Drive to Survive: The Drama Behind Formula 1’s Most Controversial Show

Since its debut in 2019, Netflix’s Drive to Survive has become a global sensation. It pulled Formula 1 out of its niche audience and placed it in front of millions of new eyes, particularly in the United States. With its behind-the-scenes access, emotional storytelling, and high-octane drama, the series revitalized the sport’s image, capturing the personal lives, rivalries, and high-stakes decisions of the paddock. But in 2024, the show faces its toughest opponent yet: the growing criticism that it has sacrificed truth for drama.

Max Verstappen Calls It Out

Among the most vocal critics is three-time world champion Max Verstappen. Never shy to speak his mind, Verstappen has long expressed frustration with how Drive to Survive misrepresents events and personalities for the sake of entertainment. After the 2024 Miami Grand Prix, Verstappen sarcastically remarked that he was “apparently very sad” about Lando Norris’s first-ever Formula 1 win—despite actual footage showing him warmly congratulating Norris. The show, however, used out-of-context clips from other events to paint a different picture: a bitter rival overshadowed by a rising star.

Verstappen’s comments aren’t isolated. He previously declined to participate in earlier seasons, citing the show’s tendency to “fake rivalries” and “manufacture drama.” Now, with more evidence backing his claims, his concerns have reignited a broader conversation about how far the series has drifted from the reality it claims to portray.

Fans See Through the Fiction

Longtime F1 fans have been equally vocal. While no one denies that Drive to Survive has been a marketing success—helping boost attendance, viewership, and even sponsorship deals—the storytelling strategy increasingly comes across as manipulative. The Miami incident was just one example. In another case, the series portrayed George Russell as the dominant force at Mercedes without mentioning his disqualification from a major race due to a technical infringement. This omission painted an incomplete and arguably misleading picture of the 2024 season.

Then there was the departure of Adrian Newey, one of the sport’s most influential engineers, from Red Bull—a major moment that barely got a mention. Instead, the show leaned into interpersonal drama within the team, brushing over one of the biggest technical shake-ups in recent memory. Similarly, Oliver Bearman’s incredible debut in Saudi Arabia and subsequent points-scoring performance with two different teams in a single season—a historic feat—was reduced to a footnote, if mentioned at all.

When Drama Replaces Documentation

These examples underscore a growing concern: Drive to Survive is no longer a documentary series but a dramatized reality show loosely based on real events. And that’s a problem, particularly in a sport as complex and driven as Formula 1. Fans don’t mind a bit of tension or theatrical editing—but when moments are deliberately recontextualized or ignored, it undermines the integrity of the sport and the trust of the audience.

This isn’t a new issue in entertainment. Other docuseries like The Last Dance or The Last Dance have faced similar criticisms. But in Formula 1, where every millisecond and team decision can make or break a season, factual accuracy matters more than most genres. By manipulating reality, the show not only misrepresents events but also reshapes how new fans perceive the drivers, teams, and the competition itself.

Misleading the Casual Audience

A casual viewer who watches Drive to Survive without following the actual races might walk away with a very different understanding of what truly happened. Imagine believing that Mercedes had a dominant showing at the Belgian Grand Prix—because the show didn’t mention George Russell’s disqualification. Or thinking that Max Verstappen and Lando Norris are fierce enemies, when in reality they celebrated together after Norris’s victory.

This warped perspective isn’t harmless. It creates confusion, spreads misinformation, and even fuels online toxicity between fanbases, based on fictionalized storylines rather than real sportsmanship or competition.

What’s the Line Between Entertainment and Misrepresentation?

Every show needs to keep its audience engaged, and editing for emotional impact isn’t inherently wrong. But Drive to Survive often crosses a line. Important race results, season-defining technical changes, and emotional victories—like Lewis Hamilton’s triumphant return to the top step of the podium at Silverstone in 2024—are sometimes skimmed over or reframed entirely.

There’s also a broader cultural implication here. As Formula 1 continues to grow globally, particularly in the U.S., Drive to Survive is often the first exposure many fans have to the sport. That first impression matters. If it’s based on misleading information, it damages the credibility not just of the show, but of Formula 1 as a whole.

Where Do We Go From Here?

The backlash now playing out across social media isn’t just a minor grumble. It’s a warning sign. F1 veterans, newer fans with deeper interest in the sport, and even the drivers themselves are calling for a course correction.

The solution isn’t to cancel Drive to Survive. Far from it—the show has done too much good for the sport to be abandoned. Instead, it needs to return to its roots as a documentary with drama, not drama disguised as a documentary. Key race moments should be presented with accuracy. Driver personalities should be respected, not repurposed for clicks. And editorial decisions should enhance, not distort, the emotional resonance of the season.

A Fork in the Road

As it stands, Drive to Survive is at a crossroads. It can double down on manufactured storylines and risk alienating the passionate base that fueled its rise—or it can evolve into a more honest portrayal of the sport. A show that balances authenticity with storytelling would not only keep current fans but also educate and inspire the next generation of F1 enthusiasts.

Formula 1 is dramatic by nature. With fierce rivalries, shocking crashes, weather unpredictability, and strategic gambles that can flip the outcome of a race, the sport doesn’t need fabricated tension to be compelling. The truth is dramatic enough.

If Netflix and the show’s producers take the feedback to heart, they have the opportunity to refine Drive to Survive into something even more powerful: a show that informs, excites, and earns the trust of both new fans and longtime followers alike.

Until then, fans will keep asking the same question: Is Drive to Survive telling the story of Formula 1—or rewriting it?

Full Video: