Premier Smith Takes Aim at the Lawless Liberal Government with Tucker Carlson in Alberta

 

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith delivered a scathing denunciation of Canada’s current Liberal government during a fiery interview with Tucker Carlson, exposing alleged government lawlessness and criticizing federal overreach in recent emergency measures. Smith condemned frozen bank accounts, jailed pastors, and long detentions as symptomatic of deep political decay.

 

Smith did not mince words, labeling the Trudeau administration as “lawless” after a federal court ruled its invocation of the Emergency Act illegal. She conveyed profound sympathy for victims of what she described as federal government 𝓪𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓮, spotlighting the ongoing imprisonment of four men near the Montana border on political grounds without trial or bail.

In an explosive exchange, Smith openly challenged mainstream media’s narrative control and invited the CBC to interview her candidly, daring them to broadcast the truth. Her defiant posture underscored the widening gap between Alberta’s provincial leadership and Ottawa’s federal government, further igniting political tensions across Canada.

 

Discussing Alberta’s energy crisis, Smith emphasized the province’s near-blackout emergency, warning of devastating consequences from unreliable solar and wind power. She sharply criticized Canada’s environmental minister, labeling him an “environmental zealot” and questioning his qualifications to manage Alberta’s energy grid, which continues to rely heavily on fossil fuels.

 

Smith recounted Alberta’s close brush with rolling blackouts affecting 120,000 homes, a crisis narrowly averted by emergency alerts. She underscored the critical need for dependable base load energy from natural gas, rejecting what she called ideological opposition to fossil fuels that endangers lives and economic stability.

She highlighted the technical complexity of power grids and condemned the federal government’s interference by appointing ideologues like Steven Guilbeault, who lacks engineering expertise, to oversee policies that directly affect Alberta’s energy production and infrastructure.

 

Addressing the systemic political and cultural disconnect that fuels current conflicts, Smith noted conservative disengagement from major institutions, leaving media, academia, and arts dominated by progressive ideology. This gap, she argued, alienates rural communities and energy producers whose livelihoods underpin critical infrastructure.

 

Smith praised recent American energy policies that contradict their political rhetoric by boosting oil and gas exports. She urged Canada to similarly double down on oil and gas development to ensure energy security for North America rather than relying on unstable foreign sources.

Her interview with Carlson illuminated stark divisions within Canada over governance, energy policy, and freedom, with Smith boldly denouncing federal mismanagement and calling for provincial resilience. Her remarks send a clear message: Alberta stands defiantly against a federal government perceived as out of control and disconnected from its people’s needs.

 

The premier’s provocations have already reverberated across political circles, signaling an intensification of the battle over Canada’s future direction. This confrontation between Alberta and Ottawa, framed by issues of law, liberty, and energy dominance, is unfolding rapidly with profound implications for Canadian governance and regional autonomy.

 

Smith’s challenge to federal authority, particularly her blunt rejection of the Emergency Act usage and long detentions without trial, raises critical questions about the limits of government power and adherence to rule of law in crisis situations.

The discussion also laid bare the complexity of Canada’s energy future, where sustainability aspirations clash with practical demands for reliable electricity. Smith’s firsthand account of grid instability starkly contrasts with federal promises of a green transition, exposing fractures in national energy strategy.

 

Her pointed critique of media complicity and institutional bias further fuels debates over freedom of speech and political representation in Canada, highlighting how divergent ideological narratives shape public discourse and policy debates.

 

As Albertans face real risks from rolling blackouts and stringent federal policies, Smith’s insistence on prioritizing affordable and stable energy resonates deeply, suggesting growing provincial assertiveness and calls for reform at the national level.

The Premier’s remarks underscore a critical moment in Canadian politics where competing visions of governance, energy, and freedom are clashing with escalating urgency, shaping the political landscape in Alberta and beyond.

 

This high-stakes interview crystallizes tensions 𝓉𝒽𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒾𝓃𝑔 to redefine federal-provincial relations, laying bare the contentious fault lines over power, liberty, and regional identity in contemporary Canada.

 

With rising political turmoil, Alberta asserts a fierce defense of its sovereignty and economic lifelines, challenging federal authority and demanding accountability for overreach and mismanagement.

Premier Smith’s resolute stand, articulated with raw candor during the Tucker Carlson interview, shines a spotlight on the fraught dynamics at play within Canada’s political framework amid spiraling conflicts and societal divides.

 

The unfolding 𝒹𝓇𝒶𝓂𝒶 marks a pivotal juncture, signaling intensified confrontation between provincial autonomy advocates and a federal government accused of lawlessness and reckless governance, with energy at the epicenter.

 

In sum, Alberta’s Premier Danielle Smith delivers a bold, urgent rebuke of Canada’s Liberal government’s approach to law enforcement and energy policy, galvanizing her province and amplifying national debates on governance, freedom, and the future of Canadian energy security.

The streets are angry!  A furious group of British lads has just issued a brutal message to Keir Starmer, and it’s spreading like wildfire. They are DONE with the “betrayal” and “broken promises.”

British youths are rising up in a fervent call to action against Labour leader Keir Starmer, expressing deep frustration over perceived incompetence and betrayal. Fueled by anger over broken promises and a sense of abandonment, they demand immediate change, urging their fellow citizens to reclaim their power and hold leaders accountable.

In a passionate outburst, a group of British lads voiced their discontent, declaring that they are fed up with Starmer’s leadership and the direction of the country. Their rallying cry echoed through social media, urging others to stand up against what they see as a betrayal of their values and hopes.

