Blog

Ever since the scandal involving Jessica Mulroney trying to sabotage influencer Sasha Exeter’s career came to light, both Jessica and her husband, Ben Mulroney, have maintained a low profile on social media.

However, recent reports from the Daily Mail suggest that Jessica may be planning to reveal shocking secrets about Meghan Markle in a tell-all book.

Ben Mulroney, breaking his silence, responded to these claims.

The Daily Mail, which Meghan is currently suing, reported last week that Jessica has been reaching out to Meghan incessantly, as well as contacting mutual friends in an attempt to mend their fractured friendship.

An anonymous source revealed that Jessica is heartbroken over Meghan’s apparent abandonment during her time of need.

Despite efforts from their friends to reconcile, Meghan seems to have made up her mind to sever ties, similar to how she has distanced herself from her own family.

Rumors suggest that Jessica, feeling cornered, is contemplating writing a tell-all book about Meghan, as she feels she has nothing left to lose.

Meanwhile, in other news, Prince Harry is reportedly not giving up on the idea of a potential return to the royal fold, contrasting Meghan Markle’s reluctance to revisit the UK, according to a royal expert.

Following their decision to step back as senior working royals in 2020, Prince Harry, 37, and Meghan, 40, have occasionally visited the UK, including attending the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebration in June.

Speculation has lingered on whether the couple, now residing in the US, will permanently return to the UK.

Royal expert Neil Sean hinted at conflicting views within the couple regarding a possible return.

While Harry seems open to the idea of returning to the UK at some point, Meghan reportedly has expressed her aversion to the country due to perceived racism and unwelcoming attitudes.

Sean questioned whether Harry’s return would be a solo endeavor, hinting at potential complexities in their future plans.

A spokesperson for Meghan and Harry recently announced their upcoming visit to the UK next month, where they plan to engage with charities and organizations close to their hearts.

This visit marks their first return to the UK since the Jubilee celebrations in June.

Since stepping back from their royal duties in 2020, the couple has been residing in the US with their two children, three-year-old Archie Harrison and one-year-old Lilibet Diana.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s visit raises questions about whether their young children will accompany them on this trip.

As the couple prepares to revisit the UK amidst ongoing speculations and controversies, their presence is anticipated to draw significant attention and scrutiny from the public and media alike.

The dynamics of their relationship with the royal family and Meghan’s evolving stance on her ties to the UK continue to captivate audiences worldwide.

 

Meghan Markle found herself at the center of a storm as shocking revelations surfaced about her past, shedding light on a web of secrets and deceit.

The emotional turmoil was palpable as Meg, visibly distressed, spoke out about her children and the tangled affairs that threatened to unravel her carefully crafted image.

In a bombshell confession, Trevor, a key figure in the saga, divulged details of his affair with the Duchess behind her husband Harry’s back.

As Meg grappled with the betrayal, the truth about her first marriage resurfaced, courtesy of an unexpected source – an old friend who decided to lift the veil on Meghan’s past demands and desires.

The revelations painted a picture of a woman torn between her public persona and private insecurities.

Meg’s fear of weight gain, particularly in her face, was a constant shadow looming over her, fueled by the pressures of her career and the relentless scrutiny of the media.

The quest for perfection drove her to extreme measures, including contractual agreements with her ex-husband to maintain her appearance at all costs.

As the intricate web of deceit unraveled, it became clear that Meghan’s ambitions knew no bounds.

Her relentless pursuit of a Hollywood lifestyle and a picture-perfect image left a trail of broken promises and shattered illusions.

The revelation of her calculated maneuvers to control those around her cast a dark shadow over her once-glamorous facade.

The friend who lifted the lid on Meghan’s past painted a damning portrait of a woman consumed by ambition and willing to manipulate those closest to her to achieve her goals.

The stark contrast between the public persona of a modern princess and the private reality of a scheming manipulator laid bare the complexities of Meghan’s character.

The allegations of contractual obligations and calculated moves to maintain a certain image raised questions about Meghan’s true intentions and the depths of her deception.

The notion of using others as pawns in her quest for power and influence painted a chilling picture of a woman driven by ambition at any cost.

As the dust settled on the explosive revelations, one thing became clear – Meghan Markle’s carefully constructed facade was beginning to crumble, revealing a darker, more manipulative side to the enigmatic Duchess.

