NEW QUEEN, King Charles CROWNS Princess Anne As NEW Queen As Camilla Not Good Enough In a stunning turn of events that has the world buzzing, King Charles III has made a move that few anticipated: he has crowned his sister, Princess Anne, as the new queen. This unexpected decision has sparked a whirlwind of conversations, debates, and even some playful gossip about the royal family. So, grab your crown emoji and settle in as we dive into this captivating royal saga!

All the fans of Princess Anne departed from the Commonwealth Day service expressing the same sentiment.

Princess Anne’s devoted followers were left mesmerized by her impeccable style when she graced the Commonwealth Day service with her presence.

The Princess Royal, at the age of 73, effortlessly stole the show with her choice of attire, leaving her fans in a state of awe.

Donning a stunning red cashmere coat, Anne’s outfit was hailed as nothing short of “beautiful” by her adoring supporters.

With a radiant smile on her face, the sister of King Charles gracefully entered Westminster Abbey, waving to the eager crowd who eagerly awaited a glimpse of royalty.



This knee-length Shibumi coat, priced at £395, had previously been spotted on Anne during a public appearance in Canada last year, showcasing her impeccable taste in fashion.

During the service, Princess Anne was accompanied by her trusted confidante, Dolly Maude, who is often referred to as Zara Tindall’s “right hand woman.”

Dolly, aged 51, exuded elegance in a chic tweed coat dress adorned with striking gold buttons, complemented by a headpiece that perfectly matched her ensemble.

Anne donned the extravagant £395 coat, effortlessly draping it over her teal dress that gracefully fell below her knees. To complete the ensemble, she adorned a matching top hat, adorned with a vibrant red ribbon that elegantly tied the entire look together.



Fans couldn’t help but gush over Princess Anne’s regal and sophisticated appearance. One admirer took to social media platform X, expressing their admiration for the beautiful coat and Anne’s impeccable coordination of her outfits.

Another fan simply marveled at the stunning picture of Princess Anne, while a third admirer succinctly described her as “gorgeous.”

Among Princess Anne’s esteemed entourage of Ladies-in-Waiting is the recently appointed Dolly Maude. As a Lady-in-Waiting, Dolly’s duties include accompanying the Princess Royal to various royal engagements. This 73-year-old woman is rumored to be one of eleven Ladies-in-Waiting serving Princess Anne. Dolly shares a close friendship with Anne’s daughter, Zara Tindall, and even had the privilege of being present during the birth of Zara’s son, Lucas.

Princess Anne makes rare comment about Camilla’s reign as Queen

Princess Royal praised Camilla’s ‘understanding of the role’ despite not being a ‘natural’ fit for it

Princess Anne has made a rare comment about Camilla’s reign as queen in a new BBC documentary examining King Charles’s first year as monarch.

The documentary, which will air on Boxing Day (26 December), promises to offer viewers a “behind-the-scenes” look at Charles’s first year as Britain’s new monarch after his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, died last September.

It features interviews with members of the royal family, including Princess Anne who has, for the first time, spoken about Camilla’s relationship with the throne – praising her sister-in-law’s “understanding of the role” as the nation’s queen despite not being a “natural” fit for it.

The Princess Royal, 73, said: “I’ve known [Camilla] a long time off and on. Her understanding of the role and how much difference it makes to the king has been absolutely outstanding.

“This role is not something that she’d be a natural for but she does it really well. She provides that change of speed and tone, that’s equally important,” Anne added.

Charles met Camilla Parker Bowles in 1970 at a polo match, after being introduced by Anne.

When she met Britain’s future king, Camilla famously remarked: “My great-grandmother was the mistress of your great-great-grandfather.

“I feel we have something in common.”

At the time, Anne was romantically linked to British military officer Andrew Parker Bowles, Camilla’s future husband, who the now-queen married in a Roman Catholic ceremony in 1973.

Charles would go on to marry Diana, Princess of Wales, in July 1981. Five years later, his affair with ex-girlfriend Camilla was reignited, eventually leading to Charles and Diana announcing their separation in 1992.

They announced their engagement in February 2005 before tying the knot at Windsor Guildhall on 8 April 2005 – 35 years after their first meeting.

Elsewhere in the new documentary, Charles III: The Coronation Year, Camilla’s sister Annabel Elliot described the king and queen as “yin and yang” – meaning two opposite parts of one complementary whole.

