Prince Harry’s bombshell memoir Spare has been released as a paperback edition, but will you be buying it? Vote now.

POLL: Will you buy the new paperback edition of Prince Harry’s memoir Spare? (Image: Getty and Penguin Random House/ Ramona Rosales)

The paperback edition of Prince Harry’s memoir Spare is now on sale in the UK, threatening to bring up bombshell claims and allegations the Duke of Sussex aimed at the Royal Family.

The 416-page tell-all book was first released in January 2023 and quickly became an international bestseller, with Harry sharing his life story for the first time in such “raw unflinching honesty”.

The memoir, ghost-written by Pulitzer Prize winner J R Moehringer, detailed Harry’s journey from “trauma to healing”.

It takes readers back to Princess Diana’s funeral in 1997 up until his decision to step back from the Firm in 2020, sharing revelations and insight into his career and life in the Royal Family.

Paperback editions commonly include extra chapters or updates but Harry’s publisher Penguin Random House confirmed that the “new edition will have the same cover image as the hardcover edition, a newly designed package and the contents of the book are unchanged”.

If you can’t see the poll above, click here to vote

Spare was originally published on January 10, 2023, and sold more than six million copies in all formats internationally. It also notably became the fastest-selling nonfiction book of all time.

Speaking in the days after its release, Shannon DeVito, director of books at Barnes & Noble, said: “We sold books in every location — and we sold a lot of them.

“Some people came in right before work, some people came in on their lunch break, some people came in after. But the velocity of sales throughout the day was gigantic.”

Harry said before his book was released: “I’m writing this not as the prince I was born but as the man I have become.

“I’ve worn many hats over the years, both literally and figuratively, and my hope is that in telling my story — the highs and lows, the mistakes, the lessons learned — I can help show that no matter where we come from, we have more in common than we think.”

So what about YOU? Will you buy the new paperback edition of Spare? Vote in our poll and join the debate in the comment section below.

What’s unfolding right now with Prince Harry’s visa situation is absolutely mind-blowing, and the implications could be far more serious than anyone initially thought. 

Where exactly is Harry? Why has he suddenly gone quiet, and more importantly, why aren’t we seeing him in the U.S.? I

Oh yes, the Heritage Foundation—God bless them—has been fighting tooth and nail to access Harry’s visa records. Why? Because our favorite truth-challenging prince admitted in his money-grabbing memoir, *Spare*, that he’s used not just cannabis, but also cocaine, magic mushrooms, and ayahuasca. For the average person, these kinds of admissions could be disastrous for immigration status. Just look at what happened to Angela Lawson; she was denied entry to the U.S. for far less.

But here’s where it gets juicy: the Heritage Foundation has just uncovered new court documents indicating that this case is far from over. They are demanding to see private correspondence between the Department of Homeland Security and the judge. Why? Because something smells fishier than a week-old sushi about how this whole situation has been handled.

We are just weeks away from the presidential election, and suddenly Harry has gone completely AWOL. Coincidence? I think not! Remember what Donald Trump said about Harry’s situation? He made it clear that if he wins the presidency, those visa records are going to see the light of day faster than Meghan can say “Netflix deal.”

Speaking of Meghan, isn’t it interesting how she’s been forced to attend events alone lately? Poor Meghan is discovering the hard way that without her royal meal ticket by her side, those A-list invitations are drying up faster than a puddle in the Mojave Desert. She’s probably pacing around their Montecito mansion right now, wondering how to spin this latest disaster into another victim narrative.

But here’s what’s truly fascinating: we could be witnessing a massive diplomatic incident in the making. Think about it—members of the British government are making unprecedented comments about American politics, and it all seems to connect back to Harry’s situation. Why would they risk creating such tensions unless something much bigger is at stake? Let’s not forget that Harry admitted in *Spare* to using drugs while staying at Tyler Perry’s house. That’s not just a confession; it’s an admission of a federal crime on American soil. The arrogance is staggering, but then again, what else would you expect from someone who thinks his royal status puts him above the law?

The court documents are particularly revealing. The judge’s ruling has been redacted to protect Harry’s privacy interests, but since when does a public figure who voluntarily discloses his drug use in a best-selling book deserve such protection? It’s absurd! Angela Lawson and Amy Winehouse—these talented women couldn’t even enter the country because of their past drug use, but Harry gets special treatment? Make it make sense!

And here’s another thing that’s bothering me: the timing of all these old videos and photos being released. You know the ones I’m talking about—the surfing footage that’s clearly not recent and the carefully staged paparazzi shots. It’s classic Sussex smoke and mirrors, trying to distract us from the fact that Harry might actually be stuck outside the U.S. right now.

The implications are enormous, my friends. If Harry is indeed being denied re-entry, it would explain a lot—the sudden silence, the absence from appearances, the desperate attempts to maintain appearances. And if Trump wins the election? Well, let’s just say Harry might want to start looking for a new place to live other than Montecito.

You know what really gets me? The sheer entitlement of it all. Here we have a prince from the UK, someone who’s supposed to understand diplomacy and protocol, potentially causing an international incident because he thought the rules didn’t apply to him. Meanwhile, his brother William and the wonderful Catherine continue to serve their country with dignity and grace, showing exactly what real royalty looks like. The contrast couldn’t be clearer. While William and Catherine focus on their duties, helping people and representing their country with pride, Harry and Meghan have created an endless soap opera of drama. And for what? To stick it to his family and prove some point about independence? How’s that working out for you now?

The Heritage Foundation’s latest court filing is fascinating. They argue that the way this case has been handled doesn’t align with our adversarial system. In plain English, they’re saying this whole situation reeks of special treatment and backroom deals. And you know what? I couldn’t agree more. Think about the precedent this sets: if Harry gets away with admitting drug use on American soil while on a visa, what message does that send? That there’s one rule for royalty and another for everyone else? That’s exactly the kind of system Americans rejected when they fought for independence.

