Blog

Long before Meghan Markle fell in love with Prince Harry and became the Duchess of Sussex we know today, one former ESPN host has revealed he had hoped to find romance with the star, but things didn’t quite go to plan. Former ESPN host Ryen Russillo once slid into Meghan’s DM’s after running into each other while playing a game of celebrity flag football, but despite his high hopes, Russillo, now 49, revealed that Meghan wasn’t nearly as thrilled about the prospect during Super Bowl weekend 2014, reports UsWeekly.

Recalling their meeting on The Bill Simmons podcast, Ryen revealed: “We played in a celebrity flag football game together and it was all of the [ Sports Illustrated ] swimsuit models. So, nobody was really paying any attention to Markle.”

The game featured a host of former NFL stars and famous faces including The Vampire Diaries actress Nina Dobrev, Black Panther star Michael B Jordan, and Sports Illustrated models like Chrissy Teigen, Nina Agdal and Hannah Davis, meaning Meghan was in some impressive company for the fun-filled match.

“I was like, ‘That’s my lane. She’s probably doubting herself a little bit right now,’” Russillo remembered. “She’s never been more obtainable.”

The game took place just before Suits season 4 premiered, and was around two years before Meghan first started dating her future husband Prince Harry. Following the conclusion of the game however, Russillo decided to shoot his shot and send the future-Duchess a cheeky DM.

“It was a very soft sell,” Russillo explained. “It was, ‘Hey, I know the new season of Suits is coming out if you ever want to come on the show to promote it.’ It was really professional.”

Meghan Markle and Nina Dobrev participate in DIRECTV’s 8th Annual Celebrity Beach Bowl
Despite the professional sell however, he did admit he had an ulterior motive at play adding: “It was like a gauging of interest,” he said. “Like, if I got an emoji back, who knows?”

Not long after sending the DM, Meghan did respond to the invitation, but it wasn’t quite the warm reception Russillo might have hoped for. “It was ice cold,” Russillo recalled. DM. “It was, ‘Oh, I don’t know anything about sports, but thanks for the offer.’”

Although no budding romance ensued from the celebrity flag football game, Meghan did however walk away with a lifelong friendship, as it was the very same match that saw her meet and befriend her new BFF Serena Williams.

“When Serena Williams barrelled in my direction this past February at an event, nails done, hair done, everything did, I’ll be honest and say I looked behind me to see who she was running to. It was Serena Williams, after all,” Markle wrote on her blog The Tig in August 2014.

Markle continued: “We hit it off immediately, taking pictures, laughing through the flag football game we were both playing in, and chatting not about tennis or acting, but about all the good old fashioned girly stuff. So began our friendship. She quickly became a confidante I would text when I was traveling, the friend I would rally around for her tennis matches, and the down to earth chick I was able to grab lunch with just a couple weeks ago in Toronto.”

Whenever Prince Louis attends royal events with his parents Prince William and Princess Kate, he always steals the show.

A firm favorite amongst royal fans, the adorable six-year-old recently stepped out with his siblings Prince George, 11, and Princess Charlotte, nine, to attend the Christmas carol service that Kate puts on each year at Westminster Abbey.

Royal watchers are always delighted when the three Wales children accompany their parents to official engagements – and it doesn’t happen that often, because the future King and Queen work hard to ensure that their three youngsters get to enjoy as normal a childhood as possible.

When Louis appeared at the carol service it also marked a break with somewhat of a royal tradition – and this isn’t the first time Louis has been spotted doing this. Generally speaking, when male royal children are young they are rarely seen in long trousers, instead opting for shorts that are deemed more age-appropriate – however for the second year in a row, Louis wore full-length trousers to the festive event.

Louis looked adorable in a full suit – something he hasn’t worn before at an official engagement – and he was perfectly coordinated with big brother George and dad William, with all three sporting bright red ties that were in the same shade as Kate’s festive coat.

As reported in Hello magazine, before the age of seven it’s quite unusual to see a royal child in a full suit, with George donning one for the first time at that age, when he attended the Euro 2020 final in London, so Louis has been allowed to do so a whole year earlier than his big brother.

A protocol expert and etiquette coach – William Hanson – has previously explained to Hello why the royals err towards short when it comes to dressing their children: “Today, young boys usually transition into trousers around age seven. Prince George is always seen in shorts because upper-class and upper-middle-class parents believe that little boys should look like little boys, and so try to keep their offspring looking as cute and innocent for as long as possible.”

