Blog

King Charles disclosed his cancer diagnosis in February, following his treatment for a benign prostate condition.

A new royal biography states Queen Camilla was against the King disclosing his cancer diagnosis (Image: Getty)

A new royal biography states Queen Camilla was initially against King Charles’s decision to disclose his cancer diagnosis to the public but was “overruled”.

The monarch, 75, talked about his health openly when he announced he was undergoing treatment for a benign prostate condition in January of this year at The London Clinic.

Then, in February, it was announced he had been diagnosed with an undisclosed form of cancer, which was discovered during the procedure.

Buckingham Palace revealed at the time: “No further details are being shared at this stage, except to confirm that His Majesty does not have prostate cancer.”

In the new book titled ‘Catherine, the Princess of Wales’ by Robert Jobson, the author writes: “Queen Camilla had initially been against disclosing his condition, but the King overruled her as he felt it was a chance to take a lead and in doing so to encourage men experiencing similar symptoms to seek timely medical attention.”

King Charles and Queen Camilla met patients living with cancer earlier this year (Image: Getty)

However, the reason behind Camilla disagreeing with Charles’s decision has not been disclosed in the book. Following the King’s announcement, there was a “significant increase in searches” related to “enlarged prostate” on the National Health Service website.

Jobson wrote: “The NHS England page on benign prostate enlargement had more than 26,000 visits in the 48 hours after the announcement, compared to a daily average of just 1,400.”

Analysis by NHS England, which runs the NHS website, found visits to the prostate enlargement page jumped to one visit every five seconds the week the news of the King’s health condition was released.

The national clinical director for NHS England at the time said: “Benign prostate enlargement is common in men over the age of 50 and you would expect around 70-80% over the age of 75 to have an enlarged prostate.”

“Many men worry that having an enlarged prostate means they have an increased risk of developing prostate cancer but this isn’t the case. Help is available and there are a number of tests that can be done to rule out cancer.”

King Charles is the patron of several cancer charities (Image: Getty)

The royal author also claims Charles wanted to avoid the “fake news” which often circulated whenever the late Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip received medical attention.

Speaking about the King’s decision, Robert added: “He was lauded for doing so, with commentators saying he had ushered in a new era of transparency in matters of health and the Royal Family.”

It has been a tumultuous year for the Royal Family, as the Princess of Wales also revealed in an emotional video in March that she had been diagnosed with cancer and was undergoing chemotherapy.

Princess Kate, however, has since made two official royal appearances this year, including Trooping the Colour, the King’s official birthday parade, and the Wimbledon Men’s Final, as patron of the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club.

Duchess Sophie visited the La Galerie Dior in Paris but fans couldn’t help notice the heeled wedges she accompanied with her Victoria Beckham dress.

Duchess Sophie attended the Dior gallery in Paris after the Olympics (Image: agedorgallery)

Duchess Sophie became victim to the fashion police after she visited the La Galerie Dior in Paris after attending the Olympic Games.

The Duchess of Edinburgh wore a Floral-Print Chiffon Midi Dress by Victoria Beckham with a V-shaped neckline but it wasn’t the dress that offended.

The 59-year-old paired the flattering waist-accentuating dress with Penelope Chilvers heeled wedges.

The royal, married to Prince Edward, completed the look with a pair of gold drop earrings by Giulia Barela.

But people couldn’t get over the wedges. Instagram account Royal Fashion Police shared an image of the Duchess’s looks, with users expressing their contempt.

The Duchess of Edinburgh wore a Victoria Beckham dress with the heeled wedges (Image: agedorgallery)

One person said the look was “painfully basic” while another wrote: “hoping some style rubs off”, and “these shoes make no sense at all and they are too white”.

Others were more measured, with one person saying: “The dress is beautiful, Sophie looks lovely. But she has ruined the whole look with those shoes. Totally inappropriate. Fine for popping to the shops but not for this occasion”.

Meanwhile, another said: “The dress is so pretty and Sophie is representing classic British style. The look, paired with sporty footwear, is a bit casual for a private tour by Dior officials. Bet she thoroughly enjoyed it though!”.

