Blog

In a shocking revelation that has captivated the public and reignited discussions surrounding the tragic death of Princess Diana, Prince William has announced that he has successfully restored the final night vision camera footage from the night of his mother’s fatal car accident. This groundbreaking discovery has reportedly led him to uncover the identity of the individual believed to have sabotaged Diana’s vehicle, stirring deep emotions within the royal family and the public alike.

The footage, which had long been considered lost, was meticulously restored by a team of experts working alongside William. The prince had been determined to seek justice for his mother and understand the circumstances surrounding that fateful night in Paris. His findings have led him to a shocking conclusion: the person responsible for damaging Diana’s car was someone with connections to powerful figures who had long sought to undermine her influence and popularity.

In a shocking revelation that has captivated the public and reignited discussions surrounding the tragic death of Princess Diana, Prince William has announced that he has successfully restored the final night vision camera footage from the night of his mother’s fatal car accident. This groundbreaking discovery has reportedly led him to uncover the identity of the individual believed to have sabotaged Diana’s vehicle, stirring deep emotions within the royal family and the public alike.

The footage, which had long been considered lost, was meticulously restored by a team of experts working alongside William. The prince had been determined to seek justice for his mother and understand the circumstances surrounding that fateful night in Paris. His findings have led him to a shocking conclusion: the person responsible for damaging Diana’s car was someone with connections to powerful figures who had long sought to undermine her influence and popularity.

The investigation has unearthed various pieces of evidence that suggest a larger conspiracy at play, involving not just the immediate circumstances of the crash but also the media’s relentless pursuit of Diana. William has vowed to continue his efforts to seek justice for his mother, promising to bring the truth to light and ensure that those responsible are held accountable for their actions.

This recent development has garnered widespread attention and support from the public, many of whom have long believed that there were external forces at work in the lead-up to Diana’s death. The new evidence has sparked renewed calls for an official inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the crash, with many fans of Diana rallying behind William’s quest for justice.

As Prince William delves deeper into the investigation, he remains committed to honoring his mother’s legacy. Diana was known for her compassion, charity work, and dedication to various causes, and her untimely passing left a void in the royal family and in the hearts of millions around the world. By uncovering the truth, William hopes not only to seek justice for Diana but also to shed light on the systemic issues that continue to plague the royal family and the media’s treatment of its members.

The emotional toll of this journey has been significant for William, who has expressed a desire to protect his family and ensure that the mistakes of the past are not repeated. As he navigates this challenging path, he draws strength from the memory of his mother and the support of his family, particularly his brother, Prince Harry, who has also been vocal about seeking the truth regarding Diana’s legacy

As this story unfolds, the world watches closely, hopeful that the uncovering of this long-hidden truth will bring closure to a painful chapter in royal history and honor the memory of Princess Diana. William’s relentless pursuit of justice not only highlights his dedication to his mother but also serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability, both within the royal family and beyond.

In a shocking revelation that has sent ripples through the British royal family and captivated public attention, Princess Anne has made explosive claims implicating Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, in the circumstances surrounding the tragic passing of Princess Diana. This unprecedented announcement comes three decades after Diana’s untimely death, stirring emotions and reigniting longstanding controversies.

In a candid interview, Princess Anne, the only sister of the late Diana, spoke openly about the complicated relationships within the royal family, particularly between Diana and Camilla. “For years, we’ve been silent, but it’s time for the truth to be told,” Anne declared. “Diana was not only a beloved figure but a victim of a toxic environment that many of us tried to ignore.”

Princess Anne’s comments shed new light on the dynamics that existed during Diana’s life, suggesting that Camilla’s presence played a significant role in the emotional turmoil experienced by the Princess of Wales. “Camilla’s actions, both during and after Diana’s marriage to Charles, contributed to a narrative that ultimately hurt Diana deeply,” Anne asserted, alluding to the public’s perception of the love triangle that ensnared the royal family.

Anne’s revelations come at a time when public interest in the royal family is at an all-time high, particularly regarding the legacy of Princess Diana. With the release of new documentaries and memoirs, many are re-examining the events leading up to her tragic death in 1997. The continued fascination with Diana’s life and legacy serves as a reminder of the unresolved issues that linger within the royal family.