The expert continued:”It’s one of the many silent class indicators we have in Britain. Trousers on young boys is considered a tad suburban and lower market.”

In 2023, Louis did sport a pair of full-length trousers for the Christmas carol service, but instead of a full suit, he wore a cosy double-breasted coat and a checked shirt beneath, showing that Prince William and Princess Kate may have been transitioning him slowly toward a full smart suit.

Given the cold weather at this time of year, it’s no surprise that the couple were happy to let Louis wear long trousers – whatever established etiquette amongst the upper classes is. Kate and William are said to be hands-on parents, who put their responsibilities towards their children above all else – so breaking with this tradition to ensure their youngest son is nice and warm is a clear indicator of their priorities.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle had only been dating for one year when they got engaged and this was because of a crucial reason, a royal author has claimed.

The couple’s love story began with a blind date in 2016. The following year, they announced their engagement and then they got married in a star-studded ceremony at Windsor Castle in May 2018.

It is claimed that Harry’s brother, Prince William, who dated Catherine for eight years before proposing, was “nervous” about how quickly the couple were moving at the beginning of their relationship as he worried that Meghan would struggle to adapt to royal life in such a short time. However, Harry brushed off his brother’s concerns, claiming he had to marry Meghan quickly as her “biological clock was ticking” since she was almost 35 years old, according to royal author Tina Brown.

Harry and Meghan with William and Catherine following the death of Queen Elizabeth II ( 
Image:
Getty Images)
She wrote in her book “The Palace Papers: Inside the House of Windsor” that William was worried Harry “was heading for trouble” due to the fact Meghan had to change her whole life, give up acting, and move from the US to the UK, where she didn’t know many people. Ms Brown, who previously edited Tatler and The New Yorker, claimed William was also worried that Meghan was not prepared for the “scorching scrutiny and harassment” that comes with being a member of the Royal Family.

But according to the book, Harry’s response to William’s concerns was that he would need to marry Meghan “as quickly as possible” so that she could receive the same police protection that he did while he was still a working royal. And it has also been claimed that Harry said that Meghan’s biological clock was ticking since she was a month from turning 35, the Daily Mail reported.

In 2022, a similar claim was also made by royal author Tom Bower, who wrote in his book that after her first date with Harry, Meghan told a friend her biological clock was ticking and she wanted children. The couple, who moved to the US in 2020 after stepping down as senior royals, are now parents to Prince Archie, five, and Princess Lilibet, three.

Harry and Meghan engaged their engagement in 2017 ( 
Image:
Chris Jackson/Getty Images)
Back in 2017, Harry admitted “the stars were aligned” as he opened up on his relationship with Meghan. He told BBC presenter Mishal Husain during their first joint TV interview: “The fact that I fell in love with Meghan so incredibly quickly was confirmation to me that all the stars were aligned, everything was just perfect. This beautiful woman just tripped and fell into my life, I fell into her life.”

Speaking about the moment Harry got down on one knee, Meghan said: “Just a cosy night, it was – what we were doing just roasting chicken and having …” Interrupting Meghan, Harry said: “Roasting a chicken, trying to roast a chicken.”

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex at the Unidad Recreativa El Vallado in Colombia in August ( 
Image:
Archewell Foundation via Getty Images)
Meghan continued: “Trying to roast a chicken and it just – just an amazing surprise, it was so sweet and natural and very romantic. He got on one knee.” The former actress admitted she “barely” let her now-husband finish proposing before she said: “Can I say yes now?”

Harry added: “She didn’t even let me finish, she said can I say yes, can I say yes and then were was hugs and I had the ring in my finger and I was like can I – can I give you the ring? She goes – oh yes the ring. So no it was – it was a really nice moment, it was just the two of us and I think managed to catch – catch her by surprise as well.”

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry once packed on the PDA at events, but the duo is beginning to take a more reserved approach to showcasing their love, according to a body language expert, who noticed the shift in their demeanor.

“Harry and Meghan’s relationship has evolved,” Darren Stanton said in an interview. “When looking at their body language, their public displays of affection have changed drastically over the years.”

After a series of failures in Hollywood, the Sussexes began to keep a low profile, but they’ve continued their charity work for their company, Archewell.

