Blog

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry remain at the center of royal gossip. Their whirlwind romance and dramatic royal departure have captured glob…

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry remain at the center of royal gossip. Their whirlwind romance and dramatic royal departure have captured global attention. Now, a shocking development has surfaced: Meghan Markle has been left out of the 2025 Invictus Games—a project very close to Prince Harry’s heart.

Scott Moore, the CEO of the Invictus Games, and the board have made the decision that Meghan will not participate in the games to be held in Canada. Instead, they want Prince Harry to attend alone. This raises the question: Is karma finally catching up with Meghan Markle?Meghan Markle first gained recognition through her role on the TV show *Suits*. After marrying Prince Harry, she became a global sensation. What initially appeared to be a modern-day fairytale soon began to unravel, with Meghan’s public image showing significant cracks.

 

Meghan Markle was once seen as a refreshing, modern figure within the royal family, offering a new perspective. However, tensions soon emerged, with media reports suggesting she was creating problems behind the scenes. Accusations of bullying staff and disrupting royal traditions surfaced, and her side of the story was revealed through various interviews, including the infamous Oprah Winfrey interview. Opinions were starkly divided—some viewed her as a victim, while others believed she was manipulating the situation. Despite the growing controversies, her appearances at events like the Invictus Games remained strong—until now.

The Invictus Games, founded by Prince Harry in 2014, support wounded servicemen and women. This cause is dear to Harry’s heart, reflecting his military service and commitment to veterans.

Meghan’s first appearance at the Invictus Games in 2017 was a significant public moment. She quickly became involved, attending events and supporting Harry’s work. Her presence became an integral part of their public lives, but rumors of discord soon surfaced. Some critics questioned her role, suggesting that her involvement overshadowed the games’ purpose. Nevertheless, she remained a key supporter—until now.

The decision to exclude Meghan from the 2025 Invictus Games in Canada followed long-standing tensions. CEO Scott Moore and the board expressed concerns about Meghan’s growing influence over the event.

Reportedly, the issue came to a head during internal discussions about the direction of the 2025 games. Sources close to the Invictus organization revealed that several board members, along with Moore, believed that Meghan’s involvement was beginning to detract from the games’ original mission. They felt that the focus had shifted from honoring veterans to the media spectacle surrounding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. In a bold move, the board made the unprecedented decision to ban Meghan Markle from attending the 2025 games, instructing Prince Harry to attend solo.

This development, which had been kept under wraps until now, has stunned royal watchers and raised serious questions about Meghan’s future public image.

While the Invictus Games Foundation has yet to issue an official statement confirming Meghan’s exclusion, sources suggest the board strategically leaked the information to gauge public reaction. Early reports indicate that Prince Harry has been informed of the decision. Though reportedly upset, he has agreed to attend without his wife. Whether he will publicly address the issue remains to be seen, but this moment could mark a significant turning point in his relationship with both the Invictus Games and the public at large.

As news of Meghan Markle’s ban from the Invictus Games spreads, many are speculating whether this is karma catching up with her. The narrative is clear: after years of controversy, accusations of manipulation, and ongoing feuds with the royal family, Meghan has experienced a significant public setback. But is this truly karma, or simply a business decision by the Invictus board?

Meghan has always been a polarizing figure, with both a dedicated fan base and a vocal group of critics. Her supporters argue that she has been unfairly targeted by the media and public, with others receiving a free pass for similar actions. For them, her exclusion from the Invictus Games is just another example of Meghan being scapegoated for challenging the status quo.

Conversely, critics are celebrating this decision, viewing it as long-overdue justice. Many believe it is proof that Meghan’s influence—both over Prince Harry and in the public sphere—is diminishing. To them, her exclusion from such a prestigious event marks the start of a broader trend distancing Meghan from high-profile platforms.

