While Archie and Lilibet are still very young, the two royal children have already been a staple of discussion among news outlets. Lilibet recently celebrated her third birthday, though unfortunately no members of the Royal Family were present for her party. Just what Archie and Lilibet’s relationships with their UK-based cousins – Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis – will look like in the future remains a matter for debate, though it’s been rumored recently that King Charles is desperate to play a more active role in the Sussexes’s children’s lives.Archie is set to begin kindergarten this fall, while Lilibet is getting ready for preschool. Harry and Meghan are said to have started looking at schools for their children, only for one US journalist to lash out at the couple, labeling them “frauds.”

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle moved to the US to live a more private life, far away from the paparazzi press and the pressures and expectations of the monarchy. It’s been said that the couple knew “within” days of their wedding that they didn’t want to stay in the Firm long-term.

When Archie was born in 2019, the Sussexes had already taken a step towards becoming more private, vying to move away from being wheeled out as a “marionette puppet” by the Crown for fans and media worldwide.

Harry & Meghan ‘tricked” reports when Archie was born

In her book The New Royals: Queen Elizabeth’s Legacy and the Future of the Crown, royal expert Katie Nicholl described Harry as “almost morbidly obsessed” with keeping Archie’s birth as secret as possible, which certainly isn’t the norm when it comes to royal babies being born.

Yet as millions of loyal fans and the majority of the public sought information about the little boy, Harry and Meghan’s desire for secrecy was ignored, instead dubbed part of the “unwritten contract between the royals and the public.”

“Behind the scenes, matters were so fraught that more than one official — as I know from personal experience — was reduced to tears of frustration and despair,” Rebecca English, royal editor of the Daily Mail, added.

Usually, when a royal baby is born, the parents find themselves on the hospital steps with their new son or daughter to pose before the media. After photographs are taken, the proud mother and father answer a few questions before retreating to privacy.

According to Katie Nicholl, Harry and Meghan wanted to approach Archie’s birth differently. Instead of facing the media openly, they tricked reporters and photographers.

Prince William, Prince Harry, and William’s children, Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis, were all born at St Mary’s Hospital; thus, the traditional first baby photos were taken there. However, Meghan’s doctor worked at Portland Hospital, so it made sense for Meghan to deliver Archie there.

Prince Archie & Princess Lilibet

An added bonus for the Sussexes was that the place would make photos impossible due to safety considerations around the entrance.

“Harry had always enjoyed outfoxing the media,” Nicholl wrote in The New Royals: Queen Elizabeth’s Legacy and the Future of the Crown.

“He and Meghan were thrilled to be safely delivered of their son in London’s private Portland hospital even before the palace press office had confirmed the duchess was in labor.”

Lilibet’s birth was not quite the same. She was born in June 2021 in California, and there, no paparazzi press even got close. Even so, it wasn’t long before Harry and Meghan Markle brought their kids back into the spotlight.

Two years after Lilibet’s birth, the Sussees announced that they had given their children the respective titles of prince and princess. Yet while Harry and Meghan claim the titles are their children’s birthright, not everyone agreed that this was the best move.

According to royal expert and author Angela Levin, it could have an unwanted impact on Archie and Lilibet’s futures.

In a piece for Sky, Levin stated that Lilibet now has a significant burden on her shoulders due to her parents’ decision.

“It will take a long time for little Lilibet to realize the extent of the burden her parents have placed on her young shoulders,” Levin said at the time.

She added that by giving their daughter an official royal title, Harry and Meghan have now “glued her to the British Royal Family,” the same establishment they have criticized for many years.

“Why on earth would you want your daughter to experience such anguish?” Levin asked, stating that Lilibet’s everyday life will be more challenging since she’s has the title of princess attached to her name.

King Charles ‘desperate’ to meet Archie & Lilibet

“Little girls obviously love being a princess at parties, but if Lilibet is the only one in the class who is a real princess, it could lead to jealousy that could easily be avoided,” the royal expert concluded.

Needless to say, Archie and Lilibet are growing up fast. Archie celebrated his 5th birthday in May; Lilibet turned three a little over a week ago. On June 5, the young princess’s big day was marked with a party, though no members of her family of the royal side was in attendance. In fact, it’s understood that Princess Eugenie is the only royal who has made a trip to visit Harry, Meghan, and their children in California.