“When they started dating and became more established as an official couple, they were very affectionate in public, almost more affectionate than William and Kate,” Stanton noted.

The couple’s mannerisms were often compared to Prince William and Kate Middleton who rarely dote on each other at royal gatherings.

“When they started dating and became more established as an official couple, they were very affectionate in public, almost more affectionate than William and Kate,” the hypnotist noted. “I feel that they have toned it down a bit in recent times. I have seen their engaged eye contact has decreased and they aren’t as tactile with one another.”

“While they do love each other and they will do anything to support one another, we tend not to see them being as openly passionate,” he continued.

Source: MEGAMeghan Markle and Prince Harry’s romance started in 2016.

OK! previously reported the Sussexes hosted the Archewell Foundation’s first in-person gathering on World Mental Health Day, and the Duchess of Sussex guided her spouse through the social setting.

“At the event in New York his entire pose and physicality made him look uncomfortable,” Judi James explained in an interview. “He sat in an awkward position and he didn’t ‘take control’ of his seat, which means adopting a pose that retains a sense of dignity and elegance whatever chair you’ve been given.”

“When he spoke he also rubbed his hand along his thigh, up and down, several times,” James stated. “The odd self-comfort gesture can be understandably subconscious but this was repeated to a point that he must have been aware what he was doing.”

Source: MEGAMeghan Markle and Prince Harry left the U.K. in 2020.

Along with their time in Manhattan, the spouses were spotted at a charity event for Kevin Costner last fall.

“His hand gestures here at the Costner gig are also ‘different’ for Harry,” James explained. “Most of them, like clapping hands together and that high, almost pleading hand clasp are the sort of gestures that tend to say one thing: ‘Please listen to me.’”

“They suggest a desire to be listened to when someone speaks and a desire to get and hold the attention and respect of the listener,” James continued.

Although Stanton viewed the Sussexes as more relaxed in each other’s company, James saw Meghan insert herself into Harry’s conversations.

“It’s interesting here then, that Harry ends up being interrupted by his wife,” James continued. “Not only does he seem to be fighting for the guy’s attention he also seems to be losing the battle to Meghan, too. She appears to take over with a smile and social ease that Harry might be lacking.”

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry shockingly left the monarchy back in 2020, but videos of their time in the firm foreshadowed their infamous Megxit scandal.

Body language expert Darren Stanton noticed the Duke of Sussex was particularly focused on Meghan’s well-being during royal engagements in old footage.

“There is a notable distinction in his non-verbal communication when Harry is on his own compared to when he is with Meghan. He almost feels like he needs to be on duty when he is with Meghan, he seems a little bit more aware of his surroundings, like he has to present a certain brand,” the professional told an outlet.

“His body language isn’t as open and he’ll often be more reserved,” Stanton added.

Stanton further claimed that the royal appeared more sure of himself when attending gatherings alone, likely because he wasn’t fixated on Meghan’s safety.

“When he is on own, Harry has a sense of openness that we rarely see otherwise, he is very authentic in his emotions and his confidence increases as he doesn’t need to take on a protective role,” he explained.

The hypnotist later highlighted that the Sussexes’ demeanor changed upon making their big move from royal life.

“Once they moved to the States and stepped down, they weren’t restrained anymore,” the psychologist explained. “We saw an increase in public displays of affection. Meghan began wearing different outfits and colors whereas before she was restricted. Previously she wore muted tones, whereas now we see her wearing more confident shades, suggesting she is not afraid to stand out.”

For Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, a fresh perspective has emerged suggesting a shift in their relationship dynamics.

Darren Stanton, a renowned body language expert often dubbed the “Human Lie Detector,” has analyzed the couple’s brief appearance in their latest Netflix docuseries POLO. His observations indicate that Harry now appears as the “more dominant one” in their interactions.

Stanton’s expertise stems from his background in psychology and his tenure as a police officer, where he honed his skills in detecting deception. Transitioning to media consultancy, he has scrutinized numerous public figures, including members of the royal family. In POLO, Stanton notes a discernible change, “It’s important for Harry to be seen as the one who is more dominant and powerful. Meghan has previously been seen to wear the trousers in their relationship, which has affected his reputation.”

He further elaborates, “If we take a closer look at some of the posture and actions we see, Harry is taking the lead.”