Now, let’s talk about Meghan’s role. Isn’t it interesting how she’s suddenly become so much more visible, doing solo appearances to maintain their public profile? It’s like watching a desperate attempt to keep their brand relevant while Harry deals with potential crises. But without him by her side, she’s finding it hard. The timing couldn’t be more critical with the election looming and Trump openly stating his intentions regarding Harry’s visa records. We might be witnessing the beginning of the end for the Sussexes’ American adventure. And wouldn’t that be something? All their carefully laid plans and attempts to create their own royal court in California could be undone because they thought they were above the law.

The irony is delicious. Harry and Meghan left the UK claiming they wanted privacy and freedom, only to potentially be forced out of their chosen sanctuary because of Harry’s own public admissions. You couldn’t make this up! It’s like watching a Shakespearean play unfold in real-time, complete with a betrayal and potentially a dramatic fall from grace.

What are the broader implications? Charles must be watching this unfold with a mix of concern and frustration. His second son, already a source of endless controversy, might now be at the center of an international diplomatic incident. Meanwhile, the Prince and Princess of Wales continue to demonstrate how modern royalty should behave—with dignity, discretion, and genuine commitment.

Now, let’s be clear about something: this isn’t just about visa applications and drug admissions. It’s about accountability and the rule of law. It’s about whether someone’s royal status should protect them from the consequences of their actions. The Heritage Foundation is doing important work fighting for transparency and equal treatment under the law. The next few weeks will be absolutely crucial. If Trump wins the election, we might see what’s in those visa records. If Harry is indeed currently unable to enter the U.S., the Sussexes will have some very difficult decisions to make.

Meghan might need to get used to attending events alone. For someone who was so quick to trash his family, criticize his country, and lecture Americans about politics, Harry might be about to learn a very hard lesson about humility. And Meghan? This could be her biggest role yet—trying to maintain their celebrity status while her royal meal ticket potentially faces immigration troubles. Remember, justice might be slow, but it eventually comes for everyone. The higher the climb, the harder the fall. The Sussexes might be about to learn this lesson the hard way.

The Met Gala in New York City, one of the biggest celebrity events of the year. However, it appears there was some behind-the-scenes drama involving Meghan Markle. Sources have revealed that Vogue editor-in-chief and Gala chair Anna Wintour had to take a firm stance to prevent Meghan from attempting to crash the event.

 

We all know that the Met Gala’s guest list is notoriously exclusive, and Anna is the one who makes the final decisions about who gets in. Apparently, Meghan was not on the invite list but still wanted to attend to support her friend Serena Williams, one of the celebrity hosts this year.

Typically, celebrities can bring a plus one, but Anna had already approved all attendees and was steadfast about not allowing any additional guests, even for the hosts. Reports indicate that Meghan attempted to leverage her royal title when reaching out to Anna’s team to gain approval, but Anna was unyielding. She has been particularly diligent about keeping the guest list aligned with the year’s theme, which this time was *In America: A Lexicon of Fashion*. The focus was on contributions to fashion and pop culture, not personal connections or titles.

While Meghan has certainly made a splash in the fashion world since marrying Prince Harry, she lacks the extensive career history that Anna expects from attendees. It’s reported that Anna believed allowing Meghan to crash the event would set a precedent for other celebrities to try and use their connections to gain entry. The Met Gala is about maintaining exclusivity and celebrating fashion, not about clout chasing or mingling with other famous faces.

Some sources claim that when Anna informed Meghan she wouldn’t be added to the guest list, there was an argument on Meghan’s end. She reiterated the significance of her royal status and argued that her presence would provide a great promotional opportunity for Vogue, but Anna remained resolute, insisting that Meghan did not meet the theme requirements and that her decision was final. While Anna wasn’t rude, she didn’t waver in her stance.

This latest incident adds to the ongoing tension between Meghan and Anna, which has been complicated since Meghan and Harry’s explosive interview with Oprah. During that interview, Meghan spoke out against the treatment she received from the royals, leading to speculation that Anna was displeased with her for essentially tarnishing the monarchy’s image on a global scale. Although Anna hasn’t openly criticized Meghan’s comments, she has navigated a careful balance in her public support for the royal institution.

Sources suggest that Anna has even refrained from featuring Meghan on any Vogue covers out of respect for the Queen, despite Meghan appearing on multiple magazine covers after the Oprah interview. This has been interpreted as Anna’s subtle disapproval of Meghan’s actions and their impact on the Crown’s reputation.

The recent Met Gala snub is seen by some as Anna acting out of loyalty to the royals, especially following months of negative PR stemming from Meghan’s revelations. It’s important to note, however, that representatives for both Meghan and Anna have denied any drama surrounding the Met Gala guest list, claiming that Anna simply evaluated all attendees based on her high standards for the event.

Despite this, the fact remains that while Harry and several other royal family members have attended the Gala in the past, this was Meghan’s first significant opportunity to join, and her absence was notable, especially considering her ties to Serena. For Meghan, it must be particularly painful to feel blacklisted from what is considered the biggest night in fashion, especially due to lingering associations with the royal scandal she helped bring to light.

Having built a budding career in Hollywood focused on couture brands and philanthropic causes like gender equality, the Met Gala represents a chance for many designers to showcase their work on prominent celebrities, significantly boosting their profiles in the industry. While we may never know the exact conversations that occurred between Meghan and Anna’s teams behind closed doors, it’s clear that Meghan was effectively turned away from one of the most star-studded events of the year, associated with the fashion authority she aims to feature in.