Interestingly, while King Charles’s ties to Harry and his daughter-in-law remain strained, he is reportedly “heartbroken” about the non-existent relationship he shares with Archie and Lilibet.

Loose Women fans were left divided as they watched the panel interview Jonathan Meijer, the sperm donor at the centre of a shocking new Netflix docuseries The Man with 1000 kids

Loose Women viewers were left fuming after an interview with sperm donor Jonathan Meije descended into chaos on the show.

Kaye Adams, Katie Piper, Linda Robson and Jane Moore formed the panel this Friday (July 26) and dived into a range of hot topics before inviting Jonathan for a virtual sit-down.

The Dutch sperm donor, who has been embroiled in controversy for fathering over 500 children and allegedly duping families, joined the conversation to shed light on his side of the story.

Despite the title, The Man with 1000 Kids, which hit Netflix earlier this month, Jonathan claims his progeny tally stands at 550, not the thousand as suggested by the series.

Loose Women viewers were left fuming after an interview with sperm donor Jonathan Meije descended into chaos on the show ( 
Image:
(Image: ITV))

However, the interview took a turn for the worse as Jonathan repeatedly talked over the panellists, leading to visible frustration during their probe into the contentious documentary, reports the Express.

As the episode unfolded, disgruntled fans didn’t hesitate to express their outrage online. One viewer blasted the segment on X, formerly known as Twitter, writing: “Nah Loose Women, this is the worst interview I’ve ever seen. All four women don’t know how to interview. How can you ask a sperm doner why he doesn’t take care of his kids #loosewomen”.

Another viewer chimed in: “Am I missing something? Surely he only donated to women who had requested donation? #loosewomen.”

The four women spoke to Jonathan about claims made about him in the Netflix series ( 
Image:
ITV)
A third person criticised the show, tweeting: “The @loosewomen interview with the Dutch sperm donor was terrible. They almost condemned this man for helping 550 women have children. And said he’s a ‘dad without the responsibilities’? What a joke. If nobody wanted to be a donor. Men would be the bad guys. #loosewomen”.

Jonathan previously said that he voluntarily stopped donating sperm to new recipients back in 2019. He made this decision partly because he wants to concentrate on having his own kids.

Jonathan has been embroiled in controversy for fathering over 500 children ( 
Image:
ITVFast forward four years, and a Dutch court ordered him to cease donating sperm, destroy any stored by clinics, and reportedly slapped him with a €100,000 fine for any future violation, although it does allow for mothers who want biological siblings for their donor children.Meijer declined to participate in The Man with 1000 Kids as he believes it’s not in the best interest of the donor children. “I think it’s really capitalising on these families, who were infertile or just wanted to have families,” he says.

“They’re good people, lovely people, and now people will ask them: ‘Oh, is your child one from the 1,000 donor doc? ‘ Is the doc going to do any good for the children? ‘.”

 

Shocking Allegations Surrounding Lilibet Diana’s Birth Unveiled

In a moment of celebration and joy in June 2021, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, shared the exciting news of the birth of their second child, Lilibet Diana.

The world was filled with happiness upon hearing this news, but little did they know that a storm of controversy was about to unfold.

Recent reports have surfaced, suggesting that the circumstances surrounding Lilibet’s birth may not be as straightforward as initially portrayed.

It is alleged that Lilibet was born through a surrogate couple identified as John and Jane Doe, who are American citizens of Hispanic descent, at a private clinic in Los Angeles.

Shockingly, it is claimed that the surrogate couple was paid an exorbitant sum of $1.5 million for their services.

The situation takes a dramatic turn as the surrogate couple, now known as John and Jane Doe, have decided to challenge the intended arrangement and are seeking custody of baby Lilibet.

This unexpected development has led to a legal battle between the surrogate couple and Harry and Meghan, leaving many questioning the integrity of the royal couple, the role of the media, and the potential repercussions on their relationship with the royal family.

In response to the legal dispute, the surrogate couple, represented by legal counsel, has taken legal action against Harry and Meghan, alleging deception regarding the identity of the intended parents and their intentions for the child.

They claim that they were unaware they were carrying a child for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and are now fighting to retain custody of Lilibet.

The unfolding legal battle has left both Harry and Meghan distressed as they navigate through a contentious dispute that threatens to overshadow the joyous occasion of their daughter’s birth.

