Blog

During Thursday’s episode of Loose Women, Denise Welch and her co-stars watched a clip of The 1975 frontman Matthew Healy singing a heartfelt song about Denise’s battle with depression

Brenda Edwards became visibly emotional on Thursday’s Loose Women as she watched a clip of Denise Welch ‘s son singing.

Matthew Healy is the singer of the band The 1975 and wrote a song called She Lays Down about his mother’s depression.

During a discussion on the latest edition of the ITV show, Denise, 64, chatted with her co-stars Kaye Adams, Coleen Nolan and Brenda about whether or not you should tell your children when you’re ill.

Referring to her past mental health problems, Denise said: “Matthew was used to mum being very poorly in bed. but it’s interesting when kids grow up, how what you tell them and how they’ve processed it manifests.

Denise Welch spoke openly about her depression on Thursday’s Loose Women

“Obviously with my eldest child, he’s a singer and songwriter, and in this instance he wrote a song called She Lays Down and it’s basically… I told him when he was older and he could understand it, that depression robs you of the ability to love and I said that I used to lie down on the bedroom floor, and I’m not religious, but pray to whatever to help me to be able to love my child again.

“And that’s why he wrote ‘She Lays Down’,” Denise continued as she read out some of the lyrics to the song.

Brenda Edwards was visibly emotional as the panel watched a clip of Denise’s son Matty Healy singing a song about her
Kaye, 59, then asked Denise if it was okay if they played a clip of 33-year-old Matty singing the song.

As the video was played, the camera panned to both Denise and Brenda watching it, both with very sombre faces.

When the camera cut back to the studio, Denise said: “That’s really emotional isn’t it? Wow, I don’t think I’ve ever seen that clip.”

Brenda’s son Jamal Edwards sadly died earlier this year ( 
Image:
ITV)

Brenda had her back slightly turned away from the camera, and noticing that her friend was upset, Denise reached out a hand to comfort Brenda – who lost her son Jamal earlier this year.

Giving Brenda time to compose herself, Coleen picked up the conversation and said: “It’s good that Matty was able to express it in music and words coz some kids don’t have that.”

‘So many wonderful memories come flooding back when I think back to our wedding preparations 25 years ago.

I love you so much,’ Mrs Becks captioned a series of photos revealing the moments leading up to their wedding in the summer of 1999.

In the first photo, the fashion designer said she and Becks were checking the dimensions of two ‘throne’ chairs.

‘I loved it from the start,’ Vic captioned the photo, smiling brightly as she tried on the unwrapped chair.

Becks held little Brooklyn on the plane with his mother-in-law and two sisters-in-law to Ireland on July 2, two days before the main wedding.

The bride Victoria’s wedding dress took up a lot of space on the plane.

The former pop singer posted a moment when her husband-to-be focused on writing his vows. Becks and Vic dated since 1997, and got engaged in early 1998. The two came together when she was the singer of the famous Spice Girls and he was a handsome and talented midfielder for the MU and England teams. The love affair attracted the attention of the media in the foggy country and the world. 1999 was a year of great success for Becks in both his career and personal life when he won the Silver Ball, won the treble with MU, got married and had children.

‘One of the last wedding dress adjustments’, Vic wrote. She sent thanks to designer Vera Wang for making the wedding dress a reality and the corset manufacturer that helped her tighten her waist.

Unique wedding cake with two nude mannequins made of fondant decorated on top.

Vic mentioned designer Antonio Berardi when captioning a photo of a tailor attaching flowers to the shoulders to complete the purple dress before the wedding day.

‘How many people does it take to get two big ‘throne’ chairs into a small plane?’, Vic captioned a photo of the couple and the crew trying to get the chairs onto the plane to the wedding venue.

On Instagram Story, Vic posted a few more photos while preparing for the wedding, including a moment when Becks and 4-month-old Brooklyn wore purple tuxedos. The 50-year-old designer also posted a cheerful photo of herself trying on her wedding dress.

After reminiscing about their wedding day 25 years ago, the Becks returned to reality. ‘Just the three of us at home watching TV. Perfect ending to a special day,’ Vic wrote.

After 25 years of marriage, the Becks have 4 children, of which the three eldest sons are all grown up and have started their own independent lives. Their youngest daughter Harper, who is about to turn 13, still lives with her parents.

