Blog

The BBC have issued an apology to Amanda Abbington, after upholding a series of her bullying claims. Amanda is now expected to sue over her treatment

Giovanni Pernice has told pals he hopes to return to Strictly Come Dancing next year in spite of the findings of this week’s BBC report, sources say.

The long-awaited BBC report cleared the former star of violence, but issued an apology to Amanda Abbington after upholding a series of her bullying claims. Amanda is now expected to sue over her treatment.

But sources close to the pro dancer said he has not given up hope of returning to the Strictly stage next year despite signing up for the Italian version of the BBC show. Giovanni, 34, told friends he has only signed for one series of Ballando Con Le Stelle, and has “unfinished business” on the UK version.

One source said: “Giovanni has not given up on appearing on the Strictly stage. As far as he is concerned, he has been cleared and there is no reason why he couldn’t return. He has told his pals he is hoping to be back next year and is keen to speak to the BBC about it. He still feels very much part of the fold, and has a massive fan base who would no doubt welcome him back. But of course the final decision will be made by BBC bosses.” A spokesperson for Giovanni last night declined to comment.

Speaking in a bombshell interview on Newnight on Wednesday night, Amanda said she has “no regrets” about lodging complaints against Giovanni, despite receiving “hundreds” of death and rape threats. “It’s been one of the worst years of my life,” she shared on the BBC show. “I’ve been through a lot, women go through a lot, but it has been a very unpleasant, turbulent, relentless time in my life. I’ve had to deal with a myriad of horrible things.”

The actress didn’t enjoy her Strictly Come Dancing experience
The 50-year-old said that, in the last eight months, the number of threats she has received had “gone into the hundreds”. In August, the Metropolitan Police confirmed they were investigating after they were called to the Park Theatre in Finsbury Park to an alleged death threat sent to Amanda, who was starring in When It Happens To You.

“I had a credible death threat sent to my place of work, a theatre that I was working at, which was credible and the police had to be called,” the Sherlock actress told host Victoria Derbyshire. “I had a bomb threat sent to my place of work, threatening to blow the building up because I was pursuing this.I’ve had death threats sent to me, my family.

“I’ve had rape threats sent to my 15-year-old daughter, saying ‘I’m just laughing at the moment thinking about you having to watch your daughter get raped for what you’ve done to Giovanni Pernice’ They were every day I’d be getting those and I have screenshots that have been handed over to the Met Police.”

Amanda also revealed she is seeking daily legal advice amid the fallout from the Strictly Come Dancing bullying investigation. In her first public remarks since the investigation concluded, Amanda indicated she’s contemplating legal action. Discussing her current stance, Amanda told Newsnight host Victoria that she’s “taking guidance from my lawyer on a day to day basis”. Amanda shed light on the complexity of the situation: “There’s a 30-page report that me and my lawyers are still digesting. There are still things in there that are unresolved.”

A spokesman for Giovanni said: “It’s disappointing that Ms Abbington would knowingly mislead the outcome of the report in order to further attempt to damage Giovanni’s reputation. While Ms Abbington may not like the outcome of the six-month investigation, she should not seek to spread false and defamatory claims.” Giovanni has denied the allegations against him.

Prince Harry Insists Meghan Markle Has a Lot in Common with His Mother, Disappointed by Family’s Inability to See Similarities with Princess Diana

Prince Harry has often drawn parallels between his wife, Meghan Markle, and his late mother, Princess Diana. Despite his deep conviction about their similarities, Harry has expressed disappointment that his family cannot see the connections he believes are so evident.

Harry’s admiration for Meghan and his comparison of her to Diana have been a recurring theme since their relationship became public. He has spoken about the shared traits between the two women, highlighting their compassion, resilience, and commitment to charitable causes. In numerous interviews, Harry has underscored Meghan’s ability to connect with people, her empathy, and her dedication to making a positive impact—qualities he cherished in his mother.

