Blog

Linda Robson has issued a stark warning to certain former members of the Loose Women panel ahead of the release of her tell-all book, where she’s not afraid of ‘hurting feelings’

Loose Women star Linda Robson has warned her former co-stars that they better ‘watch out’ as she’s set to dish the dirt in her tell-all book.

The ITV star, 64, has insisted that she ‘doesn’t care’ about hurting feelings or ruffling feathers as she’s set to tell the ‘truth’ about certain former members of the Loose Women panel.

Lifting the lid on the details included in the memoir, Linda shared: “I don’t care about the people not in my family, but I don’t want to upset anyone in my family.

“At the moment the book is called, ‘In All Honesty’, which I think is really boring and on the back of the book there is going to be a picture of me with a zip over my mouth.

Linda has insisted that she ‘doesn’t care’ about hurting feelings or ruffling feathers ( 
Image:
David Fisher/REX/Shutterstock for NTA)

Linda is set to spill the beans ( 
Image:
Alan Chapman/Dave Benett/Getty I)

“A few people have annoyed me or upset me, they better watch out for themselves, because they’re in the book and I’m coming for them. But mostly I’ll be nice about everybody,” she told her Loose Women co-star, Kaye Adams, on her podcast How To Be 60.

Linda’s book announcement comes after rumours that she had a bitter falling out with her Birds of a Feather co-star Pauline Quirke.

Although Linda has continuously denied the rumours, Pauline was nowhere to be seen in the Birds of a Feather special back in 2020, leaving fans convinced that she and Linda had ended their friendship of fifty years.

Rumours of a bitter falling out with her Birds of a Feather co-star Pauline Quirke have been rife ( 
Image:
ExpressStar)
The Loose Women favourite told The Mirror that the rumours were hurtful.

“People say Pauline and I have fallen out,” she explained.

“Obviously I couldn’t see her during lockdown but I’ve seen her since.”

Linda went on to confirm that Pauline simply wanted out of her acting career, and that was the sole reason why she didn’t join in on the TV special.

Linda Robson and Pauline Quirke shut down rumours of a feud as Birds of a Feather stars enjoy ‘lovely lunch’ together ( 
Image:
mirror.co.uk)“She just doesn’t want to act anymore. She’s had enough – it’s long hours.

“She’s concentrating on her drama academies. She’s very hands-on, going to classes and all that,” Linda added.

Loose Women erupted into chaos today as Carol McGiffin and Nadia Sawalha clashed over Shamima Begum’s new podcast with the BBC

Loose Women stars Carol McGiffin and Nadia Sawalha clashed today over Shamima Begum’s new podcast with the BBC.

Shamima Begum said her ISIS days were over in a new BBC podcast. She came to be known after having infamously disappeared from London in 2015 with school friends Kadiza Sultana and Amira Abase to support the Islamic militant group.

As the Loose Women panellists discussed Shamima’s podcast on their show today, Carol insisted she didn’t want to hear what Shamima had to say as she clashed with fellow panellists – Nadia Sawalha, Charlene White and Judi Love.

Carol and Nadia clashed ( 
Image:
ITV)
Carol began to speak, saying: “I think the majority of people -” before Charlene spoke to add: “Should we not know -”

“No no no, why her?” Carol fumed as she shouted over her colleagues before Nadia then went on to add as the audience listened: “Because she has an incredible amount of information. If we want to stop -“

Carol quickly fumed: “What are you doing? Sitting here making excuses for her? I’m sorry, the decision has been made. She’s not here and she’s not allowed to come back. I don’t want to hear what she’s got to say.”

She didn’t hold back with her comments. ( 
Image:
ITV)
“I hear that, and I know a lot of people feel that way. What do you think about the idea – if she was radicalised, that we were able to get more information and maybe stop the amount of radicalisation, wouldn’t that be a useful thing for this country?” Nadia said.

In 2019, Begum was found in a refugee camp, but the UK – she was born in London – withdrew her citizenship and banned her from entering. Begum is challenging the decision and insists she no longer supports the group.

The panel were discussing Shamima’s podcast ( 
Image:
ITV)” We went to Isis, that was it. It was over, it was over and done with,” she said in the podcast, “This is, I feel, worse than a prison I think it’s because at least with prison sentences you know that there will be an end but here you don’t know if there’s going to be an end.”