 

Royal fans said the look was ‘painfully basic’ (Image: agedorgallery)

Not everyone hated the look, with one fan writing: “The dress is beautiful and really suits the Duchess of Edinburgh. Maybe a more stylish shoe. However I’m sure she was super comfortable and let’s face it, as we get older comfort is what counts.”

But clearly, the Duchess paid no mind to the critics as she rewore the controversial shoes when she posed for a photo with Menna Rawlings, HM Ambassador to France and Monaco, at the grand entryway of L’hôtel De Charost.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle latest interview about cyberbullying has reportedly raised some eyebrows in California.

Meghan and Harry were recently interview about cyberbullying for CBS (Image: CBS)

Meghan Markle is said to have been left reeling after Chrissy Teigen’s “awkward online history” undercuts her latest interview for CBS.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were recently interviewed to discuss cyberbullying and how to protect children from online abuse, with a sit-down chat airing last Sunday – Meghan’s 43rd birthday – on CBS.

However, as reported by the Daily Mail’s Richard Eden, Meghan could likely have been left red-faced after her friend’s past of sending a string of abusive messages to teenagers online.

The messages, which were not revealed until years later, included hurtful comments such as, “I can’t wait for you to die” and “I hate you”.

After the messages became public, Ms Teigan – who is married to singer John Legend – was later forced to apologise to the youngsters.

Discussing the incident, Mr Eden wrote in the latest Palace Confidential column: “[Chrissy] didn’t apologise until a decade later, after the messages had been made public, resulting in numerous brands, including Bloomingdale’s luxury department store chain, dropping her.

“Apparently, this wasn’t a big issue for Meghan, who sent Teigan a jar of her American Riviera Orchard jam earlier this year.”

Following the launch of Meghan’s brand, the mother of two sent a jar of the jam to 50 frends and influencers – including Chrissy, fashion designer Tracy Robbins and socialite Delfina Blaquier.

Taking to social media back in April, Chrissy shared how she devoured the jam – opting to pair it with rustic bread, triple cream brie and thick-cut bacon.

Chrissy Teigan was previously forced to apologise for hurling onling abuse at teenagers (Image: GETTY)

In the emotional interview, Meghan shared her own experience of having suicidal thoughts during her time as a senior working royal.

The mother of two told host Jane Pauley: “When you’ve been through any level of pain or trauma, I believe part of our healing journey – certainly part of mine – is being able to be really open about it.

“I really scraped the surface on my experience, but I do think that I would never want someone else to feel that way and I would never want someone else to be making those sort of plans and I would never want someone else to not be believed.”

She added: “If me voicing what I have overcome will save someone or encourage someone in their life to really, genuinely check in on them and not assume that the appearance is good so everything is okay, then that’s worth it. I’ll take a hit for that.”

Princess Beatrice borrowed one of the late Queen’s dresses for her wedding, but the monarch also lent her something rather special.

Princess Beatrice borrowed two things from the late Queen (Image: PA)

She may have been the longest-reigning monarch to us but to Princess Beatrice, the late Queen was a grandmother.

And as one might expect during a wedding, the grandmother came through with tradition, giving the princess ‘something borrowed’.

Princess Beatrice had planned to wear a custom dress for her wedding but considering it was during lockdown in 2020, the royal had to make last-minute changes due to designer issues.

Beatrice asked the Queen if she could borrow an original Norman Hartnell evening dress for the occasion and she obliged.

Showing just how close the grandmother-granddaughter duo were, the Queen also let Beatrice borrow another special item – the Fringe Tiara – which she inherited from her grandmother, Queen Mary, after she died in 1953.

Princess Beatrice’s wedding took place under coronavirus restrictions (Image: PA)

Princess Beatrice followed royal tradition as two other brides have worn the Fringe Tiara on their wedding day, including the Queen and Princess Anne.

The jewel comes with a hefty price tag too, coming in at an estimated £4m.

Daena Borrowman, Marketing Manager at jewellery box, told Express.co.uk: “Created on the commission of the Queen’s grandmother, Queen Mary’s Fringe Tiara, which doubles up as a necklace, is now worth more than £4 million.

