Blog

It was the honeymoon photos of the new Princess of Wales that clinched it for me to join Camp Diana.

I’d always disliked the Royal Family, what with their ethos of hunting, shooting and fishing. The bear skin hats worn for ceremonial duties. Their love of horse racing and polo. Fly fishing!

But the sight of Diana at Balmoral, clearly itchy in scratchy, dowdy tweed, trying to mask her boredom, made the animal lovers among us cheer her to the rafters.

We swiftly fell in love with her refusal to not only kill animals for pleasure, but to refuse to be stiff and formal, and to go on to champion unpopular causes such as campaigning for victims of Aids, eating disorders, and poor mental health.

+8

The the sight of Diana at Balmoral, clearly itchy in scratchy, dowdy tweed, trying to mask her boredom, made the animal lovers among us cheer her to the rafters

+8

Princess Diana announcing on Panorama that ‘there were three of us in this marriage’

+8

The Welsh Guards alongside the gun carriage carrying the coffin of Diana, Princess of Wales

+8

Camilla in 1999 sipping sherry and going out with the Beaufort Hunt at Didmarton

+8

Charles and Camilla’s wedding in 2005 still left Liz Jones unconvinced

Camilla was of course the villain of the piece. When the taped conversations between her and Charles were released (I used to sit in my office, dialling The Sun phone line to pay to listen to them, open mouthed), not to mention the moment Diana, during her BBC interview with Martin Bashir, revealed ‘There were three of us in this marriage’, I and any woman who had ever been cheated on, lied to, humiliated by a man would forever hold Diana in the highest esteem for her courage to speak out. When she died in Paris in 1997, the grief was personal, genuine, overwhelming. I didn’t sob as hard when my own father died a year later: I had no more tears left to shed.

When Camilla finally married the man she had always been in love with, I was unconvinced, unexcited. I simply did not want to know. How dare she have made Diana so unhappy, so cast aside? She wasn’t as young, nowhere near as beautiful. Yes, she and Charles had more in common, but they should have decided that sooner!

I only really started to thaw towards Camilla, drip by drip, after Queen Elizabeth died. She seemed to possess quiet dignity. Other women suddenly seemed really strident, and loud. Remember the way Camilla calmed Charles down when he was annoyed by a pen and ink? As the culture changed, and women embraced MeToo, refusing to be victims, the fact Camilla had never whined, or looked bored, or bleated doe eyed to a camera, ‘I’m not okay’ was suddenly a beacon of strength.

When Charles was diagnosed with cancer, she didn’t sit by his bed stroking his hand, she dusted herself off and got on with it, working hard, with a smile on her face. When her beloved brother, environmentalist Mark Shand, died, she took up the mantle, raising money to help with the conservation of Asian elephants.

I always disliked the fact she enjoyed fox hunting, was pictured mounted, sipping sherry. When hunting with hounds became illegal, she gave it up even as many others carried on. That she no longer takes part in a blood sport she had been brought up to enjoy, and which seemed normal to her and her class (Charles loved it too), is a welcome step in the right direction. Yes, we can change, yes we can bend to the will of the people.

+8

The vegan Coronation scroll was a triumph for animal lovers

+8

Camilla was seen calming the situation down when the King seemed annoyed by a pen

+8

Camilla wrote to PETA to announce that she would no longer buy anything using animal fur

Earlier this week, Camilla wrote to PETA, the animal rights campaign group, to announce she would no longer buy anything using animal fur. It is a small step, as she might still wear vintage fur on occasion. Not quite as heart-warming as Queen Elizabeth, sat alongside a straight-backed rescued beagle called Guy in her car on the way to Meghan’s wedding rehearsal, not an Awwww moment, but welcome nonetheless.

Camilla’s decision joins a long list of animal friendly actions taken by the Royal Family in recent months. Earlier this month, the RSPCA announced that King Charles is its new patron, saying, ‘His Majesty’s powerful voice for nature and regenerative farming will be vital in raising the profile of animal welfare and inspire more people than ever to create a better world for every animal.’ Foie gras is no longer served in the Royal Household, and the Coronation Roll, the official record of last year’s ceremony, was produced on paper not parchment, which is made from animal skin. But Rome wasn’t built in a day. A 2023 Guardian investigation reported that over the past two decades Sandringham ‘has been linked to the deaths and disappearances of a string of legally protected birds’.