Elliot, who was one of Camilla’s two Ladies in Attendance at the coronation in May, reportedly said the king and queen are “polar opposites” but their relationship works “brilliantly” because they add value to each other’s lives in different ways.

She said: “[Camilla] is his rock, and I can’t actually emphasise that enough. She’s somebody who is completely loyal and she isn’t somebody who has huge highs and lows.”

Meanwhile, Charles’s interest and knowledge in a wide variety of subjects has enriched Camilla’s life, Elliot added.

According to a report, King Charles, at the age of 75, is revealing significant truths about royal conflicts. As King Charles commemorates his 75th year, the British monarchy is at a pivotal juncture. There is an increasing recognition of the internal strife inside the royal circle and the ever-changing dynamics.

The recent discord between King Charles and Queen Camilla has shown the continuing issues, notably with Prince William’s ambitious goals for the monarchy and the increasing importance of Princess Catherine.

The findings have profoundly unsettled both the public and the media, particularly in conjunction with King Charles’s unexpected admission of culpability regarding Princess Diana, resulting in considerable turmoil.

The conflict between Charles and Camilla

Reports indicate that King Charles is incensed by Queen Camilla’s response to Prince William’s strategic vision about the monarchy. Sources within the royal circle indicate that Camilla’s opposition to William’s proposals for elevating Princess Catherine’s status has created considerable strain. Throughout royal history, Camilla has played a significant role in the royal family hierarchy; nevertheless, the transfer of authority to Princess Catherine has encountered several challenges.

Reliable sources inside the company have claimed that Camilla has expressed her discontent with the alteration, seeing them as a diminishment of her contributions. This discord has not only damaged her relationship with King Charles but has also revealed the latent power conflicts within the royal family.

King Charles harbors remorse over Princess Diana

King Charles has made a rare and candid remark expressing his profound sadness for Princess Diana’s loss. The death of Diana in 1997 has generated an incessant flow of queries and debates. Although the royal family has remained resolutely quiet for many years, King Charles’s sudden acknowledgment illuminates the circumstances that prevailed before the disaster.

A friend of the king said that Charles feels distressed by his involvement in the collapse of his marriage to Diana and the consequent effects on her life. This revelation is not only startling but extremely impactful, considering it comes from an individual often seen as emotionally aloof. This signifies profound guilt that has likely impacted his relationships and choices throughout his life.

The initial phase of Charles and Diana’s relationship

Charles and Diana started their courtship in 1981, captivating the world with their love narrative. Nevertheless, the truth was somewhat more complex. Diana was around 16 years old when Charles first saw her at the Spencer family residence in Althorpe. At that time, Charles was 29 years of age. Notwithstanding the considerable age disparity and Charles’s prior relationship with Diana’s elder sister, Sarah Spencer, the bond between Charles and Diana intensified over time.

Their relationship was characterized by public intrigue and intimate strife. Charles’s notorious comment at the conclusion of their engagement interview—in which he replied to an inquiry about love with “whatever love means”—foreshadowed the fundamental problems that would subsequently afflict their marriage.

The nuptial ceremony marks the beginning of the conjugal marriage

Charles and Diana tied the knot on July 29, 1981, a momentous occasion for the entire world. The splendor of St. Paul’s Cathedral and Diana’s exquisite ivory silk taida gown, adorned with over 10,000 pearls, captivated millions. Nevertheless, apprehensions and inquiries persisted under the surface.

Diana found a bracelet for Camilla Parker Bowles shortly before the wedding. This revelation foreshadowed the next problems. The pair appeared calm despite initial pain symptoms. Their three-month honeymoon, with a visit to Balmoral Castle and a trip on the Royal warship Britannia, seemed to reinforce their connection.

It quickly became apparent that Diana struggled with feelings of inadequacy and the many obligations that come with being a princess.

The events surrounding Prince William and Harry’s births

The birth of Prince William on June 21, 1982, was a significant event for the royal couple. Diana’s choice to deliver in St. Mary’s Hospital in London, with Charles present in the delivery room, was a break from royal tradition and exhibited a contemporary perspective on fatherhood.

The birth of their second son, Prince Harry, exposed previously hidden tensions. Charles’s renewed communication with Camilla and his discontent with their lack of a daughter exacerbated the strain in their marriage. Diana’s 1989 meeting with Camilla—a bold attempt to save her marriage—eventually failed and revealed the significant divisions between them.