The intricate tapestry of lies and deceit she had woven threatened to unravel, exposing the true extent of her deception and the toll it had taken on those around her.

In the wake of the scandal, whispers of discontent and betrayal echoed through the halls of royalty, casting a shadow over Meghan’s once-glamorous image.

The stark contrast between the public perception of a beloved princess and the private reality of a calculating manipulator left many questioning the true nature of the woman behind the carefully curated facade.

The Duchess of Sussex Sparks Controversy with Allegations of Jewel Theft

 

A recent headline in the National Enquirer has stirred up a storm of controversy, accusing Meghan Markle of absconding with $10 million worth of jewelry that once belonged to Princess Diana.

According to the tabloid, Markle is allegedly refusing to return the precious jewels, further fueling the ongoing smear campaign against her.

Unnamed sources from the palace have revealed Prince William’s fury over the Sussexes’ decision to leave their royal duties behind and pursue fame in Hollywood.

The insider claims that Markle even demanded Kate Middleton hand over a Princess Diana ring that was intended for Prince Harry.

Additionally, Markle reportedly expressed anger at being given a diamond tiara instead of the emerald one she desired for her wedding day.

Speculation runs rampant as to how many other treasures Markle may have taken with her.

Meanwhile, in a separate development, a poll conducted by Express.co.uk indicates that a vast majority of readers have no interest in listening to Markle’s new podcast series.

Titled “Archetypes,” the podcast’s first episode featured Markle in conversation with tennis star Serena Williams, discussing topics such as motherhood, pregnancy, and societal perceptions of ambition in women.

The hour-long episode also included an interview with Dr. Laura Kay, where Markle shared personal anecdotes about her struggles with ambition and motherhood.

Despite the initial excitement surrounding “Archetypes,” the poll results revealed that only a small fraction of respondents expressed a willingness to tune in.

Many readers voiced their disinterest in the podcast, with some even going as far as canceling their Spotify subscriptions in protest.

Markle and Prince Harry’s partnership with Spotify has allowed them more freedom to express their views and beliefs, with “Archetypes” serving as their debut project under the deal.

Royal author Omid Scobie praised Markle’s podcast as a platform for her to reclaim her voice after feeling stifled by the royal institution.

In a column for Yahoo News, Scobie commended Markle for embracing her uncensored narrative and creating a space for open dialogue.

He highlighted the significance of Markle’s newfound autonomy and the impact it could have on her audience, emphasizing her journey toward self-expression and empowerment.

As Markle continues to navigate her post-royal life alongside Prince Harry, her foray into podcasting signals a shift towards reclaiming her identity and advocating for causes close to her heart.

The controversy surrounding the jewel theft allegations and the lukewarm reception to her podcast underscore the complexities of Markle’s public image and the challenges she faces in the spotlight.

Royal Drama Unfolds: Meghan Markle’s Unexpected Request to King Charles

 

Meghan Markle, known for her controversial decisions, has reportedly made a surprising formal request to King Charles III amidst ongoing tensions within the royal family.

Initially, Meghan and her father-in-law appeared to share a close bond, with King Charles stepping in to escort her down the aisle in the absence of Meghan’s father during her wedding to Prince Harry.

However, cracks began to show in their relationship when Meghan and Harry decided to step back from their royal duties and move to the United States.

In recent months, Meghan has further strained her relationship with King Charles by publicly discussing the marital issues between him and Prince Harry.

Despite this, a new development has emerged suggesting that Meghan is seeking reconciliation with her husband’s father before their imminent departure to California.

According to a reliable source, Meghan has expressed her desire to meet privately with King Charles to mend their friendship.

Royal correspondent Neil Sean revealed that Meghan has penned a letter to King Charles, aiming to address past grievances and clarify their actions over the past few years.

The contents of the letter are expected to provide insight into Meghan’s perspective and potentially pave the way for improved relations between the two parties.

However, the outcome of this meeting remains uncertain, as it is unclear whether King Charles will agree to Meghan’s request.

During the recent state funeral for Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Harry found himself seated behind King Charles and Queen Camilla, prompting speculation about the dynamics within the royal family.

While some viewed this seating arrangement as a sign of disrespect towards Harry, others suggested that it symbolized King Charles’s desire to have his son close by during the somber event.

Royal experts have emphasized the complexity of these relationships and the significance of gestures within the royal hierarchy.