“From the moment I met Meghan, I saw so much of my mother in her,” Harry has said. “Her warmth, her kindness, her confidence—it reminded me of the way my mother conducted herself and the way she interacted with people.”

 

 

However, Harry’s family appears to have a different perspective. Reports suggest that the senior royals, including Prince William and Prince Charles, have not embraced the comparisons between Meghan and Diana as warmly as Harry has. This divergence in views has reportedly been a source of frustration and disappointment for Harry, who feels that his family’s inability to see the similarities is a missed opportunity for unity and understanding.

The parallels Harry draws between Meghan and Diana are not just limited to their personal qualities but also extend to their experiences within the royal family. Both women faced intense media scrutiny and public pressure, often feeling isolated and unsupported by the institution. Harry has been vocal about the negative impact of the relentless media attention on both Meghan and Diana, citing it as a significant factor in his decision to step back from royal duties.

 

 

 

Harry’s disappointment is compounded by his belief that recognizing the similarities between Meghan and Diana could foster a deeper appreciation and support for Meghan within the royal family. He has often pointed out that just as Diana revolutionized the royal approach to charity and public engagement, Meghan too has brought a modern and dynamic touch to her royal duties.

The lack of recognition from his family has strained relationships, particularly with his brother William. The once-close brothers have reportedly had heated discussions over Harry’s views, with William remaining unconvinced about the parallels Harry sees.

 

Denise Welch’s stalker, Toraq Wyngard, was jailed for more than seven years on Thursday after leaving the Loose Women star ‘terrified’ after he started a fire in her driveway back in 2020

Denise Welch’s stalker scrawled the words “witch” and “pimp” along with an upside down cross on her front gate, just months after starting a fire in her driveway, a court heard on Thursday.

Toraq Wyngard, 64, was jailed for seven years and seven months on April 7, after the Coronation Street actress described the emotional toll the horrifying experience had on her.

“It has changed my life. I have a wonderful life and this man has permanently scarred it,” the Loose Women star told Chester Crown Court via video-link from America.

The 63-year-old and her husband now spend £2,000 on additional security, the court also heard.

Denise Welch spoke to Chester Crown Court on video link ( 
Image:
WireImage,)

Toraq Wyngard has been jailed for seven years and seven months ( 
Image:
PA)

Just before 11pm on September 19 2020, Wyngard started a fire in a skip outside the home Denise shares with her husband, Lincoln Townley, in Wilmslow, Cheshire, the court heard.

Denise, wearing pink-rimmed glasses, pink lipstick and a yellow top, said she was alerted to the fire by her husband’s “piercing scream” when a member of the public knocked on their door after spotting the flames.

Some £4,285 of damage was caused by the blaze, which spread to the garage attached to the couple’s house.

Denise and her husband found the words “witch” and “pimp” scrawled on their front gate ( 
Image:
ITV)
Gareth Bellis, prosecuting, said CCTV showed a man in a distinctive baseball cap looking around the property before appearing to pour an accelerant into the skip and set it alight.

Wyngard was later arrested nearby wearing the cap, covered in metallic pin badges, and police discovered a 4in (10cm) kitchen knife in his rucksack.

He claimed to be a press photographer and police found two cameras in his bag.

Officers also found a number of cameras, both normal and covert, and binoculars during a search of his home address.

The actress is known for her appearances on Loose Women ( 
Image:
ITV)Several months after, on February 10 2021, while Wyngard was released under investigation, Denise and her husband discovered the words “Witch” and “Pimp” along with an upside-down cross had been scrawled on their front gate in blue marker pen, the court was told.

CCTV showed Wyngard writing the graffiti and he was captured on CCTV at a nearby shop buying the pen.

Mr Bellis said: “These actions caused serious alarm and distress and had a substantial adverse affect on the Townleys and their day-to-day activities.”

Denise told the court: “This whole experience terrified me and continues to do so.”