Despite the escalating situation, the couple has chosen to remain silent publicly, contemplating potential legal action against the media outlet responsible for releasing the report, citing defamation.

Reports indicate that Harry and Meghan turned to surrogacy following Meghan’s previous miscarriage, working closely with a reputable surrogacy agency to ensure all contractual agreements were upheld.

Their decision to pursue surrogacy stemmed from a desire to expand their family while prioritizing the privacy and well-being of the surrogate mother.

The controversy surrounding Lilibet’s birth has sparked widespread debate, raising questions about the implications for Harry and Meghan’s ties with the royal family.

Since stepping back from their senior roles within the British royal family, the couple has been forging a new path, aiming to establish their independence and redefine their public image.

In the midst of heightened media scrutiny, some critics have accused Harry and Meghan of orchestrating a misleading narrative surrounding Lilibet’s birth, further intensifying the ongoing debate about the boundaries between public and private life for public figures.

The latest allegations have reignited discussions about the influence of media narratives on personal lives and the challenges faced by individuals in the public eye.

As the public remains captivated by the unfolding legal battle and revelations surrounding Lilibet Diana’s birth, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle find themselves grappling with the potential repercussions of this controversy, both personally and in terms of their relationship with the royal family.

The outcome of this distressing situation is poised to shape the narrative surrounding Harry and Meghan’s lives and may prompt a broader conversation about the rights and privacy of individuals thrust into the spotlight.

Ex This Morning presenters Ruth Langsford and Eamonn Holmes announced their split back in May after 14 years of marriage

Ruth Langsford previously got candid about the ups and downs of working with her now estranged husband Eamonn Holmes. The pair, who announced their separation in May, were the faces of ITV’s This Morning for 15 years before Eamonn moved onto GB News.

After his exit, Ruth continued her roles on Loose Women and QVC. At the time when she was still co-hosting with Eamonn, Ruth revealed why it was “exciting but dangerous” to work with her husband.

She said: “He’s quite exciting to work with but also dangerous but, [why] I think we compliment each other in that way, is that he is kind of a maverick and he flies by the seat of his pants. You’re never sure where he’s going with something. I’ll start to read something and he’ll read it, where it says my name.

“He doesn’t stick to anything and I quite like that as I tend to be safer. But also, I rein him in sometimes, sometimes he needs reining in.

 

CCTV footage shows cat mauled by ‘XL Bully and Pitbull’

“We’re like Yin and Yang really, we feed off each other, we both bring different qualities and skills and personality to the same job.”

On Kate Thornton’s White Wine Question Time podcast, she further described co-presenting as “really difficult”, reports the Express.

“It’s a lovely experience,” she explained. “But, it can be challenging because you’ve got to let that other person in, they might take an interview in a way that you weren’t going to take it.

Eamonn Holmes and Ruth Langsford split after 14 years of marriage ( 
Image:
(Image: GETTY))
“And, I’ve seen that with Eamonn so many times, because really, he prefers to work alone.”

In addition to This Morning, the duo have co-hosted the Channel 5 shows Do the Right Thing and Eamonn and Ruth: How the Other Half Lives over the years.

Their on-screen collaboration has given viewers a glimpse into their seemingly strong relationship, which came to an end in May.

Ruth is yet to comment on their split, but Eamonn has expressed his gratitude to fans for their support live on his GB News show.

When The Mirror recently asked him about their break-up, he said: “I’m not okay. This is not a good time at all.”

On whether they could remain friends after their split, he added: “It’s too early to say, but I hope we can still be friends.”

After taking an extended break following their break-up, Ruth returned to Loose Women earlier this week, still wearing her wedding ring.

Body language expert Darren Stanton believes the presenter may be waiting until their divorce is finalised before she removes it.

After photos of Ruth smiling surfaced shortly after the news, he commented: “It’s almost like the last remnants of the relationship.

“I think the smile is more of a masking smile, as we know, the most faked emotion is happiness and joy – which sometimes masks nerves.”

Prince Harry Fears He’ll Never See King Charles Alive Again: Report

 

Prince Harry fears that William and the royal firm will never let him see King Charles again. Perhaps not even at the monarch’s funeral. Kin…

Prince Harry fears that William and the royal firm will never let him see King Charles again.

Perhaps not even at the monarch’s funeral.

King Charles returned to his royal duties in April following cancer treatments. Though many details remain under wraps, whispers suggest that the monarch’s outlook looks grim.