The frustration is palpable. Many feel that Starmer has not only failed to deliver on his promises but has also turned his back on the very people he claims to represent. The sentiment is that polite protests and petitions are no longer sufficient; it’s time for action.

With rising costs of living and stagnant wages, ordinary citizens are feeling the pinch. The lads argue that while they struggle, leaders like Starmer appear disconnected, more focused on maintaining their positions than addressing the real issues at hand. This disillusionment has sparked a fierce desire for change, with calls for a more accountable and relatable leadership.

The anger directed at Starmer transcends political affiliation; it’s about a collective sense of being ignored and disrespected. Many believe that the political elite are insulated from the consequences of their decisions, leading to a growing divide between them and the public.

As the calls for action intensify, there’s a growing consensus that the time for change is now. The lads’ passionate pleas resonate with a broader audience, reflecting a deep-seated frustration with the status quo. They demand a leader who stands firm on principles and genuinely fights for the interests of the people.

However, amidst the fervor, there’s a strong message of unity. The movement emphasizes the need for collective action, urging citizens to organize, speak out, and hold their leaders accountable. The anger, while powerful, must be channeled into constructive efforts for real change.

In a time when trust in leadership is waning, the British public is poised to make their voices heard. The lads’ rallying cry serves as a reminder that the future of the country lies in the hands of its people, and it’s time to reclaim that power.

As discussions around accountability and leadership continue, one thing is clear: the call for change is growing louder, and the British public is ready to demand better for their future.

Tuning in…

Bachelor Nation saw Hannah Godwin and Dylan Barbour find love and get engaged on Season 6 of “Bachelor in Paradise.”

Since then, the fan-favorite couple finally tied the knot in 2023 and has been keeping fans updated with their lives online.

Hannah famously first joined Bachelor Nation during Colton Underwood’s season of “The Bachelor,” who has since come out as gay and married his now-husband Jordan Brown.

Colton recently returned to TV and is currently part of the cast for Season 4 of the hit show “The Traitors.”

Deadline / Peacock / The Traitors
And both Hannah and Dylan have been tuning in to watch the new season unfold each week.

This week, Dylan posted a funny video on his Instagram page, showing him and Hannah reacting to Colton on the show. Over a clip of him intensely staring, Dylan wrote, “Watching my wife’s reaction when her ex comes on the screen.”

The video then shows clips of Colton on “The Traitors” before cutting to a wide shot of Dylan right next to Hannah, staring at her while she watches the TV.

Instagram
The Bachelor Nation star jokingly captioned the post, “Banish” and followers filled the comments with their reactions.

Fellow Bachelor Nation alum Demar Jackson teased, “Trynna catch Hannah slippin 👀 😂”

Adam Gottschalk posted a meme of someone sitting down and eating popcorn, and one person said, “hahahahahaah wait this is so funny 😂”

A fan tagged Hannah and wrote, “I know you are trying not to laugh lol,” to which she replied, “I had no clue what he was filming.”

Too funny! We love Hannah and Dylan’s content together, and we can’t wait to see how the rest of Colton’s time on the show goes.

Britani Bateman Reveals Her Shocking Alleged Call With Man Accused of Bigotry, Confirms She and Jared Osmond Called Off Their Engagement

Britani Bateman revealed her shocking alleged phone call with the man who was accused of bigotry, and shared that she contacted Bravo amid the controversy. Meanwhile, Britani also shared why she and Jared Osmond called off their engagement.

On the Real Housewives of Salt Lake City reunion, Meredith Marks accused Britani of supporting a bigoted manicure artist. But Britani denied it and claimed that she and Meredith already worked out the misunderstanding off-camera.

On SiriusXM’s Page Six Radio, Britani addressed the allegations.

“All I knew is that [the man] called me and said, ‘Hey, I do Meredith’s nails. I would love to do your nails for free,’” Britani recalled. “And I thought, ‘Well, yeah, sure. Anyone that does Meredith’s nails, you know, that’s a good stamp of approval right there.’ So he did my nails. The next thing I know he’s texting me, ‘Hey, I’m getting a bunch of bad reviews,’ on whatever platform it was. ‘Can you gimme a good review?’ I was like, ‘Yeah, sure. That’s the least I could do.’”

“[Then] someone sent me a text … with a screenshot and said, ‘Did you know this guy is anti-Semitic?’” she continued. “I was like, ‘What?’ So I called him myself. I didn’t, like, wait to hear. I pick up the phone and said, ‘Are you anti-Semitic?’ And he said, ‘Yep, sure am.’”

According to Britani, she then told him: “‘Don’t ever call me again. … You need to go get some help. You need some therapy. Go get some help and bye. Don’t ever contact me again.’”

Britani said she relayed this conversation to Meredith at the reunion, but it “doesn’t look like it aired.”

“[My call with him] was just off the heels of her calling me vile and disgusting and terrible person and all the things from [last season],” she went on. “So anyway, I hung up the phone immediately, took down the review and … made a public apology of some sort … And then I called Bravo and was just like, ‘Hey, this just happened.’ And Bravo was like, ‘Great. You handled it perfectly.’ And didn’t think another thought of it.”

Britani shared that she thinks Meredith steered the conversation in this direction because she feared having to talk about her drinking. Later on, Britani addressed when Meredith first confronted her off-camera about the manicure artist.

“[At first] I was like, ‘Are you effing kidding me? You can go to hell for calling me that … that’s a terrible thing to say unfounded,’” she said. “But then by the end I realized that, you know, she broke down and was really vulnerable with me and said, ‘Look, you know, I received death threats over my bat mitzvah.’”