“It consists of diamonds set in gold and silver fashioned into 47 graduated rose-set tapering bars, separated by 46 narrow spikes.

“The diamonds in the tiara were originally part of a necklace that Queen Victoria gifted to Queen Mary on the occasion of her wedding.

Princess Beatrice modified one of the late Queen’s dresses for her wedding (Image: PA)

“The then-Princess Elizabeth wore it on her wedding day when it snapped as she was getting ready and it had to be rushed to Garrard’s to be fixed.”

While the Fringe Tiara is one of the most expensive jewels worn by royal brides, another one, worn by a different granddaughter comes with an even more expensive price tag.

Princess Beatrice’s younger sister Eugenie actually wore the Greville Emerald Kokoshnik Tiara when she married Jack Brooksbank in 2018.

Miss Borrowman added: “A tiara as iconic as this one could be worth anything in the range of £5 million and £10 million.”

“The rose-cut pave diamond and emerald tiara is set in platinum, adorned by six small emeralds and one large central cabochon emerald of around 93.7 carats.”

The Princess of Wales will likely be heading up north soon, according to royal sources amid her ongoing cancer treatment.

Princess Kate will likely be heading up north this summer (Image: Getty)

The Princess of Wales is expected to make her “longest journey” yet since announcing she had been diagnosed with cancer, as the future Queen is set to join the rest of the royals in Scotland.

Princess Kate has not travelled a lot this year, unless necessary, as she undergoes preventative chemotherapy for an unspecified type of cancer.

Now royal sources told the Mail that Kate will likely join her husband, Prince William and their three children, Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis as they head to Balmoral Castle with the rest of the Firm for their annual summer break.

The Royal Family traditionally travel to the Scottish Highlands every summer to relax in the peaceful countryside.

Kate has largely kept away from the public gaze this year, making only two appearances, one in June for Trooping the Colour and a second one in July for the Wimbledon finals.

Princess Kate and Prince William on West Sands beach in in St Andrews, Scotland in 2021 (Image: Getty)

Both events took place in London, which is roughly an hour’s drive from Windsor, where she lives with her family.

Balmoral Castle in Aberdeenshire, on the other hand, is 510 miles away from Adelaide Cottage which could take around nine hours to travel.

The latest news can be seen as the princess making “good progress” with her cancer treatment, the report stressed.

Back in March, the future Queen broke the nation’s heart when she bravely announced in an emotional video message that she had been diagnosed with cancer, following a major abdominal surgery in January.

 

The Waleses in Scotland in 2022 (Image: Getty)

In her latest update regarding her health, the night before the Trooping the Colour ceremony, Kate revealed her innermost thoughts and said she’s “not out of the woods yet”.

The Princess of Wales opened up about how she has “good days and bad days” and said her treatment will be ongoing for a few more months.

She said: “I am making good progress, but as anyone going through chemotherapy will know, there are good days and bad days.

“I am learning how to be patient, especially with uncertainty. Taking each day as it comes, listening to my body, and allowing myself to take this much-needed time to heal.”

 

PAY ALL YOUR BILLS, CHEATERS! Tre Lune Restaurant Owner Accuses Meghan of Using Harry’s Prince Title to Delay Her $2,000 Food Bill

Meghan Markle Faces Backlash Over Unpaid Restaurant Bill and Alleged Abusive Behavior

Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, recently found herself at the center of controversy after an incident at Tre Luna, an upscale restaurant, where she allegedly mistreated staff and left without paying a $2,000 bill. The restaurant’s owner publicly called her out for her behavior, leading to a permanent ban and reigniting discussions about her public image and past incidents of perceived entitlement.

The incident unfolded during what was supposed to be a celebratory birthday dinner for Meghan. However, according to witnesses and staff, her behavior quickly turned the event into a chaotic and uncomfortable affair. Meghan reportedly micromanaged the staff, made unreasonable demands, and displayed an attitude starkly different from her usual public persona. Her actions surprised both the restaurant employees and her friends who were present.

