A royal commentator claimed that Meghan Markle would not have been satisfied with royal life as she always “wanted to be a superstar”.
A royal experts claimed Meghan would not have enjoyed living the life of a Royal Family member.
Meghan Markle always had plans to become a “superstar” and would not have been happy living the “quiet” life of a Royal Family member, a royal commentator has claimed.
Before she and Prince Harry left the Firm, there was talk of them becoming “half-in half-out” royals – supporting the late Queen but also working and earning independent salaries.
This drew comparisons between Meghan and Princess Beatrice and Eugenie, who both have normal jobs as well as attending royal events.
However, royal commentator Jane Barr claimed that Meghan would not have been satisfied with this strategy, as she always “wanted to be a superstar” and had her sights set on bigger things.
She wrote in the From Berkshire to Buckingham newsletter: “She [Meghan] would not have been happy with the ultimately quiet or truly independent/non-royal lives that William and Harry’s cousins actually live.
The couple could have adopted a similar strategy to Beatrice and Eugenie.
Looking back to Megxit, Harry was not just the grandson of the Queen, the same relationship all his cousins had to the sovereign, he was the son of the future King.”
Barr also claimed that Prince Harry had become a “spare” in the Royal Family, creating a feeling of bitterness and adding to his list of reasons to leave the family with Meghan.
After years of being treated as a senior member of the Firm, the Duke became “bitter”, according to Barr, before leaving the UK permanently and settling in the US.
She continued: “William and Harry were — from birth — preeminent royals, while their cousins, although celebrated, surely, began as secondary royals and only continued to fade as the years went by.
“Harry seems so bitter about being the spare, but he has always been quite senior to his cousins, and treated accordingly.”
Prince Harry and Meghan were untimately not allowed to adopt the “half-in half-out” strategy by Queen Elizabeth, which their fans slammed as unfair, maintaining that it could’ve worked.
News
Here’s How Kim Kardashian Is Technically Royal (And Whether It Matters). She might be reality TV royalty, but is Kim Kardashian ACTUAL royalty too?
HIGHLIGHTS The Kardashians are related to Scottish royalty through their mother, Kris Jenner, and can potentially claim royal status. Despite their royal heritage, Kim Kardashian doesn’t seem…
The Loss Of Princess Diana’s Royal Title May Have Led Directly To Her Death
There has always been a lot of speculation as to how Diana’s death could have been prevented and this is one of them. Via: Instar HIGHLIGHTS Key…
Did The Royal Family Make A Fortune Off Of Queen Elizabeth II’s Death?
Queen Elizabeth II’s passing had a significant impact on the Royal Family’s financial stability, income, and public support. Via: TheThings HIGHLIGHTS Queen Elizabeth II’s passing has had…
Meghan Markle’s Career Was Even Controlled By The Royal Family During Her Last Season On ‘Suits’
The royals got involved with Meghan Markle’s career in an interesting way before she ultimately left ‘Suits.’ via: instar HIGHLIGHTS Meghan Markle’s relationship with Prince Harry began…
King Charles Once Broke Royal Protocol (And The Law) And Got A Security Guard Fired
King Charles once misbehaved in public, causing a security guard to lose his job. via: instar HIGHLIGHTS King Charles attended boarding school at Gordonstoun to “toughen up”…
Why Was Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor Still Given The Title Of Princess After Her Parents Left The Royal Family?
Fans were left confused about how Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s daughter was given the title of princess since the couple left the royal family. via: Instar…
End of content
No more pages to load