Denise Welch was accused of ‘shouting’ by Gloria Hunniford on Tuesday’s Loose Women as the panel had a very tense discussion about Meghan Markle and the royal family

Denise Welch clashed with her Loose Women co-stars on Tuesday’s show as they discussed Meghan Markle and the royal family.

The latest instalment of the iTV show saw Denise joined by Jane Moore, Brenda Edwards and Gloria Hunniford on the panel.

As Jane opened up the discussion about Meghan’s most recent interview with The Cut, Denise was keen to have her say.

“I think my views are quite clear. I think that Meghan Markle can’t do nothing right and hasn’t been able to… to live in a world where she denigrated so badly every single day…”

Gloria joined in on the conversation and said: “I respected the fact that they wanted a bit of privacy, but now, privacy to me is you go to a different country and you do not do Oprah Winfrey, do every magazine, do all sorts of deals with Netflix…”

Denise Welch clashed with her Loose Women co-stars on Tuesday’s show as they discussed Meghan Markle and the royal family ( 
Image:
ITV)
“I disagree!” Denise butted in as Gloria reprimanded her and said: “No come on, there’s no point shaking your head,” but Denise repeated herself and commented: “I disagree Gloria!”

Gloria fired back: “But just let me finish! It’s a point that she did tell some – what was discovered – as fibs, lies, whatever you want to call them, in that Oprah Winfrey interview…”

Jane Moore led the discussion on Meghan Markle but Denise was keen to have her say ( 
Image:
ITV)
“What and the royal family have never told any lies or fibs either? I think there’s some whoppers we’re not allowed to talk about but anyway…” Denise butted in.

“Come on Denise, hang on, you had your say,” Gloria responded, before adding: “The thing is, I admire the Queen and I admire the Royal Family, and I just think Meghan undermines all the good work that she does by spinning out these lies…”

Gloria Hunniford accused Denise of ‘shouting’ at her during the discussion ( 
Image:
ITV)

At this point, Denise became very frustrated as she raised her voice and said: “The Queen supports Prince Andrew, Gloria! The Queen doesn’t say a word about Prince Andrew!”

“See you can’t do this without shouting,” Gloria said calmly, as Denise argued: “I’m not shouting at you, I’m shouting generally.”

Loose Women viewers were torn over Denise’s behaviour and took to Twitter to comment.

One person fumed “Denise is a disgrace. How dare she talk to Gloria in that way #LooseWomen.”

Another tweeted: “#LooseWomen disgusting behaviour, Denise does not know how to discuss, shouting showing no respect to Gloria, everyone is allowed an opinion, shutting others up by shouting over them is bullying!”

Someone else supporting Denise wrote: “I love Denise ! She’s fair and unbiased #LooseWomen.”

A different viewer posted: “#LooseWomen Denise loses her point when she gets emotional, and by not allowing others to speak arguably she is bullying. All her points are valid.”

Kelle Bryan, Janet Street-Porter and Jane Moore had a very tense discussion about Meghan Markle and the royal family on Loose Women

The Loose Women studio descended into furious debate for the second day running on Wednesday afternoon, as the panellists discussed Meghan Markle ’s latest tell-all interview.

Host Jane Moore was joined on the panel by Sophie Morgan, Kelle Bryan and Janet Street-Porter as they discussed the former actress’s comparison of her wedding with Prince Harry to Nelson Mandela being freed from prison.

The former Suits actress recalled an encounter she had at the 2019 London premiere with an actor from South Africa who made a comparison to her wedding with Prince Harry and Nelson Mandela.

Panellists Jane and Janet took issue with the comparison, but Kelle defended Meghan’s comments, resulting in a loud clash in the ITV studio.

The conversation turned heated as the focus turned to Meghan’s comments about her two children Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana and the lives they could have led in the UK.

Kelle defended Meghan’s comments ( 
Image:
ITV)
Janet said to Kelle: “You seem to be implying that the British people by default would think less of her son and think badly of her son because he’s a person of colour and mixed race.”

Kelle hit back insisting: “That’s her experience. She said within the royal household people have made comments about her son as a person of colour.

“If that’s the first representation she’s had, what’s she thinking about as a wider community outside. Racism is something we deal with on a daily basis.”