This analysis contrasts with earlier perceptions of their relationship, where Meghan was often viewed as the guiding force. Their public displays of affection, such as in Colombia in August, and Meghan’s assertive presence had led many to believe she was the primary decision-maker. Stanton’s insights suggest a rebalancing, with Harry stepping into a more assertive role.

POLO, which premiered on Netflix, offers a behind-the-scenes glimpse into the world of polo, featuring elite players competing in the U.S. Open Polo Championship.

Source: MEGA/CBS/YOUTUBEThe Duke and Duchess of Sussex ‘cannot seem to land another Netflix hit,’ an insider shared.

Despite the anticipation surrounding the series, it has faced criticism for its lack of engaging content. The Telegraph described it as a “tedious inside look” at the sport, awarding it two stars and commenting, “There’s lots of blood, sweat, and tears in the series — but not enough of the Sussexes to make this anything other than a dull indulgence about a rich person’s hobby.”

The Sussexes’ limited screen time in the series has also been a point of contention. The rebel Duke appears briefly in the opening credits of the first episode and re-emerges only in the fifth and final episode, where Meghan makes a fleeting appearance. This minimal involvement has left fans yearning for more insights into their lives and perspectives.

As OK! previously reported, the couple’s biggest and thus far only hit with documentary production came with their 2022 Netflix series Harry & Meghan, which delved into their personal experiences and challenges within the royal family. While that series garnered significant attention, POLO seems to have missed the mark in captivating audiences.

Source: MEGAPrince Harry and Meghan Markle’s ‘POLO’ was perceived as out of touch due to the elite nature of the sport.

As the couple continues to navigate their public and private lives, the evolution of their partnership continues to remain a focal point of public interest.

Prince Harry is building a new life for himself in the U.S., but one royal expert thinks King Charles is worried about his son’s finances.

“The ‘Harry problem,’ as it’s known among Palace staff, continues to plague the King,” Robert Jobson wrote in Catherine, Princess of Wales. “What worries His Majesty, and his top team,’ says a Palace official, ‘is what is going to happen when all the money runs out.’”

According to the biographer, “the public has wearied of their constant complaints” after the release of Harry & Meghan and Spare.

Despite Jobson’s claims, Harry will reportedly receive $8.5 million from his inheritance from the Queen Mother on his 40th birthday, which falls on Thursday, September 15.

Aside from what his great-grandmother left him, the Duke of Sussex received an endowment from his mother, Princess Diana.

“We didn’t have a plan. That was suggested by somebody else by the point of where my family literally cut me off financially, and I had to afford . . . afford security for us,” Harry told Oprah Winfrey in 2021.

Source: MEGAIn 2021, Prince Harry claimed he was ‘cut off financially’ from the royal family.

In the explosive televised interview, the dad-of-two claimed he used what Diana left him to settle down in the U.S.

“Yeah, in the first half, the first quarter of 2020. But I’ve got what my mum left me, and, without that, we would not have been able to do this,” he revealed.

Source: MEGAPrince Harry and Meghan Markle are based in California.

Shortly after leaving the U.K., the Sussexes quickly secured coveted contracts in Hollywood, but 2023 proved to be a difficult year for them, as they were branded “grifters” and a “Hollywood flop.” OK! previously reported Meghan Markle is working on building her own empire with a Netflix cooking show and lifestyle brand American Riviera Orchard.

“This is a profound change of direction for Meghan – in some ways to become like a Martha Stewart. If Meghan can pull it off, it’s a very rich seam to mine,” PR expert Mark Borkowski told an outlet.

“If it succeeds, then it’s a massive leap forward and will take away from a lot of the negativity she’s had. And it will make a lot of people take her very seriously,” he added.

If Meghan’s Netflix series performs well, it could be lucrative for the Sussexes.

“So, as an income stream, it’s huge… if she gets it right,” Borkowski continued. “But it could be make-or-break for the Duchess if the show is yet another failure.”

“I don’t believe you can have so many failed ventures without people questioning what you’re going to do next,” he concluded.

 

Tom Parker Bowles, 49, the son of the Queen of England, Camilla, has opened up in a new interview about his impressions of the challenges his stepbrothers Prince William and Prince Harry have faced with public scrutiny.

 

Queen Camilla’s told The Telegraph that even though his own experiences with this kind of public scrutiny were far less intense than what William and Harry had dealt with, it gave him a sense of the difficulties they endured, particularly as they were growing up. Tom, a broadcaster and food writer, is the eldest child of Queen Camilla and her first husband, Andrew Parker Bowles, and saw firsthand the intense public attention that his mother received due to her romantic connection to King Charles during the monarch’s first marriage to Diana.

 

In his younger years, he got a taste of the constant scrutiny that his stepbrothers William and Harry have been under their entire lives, and called what the brothers have been put through “appalling”.

“I remember being chased at 100mph by paps trying to get a shot. My mother being screamed at to try to get a reaction. Pushing, jostling. It was horrific, and you are protective of your mother. Counting how many paps were at the gates, to see who was watching us and taking photographs: it was all as normal as bacon and eggs in the morning. You didn’t think of it in any other way … [But] it was barbaric.” While Tom showed some hesitance to speak about his stepbrothers, he could not help but express sympathy for how much worse they have had it. “I learned a long time ago not to put my fat fingers into the world of William and Harry,” the food writer said. “But it was appalling what they went through. I’ve had a billionth of what they’ve had to go through but hell, I sympathise.”
Camilla and Charles were romantically on and off for decades, but it was only in 2005 following their marriage that William and Harry gained two step-siblings, Tom and Laura, 46.

Parenting Expert Brandi Jordan, Surrogacy Rumors, and Grandparenting Lessons: Unpacking the Meghan Markle Controversy

Celebrity news often blurs the line between truth and fiction, and few families attract as much scrutiny as Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and their children. The world is captivated by the Sussexes’ every move, fueling debates and rumors, particularly about the existence of their children. This article explores the ongoing controversies surrounding Meghan Markle, focusing on the surrogacy allegations, Brandi Jordan’s parenting expertise, and the evolving role of grandparents in modern family life.For those wondering how to prepare for a royal baby, Brandi Jordan, a prominent parenting expert in Los Angeles, is the go-to consultant in Hollywood. With clients like Megan Fox and Julia Stiles, Brandi’s services are in high demand. Her sessions, costing up to $5,000 each, are expensive but valued by those seeking expert guidance.

 

At her company, The Cradle, Brandi and her team offer a wide range of courses on newborn care, child development, breastfeeding support, and postpartum recovery. One of her most popular offerings are grandparenting lessons, which help grandparents like Doria Ragland—Meghan Markle’s mother—adapt to modern parenting techniques. The fast-changing landscape of parenting often leaves older generations feeling out of touch, making Brandi’s classes a valuable resource for those looking to stay informed and supportive.

As Doria Ragland’s participation in these classes shows, modern grandparents are seeking more than just traditional wisdom. They want to equip themselves with current knowledge to better support their families. These classes teach not only practical skills like car seat installation and breastfeeding tips but also emotional support techniques for the entire family.

Rumors about Meghan Markle’s use of a surrogate for her daughter Lilibet Diana have been circulating for some time. These rumors were fueled by Meghan’s relatively private maternity journey and her decision to limit public appearances. Critics argue that there is a lack of public documentation regarding Lilibet’s birth, sparking further skepticism. However, birth certificates for Lilibet have been verified by reputable outlets like People magazine and TMZ, putting some of these rumors to rest.

Despite this, Meghan and Harry have continued to prioritize privacy, which has only added to the ongoing speculation. Their determination to shield their children from the paparazzi is understandable, given their previous legal battles with the media. While these measures are an attempt to protect their family, they have not fully quelled doubts among the public.

Beyond parenting, Meghan and Harry are dealing with pressures in both their personal and professional lives. Reports of tension over their Netflix docuseries and Harry’s memoir, Spare, suggest that their marriage has faced challenges. Insiders claim that disagreements between the couple have sometimes led to heated arguments, with Harry needing time to cool down.

Their public personas have created conflicting narratives, as the docuseries and memoir tell different sides of the story. This leaves the public wondering whether their content reflects genuine values or is simply a product of the pressure to meet expectations.

The public’s fascination with Meghan and Harry’s lives comes down to the universal intrigue of celebrity parenthood. Parenthood is deeply personal, but for celebrities, it becomes a spectacle. Meghan and Harry’s attempts to balance their private family life with public expectations have sparked debates on privacy versus transparency.

Through their experiences, Meghan and Doria demonstrate the importance of family support, adaptability, and boundaries. The support system within families plays a critical role in effective parenting, and trying new methods shows a willingness to grow. Meghan and Doria’s actions also highlight the value of setting boundaries to protect family privacy.