Owing to the discord and contention, the royal couple’s public image suffered significant harm due to the Camillagate controversy in 1989. This controversy revealed private discussions between Charles and Camilla. Charles acknowledged his adultery in a broadcast interview with Jonathan Dimbleby, and Diana’s forthright revelations during her 1995 Panorama interview illuminated the complexities of their tumultuous marriage.

Both the formal declaration of their divorce in 1996 and the ensuing news of their separation in 1992 were pivotal events for the monarchy, alongside Diana’s considerable income and her ongoing use of the title Princess of Wales. The financial and custody arrangements garnered significant media attention.

Life following the dissolution of their partnership

Following their marriage’s dissolution, Diana and Charles pursued divergent paths post-divorce. A stark difference existed between Charles’s ongoing royal duties and his public connection with Camilla, in contrast to Diana’s charity endeavors and private associations, particularly her romance with Dr. Hasnat Khan.

The sad death of Princess Diana in 1997, under contentious circumstances, cast a significant shadow on the royal family.

Camilla responds to Charles’s acknowledgment of accountability

Queen Camilla has shown astonishment and anguish in reply to King Charles’s latest announcement. According to royal family sources, Camilla was reportedly astonished by Charles’s public acknowledgment of culpability for Diana’s death. Furthermore, Camilla’s declaration has scrutinized her position within the royal narrative, resurrecting past grievances.

There is polarization in the public’s perspectives on this topic. Some individuals believe that Charles’s revelation is an essential progression towards healing and transparency, but others see it as a betrayal of Camilla, who has supported him through years of public scrutiny and personal challenges.

The public’s reaction to these discoveries has been both favorable and unfavorable. A multitude of individuals have sent their condolences for Charles, recognizing the emotional weight he has borne for several years. Critics, meanwhile, attribute guilt to him for failing to handle these concerns promptly and for the distress his actions inflicted on Diana.

Officials tasked with royal affairs have analyzed the ramifications of Charles’s admission. Robert Lacey, a historian specializing in royal history, posits that this acknowledgment may serve as a deliberate maneuver to foster popular support and enhance the monarchy’s accessibility. Lacey explains that Charles is striving to redefine his legacy and establish a monarchy that is more open and approachable by recognizing his previous errors.

Penny Junor, a royal biographer, argues that the revelation may affect Charles’s relationship with Camilla. Camilla has faced much public criticism and has tried to gain acceptance by making significant efforts. Junor observes that this disclosure might jeopardize her objectives and resurrect previous difficulties.

Prince William’s enhanced responsibility

Prince William’s enhanced responsibility includes modernizing the monarchy’s image and tackling long-standing challenges. Princess Katherine’s significant involvement symbolizes this transition. Katherine has emerged as an indispensable asset to the royal family due to her extensive popularity and aptitude for engaging in talks with people.

During the transition of Camilla’s power to Catherine, problems arose. The initial reluctance of Camilla and the ensuing discord with King Charles underscore the intricacies of managing royal relationships. The intricate equilibrium between modernity and tradition is a continually growing challenge as the monarchy progresses.

In his 75th year, King Charles has been characterized by many significant disclosures and internal controversies. His steadfast opposition to Queen Camilla, coupled with his frank acknowledgment of responsibility regarding Princess Diana, indicates his prolonged worry about the matter.

The sustainability of the monarchy relies on Prince William and Princess Katherine’s capacity to manage significant responsibilities and reshape the royal family’s narrative. The diverse perspectives of the public and specialists on these changes illuminate the complexities of royal existence.

Some saw Charles’s confession as a first step towards rehabilitation, while others viewed it as a potential catalyst for further discord. The interplay between tradition and modernity will profoundly influence the evolution of the royal dynasty, eventually shaping its future trajectory.

The journey of King Charles illustrates the persistent intricacies of love, duty, and atonement within the monarchy. Over time, historical lessons will surely shape the monarchy’s trajectory towards a more open and accessible future for the people.

Ashley Hansen, the Sussexes’ PR chief for more than two years, is leaving her position to set up her own public relations firm.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s global press secretary has announced that she will be stepping down from her role.

Ashley Hansen, the couple’s PR chief for more than two years, is leaving her position to set up her own public relations firm.

According to a statement, the Sussexes will become Hansen’s first clients at her LA-based consulting firm, Three Gate Strategies.
Hansen will continue to represent and advise Harry and Meghan, whilst providing oversight to their international communications team.

Commenting on the change, Meghan said in a statement: “We are so proud of Ashley, especially as a female entrepreneur.

“We look forward to having her focused expertise on our business and creative projects and her continued oversight of our communications team.

“My husband and I are excited to be alongside Ashley as she builds something extraordinarily special with her firm.”

Hansen said: “I am incredibly grateful to The Duke and Duchess for their continued trust in me. Their unwavering support and belief in my new firm has been meaningful and is a testament to their leadership.

“I knew when they first hired me that they were giving me the opportunity of a lifetime and I couldn’t be happier to continue working together.”

Despite the gushing words from both sides, Hansen is the 19th person to have quit working for the Sussexes, following Josh Kettler who quit as their chief of staff in August after just three months.

Hansen’s firm Three Gates Strategies will specialise in communications and brand management for distinguished individuals and organisations.

Her client roster will include high-profile individuals across entertainment, tech, and finance.

Hansen recently jumped to the Duchess’ defence following an article in the Hollywood Reporter last month that called Meghan ‘Duchess Difficult’ and accused her of reducing grown men to tears.

Hansen said the Sussexes treated her with “the kind of concern and care a parent would express if it were their own child” when she took time off for surgery, adding that the couple also sent flowers and gifts.

“Meghan would personally reach out to my husband daily to make sure that we both were OK and had support. It meant so much to him and even more to me. You don’t realise how much that kind of kindness and thought means until you need it,” she said.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s recent tour of Colombia was deemed a success (Image: Getty)

The news comes as Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are set to mark World Mental Health Day next week in a rather different fashion to previous years.

Last year, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex held their Archewell Foundation’s first in-person event in New York, providing a platform for parents navigating mental health challenges in today’s digital age.

However, this year’s global milestone, which takes place on October 10, will highlight “mental health in the workplace” which will inevitably shine a light on recent stories surrounding the Duchess that described her as a “demon” boss.

“Let’s just say the timing of the ‘demon’ boss article about Meghan hasn’t come at a very good time,” said the source. “World Mental Health Day this year is to help shine a light on mental health in the workplace so it’s a very tricky one for the Sussexes to navigate.

“It’s a scenario where they will be damned if they do and damned if they don’t.

“They obviously advocate for mental health awareness so the day will be marked in some way but not like it has been in previous years with a big event.”

The allegations involving Prince Andrew and his potential connection to the ongoing scandal surrounding Sean “Diddy” Combs have generated substantial media attention.

A recent report claims that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are supposedly “gleeful” at the news of Prince Andrew’s involvement in these scandals.

The report suggests that the Sussexes, often in conflict with the royal family, might see this as an opportunity to vindicate their decision to leave royal duties and distance themselves from the monarchy.

However, it’s important to note that this claim remains speculative, with no concrete evidence supporting the idea that Harry and Meghan have responded to the scandal in such a way.

The scandal concerning Prince Andrew has been a long-standing issue for the royal family, particularly since his infamous association with Jeffrey Epstein. After stepping back from royal duties in 2019 following his disastrous BBC Newsnight interview, Andrew has largely been out of the public eye. His involvement in the Epstein scandal severely damaged his reputation and standing within the royal family, and resurfaced accusations tied to other figures, such as R&B singer Jaguar Wright, have brought Andrew back into the spotlight.

Harry and Meghan have often been critical of the royal institution, citing a toxic environment and media intrusion as reasons for stepping away from their official duties. Allegedly, some insiders suggest that the Sussexes might see Andrew’s latest scandal as further justification for their decision to distance themselves from the royal family. However, this is largely based on speculation, and it’s unclear if Harry and Meghan have even commented on the matter.

In contrast, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have continued their public and philanthropic work, with Prince Harry notably focusing on mental health advocacy, youth empowerment, and conservation efforts. Their decision to leave the monarchy, often characterized by controversy, seems to have little connection to Prince Andrew’s ongoing scandals beyond broader discussions around the monarchy’s handling of difficult issues.