After her story was made public, it caused a debate among some over whether she should be allowed back into the country.

“I don’t think it’s actually towards me. I think it’s towards Isis,” she shared When they think of Isis they think of me because I’ve been put on the media so much but what was there to obsess over?”

Loose Women star Denise Welch reacted to Piers Morgan’s son Spencer Morgan’s tweet asking if ITV had apologised to the former Good Morning Britain presenter

Denise Welch has been embroiled in another Twitter spat with Piers Morgan’s son Spencer.

The Loose Women panelist was branded an “abusive bully” by the former Good Morning Britain presenter’s son.

The public row began as Spencer, 29, tweeted to ask if ITV had apologised to his father, 57, after Piers asked for his job at GMB back in a tweet.

Piers sensationally quit Good Morning Britain two years ago following his outbursts about Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Oprah Winfrey interview – where he claimed he didn’t believe a number of revelations made.

GMB weatherman Alex Beresford slammed Piers on air, who later reacted by storming off set and quitting the show.

Denise Welch has clashed with Piers Morgan’s son Spencer on Twitter ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)

Spencer Morgan (pictured on the right) branded Denise an ‘abusive bully’ ( 
Image:
Instagram)
Despite having his own programme on GB News, Piers made it clear he wants his ITV job back.

Piers tweeted: “I seem to recall being forced out of my job at @GMB for disbelieving Harry & Meghan’s unsubstantiated racism claims against the Royal Family. Now he’s finally admitted there was no racism, two questions: a) Do I get my old job back? b) Why should we believe a word they say?”

And in support of his father, Spencer later posted on the social media network: “Have @itv apologised to @piersmorgan yet?”

But, Loose Women star Denise, 64, didn’t agree that the channel had to say sorry to Piers as she replied to Spencer with: “What for?? Has he apologised to the nation for his abuse of people not vaccinated?? For terrifying people on a daily basis for 2 yrs!!! For bullying people with mental health issues??”

Spencer backed his father as Piers asked for his Good Morning Britain job back ( 
Image:
INSTAGRAM)
Spencer then hit back at Denise as he wrote: “Lol. You’re the most abusive bully on this app. Do one”.

“Oh please!!!,” Denise responded, with a string of laughing face emojis.

Denise and Piers have a long-standing feud and have regularly clashed on Twitter in the past – with Piers blocking Denise on the platform in 2017.

In 2020, Denise even came off of Twitter after the pair disagreed over vaccinations and the coronavirus in the pandemic.

Piers quit GMB after storming off set in a row about Meghan Markle ( 
Image:
ITV)Denise accused the media of “fear-mongering” in the pandemic as she and Piers disagreed before she took a break from the social media platform.

Speaking on the fallout at the time, Denise said: “I’ve had enough of it. I’ve said my piece and I tried to do what I could for the mental health of the people who follow me.

“Now I’m just keeping my head down and looking after myself and my family.”

In October, Denise branded Piers and his son Spencer “utter a******s” in reaction to a tweet from Spencer which read: “Got told off by a Meghan Markle fan last night. No surprise, she looked like had multiple screws loose. [sic]

Denise and Piers have been embroiled in a long-term fallout ( 
Image:
ITV)
“Told her to DM Piers and do one.”

Denise hit back as she replied with: “Referring to someone as having ‘multiple screws loose’, I’ve been a mental health ambassador for 30 yrs.

“We fight constantly to change this terminology. Go Morgan’s you utter a*******s!!!”

Piers then got involved as he retweeted Denise’s post and wrote: “The world’s most vicious & abusive ‘mental health ambassador’ now attacks my son. Welch is a repellent con artist trading off mental health to make money – like Markle, the very worst kind of woke virtue-signalling fraud.”

Royal Drama Unfolds: Meghan Markle’s Unexpected Request to King Charles

 

Meghan Markle, known for her controversial decisions, has reportedly made a surprising formal request to King Charles III amidst ongoing tensions within the royal family.

Initially, Meghan and her father-in-law appeared to share a close bond, with King Charles stepping in to escort her down the aisle in the absence of Meghan’s father during her wedding to Prince Harry.