The fallout from Anne’s statements has been immediate. Royal insiders and commentators are debating the implications of her words, questioning whether this could lead to a rift between the royal family members. Commentator Richard Fitzwilliams remarked, “This is a watershed moment. If true, it challenges everything we thought we knew about the royal family’s past.”

As the public digests this explosive news, calls for accountability are growing louder. Many are demanding that the royal family address these allegations head-on, pushing for transparency regarding their past actions and relationships.

With the royal family’s reputation hanging in the balance, Princess Anne’s bold statements may force a reckoning not only within the family but also among the British public, who have long admired and scrutinized the lives of its royal members. As the secrets of the past come to light, the world watches closely, eager for answers about one of history’s most tragic and enigmatic figures.

 

 

Prince Harry ADMITTED that Meghan hired a surrogate, saying, “She forbade me from revealing this secret; Archie is actually…”

Prince Harry Admitted That Meghan Hired a Surrogate, Saying, “She Forbade Me From Revealing This Secret; Archie Is Actually…”

In a shocking and unverified claim that has captured media attention, rumors have surfaced suggesting that Prince Harry has allegedly admitted to a long-kept secret about his son, Archie. According to these reports, Harry revealed that Meghan Markle had hired a surrogate to carry their first child, Archie, and that she had strictly forbidden him from sharing this information with the public.

The statement, if true, would shake the foundations of public perceptions of Harry and Meghan’s family life, as the couple has always presented Archie as their biological child. The rumor has further sparked intrigue, as Harry’s alleged confession hints that Archie’s true story may be different from what the public has been led to believe.

The claim that Meghan supposedly “forbade” Harry from revealing this information has fueled speculation about the level of secrecy surrounding the birth of Archie. Many observers have pointed out that the couple has maintained a fiercely private stance regarding their children, often going to great lengths to shield them from public scrutiny.

However, it’s important to note that these claims remain unsubstantiated and are part of ongoing rumors that continue to swirl around the Sussexes. No official statements have been made by Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, or their representatives regarding this issue, and it is unclear whether there is any truth to these allegations.

As with many rumors surrounding the royal family, it is essential to approach these claims with caution. The Sussexes have been the subject of numerous speculative stories, and this latest claim about the use of a surrogate has yet to be confirmed or denied by any credible source. Until any official word is released, the public can only speculate about the truth behind these allegations and how they might impact Harry and Meghan’s image moving forward.

For now, the focus remains on their efforts to raise their children in privacy, away from the pressures of royal life, regardless of the swirling rumors.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reportedly acquired a new European home, a move that comes after they were asked to vacate Frogmore Cottage earlier this year. The couple’s latest property purchase is being viewed as a fresh beginning, signaling their interest in maintaining a base in Europe amid their primary residence in Montecito, California.

According to insiders, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex sought a European home that would provide both privacy and a practical location for their international work. With their growing commitments related to the Archewell Foundation, their partnerships with streaming services, and ongoing charitable efforts, having a base in Europe could ease their travel logistics. It would also allow them to stay connected to some of their favorite parts of the continent and potentially offer a familiar environment for their children, Archie and Lilibet, to experience.

Since stepping back from their royal duties, Harry and Meghan have expressed their desire for a lifestyle that combines family focus with global outreach. Their previous home in Windsor, Frogmore Cottage, was initially intended to be their UK base, but they ultimately gave up their lease on the property at the request of King Charles. This recent purchase is seen as their answer to creating a personal retreat that meets both family and professional needs.

While the location and specifics of the home remain undisclosed, reports suggest the couple selected a countryside estate that balances seclusion with accessibility. Harry and Meghan have previously enjoyed vacations across Europe, and this new residence may allow them to further explore the continent while having a steady home base.

While the location and specifics of the home remain undisclosed, reports suggest the couple selected a countryside estate that balances seclusion with accessibility. Harry and Meghan have previously enjoyed vacations across Europe, and this new residence may allow them to further explore the continent while having a steady home base.