At one point in the interview, Britani revealed why she and Jared called off their engagement.

“I’m not engaged,” she stated. “No, no, no ring. And as you know, like someone stole my ring outta my bag in New York. Maybe it’s a sign. I’m just kidding.”

“When we got back together in November, we [discussed a timeline]. And then we just, there was such a backlash with our kids … And we’ve got six together. I mean, between the two of us, not one of [our kids] thought, ‘Oh, this is a great idea. You guys should get married.’ … So we just decided to put the whole marriage talk on hold. … So we’re just feeling it out.”

But Britani clarified that they’re still together.

Bryan Abasolo is escalating his divorce battle into a scorched-earth legal campaign against Rachel Lindsay, and the stakes have never been higher.

Weeks after the Bachelorette couple’s separation turned into a public spectacle of back-and-forth accusations, Bryan, 44, has filed a massive counter-suit, alleging that Rachel’s public commentary and media appearances have systematically dismantled his professional reputation.

According to the filing, Bryan claims that Rachel’s portrayal of him as “financially dependent” has triggered a wave of harassment that has directly led to a collapse in his chiropractic practice.

“She didn’t just leave the marriage; she went on a media tour to ensure I could never work again,” Bryan’s legal representative stated in a brief shared on January 26. “The damage to his business isn’t just accidental; we are alleging it was a calculated attempt to ruin his livelihood.”

Bryan is now demanding millions of dollars in damages, arguing that Rachel must compensate him for the loss of his professional standing and the future earnings he has been deprived of.

“He is seeking to be made whole for the career she helped destroy while she was building her own brand on his back,” the filing continued. “She leveraged their private life for podcast downloads and headlines, and now she needs to pay for the fallout.”

Regarding the “free ride” narrative that has dominated social media, Bryan’s suit pushes back aggressively, claiming that Rachel is intentionally misrepresenting their financial history to humiliate him.

“The idea that he was just along for the ride is a lie designed to paint him as a villain,” a source close to Bryan told E! News earlier today. “He supported her for years behind the scenes, and now that she’s the one with the high-profile career, she’s using it to crush him.”

Although Rachel has maintained that she is simply speaking her truth about the end of their relationship, Bryan’s legal team argues that her “truth” crosses the line into professional defamation.

“There is a difference between sharing your feelings and launching a coordinated strike on someone’s ability to pay their rent,” the insider added. “The nuclear war started the moment she forgot that she was still married to a real person with a real business.”

Regarding the millions in damages, the suit specifies that the amount covers not only lost current revenue but also the “long-term brand damage” Bryan has suffered within the health and wellness industry.

“His name is now synonymous with the ‘messy divorce’ headlines she created,” his representative reasoned. “Patients are leaving, and new ones aren’t coming in. She effectively put a ‘closed’ sign on his door.”

That said, Rachel has reportedly been “blindside” by the scale of the counter-suit, with her own legal team preparing a vigorous defense against what they call “baseless and retaliatory” claims.

“Rachel is a lawyer; she knows the law, and she knows she hasn’t done anything but live her life,” a friend of the former Bachelorette shared. “Bryan is trying to turn a divorce into a lottery ticket because he’s scared of being on his own.”

Bryan then acknowledged the intensity of the legal war during a short statement to his followers, insisting that he is only fighting for fairness.

“I didn’t want it to get to this point, but I have to protect my future,” he reportedly noted. “I’m not going to let anyone—no matter how loud their microphone is—tell a story that ruins my life. I’m standing up for my name.”

The legal proceedings are expected to continue through the spring, with a court date set for late March to address the new damages claim.

If you were anywhere near the gates of Ferrari’s legendary headquarters this week, you wouldn’t have just heard an engine; you would have heard a statement of intent. The Prancing Horse has officially fired up its 2026 power unit, sending a raw, unfiltered message to the rest of the Formula 1 grid. But while the technical world is buzzing over the harmonics of this new beast, a quieter, perhaps more decisive revolution is taking place behind the garage doors—one that involves Lewis Hamilton and a ruthless reshuffling of the deck that proves the Fred Vasseur era is truly underway.

The Sound of Survival: Why the 2026 Fire-Up Matters

Winter in Maranello is traditionally a time of silence, secrecy, and the occasional controlled leak to the press. But this week, that silence was shattered by the distinct, aggressive growl of Ferrari’s 2026 challenger. For the casual fan, it’s a cool sound clip. For the paddock, it is a terrifying signal of readiness.

The 2026 regulations represent the most significant technical overhaul in modern Formula 1 history. We aren’t talking about a simple aerodynamic tweak or a fuel-flow adjustment. This is a fundamental rethink of how a race car generates speed. The new regulations demand a power unit where the electric motor (MGU-K) delivers nearly 500 horsepower—roughly half the total output—while the internal combustion engine runs on 100% sustainable fuel.

To fire up a full system this early in the development cycle is rare. It suggests that Ferrari has moved past the dreaded “does it work?” phase and straight into performance optimization. In a sport where time is the only currency that matters, Ferrari has just bought themselves a massive head start.

The sound itself tells a story. With the removal of the MGU-H (Motor Generator Unit – Heat), the engine is no longer electronically “polished.” The result is a V6 that sounds rawer, louder, and more mechanically honest. But for the engineers, that noise is data. A clean fire-up means the harmonics are stable, the crankshaft is holding up against the insane torque of the electric motor, and the integration philosophy is sound. They haven’t just built an engine; they’ve solved the complex puzzle of making an internal combustion engine shake hands with a high-voltage electrical system without tearing itself apart.