The concept of karma, or the idea that “what goes around, comes around,” is often invoked when public figures face dramatic downfalls. In Meghan’s case, some see this as karmic justice for her alleged role in creating tensions within the royal family, as well as difficult relationships with staff. However, critics of this viewpoint argue that Meghan has also been a victim—facing racism, misogyny, and a relentless media that seems intent on tearing her down. For them, her exclusion from the Invictus Games isn’t karma—it’s a reflection of sexist and racist double standards that continue to persist in media coverage of high-profile women of color.

As the 2025 Invictus Games draw nearer, all eyes will be on Prince Harry. Will he attend alone, as requested by the board? How will he navigate this delicate situation without straining his relationship with Meghan or damaging his commitment to the games he holds so dear?

For Meghan, her exclusion from the Invictus Games may signal a broader shift in her public role. While some believe this could mark her retreat from public life, others speculate that she will pivot to focus on personal projects and philanthropy. Her next steps will be crucial in shaping her future public image. Will she seize this moment to rebrand herself, or will the fallout from the Invictus Games debacle further diminish her influence?

For Harry, the challenge is twofold. He must balance his loyalty to his wife with his commitment to the Invictus Games. The situation may force him to make difficult decisions about how publicly he supports Meghan. If he attends the games alone, it could signal his willingness to prioritize the event over personal drama. However, if he pushes back against the board’s decision, it could further damage his relationship with the organization, potentially affecting his support for the veterans he is passionate about helping.

The decision to ban Meghan Markle from the 2025 Invictus Games is a defining moment in her and Prince Harry’s public lives. For Meghan, it could represent a turning point in her public perception and involvement in Harry’s projects. For Prince Harry, it’s an opportunity to show where his priorities truly lie, as he navigates the complexities of being both a husband and a public figure. One thing is certain—the story of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry is far from over. Whether this is a karmic moment or a calculated business decision, the consequences will be felt for years to come.

This decision to exclude Meghan from the Invictus Games isn’t just a personal blow—it carries broader implications for the couple’s role in public life, their standing within philanthropic circles, and their ongoing feud with the British royal family.

Some observers wonder whether Meghan’s exclusion is part of a larger strategy aimed at aligning Prince Harry with more traditional institutions, possibly including the royal family. Could this be a step toward softening the rift between Harry and his royal relatives?

Harry’s passion for veterans’ causes aligns closely with the values of other royals, particularly his brother, Prince William. There is no concrete evidence yet that this exclusion is part of a broader plan to bring Harry back into the royal fold, but royal watchers can’t help but speculate.

Another significant implication of Meghan’s exclusion is what it means for the Sussexes’ broader strategy around celebrity and philanthropy. Since stepping back from royal duties, Meghan and Harry have worked to build a brand centered on social justice and humanitarian efforts. However, their sometimes polarizing public appearances have sparked backlash.

Now, with Meghan being excluded from such a high-profile charitable event, it could signal a shift for the couple. If organizations like the Invictus Games begin to distance themselves from Meghan, other philanthropic endeavors may follow suit. This could make it more challenging for her to actively participate in the causes she cares about.

For Harry, the challenge will be maintaining his credibility in the philanthropic world without appearing to completely separate himself from Meghan. It’s a difficult balancing act, given the media-saturated world they inhabit.

No discussion of Meghan Markle’s rise, fall, or potential redemption can ignore the media’s powerful role in shaping the narrative. From the beginning of her relationship with Prince Harry, Meghan has been both praised and vilified by the press.

British tabloids have played a significant role in Meghan and Harry’s story, with constant headlines accusing Meghan of being difficult or manipulative. Now, Meghan’s exclusion from the Invictus Games has been interpreted by some as further confirmation of those claims.

In contrast, American media has often taken a softer tone toward Meghan. Still, as the Sussexes’ star power appears to wane in some circles, even American outlets are beginning to question whether Meghan’s public persona has taken too many hits.The decision to ban Meghan Markle from the 2025 Invictus Games marks a pivotal moment in her public life. Whether it’s a sign of karma or simply a pragmatic decision by the board, the consequences will be far-reaching for both Meghan and Harry.