Jane then said: “There’s racism in America as well though,” to which Kelle agreed there was.

Sophie scathingly said: “It’s just so boring talking about Meghan Markle” ( 
Image:
ITV)
Janet then stepped in and said: “What I find ironic is that she left this country because she complained of having her privacy invaded and she’s crossed to another continent where now in the space of a week we’ve had two podcasts and a 6,000 word interview.”

Kelle then raised the “confines” on Meghan’s life while a part of the royal family, as she had to shout over her fellow panellists to say: “She couldn’t receive her mail without somebody else reading it.”

The panel then inexplicably burst into laughter at the comment, as Janet said: “I think I’m not allowed to receive my mail on this show without someone reading it.”

Kelle then tried to regain the conversation as she interjected: “Hang on a second, wait” ( 
Image:
ITV)Kelle then tried to regain the conversation as she interjected: “Hang on a second, wait,” before Sophie finally piped up to weigh in on the conversation.

She scathingly said: “It’s just so boring talking about Meghan Markle – but I get all the points raised.”

She continued: “We’re pulling out things that’s being said. It’s a shame when she knows she’s being scrutinised for things she says that she still says things that potentially detract from her agenda.

“She wants to manage her voice and her truth, but she should be aware she compares herself to Mandela, it’s going to get scrutinised.”

The ITV daytime show has been delayed while the nation waited with bated breath to find out who Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s successor would be

Today’s instalment of Loose Women has been delayed while the nation waited with bated breath to find out who would be next to get their hands on the keys to No. 10.

Liz Truss was today named the next Conservative leader and Britain’s PM.

Foreign Secretary Truss takes over from scandal-hit Boris Johnson with former Chancellor Sunak having signalled that he believed he had lost ahead of the announcement, saying his job “now is just to support a Conservative government”.

While the Pound has fallen to its lowest level in over 30 years, Truss takes power at a time when Brits face a cost of living crisis, industrial unrest and a recession and takes the reins from a PM who was forced to announce his resignation in July after months of scandal.

And the announcement of her leadership comes at the price of Monday’s Loose Women episode.

Liz Truss won by the tightest margin in Tory history ( 
Image:
Getty Images)
Daytime telly fans were left disappointed as This Morning presenters Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield informed fans that they would be staying on air passed their usual 12.30pm cut off for a special extension ahead of the new PM announcement.

Loose Women was set to return to screens with a live audience today for the first time in two-and-a-half years, but the eager fans have been left waiting in the studio while Truss was crowned.

The Loose ladies are set to be joined by Julia Bradbury, one year on from her mastectomy.

She recently revealed her decision to give up alcohol in a new approach to her life a year on from her cancer diagnosis.

Countryfile star Julia, 52, revealed she was diagnosed with breast cancer in September 2021 and underwent a mastectomy a month later.

Julia, who is mum to Zephyr, 11, and twins Xanthe and Zena, seven, opened up about her diagnosis and how it affected her in her candid documentary Julia Bradbury: Breast Cancer and Me.

And she’s on the Loose Women panel today to update fans on her life now ahead of Breast Cancer Awareness month in October.

Princess Diana was ‘defiant’ about her Panorama interview with Martin Bashir, a royal expert has claimed.

The late royal was determined to ‘win back her reputation’ with the explosive TV interview, because ‘she was terrified the Royal family would take her boys away’, according to Ingrid Seward.

Speaking to The Telegraph, the royal biographer said the princess had been ‘highly vulnerable and fairly desperate’ when she granted the interview to Panorama in 1995.

Yet Ingrid said the mother-of-two later confided in her that she was ‘defiant’ about the bombshell interview, explaining: ‘She did not regret the interview as a whole…She wanted the world to see who she really was: someone who could help others.’

+3

The ‘highly vulnerable and fairly desperate’ Princess Diana was ‘defiant’ about her Panorama interview with Martin Bashir, Ingrid Seward has claimed

The royal expert said she was invited by Princess Diana for a ‘girlie chat’ at Kensington Palace 18 months after the interview.

She claimed the late royal told her she ‘regretted talking about James Hewitt’ because she feared it could ‘hurt her sons.’

However Ingrid said Diana was ‘glad’ she had spoken of her bulimia, having received a flood of messages and letters from others who suffered from eating disorders.