However, cracks began to show in their relationship when Meghan and Harry decided to step back from their royal duties and move to the United States.

In recent months, Meghan has further strained her relationship with King Charles by publicly discussing the marital issues between him and Prince Harry.

Despite this, a new development has emerged suggesting that Meghan is seeking reconciliation with her husband’s father before their imminent departure to California.

According to a reliable source, Meghan has expressed her desire to meet privately with King Charles to mend their friendship.

Royal correspondent Neil Sean revealed that Meghan has penned a letter to King Charles, aiming to address past grievances and clarify their actions over the past few years.

The contents of the letter are expected to provide insight into Meghan’s perspective and potentially pave the way for improved relations between the two parties.

However, the outcome of this meeting remains uncertain, as it is unclear whether King Charles will agree to Meghan’s request.

During the recent state funeral for Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Harry found himself seated behind King Charles and Queen Camilla, prompting speculation about the dynamics within the royal family.

While some viewed this seating arrangement as a sign of disrespect towards Harry, others suggested that it symbolized King Charles’s desire to have his son close by during the somber event.

Royal experts have emphasized the complexity of these relationships and the significance of gestures within the royal hierarchy.

As the Duke and Duchess of Sussex navigate their post-royal life, the spotlight remains on Prince Harry’s evolving relationship with his father, King Charles.

The public scrutiny surrounding their interactions underscores the challenges faced by the royal family in maintaining unity amidst personal differences and public expectations.

Meghan’s attempt to reconcile with King Charles reflects a desire for harmony within the family, but whether this will lead to tangible improvements remains to be seen.

In the midst of royal drama and speculation, one thing is certain – the dynamics within the House of Windsor continue to captivate audiences worldwide.

Meghan Markle’s unexpected request to King Charles adds another layer of intrigue to the ongoing saga of the royal family, highlighting the complexities of relationships under the public eye.

As Meghan and Harry prepare to embark on a new chapter in their lives, the outcome of their interactions with the royal family remains a topic of intense interest and speculation.

King Charles Makes Bold Move: Prince Harry’s Title Stripped Away

King Charles has made a momentous move that affects none other than Prince Harry and Meghan Markle – or rather, the once-revered royals who now stand without their HRH titles. After three years since the notable Mexit saga, a significant shift has occurred. The Royal Family’s official website, a digital stage showcasing titles and distinctions, has erased Harry’s HRH designation as if removing a smudge from a pristine canvas.
The Duke of Sussex’s official page no longer carries the “his Royal Highness” label, a move that has been expected for some time. The palace had been unequivocal – the Sussexes would relinquish their glittering HRH titles upon their departure for the realm of Hollywood aspirations.

Remember the palace’s resounding announcement? The one that reverberated across headlines, declaring the Sussexes’ decision to step back as senior working members of the royal family, thus relinquishing their HRH titles? The outcome is evident – the titles have been stripped away.

However, the story doesn’t conclude there. This isn’t merely about altering a few letters on a webpage; it’s about making a resounding statement that echoes through the digital domain. Harry and Meghan’s names now appear lower on the family’s main page, just above the contentious Prince Andrew. It’s a striking reconfiguration of the royal hierarchy.

And who could overlook the courtroom drama, where Harry insisted on retaining the HRH title? It seems this insistence may have unintended consequences, paving the way for the website makeover the Sussexes likely didn’t anticipate. Their pledge to distance themselves from the HRH label appears to be upheld by the new king, King Charles.

As the dust settles in this digital arena, let’s not overlook the gathering storm clouds on Harry and Meghan’s Hollywood horizon. Their podcast aspirations crumbled, and even their much-anticipated Netflix venture failed to secure the Emmy recognition they had hoped for. It turns out that the world isn’t as captivated by their royal intrigue as they might have thought.

Credit must be given where it’s due. Their attempts to challenge the monarchy have inadvertently shifted the spotlight onto the rest of the royal family, highlighting their exemplary conduct in contrast to the Sussexes’ missteps, as aptly observed by Lady Colin.

Peering into the crystal ball of the future, it becomes apparent that King Charles is steering the royal ship toward a brighter horizon. With plans to transform royal residences into museums and harness the monarchy’s financial potential, the royal brand is poised for a renaissance, untainted by grifters or tarnished legacies.