This European chapter may mark the beginning of a transformative period for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, providing them a renewed sense of stability and independence. Their new home represents more than just a property; it symbolizes the journey they’ve taken and the future they’re choosing to build for themselves and their family.

Prince Harry is poised to receive a substantial inheritance that has added to the ongoing discussions about his and Meghan Markle’s financial status. Recent reports highlight that Harry is set to inherit £7 million from a trust fund established by his great-grandmother, the late Queen Mother. This inheritance is expected to be transferred to him on his 40th birthday, September 15th.
The Queen Mother, with an estimated fortune of £1 million, allocated a significant portion of her wealth to a trust fund for the family. According to Australian magazine *New Idea*, citing *The Times*, Harry will receive a £7 million share from this trust fund. This amount is in addition to the considerable earnings that Harry and Meghan have accrued through high-profile deals, including their partnership with Netflix in 2020.

Harry is expected to receive a larger share of the Queen Mother’s fortune compared to his elder brother, Prince William. The financial arrangements within the royal family play a significant role here, as William, as the heir to the throne, will inherit the vast wealth of the Duke of Cornwall—a private estate that funds public, charitable, and private activities. Consequently, Harry is likely to receive slightly more than half of the £14 million allocated for both brothers.

Princess Anne is also a central figure in these financial matters. Known for her unwavering commitment to royal duties and charitable endeavors, Princess Anne plays a critical role in maintaining the royal family’s unity, particularly during times of controversy involving Prince Harry, Meghan Markle, and other family members. As a diligent member of the royal family, Princess Anne tirelessly fulfills official duties and engagements on behalf of the monarch. She serves as the patron or president of over 300 organizations across various sectors, including education, healthcare, and sports science.

In addition to her public duties, Princess Anne is the primary trustee for the trust established by Queen Elizabeth. It is common practice in the UK to manage and protect family wealth through such trusts. These trusts are designed to generate income for beneficiaries and occasionally release capital for significant expenses, such as property purchases or weddings. The Board of Trustees and their director must approve any capital release.

Following Queen Elizabeth’s death, Princess Anne is expected to take complete control of Prince Harry’s trust fund. This decision is influenced by Prince Harry’s controversial remarks about the royal family, which were deemed harmful to the nonprofit organizations he represents. Consequently, Princess Anne will oversee the majority of the funds previously allocated to Prince Harry.

Known for her extensive charitable activities and dedication to organizations that positively impact global issues, Princess Anne’s role underscores her commitment to upholding the values of the monarchy. Despite Meghan Markle’s efforts to assert her influence, Princess Anne remains a formidable figure, ensuring the integrity and continuity of the royal family’s principles and duties.

The transfer of Harry’s trust funds to Princess Anne coincides with allegations that the Sussexes have struggled to make a significant impact with their charity work in the United States. Sources indicate that the couple has faced challenges in gaining substantial visibility for their charitable endeavors and fulfilling business obligations, partly due to mental health issues. Additionally, Prince Harry’s recent statements have led to the loss of his patronage from the London Marathon Charitable Trust. His self-reported drug use, admissions of bullying, and unfounded accusations about the royal family have significantly tarnished his reputation.

Moreover, the registration of their charitable foundation in Delaware—a state known for lenient regulations regarding charitable organizations—has attracted criticism concerning the couple’s use of charity for self-promotion and financial gain. Despite these challenges, Princess Anne’s steadfast dedication to royal responsibilities and charitable work remains a cornerstone in preserving the values of the monarchy.

Meghan Markle is not close with Princess Kate, with one royal expert suggesting the Duchess of Sussex was “jealous” of her sister-in-law.

Author Ingrid Seward said Meghan is likely to have been “incredibly envious” of Kate and the relationship she had with Prince Harry. In his debut memoir Spare, Harry gushed over Kate and described her as “the sister I’ve never had and always wanted”.

Ingrid said: “I think he just adored her [Kate] and he was always there, at Kensington Palace.” Now, relationship expert Louella Alderson has given some insight into why Meghan might have been envious of the Princess of Wales.