It’s also worth mentioning that recent comments from a royal aide appear to serve as a cautionary tale for Prince Harry. This anonymous aide drew parallels between Andrew’s downfall and Harry’s own situation, warning that spares like Andrew and Harry must be mindful of their behavior and the people advising them. They highlighted the need for individuals in such positions to maintain decorum, while also acknowledging the significant pressures and criticisms both princes have faced.

In short, while Prince Andrew’s ongoing scandals continue to cast a shadow on the royal family, claims that Prince Harry and Meghan are “gleeful” about his troubles seem speculative at best. The Sussexes have maintained a relatively low profile in relation to this issue, and it is unclear how they view Andrew’s situation or if it has any bearing on their own relationship with the monarchy.

The events surrounding Meghan Markle’s alleged pregnancy and Archie’s birth are surrounded by contradictions to the official story.

Meghan’s father recently made claims about her having a hysterectomy, sparking speculation that she might have used surrogacy. These doubts have been fueled by allegations of Meghan using a prosthetic pregnancy bump, which was allegedly seen slipping in public.

Meghan’s decision to give birth in a non-traditional hospital, the reports about the timing of Archie’s home delivery, and Harry being spotted in public soon after all break from royal norms.

Archie’s first public appearance, wrapped tightly in a blanket, raised skepticism since there was no clear view of him. The Sussexes have released only manipulated photos showing the Queen holding Archie and another of him with his back to us, which some believe could have been taken from Google Images.

The absence of public christening photos and details about Archie’s social life further fuels suspicion. The apparent secrecy extends to the missing name of one of the doctors who supposedly helped deliver Archie, adding to the whispers and doubts.

These pieces signal a departure from typical royal behavior, leading many to call for transparency. The couple’s frequent travel without their kids, despite claiming personal struggles, raises questions about their parenting priorities.

It seems their children are mentioned only when convenient, unlike other royal families who emphasize family values.

Harry advocates for mental health and parental presence, but his public appearances with his children suggest otherwise. There are concerns about the children’s safety at home due to reports of heavy drinking and drug use.

Competent nannies are hopefully providing a buffer for the children. Ironically, Harry, who condemned his royal upbringing for emotional coldness, might be creating a similar environment for his own children.

Despite their intentions for privacy and normalcy, Meghan and Harry’s actions appear inconsistent with their public declarations.

The secrecy surrounding Meghan’s pregnancies amplifies public disbelief and cynicism. The couple’s intentions seem too perfect, raising doubts about the authenticity of their narratives.

The absence of transparent, joyful scenes typically accompanying royal baby announcements is noticeable. Instead, there are carefully timed reels, more reminiscent of Hollywood film launches than regal announcements.

This lack of transparency disenfranchises their children from their royal heritage, turning their lives into a crafted storyline with Meghan as the director and lead actress.

The ramifications go beyond individual credibility, challenging the centuries-old institution built on hereditary succession. The Queen, having weathered numerous scandals, now faces a challenge arguably lower in stature: an actress treating Buckingham Palace as mere stagecraft.

Meghan and Harry’s actions spread misinformation, casting doubt on the legitimacy of their children and their place in the royal family.

If they did have children, the public’s affection for babies is undeniable, yet it has been a long time since a genuine photo of Archie was shared.

The changing appearance of Archie, from dark brown hair to a surprising red tint, adds to the speculation. Additionally, claims of Meghan’s infertility and Harry’s health issues further complicate the narrative.

The royals presumably finished their investigations into these matters, but the public remains skeptical. If Meghan and Harry lied about their children, the implications are severe, bordering on criminal fraud and treason.

The secrecy around Archie’s birth certificate and the lack of transparency in their children’s lives only deepen the mistrust.

Megan’s unfamiliarity with royal expectations was evident from the start, and her actions have been perceived negatively.

Her exclusion of family members from the wedding, coupled with her public controversies, paints a dubious picture. Her behavior during public appearances with her children often seems odd, adding to the public’s confusion and skepticism.

As Meghan announced her second pregnancy, questions about her gestational process resurfaced. While surrogacy laws in the UK complicate matters, Meghan’s behavior and the lack of transparency continue to fuel speculation.

This long, ongoing soap opera has reached its peak, leaving the public fed up with hearing about Meghan and Harry.

Whether their children exist or not is beside the point; their actions have made it clear that royal life wasn’t for them. It’s baffling that they remain high in the line of succession and use their titles despite their declarations to the contrary.