While headlines may focus on scandal and drama, Meghan and Harry’s journey reflects resilience and adaptability. Their choices challenge outdated norms and push for a more compassionate approach to family life. This journey can inspire lessons for families everywhere, not just those in the public eye.

Despite constant scrutiny, Meghan Markle’s ability to remain composed amidst controversy is a testament to her strength as a mother and public figure. Her resilience continues to inspire conversations about the intersection of family life and fame.

The intrigue surrounding Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and their family highlights a universal truth—family dynamics are relatable to everyone. The challenges of love, support, and building a life together are common to all families, whether they’re in the public eye or not.

Reflect on how the insights from Meghan and Doria’s journey apply to your own life. Are there areas where your family could benefit from better communication or updated practices? Could setting clearer boundaries improve your relationships? Share your thoughts and experiences below.

At the end of the day, we can all learn from each other’s journeys as we continue the conversation about parenting, grandparenting, and navigating life’s challenges with grace and empathy.

The ongoing narrative surrounding Meghan Markle’s parenting decisions and family dynamics mirrors broader societal shifts. These themes—privacy, support, and adaptability—transcend the Royal family and resonate with parents and grandparents everywhere.

 

What happens when one of Hollywood’s sharpest wits takes aim at one of the most polarizing figures in the world? You get Peter Dinklage delivering a roast of Meghan Markle that has everyone talking. During his recent appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live, the Game of Thrones star didn’t hold back, dropping jaw-dropping one-liners ranging from hilariously scathing to shockingly bold. But why did Dinklage call for her to be locked up and accuse her of turning Prince Harry into a puppet?

Imagine this: Peter Dinklage strides onto the Jimmy Kimmel Live stage to roaring applause. With his signature charm and wit, he begins recounting the absurdities of modern celebrity culture. The audience is in stitches. But then, like a master strategist, he shifts gears, turning his comedic sights on Meghan Markle.”I think we’ve got ourselves a royal crisis,” Dinklage quips, a mischievous smile spreading across his face. What followed wasn’t just a roast; it was a scathing commentary wrapped in biting humor. Why did Dinklage decide to dive headfirst into one of the most talked-about royal dramas, and how did the audience react to his unapologetic takedown? Let’s dive deeper.

 

Peter Dinklage didn’t tiptoe around his thoughts on Meghan Markle. In his trademark deadpan delivery, he joked about her departure from royal life, likening it to an escape plan gone hilariously wrong. “Leaving Buckingham Palace for a Netflix deal? That’s not betrayal; that’s just bad business,” he said, earning a wave of laughter from the audience. But it wasn’t just about Meghan’s career choices—Dinklage dug into the alleged rift she created within the royal family, turning Harry against his family.

“That’s some next-level Shakespearean villainy. If I didn’t know better, I’d think she’s auditioning for House of the Dragon,” Dinklage said, sending the crowd into an uproar. But was there some truth behind the jokes? Let’s break down Dinklage’s boldest claims.

Dinklage wasn’t shy about addressing the elephant in the room: Meghan Markle’s influence on Prince Harry. He joked that Harry’s actions seemed less like independent choices and more like a marionette being pulled by invisible strings. “Harry used to be a royal wild card, partying in Vegas and wearing questionable costumes. Now he’s sipping green juice in Montecito. Who’s really calling the shots here?” Dinklage asked, his tone dripping with mock incredulity.

But why does this narrative resonate with so many people? Is it because Meghan and Harry represent a break from tradition, or is there deeper discomfort with how they’ve handled their royal exit?

Toward the climax of his roast, Dinklage dropped the bombshell: “You know what? Lock her up. Not for treason or betrayal, but for the crime of turning one of the world’s most eligible bachelors into an Instagram husband.” The audience gasped and then roared with laughter. Delivered with such tongue-in-cheek flair, this line became an instant viral moment. But behind the humor was a deeper commentary on how Meghan Markle has become a lightning rod for criticism—fair or not.

Dinklage’s roast touched on something universal: the public’s fascination with royalty and the stark divide between tradition and modernity. Markle’s actions challenge centuries of royal protocol, but they also highlight broader societal shifts—relatability versus resentment. Meghan and Harry’s decision to step away from royal duties resonates with those seeking independence, but it also alienates traditionalists.