 

As they navigate the fallout, Meghan and Harry’s next moves will be closely scrutinized. Will Meghan retreat from the public eye, or will she pivot to a new role that redefines her public image? And how will Prince Harry balance his loyalty to Meghan with his commitment to the causes that matter most to him?

In a heartfelt moment that has captivated the nation, Prince Harry and King Charles have reunited for the first time in five years. The emotional encounter unfolded at Windsor Castle, where the two have navigated the complexities of their relationship amid significant public scrutiny and personal challenges.

The estrangement between the prince and his father has been widely documented, with Harry’s decision to step back from royal duties in 2020 and subsequent revelations in interviews and his memoir, “Spare,” further complicating their bond. In recent months, however, the tides seemed to shift. Sources close to the family suggested that both Harry and Charles were eager to mend their fractured relationship, paving the way for this poignant reunion.

As Prince Harry entered the castle grounds, the atmosphere was charged with anticipation. The meeting, initially shrouded in uncertainty, quickly became an emotional affair. According to witnesses, Harry approached his father with humility and remorse. Falling to his knees, he reportedly uttered the words, “I’m sorry, I was wrong,” as he sought his father’s forgiveness.

This display of vulnerability resonated deeply with those present, illustrating the profound love that still exists between the father and son. King Charles, visibly moved, reportedly embraced Harry, a gesture that spoke volumes of their desire to heal old wounds. The moment marked a significant turning point in their relationship, a testament to the enduring ties of family even amidst turmoil.

While the specifics of their conversation remain private, insiders indicate that Harry expressed his desire to move forward, emphasizing his commitment to family and the importance of reconnecting with his roots. The two reportedly discussed their shared memories, recalling the joys and challenges they faced together over the years. This heartfelt exchange served not only as an apology but also as a reaffirmation of their bond as father and son.

The public reaction to this reunion has been overwhelmingly supportive. Many royal watchers have expressed hope that this moment could signal a new chapter for the family, one marked by reconciliation and understanding. The British public has long been invested in the dynamics of the royal family, and this reunion has reignited discussions about the importance of forgiveness and unity, especially in a time of division.

However, the road ahead may still be fraught with challenges. While the initial meeting signifies progress, repairing the rifts caused by years of tension will take time. Both Harry and Charles will need to navigate their feelings carefully, considering the scrutiny that accompanies their every move. The complexities of royal life, combined with Harry’s experiences in America and his desire to carve out a new identity, add layers of difficulty to their reconciliation.

Experts in royal affairs suggest that this encounter could be a pivotal moment for the monarchy as well. With the ongoing changes within the royal family, a united front could serve to strengthen public perception and support. King Charles, who has expressed a desire to modernize the monarchy, may find that embracing the importance of family ties is essential for the institution’s future.

In conclusion, the reunion between Prince Harry and King Charles represents more than just a personal reconciliation; it symbolizes hope for healing within a family that has faced significant trials. As they navigate the complexities of their relationship, many will be watching closely, eager to see how this moment will influence both their lives and the future of the monarchy. The journey ahead may be long, but the first steps have been taken with love and understanding.

Meghan Markle Storms Off After Tim Burton’s Hollywood Walk of Fame Star Diss: ‘You Can’t Sit With Us

In the glamorous world of Hollywood, where drama unfolds both on and off the screen, a recent incident involving Meghan Markle and Tim Burton has taken the tabloids by storm. The mix of royal intrigue and quirky filmmaking has captivated everyone’s attention, making this a story worth following.

The atmosphere is electric as fans gather to celebrate one of the most imaginative directors of our time—Tim Burton. Known for his offbeat style and darkly whimsical storytelling, Burton has captured hearts with films like *Edward Scissorhands*, *The Nightmare Before Christmas*, and *Beetlejuice*.

The crowd is buzzing with excitement as a lavish red carpet is rolled out, leading to the ceremony stage. Celebrities, fans, and press eagerly await the unveiling of Burton’s star. Among the attendees is none other than Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, who has become a symbol of modern royalty and an advocate for various social causes since stepping back from her royal duties.

Meghan arrives in a stunning yet understated outfit, exuding elegance and grace. Her presence adds a touch of royal flair to the event, and cameras flash as she greets fans and fellow celebrities. The crowd is thrilled to see her, and whispers of admiration ripple through the audience.

However, as the ceremony begins, the tone unexpectedly shifts. Tim Burton, known for his quirky humor, takes the stage to share his thoughts on fame, creativity, and his new star. What starts as a heartfelt speech soon veers into unexpected territory.

While reminiscing about his early career, Burton makes a lighthearted jab that leaves the audience stunned. “And speaking of breaking into Hollywood, let’s give a round of applause for Meghan Markle, who knows a thing or two about royal exits. But hey, Meghan, you can’t sit with us!”

The laughter that follows is mixed—some find it hilarious, while others sense the tension in the air. It’s a classic Burton moment, blending humor and eccentricity, but it didn’t land as intended. Meghan’s smile falters, and her body language shifts noticeably as the crowd reacts.

For someone accustomed to navigating the complexities of public life, this was an unexpected twist. Was it just a joke, or did Burton cross a line? Whispers grow louder as people exchange glances, wondering how Meghan will respond.

As the ceremony continues, Meghan appears lost in thought, clearly affected by the comment. She clutches her handbag tighter and glances around, perhaps gauging the reactions of those around her. The laughter dies down, and an uneasy silence settles over the crowd.

Just moments later, Meghan stands up abruptly, sending shockwaves through the audience. She turns on her heel and walks away from the ceremony, cameras clicking frantically to capture her departure. The contrast between her elegant arrival and sudden exit is striking, adding another layer of drama to the event.

As she makes her way through the crowd, murmurs ripple through the audience. Some express disbelief at her sudden departure, while others speculate about the seriousness of the situation. Was this just a momentary lapse in judgment on Burton’s part, or did he unknowingly touch a nerve?

As news of the incident spreads, social media explodes with reactions. Fans of both Meghan and Burton take to platforms like Twitter and Instagram to share their thoughts. Hashtags like #Meghan and #TimBurtonFail trend as opinions fly back and forth. Meghan’s supporters voice their discontent, stating that Burton’s joke was in poor taste and highlighted the ongoing scrutiny she faces. Burton’s defenders argue that it was just a harmless joke, typical of his quirky persona.

The divide is palpable, and the discussion continues to evolve throughout the day. As expected, the media picks up the story, turning it into sensational headlines. News outlets report on the incident, analyzing every detail and quoting sources close to both Meghan and Burton.

Speculation runs rampant. Did Meghan take the joke too seriously? Was Tim unaware of the impact his words might have? Body language experts dissect Meghan’s expressions and gestures during the ceremony, wondering if her reaction was a sign of deeper frustrations or simply a momentary overreaction.

In the days following the incident, both Meghan and Tim find themselves at the center of a media whirlwind. Tim Burton, known for his creativity and dark humor, faces backlash from fans and critics alike. Meanwhile, Meghan’s supporters rally behind her, sharing stories of their own experiences with public scrutiny.

This incident serves as a reminder of the fine line between humor and insensitivity in a world where every word is scrutinized. Celebrities must tread carefully, and Burton’s attempt at humor may have been a misstep, but it also highlights the complexities of public perception and celebrity culture.

As the dust settles, one thing is clear—this incident won’t be forgotten anytime soon. It encapsulates the unpredictable nature of celebrity life and the ever-watchful eyes of the public. While Tim Burton may have intended to entertain, he inadvertently sparked a conversation about the impact of words and the importance of sensitivity in humor.

So what can we learn from this? Perhaps it’s that humor, while a valuable tool for connection, must be wielded with care—especially in a world where public figures are constantly under scrutiny.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, have been at the center of discussions regarding their royal titles. After relocating to the United States, they retained their titles despite stepping down as senior working royals. However, recent events have reignited the debate about whether they should continue to hold these prestigious positions.

When Harry and Meghan decided to distance themselves from the royal family, the Firm made a significant decision: they would no longer be referred to as “His Royal Highness” and “Her Royal Highness.” Instead, they were allowed to continue using the titles of Duke and Duchess of Sussex. This compromise aimed to strike a balance between their independence and their historical roles within the monarchy.

Sources close to the royal family reveal that King Charles and Prince William have engaged in lengthy conversations about potentially stripping the Sussexes of their titles. The first instance of this discussion occurred when Harry and Meghan initially stepped back from their royal duties. However, the king and prince are reportedly hesitant, fearing that such a move could backfire and worsen the situation.

Even without their titles, Harry and Meghan would still be able to continue their work and travel. They would be welcomed with open arms in most places around the world. The challenge lies in finding a solution that doesn’t give the renegade royals additional reasons to complain. Stripping their titles might not prevent them from being associated with the royal family, as the public tends to retain familiar names—much like how Kate Middleton is still widely known as “Kate Middleton.”

Harry and Meghan’s recent trip to Nigeria raised eyebrows. The couple was greeted with dances, receptions, and visits to schools and charities, making it appear like an official royal tour. Prince William was reportedly furious and determined to prevent similar situations in the future.

As the debate continues, the fate of Harry and Meghan’s royal titles remains uncertain. Whether they will be stripped of their prestigious positions or continue to carry them, the world watches closely. Regardless, their impact and influence extend beyond mere titles, and their journey continues even beyond the palace gates.

In his latest book, Catherine, the Princess of Wales: The Biography, royal author Robert Jobson explores the complex dynamics within the British royal family, particularly focusing on the relationships between Prince William, Catherine, Princess of Wales, and Meghan Markle. Jobson’s account has sparked controversy, especially regarding his portrayal of William and Catherine as potentially “petty and jealous” over Meghan’s initial popularity.

According to Jobson, the arrival of Meghan Markle brought a fresh and modern image to the royal family, generating significant public interest and media attention. This newfound attention reportedly led to whispers within the palace of William and Catherine feeling overshadowed. Jobson suggests that the couple may have experienced discomfort and jealousy as Meghan’s star rose, particularly during her early days with the royal family​.

The book recounts several incidents that allegedly illustrate the tensions between the two couples. One notable example involves a minor incident where Meghan reportedly asked to borrow Catherine’s lip gloss, to which Catherine responded reluctantly, even grimacing as she handed it over. Such moments, according to Jobson, contributed to the perceived rift between the royal couples, highlighting underlying frictions that were amplified by the media’s fascination with Meghan​​.

Jobson’s depiction has drawn criticism and skepticism, with some observers questioning the accuracy and motivation behind his claims. Critics argue that Jobson’s narrative might be influenced by a desire to sensationalize royal relationships, potentially for financial gain. The portrayal of William and Catherine as jealous figures contrasts with their public image of being composed and supportive members of the royal family. This discrepancy raises questions about the veracity of Jobson’s sources and the potential for exaggeration to sell books​​.

Moreover, Jobson’s insights come at a time when the royal family continues to navigate a complex public landscape, marked by ongoing scrutiny of their actions and relationships. The book’s revelations, whether accurate or not, underscore the challenges the royals face in maintaining a united front amidst internal and external pressures.

In conclusion, Catherine, the Princess of Wales: The Biography by Robert Jobson presents a controversial and potentially contentious view of the royal family’s dynamics, particularly regarding the alleged jealousy felt by William and Catherine towards Meghan Markle. While these claims have stirred debate and skepticism, they offer a glimpse into the intricacies and challenges of life within the royal institution​.

Prince Harry’s divorce from Meghan Markle has been deeply affected by allegations of infidelity, which were brought to light by Meghan’s mother, Doria Ragland. Doria uncovered evidence of multiple affairs, including a one-night stand, and provided this proof to Harry.

The revelations led to Harry’s devastation and prompted a legal separation between the couple, causing significant damage to Meghan’s reputation.

