Steering into Uncertainty: Hamilton, Leclerc, and Ferrari’s Identity Crisis

Byline: An in-depth look at how a steering feel debate could define Ferrari’s Formula 1 future

It was lap one, turn three, during Lewis Hamilton’s first test at Fiorano in Ferrari’s SF-25 when something subtle yet monumental occurred—not on track, but deep in the mechanical soul of the car. Over the radio, Hamilton posed a question that startled engineers: “What have you done with the steering feel?”

That moment, seemingly innocuous, revealed a foundational flaw in Ferrari’s 2025 Formula 1 campaign. Hamilton, one of the sport’s most adaptable and decorated drivers, was not just surprised—he was unsettled. What he felt through his hands wasn’t a new car’s quirks, but a void in connection. The steering—his most vital link to the machine—felt wrong. Not merely unfamiliar, but devoid of the tactile feedback drivers rely on to navigate the razor’s edge between grip and catastrophe.

The issue? Power steering calibration. And it’s more than a technical hiccup—it’s a microcosm of Ferrari’s perennial identity crisis in modern Formula 1.

The Roots of the Problem

The SF-25’s steering issue didn’t originate in 2025. Its DNA traces back two years, when Ferrari adjusted its steering system to suit Carlos Sainz’s style. Sainz favored initial corner stability and smooth resistance over razor-sharp responses. To accommodate him, engineers recalibrated the power steering’s assist curve, dampening sensitivity at turn-in.

That setup suited Sainz but never fully clicked with Charles Leclerc, who prefers a livelier front end that rotates aggressively. And now, it utterly alienates Hamilton, who built his career in cars that offered intuitive, hyperlinear steering feel—especially in the dominant Mercedes machines of the hybrid era.

Hamilton’s first feedback was stark: “This isn’t just different—it’s wrong.”

A Deeper Dilemma

Changing a Formula 1 car’s steering feel is no simple task. It’s not just software tuning. It’s a complex reengineering of the entire feedback loop—from hydraulic assist levels and steering rack geometry to electronic damping and how that integrates with aerodynamic stability.

Ferrari faces a dilemma: recalibrate the system to suit Hamilton and risk destabilizing a platform Leclerc has adapted to, or maintain the status quo and leave their seven-time champion lacking confidence. Both paths carry performance trade-offs. And in a title fight where margins are measured in tenths per lap, trust in the car isn’t a luxury—it’s a necessity.

Beneath the technicalities lies a strategic fault line. Unlike Red Bull, which unambiguously builds its cars around Max Verstappen, or Mercedes, which tailored its dominant era machinery around Hamilton, Ferrari has clung to the ideal of equal treatment for both drivers. That philosophy, noble on paper, is beginning to crack under the pressure of modern F1’s ruthlessly competitive environment.

Two Drivers, One Team, Divergent Needs

For Hamilton, unfamiliar steering feel isn’t just a preference—it’s a potential performance ceiling. His ability to extract pace depends on confidence in every corner. For Leclerc, who’s adapted over time to an imperfect system, the risk is that a Hamilton-centered recalibration might upend his own sense of comfort.

In the middle sits Team Principal Fred Vasseur, tasked with mediating not only engineering solutions but emotional dynamics. Can he balance Hamilton’s legacy with Leclerc’s loyalty? Can Ferrari satisfy both without compromising either?

This isn’t just about turn-in response. It’s about identity. Hamilton comes from a background where his preferences shaped the car’s DNA. Leclerc, by contrast, has long felt the effects of a setup tilted toward Sainz. With Sainz now out of the picture, the development axis is shifting—yet the car remains a relic of past compromises.

The Championship at Stake

Ferrari’s internal discord arrives at a critical juncture. They trail Red Bull in the Constructors’ standings, but the gap is closing. Both Hamilton and Leclerc are within striking distance of the Drivers’ title, separated by less than 40 points from Verstappen.

In such a tight race, minor setup misalignments or lapses in driver confidence can snowball into lost points. A single compromised qualifying session due to vague steering feel could cost a podium—or a championship.

This steering issue isn’t just a matter of comfort. It directly impacts tire management, corner entry consistency, and race-long pace. Without resolution, Ferrari risks losing more than races. They could lose their shot at glory in both title fights.

A Familiar Pattern, A Dangerous Precedent

Ferrari’s predicament echoes a broader historical pattern. Teams that win consistently do so by building around a single, clear vision. Red Bull shaped its entire design philosophy around Sebastian Vettel during his championship run. Mercedes did the same for Hamilton during its dominance. Even McLaren has begun aligning its development around Lando Norris.

Ferrari, however, has hesitated. Post-Schumacher, they’ve tried to maintain a balance—equal treatment, shared development. Yet the result has been a string of seasons where neither driver has consistently extracted the car’s full potential. The SF-25’s steering issue is merely the latest symptom of this deeper institutional reluctance.

2026 Looms Large

The stakes extend far beyond 2025. New regulations arrive in 2026, offering a clean slate. The groundwork being laid now—steering philosophy included—will shape the next generation of Ferrari’s F1 identity.

Red Bull will double down on Verstappen. Mercedes will likely bet on George Russell. McLaren has already chosen Norris. Ferrari must decide: build the SF-26 around Hamilton’s world-class instincts, Leclerc’s longstanding familiarity, or remain stuck in neutral, accommodating both and satisfying neither.

The time for diplomacy is over. In Formula 1, clarity wins championships.

Conclusion: More Than Steering

This isn’t just a technical debate—it’s a philosophical reckoning. Steering feel has become symbolic of Ferrari’s broader struggle: tradition versus transformation, caution versus commitment.

For Hamilton, the move to Ferrari was a bold final chapter, a bet that the Scuderia could shed its indecision and return to glory. For Ferrari, the challenge is not just to recalibrate feedback but to recalibrate focus.

If they get it right, they could ignite a new era of dominance. If they hesitate, 2025 will be another near-miss, and 2026 may slip away before it begins.

The hands of the drivers are on the wheel. But it’s Ferrari’s direction that matters most.

Full Video: