Blog

Host Howie Mandel Doesn’t Remember Meghan Markle on ‘Deal or No Deal,’ Describes Her as “Dull and Mean”

In the ongoing discussions surrounding Meghan Markle’s time as a “briefcase girl” on the popular game show “Deal or No Deal,” host Howie Mandel recently shared his perspective, stating that he does not remember Markle and recalling her as “dull and mean” to everyone.

Mandel’s comments come amid renewed attention to Markle’s stint on the show, sparked by her own remarks about feeling objectified and reduced to her looks during her tenure. Markle, who appeared on “Deal or No Deal” from 2006 to 2007, described her experience as making her feel like a “bimbo,” which has drawn mixed reactions from the public and her former colleagues.

In an interview, Mandel expressed surprise at the attention given to Markle’s time on the show. “I don’t remember her,” he stated plainly. “She was one of many ‘briefcase girls,’ and there wasn’t anything particularly memorable about her performance or demeanor.”

Mandel went further, describing Markle’s behavior on set as “dull and mean.” He noted that while the atmosphere on the show was generally positive and supportive, Markle’s interactions with others stood out negatively. “She wasn’t engaging or friendly with the rest of the cast and crew,” Mandel recalled. “Her attitude was quite off-putting.”

These revelations from Mandel offer a stark contrast to the image Markle has since cultivated as a compassionate and socially conscious public figure. Mandel’s depiction of her as unremarkable and unfriendly adds another layer to the complex narrative surrounding Markle’s early career in entertainment.

The contrast between Markle’s current public persona and Mandel’s recollections raises questions about the evolution of her character and public image. While it is not uncommon for individuals to grow and change over time, the disparity in accounts highlights the multifaceted nature of public figures and the challenges in reconciling different aspects of their past and present selves.

As Markle continues to navigate her post-royal career, these differing perspectives from her past associates provide a broader context for understanding her journey. Mandel’s comments serve as a reminder of the diverse and sometimes contradictory experiences and perceptions that can shape an individual’s public and private life.

The third day of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s much-publicized tour of Colombia was intended to showcase the rich culture of the Afro-Caribbean village of San Basilio de Palenque.

However, it quickly devolved into another chapter of the couple’s ongoing public drama. This time, Harry appeared particularly frustrated with Meghan’s notorious grip, which she uses to navigate their public appearances.

Their journey to the village was nothing short of an ordeal, involving a 30-minute helicopter ride from Cartagena followed by a bumpy, 15-minute drive along a pothole-ridden road, guarded by soldiers and even a tank.

eghan was dressed for the occasion in a white linen skirt, a sleeveless blouse, and a Panama hat, ideal for the sweltering 30°C heat. Harry, in contrast, seemed to struggle with the climate, his light blue linen shirt showing conspicuous sweat stains.

Upon arriving at the village square, where local artisans displayed traditional crafts, Meghan immediately seized Harry’s hand. However, this was no tender gesture of affection.

Meghan’s grip was firm and purposeful, as though she was dragging him along, directing his every move. The forcefulness of her grip made it almost seem as if Harry were incapable of moving without her guidance.

The tension was evident; Meghan’s determination to keep Harry exactly where she wanted him contrasted sharply with his evident discomfort. He looked disinterested and weary, his attempts to subtly pull away from her grasp noticeable despite his efforts to maintain a polite demeanor.

The disparity between Meghan’s forced smiles and Harry’s clear detachment was striking. Meghan, with her determined hand-holding, appeared desperate to project an image of a content couple, while Harry looked increasingly resigned.

The situation seemed absurd. Here they were, on a cultural tour, yet the attention was fixated on the peculiar dynamics of their relationship. Meghan’s clinginess and Harry’s apparent aversion highlighted the underlying strain between them. Their hand-holding, far from being a symbol of affection, seemed more like a power struggle.

As the day progressed, it became increasingly clear that the hand-holding was less about showing love and more about exerting control. Meghan’s efforts to maintain appearances only underscored the tensions in their relationship, while Harry’s attempts to distance himself spoke volumes.

The carefully curated image of a loving, united couple was visibly unraveling. The Colombian tour, meant to be a cultural exchange, instead turned into a showcase of a relationship facing significant challenges.

In recent developments, Meghan Markle has raised concerns about her children, Archie and Lilibet, receiving their rightful royal titles. After stepping down from senior royal duties in 2020, Meghan and Prince Harry have been vocal about their desire for their children to be treated fairly within the royal institution. Meghan emphasized that despite their distance from royal life, her family has worked to uphold the image of the Royal Family internationally, notably in North America, and believes her children deserve official recognition for their heritage.