The situation escalated as it became clear that Harry’s departure from royal duties was not a mutual decision but a reaction to these infidelity claims. Doria’s private investigations revealed shocking evidence that compromised Meghan and Harry’s carefully curated public image. Reports suggest that Meghan was involved in several physical relationships during her marriage, intensifying the questions of trust and loyalty between the couple.

The confrontation between Meghan and Harry, triggered by the infidelity evidence, led to a painful and rapid decision to legally separate. This emotional turmoil was exacerbated by the public scrutiny surrounding their marriage. Meghan, seeking to escape the fallout and start anew, relocated quickly to Los Angeles to stay with her mother.

The scandal surrounding Meghan’s alleged infidelities and the subsequent separation has placed immense strain on both their personal lives and public personas. As Meghan begins her new chapter away from the spotlight, the repercussions of these revelations continue to reverberate through their lives.

In a shocking turn of events, media mogul Oprah Winfrey has reportedly asked Meghan Markle to pay damages for an alleged on-air lie that purportedly ended Winfrey’s career. This development has stirred significant controversy and speculation in both media and public spheres.

The incident traces back to the explosive interview aired in March 2021, where Meghan Markle and Prince Harry sat down with Oprah to discuss their departure from royal duties. The interview was widely watched and generated intense public interest due to its revelations about the royal family and the Sussexes’ experiences.

According to sources, Oprah believes that a specific statement made by Meghan during the interview has caused irreparable harm to her career. The claim centers around Meghan’s allegation that a member of the royal family made racially insensitive remarks about her son, Archie. This assertion led to a media frenzy and substantial backlash against the royal family, but it also allegedly had unintended repercussions for Oprah.

Insiders claim that Oprah has faced significant professional setbacks due to the fallout from the interview. She has reportedly lost major partnerships and faced a decline in her public image and trustworthiness. In light of these consequences, Oprah is said to be holding Meghan accountable for the damages she has incurred.

The demand for damages highlights the intricate dynamics of media, public perception, and personal relationships. While Oprah and Meghan appeared to share a bond of trust during the interview, this development suggests that their relationship may have been strained by the subsequent fallout.

Public reactions to this news have been mixed. Some support Oprah’s stance, arguing that Meghan’s statements carried significant weight and should have been more carefully considered. Others believe that Oprah is overreacting and that the consequences she faces are part and parcel of the media industry.

This situation also raises broader questions about the responsibilities of public figures when making serious allegations on widely viewed platforms. The balance between revealing personal experiences and the potential repercussions of those revelations is a delicate one, particularly when it involves influential individuals like Oprah and Meghan.

As the story unfolds, it remains to be seen how this demand for damages will impact both Oprah’s and Meghan’s careers and public images. The incident underscores the profound effects that high-profile interviews can have, not only on their subjects but also on the interviewers who facilitate them.

In a surprising turn of events, Prince William has officially invited his brother, Prince Harry, to return to the UK, citing an emotional dream about their late mother, Princess Diana. The announcement, which has captured the attention of the media and royal watchers alike, marks a significant moment in the ongoing saga of the royal family’s dynamics.

Prince William revealed that he experienced a vivid dream in which Princess Diana spoke to him, urging him to mend the rift with Harry. “In the dream, my mother appeared so clearly,” he shared in a statement. “She conveyed a powerful message about love, family, and the importance of unity. It was as if she was reminding me that life is too short for unresolved issues.”

This heartfelt revelation comes amid ongoing tensions between the two brothers, which have been exacerbated by Harry’s move to the United States and his candid memoir detailing his struggles with royal life. Many royal observers have speculated about the possibility of reconciliation, but this dream appears to have ignited a new hope for healing.

In the wake of William’s announcement, Harry has expressed gratitude for his brother’s gesture. Sources close to the Duke of Sussex reveal that he has been reflecting deeply on his own relationship with the family and is open to the idea of returning to the UK for a family gathering. “Harry feels a strong connection to his mother, and this invitation feels like a sign,” the source stated.

 

Royal commentators believe this could be a pivotal moment for the royal family. Historian Anna Whitelock noted, “Diana was always the glue that held this family together. If her memory can inspire these two brothers to reconcile, it could have a profound impact on the monarchy moving forward.”

 

The invitation comes at a time when the royal family is navigating its own challenges, including public scrutiny and calls for modernization. By reaching out to Harry, William not only honors their mother’s legacy but also demonstrates a willingness to embrace change within the monarchy.

As preparations begin for a potential family reunion, fans of the royal family are hopeful that this new chapter will bring peace and understanding. In a world where family ties often seem fragile, the dream of Princess Diana serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring power of love and forgiveness.

Stay tuned as we follow this developing story, hopeful that the bond between the brothers will be strengthened in the spirit of their beloved mother.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are going through a major shift – and it’s led to their telling solo appearances, according to a so-called pal.

In recent weeks, Harry has been away from wife Meghan and their two children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet after making a string of public appearances in New York, London, as well as Southern Africa. During his travels, Meghan was barely seen, however, she did attend a star-studded gala in aid of the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles at the weekend, wearing an eye-popping red gown as she posed for photographers.Several years ago, Meghan once described her and Harry as like “salt and pepper” as they always “move together”. And with this seemingly not happening in recent weeks since their tour of Colombia in August, it has led many to wonder why this might be the case.

 

According to a source reportedly close to the couple, the reason for the solo appearance is down to a shift in their ventures. The alleged pal told People magazine: “It’s clear that a twin-track approach is evolving.” While alleged another pal added: “The Duke and Duchess have now hit their stride as individuals – not just as a couple. The Duke appears focused on his patronage work, and the Duchess focused on her entrepreneurial track.”

“An entrepreneurial and enterprise focus is going to be more the Duchess’s priority and the Duke will continue to champion his not-for-profit patronages. But there will be joint efforts around those cause-driven areas of work.”

And with Meghan’s absence in recent weeks, the friend addressed her staying behind the scenes saying it far from signals a split. They added: “[It’s] as much a reflection on parenting priorities, in that one of them stays behind with the children.”

During Meghan’s outing on Saturday night, she wore a recycled eye-catching red Carolina Herrera gown as she turned up for the star-studded night at the LA Children’s Hospital charity gala. Meghan could be seen posing for photographers on the red carpet as well as chatting to pal Kelly McKee Zajfen.

The solo appearance came after Meghan had laid low for several weeks while her husband Prince Harry has been crisscrossing the world in a string of appearances promoting his own charitable endeavours. And it led to some speculation as to why Meghan had attended the event, especially without Harry.

But on her and Harry’s official website Sussex.com, Meghan’s close connection with the hospital was explained – as was the reason for her attending the charity night.

A write-up of the event on the site said: “This weekend, Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex attended the biennial Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) Gala, an inspiring event dedicated to celebrating the exceptional services provided to children across LA. Invited as a special guest by CHLA’s president and CEO, Paul Viviano, The Duchess was proud to stand alongside esteemed guests in support of this vital cause.”It continued: “The Duchess has a long-standing connection with CHLA, having visited the hospital on several occasions to meet with patients and participate in the annual Make March Matter campaign. Her presence at the gala underscored her commitment to advocating for the health and well-being of children around the world.

 

The evening was a resounding success, reminding us all of the power of community support in improving the lives of those in need. We extend our heartfelt gratitude to CHLA and everyone involved for their dedication and generosity. Together, we can continue to make a meaningful difference in the lives of children and their families.”

Priпce Harry risks beiпg removed from liпe of sυccessioп iп royal reveпge plot. Priпce Harry’s positioп as fifth iп liпe to the throпe coυld be iп jeopardy dυe to his permaпeпt resideпce oυtside the UK aпd abseпce of royal dυties.

Accordiпg to a soυrce, discυssioпs at the Royal Family’s sυmmit at Balmoral this sυmmer may пot oпly address Priпce Harry aпd Meghaп Markle’s titles bυt coυld also coпsider removiпg them from the liпe of sυccessioп. “The order of sυccessioп caп be altered by statυte if a member of the Royal Family permaпeпtly resides oυtside the UK aпd пo loпger υпdertakes royal dυties,” said the soυrce.