Animal Aid found that more than 7,000 mammals and birds were killed on Royal land in one year. Among that number, thousands of foxes and corvids were killed in order to protect the estate’s pheasants from predators. Snares are banned in Wales and Scotland, but not in England. In 2021, PETA wrote to the then Prince of Wales with a request to ban snares at Sandringham, but claims not to have received a response to this day. Balmoral is used to hosting ‘straightforward’ shooting parties.

But I do think Camilla is listening to what the ordinary British public want. According to the RSPCA, 95 per cent of us disagree with wearing fur. Charles clearly takes note of her advice. I like to imagine her whispering in his ear, gently persuading and guiding. So, Camp Camilla it is. Non-bearskin hats off to her. I cannot wait to see what long-held tradition will meet a sticky end next…

The eldest son of David Beckham and Victoria Beckham revealed which member of the Royal Family they used to see “the most often” whilst on a talk show this week.

Retired footballer David, 49, and former Spice Girl Victoria, 50, are thought to be long-term friends with members of the Royal Family for some time. The couple, who each have an OBE, have attended various royal events over the years.

Their eldest child Brooklyn Beckham, 25, was asked about the connection whilst on Watch What Happens Live! on Monday night. He spoke to host Andy Cohen, 56, whilst a guest on the Bravo show in the US with Zachary Quinto. During the episode, Andy read out a question from a viewer that wanted to know which members of the Royal Family Brooklyn saw most often growing up.

They referenced Prince Harry, 40, and Meghan Markle, 43, in the question. Reading the question out, Andy said: “Growing up, which members of the Royal Family did you see the most often, especially since your family is friends with Harry and Meghan?” After taking a moment to think, Brooklyn replied.

He shared with the presenter that it was “probably” Prince William, 42, and made no mention of his parents’ former pals Meghan and Harry. Brooklyn responded to the question: “Probably William, yeah.” Andy then asked: “What’s he like? Is there something about him that people don’t get? Is he fun?”

Brooklyn Beckham, pictured, was asked about the Royal Family on a talk show this week ( 
Image:
Getty Images)

He shared his thoughts on Prince William, pictured, during the interview on Watch What Happens Live! ( 
Image:
Getty Images)
Brooklyn said about King Charles III’s eldest son: “He’s just like the sweetest guy ever. He really is.” The guest went on to comment about the heir to the throne whilst on the show: “He’s really down to earth. He’s really [a] good guy.”

David and Victoria have been associated with the Royal Family for a number of years. The couple have notably attended two royal weddings, with them first guests at Prince William’s nuptials to Princess Kate, now 42, more than a decade ago. The wedding was held at Westminster Abbey in 2011. More recently, Brooklyn’s parents attended Prince Harry and Meghan’s wedding in 2018. Those nuptials were held at St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle.

It was later reported that Prince William and Princess Kate had been invited to Brooklyn’s wedding to Nicola Peltz, now 29, in 2022. There was speculation that the Beckhams ‘agonised’ over whether to invite Prince William and his wife, or Prince Harry and his wife, given an alleged rift between the two couples.

The family are said to have chosen Prince William and Princess Kate in the end due to their long history of friendship. A source said last year: “David and Victoria wrote to William and Kate inviting them and the family to their son’s wedding, and William replied wishing them a great deal of joy but they are unable to attend.”

Harper Beckham wowed her mother Victoria Beckham, as the pair attended a chic event in London as a duo.

The designer, 50, was at the Claridge’s Hotel in London this Tuesday, November 6, as she received Harper’s Bazaar Entrepreneur of the Year Award – and who better than her daughter Harper to hand her the award?

For the occasion, Victoria Beckham cut an classy figure with an ivory silk trouser suit, while the 13-year-old – whom Victoria shares with husband David Beckham – donned a silky white dress to match.