For all the latest on news, politics, sports, and showbiz from the USA, go to The Mirror US.

READ MORE: Inside Harry and Meghan’s family holidays with Archie and Lilibet – luxury ski resort to Christmas treat

Prince Harry wrote kind things about his sister-in-law ( Image: Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images)

Speaking exclusively to The Mirror, she said: “It’s likely that Meghan felt a sense of competition with Kate. She seems to have a competitive streak and enjoys being in the spotlight.

“The constant media attention and comparisons being made between the two women may have added to the feelings of competition. No matter how secure and confident one may be, being compared to someone else on a regular basis can be challenging. Kate is adored by the public, which may have caused Meghan to feel like she had to live up to a certain standard.”

She suggested this sense of competition could have translated into jealousy. Louella suggested: “Seeing Harry’s close relationship with Kate could have triggered feelings of envy and insecurity for Meghan, making her feel like she had to compete for his attention and affection.”

Ranvir Singh breaks silence as former partner Giovanni Pernice ‘quits’ Strictly

Meghan Markle slammed over ‘laughable’ Princess Lilibet claim she said ‘with a straight face’

Amanda Abbington shares huge update as Giovanni Pernice ‘quits Strictly Come Dancing’

Louella added: “Constant competition and comparison with someone, especially when they are close family, can create a toxic dynamic and make it difficult for two people to have a genuine connection. It’s possible that Meghan’s jealousy towards Kate could have contributed to any deeper issues between the two sisters-in-law.

“In the end, it’s important to remember that both women are human and may have their own insecurities and vulnerabilities, which could have affected their relationship. There are likely many nuances and complexities to Kate and Meghan’s relationship that we may never fully understand, but it wouldn’t be surprising if jealousy played a role in their dynamic.”

Her comments come after Ingrid Seward told The Telegraph: “I think that Meghan must have been incredibly envious and then jealous of Kate. I heard Meghan actually thought she was going to be a princess and live in Windsor Castle. Instead, there’s William and Kate with this beautiful house, while they are stuck in Nottingham Cottage.”

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.

“And though William and I have talked about it once or twice, and he has made it very clear to me that his kids are not my responsibility,” Harry explained.

With the release of his book, which contains some different information about the family than was portrayed in British tabloids, Harry is hopeful that things can start to change. And despite what some people may think, including those in his family, Harry didn’t set out to tattle on the family, he simply wanted to share his side, with his own words.

“I always say: ‘What’s the difference between airing lies about your family through the British press, or airing truth through a book?’” Harry shared.

“In my case, this is all contained in one place where I hold myself entirely accountable and responsible for what I am saying.”Someone’s got to step up, right? There’s a new report that suggests Kate Middleton might be intervening in Prince Harry’s marriage.

And if she is, there’s no doubt that Meghan Markle is going to be none too pleased about it at all. Keep reading below for everything you need to know.

Kate Middleton Is Intervening In Prince Harry’s Marriage
By now it’s no secret that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have not had the best week, the best month or even the best year in their marriage.

The royal couple have made it pretty clear that they prefer to spend time apart than together. That’s because Prince Harry wants to repair his reputation and be known as a royal statesman that is to be taken seriously.

But if there’s one person who seems to be very concerned about the way things are going, it’s Harry’s sister-in-law Kate Middleton back in the UK. It’s been said that she wants to intervene in order to save Prince Harry.

But at the same time, Meghan Markle wants the Princess of Wales to keep her distance. She doesn’t think it’s any of her business.

What’s Next For Prince Harry And Meghan Markle?

Sure, Kate might want Prince Harry to be happy in his life, but that’s for Meghan to deal with and not her.

One source close to the situation even put it this way, “Up until now, Harry and Meghan have been such a unit, so it’s a huge adjustment to go without him. And, what’s making it even harder is that a lot of people are taking this change as proof that they are having difficulties in their marriage. That’s especially tough for Meghan, because her image is so tied to being Harry’s wife.”

“No matter how much they both insist that things are completely solid between them, when she turns up to events solo, the whispers start.”

So far the Princess of Wales herself has not made any comments about the matter although at this point it’s doubtful that anything will be said.