As the dinner progressed, tensions escalated, culminating in a heated confrontation over the bill. Meghan accused the restaurant of attempting to overcharge her, leading to a dispute that ended with her leaving without settling the bill. The restaurant’s management, citing their zero-tolerance policy for abusive behavior, decided to ban Meghan from the establishment permanently.

Witnesses described the scene as bizarre, noting the stark contrast between the intended festive atmosphere and Meghan’s outbursts. Her emotional distress was evident, creating an uncomfortable environment for everyone involved. The fallout from the incident was immediate, with the restaurant issuing a statement emphasizing the importance of maintaining a safe and respectful environment for their staff.

The owner of Tre Luna expressed shock and disappointment over Meghan’s behavior, stating that no customer, regardless of their status, should treat staff abusively or refuse to pay their bill. The decision to ban Meghan has sparked widespread local reactions, with many expressing support for the restaurant’s stance on maintaining decorum and respect.

This incident has further fueled the ongoing debate about Meghan’s public image. Some defend her actions, suggesting she may have been under significant stress, while others point to a pattern of entitlement and unreasonable demands. This latest controversy could potentially strain her already tenuous relationship with the British royal family, as public perception continues to shift.

Meghan’s reputation, already marred by various public and media skirmishes, has taken another hit. The narrative of entitlement and mistreatment of staff does little to help her efforts to maintain a positive public image. As discussions about her behavior and the incident at Tre Luna continue, it remains to be seen how this will impact her and Prince Harry’s standing both in the UK and internationally.

In conclusion, the Tre Luna incident has cast a shadow over Meghan Markle’s birthday celebrations, highlighting troubling aspects of her behavior and reigniting public discourse about her character. The fallout serves as a reminder of the challenges public figures face in maintaining their image and the scrutiny they are under, especially when their actions do not align with their public personas.

Former Loose Women star Carol McGiffin and Mark Cassidy decided to marry in secret 10 years into their relationship

Former Loose Women panellist Carol McGiffin is in talks with her husband Mark Cassidy about renewing their vows.

The couple met back in 2008 at the Loose Women wrap party when Mark was 26 and Carol was 48.

10 years later, they decided to marry in secret in Bangkok, Thailand, which “upset” a few loved ones.

Addressing her relationship in a new interview, Carol, 64, has shared that while their 22-year age gap can “bother” her at times, they remain happily married and have proved the haters wrong.

She told Woman’s Own Magazine: “Initially, the papers were saying, ‘Give it five minutes’ so it’s nice to be able to prove everybody wrong.

Carol McGiffin and Mark Cassidy met at a Loose Women party when she was a panellist and he was a producer ( 
Image:
INSTAGRAM/CAROLMCGIFFIN)
“But it’s not about that, it has nothing to do with anybody else. We’re still here.”

On renewing their vows, she added: “We have talked about it. When we tied the knot, it was very under the radar.

“Quite a few people were upset that we got married without them!”

Carol’s latest words come after she previously slammed those who renew their vows as being “ridiculous”.

She told The Sun: “I don’t know why people do that. It’s so ridiculous.

“We didn’t really do it properly. For the anniversary, we always go out, but hopefully we are going to be back to the place where we got married, which is Bangkok.

“It will be just us two like it was at our wedding, and no one else there. We never would have done it otherwise.”

Carol McGiffin said she and Mark Cassidy have discussed renewing their vows, after previously branding those who did it ‘ridiculous’ ( 
Image:
GETTY)
The pair have been living in the south of France since 2016, after they fell in love with a property listed online.

While on Loose Women, the broadcaster would commute twice a month for the show in London, up until her departure.

Carol decided to take a step back from the ITV programme last year after claiming she didn’t fit in.

She first appeared on the show from 2000 until her first departure in 2013, and then again from 2018 until 2023.

“Someone, somewhere will be offended by absolutely everything. I’d rather not be on a show that panders to that. It’s boring,” she recently shared.

“And I won’t be told what I can or can’t say.”

On Wednesday’s instalment of Loose Women, the ITV panellists spoke to presenter Mel Giedroyc about her upcoming reality show.

Former Bake Off star Mel Giedroyc was less than impressed with one member of the studio audience when appearing on Loose Women.