For someone striving to distance herself from palace constraints, it must feel like yet another setback to have that same establishment potentially undermine her efforts in the fashion world through the influence of someone like Anna. If this is true, it also highlights a bold power move by Anna to uphold her protocols, even when faced with pressure from royal connections. She clearly sees herself as above any celebrity’s influence, maintaining strict control over the event to elevate fashion. This situation solidifies her position at the pinnacle of the fashion world, where she has the power to grant or deny Met Gala invitations based on each individual’s contributions to the industry.

Meghan Markle Furious as Mike Tindall Leaks Shocking Video of Her Allegedly Slapping Princess Charlotte in His New Book. 

Imagine stumbling upon a headline so outrageous it reads like the plot of a soap opera. In his new book, *The Good, The Bad, and The Rugby*, Mike Tindall reveals a shocking claim: Meghan Markle allegedly slapped Princess Charlotte. This revelation adds yet another layer to the tumultuous saga surrounding the British royal family, which has witnessed its fair share of controversies. Could this incident complicate Meghan’s already strained relationship with the Windsors? Read on to find out more about this royal drama.

Mike Tindall’s book was anticipated to be humorous and insightful, but it includes a claim about Meghan Markle and Princess Charlotte that has fans and critics alike questioning its validity. Known for his fun-loving demeanor, Tindall’s revelations have taken many by surprise. Whatever the details, it’s reported that Meghan is furious behind closed doors.

Royal family gatherings are typically grand affairs, but the real story often unfolds behind the scenes. Imagine a relaxed family event where unexpected drama ensues. According to whispers, the alleged slap was merely a light tap—some view it as playful or disciplinary. However, for Meghan, even minor actions are scrutinized. Why would Tindall include this incident in his book? Does he know more than he’s letting on? This revelation has sparked speculation that there may be deeper issues within the royal family than previously understood.

Since marrying Prince Harry, Meghan has become a focal point of both admiration and criticism. Tensions have been brewing behind palace walls, and Meghan has openly discussed the pressures of media scrutiny. Could this alleged incident be a symptom of deeper frustrations, or is it merely a story that has been blown out of proportion? The tension escalated after Meghan and Harry stepped back from royal duties and relocated to California, revealing shocking details in their Oprah interview. This makes it easy to see why Meghan might feel betrayed by Tindall’s claim. Is this just another chapter in a long-standing family divide, or is it the last straw?

For royals, loyalty and discretion are paramount. Mike Tindall, married to the Queen’s granddaughter, has typically respected this code. However, by discussing this sensitive moment in his book, did he cross a line? Would Tindall have made such a revelation lightly, considering the potential fallout? The royal family is known for keeping its dirty laundry hidden; why diverge from tradition now? This breach of etiquette has ignited debates on social media, with some defending Tindall’s right to share his perspective while others accuse him of violating family trust. Are in-laws exempt from this rule of loyalty?

The public has long been captivated by royal family dramas. Meghan and Harry boast a loyal fan base that fiercely defends their choices, while a substantial number of people believe Meghan has disrupted the family’s harmony. Social media is buzzing with reactions, with hashtags like #TeamMeghan and #TindallTruth trending across both sides of the Atlantic. Some view Tindall’s allegations as an unjust attack on Meghan, while others think it reveals her volatile nature. The public’s divided opinion only adds to the anticipation surrounding Meghan’s response. Will she address Tindall’s claims directly, or will she rely on her supporters to counter the narrative?

Members of the royal family have always faced scrutiny, but the willingness to expose private moments has increased dramatically in recent years. Meghan and Harry’s Netflix docuseries, along with Tindall’s new book, demonstrate that the royal family is no longer as guarded as before. What implications does this have for the monarchy’s future? Are we witnessing a fundamental shift in how royals navigate conflicts, or is this a fleeting moment that will soon fade? While some argue for the benefits of transparency, others contend that excessive exposure erodes the mystique that makes the monarchy so appealing.

For Meghan, the alleged slap may seem trivial, but its implications are far-reaching. As someone who champions kindness and mental health, this incident could starkly contrast her carefully curated image. It could either serve as a minor setback or a defining moment that she and her PR team must confront. Whether the story is true, exaggerated, or entirely fabricated, public opinion will inevitably weigh in. Is this narrative too explosive to ignore, or will silence be Meghan’s best strategy?

Meghan has historically confronted controversies head-on, yet this particular story involving a child places her in a difficult position. Her next move could be pivotal: should she respond publicly and clarify her side, or allow the story to fade away naturally? With her supporters watching closely and critics circling, whatever choice she makes will likely shape the narrative around her for years to come.

This incident casts a shadow over the royal family’s reputation, raising questions about loyalty and commitment to maintaining a positive image. Mike Tindall’s unexpected role in fueling this drama may have lasting effects on family dynamics. Will this event prompt an internal review of how personal stories are disclosed, or is it just a storm that will eventually pass?

One thing is clear: the public’s fascination with royal drama is insatiable. Stories like this offer a rare glimpse into what was once a secretive institution, revealing the humanity behind the privilege. For Meghan, Tindall, and the rest of the family, this moment serves as yet another test of resilience and public perception. Whether they emerge stronger or more divided remains to be seen, but one certainty is that the world will be watching.

Many opinions abound regarding this controversy. Are you #TeamMeghan, or do you believe Tindall’s story holds weight? The conversation illustrates how even minor actions within the royal family can have profound repercussions. Share your thoughts, and let’s continue discussing the broader implications of this royal saga.

The term “Megxit” represents more than just a buzzword; it signifies a major shift in the royal family. Meghan and Harry’s departure in 2020 marked the beginning of a new era defined by openness and vulnerability. Is this transparency a strategy for remaining relevant, or does it hint at deeper issues? The line between public and private life for royals is becoming increasingly blurred

The royal family has weathered many scandals, from Prince Charles and Princess Diana’s tumultuous marriage to Prince Andrew’s controversies. These stories, once kept under wraps, eventually surfaced, forcing the family to adapt their handling of such situations. In an era of social media, every misstep can become sensationalized news. Will Meghan tackle this issue directly, or will she attempt to change the narrative without addressing it? Her decision could set a new standard for how royals confront controversies.

