Blog

Loose Women star Coleen Nolan was left red-faced by her son’s surprise on-air message during Tuesday’s show, leaving her co-stars and the audience gasping

Loose Women star Coleen Nolan was left red-faced by her son’s surprise on-air message during Tuesday’s show.

During the latest instalment, the panellists discussed the topic ‘did your parents kiss in front of you?’ to which Coleen, 59, revealed she wasn’t a fan of over-the-top public displays of affections.

However, co-star Ruth Langsford was quick to interject as she received a message from Coleen’s son, Shane Nolan, 35. Ruth said: “Interestingly, I’ve just had a message come in, this is from Shane…”

To which a red-faced Coleen exclaimed: “Oh no!” Ruth continued: “He says tell mum, what are you talking about? You’re constantly kissing Michael and it makes me want to vom!’”

Loose Women star Coleen Nolan was left red-faced by her son’s surprise on-air message during Tuesday’s show ( 
Image:
ITV)

Coleen was left red-faced over the message as the live audience and her co-stars gasped in shock. Coleen said in response: “Oh no I’m not, he’s just winding me up and I’m so gonna kill him when I see him!” Asked if it was true, Coleen declared: “No, no!” with Ruth teasing: “She’s gone red!”

Justifying herself, Coleen said: “No, a kiss on the lips, we won’t stand there snogging the face off each other, it makes me sick!” Adding: “He [her son, Shane] watches Loose Women every day, he needs to get a life!”

Coleen, who divorced second husband Ray Fensome in 2018, met boyfriend Michael Jones in 2021 after joining Tinder. Coleen joined the dating site with the help of fellow Loose Women panellist and friend Brenda Edwards.

Talking to the Mirror, Coleen said: “I was on Tinder with Brenda – she swiped right for me I just said ‘oh he looks nice’ and then he messaged me and it just went from there really. And he didn’t have all that ‘bet you’re a loose woman’ or ‘bet you’re in the mood for dancing’ chat.”

Coleen met boyfriend Michael Jones in 2021 after joining Tinder, he sometimes sits in the audience ( 
Image:
ITV)
She added: “I always said, after my second divorce, I’m never, ever getting married again.. I love marriage and it’s fantastic when it’s working. Brilliant. Nothing better. But when it goes wrong, it’s horrendous… divorce is also like grief. You mourn the end of any relationship.”

But Coleen remains the hopeless romantic and has admitted that she does ponder whether wedding bells might beckon again: “I do sometimes,” she said, “I think it would be lovely.”

Coleen was married to Shane Richie from 1990 to 1999, they share children Jake, 32, and Shane Jr, 35. The star was married to Ray Fensome from 2007 to 2018, they share daughter Ciara, 23.

Eamonn Holmes is reportedly planning to indulge in more lavish holidays alongside his girlfriend Katie Alexander just weeks after they enjoyed a luxury cruise together

Eamonn Holmes has reportedly planned more romantic getaways with his new girlfriend Katie Alexander just weeks after they returned from their luxury cruise.

Eamonn, 64, and Katie, 42, made headlines earlier this month when they were seen heading off to the luxury cruise with Eamonn in his electric wheelchair at Heathrow Airport alongside Katie. From there they jetted to Barcelona to board Virgin Voyager’s luxurious Scarlet Lady.

Now reports suggest that Eamonn has made no secret of his plans to jet set more with Katie having allegedly told many of his GB News colleagues about their plans. One said: “Eamonn’s lined up lots more cruises with Katie for the near future. It’s become something they’re both really looking forward to.”

 

 

 

Eamonn and Ruth’s split shocked everyone (The insider added that the pair are also reportedly toying with the idea of packing up and moving out of London to relocate to Eamonn’s native Belfast. Katie is reportedly also certain that Eamonn is her ‘soulmate’ and she’s ready ‘to love and care for him’ given his chronic health woes. “Eamonn is her man, and she’s there to look after him,” the source added.

Meanwhile, Loose Women star Ruth, also 64, has reportedly been left stunned by Eamonn’s new love interest. Earlier this month, a source said: “She’s just trying to get on with life and be around good friends, she’s partying through the pain and is trying to get through it. Ruth is distracting herself and doing things that make her happy keeping busy and being around friends, family and work is the only way she can get through it.”

Image:
Dave J Hogan/Getty Images)

Eamonn is now enjoying life with Katie ( 
Image:
@eamonnholmes/instagram)
They continued to The Sun: “Katie absolutely loves cruises and Eamonn used to say that Ruth was never one for travel. She didn’t enjoy going away and never liked going on a boat or a plane. It became a bit of a sticking point between them as Eamonn has always had a passion for exploring new places.

“Now, with Katie, Eamonn feels he can really embrace that side of life again. He’s eager to make up for the years he felt he missed out on.” GB News presenter Eamonn appears to be fully investing in his blossoming relationship, as he and his partner Katie are also believed to be set to move in together.

And it seems that he and marriage counsellor Katie are completely comfortable around one another, as Katie’s nickname for Eamonn has been unveiled as she continues to be ‘completely smitten’. “Katie is telling everyone that she’s totally smitten and in love. They’ve known each other for nine years, so this isn’t a fly-by-night relationship – she’s in it for the long haul. They’re now looking at places to move in together, as they want a lot more space,” a source told Heat magazine.

 

Loose Women returned for another daytime show with Coleen Nolan and Denise Welch alongside Christine Lampard and Linda Robson

Loose Women fans were left speculating Coleen Nolan and Denise Welch may have had an off-air dispute after the pair came to blows during an awkward episode of the ITV daytime show.

During Tuesday’s episode of the ITV lunchtime programme, Coleen and Denise were joined by Christine Lampard and Linda Robson as they discussed various topics including menopause and friendships.

Christine was keen to get their thoughts on a claim that women only need one good friend in their life, prompting Denise to mention her attempts to organise a get together for the Loose Women panellists.

However, Coleen told Denise she didn’t want to come on the Loose Women meet-up, while Linda said the former singer wasn’t even in their WhatsApp group.

The awkward exchange prompted viewers to take to Twitter to insist there was a “bad atmosphere” in the studio, as one tweeted: “There seems to be a bad atmosphere on the panel today, give me a knife to cut it lol.”

“Something definitely happened backstage, you could cut the tension with a knife.” ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
Another wrote: “Something definitely happened backstage, you could cut the tension with a knife.”

They added, alongside a picture of two women not speaking to one another as they scrolled through their phones: “I bet it’s like this in the ad breaks.”

A third wrote: “You can tell Coleen is very annoyed by Denise today,” as another echoed: “The tension between Coleen and Denise is so obvious.”

Denise, 64, said: “We’ve said that we’re longing to get together and talk about stuff that we never talk about here, but let’s put a pencil on it because you make more of an effort if you’ve got it in the diary somewhere.”

Denise Welch did not hold back as she appeared on Tuesday’s edition of Loose Women ( 
Image:
ITV)
Coleen, 57, then replied, looking away: “But then I’d forget the diary, so…”

Christine, 43, joked: “You’d forget the diary, forget the invite?” Coleen said back: “Yeah. I don’t want to sit and chat.”

Denise replied: “She’ll just get a rubber and rub it out,” before Coleen said: “I don’t want to chat to you, I chat to you here.”

Denise then told her: “Well you’re not even invited, so…” Coleen said in reply: “I don’t want to come. I don’t want to come. I’m busy.”

There have been repeated rumours circulating this year of an ongoing feud between certain Loose Women co-stars, but they have been constantly denied by the panellists.

Wednesday’s episode of Loose Women saw panellist Kaye Adams tell Jane Moore to ‘shut up’ as they discussed whether or not they go to bed on an argument

Kaye Adams was quick to tell Jane Moore to “shut up” on Wednesday’s Loose Women as the panel discussed going to bed on an argument.

Kaye and Jane were joined by Judi Love and Gloria Hunniford on the ITV lunchtime show as they revealed whether or not they bicker with the men in their lives.

Speaking about her own relationship, Kaye admitted: “Ian and I will go to bed having had some kind of spat with each other and we’re kinda frosty and a bit of sort of huffy…”

Jane then butted in: “That’s gotta be you though coz Ian’s so mild mannered, so even tempered…”

Kaye Adams was quick to tell Jane Moore to ‘shut up’ on Wednesday’s Loose Women ( 
Image:
ITV)

“Yeah Ian’s lovely…” Kaye, 59, replied rolling her eyes but as she tried to explain herself, Jane spoke over her and said: “Lovely Ian” but Kaye fired back and jokingly told her to “shut up”.