Ingrid’s comments come as a new documentary – Diana: The Truth Behind the Interview – is set to air on Channel 4.

+3

Speaking to The Telegraph, Ingrid said the late royal ‘did not regret the interview’ about her marriage to Prince Charles because she ‘wanted the world to see who she really was’

It includes allegations that Bashir secured his infamous talk with the princess after an ‘elaborate plot’ which saw him show ‘faked’ bank statements to her brother.

Earl Spencer is said to have been so impressed by Bashir that he duly arranged for him to meet Diana.

The documentary also reveals Princess Diana thought her husband should ‘stand aside’ to let William succeed the Queen because he wasn’t up to the job.

Speaking before her bombshell TV interview with Martin Bashir, Diana also made plain her ‘hatred’ for Prince Charles and described their marriage as ‘hell from day one’.

Details of the extraordinary conversation with former Daily Telegraph editor Max Hastings have only emerged 25 years later as Sir Max declined to publish them in a bid to ‘keep a lid’ on the royal scandal.

The princess went on to lay her frustrations bare on Panorama weeks later.

The Channel 4 programme reveals how the princess poured her heart out to Sir Max three months before the Panorama interview, after driving to meet him in Berkshire. During their meeting, the princess even asked him if he had heard anything about a ‘conspiracy’ to have her ‘put down’.

Sir Max told Diana he was ‘terribly flattered’ she had ‘come all the way down to the country to talk to me’. In response, she said she was ‘terribly anxious for my side of this to come out’.

+3

Princess Diana pictured shaking hands with former Daily Telegraph editor Max Hastings

Sir Max said: ‘I spent the best part of a couple of hours with Diana and she put on a wonderful show. It was absolutely gripping stuff.

‘It became clear first of all how much she hated Charles… yes, she did hate Charles. When I said ‘were there ever happy times?’, she said ‘no, the marriage was hell from day one’.

‘I was amazed by the frankness and the directness with which she said that.

‘She said that all she cared about was William’s succession to the throne and she said to me, quite explicitly, ‘I don’t think Charles can do it’. The outcome she wanted to see was for Charles to stand aside as heir… and for William to occupy the throne. This was pretty dynamic stuff.’

Explaining his decision not to publish details of their conversation, Sir Max said: ‘I felt that my job was to try and help them keep a lid on the worst of this, rather than to lift it off.

‘Diana said a lot of stuff on several occasions which I thought [was] for the fairies. She asked me what I knew about a conspiracy to sort of have her put down. I said… it sounded absolutely crazy to me. But she, I think, did believe this sort of stuff and it was one of many, many things that made one feel so desperately sorry for her… this sense of vulnerability.

‘You may be a very streetwise, brilliant enchantress, but you can also be not very bright. If you’ve got nobody sensible to advise you, or if you have [but] you won’t take their advice, you’re in a pretty bad place.’

As well as covering Panorama, the documentary touches upon Charles’s own TV interview with Jonathan Dimbleby in 1994, which is said to have prompted Diana to respond in kind.

Hollywood executives are reportedly growing tired of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle noting their absence from events.

The pair were absent from a post-Emmy party thrown by WME talent agent boss (Image: Getty)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s absence from a post-Emmy party thrown by a talent agent boss has set tongues wagging in Hollywood.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were notably absent from last week’s WME’s star-studded Emmy bash in Beverly Hills, California, according to the Mail. It is not known whether Harry and Meghan were not invited or declined to attend but WME (William Morris Endeavor) is one of Hollywood’s leading talent agencies and includes Meghan as one of its clients.

It comes after reports Meghan had been dubbed “Duchess Difficult” by her staff in a prestigious US publication and was a “dictator in high heel” who ruled over staff with an iron fist.

The Hollywood Reporter, one of America’s prestigious entertainment news sources, recently published a scathing report claiming that her staff are allegedly “terrified” of her.

The Hollywood Reporter recently released a scathing report on Meghan Markle (Image: Getty)

In April last year, it was announced that Meghan had signed a representative deal with the talent agency, which stated that it would focus on “building out her business ventures across multiple facets of the agency and its broader ecosystem, including film and television production, brand partnerships, and more.”

