Recent rumors have taken the royal community by storm, suggesting that Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, may not be the biological son of King Charles III but rather the offspring of King Juan Carlos I of Spain. This sensational claim has generated widespread speculation, capturing the attention of media outlets and royal watchers around the world.

The rumors emerged from various online forums and social media platforms, where conspiracy theories often gain traction without any substantial evidence. Supporters of this theory point to supposed historical connections between Princess Diana and King Juan Carlos during the early 1980s. They argue that the two shared a close friendship, alleging that their relationship may have crossed the boundaries of mere friendship.

Physical resemblances between Prince William and King Juan Carlos have also fueled this speculation. Some observers have noted similarities in their facial features, particularly their strong jawlines and dark hair. However, such claims lack scientific basis and have been met with skepticism from royal experts who emphasize that family resemblances can often be coincidental.

Royal historians have been quick to dismiss these allegations, reiterating that Prince William is the legitimate son of King Charles and the late Princess Diana. “The lineage of Prince William is well-documented,” said one royal historian. “These rumors are nothing more than baseless speculation that can undermine the integrity of the royal family.”

Despite the lack of credible evidence supporting these claims, the speculation has gained momentum, with various tabloids running stories and opinion pieces exploring the supposed implications of such a revelation. The British royal family has traditionally been a subject of intense public interest, and any gossip involving their personal lives tends to attract significant media coverage.

In response to the rumors, close associates of Prince William have come forward to defend him. Friends describe the allegations as “ridiculous” and “harmful,” asserting that the Duke remains deeply connected to his family. They emphasize that William’s commitment to his royal duties and his strong bond with his parents are irrefutable.

While the palace has opted to remain silent on the matter, the ongoing speculation highlights the challenges that modern royals face in a world dominated by social media and sensationalism. As Prince William continues to fulfill his royal responsibilities, many hope that this rumor will dissipate, allowing him and his family to focus on their public duties and charitable endeavors without the burden of unfounded claims.

In a heartfelt and shocking revelation, King Charles III reportedly confessed to his eldest son, Prince William, the truth behind the tragic accident that claimed the life of Princess Diana. As he lay on his deathbed, Charles expressed remorse for his past actions and the impact they had on his family, particularly concerning the circumstances surrounding Diana’s untimely demise.

Sources close to the royal family revealed that during a private moment, Charles took William’s hand and, with a heavy heart, said, “I’m sorry, my son. I’m sorry for your mother.” The admission reportedly left Prince William both stunned and emotional. For years, speculation and conspiracy theories have surrounded Diana’s fatal car crash in Paris in 1997, and many have sought to understand the royal family’s role in her life and death.

The king’s confession has reignited public interest in the events leading up to the tragic accident. It is well-documented that Diana faced immense pressure and scrutiny during her marriage to Charles, which ultimately led to their separation in 1996. The aftermath of the divorce saw the media hounding Diana relentlessly, contributing to her feelings of isolation. As such, Charles’s admission has raised questions about the royal family’s responsibility in protecting her and their possible involvement in the relentless media attention that plagued her.

Royal insiders have expressed concern over the emotional toll this revelation could take on William, who has always been protective of his mother’s legacy. For years, he has worked to honor her memory through charitable efforts, focusing on issues that were close to her heart, such as mental health and humanitarian work. This shocking confession, however, could complicate that mission.

In light of these recent events, public sentiment is mixed. Many sympathize with King Charles’s remorse, recognizing the heavy burden he carries as both a father and a monarch. Others, however, question whether this confession is merely an attempt to absolve himself of guilt in the wake of his family’s tragic history.

As the world watches, this revelation serves as a reminder of the complexities within the royal family and the lasting impact of Princess Diana’s life and death. For Prince William, the challenge now lies in reconciling his father’s past with his own efforts to forge a brighter future for his family and the monarchy. Ultimately, the king’s confession may not only reshape the narrative surrounding Diana’s legacy but also redefine the bond between father and son in their final days together.

In a stunning late-night phone call, King Charles III summoned his estranged son, Prince Harry, back to England to share a shocking revelation about the tragic death of Princess Diana, which has remained hidden for two decades. The urgency of the call highlights the gravity of the situation and the deep familial ties that still exist, despite their strained relationship.

Sources close to the royal family have revealed that King Charles wanted to address rumors and clarify the circumstances surrounding Diana’s untimely death in 1997. For years, conspiracy theories have circulated, suggesting that her death was not merely a tragic accident but rather the result of a more sinister plot. During the phone call, King Charles reportedly expressed a sense of urgency, stating, “Harry, we need to talk about your mother. It’s time to reveal the truth.”

The request for Harry to return comes amidst growing public interest and scrutiny regarding the royal family’s past. As new documentaries and discussions arise about the events leading to Diana’s death, many believe that the time has come for the monarchy to confront these long-standing allegations. King Charles’s intentions appear to be rooted in a desire for transparency and healing within the family, particularly for Prince Harry, who has been vocal about his mother’s legacy and the impact her death had on his life.

Upon his return, Prince Harry is expected to meet with King Charles privately to discuss the details of the revelation. Friends of Harry have indicated that he has always sought clarity about the events surrounding his mother’s death, and this conversation could be an opportunity for both healing and reconciliation between father and son. “Harry has been searching for answers for years,” said a family friend. “This is a chance for them to connect and confront the past together.”

As news of the call spreads, public reactions are mixed. While some express hope that this could lead to a renewed bond between Harry and the royal family, others are skeptical about the implications of Charles’s revelation. The idea that Diana’s death may not have been an accident could reignite a media frenzy, leading to further scrutiny of the royal family’s past.

As the story unfolds, all eyes will be on King Charles and Prince Harry. The discussions that take place in the coming days could potentially reshape their relationship and alter the narrative surrounding Princess Diana’s legacy forever. It remains to be seen how this shocking admission will impact not only the family dynamics but also the broader public perception of the British monarchy.

Amidst the swirling saga surrounding Meghan Markle, one figure has emerged with an aura of controversy and intrigue – Doria Ragland, Meghan’s mother. Hailing from relative obscurity, Doria’s journey has been shrouded in mystery and speculation as she navigated the inner circles of royalty, captivating the public’s imagination.

Doria’s prominence grew during Meghan’s courtship with Prince Harry, sparking intense scrutiny and conjecture. Critics cite Doria’s early warnings about the potential racial dynamics within the royal family as prophetic, stirring tension and discord. From being a previously unknown figure in high society, she suddenly assumed a pivotal role, seemingly prepared to confront the establishment head-on.

Doria’s background, modest and reportedly lacking formal education, contrasts sharply with her acute understanding of royal protocols and dynamics – a fact that has cast doubt on her motives and foresight among skeptics. How could someone from such humble origins grasp the intricacies of royal life with such apparent ease, they question, casting aspersions on her true intentions.

Accusations of opportunism and exploitation have surfaced, amidst claims of Doria’s involvement in legal disputes and financial instability. Reports allude to a past marked by legal battles and financial woes, alongside narratives of familial estrangement and personal adversity, further tarnishing her image.

Shadowy criminal allegations and speculations tied to a complex history of legal entanglements, including accusations of fraud and tax evasion, have only added to the intrigue surrounding Doria. While the details remain speculative, these allegations paint a picture of a troubled past, complicating Doria’s efforts to redefine herself amidst her newfound prominence.Doria’s professional pursuits took an unexpected turn as the CEO of Loving Kindness Senior Care Management, a business reportedly founded with support from Meghan’s legal advisers. Operating on a cash-only basis and providing services like power of attorney, her business model has raised eyebrows, with critics expressing concerns over potential risks to vulnerable clients given her alleged history and the unconventional nature of financial transactions.

Questions persist about Doria’s connections and credibility, with critics arguing that her association with the British royal family through Meghan’s marriage to Prince Harry lends her an undeserved aura of legitimacy. Issues surrounding integrity and transparency continue to overshadow her attempts to navigate the intricacies of royal life.

The narrative surrounding Doria Ragland highlights broader themes of privilege, power, and scrutiny within royal circles. It challenges notions of familial loyalty and personal integrity, inviting scrutiny into the motives and actions of those thrust into the spotlight.

Meanwhile, the public’s fascination with the Meghan Markle saga has only intensified with the latest exposé from Lady Colin Campbell. Her book, “Meghan and Harry: The Real Story,” reads like a gripping chapter of a scandalous mystery novel, replete with aristocratic connections and infamous dinner parties.