Taking to the stage to accept her award, given to her for her “innovation and dedication to the British and global fashion industry”, the former Spice Girl couldn’t contain her glee as she praised her “poise” and “elegance.”

Parents rave over ‘brilliant’ skincare products that clear up teen skin ‘within a few days’

Victoria Beckham and her daughter Harper attended Harper’s Bazaar Women of the Year Awards ( 
Image:
Dave Benett/Getty Images for Har)

The former Spice Girl was given the Entrepreneur of the Year Award ( 
Image:
Dave Benett/Getty Images for Har)

“I am so, so proud of you”, she said, according to The Daily Mail, “I mean getting up on stage in front of a room full of people is scary and you did it with such poise and such elegance.” The youngest child of the Beckham children has had plenty of practice at public events as she has previously gone to her fashion events, and the premiere of her parents’ Netflix documentary.

But while she attended the 2024 Harper’s Bazaar Women of the Year Awards, Victoria Beckham skipped the red carpet, sneaking into the event without having to pose with her peers – something she later accepted to do with her daughter Harper, after being presented with her accolade. Meanwhile, stars in the likes of Sophie Turner, Maya Jama and even This Morning’s Cat Deeley all posed for photographs.

While she has impressed her mother, Harper Beckham has also managed to gather a large following on social media, stealing the show with her Instagram posts as Victoria has often shown her off on her own platforms. Victoria once branded her daughter as her “mini-me” in a recent social media post, commenting that Harper is “following in mummy’s footsteps” when the teen revealed she had plans to create her own brand.

Both David and Victoria have both used the hashtag #HarperSeven when sharing photos of their youngest child, which references her full name – Harper Seven Beckham. Victoria has also made a huge move in securing Harper’s future as she has incorporated a business called H7B Limited. It will funnel any future earnings for Harper, according to the Sun. Posh Spice and a solicitor are listed as its director. Harper could soon earn millions from huge brand deals as well as the potential to launch her own business, making her dreams come true.

Back in October, during one of her mother’s events, Harper took to the dream station that was upheld at the launch party, putting pen to paper to write down her thoughts. Harper wrote on two pieces of card with the teenager hoping she would “create an amazing brand when I’m older.” In a second card filled out by Harper, she wrote that she wanted “everyone to be happy in life.”

Meghan Markle channeled the fashion prowess of Princess Diana as she recreated her late mother-in-law’s iconic blazer ensemble upon her return to Los Angeles.

The Duchess of Sussex, 42, and Prince Harry, 39, arrived back in the US on Monday after an 18-hour flight home from their three-day trip to Nigeria.

Mother-of-two Meghan sported a sophisticated, 90s-inspired outfit as she landed at Los Angeles International Airport, typing quickly on her phone as she walked.

The actress-turned-royal donned a khaki linen and wool mix blazer from Loro Piana, called the Jamilla, which retails for around £2,900.

Underneath her jacket, the Duchess wore a cashmere and silk mix sweater – the Takao Jumper – also from Loro Piana, which costs £990.

+5

Meghan sported a sophisticated, 90s inspired outfit as she landed at Los Angeles International Airport yesterday – similar to one Princess Diana wore

+5

In the autumn of 1994, the late Princess of Wales was snapped shopping in Knightsbridge sporting a very similar ensemble

Meghan co-ordinated the ensemble with a pair of £815 Chris canvas and leather slippers from Yves Saint Laurent in the gold brown colour way.

She then tied it the ensemble together with pair of fitted, cropped white jeans – a style she has favoured multiple times in the past.

But eagle-eyed royal fans may notice how similar the outfit is to one famously worn by Princess Diana while out shopping in London.

In the autumn of 1994, the late Princess of Wales was snapped shopping in Knightsbridge sporting a chic blazer and white trousers.

She opted to wear a pair of oversized sunglasses, a cream turtleneck with a jade green blazer and an ivory and brown back elegantly slung over her shoulder.