While legal action seems unlikely, it isn’t out of the realm of possibility. Meghan has previously sued tabloids to protect her family’s image. If Tindall’s claims are accurate, she might consider legal action to address perceived defamation. However, suing an in-law could alienate her from the royal family. Any indication of potential legal action would undoubtedly shock the media and heighten the drama.

Each royal scandal carries significant ramifications for those involved. Will Meghan remain focused on her work, or will she confront the royal family again? For Mike Tindall, this incident could spell trouble in his own circles, revealing how royals truly feel behind the scenes. For the monarchy, these tensions might prompt a reevaluation of their approach to transparency. Will the next generation of royals be more relatable, or will they continue to tread carefully?

Why do we remain captivated by royal family dramas? Perhaps it’s because we see ourselves in their struggles. Despite their titles, royals face family dilemmas just like the rest of us. Following royal stories is akin to watching a grand soap opera; the characters are real, and each twist highlights life’s complexities. Meghan’s journey from Hollywood to royalty exemplifies that life is rarely straightforward.

The conversation surrounding this controversy is ongoing. Do you believe Meghan is being unfairly targeted, or does Tindall’s story have merit? The royal family remains as captivating as ever. Share your thoughts, engage with friends, and stay updated on the latest developments. Remember, they are just a family navigating life’s ups and downs on a grand scale. Let’s keep the discussion alive and see where this drama takes us next.

This shocking revelation raises a significant question: what other secrets lie hidden within the palace? For centuries, the royal family maintained a veil of privacy, but with recent openness, we may witness more of their lives as new generations join the fold. Meghan and Harry’s transparency could herald a trend toward honesty, or perhaps the royal family will revert to keeping things private.

 

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has once again stirred the pot with her latest comments, suggesting that her life is on the same trajectory as the Queen’s. This bold statement has left many people in shock and disbelief, causing a significant stir among royal watchers and the general public alike.

 

 

In her latest interview, Meghan did not hold back, drawing parallels between her experiences and those of Queen Elizabeth II. She spoke about the scrutiny she faces, the challenges of royal life, and her desire to serve and make a positive impact, much like the Queen has done throughout her reign. However, the comparison has not been well received by everyone.

Critics argue that Meghan’s experiences as a royal are vastly different from those of the Queen. Queen Elizabeth II ascended the throne at a young age and has dedicated her life to her role, navigating through decades of change and maintaining a sense of continuity and stability within the monarchy. Meghan, on the other hand, has faced a different set of challenges, particularly in terms of media scrutiny and public perception.

One of the most controversial claims made by Meghan is that she is hated for being a threat to Princess Catherine, the Princess of Wales. This statement has reignited the age-old narrative of a feud between the two royal women. According to Meghan, the media and public’s animosity towards her stems from a perceived rivalry with Catherine. She suggested that the comparisons between them are unfair and have contributed to the negative portrayal of her in the media.

Meghan pointed out that, from the beginning of her relationship with Prince Harry, she felt an underlying tension, partly due to the media’s fascination with pitting her against Catherine. She mentioned that the constant comparisons regarding their fashion choices, charitable endeavors, and public appearances created a competitive narrative that she found difficult to navigate.

Furthermore, Meghan emphasized that her independent spirit and willingness to speak out on issues close to her heart have been misconstrued as rebellious and threatening. She highlighted her advocacy work, particularly in areas of racial equality and women’s rights, and suggested that these efforts have sometimes been overshadowed by the negative press.

In response to Meghan’s claims, royal experts and insiders have offered varied perspectives. Some sympathize with Meghan’s plight, acknowledging the difficulties she has faced as a biracial woman entering an institution steeped in tradition and expectation. They argue that the intense media scrutiny and public pressure have undoubtedly contributed to the challenges she and Harry have encountered.

However, others believe that Meghan’s comparison to the Queen and her suggestion of being a threat to Catherine are exaggerated and self-serving. They argue that while Meghan has faced significant challenges, her approach to dealing with them has sometimes been divisive and confrontational.

The narrative of a feud between Meghan and Catherine has been a recurring theme in the media, often fueled by anonymous sources and speculative reports. Both women have, at various times, attempted to dispel these rumors, emphasizing their mutual respect and support for each other. However, Meghan’s latest comments are likely to reignite the debate and further polarize opinions.

In conclusion, Meghan Markle’s recent remarks have once again placed her at the center of public debate. By drawing parallels between her life and the Queen’s and suggesting that she is hated for being a threat to Princess Catherine, Meghan has sparked a new wave of controversy. As the discussions continue, it remains to be seen how these comments will impact her public image and relationship with the royal family.

Watch the video above for a royal expert on Meghan and Harry’s Christmas dilemma

 

PRINCE Harry and Meghan Markle’s ‘star power’ as a couple is dwindling, according to a PR expert.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have undertaken a number of solo engagements lately, and Mark Borkowski claims Harry is going back to his “Royal Family formula”.

Your info will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Prince Harry attended s a Sentebale reception in Johannesburg, South Africa this monthCredit: Getty

 

A PR expert has claimed Prince Harry is ‘going back to basics with a formula that worked for him in the royal family’Credit: Getty
At the start of this month, solo Prince Harry jetted to Lesotho in Africa in honour of his charity, Sentebale.

This followed a brief visit to the UK to hail a group of “little legends” honoured at an awards ceremony.

During the trip he did not see his father the King, or have any contact with his brother, Prince William.