Let us know what you think by leaving us a line with your thoughts in our comments section below.

In the meantime, come back right here for all the latest updates and spoilers on your favorite daytime television shows and The British Royal Family.

Operation Paget was tasked with investigating the conspiracy theories surrounding Princess Diana’s tragic death

Diana, Princess of Wales attends a service commemorating the 70th anniversary of the armistice, at the Arc de Triomph on November 11, 1988 in Paris, France. . Photo: Anwar Hussein/Getty

Countless conspiracy theories emerged after Princess Diana’s tragic death in 1997 — and it was Operation Paget’s job to investigate them all.

The car accident that killed Princess Diana — along with her boyfriend, Dodi Al Fayed, and the driver of the car, Henri Paul — occurred in Paris on Aug. 31, 1997, when their vehicle crashed after being pursued by paparazzi. But alternative theories about Diana’s devastating death began to develop almost instantly, with the most prevalent rumor being that her death was not, in fact, an accident.

Mohamed Al Fayed, Dodi’s father, was one of the most vocal supporters of that allegation. The Egyptian businessman, who owned the British department store Harrods and the Ritz Paris at the time, alleged that the British royal family orchestrated the death of his son and the People’s Princess. He claimed that Prince Philip, Diana’s former father-in-law, ordered British security services to assassinate the royal to stop her from marrying Dodi, who was Muslim.

To investigate this theory (and other allegations), Operation Paget was formed in January 2004 at the request of the royal coroner Michael Burgess. The group of investigators — which included over a dozen senior British Metropolitan Police officers — spent three years and millions of dollars to determine the cause of Princess Diana’s death, per the BBC. In the end, their findings concluded that the car accident that killed Diana, Dodi and Paul was the result of “grossly negligent driving” — and not a royal conspiracy.

How Did Princess Diana Die? The True Story of Her Tragic Car Accident

“When you look at most incidents, accidents, you find there’s a chain of events, and if any one of those chain of events had been different, it might not have led to that happening,” David Douglas, a senior police officer and member of the Operation Paget team, explained on ITV’s Good Morning Britain, 25 years after the crash.

He added, “It’s my absolute total belief it was a terrible, tragic accident in which three people lost their lives and one other person had their life turned upside down.”

Operation Paget was also instrumental in the depiction of Diana’s death the sixth and final season of Netflix’s The Crown. The show’s executive producers worked to “delicately, thoughtfully” recreate her death by studying the nearly 900-page report, as well as other official investigations, books and documentaries, the Los Angeles Times reported.

“There’s a huge amount of respect from us all, I hope that’s evident,” executive producer Suzanne Mackie said about their work on season 6 at the Edinburgh TV Festival in August 2023.

But how did Operation Paget determine the car crash that killed Diana was accidental? Here’s everything to know about the exhaustive British investigation into Princess Diana’s death and its findings.

What was Operation Paget?

Senior investigating officer, Detective Chief Superindendent David Douglas; the former Commissioner of London’s Metropolitan Police, Lord Stevens; Deputy Commissioner Paul Stephenson and Dick Fedorcio, Director of Public Affairs attend a press conference after an official British police inquiry into the Paris car crash which killed Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed on December 14, 2006 in London, England.Scott Barbour/Getty

Conducted by the British Metropolitan Police, Operation Paget was an official investigation into the conspiracy theories surrounding the 1997 death of Princess Diana. It was launched in January 2004, after French authorities concluded their own investigation, and led by Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir John Stevens.

“Every single aspect of conspiracy theories and the like will be looked at by my team and the coroner,” Stevens said in 2004, per the BBC. “We have got to try and do everything we can to draw a line one way or another under this inquiry.”

Why was Operation Paget established?

Princess Diana and Mohammed Al Fayed attending a charity dinner for the Harefield Heart Unit held at Harrods London in February 1996.Jayne Fincher/Getty

Operation Paget was established as a result of Mohamed Al Fayed’s insistence that the deaths of his son, Dodi, and Princess Diana were not accidental.