Mother-of-two Kaye then continued: “Ian is much better at saying sorry than I am, he really is, he could teach me a thing or two.

“But I think we need to go to sleep, wake up in the morning and we’re fine. But we just need that little bit of buffer, probably because I do find it difficult and I think he kinda just lets me be.”

Jane Moore was heard sticking up for Kaye’s partner Ian Campbell ( 
Image:
ITV)
Jane then joked about her husband and said: “Me and Gary, we’ve never had a cross word!” before telling Judi: “You don’t actually believe that do you?!”

The banter between Kaye and Jane comes after Coleen Nolan and Denise Welch butted heads on Tuesday’s edition of the show.

It all started when Christine Lampard was keen to get their thoughts on a claim that women only need one good friend in their life, and Denise quickly admitted that she was trying to organise a social catch up for all the Loose Women ladies.

Denise Welch clashed with Coleen Nolan on Tuesday’s Loose Women ( 
Image:
ITV)“We’ve said that we’re longing to get together and talk about stuff that we never talk about here, but let’s put a pencil on it because you make more of an effort if you’ve got it in the diary somewhere…” Denise said.

Coleen then butted in and said: “But then I just cancel! I don’t wanna sit and chat to you, I chat to you here!” as Denise fired back bluntly: “Well you’re not even invited so…”

“I don’t wanna come!” Coleen blurted out as Linda revealed: “You’re not on our group WhatsApp!”

Loose Women presenter Kaye Adams has undergone a series of tests ahead of her appearance on Strictly Come Dancing, with doctors discovering she is nearly deaf in one ear

Kaye Adams has revealed doctors have told her to seek help as they found she is nearly deaf in one ear.

The Loose Women star, 59, has recently undergone a series of tests ahead of her appearance on the hit BBC show Strictly Come Dancing. She said she has been advised to get hearing aids.

Kaye said the checks found one of her ears has a poor level of hearing, while the other is trying to compensate.

“My hearing is an issue, to the extent that I’ve had full consultations and examinations on my ears. It’s probably getting to the stage where it’s getting problematic in certain situations,” she told The Sun.

Kaye has undergone a series of health tests ( 
Image:
PA)

She added: “I have been recommended to get hearing aids. One ear in particular has a very poor level of hearing and the other one is trying it’s best to compensate.”

Kaye has previously said she has been “struggling” with her hearing for around five years. The panellist opened up about the “scary” times during an episode of Loose Women last month.

Speaking on the ITV show, she said: “For around five-ish years, maybe more, I have been aware that I’ve been struggling but you just make excuses.”

She said she has been suffering for five years ( 
Image:
Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock)
Kaye said she had joked about her hearing lost in the past, but eventually realised it was starting to become more serious.

She said: “Although you laugh that off, it is now beginning to get to me because, I think, I’m really missing things and I don’t want to be a standing joke.”

The show then featured a segment which showed Kaye visiting a doctor to have her ears tested before being told she is losing her hearing in both ears. The doctor advised her to wear a hearing aid in each moving forward.

Kaye then opened up about the experience on her Instagram Stories.

Viewers were taken along for the appointment ( 
Image:
ITV)She wrote: “Never thought I’d say I enjoyed an ear test but @ferazashraf made it easy and painless. Have to admit though his diagnosis was a shock.”

Kaye was announced as the fourth celebrity to be taking part in Strictly Come Dancing 2022.

She will follow in the footsteps of her co-stars, including Ruth Langsford, Sunetra Sarker, Frankie Bridge, Christine Lampard, Gloria Hunniford, Judi Love, Penny Lancaster and Katie Piper.

Kaye said: “I wanted to make the last year of my fifties memorable and I can’t think of a better way of doing it than showing the world my two left feet. Pray for me!”

Prince Harry is determined to carry on Diana’s legacy, after speaking at two events in New York that were close to his late mother’s heart – and we want to hear your thoughts

The Duke of Sussex has said that carrying on Diana’s legacy is a responsibility that he takes “incredibly seriously” as he spoke at an anti-landmine event in New York yesterday – and we want to know what YOU think.

As part of Harry’s eight-day visit to New York and London, he spoke passionately at the event hosted by the Halo Trust – a landmine clearance charity supported by his late mother. The charity gained attention in 1997 after Diana memorably walked through an active minefield in Angola as she called for an international ban.