King Charles is snubbing Prince Harry again and again

On May 7, Buckingham Palace announced to the world that King Charles plans to endow Prince William with a prestigious (within the context of honorary and frankly pretend royal honors) military title.

“His Majesty the King will officially hand over the role of Colonel-in-Chief of the Army Air Corps to His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales,” the place decreed. William assumed the title of Prince of Wales when his father ascended to the throne upon Queen Elizabeth II’s death.

 

While “these are my awards, from Army” is fairly par for the course when it comes to the royal family and their titles, there’s one glaring detail. There is someone in line for the throne who actually served in the British military, and it was not William. 

Prince Harry served with distinction

Harry served with the Army Air Corps in Afghanistan. This was not a ceremonial title or a special big boy pin on his chest, but actual normal military service as part of a multinational coalition to combat the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

This title might very well have gone to Harry one day if he and Meghan Markle had not had to step away from royal duties in 2020 in order to protect their family.

According to what an inside source tells In Touch Weekly, “For Harry, it was the ultimate humiliation” for his brother to receive this title.

This was not the only insult to Prince Harry from his royal father

Mere hours ahead of King Charles awarding that title to William, Prince Harry had arrived in London.

His purpose was to mark the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games. This sports event exists for wounded soldiers and veterans, and is part of Prince Harry’s legacy.

However, King Charles was supposedly too busy to see Harry during his visit. That would be awkward under any circumstances. With Charles’ cancer battle, it seems downright cruel.

“It’s not stopped him from loving his dad,” the inside source explained. “But has reminded Harry that some things may never be repairable.”

And with reports that King Charles has pancreatic cancer and an estimated two years to live, time is running out to even try to mend fences.

Understandably, the insider added: “Harry is heartbroken and worried he’ll never see his father again.”

Will Harry ever see Charles again?

Though Charles had previously wanted Harry and William to make amends, reports say that Charles is now the one causing problems and preventing reconciliation.

The reason? Charles is still royally peeved that Harry described his lived experiences in his bestselling memoir, Spare. Particularly sharing his recollections of Camilla, who is now Charles’ queen.

However, ultimately, the ball may be in William’s court. Elizabeth II wasn’t the one who prevented Harry from seeing her on her deathbed. And when it’s Charles’ turn, it’s likely that William will be calling the shots. Either way, by that point, it will be too late.

Harry would like nothing more than to see his dad, but he’s been shut out,” the inside source affirmed of Charles avoiding Harry during his latest visit. “They’re punishing him.” Ouch!

“If his father dies and Harry doesn’t get a chance to see him, it will be another trauma to add to an already long list,” the insider warned. “But it’s naïve of Harry to think Charles will come around and broker reconciliation.”

Then there are reports that William is thinking about money — and wanting to ensure that Harry inherits none of Charles’ royal riches. Family tragedy can bring out the worst in some people.

Stacey Solomon has taken to Instagram to share her family’s adorable Sunday morning antics, telling fans that husband Joe Swash is “trying” to get her pregnant

Stacey Solomon has hinted that she might be ready to expand her brood after watching her husband Joe Swash’s playful antics with their children.

The Loose Women presenter, who is already a mum of five, regularly shares snippets of her idyllic family life at Pickle Cottage with her six million Instagram followers. Stacey and Joe, who tied the knot in 2022, are parents to Rex, four, Rose, two, and one year old Belle.

Stacey also has sons Leighton, 12, and Zachary, 16, from previous relationships, while Joe has a son Harry, 16, with his ex-partner Emma Sophocleous. However, it seems the couple may be considering adding another member to their adorable clan. In a recent Instagram post, Stacey shared a video of Joe amusing their three youngest kids by chasing them around their beautiful patio with a pool cleaner.

Stacey Solomon shared an adorable video of husband Joe Swash playing with their kids ( 
Image:
No credit)

Stacey Solomon is a proud mum to five children and lives at Pickle Cottage with her husband Joe ( 
Image:
Instagram/Stacey Solomon)
Captioning the clip, Stacey joked: “Happy Sunday, lots of love from all of us. Joe’s cleaning the pool and the kids this morning [laughing face emoji].

Alongside a clip of Joe chasing their children with a pool cleaner on their stunning patio, Stacey added: “A great attempt at trying to get me pregnant again,” followed by two more laughing emojis, reports OK!.