Denise with her husband Lincoln Townley ( 
Image:
Getty Images)

Denise Welch said her life had been “permanently scarred” by her stalker ( 
Image:
WireImage)
Wyngard, of Cannon Street in Salford, Greater Manchester, pleaded guilty at a hearing last September to stalking, causing serious alarm or distress, between September 18 2020 and February 11 2021.

He also admitted charges of possession of a knife, criminal damage, and arson.

His sentencing was delayed after he later attempted to change his pleas, claiming he had been “pressured” into admitting the offences, the court heard.

His application to change his pleas was rejected but Louise Cowen, defending, said Wyngard maintained he was not guilty.

Denise Welch has appeared on Hollyoaks and Coronation Street

She said he suffered from bipolar affective disorder and had been failing to take his medication.

Sentencing Wyngard, Judge Michael Leeming said: “It is not clear to me, given your attitude to this case, your attempt to vacate your guilty pleas without any proper foundation, and your repeated, continued denials of any criminality, when the risk you pose to Mr and Mrs Townley might reduce to such an extent that the order is no longer required.”

He also made Wyngard subject to a restraining order, with conditions including not to enter Wilmslow.

Friday’s episode of Loose Women saw Nadia Sawalha share her delight at the news that Boots have decided to remove the signs ‘Feminine Hygiene’ from their stores later this year

Loose Women fans were not impressed with Sunetra Sarker as they tuned into Friday’s show.

The latest episode of the ITV show saw panelist Nadia Sawalha mention that Boots have announced they will be removing signs for ‘feminine hygiene’ from their stores.

“I’m really excited about this,” she said. “They are no longer going to call sanitary products ‘Feminine Hygiene’ and then later in the year, also in the aisles of the shop, it’s going to be called ‘Period Products’. Hallelujah!

“People have been campaigning for this

“Really? I disagree,” Sunetra quickly fired back, before adding: “I like it. Female Hygiene is for a lot of things which cover periods and everything to do with what I don’t want to actually tell everyone about all the time.

Sunetra Sarker and Nadia Sawalha clashed on Friday’s episode of Loose Women
“If I’m with my son, say he’s aged 12 or 13, and I’m bringing him down the period aisle, I’m letting him know – which is maybe not something i would necessarily always want him to know.

“Also, I think there’s a girl code about talking about periods. We all talk about it but inviting that aisle to say ‘Period Aisle’ makes me feel a little bit outed,” she added.

“I’m so shocked!” Nadia replied. “Because if your son is in the period aisle, the period is like the very force of woman, the brilliance of us. Your son wouldn’t be here without your period!”

Sunetra doesn’t agree with Boots changing their Feminine Hygiene signs in their stores
“I understand that, that’s not the problem, the problem is labelling it,” Sunetra responded as Nadia butted in saying: “No, telling the truth of what it is!”

“I might not want to share that information with everyone that’s watching me, and I think there’s still a stigma in me that likes knowing when it’s mine…” Sunetra then said as Nadia continue to look gobsmacked.

Viewers tuning in at home were not impressed with Sunetra’s comments and took to Twitter to comment.

One person posted: “this woman in green is making me angry #loosewomen no way should we feel embarrassed about it being called period products. shut up.”

The Loose Women panel were divided when it came to the stigma of periodsSomeone else tweeted: “why should there be such a taboo around period products and talking about periods? they’re a part of every day life & they’re only natural, time to get rid of the stigma!! #LooseWomen.”

A third viewer commented: “As a man, I am baffled by why women don’t want to mention periods. It’s actually annoying that they don’t tell you about it, I don’t want to be ignorant. Half the population have them, it’s normal, it’s not shameful or dirty or anything. #LooseWomen @loosewomen.”

Someone else posted: “It shouldn’t be feminine hygiene because nothing about your period is unhygienic, periods say exactly what it is, we shouldn’t ever be ashamed of having periods and we need to be inclusive of all those who bleed. #LooseWomen.”