Now, the charity claims that “countless thousands of lives” have been saved since the ban came into force following Diana’s visit. Speaking about his mother, Harry said: “Carrying on her legacy is a responsibility that I take incredibly seriously.

“And I think we all know how much she would want us to finish this particular job. We are all here because we are a band of true believers, fighting for a mine free world.”

The prince had previously said in a podcast with Gareth Thomas: “I think once you get to meet people and you see the suffering around the world, you can’t turn, I certainly can’t turn, my back on that. Then add in the fact that my mum’s work was unfinished, I feel obligated to try and continue that as much as possible.”

He added that he could “never fill her shoes” because of “what she did and what she stood for and how vocal she was about this issue.” Five years ago, the prince called for action to clear Angola of landmines, urging leaders not to leave the work “half done”.

Harry also attended the Concordia Summit yesteday, where he spoke about the Diana Award, which was founded 25-years ago. It was launched in recognition of Diana’s belief that young people have the “power to change their community, their country and the world.”

He was joined two former Diana Award winners Christina Williams and Chiara Riyanti Hutapea Zhang, where they talked about the mental health crisis facing young people. The Duke, who wore a gold, square Diana Award badge, said: “I know that my mum would be incredibly proud of you guys, not just you, but all of the winners, and, Tessy – you’ve been in this for a very long time so thank you for that as well.

“But the way that you do it, your activism, your compassion, those two things are so true to how my mom led her life and what she believed in. And the way that you do it is incredible. So thank you.”

As part of his tour of the Big Apple, Harry is set to attend several major events to discuss important causes, many of which are associated with Diana. We want to know if you think Harry is doing a good job of continuing Diana’s legacy. Vote in our poll HERE to have your say.

The Mirror will also be discussing the topic with you in the comments section below and you can join in! All you have to do is sign up, submit your comment, register your details and then you can take part.

Ulrike Grunewald’s upcoming documentary has ignited speculation surrounding Meghan Markle, alleging that she has a secret daughter.

Set to air in December, this claim raises significant questions about her past and its implications for her relationship with the royal family, as well as the validity of her previous pregnancy narratives. Public opinion remains sharply divided, with some viewing the documentary as mere clickbait.

Produced by the German journalist, the documentary promises to reveal shocking information about Meghan’s early motherhood.

It has already generated considerable online debate, particularly regarding the rumored existence of a daughter named En Ross Musen, reportedly born in 1997.

This theory coincides with Meghan’s age during that period, intensifying interest in the implications of such a revelation. If true, it could further strain her relationship with the British royal family, prompting questions about Prince Harry’s loyalty and how this information might affect their family dynamics.

The documentary also explores Meghan Markle’s ambitions and potential political aspirations, while delving into the controversies surrounding her childbirth experiences.

Critics have noted inconsistencies in her public narratives, particularly a widely discussed story about ordering takeout during labor, which has contributed to skepticism regarding her accounts. This scrutiny highlights broader issues related to her public image.

As public opinion about Meghan and Harry remains polarized, the documentary’s claims about a secret child add a complex layer to their already complicated narrative.

This twist is likely to escalate the existing drama surrounding the couple, further complicating their standing in the public eye as the release date approaches.

Gather ’round, royal enthusiasts!

The latest chapter in the ongoing saga of the British monarchy is about to unfold, and it promises to be a doozy.

Today, we’re diving into the latest drama that has everyone buzzing—yes, it’s Prince Harry, or as some might say, the Duke of Drama, who is stirring the pot once again.

Just when you thought the royal tea couldn’t get any hotter, Harry has cranked up the intensity to nuclear levels.

Trust me, it’s hotter than the crown jewels on a summer day!

Hold onto your hats, because the paperback version of Harry’s explosive memoir, “Spare,” is set to hit the shelves on October 22nd.

And get this—it conveniently coincides with King Charles and Queen Camilla’s official tour of Australia and Samoa.

Coincidence?

I think not!

This timing feels more calculated than a Swiss watch factory, and it’s raising eyebrows across the globe.

King Charles is scheduled to attend the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Samoa from October 21st to 26th, a significant event that gathers world leaders for crucial discussions.

Yet, right in the midst of this royal duty, Harry has chosen to drop his paperback bombshell.