Earlier this year, Stacey expressed her contentment with her rural lifestyle in Essex, telling the Mirror that she prefers being at home to going out partying. “I love coming home. My favourite part of the day is getting excited about coming home to Pickle Cottage, where I live with my husband Joe and five kids,” she said.

“Actually, my favourite thing in the world is getting on the sofa. And first the dogs, then all the pickles follow along, piling on top of me. Just laying with them, watching TV, having cuddles and being together… it’s where I belong. I know all too well there’ll be a day when they’d rather play the PlayStation, so I’m making the most of these moments.”

( 
Image:
instagram/ @staceysolomon)

Speakng to OK! in May, Joe confessed his love for fatherhood, saying he was “addicted to having babies”.

He added: “We’re at number six now. The baby bit goes so fast, and then before you know it, they’re toddlers then you yearn for babies again. We’re slightly addicted to babies it’s so nice to be needed. You think, ‘Six has to be it,’ but I’d never say never. They’re only babies for three or four years before Stacey starts wanting another one, so I have to make the most of it now!”

Joe laughed, but then became serious as he added: “I like to be hands-on. They’re only going to be kids for a short amount of time, so me and Stacey are just trying to make the most of it.”

The Late-Night Royal Meeting: King Charles III’s Delicate Balancing Act

Recent reports of a late-night meeting convened by King Charles III, with Prince William and Princess Anne in attendance, have ignited widespread speculation and intrigue. The secretive gathering is rumored to have focused on the future roles and titles of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, a topic that has stirred considerable controversy since the couple stepped back from their royal duties.

Tensions in the Royal Family

The relationship between Prince Harry and the rest of the royal family has been under intense scrutiny ever since Harry and Meghan distanced themselves from their royal roles. Their subsequent public criticisms of the royal institution have only added fuel to the fire, leading to mounting public pressure on King Charles to take decisive action—specifically, the potential stripping of Harry’s titles.

The King’s Dilemma

This delicate issue presents King Charles with a challenging dilemma. On one hand, removing Harry’s titles could be seen as a strong statement that the monarchy will not tolerate actions deemed disloyal or damaging to its reputation. On the other hand, such a move risks deepening the already significant rift within the family, potentially driving an irreparable wedge between Harry and his father, as well as his brother, Prince William.

The Role of William and Anne

In this context, the reported meeting with William and Anne takes on heightened significance. Both are key figures within the royal family, and their insights would be invaluable to King Charles as he navigates these complex dynamics. William, as the heir apparent, and Anne, known for her dedication to royal duties, bring a wealth of experience and understanding of the public and private pressures facing the monarchy.

Navigating Public Perception and Family Unity

King Charles faces the formidable task of balancing the public’s desire for accountability with the need to maintain family unity. The monarchy’s reputation for stability and tradition is at stake, and any decisions made in the wake of this meeting will have far-reaching implications, both for the royal family and for how it is perceived by the public.

Looking Ahead

As King Charles guides the royal family through these turbulent times, the decisions made during this late-night meeting will be crucial in shaping the future of the monarchy. The outcome will determine whether the royal family can emerge stronger and more united, or whether the divisions will continue to deepen in the face of modern challenges. All eyes are on the House of Windsor as it navigates this uncharted territory.

Meghan Markle SILENT as evidence mounts of baby ‘DOLL’ allegedly appearing with her, not ‘twins’

In a revelation that has sent shockwaves through the British royal family and the public, MI6 has reportedly discovered compelling evidence suggesting that Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, orchestrated an elaborate deception during the birth of her son, Archie. According to high-level sources within the intelligence agency, Meghan was not actually holding her newborn son during the now-iconic photo call outside Windsor Castle. Instead, she is alleged to have used a lifelike doll intended to deceive the public.

 

Details emerging from this investigation are nothing short of jaw-dropping. Our sources reveal that in the days leading up to the photo call, Meghan collaborated closely with a specialized prop and special effects company. This collaboration led to the creation of a hyper-realistic baby doll, complete with an artificial heartbeat and subtle movements to simulate a living, breathing infant. “The level of detail in this doll is truly astounding,” commented one MI6 operative, speaking anonymously. “From the delicate skin tone to the tiny fingernails, it’s virtually indistinguishable from a real newborn baby.”