She paired this with a brown belt and some white skinny jeans, along with shoes that look almost identical to the flats worn by Meghan.

This isn’t the first time the Duchess has channeled her mother-in-law. During the tour in Nigeria, Meghan looked to her for inspiration when choosing her accessories.

Meghan sported chunky gold earrings from Lanvin, her AURate collar necklace and an array of dazzling bracelets, as well as her wedding rings.

+5

Meghan Markle has seemingly paid a subtle tribute to her late mother-in-law Princess Diana as she joined Prince Harry on a ‘three-day royal tour’ in Nigeria

+5

The jewels resembled those worn by Diana when she visited the country in 1990 with her then-husband Charles, just two years before they separated

The jewels resembled those worn by Diana when she visited Nigeria herself with her then-husband Charles, just two years before they separated.

Meghan added a bit more glamour by wearing Diana’s gold Cartier Tank Française watch.

The gold £17,800 watch was worn by Diana at a number of occasions, including a 1997 visit to London’s Shri Swaminarayan Mandir Hindu Temple and an engagement at the British Lung Foundation that same year.

Meghan is known to be a fan of the elegant timepiece and splurged on her own two-tone version back in 2015 when Suits was picked up for a third season.

Meghan has been gifted several items from Diana’s collection. They include Diana’s butterfly earrings and gold bracelet which she wore on their Australian tour in 2018.

Yet the watch is a favourite and she has been spotted wearing it often. The watch had been gifted to Diana by her father on her 21st birthday.

+5

On May 10, Meghan was spotted wearing the AURate collar necklace with a chic white suit

Harry and Meghan were spotted arriving in Los Angeles on Monday after a marathon 18-hour flight from Nigeria amid a row over their charity’s operating status in California.

The couple, were pictured being whisked away by a car at Los Angeles International Airport’s ‘Private Suites’ facility.

The Duke and Duchess have called the semi-royal tour ‘fantastic’ and said it will be the ‘first of many memorable trips’ – which included a moment where Meghan hailed Nigeria as ‘her country’ after a DNA test suggested she was part-Nigerian.

They landed back in the United States a few hours before Californian authorities confirmed a ‘delinquency’ row involving their charitable endeavour, the Archewell Foundation, had been resolved following confusion over an unprocessed cheque.

California’s Department of Justice listed the charity, which brought in around $9million (£7.1million) less in donations in 2022 than it did the year before, as ‘not in good standing’ because of an alleged failure to pay a $200 renewal fee.

Harper Beckham supported her mother Victoria Beckham at an awards ceremony earlier this week at which the former Spice Girls member was herself honoured.

Victoria, 50, was among those celebrated at the Harper’s Bazaar Women of the Year Awards on Tuesday. She joined a host of other celebrities at the event, which was held at Claridge’s in London, and was accompanied by Harper, 13.

Harper is the youngest of fashion designer Victoria’s four children with retired footballer David Beckham, 49. The couple are also parents to sons Brooklyn Beckham, 25, Romeo Beckham, 22, and Cruz Beckham, 19, together.

At the awards ceremony, Harper introduced her mother on stage to collect the accolade for Entrepreneur of the Year. As reported by Harper’s Bazaar, she said: “The winner is someone I have always looked up to. [She’s shown] me the value of working hard, dreaming big and setting my standards. […] Tonight I am so proud to present the Entrepreneur Of The Year award to a truly inspiring woman who means the world to me, my amazing mummy, Victoria Beckham.”

I’m a fashion writer and these are my top partywear picks from Roman

Harper Beckham (left) supported her mother Victoria Beckham (right) at the Harper’s Bazaar Women of the Year Awards this week ( 
Image:
Dave Benett/Getty Images for Harper’s Bazaar UK)

Harper is the youngest of Victoria’s four children with David Beckham and there’s speculation that she could have her own brand in the future ( 
Image:
Samir Hussein/WireImage)

Before accepting the award, Victoria said at the podium that Harper had given the introduction with “such poise and such elegance”. She then said to her daughter: “I am so proud of the incredible young lady that you have become.” It comes following reports that David and Victoria are preparing for Harper to have a career in the public eye in the future. The speculation comes amid the Sun reporting that Victoria has incorporated a business, H7B Limited, for the future and it’s been teased that Harper could land lucrative brand deals when she’s older.