During Wednesday’s show, the 56-year-old was speaking about holidays as Kaye Adams questioned if she’d been away with friend and former co-star Sue Perkins.

She replied: “We did! We did our one and only skiing holiday together when we were 30, we’d been nagged by a really good friend of ours, who is a very good skier-”

However, someone in the live studio audience seemed to grab her attention as she was quick to point them out.

Mel said: “You can stop yawning in the front row now!” The panel and audience burst into laughter as Mel tried to continue on with her holiday tale.

Mel was quick to call out someone in the audience

She continued: “This is a very good and exciting story about Sue and I going skiing together 26 years ago, thank you.”

Making it clear to the person she was joking, Mel called them lovely before adding: “It is a boring story, I’ll give you that!”

Carrying on with the holiday story, Mel revealed that she and Sue were the only two people on the trip who were in ski school as their friends were all experienced.

Mel said: “Now, I don’t want to be smug, but I was quite good.”

Mel made it clear she was joking with the people in the audience
Questioning whether or not Sue was any good, Mel confessed her friend was terrible, prompting the audience to burst out laughing.

She added: “It was probably really annoying but I was going, ‘Wahey’ and going down the slopes, and poor old Perks’ was not.

“She was cross, she was cross with me. I’m competitive, the two of us are competitive so it was awks. We laugh about it a lot now.”

The 56-year-old told the Loose Women panel she doesn’t think people will see Sue on the ski slopes anytime soon.

Mel and Sue have been friends for many yearsTalking about their long-running friendship, Mel had nothing but kind words to say as she told Kaye “I love her!”

Elsewhere in the show, the former Bake Off star touched on menopause with the panellist as Mariella Frostrup asked how it’s been for her.

Immediately saying it was “terrible”, Mel added: “Well no, that’s a bit dramatic”

When asked if she was on HRT, Mel confessed she was using a gel along with pills to handle her symptoms.

She quipped: “Gelling is great, I love my gel time!”

Loose Women ladies enjoyed a rare night out together as they tucked into a delicious roast dinner before enjoying games and some fizz to toast the festive season

Loose Women fans have shared their concern after Stacey Solomon failed to feature in a team snap for the show’s Christmas lunch.

The TV presenters from the ITV the day-time talk show were treated to a swanky knees up as Loose Women panelists Charlene White, 42, shared some snaps of the gang celebrating with festive feast.

The Loose Women who could be seen in the shot around a huge dining table included: Katie Piper, 39, Christine Lampard, 43, Linda Robson, 64, Nadia Sawalha, 58, Jane Moore, 60, Dame Kelly Holmes, 52, Frankie Bridge, 33 and Judi Love, 42.

They were joined by some of the production crew with journalist Charlene hinting her ‘boss’ was also at the team outing.

Charlene told fans: “There are SEVERAL videos I can’t post from today’s Loose Women Christmas lunch (I am the lady from the News obvs.

Loose Women stars enjoy a Christmas bash ( 
Image:
Charlene White/Instagram)

Presenters Judy Love, Frankie Bridge and Jane Moore enjoy the party ( 
Image:
Judi Love/Instagram)
“And some things must be kept between friends and colleagues)… however, the @loosewomen team creating a dance routine for the Birds Of A Feather theme tune in honour of @lindarobson58 is one of the few videos I can post.”

But, fans of the show took to Twitter after spotting panelist Stacey was not attending he event inferring she may have left the show.

One wrote on an Instagram picture posted by Judi: “Wheres @staceysolomon.”

The Loose Women gang dressed to impress for the glam get together ( 
Image:
loosewomen/Instagram)

Coleen Nolan beams back at the camera alongside Linda Robson ( 
Image:
Charlene White/Instagram)But the mum-of-four wasn’t the only person missing – Kelle Bryan, Denise Welch, Janet Street Porter, Carol McGiffin and Brenda Edwards were also not pictured at the event.

And a quick scroll of Stace’s own IG shows she had actually opted for a late night spot of supermarket shopping.

Stacey, who recently fronted her own Christmas craft show on BBC One, shared a video clip of her shopping trip as she wandered the aisles.