Meghan and Harry’s persistent dishonesty and manipulation have caused widespread disbelief. If they had been honest about using a surrogate, perhaps more people would have understood.

Instead,

Tom King might have a secret enemy in the Emmerdale village who has worked out his lies about Belle Dingle.

Something someone close to Tom said on Thursday night amid a viewer theory following a recent spoiler may have revealed someone unexpected is onto him. Currently Tom has managed to convince his family and his new flame Amelia Spencer that he’s innocent after accusations of domestic abuse.

He’s claimed he’s the one who has suffered and that Belle’s mental health has seen her act out. When he was caught out for installing cameras in their home, he claimed it was for Belle’s safety.

Belle needs proof that Tom was stalking her and recording her without her consent, while she’s also struggling to prove Tom has been abusing her for months. Tom’s family have accused Belle of lying, unaware of the horrifying truth about Tom.

But a scene on Thursday could change this, as his aunt Nicola King hinted she might be onto him whilst actually defending him. While in the café, she shared her confusion over the situation after Tom’s arrest, and him being questioned once more.

With his iPad being missing, Nicola appeared to share some doubt about Tom’s version of events, while she did insinuate Belle was lying. She told her pal Laurel Thomas, who made it clear she was supporting Belle: “Something doesn’t add up,” as she pointed out that Belle attacked Tom with an axe.

Tom King might have a secret enemy in the Emmerdale village ( 
Image:
ITV)
Fans know that Tom has been abusing Belle for months, with it starting as coercive control before he turned violent. Belle is fighting back, but an incident last week where he threatened to kill her led to her shoving an axe in his back.

He’s now recovering at home and Belle has reported him to the police, as well as confirming what she’d done. But without the evidence she’s facing trouble over the attack.

Nicola’s comment left many viewers wondering if she was finally onto Tom and perhaps was only pretending to be on his side. So could she end up being the one to find the iPad and its contents?

Viewers believe this to be the case, thinking Nicola may have already seen the footage. Others wondered if this would soon happen following her young son Carl stealing the iPad, and perhaps she will realise what’s happened.

One fan posted: “Hope she does the right thing and takes the iPad to them.” Another viewer said: “Nicola will walk in while [the clips] are playing and see it for herself,” as a third wrote: “Nicola will see it.” Another comment said: “Apparently Nicola sees it.”

Nick Knowles is on crutches with a second “painful” Strictly injury – and could be out of the competition despite vowing to dance on crutches if he has to.

The DIY SOS star, 61, said he was “gutted” to pull out of this weekend’s show with a knee injury. It comes just a week after he was only just passed fit to take part because of shoulder problems.

Speaking on BBC TV show It Takes Two, Nick said: “During our rehearsal today… Unfortunately I damaged my knee and it’s quite painful. So the physios have decided I need to go for a MRI (scan).”

His professional partner, Luba Mushtuk added: “Unfortunately we will not be dancing tomorrow but we really, really hope that the knee will be better for next week and we’ll be back on the dancefloor. Fingers crossed, we really hope that we’ll be back and see you guys very soon.”

Nick Knowles has been forced to pull out of Strictly Come Dancing this weekend with professional dancer Luba Mushtuk ( 
Image:
No credit)

Trying to put a brave face on things, Nick added: “Even if we have to glitter up the crutches, I am determined to get back and try and dance for you next week.”

The TV star previously revealed he had sustained an arm and shoulder injury, but received medical clearance to perform on the show last weekend. However, this week he was not so lucky after falling on his knee.

A post to Strictly’s Instagram page said: “Unfortunately, Nick Knowles sustained an injury during rehearsals and as a result, will not dance this weekend. As per the rules of the competition, Nick and Luba (Mushtuk) will receive a bye through to next week when he is hopefully able to dance again. Everyone at Strictly Come Dancing wishes Nick a speedy recovery.”

The 20th anniversary series of Strictly only kicked off a few weeks ago but this is already Nick’s second injury! The DIY guru was seen with his arm in a sling last week, having injured it while changing a car tyre and leaving him with only a few hours to prepare for his dance routine at the weekend.

It’s the second time Nick has been injured ( 
Image:
BBC)
Speaking on BBC’s Morning Live this Tuesday, Nick confirmed that although the injury was still troubling him, there was daily improvement. He optimistically shared, “I’m a lot better. The arm’s getting stronger every day and I’m feeling better. The strength is getting better each day. We’ll need to build this dance a little but around it, but anyway, it’s not an excuse this week I’m either good enough or I’m not.”