The Human Reset: Hamilton and Adami Part Ways

While the dyno rooms were vibrating with success, the human side of the garage witnessed a surgical strike. Reports confirm that Lewis Hamilton and race engineer Riccardo Adami are officially parting ways.

Adami is an institution at Ferrari. He was the calm voice in Sebastian Vettel’s ear for years, a stabilizing force known for his methodical, driven approach. But Formula 1 is not a sport for the sentimental, and under Fred Vasseur’s leadership, it seems “good enough” is no longer acceptable.

The split wasn’t born out of a dramatic fallout or a shouting match. Instead, it appears to be a calculated decision based on compatibility. Lewis Hamilton operates on a different frequency than most drivers. He doesn’t just need data; he needs anticipation. He requires a race engineer who can translate tire feel and car balance into strategy in real-time. In 2025, observers noted that Hamilton and Adami, while respectful, were often slightly out of sync—two brilliant minds speaking different dialects of the same language.

By moving Adami to a senior role within the Ferrari Driver Academy, the team has retained his immense institutional knowledge while clearing the seat next to Hamilton. It’s a “promotion” that doubles as a strategic reset. It signals that Ferrari is finally building the team around Lewis, rather than expecting Lewis to simply fit into an existing slot.

The Era of the “Energy Strategist”

Why is this engineer change so critical right now? Because the role of the race engineer is about to change forever.

In the current era, a race engineer is part psychologist, part traffic controller, and part technician. But in 2026, they will effectively become real-time energy strategists. With 50% of the car’s power coming from the battery, the management of energy deployment will be the difference between winning and losing.

Drivers will need to know exactly when to deploy that 500-horsepower electric kick, when to harvest energy, and when to conserve. A communication delay of even one second could leave a driver derated (out of battery power) halfway down a straight, effectively a sitting duck for an overtake.

The level of trust required for this dance is non-negotiable. Hamilton needs a voice in his ear that he trusts implicitly—someone who understands his “operating system” and can make split-second decisions without hesitation. Ferrari’s decision to replace Adami now, rather than wait for the pressure of the 2026 season, shows a foresight that has been lacking in previous years.

Vasseur’s Ruthless Pragmatism

This entire sequence of events—the aggressive engine timeline, the personnel changes—bears the signature of Team Principal Fred Vasseur. Since taking the helm, Vasseur has slowly but surely dismantled the “culture of fear” and replaced it with a culture of ruthless clarity.

In the past, Ferrari might have kept a veteran engineer in place out of respect or tradition. Vasseur, however, looks at the lap times. If a relationship isn’t yielding maximum performance, it is changed. Full stop.

This “performance over sentiment” approach is exactly what Lewis Hamilton has been craving. His move to Ferrari was never just about wearing red; it was about finding a team willing to do whatever it takes to win. By proactively fixing a dynamic that wasn’t 100% perfect, Ferrari is proving to Hamilton that they are as hungry for that eighth title as he is.

The 2026 Gamble: Engineering a Miracle

When you zoom out, the engine fire-up and the engineer swap are not separate stories. They are two sides of the same coin. Ferrari is attempting to align its hardware and its “software” (the people) perfectly for the start of the new regulation cycle.

The 2026 project is being treated as a blank slate. The car is designed around low drag and aggressive energy deployment. The team structure is being streamlined for faster decision-making. The “legacy” ways of doing things are being challenged.

For fans, the question remains: Can they pull it off? Early success on the dyno is promising, but it doesn’t guarantee a championship. Mercedes and Red Bull are undoubtedly working just as hard in their own factories. However, Ferrari’s willingness to disrupt its own stability in search of higher performance is a terrifyingly positive sign.

The roar from Maranello this week was more than just combustion. It was the sound of a giant waking up—electric-focused, unsentimental, and done with waiting. Ferrari isn’t hoping for a miracle in 2026; for the first time in a long time, they look like they are actively engineering one.

Lewis Hamilton knows his window is closing. But with a beast of an engine behind him and a fresh voice in his ear, he might just have found the weapon he needs to kick the door wide open one last time.

The Roar Returns to Fiorano

The deep, haunting silence that has lingered over Maranello since 2007 was shattered last Friday. It wasn’t just the sound of an engine firing up on the Fiorano asphalt; it was the roar of a declaration. When the Ferrari SF-26 rolled out of the garage, it didn’t just signal the start of a new season—it signaled the end of an era of compromise.

For nearly two decades, the Tifosi have waited. They have watched seasons start with hope and end in heartbreak. But as the engines cool and the data uploads from the first shakedown, the mood in Italy is different this time. It’s electric. The SF-26 isn’t a tweak. It isn’t a polish of last year’s mistakes. It is a 99% overhaul, a radical reinvention designed with a singular, obsessive purpose: to bring the World Championship back to Maranello.

With the 2026 regulations introducing shorter, narrower, and lighter cars, Ferrari saw more than just a rule change—they saw a blank sheet of paper. And on that paper, they have drawn a machine that experts are already calling a “championship contender.”

The “Zero-Compromise” Philosophy: Engineering as Art

To understand why the SF-26 is terrifying the paddock, you have to look beneath the famous red livery. In modern Formula 1, success is a game of millimeters, and Ferrari has played this hand aggressively.