Speaking to her followers, she explained: “I’m just not sleeping very well at the minute, so I was laying there and I thought ‘oh just get up Stace, so I’ve come to do a food shop.

“And now I’m just walking round eating everything, I’m only going to have packets left when I go to the checkout. I won’t have any actual food.

Stacey Solomon with her colleagues, Katie Piper, Nadia Sawalha and Kaye Adams ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)“Maybe I’m not sleeping because I’m just hungry, probably should have had a bowl of cereal rather than going for a shop.”

Stacey panned her phone so she could share the contents of her trolley which true to her confession did feature festive food such as cheese and crackers and flowers.

Clearly enjoying the trip she continued: “Would it be okay to just sit in the bread aisle, inhale the smell and crack these open? [laughing emoji]”.

Loose Women’s Janet Street-Porter and Brenda Edwards had a fiery exchange while discussing Jeremy Clarkson’s suggestion that Meghan Markle should be ‘paraded naked through the streets’

The Loose Women panel were involved in a fierce clash today over Jeremy Clarkson’s vile Meghan Markle comments.

The former Top Gear host, 62, has been condemned for suggesting the Duchess, 41, should be ‘paraded naked through the streets’, adding he ‘dreamed’ of people throwing ‘lumps of excrement’ at the mum-of-two

While admitting she was ‘repulsed’ by the comments, Janet Street-Porter, 75, said she didn’t believe Jeremy had broken the law because his remarks didn’t constitute “hate speech”.

Telling the audience we need free speech in the country, she said: “it seems like we’ve moved on to cancelling” saying “two or three hundred years ago there were cartoons of the king with his head down the toilet or with his bits hanging out.”

Janet added the Clarkson’s Farm star had taken the reference of being ‘paraded naked through the streets’ from HBO’s Game of Thrones. During the shocking scene Cersei Lannister, played by Lena Headey, is forced to undertake the ‘walk of atonement’ – naked – for her sins.

But panellist Brenda Edwards said it didn’t make a jot of difference where the reference came from.

Janet Street Porter didn’t think Jeremy’s comments were ‘hate speech’ ( 
Image:
ITV)
She said Jeremy’s comments absolutely warranted hate speech, saying his suggestion to throw excrement at the Duchess “incited hate.

“It doesn’t matter if it’s a man or a woman, she said. “It’s horrible. All she [Meghan] did was fall in love.”

The star added: “Woe betide someone say that to his [Jeremy’s] daughter.”

Brenda Edwards said Jeremy’s comments ‘incited hate’ ( 
Image:
ITV)
Jeremy’s daughter Emily, 28, condemned her father’s comments, taking to to social media to ‘make it clear’ she stands in support of ‘those targeted with online hatred, following the disturbing rant.

Addressing her 268,000 Instagram followers, she said: “My views are and have always been clear when it comes to misogyny, bullying and the treatment of women by the media.

They didn’t agree ( 
Image:
ITV)
“I want to make it very clear that I stand against everything that my dad wrote about Meghan Markle and I remain standing in support of those that are targeted with online hatred.”

At the end of the Loose Women debate, host Christine Lampard said it was important to “be kind” adding the #bekind movement seemed to have been forgotten about in Jeremy’s comments.

The Grand Tour star made the vile remarks after Harry & Meghan dropped on Netflix.

Meghan Markle was the subject of a vile rant by the former Top Gear host ( 
Image:
getty)

Jeremy has been condemned for the shocking rant ( 
Image:
Getty Images)The bombshell documentary has ruffled more than a few feathers, but Jeremy sparked a huge outcry after declaring he ‘hated’ Meghan on a “cellular level”.

Apparently livid with the mum-of-two, the presenter shared his fantasy about the Suits star being “paraded naked through the streets” where he “dreams of people throwing lumps of excrement at her”.

The post was slammed by many, including Carol Vorderman, who tweeted: “NO Jeremy Clarkson. Not on any level, in any circumstance, is it ok to write this stuff about any woman & absolutely NO to ‘everyone who’s my age thinks the same’ No no no. We absolutely do NOT think the same. Listen to the noise Jeremy. The crowds are chanting ‘shame on YOU’.”