn believes he’s male pale and stale,’ doesn’t look like it does it. Eamonn never once said that. ITV press office said that.”

  • ITV’s Loose Women star Kaye Adams forced to apologise as Linda Robson swears on live TV

    ITV’s Loose Women star Kaye Adams forced to apologise as Linda Robson swears on live TV

    ITV’s Loose Women presenter Kaye Adams was forced to apologise to viewers after Linda Robson swore on live TV as she tried to explain that she is not confident in taking red carpet pictures

    Loose Women panelist Kaye Adams was forced to apologise to viewers after Linda Robson swore on live TV as she tried to explain how she doesn’t take herself seriously when taking red-carpet pictures.

    The 65 year old star, who became a household name when she starred in the comedy Birds Of A Feather, was explaining to the audience there are specific poses to master when having your picture taken on the red carpet. She told fans that you have to pose with your head forward and to not look down “otherwise you get a double chin.” She then continued to say: “I just go like that.”

    Loose Women's Kaye Adams apologises to viewers over Linda Robson swearing
    Loose Women’s Kaye Adams apologises to viewers over Linda Robson swearing 
    Image:
    ITV)

    And just moments later she flipped the bird – holding her middle finger up in a swearing hand gesture – and said: “I just try and make it a joke because I don’t know what else to do.” Within seconds, Kaye stepped in and spoke to the camera to apologise to viewers who may have found Linda’s gesture offensive.

    She told fans: “Can I just say, some people might find that gesture offensive and so we apologise.” To hide her embarrassment, Linda laughed off the situation while Kaye swiftly moved on.

    The Scottish TV presenter then attributed Linda’s inability to take a posed photograph, down to her carrying a pair of flip-flops under her arm in a plastic bag. Kaye added: “So that kind of spoils the whole vibe a wee bit doesn’t it?” But Linda claimed “normally I get someone to hold it for me when I’m doing the red carpet.” This however, is not the first time that Linda has let a rude word slip while on the live ITV daytime show.

    Linda Robson is a regular guest on the daytime TV show
    Linda Robson is a regular guest on the daytime TV show 
    Image:
    Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

    Last month, Linda’s blunder came during a segment of the show where she was giving away a rather large cash prize, dressed as an old woman and named Nanny Linda. But, as she wheeled out the £1million cash prize to introduce the competition, she accidentally dropped the F-word live on air. And host Charlene White had to step in and apologise. She said: “I would like to apologise for Linda’s language.” But presenter Brenda Edwards, who always tries to maintain her composure, was still left in shock as she held her hand to her mouth for a few seconds.

    Usually, viewers pen their disapproval on social media but it looks as though the much loved star of the ITV daytime show, 65, instead made viewers chuckle. One wrote on Twitter: “Another cracker of a show today on @loosewomen. Always great when Jane McDonald makes an appearance, Linda Robson swearing with @RealDeniseWelch almost caught out.” Another commented: “Linda robson swearing on loose women has just made my day.” And a third took to the social media platform and said: “Haha!!! Linda Robson dropping the F-BOMB live on air!”

  • Katie Price launches tirade at ITV’s Loose Women and ‘disrespectful’ ex co-stars

    Katie Price launches tirade at ITV’s Loose Women and ‘disrespectful’ ex co-stars

    Katie Price has hit out at her former Loose Women colleagues who left her annoyed by not asking a question about her when one of her children appeared on the show

    Katie Price has slammed her former Loose Women co-stars who recently failed to acknowledge her.

    The former glamour model appeared on the programme between 2015 and 2018 as a panellist, sitting at the famous desk for a total of 133 episodes and even attempting to relaunch her short-lived music career on the show. However, Katie hasn’t appeared on the programme since and has not been mentioned by her former co-stars.

    Recently, her son Junior, 18, appeared on the ITV programme to discuss his upbringing with famous parents, Katie and Peter Andre as well as his music career as he attempts to make a name for himself. But his stint left his mum infuriated.

    Speaking on The Katie Price Show podcast, her younger sister Sophie asked if Katie would ever consider returning. “I’m gonna throw it back, the question is would they ever have me back on?” she responded.