“I believe in my heart 99.9% that it was not an accident,” Al Fayed told The Mirror in February 1998. “That car didn’t accidentally crash. There was a conspiracy. I will not rest until I have established exactly what happened.”

Al Fayed believed that Diana’s death was ordered by Prince Philip and carried out by Britain’s MI6 to prevent her from marrying his son, a Muslim. Because the claims alleged crimes committed on British soil — specifically, conspiracy to commit murder — the police inquest was legally necessary, according to the BBC.

What did Operation Paget involve?

Scott Barbour/Getty

Operation Paget expanded to not only investigate Al Fayed’s claims, but also any allegations that were made in the media, legal submissions and formal correspondence since the crash occurred in 1997. The extensive investigation involved a dozen experienced police officers, took nearly three years to complete and cost millions, according to The New York Times.

To help conduct their investigation, British authorities collected more than 600 pieces of evidence and re-examined the information uncovered by the French inquiries, The New York Times reported. They also enlisted the help of lasers, computer models and 3D technology to recreate the scene of the crash, according to the BBC, to provide an “enhanced understanding” of the accident.

Why was King Charles interviewed for Operation Paget?

Prince Charles, Prince of Wales with his fiance Lady Diana Spencer during a photocall before their wedding while staying at Craigowan Lodge on the Balmoral Estate in Scotland.Tim Graham Photo Library/Getty

British investigators interviewed more than 300 individuals for Operation Paget — including the future King Charles.

Charles was questioned by U.K. police in 2005 in relation to a note that Princess Diana had written in 1995. The note read: “My husband is planning ‘an accident’ in my car, brake failure and serious head injury … to make the path clear for him to marry.”

Diana also alleged in the note, which was made public by the Daily Mail in 2003, that Charles wanted to marry Tiggy Legge-Bourke, a nanny for Prince William and Prince Harry. Additionally, she claimed that Charles’ now-wife, Queen Camilla, “is nothing but a decoy.”

The interview with Prince Charles secretly took place on Dec. 6, 2005, at St. James’s Palace in London and was conducted by Stevens, the former head of Scotland Yard and the head of Operation Paget. During their meeting, Stevens read Charles Diana’s note — and asked him if he had discussed it with her or knew of her feelings. Charles declined having any knowledge of the note.

“At the end of the day he was incredibly cooperative because he had nothing to hide,” Stevens told the Daily Mail in 2021 about the interview.

What did Operation Paget conclude?

A Memorial for Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed.John Harper/Getty

After nearly three years, Operation Paget concluded its inquiry and published an 871-page report with its findings. The report, which was made public on Dec. 14, 2006, ultimately concluded that Princess Diana’s death was an accident and there was no validity to the various conspiracy theories that had surfaced over the years.

“Our conclusion is that, on the evidence available at this time, there was no conspiracy to murder any of the occupants of the car,” Stevens said as he presented his findings, per The New York Times. “This was a tragic accident.”

The report also debunked the rumors that Diana was pregnant at the time of the crash, that her calls were being monitored by Britain’s MI6 and that her house was bugged. It did confirm, however, that Henri Paul — the driver of the vehicle — was drunk and driving at an excessive speed, and that the seat belts in the vehicle were not used.  However, Stevens did not blame any of those factors as the sole cause of the deadly crash.

“A crash of this nature is similar to a major crash of an airliner,” he said, per The New York Times. “There is a long chain of events. Take out any link of that chain and this would not have happened.”

In October 2007, the evidence and findings from Operation Paget were used at the official coroner’s inquest into Princess Diana’s death. Six months later, in April 2008, the jury ruled that the deaths had been caused by “grossly negligent driving.” The jurors also cited the speed and erratic driving of both the Mercedes and the following vehicles, the driver Henri Paul’s intoxication and the fact that the deceased were not wearing seat belts as contributing factors.

What was the reaction to Operation Paget’s findings?

Prince William and Prince Harry with Prince Charles at Westminster Abbey for the funeral of Diana, Princess of Wales.Tim Graham Photo Library/Getty

Before the Operation Paget report was released to the public, Prince William and Prince Harry were briefed on its findings by Stevens. According to The Independent, William and Harry welcomed the report’s “conclusive findings” in their mother’s death.

