Blog

  • Cruz Beckham, 19, shows off his sweet new ‘mum and dad’ tattoo tribute to his parents Victoria and David

    Cruz Beckham, 19, shows off his sweet new ‘mum and dad’ tattoo tribute to his parents Victoria and David

    Cruz Beckham showed off his sweet new ‘mum and dad’ tattoo tribute to his parents Victoria and David on Monday.

    The 19-year-old took to his social media to share the new inking with his followers after visiting artist Andrew ‘The Kid’ Farnsley.

    The Beckham clan are known for their love of tattoos with footballer David, 49, inspiring his three sons Cruz, Brooklyn, 25, and Romeo, 22, to follow in his footsteps.

    For his new tattoo Cruz opted for a traditional love heart with flower detailing behind it and then the words MUM and DAD printed in capitals.

    Images shared on his social media showed that it was located at the top of his arm.

    He tagged the artist as he shared the new tattoo on his Instagram but didn’t add any other caption.

    Cruz Beckham showed off his sweet new 'mum and dad' tattoo tribute to his parents Victoria and David on Monday
    +11

    Cruz Beckham showed off his sweet new ‘mum and dad’ tattoo tribute to his parents Victoria and David on Monday

    The 19-year-old took to his social media to share the new inking with his followers after visiting artist Andrew 'The Kid' Farnsley
    +11

    The 19-year-old took to his social media to share the new inking with his followers after visiting artist Andrew ‘The Kid’ Farnsley

    The tattoo was a tribute to his parents David and Victoria (seen in October 2023)
    +11

    The tattoo was a tribute to his parents David and Victoria (seen in October 2023)

    Back in February Cruz got another tattoo to match one of his dad David’s inkings to celebrate his 19th birthday.

    The former England footballer’s youngest son’s body art, which is on the left side of his waist, is a portrait of Jesus sitting down and David, 48, has exactly the same tattoo on his right side.

    The Man of Sorrows inking was done by London-based fine line artist Pablo, who is known as @certifiedletterboy on social media.

    Cruz’s new tattoo came as he celebrated his birthday, with David sharing a throwback snap of the pair in tribute.

    ‘Happy Birthday to my little man,’ David captioned the snap of himself holding a young Cruz.

    ‘The cheekiest with the kindest heart keep being you & keep believing in your dream and working as hard as you do. ‘We love you so much Cruzie & are so proud of you.’

    Cruz got his first tattoo aged just 16 while on holiday in Miami. He debuted the inking, a butterfly on his thigh, in an Instagram post which saw him sitting on the edge of a boat and looking out across the sea.

    In the UK, it is against the law for minors to get a tattoo, even with parental consent, but the U.S. state of Florida permits a person under the age of 18 to receive a tattoo with permission of a parent or guardian.

    The Beckhams are known for their huge tattoo collection, with David and Brooklyn wracking up 200 between them.

    For his new tattoo Cruz opted for a traditional love heart with flower detailing behind it and then the words MUM and DAD printed in capitals
    +11

    For his new tattoo Cruz opted for a traditional love heart with flower detailing behind it and then the words MUM and DAD printed in capitals

    Back in February Cruz got another tattoo to match one of his dad David's inkings to celebrate his 19th birthday
    +11

    Back in February Cruz got another tattoo to match one of his dad David’s inkings to celebrate his 19th birthday

    The Man of Sorrows tattoo was done by London-based fine line artist Pablo, who is known as @certifiedletterboy
    +11

    David has exactly the same tattoo except on his right side
    +11

    The Man of Sorrows tattoo (seen left on Cruz and right on David) was done by London-based fine line artist Pablo, who is known as @certifiedletterboy

    Cruz and David are seen together in 2023
    +11

    Cruz and David are seen together in 2023

    Since going under the needle first in 2017, self professed tattoo addict Brooklyn has over amassed 70 tributes to his heiress wife Nicola Peltz alone.

    David, who debuted his first tattoo in 1999, has also paid tribute to mother of his children Victoria, 50, with his own intricately decorated physique.

    The family appear dedicated to paying tribute to one another through inkings, with the three brothers each having the word ‘Brotherhood’ inked on different parts of their body last October.

    The eldest of the three, Brooklyn, opted to have his new tattoo on his leg above his dancing lady body art, while Romeo also had his on his leg above his eagle inking, while Cruz chose to have his on his hand.

    Brooklyn’s tributes to wife Nicola are extensive, with her portrait on his upper arm and her eyes tattooed on the back of his neck as well as her name.

    Cruz Beckham shares a goodbye kiss with girlfriend Jackie Apostel

    Cruz got his first tattoo aged just 16 while on holiday in Miami. He debuted the inking, a butterfly on his thigh, in an Instagram post
    +11

    Cruz got his first tattoo aged just 16 while on holiday in Miami. He debuted the inking, a butterfly on his thigh, in an Instagram post

    The Beckham brothers have marked the strong bond they share as siblings by getting matching tattoos
    +11

    The Beckham brothers have marked the strong bond they share as siblings by getting matching tattoos

    Far from just using her image, Brooklyn also has their wedding vows tattooed on his arm, with the romantic prose reading: ‘Nicola when you walked down the aisle you took my breath away you look so beautiful tonight and always.

    ‘Let me start by saying that words cannot even describe my love for you just looking at you I see my future and it feels like a dream.

    ‘You are my world and I continue to fall more in love with you every single day.’

    The celebrity offspring pays tribute to his family in numerous inkings as well as his billionaire in-laws.

  • Christian Horner forced to deny claims he’s to blame for ‘derailing Spice Girls TV project’ after wife Geri ‘turned down lucrative deal’

    Christian Horner forced to deny claims he’s to blame for ‘derailing Spice Girls TV project’ after wife Geri ‘turned down lucrative deal’

    Christian Horner has been forced to deny claims he’s to blame for ‘derailing Spice Girls TV project’ that would have netted all five members £1million each.

    According to The Sun, Geri, Mel B , Mel CVictoria Beckham and Emma Bunton were all approached about a drama series that came with a seven-figure payday.

    But Geri reportedly turned down the lucrative Spice Girls TV drama deal for the nineties pop group amid rumours she and Christian have been approached to make a ‘really personal’ fly-on-the-wall TV series.

    Dismissing reports of a documentary earlier this year, Christian told the PA news agency: ‘There is a lot being written about different things, but there are absolutely no plans to do a family documentary.

    Netflix do enough, and you see enough of the behind-the-scenes on that. So where that report has come from, I have absolutely no idea.’

    Christian Horner has been forced to deny claims he's to blame for 'derailing Spice Girls TV project' that would have netted all five members £1million each
    +6

    Christian Horner has been forced to deny claims he’s to blame for ‘derailing Spice Girls TV project’ that would have netted all five members £1million each

    According to The Sun, Geri, Mel B , Mel C , Victoria Beckham and Emma Bunton were all approached about a drama series that came with a seven-figure payday
    +6

    According to The Sun, Geri, Mel B , Mel C , Victoria Beckham and Emma Bunton were all approached about a drama series that came with a seven-figure payday

    It comes after reports Geri – who has had a tough six months amid allegations of her Formula One chief husband Christian’s inappropriate behaviour with a female assistant – has been accused of derailing a lucrative Spice Girls deal that would have netted all five members £1million each.

    According to The Sun, Geri, Mel, Mel C, Victoria Beckham and Emma Bunton were all approached about a drama series that came with a seven-figure payday.

    Insiders have claimed talks were going well until Geri decided to back out of her involvement in the project.

    A source said: ‘It would have seen five actresses taking on the roles of Posh, Ginger, Scary, Sporty and Baby.

    ‘The venture would have landed them all pay deals of around £1million for essentially not lifting a finger.

    ‘But as the negotiations ramped up, the others were told Geri had objected. The plans have basically been thrown out.’

    Dismissing reports of a documentary earlier this year, Christian told the PA news agency: 'There is a lot being written about different things, but there are absolutely no plans to do a family documentary'
    +6

    Dismissing reports of a documentary earlier this year, Christian told the PA news agency: ‘There is a lot being written about different things, but there are absolutely no plans to do a family documentary’

    Insiders have claimed talks were going well until Geri decided to back out of her involvement in the project (Spice Girls pictured in 2012)
    +6

    Insiders have claimed talks were going well until Geri decided to back out of her involvement in the project (Spice Girls pictured in 2012)

    The insider added that, without the agreement of Geri, it will be difficult to make the project happen.

    MailOnline has contacted representatives for all five Spice Girls for comment.

    It comes after Geri was also said to have pulled the plug on plans for a new Spice Girls reunion tour – after her feud with Mel B turned increasingly ugly.

    The group had been in discussions about another run of dates and had even made contact with Victoria Beckham about a possible cameo appearance – with the band excited about replicating the success of their last shows.

    But insiders say a bitter rift between the pair – who were once so close they allegedly engaged in a fleeting romance – has now driven a wedge between the group and Geri has now walked away entirely.

    A source told MailOnline: ‘Geri has had enough to deal with after all the drama with her husband’s relationship with his assistant – it has been a tough enough time – and she’s just lost patience with Mel and her little digs and jibes .

    ‘She’s walked away and without Geri it’s really not going to happen – in the past she’s been a driving force in the group, but she doesn’t want to deal with Mel at all at the moment let alone share a stage with her.’

    It's the latest in a slew of rows after their 'frosty' reunion at Victoria Beckham 's 50th birthday bash in April, which many had hoped would trigger a planned reunion
    +6

    It’s the latest in a slew of rows after their ‘frosty’ reunion at Victoria Beckham ‘s 50th birthday bash in April, which many had hoped would trigger a planned reunion

    The Spice Girls reunite at Victoria Beckham’s 50th birthday bash

    Mel made jibes at her former friend by wishing her a ‘Happy 75th Birthday’ online alongside a series of unflattering photographs from their heyday, seemingly a reference to her previous jibes that Geri had lied about her age in the past.

    Insiders say there have been many more digs and jibes behind the scenes which have infuriated Geri – who has had a tough six months amid allegations of her Formula One chief husband Christian Horner ‘s inappropriate behaviour with a female assistant.

    The source added: ‘They’ve always had a tricky relationship but this has got very messy now and nobody has been able to smooth things over between them – so it’s all off again.’

    Mel B’s representative declined to comment.

  • Meghan Markle and the Hysterectomy Rumors: Everything We Know

    Meghan Markle and the Hysterectomy Rumors: Everything We Know

    Meghan Markle and the Hysterectomy Rumors: Everything We Know
    Unpacking the Hysterectomy Rumors Surrounding Meghan Markle

     

    The recent wave of rumors about Meghan Markle allegedly undergoing a hysterectomy has sparked heated debates across social media. From family feuds to speculative YouTube commentary, the story has taken on a life of its own. Here’s a detailed look into the claims, their origins, and the ongoing controversy.

    The hysterectomy rumor primarily stems from a now-deleted video by Thomas Markle Jr., Meghan’s estranged half-brother. In the video, Thomas made bold claims, alleging that Meghan’s first husband, Trevor Engelson, had disclosed the information to him. However, the story quickly unraveled under scrutiny.

    Allegations Against Trevor Engelson: Thomas claimed Trevor had revealed details of Meghan’s alleged hysterectomy. Yet, Trevor has never publicly commented on Meghan, leading many to question the validity of these claims.

    Threats and Inappropriate Content: Thomas allegedly issued threats to a fellow YouTuber and made unsettling remarks about his sister. He even admitted to creating hypersexualized and Photoshopped images of Meghan, claiming his father, Thomas Markle Sr., approved of them.

    Speculation About Legal Repercussions: Some suggest the video was removed due to the risk of legal action, especially from Trevor Engelson, whose alleged involvement in the story seems dubious.

    The Role of Other Commentators

    This isn’t the first time the hysterectomy rumor has surfaced. Another YouTuber had previously discussed it without citing credible sources. Curiously, Thomas Markle Jr. is now reportedly collaborating with this YouTuber on a documentary, which raises questions about their motivations and the timing of the revived narrative.

    Hysterectomies are significant medical procedures and are typically recommended only in cases of severe illness, such as cancer or endometriosis. Doctors usually discourage young women from undergoing this surgery unless absolutely necessary, as it permanently eliminates the possibility of bearing children.

    If Meghan had undergone a hysterectomy, it would likely have been for a serious medical condition. However, there’s no concrete evidence to support this claim, and Meghan herself has not addressed the rumors.

    Trevor Engelson has remained remarkably silent about his past with Meghan. His lack of public commentary has led some to speculate that he signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) after their divorce. NDAs are common in celebrity relationships, often including financial incentives to maintain privacy.

    Given Trevor’s silence, the idea that he shared such personal details with Thomas Markle Jr. seems far-fetched.

    This hysterectomy rumor is just one of many controversies surrounding Meghan Markle. From allegations about her children’s parentage to criticism of her royal exit, public discourse about Meghan often blurs the line between fact and fiction.

    Meghan has often spoken about healing through public conversations and sharing her experiences. Addressing these rumors could provide clarity and potentially help other women facing similar challenges. However, her reluctance to discuss these topics might stem from a desire to maintain privacy or avoid fueling further speculation.

    The truth behind these claims remains elusive. What’s clear is that Meghan continues to be a polarizing figure, with her estranged family members contributing to the controversy. The hysterectomy rumor, whether true or not, highlights the often-invasive scrutiny she endures.

    As with any high-profile figure, it’s crucial to separate fact from speculation and approach such claims critically. Until credible evidence emerges or Meghan herself addresses the topic, the hysterectomy story remains just that—a story.

    The ongoing drama surrounding Meghan Markle shows no signs of slowing down, but the hysterectomy rumors highlight a troubling trend of invasive commentary on women’s bodies and lives. As the public waits for more clarity, it’s a reminder to consume such narratives with caution and empathy.

  • Princess Anne and Kate Middleton’s Reaction to Queen Camilla’s Bold Move: Shocking Details Revealed!

    Princess Anne and Kate Middleton’s Reaction to Queen Camilla’s Bold Move: Shocking Details Revealed!

    Princess Anne and Kate Middleton's Reaction to Queen Camilla’s Bold Move: Shocking Details Revealed!
    An insider source reports that Princess Anne has issued a stern warning to King Charles regarding Queen Camilla’s recent decision about royal tiaras during official engagements. This controversy sheds light on the notable absence of Princess Anne and Princess Catherine from the Diplomatic Corps reception last week.

     

    The British royal family has long fascinated the public with its traditions and complex dynamics. However, recent developments have stirred unrest within the House of Windsor. Queen Camilla’s contentious decision to change tiara regulations has reportedly caused a rift among senior royals.

    Last week, the royal family gathered for the annual Diplomatic Corps reception, an event known for its elegance and tradition. Historically, royal women select tiaras from the Crown Jewels, with their choices often reflecting significant familial and historical ties. However, Queen Camilla introduced a bold new regulation allowing more freedom in tiara selection, granting royal women access to a broader range of options.

    While this move initially received praise from royal watchers eager to see a wider display of the royal collection, insiders claim it has sparked criticism, with some suggesting ulterior motives. Notably, the absence of Princess Anne and Princess Catherine at the event raised eyebrows, hinting at possible tensions surrounding this decision.

    At the Diplomatic Corps event, Queen Camilla wore the aquamarine ribbon tiara, a piece deeply connected to Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh. This tiara, with its ties to the late Queen Elizabeth and Sophie, carries significant historical weight. Queen Camilla’s choice of a deep blue velvet gown further appeared to honor Sophie’s contributions to the royal family, especially during a challenging year that included health struggles for King Charles and Princess Catherine.

    Some analysts interpret Camilla’s tiara choice as a tribute to Sophie, acknowledging her steadfast support. However, this decision has also faced backlash. Insiders reveal that Princess Catherine had planned to wear the iconic Lover’s Knot tiara, famously associated with Princess Diana, but Camilla’s reluctance reportedly led Catherine to skip the event altogether.

    Princess Anne’s absence from the Diplomatic Corps banquet has amplified concerns about internal discord within the royal family. Known for her dedication to tradition, Anne is said to view Camilla’s decision as a deviation from the values upheld by Queen Elizabeth and Princess Diana.

    Anne’s objections extend beyond the tiara regulations. She has reportedly expressed disapproval of Camilla’s decision to adopt the title “Queen” instead of “Queen Consort,” viewing it as a departure from the late Queen Elizabeth’s intentions. Anne’s steadfast belief in preserving tradition underscores her concerns about the monarchy’s stability under Camilla’s influence.

    The tensions between Princess Anne and Queen Camilla are not new. Anne’s discomfort stems from actions she perceives as undermining both tradition and Diana’s legacy. Reports suggest that Camilla’s rumored discouragement of Catherine from wearing tiaras linked to Diana was viewed by Anne as unnecessarily divisive. Anne’s protective stance reflects her understanding of Diana’s lasting impact on the monarchy and the importance of upholding her legacy.

    Princess Catherine’s absence from the reception has also drawn attention. Insiders suggest her decision to skip the event was a quiet protest against Camilla’s new decree. Catherine has consistently honored the legacies of Diana and Queen Elizabeth through her fashion and philanthropic efforts, making her absence a significant statement.

    The Diplomatic Corps controversy highlights the challenges facing the royal family in 2024. With King Charles and Princess Catherine recovering from health issues and ongoing scrutiny of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s activities in the U.S., the monarchy is navigating turbulent waters.

    While Camilla’s efforts to modernize the monarchy aim to reflect contemporary values, they risk alienating those who cherish its traditions. Experts emphasize that the monarchy’s strength lies in balancing heritage with progress. Historian Dr. Emily Carter notes, “The monarchy embodies continuity and stability. Any actions perceived as prioritizing personal ambitions over collective tradition could jeopardize its enduring reputation.”

    The absence of Princess Anne and Princess Catherine from the Diplomatic Corps reception has overshadowed what should have been a unifying event. Queen Camilla’s tiara regulation, though seemingly minor, has sparked a broader debate about the monarchy’s direction. As the House of Windsor faces these challenges, the world watches closely, hoping for a reconciliation between its illustrious past and evolving future.

  • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Silent on Rumored Major Shift

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Silent on Rumored Major Shift

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Silent on Rumored Major Shift
    Prince Harry Vows to Keep Meghan Markle Away from the UK for Her Safety 

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly staying silent about their latest potential plans, with the couple rumored to be “set for change,” according to a royal commentator speaking to *GB News*.

    Speculation first arose in October when reports suggested the Duke and Duchess of Sussex might have purchased a holiday home in Portugal. Observers believe this move could help them maintain a link to the UK while keeping a comfortable distance.

    This decision appears consistent with Harry’s earlier assertion that he would “never” bring Meghan back to the UK due to concerns over her safety.

    The rumored European retreat could also provide an opportunity for their children, Prince Archie, 5, and Princess Lilibet, 3, to spend more time near their royal relatives. It would potentially create a balance between their American lifestyle and ties to Harry’s family.

    The Sussexes have not confirmed or denied the purchase, adding to the intrigue surrounding their alleged plans.

    Meanwhile, Princess Eugenie and her husband, Jack Brooksbank, are already part of the exclusive CostaTerra Golf and Ocean Club community in Portugal. The development, located in Melides, south of Lisbon, is a luxury destination featuring just 300 properties, making it a discreet haven for royals and elites.

    Jack, who works in marketing and sales for the CostaTerra development, and Eugenie split their time between Portugal and London with their sons, August, 3, and Ernest, 17 months.

    Despite the rumors, representatives for Harry and Meghan did not respond to *GB News*’ inquiries about their potential property purchase.

    Royal commentator Gareth Russell speculated that the Sussexes might be deliberately keeping the move under wraps.

    “Portugal may be something they’re planning to keep more private because they have been quite reticent in talking about it at all,” Russell told *GB News*. “Whereas the Montecito purchase was fairly public. But who knows?”

    For now, Harry and Meghan’s reported plans remain a mystery, fueling curiosity about the next chapter in their evolving royal story.

  • Prince William Fires Back: Bold On-Air Defense Highlights Harry and Meghan’s Hypocrisy

    Prince William Fires Back: Bold On-Air Defense Highlights Harry and Meghan’s Hypocrisy

    Prince William Fires Back: Bold On-Air Defense Highlights Harry and Meghan's Hypocrisy
    Prince William Defends Invictus Games, Sparks Feud with Harry and Meghan Over Financial Allegations

     

    A fresh royal controversy is taking center stage as Prince William steps forward to defend the Invictus Games amid allegations of financial misconduct involving Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. In this unfolding drama, accusations of hypocrisy and embezzlement have intensified the already strained relationship between the royal siblings.

    Prince William has made a public stand, accusing Harry and Meghan of misusing funds meant for the Invictus Games, a charity established to honor and support wounded veterans. According to William, the Sussexes are allegedly using donations to bolster their brand rather than the veterans the charity aims to help.

    The elder prince, often seen as composed and diplomatic, has sparked a heated debate. Was his move a calculated effort to address financial transparency, or a strike fueled by personal grievances?

    Founded by Prince Harry in 2014, the Invictus Games have symbolized resilience and the transformative power of sport for wounded service members. However, recent claims suggest some funds may have been diverted toward personal ventures, such as promotional campaigns and projects tied to the Sussexes’ Archewell Foundation.

    Prince William has defended the integrity of the games, emphasizing their mission to support veterans rather than elevate celebrity profiles. His statements have raised pressing questions about financial accountability in charitable organizations.

    The feud between William and Harry has evolved beyond mere sibling disagreements, reflecting deeper ideological divides. While William champions tradition and accountability, Harry has carved a path of independence, often challenging royal conventions.

    Palace insiders suggest that William’s frustrations with Harry have been simmering for years. Private confrontations reportedly went unresolved, prompting William to make his concerns public. Meghan Markle’s role has also come under scrutiny, with critics accusing her of strategically shaping the Sussexes’ media narrative.

    In response, Harry and Meghan have categorically denied the allegations, calling them baseless and defamatory. They highlight the success and impact of the Invictus Games as evidence of their commitment.

    Supporters of the Sussexes argue that these claims are part of a smear campaign orchestrated by the monarchy to undermine their growing influence. Skeptics, however, remain doubtful, citing the couple’s history of controlling their public image.

    The real victims of this controversy are the veterans who depend on the Invictus Games. If funds were indeed mismanaged, what does this mean for the event’s future? The scandal underscores the need for greater transparency and independent audits to safeguard the charity’s mission.

    This dispute is more than a family matter—it could have lasting consequences for the monarchy’s image. Public trust in the royal family has already been strained by a series of controversies. For Prince William, this is an opportunity to position himself as a modern, principled leader, but it risks deepening divisions within his family.

    Harry and Meghan, meanwhile, face the challenge of proving their integrity. As champions of social causes, these allegations could significantly impact their reputation and philanthropic efforts.

    This scandal offers an opportunity for the royal family to demonstrate accountability and adaptability in the face of public scrutiny. Increased oversight of royal charities, a commitment to financial transparency, and a new approach to handling conflicts could help rebuild trust.

    The ongoing feud between William and Harry raises the question: can they reconcile? A public gesture of forgiveness or collaboration could restore familial unity and strengthen their shared causes. History shows that royal disputes can heal, but whether this one will remains uncertain.

    This controversy is more than just another royal headline—it’s a moment of reckoning. How the parties involved respond will shape their legacies and the public’s perception of the monarchy.

    What do you think about the allegations against Harry and Meghan? Are William’s actions a display of leadership or a betrayal? Should the Invictus Games undergo an independent audit to restore confidence? Share your thoughts and join the conversation. Together, let’s explore how this moment of tension can lead to positive change.

  • Ellen was saving up for a new home but, on a whim, spent £120,000 on five of Diana’s dresses instead. Weeks later the Princess tragically died – and she began her incredible mission…

    Ellen was saving up for a new home but, on a whim, spent £120,000 on five of Diana’s dresses instead. Weeks later the Princess tragically died – and she began her incredible mission…

    A hot evening in a packed auction room at Christie’s in New York in June 1997, and the atmosphere had reached fever pitch as some of Princess Diana’s most iconic dresses went under the hammer.

    As the black velvet Victor Edelstein gown Diana wore to the White House in 1985 — famous as the occasion she danced with John Travolta — was bought for six figures, and gowns like the pearl-encrusted Catherine Walker ‘Elvis’ dress were snapped up, it was clear that this was a charity auction like no other.

    Among the bidders was Ellen Petho, a mother and grandmother, who had snagged a coveted ticket. Mesmerised, she sat on the edge of her seat as a scarlet metallic jacquard chiffon gown, designed by Bruce Oldfield and worn by the Princess of Wales several times, reached the auction block.

    ‘Somebody in the entertainment industry was also interested in the dress and Ellen was determined not to be outbid,’ Ellen’s husband Louis tells me today. ‘There was a battle, but Ellen was fearless and kept going till the dress was hers.’

    At the auction’s end, the self-made businesswoman — who, ironically, often shopped for herself at discount clothing stores — was the proud owner of five of Diana’s outfits. In total, they’d cost her $150,000 (£120,000) — money which the astute Ellen had saved to spend on a property.

    On Friday, three of the dresses she bought (two were sold a few years ago) will again be available to buy at auction — this time at Julien’s Auctions in Beverly Hills, California, after Ellen died in January, aged 82.

    Dazzling: Princess Diana in the iconic Bruce Oldfield gown
    +5

    Ellen Petho with the dress
    +5

    ESTIMATED AUCTION PRICE $200,000 to $400,000: Princess Diana in the iconic Bruce Oldfield gown and (right) Ellen Petho with the dress

    The memory of the evening she bought them is still fresh in her husband’s memory. Incredibly, Ellen had not told Louis that she was bidding for the gowns.

    ‘It was late at night when she called me and said, “Hey, let me tell you what I just did”,’ laughs Louis, of his wife’s purchases.

    ‘I was surprised, but Ellen always had good reasons for doing the things she did, so I trusted she knew what she was doing.

    ‘She didn’t want to go on with the advertising business she founded, and she knew about Diana’s passion for helping children. She bought the dresses to continue that legacy — and, of course, it turned out to be a wonderful thing.’

    It certainly did. For rather than just wheeling them out to show off at swanky dinner parties, Ellen and her husband spent the next ten years travelling the length and breadth of the U.S. with the royal gowns, collecting more than a million pounds for causes close to Diana’s heart, including special needs and Aids charities.

    In the process, the couple had experiences they could only have dreamed of, including becoming good friends with David Emanuel, who co-designed Diana’s wedding dress, and meeting two of Diana’s favourite couturiers, Bruce Oldfield and Catherine Walker.

    Perhaps their biggest adventure of all was being invited to afternoon tea with Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, at Althorp in 2007. ‘Never,’ says Louis, ‘did we imagine meeting Diana’s brother. But we did, and he was very nice.’

    Such was her devoted reverence of the dresses, Ellen never touched them without gloves, even building a special temperature-controlled vault at her home in which to store them.

    On sale this week will be a Catherine Walker bi-colour gown worn by Princess Diana for a gala dinner in 1991 in Toronto, Canada, which has a sales estimate of $100,000 to $200,000 (£79,000-£159,000), while another Catherine Walker dress, an ivory and black number worn to a private function, has a sales estimate of $60,000 to $80,000 (£48,000-£63,000).

    Stylish: Diana in the Catherine Walker gown arriving at the Royal York Hotel in Toronto
    +5

    The Catherine Walker gown
    +5

    ESTIMATED AUCTION PRICE: $100,000 to $200,000: Diana in the Catherine Walker gown arriving at the Royal York Hotel in Toronto

    Not forgetting that Bruce Oldfield scarlet gown which so captivated Ellen all those years ago and which the Princess wore on several occasions, including to the London premiere of the film Hot Shots in 1991, and which has a sales estimate of $200,000 to $400,000 (£159,000-£318,000).

    Martin Nolan, executive director of Julien’s Auctions, says these are ‘conservative estimates’ and they may go for more. ‘Many people can remember seeing Diana in some of these dresses,’ he says. ‘They’re beautiful creations and works of art, but more than anything they’re a connection to Diana, whose life was cut short and who is still missed.’

    More than anything, Ellen’s family hopes the purchaser will see the dresses as Ellen did: as vehicles for good deeds.

    Certainly, one can’t help but contrast Ellen’s philanthropic use of the dresses to the fate of another iconic gown: that of Marilyn Monroe’s ‘Happy Birthday Mr President’ performance — the most expensive dress ever sold at auction after it went for $4.81 million — and which was, controversially, worn by Kim Kardashian to the Met Gala in 2022.

    Martin Nolan, who also oversaw the auction of that Monroe dress in 2016, says: ‘When Ellen bought these dresses, she had no idea that Diana would be gone so soon — but she resolved after her death that they were going to mean something, and she made that happen.’

    Ellen’s remarkable involvement with Diana’s dresses came about by accident. She and Louis, who met as teenage sweethearts and were married for 60 years, raised their three daughters, Karrie, Christine and Katherine, in Michigan.

    Ellen, a stay-at-home mother, went back to college as a mature student in 1988, earning a degree in advertising and design before setting up her own interior design business and an advertising company.

    Ellen and her daughters were fans of the princess, but it was her youngest daughter, Katherine, then 12, who was most captivated when Charles and Diana announced their engagement.

    Over the years, mother and daughter collected royal memorabilia as they followed the twists and turns of Diana’s life. When the sale of 79 of Diana’s dresses was announced some 26 years ago, Ellen purchased a $250 catalogue from Christie’s as a gift for Katherine to ‘round off her collection’ and was delighted to find two tickets for the preview of the auction inside the book.

    ESTIMATED AUCTION PRICE $60,000 to $80,000: Catherine Walker dress worn to a private function
    +5

    ESTIMATED AUCTION PRICE $60,000 to $80,000: Catherine Walker dress worn to a private function

    But Katherine, then a 28-year-old teacher, could not get time off work so Ellen took a friend to the preview. Ellen was thrilled to discover she was one of only 600 permitted to attend the auction — and began to form a plan to use $150,000 she’d saved for as many of Diana’s dresses as possible, instead of the property investment she initially intended.

    ‘When our mother received the catalogue, she’d read the inscription inside about Prince William telling his mother that the dresses shouldn’t sit in her closet; that they should be out in the world and doing good things for different communities,’ says Ellen’s eldest daughter Karrie, now aged 60. ‘I think that’s what inspired her.’

    Karrie and her two sisters speak to me by telephone from Karrie’s kitchen, near the town where they grew up. Were they surprised when their mother told them what she had done? ‘Yes!’ they exclaim. ‘Our mother was an adventurer,’ Christine adds fondly.

    Two months after the sale, the terrible news of Diana’s death in a car crash stunned the world, including the Petho family. ‘She was dumbstruck when Diana died; devastated — like everyone,’ says Karrie. ‘I think it made it even more important that she do this work and raise money for causes Diana supported.’

    Ellen had mannequins made for the five dresses, as well as custom-designed linen carrying bags, each embroidered with a red rose, one of Diana’s favourite flowers.

    Surely she must have been tempted to try them on? ‘She never tried them on — it would have destroyed the magic,’ says Louis. ‘She treated them with reverence.’

    Ellen’s daughters never asked to try them on. ‘Our mother felt she was the guardian of these dresses, and we respected that,’ agrees Karrie. Instead, Ellen displayed the dresses at charity events across the U.S. ‘I often saw people come to the exhibits and they’d start crying. It was the emotion of losing Diana and the memories,’ her husband says.

    Ellen answered many calls from charities. ‘She once got a call from a lady in Florida who had a mobile dental surgery on a converted bus that would go into poor neighbourhoods and treat kids whose parents didn’t have money for dental appointments,’ says Louis.

    ‘She asked if Ellen could help raise money to keep the service going, and Ellen found a venue, shipped the dresses, went off to Florida and raised $30,000 over a couple of days, all because people loved to see those dresses,’ says Louis. ‘She also raised a lot of money for camps that hosted children with Aids, because she knew that had been a cause close to Diana’s heart.’

    Ellen and her husband made multiple trips to London, meeting some of the designers who made clothes for Diana. ‘David Emanuel became a close friend of ours and Bruce Oldfield was extremely gracious when he found out that Ellen owned the red dress,’ recalls Louis, 83.

    ‘We went to Catherine Walker’s studio. She was ill at the time [French-born designer Catherine Walker, who worked with Diana for 16 years, died of cancer in 2010] and we were having a very nice conversation with her husband when she walked in.

    ‘She told us one of the dresses, an ivory and white one, was made for a private function, probably dinner in someone’s house, and that’s why there are no official photographs of Diana wearing it.’

    Diana’s brother Charles Spencer invited the couple to his home. ‘We had a tour of the house and gardens, then we were taken to Earl Spencer’s study where he was waiting and had tea laid on,’ says Louis.

    Ellen continued her charitable work till her health deteriorated due to congestive heart failure. The family plans to use some of the money from the sale of the dresses to establish an art and design scholarship for mature students.

    Interest in the items is intense because Diana’s dresses come on the market so rarely, according to auctioneer Martin Nolan, who has managed sales of many notable collections, including the property of Muhammad Ali, Michael Jackson and Elvis Presley, among others. Mr Nolan says: ‘Here in California, there’s someone who lives not far from the auction house who is very interested. It’s going to be an exciting sale.’

  • Duchess Meghan Criticized: Advocates Family Unity Amid Strained Ties with Bedridden Father

    Duchess Meghan Criticized: Advocates Family Unity Amid Strained Ties with Bedridden Father

    Duchess Meghan Criticized: Advocates Family Unity Amid Strained Ties with Bedridden Father
    Recently, Meghan Markle gave an interview with Marie Claire where she shared insights into her family’s holiday traditions. She spoke warmly about the importance of family, the joy of creating memories, and the value of opening your home to those without family. However, there’s a glaring contradiction here: Meghan has completely cut ties with her own father, Thomas Markle, and has been instrumental in estranging Prince Harry from his family.

     

    The hypocrisy is staggering. How can someone who has severed so many familial bonds preach about family values? While Meghan gushes about having her mother, Doria Ragland, nearby in California, her father, who helped raise her and supported her acting career, is bedridden and estranged.

    Let’s take a closer look at Thomas Markle’s situation. He was once a doting father who helped Meghan attend private school and funded her early career. The worst thing he’s accused of is selling stories to the press—a far cry from the millions Meghan and Harry have earned airing royal family grievances to Netflix and Oprah. Despite his health struggles, Meghan has shown no interest in reconciliation, not even letting him meet his grandchildren, Archie and Lilibet.

    During her wedding preparations, instead of personally checking on her father after his heart attack, Meghan sent texts. Contrast this with King Charles, who graciously stepped in to walk Meghan down the aisle. Yet, she has repaid him by keeping his grandchildren away.

    Meghan proudly shares her curated holiday traditions, from leaving carrots for reindeer to creating picture-perfect family moments. But these celebrations exclude an entire side of her children’s family. Archie and Lilibet are growing up without knowing their cousins—Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis—or their grandparents, King Charles and Thomas Markle.

    Prince Harry, once the beloved uncle who brought laughter to family gatherings, is now distant. He spends his time in California making documentaries and playing polo while his nieces and nephews grow up without him.

    Every public statement from Meghan seems meticulously planned to craft an idealized version of her life in California. Whether it’s name-dropping Gloria Steinem or highlighting charitable projects like Archewell, it’s all about maintaining an image. But the actions don’t align with the values she promotes. She preaches compassion and inclusion while isolating her children from their heritage.

    The saddest part of this story isn’t just the fractured family relationships—it’s the children who are missing out. Archie and Lilibet are being denied the chance to know their cousins, their grandparents, and the traditions of both sides of their family. Someday, they will ask questions. They’ll want to know why they were kept from their extended family. What will Meghan and Harry say then?

    While Meghan talks about family values, Catherine, Princess of Wales, lives them. She’s raising her children to understand their roles, teaching them the importance of duty and service. Despite public criticism, Catherine maintains grace and dignity, showing her children what it truly means to be part of a family.

    This latest interview highlights the stark contrast between Meghan’s words and actions. Preaching about family values while actively severing ties is the height of hypocrisy. But the truth has a way of coming to light. One day, all the carefully crafted interviews and Instagram-worthy narratives won’t matter. The real story will emerge, and those who have been kept apart will have their say.

  • A Royal Drama: Princess Anne’s Candid Take on Meghan Markle

    A Royal Drama: Princess Anne’s Candid Take on Meghan Markle

    In the latest twist in the ongoing saga of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, Princess Anne has reportedly shared her unfiltered thoughts on the Duchess of Sussex, revealing a rift that highlights the stark differences between royal expectations and Hollywood glamor.

    The revelations have sent shockwaves through the media and royal circles alike, as insiders spill the tea on what went down behind palace walls.

    Picture this: a typical day at Buckingham Palace where the corgis are frolicking about, and Prince Charles is deep in conversation with his plants.

    Amidst this serene chaos, Princess Anne dropped a bombshell that could rival any royal scandal.

    Known for her no-nonsense attitude and tireless work ethic, Anne isn’t your average royal.

    She’s the unsung hero of the royal family, getting things done without the fanfare.

    According to royal insider Neil Seen, Princess Anne was skeptical of Meghan from the very beginning.

    She seemed to sense that Meghan might struggle to adapt to the rigorous demands of royal life.

    With a candidness that’s rare in royal circles, Anne allegedly told Meghan, “This isn’t Hollywood.” Her advice?

    Embrace the responsibilities that come with being a member of the royal family instead of treating it like a glamorous role in a film.

    Now, can you imagine Meghan’s reaction during this pep talk?

    It must have been a mix of confusion and disbelief, as she likely envisioned herself stepping into a fairytale.

    However, Anne was there to remind her that royal duties require dedication and hard work—qualities that Meghan may not have fully grasped.

    It’s almost as if Meghan thought her royal role would be more about looking good than doing good.

    The contrast between Meghan’s approach and Anne’s commitment couldn’t be starker.

    While Anne has been a steadfast presence at countless royal engagements, Meghan seemed to take a more laid-back approach.

    For instance, when she was appointed patron of the National Theater, insiders claim she didn’t dive in as expected.

    It’s akin to receiving keys to a chocolate factory and only nibbling on the wrappers.

    As Princess Anne continues to fulfill her royal obligations with vigor, Meghan appears to be navigating a different path altogether.

    This clash of cultures—between the traditional, duty-bound approach of the royals and the more image-focused mentality of Hollywood—has created an environment rife with tension.

    Harry finds himself caught in the middle, trying to balance his family’s centuries-old traditions with his wife’s desire for a modern lifestyle.

    The drama is unfolding like a slow-motion train wreck, but with a regal twist.

    Meghan and Harry’s departure from the UK was framed as a quest for privacy and a normal life for their children.

    Ironically, they’ve become some of the most talked-about figures in the world, sharing their story through interviews, books, and documentaries.

    The royal family must feel like they’re living in a reality show gone awry.

    Princess Anne’s recent comments about Meghan’s short-lived tenure in the monarchy have added fuel to the fire.

    Her remarks were sharp, suggesting that Meghan’s chances of thriving in royal life were as slim as keeping a chocolate teapot intact.

    While some may view this as harsh, it rings true given the circumstances.

    What’s particularly frustrating is that Meghan had a golden opportunity to learn from someone like Princess Anne, who has navigated royal life for decades.

    Had she embraced Anne’s wisdom and work ethic, the monarchy could have seen a refreshing collaboration between the experienced royal and the new face.

    Instead, we’re left with a narrative filled with more drama than a Shakespeare festival.