Meghan’s argument stems from a belief that Archie and Lilibet, as grandchildren of King Charles III, are entitled to royal titles under the 1917 Letters Patent. This law stipulates that children of the sovereign’s sons should receive the titles of prince and princess. However, there has been considerable debate within the Royal Family regarding the allocation of these titles, especially since Harry and Meghan have taken a step back from their official duties.

The question of royal titles became particularly significant following Queen Elizabeth II’s passing in 2022. With King Charles III ascending the throne, the children now stand closer in line to the succession, further igniting discussions about whether they should automatically receive the titles of prince and princess. Initially, Archie and Lilibet were referred to as “Master” and “Miss,” titles reflecting their parents’ reduced status within the royal hierarchy. Still, Meghan has argued that her children have contributed to bringing the Royal Family’s influence to new territories and should be honored with their rightful titles.

Security is another key issue tied to the royal titles. Meghan and Harry have consistently expressed concerns for their children’s safety, particularly during their visits to the UK. Royal titles would grant them HRH (His or Her Royal Highness) status, which comes with taxpayer-funded security. Without these titles, the Sussex family has faced challenges in securing adequate protection for their children, prompting Harry to take legal action against the British government to obtain personal security at his own expense.

While King Charles III has not publicly commented on this matter, experts suggest that he is considering the implications of conferring these titles on his grandchildren. Many observers speculate that the monarch is balancing tradition with the evolving nature of the monarchy, particularly as Harry and Meghan’s roles remain unconventional compared to other senior royals like Prince William and Kate Middleton. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s choice to seek a life independent of royal duties, while still maintaining their royal lineage, complicates the decision.

Public opinion on this issue remains divided. Some people support Meghan’s demand for titles, seeing it as a matter of fairness and security for the family. Others argue that Harry and Meghan, having voluntarily stepped back from royal duties and established lucrative independent careers, should not expect royal titles or privileges for their children. These critics often cite that taxpayer funds should not be allocated to provide security for non-working royals.

Ultimately, the decision rests with King Charles III, and it remains unclear how this situation will unfold. As Meghan and Harry continue their journey outside of traditional royal roles, their children’s potential royal titles remain a symbol of the evolving dynamics within the British monarchy. This ongoing debate highlights the tension between maintaining royal traditions and adapting to modern circumstances.

Piers Morgan, known as the “arch-enemy” of Meghan Markle, has never shied away from criticizing and mocking the Duchess in the media. Following the Sussexes’ explosive interview with Oprah, Piers Morgan delivered a biting response to the couple’s accusations against the royal family on his show.

Piers Morgan did not hold back in his rebuke of Meghan, stating, “I don’t believe a word she says. I wouldn’t believe a weather report if she was reading it. Her fierce attacks on our Royal Family are utterly disgraceful.”

Piers Morgan’s harsh criticism of Meghan Markle.

The veteran journalist’s on-air assault on Meghan sparked a flurry of complaints to Ofcom, the government agency that oversees communications, including a formal complaint from Meghan herself. Many demanded that Piers Morgan apologize to Meghan, but he flatly refused and instead chose to resign from his position.

Now, Piers Morgan is seen as having “won” the “battle” with Meghan, as he has been found not to have done anything wrong. Ofcom recently declared that Morgan did not violate any media regulations or principles when he openly labeled Meghan a liar on Good Morning Britain (GMB) last March.

Ofcom stated, “Mr. Morgan was entitled to say he disbelieved the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s allegations and to hold and express strong views that robustly challenged their account.”

Meghan Markle faces another bitter outcome.

Following Ofcom’s conclusion, Piers Morgan jubilantly took to Twitter, calling it a “resounding defeat for Princess Pinocchio,” reiterating that many of Harry and Meghan’s claims have been proven false. The term “Princess Pinocchio” (implying that Meghan is a lying princess) has since become a new nickname used by internet users to mock the Duchess.

Many online users remarked that this is undoubtedly a severe blow to the Sussexes, as their fabrications from the explosive interview are once again being scrutinized. As of now, the Sussexes have not issued any response to this latest development.

The British royal family has always been a focal point of media and public attention, and the recent interaction between Prince Harry and Prince William concerning Taylor Swift’s London Eras tour has only added to the drama. The incident, involving Prince Harry’s criticism of his brother for allegedly dancing at the concert, has led to a wave of disappointment among fans and further highlighted the ongoing tension between the two royal siblings.