Harry also recently attended a string of events in New York unaccompanied by his wife, and also did a surprise TV stint and tour of a haunted maze on the Tonight Show with Jimmy Fallon.

Meanwhile, the Duchess of Sussex stunned at the LA Children’s Hospital gala in early October, sporting a red gown she had upcycled from a previous event.

PR guru Mark Borkowski told Best magazine: “There has been a separation [of their work] for a while.

“Harry is ‘going back to basics’ with a formula that worked well for him as a Royal Family member, but there’s also the realisation that the couple’s ‘star power’ wasn’t as successful as they hoped.

“They had to change the narrative.”

Post-royal ventures

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped back from royal duties in 2020, and relocated to California, where they now live with their kids Archie, four, and Lilibet, two.

While they no longer do official royal visits, they have kept busy with a number of ventures, including a £82million Netflix deal and a now-defunct £15million Spotify deal.

MEG MYSELF & I Meghan Markle makes surprise appearance without Harry as couple ‘continue to live separate lives’

The couple underwent a joint tour to Colombia in August and we also pictured together the day before Prince Harry’s birthday at the George Zajfen Tennis Tournament in Los Angeles.

However, Harry celebrated the night of his milestone 40th birthday without Meghan.

The duke went on a hiking trip with pals to celebrate his big day, leaving his wife and their kids at home.

Prince Harry spoke about social media’s impact on children’s mental health at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) on September 24Credit: Getty

 

The PR expert claimed Meghan and Harry’s couple star power is dwindlingCredit: Getty

 

Meghan dazzled on the red carpet at the 2024 Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) Gala this monthCredit: The Mega Agency
Sources close to the couple insist it was Meghan who organised the lads’ trip.

Their separate plans, followed by Harry’s solo trips across the past few weeks, has sparked speculation surrounding their relationship.

However, a Sussex confidante addressed rumours, insisting: “It is normal for couples to not do everything together.”

With the new term at Lambrook School now well underway, royal fans have been lucky to have seen three royal siblings on numerous occasions so far this year.

Despite their mum Princess Kate’s cancer diagnosis, Prince George, 11, Princess Charlotte, 9, and Prince Louis, 6, have still been able to put on a brave face and make plenty of memories this summer.

Although royal events for the family have been few and far between this year, it is safe to say the three children have not failed to put a smile on the faces of royal fans, particularly Prince Louis.

Royal fans have also been given more insight into the life of the royal children than ever before this year, with behind-the-scenes videos showing what family life is really like for the Wales’ children.

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

Princess Charlotte telling Prince Louis off for dancing

Trooping the Colour this year was a big deal for the Royal Family as it marked the Princess of Wales’ first return to the spotlight since her cancer diagnosis. While Prince William was riding on horseback for the celebrations, Princess Kate was kept company by her three children and looked so happy to be back on the royal stage with them.

However, like at most royal events, Prince Louis seemed to be in a cheeky mood much to the amusement of his mum. Princess Charlotte on the other hand was quick to step up and tell the young prince off.

As he watched the parade from a balcony, Prince Louis decided to begin dancing in time to the music, however was quickly stopped by his sister Princess Charlotte, who is well-known for keeping her brothers in check at royal events. The sweet interaction put a smile on Kate’s face as she sat back and took in the parade.

Princess Charlotte was quick to tell her brother off at a royal event this year (Image: Karwai Tang/WireImage) 

Trending

Invalid email

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

Father’s Day photo

Although not a royal event, it is easy to say that the photo released by the Princess of Wales to mark Father’s Day was a special sibling moment this year as the children issued their first statement on the family Instagram.

Along with a photograph of them all hugging their father Prince William and looking out to sea, the royal siblings wrote: “We love you, Papa. Happy Father’s Day.”

The picture, taken on a beach in Norfolk, sent royal fans into a frenzy with many calling the picture “beautiful”.

Prince William with his three children at the beach (Image: Instagram/ The Prince and Princess of Wales) 

An evening watching Taylor Swift

A photograph shared by the Prince and Princess of Wales of the couple’s two eldest children meeting Taylor Swift took the internet by storm.

After performing at Wembley, Taylor took the time to meet up with her old friend William and his children, with the group even snapping a smiley selfie together.

Although Prince Louis was at home with his mother, George and Charlotte were all smiles at meeting the pop star with their dad and royal fans were quick to take to social media in delight after seeing the photograph.

One fan wrote: “Charlotte looks star stuck and fan girling. Omg she’s so a swifie, it’s too cute!!”

Another said: “Best picture ever! What a memory that will be to treasure forever!”

Jumping for joy

Another photo of the three siblings with their dad Prince William was released this year by The Princess of Wales to mark his birthday.

In another photo taken at the family’s happy place in Norfolk, the three siblings and their dad can be seen holding hands and jumping in the air together with big beaming smiles.

The moment, captured by Kate, was liked by over one million people on Instagram and is one of the most casual photographs to ever be released to mark a senior member of the Royal Family’s birthday.

The family appeared all smiles in another new photograph released this year (Image: Kensington Palace) 

Football memories

While Prince George accompanied his father to The UEFA European Football Championship final in Germany this summer, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis watched the game from the comfort of the sofa.

In a cute picture shared by Kate, the siblings sat side by side in personalised England shirts as they watched the game together.

The photograph is one of very few taken from inside the family’s home in Windsor.

Special video appearance

The sixth and perhaps most special sibling moment this year was in the video released on Monday by the Princess of Wales to mark the end of her chemotherapy.

In the video, which was just over three minutes long, the siblings can be seen enjoying plenty of sweet moments together including playing cards, clambering over logs, running around and splashing in the waves. However, the sweetest sibling moment came when the three were messing around on a picnic blanket in front of the camera.