A source told the Sun: “There is huge demand from brands who see her as someone lots of other teens would look up to. Posh and Becks can see her potential and she wants to try some things out in the public eye.” They added that the “wheels are in motion” to “slowly book some jobs” for Harper. Whilst a source also told the outlet: “Right now, this is purely an administrative thing.” They said that Harper’s parents have “no immediate plans” for anything “commercial,” with the source describing it as an “exciting” option for her in the future.

Just last month, it was teased that Harper hopes to have a brand of her own in the future. Victoria teased that Harper was following in her footsteps at the launch of her new perfume Reverie in New York. As previously reported, one clip shared by Victoria showed Harper writing her hopes for the future on pieces of card, including that she will “create an amazing brand when I’m older”. Victoria wrote in her caption: “Harper Seven following in mummy’s footsteps and putting her hopes and dreams out there”.

Follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Threads.

 

Prince Harry is reported to have opined that Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, possesses the qualities to lead the royal family into modernity, according to royal biographer Angela Levin.

 

 

In an interview with Uncancelled’s Dan Wooton, Levin delved into the couple’s perspectives on the monarchy’s need for updates and Meghan’s potential role in such a transformation.

Harry] thinks that it was very bad that Meghan wasn’t questioned about what should be done to make the royal family up to date,” Angela said in the interview published on Monday, April 8, about the dynamic Prince Harry and Meghan shared with the firm before they moved to California.

And [Meghan] said herself that she felt that they should have asked her what should be done rather than Kate because she is a self-made woman and she’s got much more experience,” she went on.

Levin, who spent considerable time with Harry while penning the biography “Harry: Conversations with the Prince,” also reflected on Queen Elizabeth II’s efforts to accommodate the Sussexes within the royal fold. The late queen’s concessions, including offering top aides and allowing Meghan the flexibility to continue her acting career, highlighted attempts to integrate Meghan’s preferences into royal life.

However, Levin suggests a premeditated plan by Meghan to exit the royal setting, fueled by ambitions extending beyond her royal title and financial expectations.

The biographer further critiqued the Sussexes’ motives, accusing them of aiming to dismantle the traditional royal framework and alter media dynamics, particularly the print press. Harry’s legal battles against media entities over privacy violations and defamation underscore his contentious relationship with the press, aligning with Levin’s portrayal of a broader strategy to reshape media engagement.

 

In a surprising turn of events, Prince William and Prince Harry have reportedly joined forces to expel Queen Camilla from the palace, fueled by newly surfaced evidence related to their mother, Princess Diana. This dramatic development has sent shockwaves through the royal family and raised questions about the stability of the monarchy.

 

 

The relationship between the brothers has often been a subject of intense public interest, especially in the wake of Harry’s departure from royal duties and his move to the United States. However, the emergence of this evidence seems to have rekindled a bond between William and Harry, united by their shared desire to protect their mother’s legacy. Sources close to the royals suggest that the evidence presented points to troubling interactions involving Camilla and the circumstances surrounding Diana’s life and untimely death.

As the details of this evidence began to circulate, it reignited old wounds for both princes. Diana, who was often portrayed as the “People’s Princess,” was beloved by the public but faced immense scrutiny and pressure from the royal institution. In the years following her tragic death in 1997, rumors and speculation about her relationship with Camilla have persisted, painting a picture of rivalry and betrayal that has never fully faded. Many believe that Camilla’s relationship with Charles played a significant role in the strain on Diana’s marriage, leading to a breakdown that was highly publicized and deeply painful for the royal family.

With the weight of this historical context, William and Harry’s decision to act against Camilla appears to be driven by a desire to honor their mother and rectify perceived injustices. Reports indicate that the brothers met privately to discuss their shared concerns, and they concluded that taking a stand against Camilla was necessary for their family and for Diana’s memory. This unprecedented alliance signifies a pivotal moment for the brothers, as they put aside past grievances in pursuit of a common cause.