    As for Harry, he’s transformed from the cheeky prince into someone who seems increasingly reluctant to discuss his family.

    It’s a far cry from the beloved royal persona he once embodied.

    The family drama is now reminiscent of a soap opera, with the stakes raised higher than ever.

    Let’s not forget the Queen, who has had to endure more family turmoil than most people encounter in a lifetime.

    At 90, she deserves peace, yet she finds herself in the midst of a royal soap opera that rivals anything on television.

    King Charles now faces the challenge of steering the family through these troubled waters, all while trying to maintain the monarchy’s dignity.

    Amid all this chaos, Princess Anne emerges as a steadfast figure.

    While others flounder, she remains committed to her royal duties, embodying the essence of what it means to be a member of the royal family.

    Her example serves as a reminder that when given the chance to learn from those who have come before you, it’s wise to listen.

    In this royal tale of contrasting values, the moral is clear: when a seasoned royal offers guidance, it’s best to heed it.

    The world of royalty is not just about glitz and glamour; it requires hard work and dedication.

    As this saga continues to unfold, one can only wonder what the next chapter will hold for the royal family.

  • Victoria Beckham can’t resist taking a snap of shirtless husband David showing off his ripped abs as he works out in their luxury home gym

    Victoria Beckham can’t resist taking a snap of shirtless husband David showing off his ripped abs as he works out in their luxury home gym

    David Beckham showed off his incredibly toned physique on Instagram as he worked out shirtless in his lavish home gym on Monday morning.

    The former England footballer, 49, showcased his strength while working on his upper body by performing pull downs.

    David sported a pair of dark sports shorts with a pair of long white socks and trainers as he showed off his tattoos while going shirtless for the gruelling workout.

    The athlete revealed that he hit the gym with his fashion mogul wife Victoria who snapped the picture while he was on the machine.

    He wrote: ‘Good morning workout with my wife & her [camera emoji] @victoriabeckham’.

    David Beckham showed off his incredibly toned physique on Instagram as he worked out shirtless in his lavish home gym on Monday morning
    +6

    David Beckham showed off his incredibly toned physique on Instagram as he worked out shirtless in his lavish home gym on Monday morning

    The former England footballer, 49, revealed his fashion mogul wife Victoria, 50, had snapped the picture of him while he worked on his upper body

    The former England footballer, 49, revealed his fashion mogul wife Victoria, 50, had snapped the picture of him while he worked on his upper body

    Victoria is also a fan of a morning workout and often snaps selfies in their home gym
    +6

    Victoria is also a fan of a morning workout and often snaps selfies in their home gym

    Taking to his Instagram Story, David was seen mixing a wellness all-in-one supplement drink from his new brand IM8 following his workout.

    Pulling on a white T-shirt and orange winter hat, the star added his açaí and mixed berries powder to a glass of water and mixed it up before drinking it.

    The all-in-one powder Daily Ultimate Essentials claims to replace the need for 16 daily supplements with its 92 nutrient-rich ingredients.

    The brand IM8, owned by the former footballer, say the £65 product also boosts energy and digestion, as well as giving hair, skin and nails a glow up.

    Its Daily Ultimate Longevity capsule — setting you back £61 — is also designed to ‘support healthy ageing’.

    But experts have since labelled the products ‘yet another celebrity endorsed supplement’ and said the brand makes ‘questionable claims’ based purely on ‘limited information from poorly conducted studies’.

    Taken in excess, it is ‘unlikely to be harmful’, they cautioned.

    However, the quantities of ingredients used in both products are not listed, putting some allergy sufferers at risk, they added, with the benefits of some ingredients even counteracting each other.

    Taking to his Instagram Story, David was seen mixing a wellness all-in-one supplement drink from his new brand IM8 following his workout
    +6

    Pulling on a white T-shirt and orange winter hat, the star added his açaí and mixed berries powder to a glass of water and mixed it up before drinking it
    +6

    Taking to his Instagram Story, David was seen mixing a wellness all-in-one supplement drink from his new brand IM8 following his workout

    Buying the two products together, dubbed The Beckham Stack will cost you a thrifty £100.

    Among the 92 ingredients in Daily Ultimate Essentials is acai and mixed berry powder which includes a blend of pre, pro, and postbiotics for gut health, as well as vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, superfoods, greens, and adaptogens — herbs believed to help stress levels.

    The second product designed to boost longevity contains a ‘powerful formula’ of ingredients that target ‘the 11 hallmarks of aging’ and ‘enhance cellular health’.

    This includes copper to aid ‘blood vessel health, immune function and iron absorption’ and popular supplement vitamin B12 to help ‘energy production and cognitive function’.

    It comes after David showed off his hunky physique as he posed shirtless for a snap in the sauna which he shared to Instagram on Friday afternoon.

    The football legend treated himself to a pampering session and took to his Instagram page sharing the shot, captioning: ‘Friday reset.’

    The president of Inter Miami CF proved he hasn’t aged a day, displaying his fit figure in white boxers and a towel around his neck.

    His Instagram post was not dissimilar to a recent Instagram snap of his son Romeo, 22, who posed shirtless for a series of snaps during a getaway with friends.

    The model was the spitting image of his famous dad as he showed off his array of tattoos while enjoying an outdoor hot tub with pal Mitchell Curry.

    It comes after David showed off his ageless physique as he posed shirtless for a snap in the sauna on Friday
    +6

    It comes after David showed off his ageless physique as he posed shirtless for a snap in the sauna on Friday

    David's Instagram post was not dissimilar to a recent Instagram snap of his son Romeo, 22, who posed shirtless for a series of snaps during a getaway with friends
    +6

    David’s Instagram post was not dissimilar to a recent Instagram snap of his son Romeo, 22, who posed shirtless for a series of snaps during a getaway with friends