The Mail claims that Hollywood insiders have suggested that the business is losing interest in the Montecito-based couple.

A senior figure added that Harry and Meghan “seem to be reaping the kind of ‘schadenfreude with extra venom’ at which the entertainment business excels”.

They added: “It was only a matter of time before the industry press started taking shots. It’s hard to find anyone with a good word to say for their film and television credibility.”

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are set to launch their own separate Netflix shows after wrapping up filming. Meghan will introduce her own cookery show whereas Harry will explore the sporting world of polo. Both projects are their first on the platform in over a year since Harry’s Heart of Invictus dropped on the streaming platform.

Prince Harry and his wife stepped down as senior working royals in 2020 (Image: Archewell Foundation)

Speaking of the Netflix deals, a source in the Mail added: “Netflix were handing out vanity deals like candy at the time and so everybody just shrugged their shoulders and assumed their company wouldn’t get much done despite the generous backing.

“But even Harry and Meghan naysayers would have been shocked at how little they’ve actually achieved. And in the more austere climate of the industry in 2024 when thousands of people have lost jobs and the entertainment industry economy is struggling, there’s now a genuine dislike and distrust towards them by some.”

A source dismissed Meghan’s “Duchess Difficult” title, and told the Sunday Express: “Everyone is deeply concerned over the timing of the article because it was published just days before Harry’s birthday.

“There are fears that there could be a disgruntled former member of staff who is putting out mistruths which are designed to make them look bad.

“The focus for Camp Sussex now is to build on the success of the last year and to take that positive momentum forward into 2025 and beyond.”

Prince Harry has continued his high-profile trip to New York City without Meghan Markle today and has appeared at a summit to talk about the Diana Award – named after his late mother Princess Diana

Prince Harry has talked candidly about his late mother Princess Diana during a run of high profile appearances in New York without Meghan Markle

The Duke of Sussex appeared at the Concordia Summit in New York, where he talked about the Diana Award, named in memory of his late mother Princess Diana, along with its CEO Dr Tessy Ojo. The charity, the only one set up Diana’s name, was set up 25 years ago to honour young people who want to change the world.
In conversation with Dr Ojo, Harry was also joined by two former Diana Award winners Christina Williams and Chiara Riyanti Hutapea Zhang, where they talked about the mental health crisis engulfing young people. Harry took to the stage for a Diana Award event as part of the Concordia Annual Summit. The duke smiled as walked to his seat while holding a microphone.

Dr Ojo said: “The Diana award is a living legacy to Diana, Princess of Wales, and usually when I talk about this, I have to try and tell you what who we are, and maybe tell you who Princess Diana is. But today I don’t have to do that, because I’m thrilled to be joined today by her son, Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex.”

She added: “I’m very grateful to have the Duke of Sussex with us. He is a passionate advocate for mental health. He actually said to me as we came in that actually we should no longer talk about mental health but we should talk about mental fitness. His dedication to this cause strengthens our mission.”

Harry, who was wearing a gold, square Diana Award badge on the lapel of his dark suit, asked the two Diana Legacy Award winners taking part what “worries you the most about the world today?” and “what are the biggest barriers to young people reaching their full potential?” During the question and answer session, he also asked quizzed them on how poor mental health had impacted them and their peers.

Harry at the Concordia summit today
Christina, 27, from Jamaica told the duke: “Scared children cannot dream, Prince Harry.”Harry said of mental health: “It affects every single one of us, from the top to bottom, from the youngest to the oldest. And I think you guys are you’re leading the charge in hopefully being able to break down the stigma to be able to continue these conversations.”

Talking about his mother, Harry said she would be proud of the award as well as the two winners of the prize, who spoke about the issues facing young people today. The duke added: “I know that my mum would be incredibly proud of you guys, not just you, but all of the winners, and, Tessy – you’ve been in this for a very long time so thank you for that as well. But the way that you do it, your activism, your compassion, those two things are so true to how my mom led her life and what she believed in. And the way that you do it is incredible. So thank you.”

The Duke of Sussex also called on governments to bring young people into decision making policy. “Surely one of the solutions here is for governments to implement, or at least find people young people like yourselves, and bring them into decision making, policy-making situations before the problems exist,” Harry said.