Determined to compete, Nick revealed, “We were offered the chance of a bye but I felt like that would be cheating and we really should try and go for it. I spoke to the physios and once that was decided, you just throw yourself into it. The harder you work, the more confidence you gain.”

He concluded with high praise for his dance partner, sayin: “I consider myself incredibly fortunate to have Luba as my teacher, shaping me like a finely-tailored suit which I then make look like I’ve slept in it overnight.”

Nick Knowles has broken his silence after it was revealed he has been forced to drop out of Strictly Come Dancing this weekend.

The 62-year-old DIY SOS icon has been a fan favourite for the 2024 season of the BBC’s long-running dance competition – but was struck with injury at the beginning of the series’s run. Nick, who has built a career out of getting stuck into manual labour, injured his shoulder while fixing a car tyre after the opening episodes of the current 22nd season of Strictly.

There were fears he could not perform last weekend, but medics gave him the all clear hours before the second live show of the year. But now it seems the rigours of training have set the TV star back – and he now won’t be competing in the live show this weekend.

Fans may be especially disappointed to know that it is Movie Week this weekend on the BBC show – and Nick and his dance partner, Luba Mushtuk, 34, had been scheduled to dance the Charleston to the sound of Rain on the Roof; the iconic song from the Stephen Sondheim production Follies which was incorporated into the soundtrack of Paddington 2. Now viewers can only imagine what such a performance would have looked like.

Nick is partnered with Luba Mushtuk on the BBC show ( 
Image:
BBC/Ray Burmiston)

Nick injured his shoulder after the 2024 launch show and rehearsals seem to have aggravated the condition ( 
Image:
Instagram)

Breaking his silence after his absence was announced Nick wrote on X: “I’m absolutely gutted and feeling very very sad,” alongside a sad face emoji.

Earlier, he took to X and Instagram, to share a post by Strictly which confirmed he would be missing out this weekend. The post stated: “Unfortunately, Nick Knowles sustained an injury during rehearsals and as a result, will not dance this weekend. As per the rules of the competition, Nick and Luba will receive a bye through to next week when he is hopefully able to dance again. Everyone at Strictly Come Dancing wishes Nick a speedy recovery.”

Fans were quick to wish Nick a speedy recovery, with one on X writing: “Hope you’re on the mend soon. What a shame you’re missing out on movie week.” Another typed: “So sorry to hear that! I hope you are ok! #Strictly.” And a further fan commented: “Take Care Lovely, See you back next week.”

Just hours before news broke that he wouldn’t be competing this weekend, Nick had shared his hope that he would be able to win enough points from the judges to carry him through to the next week. Interacting with fans on X, one follower messaged the star to write: “Let’s hope you get through over the weekend fingers crossed.” And Nick himself replied with a string of fingers crossed emojis.

Former The One Show presenter Jermaine Jenas has broken his online silence amid speculation about Gary Lineker’s future at the BBC.

The BBC said on Thursday night that it has not yet agreed a contract renewal with Match of the Day host Lineker The corporation denied an announcement was pending regarding its highest-paid star, who it said is under contract until the end of the football season.

Prior to his dismissal from the BBC following an internal investigation into his workplace conduct, Jenas had been one of the favourites to replace Lineker on the Match of the Day couch when the time comes. However, Jenas was let go from his BBC gigs in August following complaints of inappropriate messages to female co-workers.

Lineker has spoken out on the recent scandal involving Jenas, dismissing claims from a story that suggested he had “taken a real interest” amid speculation he might be replaced by Jenas on Match of the Day. Venting on The Rest is Football podcast, the Leicester City icon criticised a newspaper for its front-page narrative.

“There was one last week,” he said. “That was totally ridiculous… a front page story about Jermaine Jenas, who has obviously had his issues of late, the front page story was saying, ‘I’d taken a real interest’ in this story because possibly Jermaine might take my place.” Lineker outrightly dismissed the ‘absurd’ story, stating: “It was so absurd, and I think it’s so absurd that you wouldn’t take it seriously.”

And now, as rumours swirl about Lineker’s future on the show, Jenas has broken his online silence. The dad-of-four, who some think could be set for a BBC return should Lineker quit Match of the Day, took to his Instagram Stories on Friday morning as he enjoyed a wholesome day out at a farm with one of his sons.