They Don’t Own Any Mansion! Aussie Tv Hosts Call Out Harry And Meghan LIARS Over Fake Royal Home

They Don’t Have Any Mansion! Aussie Tv Hosts Call Out Harry And Meghan Over FAKE Netflix Home

For those who may not be aware, Harry and Meghan signed a massive reported $100 million dollar deal with Netflix back in 2020 to produce content for the streaming platform. One of their first projects together would be this documentary, which has been titled “Harry & Meghan.” In the documentary, Netflix was allowed behind the scenes access to film Harry and Meghan in their private homes as well as showing private family footage and interviews.

However, one claim that has come into question from Australian television personalities is around the home that Netflix filmed Harry and Meghan in for portions of the documentary. In several scenes, Harry and Meghan are shown walking around an impressive looking mansion style home located in California. The Netflix description implied that this was Harry and Meghan’s private family home.

However, Sunrise hosts David Koch and Natalie Barr have cast major doubts over whether this mansion is actually Harry and Meghan’s real home. On their morning program, the hosts discussed how they did some investigating into the property that was featured. Kochie and Barr discovered through public records that the mansion seen in the Netflix documentary is not owned by Harry or Meghan at all. In fact, it belongs to a private wealthy businessman located in the area.

Prince Harry’s Reaction to Alleged Images from Meghan Markle’s First Wedding: Unveiling the Past

In recent news, a set of images has surfaced, purportedly showing Meghan Markle at what is believed to be her first wedding. The images, capturing a joyful and intimate moment, have stirred curiosity and speculation about Meghan’s life before her marriage to Prince Harry. As the images circulate online, they raise questions about the couple’s transparency and the potential impact on their public image.

 

Before meeting Prince Harry, Meghan Markle was married to Trevor Engelson, a film producer. The couple tied the knot in a low-key ceremony in Jamaica in 2011, following a long relationship. However, their marriage ended in divorce in 2013, citing irreconcilable differences. This was well-known to the public when Meghan and Harry’s relationship became serious, and it did not appear to overshadow the positive narrative around their union.

 

The emergence of the recent images has sparked rumors that Meghan might have been married before Engelson, suggesting she had two weddings before her relationship with Prince Harry. While Meghan has not publicly acknowledged any marriage prior to Engelson, the images have led to speculation about her past and whether this aspect of her life was disclosed to Prince Harry.

Prince Harry has consistently shown unwavering support for Meghan, defending her against media scrutiny and public criticism. The couple has often emphasized their commitment to privacy and mental well-being, advocating for a balanced portrayal by the press. However, the revelation of these alleged images has reportedly left Harry feeling ‘dark,’ a term suggesting a mix of emotions, possibly including disappointment, confusion, or concern.

It’s important to consider that the nature of the images and the context in which they were taken remain speculative. If Meghan did have a wedding before her marriage to Engelson, it would raise questions about her transparency with Harry, the royal family, and the public. Nonetheless, Harry’s primary focus has always been on supporting Meghan and ensuring her well-being, which he has consistently demonstrated through their shared public statements and appearances.

The public reaction to these developments has been mixed. Some supporters of the couple argue that Meghan’s past should not be scrutinized so heavily, emphasizing that everyone has a history and that it does not diminish her current relationship with Harry. They highlight the importance of focusing on the couple’s present and future rather than dwelling on past events.

Conversely, critics argue that if the images are genuine, they represent a significant omission in Meghan’s narrative about her past. This could potentially undermine the couple’s credibility, especially given their outspoken stance on honesty and transparency. The media, often divided in its portrayal of Meghan and Harry, has taken various approaches, from sensational headlines to more measured analysis.

It is crucial to approach these revelations with a balanced perspective. Meghan Markle’s journey, like anyone’s, is complex and multifaceted. The pressure of public life, especially as a member of the British royal family, can amplify personal matters beyond their actual significance. The narrative surrounding Meghan and Harry has often been polarized, with intense scrutiny from both supporters and detractors.