    Katie Price has ruled out returning to Loose Women
    Katie Price has ruled out returning to Loose Women 
    Image:
    Instagram)

    Katie was a regular on the show between 2015 and 2018
    Katie was a regular on the show between 2015 and 2018 
    Image:
    ITV)

    The mum-of-five added: “Although they did p**s me off when Junior was on it, not even asking a question, ‘how is your mum’ and all of that – very disrespectful. But, would I be a presenter on it? To be honest, I’ve been there and done that so probably not, no I don’t want to be a presenter on Loose Women again, so I would turn that down.”

    But this isn’t Katie’s first time criticising her former pals after her decision to quit for “personal reasons”. Taking to TikTok, she claimed that the panellists “hated” her. Following Junior’s interview,s he told fans: “Isn’t it weird I was in Big Brother with Nadia, I presented with all the other ones on Loose Women.” She explained: “Not one mention about his mum, not one mention about ‘is your mum proud of you? It was all Pete, Pete, Pete, Pete, Pete. He was obviously told not to talk about me. It is so cruel. But that’s what this industry is like!”

    Katie went on to recall: “I had to just confess to everyone how on Loose Women they didn’t even mention me considering I worked with them. I said I am in his life I do see him and I do speak to him and we all do. But our whole family our left out of everything because they hate me.”

    Although she has remained tight-lipped about her exit, she previously claimed that the programme made her “feel sick” and claimed bosses and producers had expected her to “perform like a seal”. Looking back at her time on the ITV lunchtime show, she believed that she looked “dead” behind the eyes as her personal life had started to unravel during her stint. “All the drama came out,” she told Annie Macmanus.

  • Stacey Solomon’s return to ITV Loose Women confirmed after exit fears – and it’s soon

    Stacey Solomon’s return to ITV Loose Women confirmed after exit fears – and it’s soon

    Loose Women have confirmed when Stacey Solomon will make a huge return to the ITV lunchtime show amid fears she was no longer a pannellist

    Stacey Solomon’s return to Loose Women has been confirmed – and it’s just days away.

    There had been fears Stacey had quit the ITV lunchtime show after taking some time off for maternity leave, and it’s now been confirmed when she’ll be back with the panel for the hit programme. Stacey joined Loose Women back in 2016 and has been on-off since, appearing more regularly at the start before only making occasional appearances in the past year or so.

    A source said recently that Stacey had “outgrown” the show and would not be returning. “The panellists know Stacey is popular and good for the programme, so they would be gutted to see her go,” they said, ” She’s outgrown the show. It’s no longer right for Stacey. Loose Women takes up a lot of her time. If she were to leave, it would free her time up a little, especially if she has to be away for longer periods of time with her own shows.” However, sources confirmed to The Miror that wasn’t the case.

    Stacey is set to update the Loose Women on her family life
    Stacey is set to update the Loose Women on her family life 
    Image:
    staceysolomon/Instagram)
    An insider close to Stacey exclusively told The Mirror that claims she had parted ways with ITV were “categorically untrue”. A spokesperson for the show added: “These claims are not true. We are looking forward to welcoming Stacey back onto the show soon.”

    Now, it’s been confirmed that Stacey will be back on the panel tomorrow to fill the other Loose Women in on what life has been like since she went on maternity leave, following the arrival of her latest child, daughter Belle.

    She will be back on Loose Women tomorrow
    She will be back on Loose Women tomorrow 
    Image:
    Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock

    Speaking about her time on Loose Women so far, Stacey revealed previously: “Again, I’m just grateful to be on there. When I was on X Factor 14 years ago… I never even thought I’d be on a show like this never mind have opportunities like Sort Your Life Out and Loose Women. So every time I get to do something like that I’m genuinely like ‘thank goodness, this is amazing!’. You’ve just got to keep enjoying it because you never know when it’ll be gone and when those things aren’t going to be there.”

    Stacey will be back on Loose Women tomorrow with her fellow panellists, where she’s likely to discuss family life, her home Pickle Cottage and of course, her relationship with I’m A Celebrity star Joe Swash.