“If you rob the bag me and you are going to have a problem,” Jenas tells a goat in one of the clips shared with his 201,000 followers. The goat didn’t listen to Jenas’ warning and proceeded to nab all the feed. “Yo I can see you,” Jenas fumed as the hungry animal pulled the bag from his hands. “These little chiefs. He’s a greedy one. I’m not giving him anymore.”

Jermaine Jenas was a popular figure with BBC Sport bosses ( 
Image:
Getty Images)

Gary Lineker is yet to confirm his future on Match of the Day beyond the 24/25 season ( 
Image:
WireImage)
MailOnline reported earlier this week that it had seen an email purportedly from BBC bosses preparing to announce the 63-year-old Lineker’s departure from the broadcaster after 25 years. The website said it had been unable to verify the authenticity of the email. “We have nothing to announce, and we have not agreed next steps with regard to his contract,” a spokesperson for the BBC said. “He is under contract until the end of the season.” The football season will end after the Champions League final at the end of May next year.

Match Of The Day is one of the BBC’s longest-running shows, having been on air since 1964. Former England footballer Lineker took over the flagship football highlights show in 1999 after predecessor Des Lynam joined ITV. Lineker has been the BBC’s highest paid on-air talent for seven consecutive years and the only star to earn more than £1 million in the year 2023/24 according to the corporation’s annual report published in July.

He was taken off air by the BBC last year having compared the language used to launch a government asylum seeker policy to 1930s Germany. The incident sparked a backlash and resulted in a number of his fellow pundits, including Ian Wright and Alan Shearer, boycotting Match Of The Day over his absence from the show. Lineker later returned to the programme but new BBC social media rules have since banned flagship presenters from making attacks on political parties.

Strictly Come Dancing fans spotted a recognisable face among the audience during the BBC show on Saturday night, with one left wondering if it was “bring your husband to work day”.

Fans of the dance series saw Tess Daly’s husband Vernon Kay, 50, sitting in the first row at Elstree Film and Television Studios in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire, last night. A screenshot shared on X, formerly called Twitter, shows the BBC Radio 2 presenter, dressed in an all-white outfit paired with a light brown jacket, smiling as he looks at his wife Tess.

The Strictly presenter, 55, wore an elegant sparkly blue dress as she introduced the celebrities taking to the dance floor. Sharing an image that shows Vernon among members of the public, a person wrote on X: “Bring ur husband to work day I assume.”

Fans spotted Tess Daly’s husband Vernon Kay in the audience last night ( 
Image:
BBC)
Some people in the comment section said they had also spotted Vernon, with one writing: “Spotted him making faces as she talked.” Another commented: “He’s a proud husband.”

But some complained about Vernon being there, saying this contributes to members of the public not being able to get tickets to watch the show live. A person said: “I’ve never managed to get a ticket from series 1.” One more tweeted: “Glad he managed to get a ticket in the ballot.”

Two weeks ago, after the first Strictly live show, Tess was spotted with her eldest daughter as they headed home in a taxi. Tess, 55, looked in high spirits after receiving support from her daughter Phoebe, 19. The cherished TV star also has another daughter, Amber, born in 2004, whom she shares with her husband Vernon. The mum-of-two looked stunning in the red jumpsuit she wore for the show, while Phoebe looked chic in a white outfit.

On the show last night, Tess and co-presenter Claudia Winkleman addressed Nick Knowles’ sudden exit from the show. Telly favourite Nick, 62, was forced to pull out of the live show on Saturday after sustaining another injury. Nick and professional dancer partner Luba Mushtuk were due to perform the Charleston to Rain On The Roof from the film Paddington 2 for the Movie Week special.

Nick had already suffered a shoulder injury that left him in a sling, just days after the first live show. But it was reported on Friday that the DIY SOS star fell and injured his knee during a dress rehearsal, and is now using crutches to walk. During the live episode on Saturday night hosts Tess and Claudia were quick to speak out about Nick’s absence.

Tess said: “As you can see, Nick Knowles and his partner Luba are not here. In rehearsals yesterday, Nick sustained an injury and is not able to perform tonight.” Claudia then said: “As per rules of the competition, he will receive a bye into next week’s show. Nick we are sending you love and wishing you a speedy recovery.”