Prince George gets up close to the camera to find out whether it is on, with Prince Louis quickly jumping in to say “hello” to the lens. Princess Charlotte can then be heard giggling in the background before she also sticks her head in front of the camera and smiles. The clip is one of the most natural moments of the royal siblings ever captured and shared with the public.

The siblings featured heavily in the new video released by the Princess of Wales (Image: Will Warr) 

With the children now back at school, it is unlikely we will see as much of the siblings before the annual Christmas Sandringham walkabout later this year.

Princess Kate is also expected to return to royal duties gradually after taking time away from work after her cancer diagnosis earlier this year.

Michael Buerk described the late Liam Payne as a ‘drugged up, faded, boy band singer’

Michael Buerk has faced a backlash after he described the late Liam Payne as a ‘drugged-up, faded, boy band singer’.

The One Direction musician, 31, died after he fell 45ft to his death from a Buenos Aires hotel balcony on October 16.

But Buerk, 78, a former newsreader and Moral Maze presenter, took exception to the BBC’s coverage of the tragic death.

Asked on the Radio 4’s Today programme about how foreign journalism had changed, he said: ‘There was more of an appetite for seriousness. It was only last week this programme decided that the most important thing that had happened in the world was that a drugged up, faded, boy band singer had fallen off a balcony.

‘Even the 10 O’clock News, which is normally good on these things, thought it was the second most important thing that happened in the world.’

The insensitive comments faced criticism from listeners .

Jenny Landreth wrote on X: ‘Blimey. Michael Buerk on #R4today expressing his surprise that the death of a ‘drugged-up fading boyband member’ led the news. He seemed so … disdainful.’

Former One Direction singer Liam Payne was found dead after the 31 year old fell from the balcony of his third-floor room at a hotel in Buenos Aires, Argentina

One Direction’s Harry Styles, Niall Horan, Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik and Liam Payne in 2010

She added: ‘There was no need for him to be so dismissive, it just felt sneery.’

Stand-up comic and novelist Jenny Eclair simply replied: ‘Urgh’.

Another listener wrote: ‘As soon as I heard this on BBC Radio 4 I was sure Michael Buerk would be trending unfavorably.’

One critic of Mr Buerk said that he was ‘stuck in the past’, and compared the journalist to ‘a dinosaur’.

But the former foreign correspondent’s comments were defended by some.

Richard Butterworth wrote on social media: ‘Thanks, Mr Buerk, for putting into perspective on R4 the hyperbole over Liam Payne. While not wishing to speak ill of the dead, or belittle the grief of the deceased’s young followers, the media overkill attending Payne’s misadventure at such a momentous time was ridiculous.’

Mr Buerk, who took part in I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here in 2014, made the controversial remarks on the 40th anniversary of his Ethiopian famine reports.

Asked about the change in television news, he told presenter Amol Rajan: ‘We didn’t have the 24-hour news cycle, which means reporters spend a lot more of their time on rooftops opinionizing rather than finding out what the story is.’

‘I think there was a wider agenda and wider appetite. If you look at the news these days, they seem to be hammering away at the same half dozen stories. While whole continents go unmentioned for months after months.’

The 78-year-old former newsreader and Moral Maze presenter took exception to the BBC ‘s coverage of the tragic death

Droves of fans arrived at the scene in Buenos Aires in the wake of Liam Payne’s death

Shocked fans gather behind a cordon outside the Casa Sur Hotel in Buenos Aires

Payne rose to fame as a member of One Direction, one of the most popular boy bands in history. The group was formed on reality competition series The X Factor in 2010, where Payne, Harry Styles, Niall Horan, Zayn Malik and Louis Tomlinson each auditioned as solo acts before joining the five-piece group.

The singer was pronounced dead on October 16, after emergency services responded to a hotel manager’s call about an ‘aggressive man who could be under the influence of drugs or alcohol.’

The final days of the One Direction star will be explored in a Hulu documentary which will air later today.

The special, titled One Direction: Liam Payne’s Final Days, will feature interviews with former X Factor contestants including Mary Byrne.

Tributes have flooded in for the late singer and vigils have been held across the world in London, Glasgow, Paris, Sydney and New York to celebrate his life.

Earlier this week, Argentine police and prosecutors investigating the tragedy said they were treating the star’s death as ‘inconclusive’.

Preliminary results from toxicology tests of Mr Payne’s remains found traces of cocaine, benzodiazepine, crack cocaine and ‘pink cocaine’ — a combination of methamphetamine, ketamine and MDMA.

While tests on the substances — white powder, traces of chemical crystals and prescription medicines — found at his suite at the boutique hotel continue, results from a post mortem of his body have been completed.

It determined that the singer died instantly from multiple injuries after falling 45ft from the third floor.

Argentine news website Infobae reported: ‘A forensic study carried out in Liam’s body determined the presence of cocaine.

‘A test carried out by the [Buenos Aires] City Police on the substance found on Liam’s room table have not confirmed the white powder as cocaine.

Forensic teams combing the Casa Sur Hotel in Buenos Aires where Payne fell to his death

Tearful fans outside the Buenos Aires hotel console each other and connect on social media

Liam Payne performs at Royal Randwick Racecourse in Sydney on October 13, 2018

Fans place candles outside the the Casa Sur Hotel during a vigil for the star

‘A second test is to follow to determine the nature of the drug.’

Mr Payne’s body will not be released to his father Geoff Payne until all examinations have been concluded, according to Argentine judicial sources.

Mr Payne Snr is expected to stay in Buenos Aires until he can bring back his son’s body in person.

A funeral is expected to take place in Britain in November.

Meanwhile, more than 65,000 people have signed a petition calling for new legislation, known as ‘Liam’s Law,’ to protect the mental health of artists in the music industry following the death of Liam Payne.