“If that were to happeп, Harry’s childreп coυld also be removed from the liпe of sυccessioп.” Robert Blackbυrп, a professor of coпstitυtioпal law at Kiпg’s College Loпdoп, tells Express.co.υk that althoυgh liviпg abroad is пot a legal disqυalificatioп for becomiпg moпarch, Priпce Harry caп still be removed from the liпe of sυccessioп by aп Act of Parliameпt. “Like Edward VIII, Priпce Harry does пot wish to perform the role of royalty expected of him aпd has withdrawп to live abroad. Presυmably therefore Priпce Harry woυld be agreeable to abdicate his place iп sυccessioп if for aпy reasoп this became aп issυe iп royal affairs beiпg legislated υpoп,” said Blackbυrп.

“Several Acts of Parliameпt have chaпged the law oп sυccessioп or imposed coпditioпs for becomiпg Moпarch, пotably the Bill of Rights 1689 aпd Act of Settlemeпt 1701. More receпtly Edward VIII volυпtarily abdicated aпd was replaced as Kiпg by his brother George VI by Act of Parliameпt iп 1936.” Blackbυrп adds that for a coпstitυtioпal measυre like this, it is cυstomary for the British Goverпmeпt to take the iпitiative aпd iпtrodυce the Bill – пot the moпarch. “Backbeпch MPs or Peers caп techпically iпtrodυce a Private Members’ Bill oп the sυbject, bυt it woυld get пowhere aпd be blocked by the goverпmeпt from proceediпg fυrther thaп a formal First Readiпg,” said Blackbυrп.

“The oпly possible sceпario, as I see it, is for there to be a Goverпmeпt Bill beiпg prepared oп aпother royal issυe, sυch as aп ameпdmeпt to the Regeпcy Act dealiпg with eligible coυпsellors of state, aпd a claυse beiпg added at the same time which Priпce Harry himself reqυests that removes him from the liпe of sυccessioп as a mark of him clearly wishiпg to reliпqυish all ties to the pυblic work of the Moпarchy aпd Royal Family.” Priпce Harry aпd Meghaп Markle aппoυпced their decisioп to step dowп as seпior workiпg royals iп Jaпυary 2020, statiпg that they plaппed to “work to become fiпaпcially iпdepeпdeпt”.

Accordiпg to a soυrce, oпe poiпt of discυssioп at what has beeп dυbbed a “royal family sυmmit” will be the Dυke aпd Dυchess of Sυssex aпd how they will fit iп with the Royal Family over the пext decade. “Not oпly will Harry aпd Meghaп’s toυrs aпd υpcomiпg trip to Caпada be oп the ageпda, bυt also their titles aпd peerages will be υp for discυssioп,” said the soυrce. The Dυke aпd Dυchess of Sυssex have jυst completed their secoпd qυasi-royal toυr this year – iп Colombia, where they speпt foυr days last week promotiпg meпtal health amoпg yoυпgsters aпd the military commυпity, cyberbυllyiпg, female empowermeпt aпd the cυltυral richпess of Colombia.

Back iп May, the Sυssex coυple also visited Nigeria. Royal commeпtator Emily Aпdrews dυbbed Harry aпd Meghaп’s “toυrs” as “somewhat risky” dυe to them пot haviпg the protectioп or diplomatic expertise of the Foreigп Office as they are пot workiпg royals. The coυple were iпvited to Colombia by Vice Presideпt Fraпcia Márqυez who provided them a fυll secυrity detail dυriпg their visit, the cost of which reportedly hit the coυпtry with a £1.5 millioп bill, accordiпg to local media. As they seпsatioпally qυit their royal dυties iп 2020 aпd moved to the US, the Sυssexes пo loпger travel at the reqυest of the UK Goverпmeпt oп official overseas royal visits.