In a tense and emotional scene outside the County Court of Victoria, Jo Silvagni, the wife of AFL legend Stephen Silvagni, exploded in anger at a persistent reporter moments after their youngest son, Tom Silvagni, was sentenced to six years and two months in prison for rape. The 23-year-old was convicted earlier this month of two counts of digital rape following a 2024 incident at the family’s home.

As the couple hurriedly left the courthouse, flanked by security and avoiding the swarm of media, a well-known Channel 7 reporter approached them with questions about the verdict and the family’s ongoing claims of Tom’s innocence. “Mrs Silvagni, do you still believe your son is innocent after today’s sentencing?” the reporter asked.

Jo Silvagni, visibly distraught and protective, wheeled around and screamed directly into the reporter’s face: “Shut up! Just shut up!” Her voice echoed across the courthouse steps, laced with fury and desperation. She insisted vehemently that her son was innocent, calling the accusations “completely absurd and a miscarriage of justice.” Eyewitnesses described her as trembling with rage, her eyes filled with tears as she defended Tom, repeating that the jury had got it wrong and that the family would fight to clear his name.

For minutes, Stephen Silvagni remained silent, walking stoically beside his wife with his head down, offering no comment as cameras flashed and microphones were thrust forward. The media pack pressed harder, asking about the victim’s powerful impact statement and the judge’s remarks on Tom’s lack of remorse.

Then, in a moment that left everyone stunned, Stephen Silvagni – the usually composed Carlton Football Club hall-of-famer known as “SOS” (Son of Serge) – suddenly broke his silence. Stopping abruptly, he turned to the reporters and said in a low, gravelly voice: “Enough is enough. We’ve supported him through this, but maybe it’s time we face the truth.” The remark hung in the air like a bombshell, interpreted by those present as a potential crack in the family’s united front of denial. Gasps were audible from the gathered journalists, and one cameraman reportedly dropped his equipment in shock.

The couple quickly resumed walking, ignoring follow-up shouts, as they were ushered into a waiting car. Neither has made an official statement since, but sources close to the family say the comment was born out of exhaustion and the immense pressure of the high-profile case.

The dramatic confrontation capped a harrowing day in court for the Silvagni family, one of Australia’s most famous AFL dynasties. Tom Silvagni, the youngest of three sons – brother to St Kilda player Jack and former Carlton-listed Ben – appeared via video link from custody as Judge Gregory Lyon handed down the sentence. The 23-year-old showed no visible reaction as the judge described his actions as “marked by planning, cunning and strategy,” highlighting a complete lack of remorse and empathy for the victim.

The crime occurred in January 2024 at the Silvagni family’s Balwyn North home. The victim, a young woman in a casual relationship with Tom’s friend, had consensual sex with her partner before he left in an Uber. Tom then entered the dark bedroom, pretended to be the boyfriend, and digitally raped her twice – once by deception and once while restraining her despite her protests. He later forged an Uber receipt in a bid to create an alibi, which the jury rejected as evidence of a cover-up.

In sentencing, Judge Lyon praised the victim’s “real integrity and courage” for coming forward and reading her impact statement in person. She described the trauma haunting her “every single day,” leading to nightmares, PTSD, and shattered trust in relationships. The judge noted Tom’s good rehabilitation prospects due to his youth, supportive family, and lack of prior convictions but stressed the seriousness of the deception involved.

Tom must serve at least three years and three months before being eligible for parole, having already spent 12 days in pre-sentence detention.

The case has gripped the nation, not just for the salacious details but for the prominence of the Silvagni name. Stephen Silvagni, a dual premiership player and AFL Team of the Century full-back, and Jo, a former Sale of the Century host and longtime TV personality known for Chemist Warehouse ads, have been fixtures in Melbourne’s elite circles. Their grandson lineage traces back to Sergio Silvagni, another Carlton great.

Throughout the proceedings, the family maintained Tom’s innocence. After the guilty verdict on December 5, Stephen tearfully told media: “Our son continues to maintain his innocence, and we stand firmly behind him.” They flagged a possible appeal, and sources indicate lawyers are still exploring options.

However, today’s alleged remark from Stephen has sparked intense speculation. Was it a slip revealing doubt after hearing the judge’s scathing assessment? Or frustration at the media frenzy? Friends of the family describe the Silvagnis as “devastated and divided,” with the weight of public scrutiny and the victim’s unflinching testimony taking a toll.

The outburst from Jo reflects a mother’s fierce protectiveness, but her physical shoving of a female reporter (as reported in some outlets) and sharp words have drawn criticism online, with many accusing the family of victim-blaming. Social media has erupted, with hashtags like #JusticeForTheVictim trending alongside debates over privilege in the justice system.

Tom’s suppression order, fiercely fought by high-powered lawyers, was lifted just days before sentencing, unleashing a flood of coverage. Previously referred to as a “man from a high-profile Victorian family,” his identity became common knowledge despite the gag.

Victim advocates have hailed the sentence as a victory, emphasizing that no amount of fame shields perpetrators. “This shows the system can work, even against powerful families,” said one spokesperson from a sexual assault support group.

As Tom begins his prison term, questions linger about the Silvagni family’s future. Jack Silvagni, now at St Kilda, has remained silent amid his own career pressures. Jo’s advertising contracts, including with major brands, are reportedly under review.

In the end, Stephen’s stunning remark may prove the most enduring image from a case that has exposed the raw pain behind a glamorous facade. Whether it signals a shift in the family’s stance or a moment of raw emotion remains unclear, but it has left the media – and the public – reeling.

The Silvagnis have requested privacy as they process the outcome. An appeal lodging is expected in coming weeks.