“A Bombshell at Buckingham: Fury Erupts as King Charles Accused of Gaslighting Britain on 7/7 Anniversary”

It was supposed to be a solemn day of remembrance—an anniversary to honor the 52 souls lost and over 700 injured in one of Britain’s darkest hours. But instead, July 7, 2025—the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 terrorist attacks—ignited a firestorm of controversy as King Charles III’s official statement was met with rage, disbelief, and accusations of betrayal from survivors, commentators, and citizens across the nation.

At the heart of the uproar? A single sentence.

“Let us therefore use this 20th anniversary,” the King said, “to reaffirm our commitment to building a society where people of all faiths and backgrounds can live together with mutual respect and understanding—always standing firm against those who would seek to divide us.”

But what exactly did “those who would seek to divide us” mean?

For broadcaster Dan Wootton and political commentator Alex Phillips, the implication was crystal clear—and deeply offensive.

“I have great respect for the King,” Wootton began solemnly on his show Outspoken, “but you know that we know what you’re saying there. You’re talking about Nigel Farage. You’re talking about Tommy Robinson. You’re talking about people like me.”

His voice rising with emotion, Wootton recalled the terror of that day. He had been on the London Underground that morning, en route to pick up a tuxedo for a now-cancelled event. “At Earl’s Court, the panic swept through the tube. A conductor said, ‘You’ve got to get off now. There’s been a bomb.’ I ran. I remember everything. The chaos. The smoke. The confusion.”

Wootton wasn’t just a commentator—he was a survivor. And like many, he felt betrayed.

“What I’m not proud of,” he continued, “is the fact that 20 years later, we are still being gaslit by our leaders—including King Charles today. We’re not seeking to divide. We’re trying to talk about the real problem.”

The real problem, according to Wootton and his guests? Islamist extremism—and the government and media’s refusal to name it.

“The Men Who Tried to Blow Us to Pieces”

In graphic detail, Wootton recounted the horror of the morning of July 7, 2005. Four young British men—homegrown Islamist extremists—detonated bombs on three underground trains and a double-decker bus. Fifty-two civilians were murdered in cold blood. Dozens were decapitated, dismembered, or crushed in pitch-black tunnels. Survivors had to crawl over body parts. Some waited over an hour for medical help.

Yet despite the horror, Wootton argues, British society remains unwilling to confront the ideological root cause.

“This wasn’t a power surge. This wasn’t a freak accident. This was a coordinated Islamist attack by people born and radicalized in this country. And two decades later, we’re still afraid to talk about it.”

The Line That Crossed the Line

For Alex Phillips, the King’s message was more than a misstep—it was a coded rebuke to anyone brave enough to speak up.

“Islamism is terrorism,” she declared. “We’re not talking about peaceful Muslims. We’re talking about those who believe it’s okay to take little white girls as sex slaves, who want to blow up arenas, who radicalize children. And instead of addressing it, we’re told we’re the problem.”

Phillips warned that new legislation on so-called “Islamophobia” could criminalize discussion and silence critics. “At that point,” she warned, “it’s over. Especially for women. Especially for gay men. We won’t even be allowed to speak about the threat.”

A Nation Gaslit

Charlie DS, representing a younger generation, added a chilling data point: “Forty percent of British Muslims aged 16 to 24 say they support Sharia law. That’s not integration. That’s radicalization.”

He pointed out that the four 7/7 bombers were all under 30—young men born and raised in the UK. “This issue hasn’t gotten better,” he said. “It’s gotten worse. And no one dares admit it.”

In an alarming moment, Phillips cited intelligence sources warning of a potential shift in terrorist tactics: incendiary attacks, coordinated arson, attacks on infrastructure. “It wouldn’t take 40,000,” she said, referring to the number of individuals reportedly on the UK’s Islamist watchlist. “Just a few hundred, armed with petrol bombs, could overwhelm our cities.”

She reminded viewers that only 3,000 Hamas militants paralyzed Israel on October 7, 2023. “We are not prepared,” she said flatly. “We are sleepwalking into disaster.”

A Deafening Silence

What made the fury explode was not just the King’s carefully worded statement—it was his absence. Charles did not attend the memorial at St. Paul’s Cathedral, sending Sophie, Duchess of Edinburgh, in his place. The Palace cited “convention”—monarchs traditionally only mark the 25th anniversary—but to many, it felt like a snub.

“It just feels like he doesn’t care,” said one caller. “We’re grieving. We’re terrified. And our King is talking about unity instead of evil.”

Meanwhile, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage was the only major political figure to explicitly link 7/7 to Islamist ideology, calling for a hard stance against extremism. Wootton praised him—and ominously hinted that “mass deportations” might be the only solution.

The Final Hour?

For many viewers and listeners, the segment wasn’t just a rant—it was a reckoning. A wake-up call. A cry for truth over tolerance, action over appeasement.

“The 11th hour,” Phillips warned, “may have already passed. When even our monarch won’t say the word—Islamist—we are lost.”

And as the show faded out, Wootton looked into the camera with a chilling final appeal:

“Your Majesty, we beg you—no more platitudes. No more coded statements. Name the threat. Honor the victims. Protect your people. Or history will not forgive you.”