The proposed law would mandate regular mental health check-ups, sufficient rest periods and the availability of mental health professionals on set, as well as ongoing support throughout an artist’s career.

One of Liam Payne’s final selfies in Buenos Aires was captioned: ‘Lovely day in Argentina’

Fans of One Direction and Liam Payne grieve together outside the hotel where he fell to his death

Seeking solace in one another, a crowd of devastated fans gathered after the news broke

The petition, launched anonymously on October 18 by a fan named Day KV on Change.org, states: ‘The entertainment industry must be held accountable and take responsibility for the well-being of its artists.

‘Resultant issues such as stress, anxiety, depression, substance misuse and even suicide are alarmingly high.

‘According to research, performers are 2-3 times more likely to suffer from these issues compared to the general population.’

‘Such a law would necessitate regular mental health check-ups, adequate rest periods, and the presence of mental health professionals on-set, including any ongoing support during their career.

‘It will ensure a healthier, safer, and more conducive working environment for artists to cultivate their talents reducing psychological distress.

‘This would also include early interventions to protect and minimise before it’s too late. It adds: ‘Your signature could be a lifeline for these talented individuals, contributing to a larger movement of mental health awareness and care in industries worldwide.

‘Please, sign the petition.’

Michael Buerk described the late Liam Payne as a ‘drugged up, faded, boy band singer’

Michael Buerk has faced a backlash after he described the late Liam Payne as a ‘drugged-up, faded, boy band singer’.

The One Direction musician, 31, died after he fell 45ft to his death from a Buenos Aires hotel balcony on October 16.

But Buerk, 78, a former newsreader and Moral Maze presenter, took exception to the BBC’s coverage of the tragic death.

Asked on the Radio 4’s Today programme about how foreign journalism had changed, he said: ‘There was more of an appetite for seriousness. It was only last week this programme decided that the most important thing that had happened in the world was that a drugged up, faded, boy band singer had fallen off a balcony.

‘Even the 10 O’clock News, which is normally good on these things, thought it was the second most important thing that happened in the world.’

The insensitive comments faced criticism from listeners .

Jenny Landreth wrote on X: ‘Blimey. Michael Buerk on #R4today expressing his surprise that the death of a ‘drugged-up fading boyband member’ led the news. He seemed so … disdainful.’

Former One Direction singer Liam Payne was found dead after the 31 year old fell from the balcony of his third-floor room at a hotel in Buenos Aires, Argentina

One Direction’s Harry Styles, Niall Horan, Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik and Liam Payne in 2010

She added: ‘There was no need for him to be so dismissive, it just felt sneery.’

Stand-up comic and novelist Jenny Eclair simply replied: ‘Urgh’.

Another listener wrote: ‘As soon as I heard this on BBC Radio 4 I was sure Michael Buerk would be trending unfavorably.’

One critic of Mr Buerk said that he was ‘stuck in the past’, and compared the journalist to ‘a dinosaur’.

But the former foreign correspondent’s comments were defended by some.

Richard Butterworth wrote on social media: ‘Thanks, Mr Buerk, for putting into perspective on R4 the hyperbole over Liam Payne. While not wishing to speak ill of the dead, or belittle the grief of the deceased’s young followers, the media overkill attending Payne’s misadventure at such a momentous time was ridiculous.’

Mr Buerk, who took part in I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here in 2014, made the controversial remarks on the 40th anniversary of his Ethiopian famine reports.

Asked about the change in television news, he told presenter Amol Rajan: ‘We didn’t have the 24-hour news cycle, which means reporters spend a lot more of their time on rooftops opinionizing rather than finding out what the story is.’

‘I think there was a wider agenda and wider appetite. If you look at the news these days, they seem to be hammering away at the same half dozen stories. While whole continents go unmentioned for months after months.’

The 78-year-old former newsreader and Moral Maze presenter took exception to the BBC ‘s coverage of the tragic death

Droves of fans arrived at the scene in Buenos Aires in the wake of Liam Payne’s death

Shocked fans gather behind a cordon outside the Casa Sur Hotel in Buenos Aires

Payne rose to fame as a member of One Direction, one of the most popular boy bands in history. The group was formed on reality competition series The X Factor in 2010, where Payne, Harry Styles, Niall Horan, Zayn Malik and Louis Tomlinson each auditioned as solo acts before joining the five-piece group.

The singer was pronounced dead on October 16, after emergency services responded to a hotel manager’s call about an ‘aggressive man who could be under the influence of drugs or alcohol.’

The final days of the One Direction star will be explored in a Hulu documentary which will air later today.

The special, titled One Direction: Liam Payne’s Final Days, will feature interviews with former X Factor contestants including Mary Byrne.

Tributes have flooded in for the late singer and vigils have been held across the world in London, Glasgow, Paris, Sydney and New York to celebrate his life.

Earlier this week, Argentine police and prosecutors investigating the tragedy said they were treating the star’s death as ‘inconclusive’.

Preliminary results from toxicology tests of Mr Payne’s remains found traces of cocaine, benzodiazepine, crack cocaine and ‘pink cocaine’ — a combination of methamphetamine, ketamine and MDMA.

While tests on the substances — white powder, traces of chemical crystals and prescription medicines — found at his suite at the boutique hotel continue, results from a post mortem of his body have been completed.

It determined that the singer died instantly from multiple injuries after falling 45ft from the third floor.

Argentine news website Infobae reported: ‘A forensic study carried out in Liam’s body determined the presence of cocaine.

‘A test carried out by the [Buenos Aires] City Police on the substance found on Liam’s room table have not confirmed the white powder as cocaine.

Forensic teams combing the Casa Sur Hotel in Buenos Aires where Payne fell to his death

Tearful fans outside the Buenos Aires hotel console each other and connect on social media

Liam Payne performs at Royal Randwick Racecourse in Sydney on October 13, 2018

Fans place candles outside the the Casa Sur Hotel during a vigil for the star

‘A second test is to follow to determine the nature of the drug.’