 

The Duchess and her team reportedly went to extraordinary lengths to ensure the success of this deception. Further evidence from our sources suggests that Meghan may have even employed a surrogate to carry Archie to term, with the doll being presented to the world as her own biological son. This revelation raises serious questions about the legitimacy of Archie’s birth and the lengths the Sussexes may have gone to in crafting their public image.

When confronted with these allegations, Buckingham Palace has remained notably tight-lipped, fueling speculation that there may be truth to the claims. “The royal family is taking this matter extremely seriously,” said one palace insider. “There are extensive internal inquiries underway to get to the bottom of what happened.”

Supporters of Meghan Markle, however, have been quick to dismiss these allegations as baseless conspiracy theories. “This is just another example of the relentless campaign to smear and discredit Meghan,” said one prominent royal commentator. “The idea that she would go to such elaborate lengths to fake Archie’s birth is simply preposterous.”

 

Despite the dismissal from her supporters, for those familiar with Meghan’s past, the notion of such an elaborate deception is not entirely far-fetched. The former actress has long been accused of carefully curating her public image, using her connections in the media to shape her narrative and present a meticulously crafted persona to the world. “Meghan is a master of manipulation,” said one royal insider. “She has a history of using her connections and influence to get what she wants, and this latest revelation simply fits a pattern of behavior that we’ve seen time and time again.

 

The doll controversy is just the latest in a series of scandals and controversies that have surrounded the Duchess of Sussex since her marriage to Prince Harry. From the ongoing feud with the royal family to the couple’s high-profile exit from their royal duties, Meghan’s time in the spotlight has been marked by a seemingly endless stream of tabloid headlines and public scrutiny.

 

As the investigation continues, the world watches closely, eager to see how these revelations will impact the royal family and the public’s perception of Meghan Markle. Whether the allegations are ultimately proven true or dismissed as another unfounded conspiracy, they have undeniably added another layer of complexity to the already turbulent narrative of the Sussexes.

We’ve covered some impressive superyachts in our time, from Jeff Bezos’ $700m mega-flex to the $3 billion superyacht submarine that no one wants to buy.

However, a new frontrunner for the most luxurious vessel may have just entered the chat…

From million-pound-a-week superyachts to private islands, A-listers know how to relax, unwind, and soak up the sun.

Now, thanks to The Moorings, you can explore the ‘Ultimate Celebrity Superyacht’, inspired by some of the world’s most famous celebrities, including David Beckham, Rafael Nadal, and Beyoncé.

The yacht combines luxurious features from yachts either owned or chartered by these shooting stars. For example, it boasts a helipad inspired by the Regina D’Italia,

which was chartered by Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker, and a luxury ensuite dressing room from Rafael Nadal’s 80 Sunreef Power Great White.

The Moorings has meticulously designed the yacht using AI to combine these luxurious features into one incredible vessel. The result is a yacht fit for royalty… or reality TV royalty, at least. With its sleek, stylish exterior inspired by the beautiful Ghost II yacht chartered by Adele and Angelina Jolie, and a bright, contemporary interior, the yacht offers light, airy spaces with cozy soft furnishings that make you feel at home on the water.

Speed is a key feature, too. With a top speed of over 37 knots, modelled after Charles LeClerc’s Rebel Riva 66, this yacht isn’t just about luxury but performance too. Celebrities often brand their yachts personally, like David Beckham’s ‘Seven’; if you’re ever lucky enough to own a vessel as nice as this, be sure to name it after the humble writer that put it on your radar…

The yacht’s living quarters are pretty impressive too. Inspired by Rafael Nadal’s 80 Sunreef Power Great White, it features a luxury king bedroom with a sea view and a fold-out balcony. It also includes a large ensuite dressing room, a designer dining area for 25 people, and a spacious sun deck modelled after NORA, chartered by Kylie Jenner.

Entertainment options are similarly abundant. The yacht boasts a 400m-square heated pool, inspired by Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s experience on the Flying Fox, and an entertainment space for 110 people, much like the one on NORA. There’s also a private cinema and a stern garage with a state-of-the-art jet ski, perfect for exploring open waters like Rafael Nadal.

All this comes as search data shows a substantial increase in interest for ‘luxury yacht holidays’, up 24% in the last three months. Searches for ‘luxury sailing yacht charter’ have risen by 100% in that same time. Katrina Lawson, Head of Brand and Acquisition at Sunsail & The Moorings said: “With more and more people searching for luxury holidays, where better to look for inspiration than through celebrities.”