The potential consequences of this alliance are far-reaching. For Camilla, being expelled from the palace would not only impact her role within the royal family but also affect her public image. Once regarded as a controversial figure, she has worked hard to establish herself as a respected member of the monarchy. However, this new alliance between William and Harry could threaten her position and lead to significant changes within the palace hierarchy.

The public reaction to these developments is likely to be mixed. Many royal watchers and fans of Diana may view William and Harry’s actions as a noble effort to protect their mother’s legacy, while others may criticize the brothers for their confrontational approach. The monarchy has long been a symbol of stability, and such internal conflicts could create a sense of uncertainty among the public, who often look to the royal family for unity and continuity.

Additionally, this incident raises broader questions about the future of the monarchy itself. As younger generations of royals grapple with their roles in a changing world, the handling of family disputes and the preservation of historical legacies become increasingly relevant. William and Harry’s actions may set a precedent for how personal and familial grievances are addressed within the royal context.

In conclusion, the reported alliance between Prince William and Prince Harry to kick Queen Camilla out of the palace amid evidence related to Princess Diana is a significant moment in royal history. This development not only highlights the enduring impact of Diana’s legacy but also underscores the complexities of family dynamics within the royal family. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how the monarchy will navigate this crisis and what it means for the future of the institution.

Meghan Markle’s strained relationship with her father has drawn significant media attention in recent years. The father-daughter pair have remained out of contact, with the Duchess of Sussex reportedly restricting her father’s access to his grandchildren due to their rift.

Meghan Markle, now a part of the British royal family through her marriage to Prince Harry, shares two children with him. While she maintains a close bond with her mother, Doria Ragland, her relationship with her father, Thomas Markle, took a different turn, resulting in a well-publicized estrangement.

Meghan Markle on September 17, 2005 in Los Angeles, California. | Source: Getty Images

Meghan and her father used to have a warm relationship. In a 2021 interview, Thomas shared an emotional memory of his daughter’s birth in 1981, noting that he was the first to hold her. “I fell in love with her and I’d been that way for 40 years,” said the Pennsylvania native who has two older children from his first marriage.

Meghan also reflected on her childhood in an essay for Elle magazine and revealed her parents met in the late ’70s. Her father worked as a lighting director for a soap opera, while her mother was a temp at the studio.

Meghan Markle on the set of “Deal or No Deal,” 2006 | Source: Getty Images

After marrying in 1979, the couple moved to an affordable, tree-lined neighborhood in L.A.’s San Fernando Valley. Despite the close-knit bond she shared with both parents in her early years, Meghan’s family life shifted when her parents divorced in 1987.

Meghan Markle attends the DPA pre-Emmy Gift Lounge on September 18, 2009, in Beverly Hills,

As she grew up, the public figure pursued a career in acting, eventually crossing paths with Prince Harry in 2016. Yet, in the midst of her rising success and high-profile relationship, her father made a mistake by entertaining the media which later contributed to the strain in their relationship.

Amid Meghan and Prince Harry’s engagement in 2017, Thomas faced health issues, including a heart attack just days before the wedding in May 2018. He shared that stress, partly due to his eldest daughter’s public remarks against Meghan, worsened his condition.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle on November 27, 2017, in London, England. | Source: Getty Images

After a brief stay at a hospital in Mexico, Thomas expressed concerns about his health, fearing he might suffer another heart attack. During that same period, news broke that he wouldn’t attend the wedding and his ill-health was partly the reason why.

Just ahead of the ceremony, Meghan announced in a statement from Kensington Palace, “Sadly, my father will not be attending our wedding.” As a result, Thomas missed the opportunity to walk his daughter down the aisle though he felt her mother was a good choice to do the honors.

Meghan Markle on her wedding day on May 19, 2018, in Windsor Castle. | Source: Getty Images

In his absence, then Prince Charles ultimately walked Meghan down the aisle. Reflecting on this, Thomas expressed his appreciation saying, “I certainly couldn’t have asked for a better replacement. Although, I would love to have done that.”