The controversy began when reports surfaced that Prince Harry had criticized Prince William for his enthusiastic participation at Taylor Swift’s London Eras tour. According to sources, Harry found his brother’s public display of enjoyment unbecoming of a royal. This critique did not sit well with the public, especially among fans of both the royal family and Taylor Swift. Many felt that Prince Harry’s remarks were unwarranted and that Prince William should be allowed to enjoy himself without judgment.

The public reaction was swift and largely in support of Prince William. Fans took to social media to express their disappointment in Prince Harry’s comments. Many argued that attending a concert and dancing should be seen as a normal, relatable activity, even for royals. Prince William’s actions were seen as a positive, humanizing moment that showed a more personal side of him. Fans celebrated his willingness to let loose and enjoy the music, emphasizing that such moments are what endear public figures to the masses.

This incident comes at a time when the relationship between Prince Harry and Prince William is already under intense scrutiny. The brothers, once known for their close bond, have been drifting apart in recent years, with various public and private disagreements making headlines. The rift became more pronounced following Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to step back from royal duties and their subsequent interviews, where they spoke candidly about their experiences within the royal family.

The critique over a concert dance might seem trivial, but it underscores the deeper issues at play. Every action and reaction between the brothers is magnified and dissected, often leading to further speculation about their relationship. In this case, Prince Harry’s criticism and the subsequent fan backlash add another layer to the complex dynamics within the royal family.

The media has eagerly followed this latest development, with numerous outlets reporting on the incident and the public’s reaction. Articles in prominent publications like People and Express detail the events and provide context to the ongoing saga between the two princes. This level of interest is indicative of the public’s fascination with the royal family and the personalities within it. Every new piece of information is analyzed, contributing to the broader narrative of royal life and the personal challenges they face.

The recent controversy involving Prince Harry’s criticism of Prince William’s dancing at Taylor Swift’s London Eras tour is more than just a moment of royal gossip. It highlights the ongoing tension between the brothers and reflects the public’s desire to see their favorite royals as relatable, genuine individuals. While fans were disappointed by Prince Harry’s comments, the incident has also shown widespread support for Prince William and his right to enjoy himself. As the story continues to unfold, it remains a poignant example of how personal dynamics within the royal family can captivate and divide public opinion.

Netflix recently shut down all projects related to Prince Harry following allegations of his cruelty towards horses during polo matches. The streaming platform had initially planned a documentary series centered on the world of professional polo, with Harry playing a significant role. However, after unsettling reports surfaced involving mistreatment of animals, Netflix decided to cancel the series and other collaborations with the Duke of Sussex. This turn of events marks another setback in Prince Harry’s public endeavors, already strained by previous controversies surrounding his media ventures​.

Despite earlier excitement surrounding Harry’s polo documentary, which was set to explore the sport’s behind-the-scenes dynamics, Netflix quickly distanced itself after evidence of misconduct emerged. The platform confirmed that production was halted indefinitely, underscoring the seriousness of the accusations. Prior to the allegations, the series had been expected to premiere later this year, as Harry and his wife Meghan Markle continued seeking media success after their highly-publicized departure from royal duties​.

This abrupt cancellation is another instance of Harry’s struggles to secure a steady presence in the entertainment world. The couple’s Netflix deal, which once seemed promising with various projects in development, now faces a bleak future as their ventures continue to encounter setbacks. With these developments, it remains to be seen whether Prince Harry and Meghan will be able to repair their media image and find new opportunities in the entertainment industry amidst growing scrutiny.

In a shocking turn of events, Prince Harry has reportedly caught Meghan Markle in a compromising situation, fueling rumors and speculation across the globe. According to sources close to the royal couple, Harry, suspicious of Meghan’s recent behavior, decided to take matters into his own hands by secretly installing cameras throughout their home. What he allegedly uncovered was beyond what anyone could have imagined: Meghan was reportedly caught on camera with another man, sparking a scandal that threatens to shake the very foundation of their relationship.

The leaked footage, which has since gone viral, shows Meghan in a private and intimate setting with a man who is not her husband. This revelation has sent shockwaves through the media and among the public, who have closely followed Harry and Meghan’s journey ever since they stepped away from their royal duties. The couple, who have been vocal about their desire for privacy and independence, now find themselves at the center of a media firestorm, with every aspect of their personal lives being scrutinized.