The couple’s decision to step back from royal duties and their continued advocacy for mental health awareness and media ethics indicate their desire to control their narrative. Whether or not these images represent a new facet of Meghan’s past, they do not necessarily define her present or future. What remains evident is the couple’s commitment to each other and their shared goals.

The emergence of these alleged wedding images highlights the complexities of public life and the challenges of maintaining privacy. As Prince Harry and Meghan Markle continue to navigate their lives under public scrutiny, their ability to address such issues with grace and resilience will be crucial. Regardless of the veracity of the images, the couple’s focus on mutual support and advocacy for personal well-being remains their defining narrative.

In an era where personal histories are often publicized and scrutinized, the response to these revelations will likely reflect broader societal attitudes towards privacy, transparency, and the evolving role of the media in shaping public perceptions.

After seeing Tess Daly’s husband in the Strictly audience at the TV studios in Hertfordshire last night, some fans complained about not being able to get tickets to watch the show

Strictly Come Dancing fans spotted a recognisable face among the audience during the BBC show on Saturday night, with one left wondering if it was “bring your husband to work day”.

Fans of the dance series saw Tess Daly’s husband Vernon Kay, 50, sitting in the first row at Elstree Film and Television Studios in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, last night. A screenshot shared on X, formerly called Twitter, shows the BBC Radio 2 presenter, dressed in an all-white outfit paired with a light brown jacket, smiling as he looks at his wife Tess.

The Strictly presenter, 55, wore an elegant sparkly blue dress as she introduced the celebrities taking to the dance floor. Sharing an image that shows Vernon among members of the public, a person wrote on X: “Bring ur husband to work day I assume.”

Fans spotted Tess Daly’s husband Vernon Kay in the audience last night ( 
Image:
BBC)
Some people in the comment section said they had also spotted Vernon, with one writing: “Spotted him making faces as she talked.” Another commented: “He’s a proud husband.”

But some complained about Vernon being there, saying this contributes to members of the public not being able to get tickets to watch the show live. A person said: “I’ve never managed to get a ticket from series 1.” One more tweeted: “Glad he managed to get a ticket in the ballot.”

Two weeks ago, after the first Strictly live show, Tess was spotted with her eldest daughter as they headed home in a taxi. Tess, 55, looked in high spirits after receiving support from her daughter Phoebe, 19. The cherished TV star also has another daughter, Amber, born in 2004, whom she shares with her husband Vernon. The mum-of-two looked stunning in the red jumpsuit she wore for the show, while Phoebe looked chic in a white outfit.

On the show last night, Tess and co-presenter Claudia Winkleman addressed Nick Knowles’ sudden exit from the show. Telly favourite Nick, 62, was forced to pull out of the live show on Saturday after sustaining another injury. Nick and professional dancer partner Luba Mushtuk were due to perform the Charleston to Rain On The Roof from the film Paddington 2 for the Movie Week special.

Nick had already suffered a shoulder injury that left him in a sling, just days after the first live show. But it was reported on Friday that the DIY SOS star fell and injured his knee during a dress rehearsal, and is now using crutches to walk. During the live episode on Saturday night hosts Tess and Claudia were quick to speak out about Nick’s absence.

Tess said: “As you can see, Nick Knowles and his partner Luba are not here. In rehearsals yesterday, Nick sustained an injury and is not able to perform tonight.” Claudia then said: “As per rules of the competition, he will receive a bye into next week’s show. Nick we are sending you love and wishing you a speedy recovery.”

The Loose Women studio erupted into heated debate on Thursday as Linda Robson defended Boris Johnson’s refusal to resign after the PM was slapped with a Partygate fine

The Loose Women studio erupted into heated debate over Boris Johnson’s refusal to resign after he was fined over a lockdown birthday bash in No10.

The PM apologised for the lockdown-breaching party, which was reportedly organised for him by his wife, and confirmed he had paid the fine after previously saying he had ‘followed the rules’.

Loose Women panelists Kaye Adams, Sunetra Sarker, Nadia Sawalha and Linda Robson turned to the topic at the beginning of Thursday’s instalment of the ITV daytime show.