As the Duke and Duchess of Sussex navigate their post-royal life, the spotlight remains on Prince Harry’s evolving relationship with his father, King Charles.

The public scrutiny surrounding their interactions underscores the challenges faced by the royal family in maintaining unity amidst personal differences and public expectations.

Meghan’s attempt to reconcile with King Charles reflects a desire for harmony within the family, but whether this will lead to tangible improvements remains to be seen.

In the midst of royal drama and speculation, one thing is certain – the dynamics within the House of Windsor continue to captivate audiences worldwide.

Meghan Markle’s unexpected request to King Charles adds another layer of intrigue to the ongoing saga of the royal family, highlighting the complexities of relationships under the public eye.

As Meghan and Harry prepare to embark on a new chapter in their lives, the outcome of their interactions with the royal family remains a topic of intense interest and speculation.

In a surprising revelation, Meghan Markle, alongside Prince Harry, made headlines in 2020 when they decided to step down from their roles within the working royal family.

However, recent reports have shed light on a lesser-known incident involving Meghan’s past acting career.

According to the show s creator…aron Korsh, Meghan Markle faced restrictions on using a particular British term during the final season of the hit TV series “Suits In an interview that has recently resurfaced, Korsh disclosed that the Duchess of Sussex was prohibited by the Palace from saying the word poppyc***” оп сатега This directive reportedly dates back to Lefore Meghan’s marriage to Prince Harry in 2018 when she was still portraying the character Rachel Zane in the legal drama series.

Korsh explained that the original script included a line where Meghan’s character, Rachel Zane, was supposed to mention the term “poppyc***” as a subtle reference to his own family’s communication habits.

He elaborated, “My wife’s family, when they have a topic to discuss that might be sensitive, they use the word ‘poppyc**** However, the Royal amily intervened and objected to Meghan saying the word, expressing concerns that it could be manipulated to sound like a more offensive term. Korsh recalled, “They didn’t want to put the word ‘poppyc**** in her mouth I presume because they didn’t want people cutting things together of her saying ‘ck’

 

 

So, we had to change it to ‘bulls*** The resurfacing of this revelation, particularly on social media platform TikTok, has sparked mixed reactions among royal fans While some applaud the Palace’s caution, noting the potential for misinterpretation or manipulation of the footage, others argue that in the modern era, such restrictions may seem outdated
“It’s only right they consider this stuff,” commented one supporter of the Palace’s decision, emphasizing the importance of upholding the royal family’s image as representatives of the British state. Conversely, another commenter pointed out, “it’s the 21st century and it’s just a word,” suggesting a more relaxed stance on such language restrictions. The incident serves as a reminder of the intricacies and protocols surrounding the royal family’s public image, even in seemingly minor aspects of their lives and careers.

Dave Bautista’s Explosive Outburst at Meghan Markle Shocks Tonight Show Audience**

 

In an unexpected twist during a seemingly light-hearted segment of *The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon*, actor and former wrestler Dave Bautista unleashed a torrent of fury directed at Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex.

What was intended to be a fun-filled evening quickly spiraled into a dramatic confrontation that left the audience in stunned silence.

The incident unfolded when Fallon invited Bautista, who was seated among the audience, to join him on stage for a game.

Eager to showcase his competitive spirit, Bautista approached the host with enthusiasm.

However, upon taking his seat, the 53-year-old star of *Guardians of the Galaxy* suddenly turned his attention towards Meghan, who was also present that night.

“Hey, you!” Bautista shouted, his voice echoing throughout the studio.

“Yeah, you, Meghan Markle.

I’ve got something to say, and you better listen.” The atmosphere shifted instantly, with the audience holding their breath in disbelief at this unanticipated outburst.

Jimmy Fallon, caught off guard, attempted to lighten the mood.

“Whoa, whoa, Dave, let’s keep this friendly, shall we?” he said, forcing a laugh.

But Bautista wasn’t in the mood for jokes.

“Stay out of this, Jimmy.

This is between me and the Duchess of Delusion over there,” he retorted, leaving the host visibly uneasy.

Meghan, seated in the front row, appeared uncomfortable but maintained her composure.

“I’m not sure what I’ve done to upset you, Mr. Bautista,” she replied calmly.

“I’m open to having a respectful conversation about whatever’s bothering you.” Her poised response contrasted sharply with Bautista’s escalating aggression.