YOU SOLD YOUR BIRTHRIGHT! King Charles Warns Harry Off After He Asked Of What Late Queen Willed Him

In a moment filled with deep emotion, Queen Elizabeth II, the longest-reigning monarch in British history, passed away on September 8, 2022, at the age of ninety-six.

Her death not only created an irreplaceable void but also signaled the start of a new chapter in British history.

Passing of Queen Elizabeth II Marks the Beginning of a New Era

 

In a moment filled with deep emotion, Queen Elizabeth II, the longest-reigning monarch in British history, passed away on September 8, 2022, at the age of ninety-six.

Her death not only created an irreplaceable void but also signaled the start of a new chapter in British history.

Following her passing, Charles, the Queen’s eldest son, assumed the throne as King Charles III.

Alongside him, his wife, Camilla Parker Bowles, took on the role of Queen Consort, a title that had been the subject of much speculation and scrutiny.

Despite initial doubts, she has gradually gained respect and acknowledgment as the King’s partner.

The transition of power also brought about notable changes in the roles of Prince William and Kate Middleton.

They were granted the titles Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge, underscoring their growing significance within the royal family.

As the direct heir to the throne by virtue of being the King’s eldest son, Prince William’s new position reinforces the monarchy’s continuity and stability.

Meanwhile, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who had previously withdrawn from royal duties, remained unaffected by these alterations, sticking to their decision to pursue independent endeavors and establish their own life.

In the wake of Queen Elizabeth’s demise, the nation mourned her loss by adorning streets and public areas across Britain with floral tributes.

Even outside the United Kingdom, the British Embassy in Dublin, Ireland, became a gathering spot for those wishing to pay their respects.

The passing of Queen Elizabeth II ushered in a period of transition and adjustment for the British monarchy.

As King Charles III and his family navigate their fresh roles and responsibilities, the world observes with a blend of anticipation and nostalgia.

Queen Elizabeth II reigned for more than seven decades, embodying stability and continuity for the British populace.

Her unwavering commitment to her duties and her poise under pressure earned her widespread respect and admiration globally.

Beyond her official obligations, the Queen supported over 600 charities and organizations, actively promoting social welfare and environmental protection.

Her dedication to public service and her ability to connect with individuals from all walks of life left an enduring impact on British society.

The passing of Queen Elizabeth II has sparked discussions regarding the future of the British monarchy.

While some argue that the monarchy is an outdated institution incompatible with modern society, others contend that it offers a sense of continuity and stability, constituting a vital aspect of British culture and heritage.

King Charles has pledged to uphold his mother’s legacy of service and commitment, expressing openness to modernizing the monarchy while preserving its traditions.

Ultimately, the monarchy’s future hinges on the support of the British people and the royal family’s adaptability to changing times.

Transitioning to a new reign invariably brings about uncertainty and change.

The British populace grieves the loss of their cherished Queen while also peering into the future with hope and expectation.

King Charles’s reign heralds a new era in British history, and the monarchy’s evolution under his leadership remains to be seen.

One certainty is that the British monarchy, having endured for centuries and weathered numerous challenges, is poised to persist as a cornerstone of British society for years to come.

Queen Elizabeth’s passing reverberated globally, prompting leaders worldwide to convey their condolences and pay homage to her remarkable life and service.

A respected figure on the international stage, the Queen’s death evoked feelings of sorrow and admiration.

The world watched as the British populace mourned their Queen’s loss and celebrated the ascension of a new King, observing with a mix of curiosity and respect.

King Charles’s reign ushers in a new era for the British monarchy, characterized by change, adaptation, hope, and anticipation.

As the monarchy enters this new phase, it is expected to continue evolving and adapting, remaining a pivotal component of British life for the foreseeable future.

A move that would divide opinion: Kate Middleton and Prince William plan to move princess Charlotte and Prince Louis away from buckingham Palace

 

 

Kate Middleton and Prince William could be set to make a very bold move that would see their two children move away from the royal residence of Buckingham Palace.

With King Charles III implementing a new policy that is aimed to reduce the number of working royals in the family, a lot of thinking is being done about the futures of the youngest royals in the family.