Lady Campbell’s exploration of Doria Ragland’s past paints a portrait darker than a stormy London night. The book portrays Doria as an absentee mother who reappeared at pivotal moments in Meghan’s life, leaving questions about her earlier absence. Lady Campbell hints at Doria’s mysterious past, suggesting ties to legal troubles and potentially criminal activities, though she stops short of fully substantiating these claims.

 

The public’s appetite for juicy royal drama has only grown, and Lady Campbell’s book has once again ignited a firestorm of interest. Readers are captivated by the unfolding saga, eager to uncover the truth behind Doria’s role in Meghan’s life and her sudden prominence within royal circles.

As the controversy continues to unfold, Thomas Markle and Meghan maintain a conspicuous silence, adding further layers of intrigue to the unfolding mystery. The public is left to speculate on the veracity of the allegations, the motives behind the key players, and the true nature of Doria Ragland’s connection to the royal family.

The enigma surrounding Doria Ragland has become a central thread in the tapestry of the Meghan Markle saga, captivating the public’s imagination and sparking intense debates. Her journey from obscurity to the heart of the royal establishment has been marked by whispers of scandal, accusations of impropriety, and a tangled web of speculation.

Meghan Markle has reportedly had a contentious reaction after learning of her alleged firing from the renowned talent agency WME (William Morris Endeavor), overseen by Ari Emanuel, one of Hollywood’s most influential power brokers. According to insiders, Meghan was blindsided by the decision, sparking an intense argument with Emanuel and leading to speculations about her standing in Hollywood.

Earlier this year, Meghan joined WME, a move seen as a strategic step to establish her brand within the entertainment industry outside of the royal framework. Her signing with WME included potential projects in film, television, and digital media, focusing on her initiatives related to mental health, social issues, and public speaking. However, following various Hollywood controversies and lackluster reception to previous ventures, Emanuel and WME reportedly made the call to end their professional relationship with Meghan.

Upon hearing of the decision, sources close to the agency report that Meghan did not take the news lightly. In a reportedly tense exchange, Meghan challenged Emanuel’s reasoning, arguing her perspective on the ongoing projects she had hoped to push forward under WME’s guidance. Witnesses suggest that the discussion grew heated, with Meghan feeling that the termination was unfair and that she was not given sufficient time to solidify her presence in Hollywood.

The decision by WME has fueled speculation in the entertainment industry about Meghan’s direction and the level of support for her ambitions in Hollywood. Meghan had been gearing up for a range of initiatives, and sources say she had already begun developing partnerships and concepts she believed would resonate with her growing audience. The unexpected dismissal from WME has left some wondering what her next steps will be and whether she will attempt to secure representation with another agency or pursue independent projects.Hollywood insiders have noted that Meghan’s ties to the royal family have presented both advantages and challenges in her career shift. While her status as the Duchess of Sussex draws significant public interest, navigating the entertainment industry while balancing a complex royal image has proven to be a delicate task. As Meghan continues to refine her brand, fans and critics alike are watching closely to see how she adapts to the setbacks and whether she will find new ways to assert her influence in Hollywood.

The 2024 Sio Film Festival was intended to mark Meghan Markle’s triumphant return to the spotlight after years of staying out of the public eye following her dramatic departure from the British royal family.

Invited as a special guest, Meghan was slated to introduce a documentary she had produced, a high-profile event meant to reignite her fading star power in Hollywood. However, the evening took an unexpected and shocking turn. Before Meghan could make her grand entrance on the red carpet, security guards physically removed her, creating a startling scene. Gasps of disbelief rippled through the crowd as the former actress was unceremoniously escorted off the premises.

The incident, broadcast live on global television, quickly became a hot topic in Tinseltown. While Meghan’s supporters condemned the event as a disrespectful act, her critics saw it as evidence that Hollywood had turned its back on her.

So, what led to this debacle? Meghan Markle’s star has dimmed in recent years. Her 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey, in which she and Prince Harry made explosive allegations against the British royal family, sparked widespread controversy. Although some expressed sympathy for Meghan, others perceived her as opportunistic and ungrateful. Subsequent projects, such as the Spotify podcast with Harry, failed to garner the same attention.

Hollywood insiders have noted that Meghan’s relationships with key industry power players have deteriorated. The Duchess had hoped that her royal status would open doors in the entertainment industry, but many now view her as more trouble than she’s worth. “There’s a sense that Meghan is more hassle than she’s worth,” said one anonymous film executive. “She brings a lot of baggage, and studios prefer less drama.”