As the world’s richest Grand Prix approaches, keep an eye out for some of these incredible features appearing on the yachts of the rich and famous… you never know, you might need design inspiration for your own boat one day.

Victor Wanyama is the highest paid player at MLS club CF Montreal, going by data released by the MLS Players Association recently, and this is thanks to a rule initiated by David Beckham.

The midfielder’s 2024 salary stands at $1.8 million (Ksh236,700,001), which is his annual guaranteed compensation, with his basic salary currently standing at $1.44 million (Ksh189,360,000).

Wanyama’s salary is $500,000 (Ksh65,750,000) more than the second highest earner at Montreal, being Venezuelan striker Josef Martinez, who takes home $1.3 million (Ksh172,145,467) both in basic salary

and annual guaranteed compensation, after signing a one-year deal when he joined the Canadian side at the start of the current campaign.

Uruguayan striker Matias Coccaro is the third highest earner at Montreal with a basic annual salary of $800,000 (Ksh105,200,000)

which goes up to $888,000 (Ksh116,772,000) in annual guaranteed compensation.

Wanyama has not enjoyed regular playing time for close to a year now at Montreal but his salary is down to the fact that he is Montreal’s Designated Player.

In the MLS, clubs are given only three Designated Players whose wages are allowed to be greater than the league average.

Wanyama has been the club’s Designated Player since he joined as a free agent from Premier League side Tottenham Hotspur in March 2020, initially on an annual salary of $3 million (Ksh406,554,212), before he took a massive pay cut while negotiating his current deal that was signed in January 2023.

The Designated Player Rule in MLS was implemented alongside the salary cap regulations ahead of the 2007 season in anticipation of the arrival of former Real Madrid and England star David Beckham at LA Galaxy that summer.

Beckham was the first high-profile and internationally recognised player to sign for an MLS side and the Designated Player Rule has since been unofficially dubbed the ‘Beckham Rule’

Since then, big-name players have moved Stateside with the likes of Steven Gerrard, Wayne Rooney, Andrea Pirlo, Frank Lampard and now Lionel Messi, who is the highest earner in the MLS presently on $20.45 million per year, as one of the Designated Players at Inter Miami.

The rule allows each club participating in MLS to sign up to three players who will not be considered under the team’s salary cap (either through wages or the transfer fee), which enables MLS sides to sign and compete for high-profile players from the wider overseas international market.

MLS player salaries are limited by a salary cap that has been in place since the league’s inception in 1996, which was introduced to prohibit team owners from excessive spending on player salaries and to ensure a fairer balance among teams who weren’t as financially well-off.

It is therefore the rule that allowed Wanyama to negotiate a bigger salary at Montreal and it has served him well as he is still enjoying the big bucks even though his minutes have greatly reduced.
CF Montreal midfielder Victor Wanyama continues to be the highest paid player at the club, with his 2024 salary sitting at $1.8 million (Ksh236,700,001). This makes him the top earner at Montreal, thanks to the Designated Player Rule in the MLS. Wanyama’s salary is significantly higher than that of Venezuelan striker Josef Martinez, who earns $1.3 million (Ksh172,145,467) in both basic salary and annual guaranteed compensation. Uruguayan striker Matias Coccaro follows as the third highest earner with a basic annual salary of $800,000 (Ksh105,200,000).Despite not getting regular playing time, Wanyama’s status as a Designated Player allows him to command such a high salary. The Designated Player Rule, often referred to as the ‘Beckham Rule’, was introduced in 2007 in anticipation of David Beckham’s arrival at LA Galaxy. This rule permits MLS clubs to sign up to three players whose wages exceed the league average, enabling teams to attract top talent from around the world.The introduction of the Designated Player Rule has seen a number of high-profile players join MLS clubs, including the likes of Steven Gerrard, Wayne Rooney, Andrea Pirlo, Frank Lampard, and now Lionel Messi. Messi currently tops the salary charts in the MLS, earning $20.45 million per year as a Designated Player at Inter Miami.The salary cap regulations in MLS, in place since the league’s inception in 1996, aim to maintain financial parity among teams and prevent excessive spending on player salaries. This system has allowed players like Wanyama to negotiate lucrative deals, even if their playing time may have decreased.Stay connected with us for more updates and informative content. Your support motivates us to continue providing valuable information.