The most striking feature of the new car is its “ultra-compact” engine architecture. In previous years, aerodynamicists often had to work around the bulky power unit, compromising the car’s shape to fit the engine. Not this year. For 2026, Ferrari’s engine department was given a brutal directive: make it small.

The result is a packaging miracle. The engine cover features one of the narrowest “coke bottle” structures ever seen in the paddock. This isn’t just for aesthetics. By shrinking the cooling system and packaging the engine so tightly, Ferrari has opened up vast channels of clean air to flow directly to the rear wing and diffuser. While rivals are struggling to balance cooling needs with aerodynamic drag, Ferrari has seemingly solved the puzzle. They have made the engine a “slave to aerodynamics,” prioritizing cornering speed and balance over everything else.

This compact design does double duty. It optimizes the center of gravity, a critical factor in the new, narrower 2026 chassis. It proves that Ferrari is no longer just an engine manufacturer trying to build a car; they are a cohesive design powerhouse where every department works in total unison.

The Great Suspension Gamble

If the engine packaging is a marvel, the suspension is a revolution. For years, the debate between push-rod and pull-rod suspension has dominated technical discussions. This season, Ferrari has made a definitive choice that has raised eyebrows across the pit lane.

The SF-26 has abandoned the traditional pull-rod system entirely, adopting a push-rod geometry on both the front and rear axles.

This is not a decision made lightly. It is a pure aerodynamic play. By positioning the push-rod arms higher, engineers can direct airflow from the front wing directly into the sidepod inlets and the critical underfloor Venturi ducts with surgical precision. They have even moved the front wheels forward by a few millimeters, a subtle tweak that completely optimizes how air travels over the chassis.

The goal? To push the turbulent “wake” generated by the spinning wheels away from the car’s sensitive aerodynamic zones. This decision came after thousands of hours in the wind tunnel. It suggests that Ferrari is looking for a wider operating window—a car that is easier to tune and reliable across different track surfaces, something that has plagued them in the past.

The Hamilton Factor: Braking Bad

When Lewis Hamilton announced his move to Ferrari, the world gasped. But now, we are seeing the technical impact of that transfer. One of the biggest questions was how the seven-time world champion would adapt to Ferrari’s equipment, specifically the brakes.

At Mercedes, Hamilton used Carbon Industries brakes, known for a specific feel and bite. Ferrari has been married to Brembo for 50 years. Would the British legend force a switch?

The answer is a testament to Hamilton’s adaptability and Ferrari’s commitment to him. After extensive testing and feedback, the decision was made to stay with Brembo, but with a twist. The braking system has been optimized specifically for Hamilton’s aggressive style. During the Fiorano shakedown, observers noted Hamilton stopping frequently on the start-finish straight. It wasn’t a malfunction. It was a deliberate “stop-start” test to calibrate the synchronization between the new Brembo calipers and the hybrid energy recovery system.

Every stop was data. Every launch was a lesson. Hamilton isn’t just driving the car; he is engineering it from the cockpit.

The Weight War: Ferrari’s Secret Advantage

In the new era of F1, weight is the enemy. The 2026 rules set a minimum weight limit of 768 kg. It sounds generous, but with the new hybrid systems, it is a nightmare target for engineers.

Rumors from the paddock suggest a startling reality: most teams are struggling, sitting roughly 10 kg over the limit. In a sport where 10 kg can cost three-tenths of a second per lap, that is a lifetime.

Ferrari, however, seems to have pulled a rabbit out of the hat. Reports indicate the SF-26 is hovering just a few kilograms above the minimum. This is a massive strategic advantage. While Mercedes and Red Bull may have to spend their development budget and upgrade tokens just to put their cars on a diet, Ferrari can focus purely on performance. They don’t need to make the car lighter; they just need to make it faster. This “readiness” allows them to be agile, bringing aerodynamic updates while others are still trying to shed fat.

Strategic Masterclass: The Barcelona vs. Bahrain Plan

Ferrari is also playing a long game with their testing schedule. As the Barcelona tests kick off today, don’t expect to see the full potential of the SF-26 immediately.

Ferrari is deploying a rational, gradual strategy. The car in Barcelona is an “A-spec” model—simple, robust, and focused on reliability. The goal is to check the harmony between mechanical parts and validate the wind tunnel data. They want to log thousands of kilometers without a breakdown.

The real fireworks are reserved for the Bahrain tests. That is where the aggressive aero updates and full power unit optimizations will be bolted on. By the time the lights go out in Melbourne, the car will be fully evolved. This contrasts sharply with rivals who might rush a “B-spec” car to Barcelona, risking reliability nightmares. Ferrari is building a house on a rock, not on sand.

The Rivalry: Chess in the Grey Areas

Of course, the competition is not sleeping. Mercedes has unveiled the W17 with a stunning livery, but the real story is their engine. Speculation is rife that Mercedes and Red Bull Powertrains have found a loophole regarding the compression ratio rule (set at 16.1). There are whispers that they comply in static tests but boost the ratio at high track temperatures.

Ferrari and other manufacturers are unsettled, lodging complaints with the FIA. But Ferrari isn’t waiting for a ruling. Their answer to Mercedes’ potential engine power advantage is their superior efficiency. If Mercedes has the brute force, Ferrari has the slippery shape and the tire management.

Conclusion: A Golden Age Reborn?

The 2026 season won’t just be a battle of drivers; it will be a chess match of engineers. Ferrari has placed its pawns strategically. They have removed the MGU-H, boosted electrical power to 350 kW, and redesigned their software to deploy that energy with surgical precision.