The implications of this incident are profound, not just for Harry and Meghan, but also for the royal family as a whole. As the news spreads, questions arise about the future of their marriage, and whether this latest scandal will lead to a permanent rift between them. Harry, who has always been protective of Meghan, is now faced with a deeply personal and public betrayal, leaving many to wonder how he will respond in the coming days.

For Meghan, this incident could have serious consequences for her reputation and public image. She has long been a polarizing figure, with both ardent supporters and fierce critics. This latest scandal may only serve to deepen the divide, as some will see it as a confirmation of their worst suspicions, while others may view it as a targeted and unjustified attack on her character.

As the world waits for an official response from either Harry or Meghan, the tension surrounding this scandal continues to grow. The royal family, already dealing with numerous challenges, now faces the difficult task of managing the fallout from this latest controversy. How they choose to handle the situation could have lasting effects on the monarchy and the public’s perception of the royal institution.

Prince William and Kate Middleton announced their engagement on November 16, 2010, and royal fans are now spotting a sweet moment between the pair on the historic day

Fans noticed a moment Kate seemed particularly nervous

Prince Harry, William struck with sudden grief as they receive sad news

Prince Harry and Prince William have suffered a heartbreaking loss amid ongoing feud.

The two feuding royal brothers are in shock over the sad demise of their beloved uncle Lord Robert Fellowes, who breathed his last at the age of 82.

Lord Robert, who was the husband of their late mom Princess Diana’s older sister Jane, passed away earlier this week. He was also a private secretary to the late Queen during the 1990s.

Jane had been married to him for more than 40 years and they had three children – Laura, Alexander and Eleanor – who are all cousins of William and Harry. Laura is also a godmother to Princess Charlotte.

Lord Robert also worked as private secretary to the late Queen during some of the most dramatic times during the 1990s.

He advised the former monarch through her annus horribilis in 1992 when the marriages of Charles and Diana and Fergie and Andrew broke down and a fire engulfed Windsor Castle.

He was also in the role when his sister-in-law Diana at the age of 36 died following a car crash in Paris in 1997. He was part of her small trusted group of advisors, who guided the Royal Family during the turbulent time and according to The Times, which has ran his obituary, helped to write the speech Elizabeth II gave to the nation from Buckingham Palace on the eve of Diana’s funeral.

His role of being a palace courtier meant he often had a strained relationship with his sister-in-law, but when she died suddenly, he said: “I was deeply fond of her. She was a very good person. She found it difficult in life to find happiness, and I’m sad for people who have that situation.”

His position meant that he was depicted in the hit Netflix series, The Crown, where he was played by Andrew Havill and he remained an extra equerry to the late Queen until her death in 2022. He died on Monday at the age of 82 from undisclosed causes.

Meghan Markle accused of ‘manipulating’ Prince Harry

Prince Harry has faced fresh backlash for his alleged decision to say the royal family goodbye for wife Meghan Markle as majority of Americans think he’s being used by the Duchess.

The Duke of Sussex has been slammed for not being “as intelligent” as former Suits star Meghan Markle, a commentator has claimed.

American media personality Candace Owens has lashed out at the Duke of Sussex for being “manipulated” by Meghan since the start of their relationship in 2016.

Meghan and Harry, who stepped down as senior royals in 2020 and relocated to the US to start their new lives, securing a number of lucrative deals with entertainment moguls Netflix and Spotify even though they had no big experience.

Expressing her anger over Harry’s some shock decisions, Owens claimed the Duke “followed Meghan’s American dream” and is “subject to her manipulation”.

The journalist also flayed the Duke for his UK stunt as he spent a maximum of 45 minutes with the King following his cancer diagnosis, claiming Americans are “not pleased” with the Duke returning to the US.

“I knew they would end up in LA because that was Meghan’s dream. Her dream was to be an A-lister and she was unable to make it on the basis of her own merit as an actress.” Owens told GBN America host Nigel Farage.

Owen wen on saying: “So she figured out how to manoeuvre that by marrying a Prince, who the only way to say it, is he’s just not as intelligent as her. He’s not reading the situation as clearly as other people are reading it. And he has been subjected to her manipulation.”

She even alleged that Meghan to “deconstruct” the royal family, accusing: “She wanted fame and she wanted wealth. And I don’t want to say that Prince Harry was an unwitting participant. He obviously is not as smart as her, but also he liked the fame and he liked the attention in a certain way as well.”

In reaction to Owens comments, Nigel Farage admitted it will be “very hard” for the royal family to forgive Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for what they have done.