Prince George, the oldest of Kate and William’s three children, is heir to the throne and can become King in the future, but it begs the question as to what will happen with his two siblings, Charlotte and Louis.

Sources close to Prince William and Catherine, Princess of Wales, told The Daily Mail and The Daily Beast that they have taken a decision about their two youngest children.

Fears they could end up like Harry

The family do not want the children to develop the same ‘spare’ mentality that has characterized Prince Harry’s recent royal career.

Therefore, William and Kate want their two children to pursue a future away from Buckingham Palace so that they can find genuine meaning.

Of course, this hardly means they are being left to fend for themselves as some sort of occupation will be found for them through royal contacts.

It is clear that Princess Charlotte is a very popular little girl, having recently met Travis Kelce and Jason Kelce at a Taylor Swift show in London.

Travis said that Princess Charlotte was an absolute delight. Jason responded by saying: “Prince William was fantastic, but the highlight was Princess Charlotte. Prince George was great, too. She was so f****** adorable. Like, I cannot express how… I don’t know, maybe it’s because I have three girls now. She had fire to her, she was asking questions, that was the most electric part.”

King Charles Stunned by Princess Anne’s Bold Support for Prince William and Kate Middleton

In the hallowed halls of Buckingham Palace, where whispers of tradition and duty echo through the corridors, a storm brews unseen by the pub…

In the hallowed halls of Buckingham Palace, where whispers of tradition and duty echo through the corridors, a storm brews unseen by the public eye.

Amidst the opulent tapestries and gilded portraits, one question lingers in the minds of many: What will become of Princess Anne, the only daughter of Queen Elizabeth II and a steadfast pillar of the royal family? As the transition of power looms with the ascent of her nephew Prince William to the throne, Princess Anne finds herself at the center of speculation.

In a surprising turn of events, the esteemed sister of the King has made a candid statement about the speculation surrounding the succession to the throne.

A palpable tension hangs heavy in the air, signaling a tumultuous chapter for the British royal family. The Princess of Wales, once a beacon of grace and elegance, now finds herself sidelined, recovering from an undisclosed cancer diagnosis—a gap that Prince William must now endeavor to fill.

 

Amidst this turmoil, a ray of hope emerges from the shadows, casting light upon the dimly lit corridors of power. Princess Anne, the indomitable daughter of the late Queen Elizabeth, steps forward with quiet determination, ready to lend her support to her nephew. The discussion surrounding the potential abdication of King Charles in favor of his son has sparked renewed speculation. 

Princess Anne addresses the nation, clarifying that the Monarch is merely a caretaker until Prince William assumes the throne. Recent revelations suggest that the Prince of Wales’s position has been reinvigorated following events in other monarchies, such as Queen Margrethe II of Denmark’s unexpected abdication. Speculation about the British monarchy’s future has intensified due to the Princess’s health issues.

At 75 years old, King Charles ascended to the throne in 2022 following the passing of Queen Elizabeth II. However, some members of the public have expressed a preference for Prince William to succeed his father, citing his popularity compared to King Charles. The prospect of this has caused considerable anxiety among those who could potentially be affected by the change.

The couple had hoped for several years to parent their children out of the public eye, but ascending the throne would alter everything. This suggests that Prince William has become the enforcer of the firm since the deaths of his grandparents, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip. He has also recently taken a tough stance on his relationship with Prince Harry.

As a father of three, Prince William has earned a reputation for being resolute and steadfast, with his broken childhood contributing to his strong character. His word carries significant weight within the family, and he has been prepared to take a tough stance on various issues, including those concerning Andrew and Harry.

It is well-known within the family that Prince William has imposed a strict ban on Harry’s return to the royal fold, though King Charles, who misses his son, may be more willing to relent.

It was recently announced that the West Midlands city will host a sporting tournament in three years, the first time the UK has hosted since 2014. The Invictus Games, founded by Harry in partnership with Sir Keith Mills and the Royal Foundation of the Wales, could provide an opportunity for royal visits.

The Duke may be looking to spend more time in the UK in the coming months and years, and it would be significant for him to return home for these games. Members of the family are expected to support him, and it is certainly possible that his father and brother will attend.

CELEBRITY: Prince William makes the sad announcement that leaves his fans in tears: “My wife it’s been…” Check the comments!

 

At the prestigious British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTAs), amidst the glitz and glamour, Prince William’s somber demeanor cast a shadow over the proceedings as he spoke about his wife’s recent health struggles

Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge, recently underwent abdominal surgery at The London Clinic, shrouded in secrecy as the royal family opted to keep the details private. While King Charles III had been transparent about his own health battles, Prince William chose to respect his wife’s wishes for confidentiality.

With a heavy heart, Prince William shared a glimpse into their lives, admitting to watching fewer films than ever before, his attention consumed by concerns for Kate’s well-being. His sadness was palpable as he expressed a desire to catch up on missed moments, promising to compile a list of films for future viewing.

As speculation swirls around the nature of Kate’s condition, from Crohn’s Disease to post-childbirth complications, Kensington Palace has clarified that it is not cancer. However, the lack of concrete information has fueled rumors and raised questions about the Duchess’s privacy in contrast to the King’s transparency.

Despite the uncertainty, one thing remains certain: Kate’s health struggles have deeply impacted the royal family. Prince William, alongside their children, has rallied to her side, providing support and care during her recovery. His temporary withdrawal from official duties reflects the gravity of the situation, emphasizing the importance of family in times of adversity.

As Easter approaches, there is hope for Kate’s full recovery and return to her royal duties. Until then, Prince William’s sadness serves as a poignant reminder of the challenges faced by those in the public eye, navigating personal struggles under the relentless scrutiny of the world’s gaze

Breaking News: Meghan Markle SUE Royal Family when king Charles Removes Archie From…See More

In a move that has sent shockwaves through both the British royal family and the public, Meghan Markle is reportedly considering legal action against the Royal Family after King Charles III made a controversial decision to remove her son, Archie, from the line of succession. This development has sparked widespread debate and criticism, with Meghan labeling the move as “unfair” and expressing her intent to challenge it through legal channels.

The issue began when King Charles III announced a significant change in the line of succession. Traditionally, the line of succession follows a clear protocol, but recent adjustments have led to Archie’s removal from the immediate line of succession. This decision is reportedly rooted in changes to royal protocols and Charles’ desire to modernize the monarchy’s approach to succession.

Meghan Markle has been vocal about her dissatisfaction with the decision. In a statement issued through her legal team, Meghan described the removal of Archie from the line of succession as a direct attack on her family and a move that undermines the values of fairness and justice. She has expressed deep concern over how this decision might impact Archie’s future and the legacy of her family.

“To exclude Archie from the line of succession is not only unjust but also reflects a broader issue of fairness within the royal institution,” Meghan stated. “We are deeply troubled by this move and are exploring all legal avenues to address this injustice.”

The potential legal action is significant as it could challenge the very foundation of royal succession protocols. Meghan’s legal team is reportedly consulting with constitutional experts and solicitors specializing in royal law to evaluate the viability of their case. The situation has drawn parallels to previous legal battles involving royal family members, but this case is unique in its focus on succession rights for a non-heir family member.

Public reaction has been mixed. Supporters of Meghan argue that her stance is a necessary fight for fairness and equality within the royal system. They believe that the decision to remove Archie reflects outdated practices and fails to consider the evolving dynamics of the modern monarchy. Critics, however, contend that such legal battles could further tarnish the public image of the royal family and undermine its credibility

This situation is unprecedented in modern British history. Historically, changes to the line of succession have been rare and often involve extensive deliberation within the royal family. The last major change occurred with the passing of the Succession to the Crown Act 2013, which ended the practice of male primogeniture. However, the current situation involving Archie is more complex, as it involves an individual who was previously in the line but is now being removed.

The Royal Family has yet to issue an official statement on the matter. However, sources close to the family suggest that the decision was made with careful consideration and reflects the need to adapt to contemporary royal protocols. The move has been described as part of a broader effort to streamline royal roles and responsibilities, particularly in light of the changing roles of younger royals

As Meghan Markle and her legal team prepare to challenge King Charles III’s decision, the world watches with bated breath. The outcome of this legal battle could have far-reaching implications for the British monarchy and its approach to succession. For now, Meghan’s assertion of unfairness and her fight for her family’s place in royal history remain at the forefront of this unfolding drama.