“It was quite emotional,” Stevens later told The Daily Beast about his meeting with Diana’s two sons, echoing that they were satisfied with the report’s conclusions.

However, Al Fayed — whose claims of conspiracy helped launch Operation Paget — was displeased with the initial findings of the three-year investigation. Following the report’s publication, he dismissed it as “garbage” and a “cover-up,” according to The Independent.

“I’m certain 100 percent that a leading member of the royal family has planned that and that the whole plot was executed on his order with the help of members of MI6,” he told reporters after the report was published in December 2006, per The New York Times.

But after the completion of the coroner’s inquest in 2008, where 11 jurors found Dodi and Diana’s deaths to be the result of “negligent driving,” Fayed shared he was “disappointed” — but ultimately accepted the verdict.

“I’ve had enough,” he told Britain’s ITV News at Ten. “I’m leaving this to God to get my revenge.”

How did Operation Paget inform The Crown showrunners?

‘The Crown’.Netflix

The sixth and final season of the award-winning Netflix series The Crown depicts Princess Diana’s death — and took careful consideration with how they would portray the tragic event.

Netflix confirmed in October 2022 that the “exact moment of the crash impact will not be shown,”  and in August 2023 the show’s executive producers, Andy Harries and Suzanne Mackie, spoke more about the approach they took with Diana’s death.

“There were very careful, long conversations about how we were going to do it,” Mackie said at the Edinburgh TV Festival. “The audience will judge it in the end, but I think it’s been delicately, thoughtfully recreated.”

What Happens to Princess Diana in The Crown Season 6? A Look at the Real-Life Events

Part of that thoughtful recreation involved gathering information from the investigations that were conducted after Princess Diana’s death, including Operation Paget. Though The Crown does not address any of the conspiracy theories that developed following the Paris car crash, it does adhere to Operation Paget’s findings that the accident was a result of negligent driving, according to the Los Angeles Times.

“We very much followed the given facts,” Christian Schwochow, who directed two episodes of season 6, told the Los Angeles Times.

The Crown’s research team also referred to Operation Paget to understand more about Diana and Dodi’s romance in the weeks leading up to the accident and how the events unfolded that summer.

“We needed to understand not only the timeline of the events that summer but also Dodi and Diana’s emotional states and the evolving nature of their short relationship,” Annie Sulzberger, head of research on the series, told the outlet.

From her tensions with Prince Charles to her constant battle with the paparazzi, The Princess tells the story of Princess Diana’s public life through real-life archival audio and footage

Princess Diana. Photo: VINCENT AMALVY/AFP

01of 10

Life in the Spotlight

Tim Graham Photo Library

Just before their wedding, Prince Charles and Princess Diana sat down for a joint interview and spoke about the glare of the royal spotlight.

“If you don’t try to work out in your own mind some kind of method for existing and surviving this kind of thing, you would go mad, I think. In the end, you do get used to it,” Charles says before turning to Diana and asking: “Don’t you find that after the last six months you’re beginning to get used to it?”

Diana quietly responds, “Just.”

02of 10

The Wedding

Princess Diana and Prince Charles. Anwar Hussein/Getty

As Princess Diana and Prince Charles leave their wedding ceremony, a commentator says, “Usually fairy tales end here with the phrase ‘and they lived happily ever after.’ ” While footage shows celebrations throughout the U.K., including dancing and popping champagne in the streets, we know now that Princess Diana never got her storybook ending. The couple seemed to know something was amiss at the time too — as they pulled up to Buckingham Palace in their carriage, they were completely silent with no loving interactions or cheerful expressions expected of newlyweds.

03of 10

Diana’s Popularity

Princess Diana and Prince Charles. Jayne Fincher/Princess Diana Archive/Getty

During a 1983 tour of Australia, overwhelming crowds gathered everywhere that Princess Diana and Prince Charles visited. But it was clear that they were there to see Diana — as one commentator noted in the documentary, “You can’t give pictures of him away, but Diana is very big news everywhere.” Prince Charles recognized that he was playing second fiddle to his new wife, asking photographers, “Am I in the way?”