Mr Payne’s body will not be released to his father Geoff Payne until all examinations have been concluded, according to Argentine judicial sources.

Mr Payne Snr is expected to stay in Buenos Aires until he can bring back his son’s body in person.

A funeral is expected to take place in Britain in November.

Meanwhile, more than 65,000 people have signed a petition calling for new legislation, known as ‘Liam’s Law,’ to protect the mental health of artists in the music industry following the death of Liam Payne.

The proposed law would mandate regular mental health check-ups, sufficient rest periods and the availability of mental health professionals on set, as well as ongoing support throughout an artist’s career.

One of Liam Payne’s final selfies in Buenos Aires was captioned: ‘Lovely day in Argentina’

Fans of One Direction and Liam Payne grieve together outside the hotel where he fell to his death

Seeking solace in one another, a crowd of devastated fans gathered after the news broke

The petition, launched anonymously on October 18 by a fan named Day KV on Change.org, states: ‘The entertainment industry must be held accountable and take responsibility for the well-being of its artists.

‘Resultant issues such as stress, anxiety, depression, substance misuse and even suicide are alarmingly high.

‘According to research, performers are 2-3 times more likely to suffer from these issues compared to the general population.’

‘Such a law would necessitate regular mental health check-ups, adequate rest periods, and the presence of mental health professionals on-set, including any ongoing support during their career.

‘It will ensure a healthier, safer, and more conducive working environment for artists to cultivate their talents reducing psychological distress.

‘This would also include early interventions to protect and minimise before it’s too late. It adds: ‘Your signature could be a lifeline for these talented individuals, contributing to a larger movement of mental health awareness and care in industries worldwide.

Princess Diana would have insisted William and Harry set their feud aside to present award in her name, a royal expert has claimed as pair set to appear at memorial event, but not together.

The brothers will make a rare joint appearance at the Diana Legacy Award event at the Science Museum in London tonight, but neither will be in the room at the same time, even virtually.

William is expected to give a speech in person to mark the charity’s 25th anniversary and present awards to 20 recipients. The Prince of Wales will appear at the awards event alone as his wife Kate is still recovering from abdominal surgery.

Harry, who lives in California, will then join a video call with the winners, according to reports. However, his involvement will only take place after his brother has left the ceremony.

But Ingrid Seward, the royal biographer and editor-in-chief of Majesty Magazine says that the pair’s mother – who the evening is in tribute to – would have forced the warring brothers to reunite to celebrate the prize’s winners.

‘And if she failed, I think she would have insisted that they came together however briefly by speaking over the video link in order to celebrate the winners of the prize organised in her name,’ she told the Mirror.

+5

The brothers will make a rare joint appearance at the Diana Legacy Award event at the Science Museum in London tonight, but neither will be in the room at the same time, even virtually

+5

Princess Diana, pictured with Prince William and Prince Harry on holiday in Majorca, Spain on August 10, 1987

+5

Ingrid Seward, the royal biographer and editor-in-chief of Majesty Magazine (pictured) says that the pair’s mother – who the evening is in tribute to – would have forced the warring brothers to reunite to celebrate the prize’s winners

‘She would understand that once again it will be the animosity between the brothers that grabs the media’s attention rather than the celebrated young winners. Some day Wills and Harry are going to have to confront one another. What a perfect opportunity this would have been to speak about their mother secure in the knowledge that they were 5,000 miles apart.’

The brothers’ reluctance to acknowledge each other’s presence at the event lays bare the depth of their feud as before their falling out they often appeared together in person to pose with the award winners.

The Diana Award is a charity set up to reflect the Princess of Wales’ belief that young people have the power to change the world.

Ms Seward added that their refusal to honour this confirms the depth of their continuing rift – but said them reuniting would have taken the focus away from the event.

She continued: ‘It is carefully timed so they don’t have the embarrassment of even having to acknowledge each other. Yet they are both honouring the award and their mother’s continuing legacy.

‘The timing confirms their continued animosity. William has no wish to confront his brother on a video screen. It would take the attention away from the point of the evening. It probably will anyway such is the interest in their continuing rift.’

The charity runs anti-bullying and mentoring programmes and recognises young people’s inspirational work.

Dr Tessy Ojo, chief executive of the Diana Award, told The Times: ‘It’s a privilege to have the support of both the Prince of Wales and the Duke of Sussex — particularly as we mark our 25th anniversary year.’

While a spokesman for the award told The Telegraph that Harry will be a ‘key part’ of the celebration.

+5

Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Prince Harry attend the Diana Award’s at St James’ Palace on May 18, 2017

+5

Earl Spencer, Prince William, Prince Harry and Prince Charles follow the coffin to the funeral of Diana, Princess of Wales

‘He is scheduled to speak with the award recipients, virtually, on the evening of the awards to celebrate their accomplishments,’ he said.

A Kensington Palace spokesman said: ‘The Prince [of Wales] will meet key staff and supporters of the Diana Award, before joining the ceremony where he will hear about the recipients’ work, make a short speech and present Legacy Awards to this year’s winners.’

The legacy award was introduced by The Diana Award in 2017 to celebrate the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, on the 20th anniversary of her death.

For most of their lives, the royal brothers have been close, united by the shared trauma of losing their mother who died aged 36 in a 1997 Paris car crash when William was 15 and Harry was 12.

But since Harry’s 2018 wedding to his wife Meghan Markle, relations between them have soured.

An explosive interview that the couple gave chat show host Oprah Winfrey in March 2021 marked a new low, while anecdotes about their relationship in  Harry’s bombshell memoir, Spare, which was released last year, also saw them grow further apart.