It’s almost as if he’s got a calendar marked with days to disrupt his father’s plans—first the release of “Spare” right after Kate’s birthday, and now this.

One can’t help but wonder if Harry is suffering from a severe case of “look at me” syndrome.

Rumors have been swirling that this new edition would include tantalizing new content—perhaps an extra chapter or a juicy epilogue.

But after some thorough sleuthing (yes, I read both versions of the book), it turns out that much of the buzz was just smoke and mirrors.

The much-talked-about epilogue is already part of the hardcover and Kindle editions.

Talk about a letdown for those eagerly anticipating fresh revelations!

So what’s really behind this latest move?

Let’s put on our detective hats.

It appears that Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Damage Control, is pulling the strings yet again.

Who benefits from keeping the royal drama alive?

Clearly, it’s not Harry, who seems to have burned so many bridges he might as well change his title to the Duke of Ashes.

This whole situation reeks of Meghan’s master plan, and she’s playing the long game like a seasoned chess grandmaster.

While Meghan strategizes, Harry seems caught up in a whirlwind, desperately trying to speak his truth without realizing he’s lost sight of the bigger picture—the family dynamics that are unraveling before our eyes.

And let’s not forget Prince William, who must be grappling with the discomfort of seeing his brother air their family’s dirty laundry for public consumption.

If I were in William’s shoes, I’d be ready to put my foot down hard enough to leave a mark on Buckingham Palace.

And what about Kate?

The woman is facing her own battles, including health struggles, and now she has to contend with the fallout from Harry’s revelations.

It’s like adding insult to injury, kicking someone while they’re already down.

The last thing she needs is to worry about what new secrets might emerge from Harry’s camp.

Meanwhile, while the Sussexes engage in their publicity stunts, the rest of the royal family is busy fulfilling their royal duties.

King Charles and Camilla are preparing for a significant diplomatic tour, and William and Kate are balancing their responsibilities amidst personal challenges.

What are Harry and Meghan doing?

Rehashing old drama for a quick profit.

It’s almost tragic to witness someone who once seemed so dedicated to his mother’s legacy reduced to a gossip columnist spilling family secrets for clicks.

But hey, who am I to judge?

If Harry wants to keep severing ties with his family, that’s his choice.

And if Meghan continues orchestrating this spectacle, well, that’s between them and their therapist.

As long as they keep serving up this piping hot royal tea, we’ll be here to sip it up.

Because let’s face it: despite shaking our heads at their antics, we’re all still watching, aren’t we?

So what’s next in this royal soap opera?

Will Harry finally extend an olive branch to his family?

Could Meghan be secretly working on her own tell-all memoir?

Or will William finally reach his breaking point?

Your guess is as good as mine.

But one thing is clear: as long as Meghan is calling the shots and Harry is dancing to her tune, we’re in for a wild ride.

So grab your popcorn and settle in for what promises to be the next episode of “The Real Housewives of Windsor Castle.”

What do you think about this unfolding royal drama?

It’s a lot to unpack, and I’d love to hear your thoughts on it.

Let’s keep the conversation going!

Jessica Mulroney she’s Meghan’s former BFF, a Canadian fashion stylist, and apparently the keeper of all Meghan’s dirty secrets. And boy, has she decided to spill the beans.

According to Mulroney, she and Meghan were running a scheme that would make the characters from “Hustle” look like amateurs. We’re talking about exploiting royal connections to score freebies, billing King Charles for bogus expenses, and then selling off the swag for cold, hard cash. It’s like “Ocean’s Eleven” meets “The Crown,” and I am here for it.

Now, let’s break this down, shall we? First, we have the freebie fiasco. Apparently, Meghan and Jessica were using the royal name to get their hands on luxury goods faster than you can say “God Save the Queen.” We’re talking designer clothes, fancy skincare, probably even gold-plated teapots for all we know. They were treating these high-end brands like their personal Costco, and the currency was royal clout.

But here’s where it gets juicy. They weren’t just hoarding these freebies like some kind of post-dragon’s treasure. No, that would be too simple for our dynamic duo. Instead, they were allegedly turning around and selling these items for profit. That’s right, folks—the Duchess of Sussex, fifth in line to the throne, was essentially running a royal yard sale. Can you imagine? Gently used tiara, only worn once to disappoint the queen. Asking price: your firstborn child and a small kingdom.