As the SF-26 takes to the track in Barcelona today, January 26th, the pieces are set. The car is light. The engine is compact. The suspension is revolutionary. And in the cockpit, they have the experience of Lewis Hamilton and the speed of Charles Leclerc.

For the first time in 20 years, Ferrari isn’t just hoping for a miracle—they have engineered one. The wait for the Tifosi might finally be over. This isn’t just a launch; it’s a ticket back to the golden age.

Safe exits from the pit.

Laurence Fox has unleashed a furious, profanity-laden rant after claiming one of his sons was vaccinated at school without his consent — announcing he has now instructed lawyers to intervene.

Laurence Fox has unleashed a furious rant claiming a school vaccinated his son without consent – while declaring he has now instructed lawyers to intervene

The controversial actor-turned-activist, 47, took to social media platform X to allege that his child had been “jabbed” without permission and left feeling unwell, branding the modern education system “evil” in an explosive outburst that quickly went viral.

Laurence, who shares two sons Winston, 16, and Eugene, 12, with his ex-wife Billie Piper, accused the unnamed school of carrying out the vaccination against his wishes and branded modern schooling ‘evil’ (pictured with Billie in 2014)

Laurence, who shares two sons — Winston, 16, and Eugene, 12 — with his ex-wife Billie Piper, accused the unnamed school of acting against his explicit wishes.

‘How dare they touch my child?’

In a conspiracy-tinged video, Laurence raged:

“How dare they touch a hair on my child’s head? Evil, evil b******s, a lot of them.”

The controversial actor-turned-activist, 47, posted a foul-mouthed meltdown alleging one of his two children was ‘jabbed’ without his permission and left ‘really ill’

He went on to claim schools were no longer places of learning, but institutions imposing ideological and medical agendas on children.

“If they’re not teaching them that they’re all racists or white-privileged, then they’re jabbing them with some experimental pharmaceutical,” he said.
“Get your kids out of the system. This is evil.”

‘He was really ill’

It is unclear whether former pop star Billie, 43, who divorced Laurence in 2016, was contacted by the school or whether she provided consent for the vaccination (seen last year)

Laurence alleged he only became aware of the vaccination after being informed his son had suffered a “horrible nosebleed,” appeared “off balance,” and looked visibly unwell.

“He looks like he’s lost half a stone,” Laurence claimed.
“He looked really f***ing ill, if I’m honest.”

Billie has previously said navigating co-parenting with Laurence amid his penchant for courting controversy, came with ‘enormous difficulty’ (pictured on their wedding day in 2007)

He said he had previously written to the school stating he did not consent to any non-emergency medical treatment.

“I said ‘No, please don’t,’ and they did it anyway,” he added.
“That is modern schooling. It’s absolutely disgusting.”

‘Sinister’ phone call claim

Laurence further alleged a teacher attempted to phone him for consent — a claim he disputed, insisting there was no record of the call on his phone.

“Where is the parent in modern Britain in 2026?” he asked.
“I am absolutely f***ing livid.”

A partial climbdown — but legal action remains

He remarried last year, tying the knot with Californian conspiracy podcaster Elizabeth Barker, who has claimed the Moon landings were faked, described 9/11 as an ‘inside job’ and dismissed climate change as a government ‘smokescreen’

In a second video posted the following morning, Laurence admitted he later discovered an email containing a consent form — which he had not opened due to email issues.

“I finally got into my emails and I found a consent form,” he said.
“I didn’t see it. I did not consent to it.”

Despite acknowledging this, he maintained schools should never proceed without explicit parental approval, confirming that he had instructed a lawyer to write formally to the school demanding answers.

Laurence also clarified he was not opposed to all vaccinations, but stressed his position was rooted in parental consent and transparency.

“I am pro parents being informed,” he said.
“And I’m against this taking place in schools, especially in a shadowy way.”

Billie Piper’s silence — and past comments

It remains unclear whether Billie Piper was contacted by the school or provided consent. Schools typically require permission from at least one parent or guardian with parental responsibility.

The Daily Mail has contacted representatives for Billie for comment.

Billie has previously spoken candidly about the difficulties of co-parenting with Laurence amid his controversies, describing it as an “enormous challenge.”

In a 2024 interview, she said:

“What is paramount for me is the privacy and anonymity of my children. They deserve their own identities.”

A controversial path

Laurence comes from one of Britain’s most famous acting dynasties — his father James Fox, brother Jack Fox, and cousins Freddie Fox and Emilia Fox.

However, in recent years he has pivoted away from acting toward political activism, founding the Reclaim Party, unsuccessfully running for London Mayor, and later joining GB News before departing after controversial remarks.

He remarried last year to Californian podcaster Elizabeth Barker, known for promoting fringe conspiracy theories.

As the debate continues, questions remain over what exactly occurred — and whether legal action will bring clarity or further controversy.

A billionaire heir has launched his own tequila company following his departure from motorsport and a controversial stint in F1

View 3 Images

Nicholas Latifi has entered the world of business since leaving F1(Image: Getty)

Former Formula One driver Nicholas Latifi has been keeping himself busy since leaving motorsport by launching his own tequila venture. The Canadian, whose father is a billionaire businessman, initially joined Williams F1 in 2020 to partner George Russell and secured 11th place in his debut race at the Australian Grand Prix.

Latifi competed in F1 for three years before Logan Sargeant took his place at the end of the 2022 season. Unfortunately, his F1 career was largely characterised by poor results and numerous DNFs – none more infamous than his crash at the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix.