“Charles doesn’t like the fact that she’s a superstar, and he isn’t,” another commentator notes.

04of 10

“Trapped”

Princess Diana, Prince William and Prince Charles. Diana Archive/Getty

In an interaction between the royals and members of the media, Prince Charles talks to a young Prince William as Princess Diana looks on glumly. As Prince William peers through a video camera lens, Charles tells his son, “The people in there, look at them…trapped.” The irony of the statement is not lost on viewers.

05of 10

Diana’s Loneliness

Princess Diana. Anwar Hussein/Getty

While Prince Charles “continued to live like a bachelor” despite being a husband and father, Princess Diana was clearly feeling isolated in her royal life. During a 1992 visit to the Taj Mahal, a monument built by a man to pay tribute to his wife, Princess Diana ironically posed for photos alone — and it spoke volumes about the state of the couple’s marriage at the time.

Diana looks uneasy as she’s being photographed on a bench in front of the Taj Mahal, putting on her sunglasses as she stood. She then walked over to another bench and sat with her back towards the photographers in a moment of solitude.

“So she’s just sitting there, is she?” one cameraman is heard asking.

“Thinking about her marriage,” says another.

06of 10

Dodging Paparazzi

Princess Diana. Daily Mirror/Mirrorpix/Getty

After Princess Diana and Prince Charles announced their separation, paparazzi climbed on ladders and ran into traffic to capture Diana on everyday outings, such as going to the gym and attending Prince William and Prince Harry’s school events. As Princess Diana tried to escape them, her car is shown speeding away — an ominous foreshadowing of her tragic death just a few years later.

07of 10

William and Harry Run from the Cameras

Princess Diana. Princess Diana Archive/Getty

The documentary intercuts Princess Diana’s 1993 speech, in which she announced she would be reducing her public appearances, with shots of her and her sons avoiding paparazzi. Both Prince William and Prince Harry are seen running away from the cameras and shielding their faces with hats.

“When I started my public life 12 years ago, I understood the media might be interested in what I did. I realized then their attention would inevitably focus on both our private and public lives,” Diana said in her speech. “But I was not aware of how overwhelming that attention would become, nor the extent to which it would affect both my public duties and my personal life in a manner that’s been hard to bear.”

However, she was again met with criticism: “It’s very Diana, isn’t it, to call a press conference to announce that she wants to be left alone,” said one commentator. “Very in character.”

08of 10

Coming Into Her Own

Princess Diana. Princess Diana Archive/Getty

Following her divorce, Princess Diana focused on charities and causes with special meaning to her, from homelessness to HIV/AIDS. “Good work and associating one’s self with good voluntary causes, that, I think, is the sort of direction that the Princess of Wales see herself moving in,” one commentator said before adding, in a now-ominous statement: “She has 20, 30, 40 years of active public life ahead of her. So people who think this is the end of something, you’re misunderstanding. This is the beginning of something.”

09of 10

The Crash

GABRIEL BOUYS/AFP

Home video showed a group of friends playing Uno as the news that Princess Diana was involved in a car crash in Paris unfolded on television. Although the men were making light of the coverage, the mood quickly shifted and they all fell silent when it was announced that Diana had died. The scene reflects how Princess Diana had become a source of entertainment for many, and it wasn’t until her untimely death that there was concern for her as a person.

10of 10

William and Harry in Mourning

Prince William, Prince Harry and Prince Charles. Tim Graham Photo Library

Prince William and Prince Harry, just 15 and 12 at the time, had just lost their mother. However, in the days following her death, they played the roles of consolers to members of the public. In the documentary, the grieving brothers are seen shaking hands and greeting people gathered outside Kensington Palace.

Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip are also shown viewing the public memorial to Diana outside the palace. In one tense moment, a woman calls out: “Take care of the boys.” Philip then curtly responds: “That’s what we’ve been doing.”

The exchange reflects the public criticism at the time that the Queen hadn’t been doing enough to comfort her subjects in the wake of Diana’s death.