But wait, there’s more. As if scamming luxury goods wasn’t enough, they were apparently double-dipping by billing good old King Charles for various expenses. It’s like she took one look at the royal coffers and thought, “You know what this needs? A touch of Hollywood accounting.”

Now, I can already hear some of you out there defending Meghan. You’re saying, “Maybe she was trying to save the taxpayers some money. Maybe she was redistributing wealth.” To which I say, if that’s wealth distribution, then I’m the king of England. No, what we’re looking at here, if these allegations are true, is a level of grift that would make the most seasoned con artists tip their hat in absolute respect.

Let’s not forget, this is coming from Jessica Mulroney—the same Jessica who was once Meghan’s ride-or-die, her Canadian concierge, the woman who was there for all the big moments. So why is she spilling the tea now? Is this a case of revenge served ice-cold, or is Jessica trying to get ahead of a story that was bound to come out anyway?

I can jst imagine the conversation:

Harry: “Darling, that’s a lovely new handbag. Is it new?”

Meghan: “Oh, this old thing? I’ve had it for ages. Now, can you sign the expense report for your dad? It’s for royal stuff.”

Jokes aside, if there’s any truth to these allegations, it could have serious consequences. We’re not just talking about a slap on the wrist or a strongly worded letter. This is the kind of scandal that could lead to investigations and legal action. It’s like finding out your favorite influencer’s authentic posts are all paid promotions.

In a historic and unexpected development, Princess Anne, the esteemed Princess Royal, has decided to pass her prestigious title to her young niece, Princess Charlotte. This unprecedented decision has sent ripples through the British royal family and captivated the public, marking a significant moment in the monarchy’s history.

The title of Princess Royal is one of the most esteemed honors within the British royal family, traditionally bestowed upon the eldest daughter of the reigning monarch. It has a rich history dating back to the 17th century when it was first granted to Princess Mary, the daughter of King Charles I. Over the centuries, only a handful of royal women have had the privilege of holding this title, including Princess Anne’s mother, Queen Elizabeth II, and her grandmother, Queen Mary.

Princess Anne’s decision to relinquish this title and pass it to Princess Charlotte is both surprising and strategic. It signals a conscious effort to ensure the continuity and relevance of the monarchy by involving the younger generation in its traditions and responsibilities. In her announcement, made during a rare public address, Princess Anne expressed her confidence in Princess Charlotte’s ability to uphold the legacy of the Princess Royal title. She stated, “It is with great pride and a deep sense of responsibility that I pass the mantle of Princess Royal to my niece, Princess Charlotte. I have no doubt that she will carry on the legacy of this esteemed role with the same passion and commitment that has been the hallmark of my own tenure.”

The news has been met with a mix of excitement and speculation. Royal commentators have noted that this move could be seen as a way to smooth the path for Princess Charlotte’s future role within the monarchy. As the eldest daughter of Prince William and Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, Princess Charlotte is expected to play a crucial part in the future of the royal family. By granting her the title of Princess Royal at a young age, the monarchy is not only recognizing her potential but also preparing her for the significant responsibilities that lie ahead.

This transition, however, is not without its challenges. As a young member of the so-called “Fab Four,” which includes her parents and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Princess Charlotte will need to navigate the complex dynamics of royal life. The expectations placed upon her will be immense, and she will be under constant scrutiny from both the media and the public.

Moreover, Princess Anne’s decision has sparked broader discussions about the role of women in the British monarchy and the need for greater representation and diversity within the institution. Many have praised the move as a step in the right direction, highlighting the importance of female leadership in the royal family. Others, however, have raised questions about whether this change is enough to address the longstanding inequalities within the monarchy.

Despite the debates, there is no denying the significance of this moment. Princess Charlotte’s assumption of the Princess Royal title marks a new chapter in the history of the British royal family. It is a testament to the enduring legacy of the monarchy and its ability to adapt to the changing times. As Princess Charlotte steps into this role, she carries with her the hopes and expectations of a nation eager to see what the future holds.

In the end, the passing of the Princess Royal title from Princess Anne to Princess Charlotte is more than just a personal triumph; it is a symbol of the monarchy’s commitment to its values of duty, service, and dedication to the well-being of the nation. As Princess Charlotte begins this new chapter, she does so with the full support and admiration of the British public, ready to inspire a new generation of young women to dream big and strive for greatness