Nadia immediately pushed back at fellow presenter Denise Welch’s comments on the previous day’s show that Boris Johnson should not have to resign as a result of the police fine.

Linda replied by stressing that the PM did not organise the party himself, adding: “He nearly died a couple of weeks before, he’d been in hospital with Covid. He made a mistake.”

Linda replied by stressing that the PM did not organise the party himself ( 
Image:
ITV)
Kaye was quick to respond as the atmosphere became tense, saying: “Linda, this is a man who’s a leader. Leader’s should lead. They should not make excuses for getting it wrong. Leaders should show an example, have integrity, do what they say.”

Linda replied: “They were meeting everyday to discuss what was going on in the country anyway,” to which Kaye quickly questioned: “Why do you want to make excuses?”

Linda continued, defensively, saying: “There’s nothing we can compare this to. Nothing like this has ever happened to us in all these years.”

Sunetra then weighed in, telling Linda: “That’s why it’s so serious. This has never happened to us before. Lockdown was brand new. So, it was that serious.”

Kaye was quick to respond as the atmosphere became tense ( 
Image:
ITV)
Nadia added: “This has hurt a lot of people and for the Tories to keep telling us we’ve just got to get over it because it was two years ago is not on.”

After getting some stick from her co-stars, Linda replied saying that she “totally understands” that people lost loved ones during lockdown, but again returned to the fact that Boris Johnson had not organised the party himself.

The Loose Women studio erupted into heated debate over Boris Johnson’s refusal to resign ( 
Image:
ITV)
She said: “They just brought in a cake for him and said happy birthday. It was the people around him that organised it.”

Nadia then said: “What do you think about all the times he stood in the Houses of Parliament and said no rules were broken? The rest of the world will look at our dishonest government and wonder how we put up with it. It’s embarrassing.”

Kaye quickly questioned: “Why do you want to make excuses?”Linda replied: “He just went in for a meeting. He thought he was going to talk about what was going on in the country. He didn’t bring the cake, he didn’t organise the party.”

Linda then noted the PM has paid the £50 fixed penalty notice yesterday that was issued for a June 2020 birthday bash in his honour.

Sunetra then simmered down the heated conversation, saying: “We can’t pile this all on Linda. I get what you’re saying in some respects because the party itself sounds petty. But he’s been caught over and over again.”

As King Charles looks to redefine the monarchy, Duchess Sophie and her husband Prince Edward are reportedly at the center of significant changes involving royal residences and family dynamics. Recent reports indicate that the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh are potential candidates to move into Royal Lodge, the current residence of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson. This shift would mark a notable change, as King Charles is said to be eager to reassign the property. The king aims to relocate the Duke of York to Frogmore Cottage, previously the home of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. However, Prince Andrew, who’s resided at Royal Lodge since 2003, is reportedly reluctant to leave his 30-room mansion, citing a 75-year lease and the estate’s historical significance as reasons for staying.

 

Sources suggest that Sophie and Edward could take over Royal Lodge, with Sophie described as a serious contender for this role. An insider told Women’s Day magazine that Sophie and Edward’s potential move has complicated the situation, prompting King Charles to address his plan openly. This has led to a tense atmosphere, with rumors of a possible intervention by Prince William if the issue is not resolved soon. Royal author Gareth Russell has also noted that while The Prince and Princess of Wales might seem like a natural choice, they’ve shown little interest in moving, making the Edinburgh couple a more viable option.

 

King Charles’s intentions extend beyond just reshuffling residences. The king is reportedly concerned about ensuring that Queen Camilla has a secure home for the future. As a result, he wishes to establish a stable residence for her in Windsor, potentially involving Sophie and Edward as caretakers of Royal Lodge. This plan reflects the king’s desire to provide for Camilla’s well-being after his passing. Prince Andrew’s desire to keep Royal Lodge as an inheritance for his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, has added to the complex dynamics. The Duke of York and Sarah Ferguson were allowed to remain in Royal Lodge following the Duchess of York’s cancer diagnosis in 2023. Nevertheless, the king’s push to finalize the relocation underscores the ongoing tensions within the royal family.