Dinklage’s roast also poked fun at the couple’s pivot to Hollywood, which some see as a downgrade from their royal stature. At its core, the Markle saga is a family feud on a grand scale—and who doesn’t love a juicy family drama?

While Peter Dinklage’s roast was meant to entertain, it also served as a mirror reflecting society’s obsession with fame, power, and tradition. Here are some key takeaways:

Humor as Commentary: Comedy can be a powerful way to tackle uncomfortable truths. Dinklage used humor to critique both Markle’s choices and the public’s reaction to her.

The Cost of Fame: Meghan and Harry’s story reminds us that breaking free from tradition often comes with a heavy price: public scrutiny and endless debate.

Choosing Your Path: Whether you’re Team Meghan or Team Royal Family, one thing is clear: forging your own path isn’t easy, especially under the spotlight.

Peter Dinklage’s roast wasn’t just a comedy segment—it was a cultural moment. By using humor to address a deeply polarizing topic, he sparked conversations that went beyond Meghan Markle and Prince Harry. His sharp wit reminded us that no one is above a good joke, and sometimes laughter is the best way to process complicated feelings. As the episode wrapped up, Dinklage left the audience with a parting thought: “At the end of the day, whether you’re royal or not, family is complicated. And if you don’t believe me, just wait until Thanksgiving dinner.”

As soon as Dinklage’s segment aired, the internet lit up with reactions. Social media exploded with hashtags like #DinkRoast, #MeghanVsDinklage, and even the cheeky #LockHerUp. Though clearly meant as a joke, fans of Dinklage praised his comedic genius, while supporters of Meghan Markle were less amused, accusing the actor of punching down and perpetuating a narrative that has already caused harm.

But isn’t that what great comedy does? It sparks conversation, provokes thought, and sometimes walks the fine line between funny and controversial.

The beauty and chaos of social media lie in its ability to amplify every perspective. Within hours of the episode airing, there were memes, debates, and countless hot takes. Here’s a snapshot of how people reacted:

Team Dinklage: Many fans celebrated the roast as a refreshing and humorous take on the royal drama. “Finally, someone said what we’ve all been thinking, but with style,” tweeted one user.

Team Meghan: Others argued that the jokes went too far, especially given Meghan’s public struggles with mental health and relentless media scrutiny. “Making her the punchline feels cruel, not clever,” wrote another.

Neutral Observers: Some simply enjoyed the roast for what it was—a comedy bit. “People need to relax. It’s a joke, not a manifesto,” one commenter quipped.

Dinklage’s roast wasn’t born in a vacuum. It tapped into a years-long saga that has captured global attention. To understand why his jokes landed with such force, we need to look at the broader context of Meghan Markle’s journey from Hollywood actress to royal renegade.

The Fairy Tale Gone Wrong: Meghan’s entrance into the royal family was initially celebrated as a modern, progressive shift. But the honeymoon period didn’t last, and rumors of rifts, protocol breaches, and media clashes began to surface.

The Hollywood Pivot: After leaving the UK, Meghan and Harry moved to California, fueling criticism. Dinklage’s joke about the Netflix deal struck a chord because it highlighted the jarring shift from royal dignity to Hollywood hustle.

The Public Persona Problem: Meghan and Harry’s high-profile interviews, especially their explosive sitdown with Oprah, only added fuel to the fire. Some saw their revelations as necessary airing of grievances, while others viewed them as a betrayal of the royal family.

Comedy has long been a tool for addressing uncomfortable truths. Dinklage’s roast used satire to poke fun at a situation that sometimes feels absurd. The art of the roast isn’t about pure meanness; it’s about balancing sharp criticism with clever delivery. Dinklage’s performance on Jimmy Kimmel succeeded because it was rooted in wit, not malice—inviting laughter rather than outrage.

The best comedy doesn’t just make us laugh—it makes us think. Dinklage’s roast highlighted our collective obsession with royalty and the contradictions inherent in Meghan and Harry’s story. Why do we expect them to uphold royal traditions while craving their rebellion? Why are we so invested in their choices, even though they live a world away?

Dinklage’s roast may have reignited the Meghan Markle debate, but it’s unlikely to be the final word on the matter. As Meghan and Harry continue to carve out their post-royal lives, they remain a lightning rod for controversy and a source of endless fascination.