He added: “That is where the difference is going to be made. And why is that not happening?” Harry repeatedly adjusted his suit and tie and shifted in his chair as he sat on the stage.

Meanwhile, when asked what gives him hope for the future he said: “I have said it before years ago and I’ll say it again. The younger generation is what gives me hope. The courage you have gives me hope. Everyone of us needs courage to move the dial in this world, probably more than ever. We need to listen and act on what you say because it is your future that will be stolen and that is unacceptable.”

Prince Harry as a young boy with his late mother Princess Diana ( 
Image:
Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images)
Harry is on a solo trip to the Big Apple, where he is due to speak at several high-profile events that coincide with the United Nations General Assembly this week. On arriving in the city, he last night joined a dinner hosted by the World Health Organisation.

There Harry was seen rubbing shoulders with the likes of Queen Mathilde of Belgium and the Hollywood actor Forest Whittaker at the event to honour survivors of childhood violence. The dinner comes just hours after Harry was forced to make a solo appearance at a charity event on Friday, with Meghan noticeably absent.

Harry appeared alone at the charity event organised by Kevin Costner honouring first responders and presented an award to a fellow helicopter pilot. Harry attended the event last year, with many hoping his wife Meghan would join him for the 2024 event – the same as the previous year. However, a source at the event mysteriously said: “We were all hoping Meghan would attend like she did last year but the word is that she is sick and could not make it.”

During Harry’s stay in New York this week, he is set to appear at several major events. Harry is championing causes close to his heart and those associated with Diana, Princess of Wales . Later today he will make an appearance for the Halo Trust, the landmine clearance charity supported by Diana, and then a private engagement with conservation group African Parks.

Tomorrow, he will appear at the 2024 Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting. The Foundation was founded by former US president Bill Clinton and supported by his wife former US Secretary of state Hilary Clinton and their daughter Chelsea, with the theme of this year’s gathering of political, business and philanthropic leaders called “What’s Working”.

During his appearance at the meeting, Harry plans to discuss the launch of The Archewell Foundation Parents’ Network, an initiative supporting parents whose children have suffered or died due to online harm. He will also address his nonprofit’s collaboration with the World Health Organization and others to end violence against children, an issue he and his wife Meghan outlined on their recent trip to Colombia.

However, one person Harry won’t be seeing in New York is his older brother, Prince William. Harry’s trip will also overlap with the 2024 Earthshot Prize Innovation Summit, scheduled for Tuesday.

The Earthshot Prize is one of William’s key areas of work, and last year he was in New York for the 2023 summit. It led to speculation that the feuding brothers could awkwardly be in New York at the same time next month. But it has since emerged William is not travelling to the Big Apple later this month and had never planned to.

William did attend the summit in 2023 but his appearance at it in 2022 had to be cancelled as it came during a period of royal mourning after the death and funeral of the late Queen – although he did send a video message.

In a dramatic turn of events that has captivated royal enthusiasts and the general public, reports have emerged revealing a serious rift between Prince William and his younger brother, Prince Harry.

This escalating family conflict is set against a backdrop of ongoing disputes and public remarks that have increasingly alienated Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, from the rest of the royal family.

Let’s delve into this unfolding saga.

Sources close to the royal household have disclosed that Prince William is deeply troubled by Harry’s recent behavior and public comments.

A private message, which was subsequently leaked, allegedly contains a stern warning from William to Harry about the potential consequences of his actions.

The elder prince reportedly emphasized that if Harry and Meghan continue on their current trajectory, they could face severe repercussions, including a complete withdrawal of support from the royal family.

The tension has escalated further with William hinting at possible legal action against the Sussexes.

He reportedly cited the royal family’s access to top-tier legal resources, suggesting that they might pursue a defamation lawsuit in response to what they perceive as false claims made by Harry and Meghan.

This marks an unusual and significant development within the British royal family, underscoring the depth of the rift between the brothers.

In addition to legal threats, there’s also the looming possibility of financial repercussions.

William’s message included a stark warning that the royal family is prepared to cut off all financial assistance to Harry and Meghan.

Such a move would represent a new low in their already strained relationship, highlighting the royal family’s determination to distance themselves from the Sussexes’ increasingly vocal criticisms of royal life.

As tensions mount, it is rumored that Prince William intends to hold a crucial meeting with King Charles and senior members of Parliament in November.

This gathering is expected to focus on the serious consideration of stripping Harry and Meghan of their royal titles.

Should this occur, it would formalize their separation from royal duties and privileges, marking a significant shift in their connection to the royal family.

On the flip side, insiders close to Prince Harry have indicated that he is feeling both outraged and humiliated by his brother’s accusations and threats.

Having previously opened up about his struggles with mental health and the pressures associated with royal expectations, Harry perceives these actions as further attempts to marginalize him and his family from the royal establishment.

As the royal family teeters on the edge of what appears to be an irreparable split, public and media scrutiny intensifies with each new development.

The situation not only underscores the complexities of personal relationships within one of the world’s most recognized families but also raises important questions about the monarchy’s role and relevance in contemporary society.

Will this familial rift ever mend, or are we witnessing the beginnings of a deeper divide?

As the anticipated November meeting looms, the stakes have never been higher for the royal family.

The outcome could redefine the future of the Sussexes and their standing within the monarchy.

Rumors have been circulating for some time that all may not be well behind Palace walls, and now, a bombshell development has emerged, offering startling new insight into Meghan’s true intentions.  Meghan and Harry married in 2018 in a lavish ceremony watched by millions worldwide. It seemed like a fairy-tale romance and the start of a bright new chapter for the monarchy. However, just two years later, they dramatically announced their decision to step back from royal duties and move part-time to North America. This move shocked the Queen and senior royals, creating deep divisions within the family, most notably between Harry and his brother William.

Since then, there have been constant whispers suggesting that Meghan was the driving force behind this decision and that she never truly wanted a life of royal service and duty. Many have speculated that Meghan was more interested in fame and fortune. Now, new information has come to light that elevates these rumors to an entirely new level.

As you may know, when Princess Diana tragically passed away in 1997, she left her substantial fortune, estimated at tens of millions, to be divided between Prince William and Prince Harry upon their 30th birthdays. This is where things take a more intriguing turn. Sources with direct knowledge of Diana’s estate have exclusively revealed that a significant portion of Harry’s inheritance was quietly transferred into a private bank account solely controlled by Meghan just a month before their royal wedding in 2018. At the time, this was seen as prudent financial planning for the couple as they began their married life. However, the timing and secrecy of this transaction have raised serious new questions.

I’m told that the amount deposited equated to nearly 40% of Harry’s expected inheritance from his mother. Why such a disproportionately large sum? And why was it handled discreetly without William’s knowledge or the Palace’s involvement, as is normally required for royal financial matters?

It gets even more troubling. My sources now say that in the weeks before Meghan and Harry’s explosive announcement last year about quitting their senior royal roles, the contents of that secret bank account were completely liquidated and quietly wired to accounts only accessible by Meghan in America. The money, totaling tens of millions, was then used to purchase an opulent mansion in California, registered solely in Meghan’s name.

This revelation adds staggering new context to long-held suspicions that Meghan’s intentions all along were to divorce Harry, secure a massive financial payout from his royal ties and inheritance, and set herself up as an independently wealthy celebrity in America, free from royal obligations. It appears she may have even made secret plans involving Diana’s money to achieve this goal behind closed doors.

If these allegations are proven accurate, it would represent an incredible betrayal of the royal family’s trust and of Harry’s, who has shown nothing but loyalty and devotion to his wife since their wedding. It seems Meghan may have used Harry for fame, social climbing, and access to royal wealth to further her own ambitious agenda. Did she even truly love him?

Of course, none of this has been officially confirmed at this stage, and Meghan’s lawyers will undoubtedly deny any wrongdoing. However, the facts regarding the mysterious bank accounts and the tens of millions that ended up directly in Meghan’s hands raise too many questions to be easily dismissed. An official police investigation may now be warranted to get to the bottom of it.

Whatever he truth my be, it now seems almost certain that their controversial exit from royal life and their subsequent behavior were part of Meghan’s deep-seated scheme all along, using Harry’s own mother’s money to make it happen. If so, it would rank as one of the most shocking royal betrayals of all time and perhaps one of the greatest deceptions ever orchestrated so brazenly in public view.

In summary, this developing story represents a pivotal turning point in Meghan and Harry’s saga and offers a stark new perspective on all that has transpired since their wedding.