The Duchess of Edinburgh’s involvement in royal affairs extends beyond property matters. Sophie reportedly faced a snub from Meghan Markle, despite her attempts to offer support as a fellow outsider who joined the royal family in 1999. Sophie hoped to mentor Meghan, who was navigating her new royal role. According to a source, Sophie and Meghan had an extensive conversation where Sophie offered valuable advice on transitioning into royal life. Sophie found Meghan engaging and offered her support but was surprised when Meghan didn’t reciprocate or follow up. The Duchess had hoped for a return invitation to Frogmore Cottage, where Meghan and Harry were residing at the time. Some royal commentators suggest that Meghan may have felt that she didn’t need additional guidance, relying instead on Prince Harry.

 

This sentiment was echoed by commentator Kinsey Schofield, who noted that Meghan’s rejection of Sophie’s mentorship opportunity might have been a missed chance for learning. The queen had recommended Sophie as a mentor for Meghan, believing that she’d be an ideal guide through the complexities of royal life. Meghan’s decision to decline this offer and rely on Harry instead may have deprived her of valuable insights. According to Schofield, Sophie’s genuine intention to assist Meghan was overlooked, marking a missed opportunity for both women to build a supportive relationship. Duchess Sophie is becoming an influential figure in the evolving royal landscape. Her potential role at Royal Lodge and her past attempts to support Meghan Markle highlight her significant, albeit complex, involvement in the monarchy’s future.

Loose Women stars Kaye Adams, Nadia Sawalha and Sunetra Sarker were discussing calories being printed on restaurant menus when Lady Leshurr opened up about her own weight gain

The Loose Women ladies were shocked on Friday’s show when new panelist Lady Leshurr admitted she is trying to put weight on.

Kaye Adams, Nadia Sawalha and Sunetra Sarker were joined by Lady Leshurr as they discussed calories now appearing on menus in restaurants.

Kaye, 59, kicked off the conversation by telling her co-stars that she and her daughter were counting calories when they went out for dinner earlier this week.

“It was such a strange thing for me, because this first was raised a couple of years ago as an idea, and at that point I remember thinking, ‘I think that’s a really good idea’,” Kaye explained.

The Loose Women ladies were shocked on Friday’s show when Lady Leshurr admitted she is trying to put weight on ( 
Image:
ITV)

“But I sat down with her and she’s 19 and it was there and the only thing she looked at was the numbers and then I did the same thing and I suddenly went, ‘woah I don’t think this is a good idea’.”

Nadia, 57, went on to say that she thinks “it’s a huge step back” as she spoke about constantly counting calories in the past.

Lady Leshurr was sat on the Loose Women panel alongside Nadia Sawalha ( 
Image:
ITV)
Lady Leshurr, real name Melesha Katrina O’Garro, then said: “I reckon the waiters in every restaurant should come through with like, ‘do you want a calories menu or no calories menu?’ so you don’t get to see it if you don’t want to.

“Because, for me, it’s like I know someone that is very like, ‘Oh I can’t have that and that and I can’t drink tonight because then I’m gonna have to go to the gym’, it gives me anxiety but then I’m the opposite because I’m trying to put on weight,” she continued.

The 34-year-old rapper joked that her clothes are ‘falling’ off of her ( 
Image:
ITV)

At that point, the rest of the panel were heard gasping as Sunetra replied: “What?!”

“Look at me! How can you question what? Look at me! My clothes are falling off me!” Lady Leshurr joked.

She then explained: “In general, I don’t ever look at what I’m eating and I’ve got a fast metabolism, which is good.”

Lady Leshurr went on to say that sometimes people call her a “lucky bugger” for being able to eat what she wants, but she then stressed: “I really do want to put on weight!”