King Charles III walking Meghan Markle down the aisle in

In addition to his health woes, the father of three missed the wedding following backlash over staged photos he sold to a photo agency. He explained that he hadn’t intended to harm Meghan or the Royal Family, but was frustrated with paparazzi who had repeatedly caught him in unflattering situations, often misrepresenting him.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle leaving St George’s Chapel on May 19, 2018, in Windsor, England. | Source: Getty Images

Thomas divulged that he had declined high-paying interview offers since Meghan started dating the prince. He accepted a smaller fee from a photo agency, hoping the images would improve his public image. However, he later admitted the photos looked “stupid and hammy” and expressed regret over his decision.

Thomas’s secret collaboration with a British paparazzo for staged photos caused embarrassment for the Royal Family ahead of the wedding, especially after Prince Harry’s earlier pleas for media restraint.

Chelsea Davy Set to Take Bold Stand Against Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

In a surprising turn of events that has sent royal watchers into a frenzy, Chelsea Davy, Prince Harry’s former long-term girlfriend, appears to be ready to take a stand against her past association with the Duke of Sussex. The 39-year-old entrepreneur, who has largely stayed out of the limelight since her breakup with Harry, recently made headlines for reasons unrelated to her successful jewelry business. Rumors are swirling that Chelsea is preparing to take legal action against both Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, accusing them of defamation.

This alleged legal confrontation, fueled by viral gossip and insider whispers, paints a picture of simmering tensions and unresolved grievances. Now a successful businesswoman and mother of two, Chelsea is happily married to hotel heir Sam Cutmore-Scott. Yet, her past relationship with Prince Harry seems to have resurfaced with a vengeance. But what could have triggered this bold move from the typically poised and private Chelsea?

Prince Louis is growing up in a Royal Family that is evolving, with his parents, Prince William and Kate Middleton, aiming to modernize the monarchy. As the fourth in line to the throne, Louis is unlikely to become king but still holds a meaningful role within the family, much like the siblings of past kings and queens.

However, some question whether it’s fair for Louis to constantly be in the shadow of his older brother, Prince George, who is destined for the throne. Perhaps it’s time for the Royal Family to consider allowing younger royals to step away from traditional roles and explore their own paths.

Prince Harry’s experience as the “spare” – a position that often felt secondary to his brother William – might serve as a lesson. Growing up without the same future responsibilities, he ultimately chose a different direction, seeking independence beyond royal duties. This could inspire a similar approach for Prince Louis and others in his position.

Why Prince Louis should be stripped of his royal titles

The estranged prince has spoken out about how he’s worried that both Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis will meet the same fate as him in the future; that they won’t be taken care of in the same way as Prince George, who one day will be king.

By all accounts, William and Kate Middleton want to modernize the monarchy and raise their children as normally as possible. But if it it’s ‘normal’ they’re striving for, isn’t it time for both Charlotte and Louis to choose their own futures?

If you ask me, Charlotte and Louis would greatly benefit from having their royal titles stripped, even if it seems like an outlandish step to take. Put simply: it’s time for the monarchy to let their youngest members decide for themselves.

First and foremost, the royal titles are viewed by some as an ancient custom. With the Royal Family having been on the receiving end of plenty of criticism in recent years, dropping the titles would better connect them to the public. Not only that, but wouldn’t it also make them more popular?

“A person of great importance”

If Prince Louis lost all of his titles, he might grow up to be a very important person who builds links between the royalty and regular people, which is very important for the Royal Family’s long-term survival.

Prince Harry chose to go on a unique trip that would take him away from royal life. Some people who know a lot about the royal family have said that Prince Louis might be urged to look for work outside of Buckingham Palace. Still having a royal title will make things a little strange if that turns out to be the case and if Louis himself wants a “normal” life.

There’s no doubt that Prince William and Kate Middleton want the best for their kids. So, I think they could take away both Louis and Charlotte’s royal names right now. They probably won’t, which shows that the royalty is still very far from being modern.