Given her waning influence, Meghan’s invitation to the Sio Film Festival was seen as a last-ditch effort to regain public attention. Her documentary on the refugee crisis was a prestigious project that could have rehabilitated her image. However, things went awry from the moment Meghan arrived in Sio. Sources reveal that Meghan made several demanding requests of the festival organizers, including a private jet, a luxury hotel suite, and an entourage of personal assistants.

“It was just too much for us to accommodate,” remarked one festival representative. Tensions escalated on the red carpet when security guards suddenly surrounded Meghan, restraining her and leading her away from the event. Witnesses reported that Meghan was visibly upset, shouting, “You can’t do this to me! I’m the Duchess of Sussex!” But her protests were to no avail.

The fallout from the Sio incident has been significant. Festival organizers issued a terse statement citing security concerns as the reason for Meghan’s removal but did not provide further details. The incident has sparked controversy, with some accusing Hollywood’s elite of orchestrating the event to humiliate Meghan.

“This was a clear attempt to publicly shame Meghan and knock her down a peg,” said one royal commentator. Others argue that Meghan’s behavior and security demands made her presence a logistical nightmare. “They had to do what they had to do to maintain order and keep everyone safe,” said one film critic. “Meghan brought this on herself with her outrageous requests.”

For Meghan, the aftermath has been harsh. The incident has become a viral sensation, with memes and jokes circulating widely on social media. Late-night TV hosts have seized on the story, and even some of Meghan’s former Hollywood allies have distanced themselves from her. The Sio debacle has solidified the perception of Meghan as persona non grata in Tinseltown. With her reputation tarnished and her celebrity status waning, Meghan faces a tough road ahead if she hopes to regain her footing in the unforgiving world of Hollywood. As one industry insider put it, “Meghan wanted a big comeback, but instead, she got the ultimate humiliation. Hollywood has spoken, and the message is clear: they don’t want her here.” Only time will tell if Meghan can stage a comeback, but for now, the Duchess of Sussex finds herself on the outs in the very town where she once dreamed of rebuilding her post-royal life.

DIVORCED!! Prince William Finally Agrees to SPLIT from Kate After SHOCKING Threat from the Middletons!

Prince William has reportedly agreed to a separation from Catherine, Princess of Wales, following a shocking ultimatum from her family, the Middletons. This unexpected development has sent shockwaves through the monarchy and raised questions about the future of one of the most admired couples in the world.

According to insider reports, tensions have been simmering between the royal family and the Middletons for some time. The catalyst for this dramatic split appears to be a controversial threat made by Carole Middleton, Catherine’s mother, who allegedly expressed her discontent with the way William has treated her daughter. Sources suggest that Carole, known for her strong opinions and protective nature, felt compelled to step in when it became clear that William and Catherine’s marriage was under strain.

“Carole made it clear that if William couldn’t commit to supporting Catherine fully, she would not hesitate to pull back her support,” said a close source. “This ultimatum caught William off guard, and he realized he had to make a choice.”

 

 

Caught between duty to the crown and loyalty to his family, Prince William found himself in a difficult position. The pressure of royal responsibilities combined with the expectations of the Middleton family created an unbearable strain on the couple’s relationship. Friends of the prince reveal that he has been grappling with the weight of these expectations, leading him to consider the unimaginable: a separation from Catherine.

“This isn’t just a marital issue; it’s a family affair,” explained a royal expert. “William has always prioritized his family, but the Middletons are asserting themselves in a way that’s making him question his role as both a husband and a future king.”

Meanwhile, sources close to Catherine say she is heartbroken by the unfolding drama. Known for her grace and poise, the Princess of Wales has reportedly been struggling with the tension between her husband and her family. Friends have noted that she has been visibly upset, torn between her loyalty to William and her desire to maintain peace with her family.

Michael Buerk described the late Liam Payne as a ‘drugged up, faded, boy band singer’

Michael Buerk has faced a backlash after he described the late Liam Payne as a ‘drugged-up, faded, boy band singer’.

The One Direction musician, 31, died after he fell 45ft to his death from a Buenos Aires hotel balcony on October 16.

But Buerk, 78, a former newsreader and Moral Maze presenter, took exception to the BBC’s coverage of the tragic death.