The Montreal-born driver unwittingly played a pivotal role in that year’s dramatic final race when, with just over five laps remaining, he crashed his Williams at Turn 14 and brought out the safety car. Race director Michael Masi reversed his original decision to let five lapped cars separate leader Lewis Hamilton from second-placed Max Verstappen to pass

That enabled Verstappen to overtake Hamilton on fresher tyres and claim both the race victory and the championship, meaning Latifi inadvertently caused the Brit’s eighth title to be cruelly torn from his grasp.

Latifi faced widespread criticism for his involvement, which led him to issue a grovelling apology afterwards: “It was never my intention, and I can only apologise for influencing and creating an opportunity. I made a mistake. I wasn’t aware of the situation of the race up until then. Obviously, it was never my intention to inadvertently influence that, but I made a mistake and ruined my own race.”

The 30-year-old later revealed Hamilton had reached out with a supportive message, but he would last just one more season in F1. After being axed by Williams, many expected him to transition into IndyCar or another racing discipline.

However, he abandoned motorsport altogether and enrolled at London Business School in 2023, where he pursued a Master of Business Administration (MBA). He finished his MBA programme after two years and announced his graduation in 2025.

Latifi wasted no time entering the business world. Following Hamilton’s footsteps, who launched his alcohol-free Almave tequila brand in 2023, Latifi co-founded his own tequila venture, Leve Agave Spirit, in the UK last year.

View 3 Images

Latifi had to apologise to Lewis Hamilton(Image: Getty)

Updating fans in early November, Latifi posted on Instagram: “Over a year ago, along with two friends from London Business School, we set out to create a version of tequila that better fits how we drink today – socially, mindfully, and without overdoing it.

“With that mission, we created Leve, a mid-strength agave spirit (22% ABV) crafted for a lighter, smoother, more modern way of drinking, while staying true to tequila’s traditions.

“From the initial idea to product development, branding, production and now launch, it’s been an incredible ride. What started as a conversation in a classroom is now a bottle we’re holding in our hands, and soon, hopefully, you will be too. We’re just getting started in the UK, but we’re excited to finally share it with all of you.”

View 3 Images

Latifi’s crash in Abu Dhabi led to the 2021 F1 season’s controversial end(Image: Getty)

Latifi has quite a way to go before matching the achievements of his father, Michael. The 63-year-old founded and owns meat processing empire Sofina Foods and boasts a net worth of $3.5billion (£2.6bn), according to Forbes. Originally from Iran, his family moved to Canada during his teenage years, where he landed his first job at McDonald’s.

In May 2018, Latifi senior acquired roughly 10 per cent of the McLaren Group through his investment firm Nidala Limited for around £200million. Alongside his other children, Nicholas stands to inherit his wealth, which features a £160m yacht Michael bought from Aston Martin co-owner Lawrence Stroll and one of Michael Schumacher’s former Ferrari racecars.

Katie Price’s new fiancé is a twice-married man, Lee Williams, who claims to be a multimillionaire – and called his PT ex-wife ‘the perfect woman’ just 18 months ago

Katie Price has stunned fans once again — after announcing her engagement in Dubai to businessman Lee Williams, a twice-married man who has previously described his ex-wife as “the perfect woman”.

The former glamour model, 47, revealed on Friday that she is engaged for the ninth time, sharing lavish snaps of a whirlwind proposal that quickly set social media alight.

A Dubai-based lifestyle — and bold claims

But before Lee popped the question to Katie, making him her ninth fiancé, he was married for several years to Palestinian-born health and fitness coach Dina Taji, 41

Lee, originally from Manchester, has been based in Dubai for more than two decades and frequently showcases his jet-set lifestyle online.

The former glamour model, 47, shocked fans on Friday by revealing her engagement to Lee in Dubai

According to his Instagram biography, he is the CEO of Aura Group Future Urban Travel 2027 and also describes himself as an “Investor in Space X Hybrid Fitness.”

Before popping the question to Katie, however, Lee had already been married twice — most recently to Palestinian-born, Qatar-raised personal trainer Dina Taji, 41, whom he met in a Dubai gym at the start of 2020.

‘The perfect woman’

He met health and fitness coach Dina, 41, at the start of 2020, and revealed they fell in love when he they were both with other partners

Just 18 months ago, Lee was publicly gushing over Dina, sharing loved-up photos and describing her in glowing terms.

In one post, he wrote:
“Whether outside or in the office, who you share life and choose to partner with is sacred. Loving respect for this lady.”

Friends responded warmly, with one commenting: “You two are simply beautiful.”

Lee also described Dina as “a beautiful human being” and declared:
“She’s my person. I love her unconditionally.”

Falling in love — while both were with other partners

Katie showed off her giant diamond ring on her social media on Friday – blindsiding her ex JJ Slater – a week after their split was revealed

Lee later revealed that their romance began while both were in other relationships, saying they were forced to be “respectful” until circumstances allowed them to be together.

He spoke openly about his admiration for Arabic culture, saying it deeply influenced him — including fasting during Ramadan and even visiting Mecca.

The model announced her split from the MAFS star just weeks ago (pictured in March 2024)

He claimed he lived next door to a mosque and said the culture “grabbed” him, adding that he fell not just for his wife — but for her entire family.

“I didn’t just fall in love with my wife,” he said.
“I fell in love with the family package deal.”

‘The timing was flawless’

Lee described their eventual marriage as a matter of timing, insisting they brought out the best in each other and lived quietly, valuing simple moments over parties or fame.

“With Dina, I found the person I was meant to be with,” he said.
“Not just Thursday night — all of Friday.”

He also hinted that marriage had not always been easy, admitting it could sometimes feel “mundane” or “vanilla”, despite insisting there was no drama.

From ‘perfect woman’ to sudden new engagement

Despite those declarations, Lee is now engaged to Katie — a move that has raised eyebrows given the relatively short time between his previous public devotion and his latest proposal.

Katie announced the engagement just weeks after confirming her split from Married At First Sight star JJ Slater, blindsiding her ex as she proudly displayed a huge diamond ring on social media.

The proposal reportedly took place in Dubai, surrounded by red roses spelling out “Will you marry me?”, champagne, strawberries and chocolate cake.

Katie also shared a snap of Lee’s hand bearing a fresh tattoo of her name.

Katie’s engagement history

The mother-of-five has now been engaged nine times and previously married three times — to Peter Andre, Alex Reid and Kieran Hayler.

Posting from the Burj Al Arab, Katie told fans:
“Manifesting does work,” adding that her “Richard Gere” had swept her off her feet.

What happens next?

As congratulations pour in, questions are already swirling around the speed of the romance, Lee’s past marriages, and the sharp contrast between past declarations of devotion and his new future with Katie.

For now, the couple are celebrating — but as ever with Katie Price, the story is far from over.

---

It began, as so many of life’s disasters do, with confidence.

On Thursday, January 15, I woke up buoyant, smug even — Arsenal had just beaten Chelsea 3–2, Declan Rice was playing like a man worth twice his £105 million fee, and I felt annoyingly healthy after a flu-free Christmas and a golf-heavy holiday in Barbados.

History suggested this optimism was reckless.

My family has long accepted that holidays are merely elaborate warm-ups for my next injury. Over the years, I’ve broken ribs on Segways, ribs again courtesy of Brett Lee’s fast bowling, more ribs playing tennis with my son, and an ankle on the first night of a French holiday. Returning from the Caribbean unscathed felt like tempting fate.

Fate, as it turned out, was waiting in a Mayfair hotel.

---

The Five-Inch Step That Changed Everything

After a productive lunch meeting, I forgot about a small step connecting an alcove to the restaurant floor. Neil Armstrong managed “one small step for man” on the Moon. I couldn’t manage mine on Earth.

I stumbled, windmilled, and hit the floor like a collapsing tower block.

The pain was instant and spectacular — my hip and thigh felt as though they’d been set alight. I lay there, sweating, trying to maintain dignity while wondering whether a man can actually die of embarrassment.

Initial medical checks were reassuring. Nothing broken, they thought.

Then the X-ray arrived.

The doctor stared at the screen and sighed.
“Oh no…”

Two words you never want to hear from anyone in a white coat.

“You’ve fractured the neck of your femur,” he said. “Bad break. You’ll either need it repaired… or a new hip.”

A new hip. At 60. From tripping in a restaurant.

---

Surgery, Statistics — and Staring at Mortality

The choice was grim but clear: repair the hip and spend three months on crutches with a 30 per cent chance it would fail — or replace it now with a 95 per cent success rate and a faster recovery.

I chose the new hip.

Being wheeled into theatre focuses the mind. I’d discovered the mortality rate for hip replacements is just 0.3 per cent — reassuring, until you realise that still means 300 people a year don’t come back.

If that sounds paranoid, consider the odds of fracturing your femur in a five-star hotel restaurant.

Anaesthesia solved that anxiety in under two minutes.

I woke late that night to the reassuring words: “The operation went very well.”

Hip, hip, hoorah.

---

Hospital Life, Humour — and Hard Truths

The days that followed were a blur of morphine, physiotherapy, and visitors.

My sons arrived to watch Arsenal with me, mercilessly quoting Rocky Balboa about life beating you to your knees. Friends flooded in with messages: Gordon Brown, Rishi Sunak, Joan Collins, Rod Stewart — all offering support, advice, and, in Joan’s case, stern instructions never to skimp on physio.

The nurses, many from war-torn countries, quietly reminded me how trivial my complaints were. Perspective arrived daily, uninvited.

Social media, predictably, went feral. Rumours of imminent death were swiftly countered by me announcing the injury myself — which only made it global news. Apparently, my hip made headlines in India.

I blame Arsenal.

---

The Humbling Reality of Recovery

Going home was both welcome and brutal. Cats indifferent. Crutches ugly. Pride dented.

At 4am one morning, I discovered I’d left my grabber out of reach, removed my socks, and rendered myself completely helpless — forced to wake my wife and ask her to put my socks on.

There are moments that stay with you.
This was one of them.

---

A Final Lesson (Reluctantly Learned)

Breaking a hip falling over in a restaurant is not a glamorous story. Even Genesis guitarist Mike Rutherford, who broke his skiing, agreed mine was worse.

But here’s the truth: this week frightened me. It made me feel old for the first time. It reminded me how quickly strength vanishes, how suddenly life humbles you, and how essential it is not to wallow.

As D.H. Lawrence wrote:
“I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself.”

So I’ll do the physio. I’ll endure the pain. And I’ll aim to be fit enough for Arsenal’s title run — because nothing motivates recovery like the prospect of victory parades.

My physio arrived smiling yesterday, announcing:
“I’m the luckiest man in Britain — I get to hurt Piers Morgan for months.”

The long road back has begun.

And next time I see a five-inch step?
I’m taking the long way round.