The actor slammed his fist on the table, his frustration palpable.

“Discuss?

You want to discuss, huh?

Well, let me tell you something, sweetheart, I don’t want to discuss a damn thing with you.

In fact, I have one simple message: shut your mouth.” Gasps filled the room as the tension reached a boiling point.

Fallon, sensing the situation spiraling out of control, interjected, “Dave, come on, let’s keep this civil.” But Bautista remained defiant, standing up and towering over Meghan.

“You heard me, Meghan.

Shut your mouth for me, an ugly man.

That’s all I’ve got to say.”

Despite Bautista’s intimidating presence, Meghan held her ground.

“I’m sorry you feel that way, Mr. Bautista,” she replied, her voice steady.

“But I won’t be silenced, nor will I apologize for speaking my truth.” Her unwavering stance only seemed to fuel Bautista’s ire.

“Your truth, huh?

Well, let me tell you something about the truth, sweetheart.

Nobody cares what you have to say.

You’re just a privileged, attention-seeking brat who can’t seem to keep her mouth shut,” he shot back, prompting further gasps from the audience.

With the situation escalating, Fallon stepped in once more, urging Bautista to take a seat.

“All right, that’s enough.

Dave, I think it’s time to move on with the show,” he said firmly.

Bautista glared at both Fallon and Meghan before reluctantly returning to his chair.

As he sat down, Bautista pointed a beefy finger at Meghan, warning her, “Mark my words, Duchess, you better learn to keep that trap of yours shut, or you’re going to regret it.” Meghan simply shook her head, refusing to engage further and redirecting her attention back to the stage.

The remainder of the segment continued without incident, yet the tension lingered in the air.

Audience members were left to ponder what could have ignited such a fierce backlash from the usually amiable Bautista.

As the show wrapped up, Fallon acknowledged the unexpected drama with a nervous chuckle, remarking, “Well, folks, I think it’s safe to say we didn’t see that one coming.”

As the cameras stopped rolling, Bautista was seen storming out of the studio, muttering under his breath.

Meanwhile, Meghan maintained her composed demeanor, seemingly unfazed by the altercation.

Whether this incident will have any lasting impact remains to be seen, but it’s certainly a moment that will linger in the minds of those who witnessed it.

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s political statement is “in line” with their global brand but shows disregard for “royal guidelines”, claims an expert.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to  wade into politics and release a statement regarding the US election showed they disregard “royal guidelines and customs”, staying focused on their global brand instead, a PR expert has claimed.

The Duke and Duchess issued a statement through their Archewell Foundation’s website earlier this week and urged people to vote in the US elections this November.

Archwell’s message read: “Voting is not just a right; it’s a fundamental way to influence the fate of our communities. At The Archewell Foundation, we recognize(sic) that civic engagement, no matter one’s political party, is at the heart of a more just and equitable world. By participating in initiatives like this, we aim to amplify the message that every voice matters. Together, let’s make sure every eligible voter is informed and empowered to participate in shaping America’s future.”

Generally, members of the Royal Family steer clear of politics and refrain from voicing their political opinions.

But while Harry and Meghan stepped down as senior working members of the Royal Family and did not endorse either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump, their latest statement did contain political overtones.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle issued a statement ahead of the US election in November (Image: Getty)

The Sussexes did not endorse Kamala Harris nor Donald Trump (Image: Getty)

However, a PR expert has claimed that their message was “in line” with their global brand of doing “what they want, without any thought towards royal guidelines or customs”.

Renae Smith, founder and director of the Atticism, told Express.co.uk: “From a PR perspective, their statement on the US elections likely won’t have a significant impact, either positively or negatively.

“Since Harry and Meghan no longer hold working royal status, they’re not bound by the same conventions, and their audience, by now, expects them to speak out on political and social issues.

“They’ve worked hard to drive home their position as independent global figures, so this statement falls in line with the brand they’ve been working to build – eg that they do what they want, without any thought towards royal guidelines or customs.”

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s message was issued through their Archewell Foundation (Image: Getty)

But Ms Smith added that despite aligning with their brand, their statement could still spark backlash from those who still associate them with the Royal Family.

She explained: “While it might not shock their supporters, their decision to speak on a political matter might still raise eyebrows among critics, especially those who still associate them with their royal ties and feel they’re trying to play both sides of the coin when it comes to royalty.

“That said, because they didn’t endorse any specific candidate, I believe this statement will be viewed as neutral in its impact.”

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex declined to comment.

 Tensions Rise on The View as Meghan Markle Faces Anne Coulter’s Fiery Critique

 

In a recent episode of *The View*, viewers were treated to an intense clash between Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, and conservative commentator Anne Coulter.

This encounter sparked significant discussion, especially after Meghan posed a provocative question regarding racial representation in media.

The atmosphere was charged from the moment Meghan entered the studio, with the audience acutely aware of the brewing tension between the two women.

Meghan, who has faced her fair share of controversies since stepping back from royal duties, aimed to leverage her platform to shine a light on systemic racism.

“I’ve been very vocal about the need for greater diversity and inclusion in the industry,” she stated, her demeanor resolute as she addressed the panel.

She boldly asked, “Can you tell me why it is that people of color are so often overlooked and marginalized in the media?”

However, the question seemed to backfire spectacularly.

Coulter, known for her sharp tongue and unapologetic views, responded with a barrage of criticism that left both the audience and Meghan momentarily stunned.

“Oh please, Meghan, spare us the self-righteous lecture on diversity and inclusion,” Coulter shot back, her tone laced with contempt.

Coulter continued her tirade, asserting that the real victims of marginalization were not people of color but rather “hard-working middle-class Americans” struggling to get by.

Her assertion that Meghan and others like her lived in “ivory towers” while preaching about inclusivity struck a chord, creating a palpable silence in the studio.

The conservative commentator then escalated her critique, claiming that the lack of representation in media was due to a supposed deficiency in talent and drive among people of color.

“It’s not about racism; it’s about merit,” she declared, pointing a finger at Meghan as an example of someone using her race to advance her agenda under the guise of social justice.

Caught off guard by the intensity of the exchange, Meghan appeared momentarily speechless, struggling to formulate a response.

The other panelists exchanged uneasy glances, unsure how to diffuse the situation or redirect the conversation.

Yet, Coulter was far from finished.

“You talk about diversity and inclusion, but it seems like your primary concern is yourself,” she continued, attacking Meghan’s royal past.

Coulter accused the Duchess of playing the victim card after marrying into the royal family and subsequently criticizing the institution that gave her a platform.

The audience reacted with a mix of gasps and murmurs, some cheering Coulter’s boldness while others expressed outrage at her harsh words directed at Meghan.

With her cheeks flushed from a blend of anger and disbelief, Meghan attempted to interject, but Coulter pressed on without hesitation.

As the debate grew more heated, Coulter turned her focus to Meghan’s personal life, accusing her of abandoning her family.

“You disowned your father and cut ties with your own flesh and blood,” she said.

“You claim to want a more inclusive world, but it appears your interests are solely self-serving.”

With each passing moment, the confrontation escalated, revealing deep-seated issues surrounding race, privilege, and personal responsibility.

Coulter’s words resonated with many, while others were left questioning the integrity of her claims.

In a poignant gesture that speaks volumes amid the ongoing rift within the royal family, King Charles marked Prince William’s 42nd birthday with a heartfelt tribute that seems aimed at his younger son, Prince Harry.

On Friday, Buckingham Palace enhanced the celebrations by sharing an endearing black-and-white photograph of a young William nestled on his father’s lap, radiating joy and affection.

This image, captured in 1982, not only commemorates the heir’s special day but also serves as a stark reminder of family bonds that Harry appears to have strained.

As tensions escalate between the royals and Harry, this tribute has been interpreted as a lesson for the Duke of Sussex.

Following the revelations in his memoir “Spare,” which included allegations against the royal family, the absence of similar recognition for Harry’s birthday—September 15—has not gone unnoticed.

The king’s choice of an image predating Harry’s birth adds another layer of significance, subtly suggesting that family unity takes precedence over individual grievances.

Sources close to Harry have hinted at his likely emotional response to this public display of affection.

One insider remarked that seeing the touching tribute could leave Harry feeling disheartened, especially as he has often voiced feelings of being the ‘spare’ rather than an equal member of the family.

The source suggested that this heartfelt acknowledgment of William might have brought Harry to tears, emphasizing the pain of exclusion.

Another insider added depth to this narrative, noting that King Charles tends to honor those who remain loyal and steadfast to the royal institution.

His actions seem to reflect a broader strategy of distancing himself from those who have turned away from the family, reinforcing a sense of loyalty and commitment among those who stand by him.

Catherine, the Princess of Wales, joined in the celebration by sharing a touching, never-before-seen photo of William with their three children—Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis.

The image captures a joyful moment of the Prince of Wales leaping with his kids on a beach in Norfolk, showcasing the warmth and love within their family.

The accompanying caption, penned by Catherine, expressed the children’s affection for their father, making it clear that William is cherished.

Adding to the royal birthday wishes, the U.S. State Department Diplomatic Service extended their congratulations on social media, highlighting the honor of providing security for Prince William during his travels.

This public acknowledgment may serve as a reminder of the support and recognition that Harry seems to crave.

Amidst these celebrations, there are whispers of frustration from Harry’s camp, particularly regarding his ongoing battle for security arrangements when visiting the UK.

Some observers speculate that the Duke may feel envious of the attention and acknowledgment William receives, especially given his own struggles with his status within the family.

Earlier this year, Prince Harry faced significant challenges concerning his security while in the UK, following a legal dispute with the Home Office over the level of taxpayer-funded protection he should receive.

This controversy has drawn attention to the changing dynamics within the royal family, particularly after Harry stepped back as a full-time working member.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have waded into the upcoming US presidential election by issuing a new statement on voting – and it seems they’ve made a huge decision when it comes to endorsing a candidate

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reportedly made a huge decision regarding the US presidential election, which is fast approaching.

Yesterday, the pair issued an urgent statement surrounding the race for the White House marking the first time they have waded into the 2024 vote. It was revealed that couple’s charitable foundation The Archewell Foundation marked National Voter Registration Day earlier this week with members of the charity’s team writing letters urging people to sign up to vote ahead of polling day on November 5.

However, despite sharing the post on their foundation website, it stopped short of endorsing either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump, who are both vying to to be the next president.

And according to The Telegraph, the Sussexes will remain publicly neutral throughout the campaign and have decided not to voice their support for either candidate. Instead, in a post on its website, the Archewell foundation explained how its staff “came together for a meaningful volunteer activity to support and empower our communities.”

It added: “Using Vote Forward’s impactful letter-writing tool, our team wrote personalized letters encouraging unregistered voters to take a crucial step: registering to vote.” It urged people to use their vote, adding: “Voting is not just a right; it’s a fundamental way to influence the fate of our communities.

“At The Archewell Foundation, we recognize that civic engagement, no matter one’s political party, is at the heart of a more just and equitable world. By participating in initiatives like this, we aim to amplify the message that every voice matters. Together, let’s make sure every eligible voter is informed and empowered to participate in shaping America’s future.” Working royals in the UK usually refrain from commenting on politics or voting in elections.

The couple in a video urging people to vote in 2020 ( 
Image:
Internet Unknown)
However, it is not the first time Harry and Meghan have urged those in the US to use their vote. In September 2020, at the time of the last US presidential election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, the couple appeared in a video message and urged Americans to ‘vote against hate speech’.

In the video broadcast as part of Time 100 magazine’s annual list of the top 100 most influential people, Harry also explained how he would not be able to vote and had never voted in the UK as a member of the Royal Family.

While they did not specifically mention anyone by name, the remarks were interpreted as referring to US President Donald Trump and therefore an endorsement of Mr Biden, with some claiming it was a breach of the Sandringham Summit agreement, which was written up when the couple quit their royal duties in 2020. Later Mr Trump spoke out saying he was “no fan” of Meghan.

In addition, royal aides told The Sunday Times at the time that the remarks broke the pledge, leaving the Royal Family “wringing their hands”. “The feeling is it’s a violation of the agreement,’ one source said.

Meanwhile, it has long been rumoured that Meghan could favour a career in politics one day. In 2021, she spent time cold-calling senators in the US as she campaigned for paid parental leave. The Duchess is said to have called senators Shelley Moore Capito and Susan Collins using a withheld number and told them: “This is Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex.”

Also, during the last US election campaign, Meghan joined forces with feminist Gloria Steinem as they called on Americans to vote. In an interview with Access Hollywood, Gloria said: “She came home to vote. The first thing we did, and why she came to see me, was we sat at the dining room table where I am right now and we cold-called voters.” She also said that Meghan was “so excited” to see Kamala Harris running to be vice president.