Asked on the Radio 4’s Today programme about how foreign journalism had changed, he said: ‘There was more of an appetite for seriousness. It was only last week this programme decided that the most important thing that had happened in the world was that a drugged up, faded, boy band singer had fallen off a balcony.

‘Even the 10 O’clock News, which is normally good on these things, thought it was the second most important thing that happened in the world.’

The insensitive comments faced criticism from listeners .

Jenny Landreth wrote on X: ‘Blimey. Michael Buerk on #R4today expressing his surprise that the death of a ‘drugged-up fading boyband member’ led the news. He seemed so … disdainful.’

Former One Direction singer Liam Payne was found dead after the 31 year old fell from the balcony of his third-floor room at a hotel in Buenos Aires, Argentina

One Direction’s Harry Styles, Niall Horan, Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik and Liam Payne in 2010

She added: ‘There was no need for him to be so dismissive, it just felt sneery.’

Stand-up comic and novelist Jenny Eclair simply replied: ‘Urgh’.

Another listener wrote: ‘As soon as I heard this on BBC Radio 4 I was sure Michael Buerk would be trending unfavorably.’

One critic of Mr Buerk said that he was ‘stuck in the past’, and compared the journalist to ‘a dinosaur’.

But the former foreign correspondent’s comments were defended by some.

Richard Butterworth wrote on social media: ‘Thanks, Mr Buerk, for putting into perspective on R4 the hyperbole over Liam Payne. While not wishing to speak ill of the dead, or belittle the grief of the deceased’s young followers, the media overkill attending Payne’s misadventure at such a momentous time was ridiculous.’

Mr Buerk, who took part in I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here in 2014, made the controversial remarks on the 40th anniversary of his Ethiopian famine reports.

Asked about the change in television news, he told presenter Amol Rajan: ‘We didn’t have the 24-hour news cycle, which means reporters spend a lot more of their time on rooftops opinionizing rather than finding out what the story is.’

‘I think there was a wider agenda and wider appetite. If you look at the news these days, they seem to be hammering away at the same half dozen stories. While whole continents go unmentioned for months after months.’

The 78-year-old former newsreader and Moral Maze presenter took exception to the BBC ‘s coverage of the tragic death

Droves of fans arrived at the scene in Buenos Aires in the wake of Liam Payne’s death

Shocked fans gather behind a cordon outside the Casa Sur Hotel in Buenos Aires

Payne rose to fame as a member of One Direction, one of the most popular boy bands in history. The group was formed on reality competition series The X Factor in 2010, where Payne, Harry Styles, Niall Horan, Zayn Malik and Louis Tomlinson each auditioned as solo acts before joining the five-piece group.

The singer was pronounced dead on October 16, after emergency services responded to a hotel manager’s call about an ‘aggressive man who could be under the influence of drugs or alcohol.’

The final days of the One Direction star will be explored in a Hulu documentary which will air later today.

The special, titled One Direction: Liam Payne’s Final Days, will feature interviews with former X Factor contestants including Mary Byrne.

Tributes have flooded in for the late singer and vigils have been held across the world in London, Glasgow, Paris, Sydney and New York to celebrate his life.

Earlier this week, Argentine police and prosecutors investigating the tragedy said they were treating the star’s death as ‘inconclusive’.

Preliminary results from toxicology tests of Mr Payne’s remains found traces of cocaine, benzodiazepine, crack cocaine and ‘pink cocaine’ — a combination of methamphetamine, ketamine and MDMA.

While tests on the substances — white powder, traces of chemical crystals and prescription medicines — found at his suite at the boutique hotel continue, results from a post mortem of his body have been completed.

It determined that the singer died instantly from multiple injuries after falling 45ft from the third floor.

Argentine news website Infobae reported: ‘A forensic study carried out in Liam’s body determined the presence of cocaine.

‘A test carried out by the [Buenos Aires] City Police on the substance found on Liam’s room table have not confirmed the white powder as cocaine.

Forensic teams combing the Casa Sur Hotel in Buenos Aires where Payne fell to his death

Tearful fans outside the Buenos Aires hotel console each other and connect on social media

Liam Payne performs at Royal Randwick Racecourse in Sydney on October 13, 2018

Fans place candles outside the the Casa Sur Hotel during a vigil for the star

‘A second test is to follow to determine the nature of the drug.’

Mr Payne’s body will not be released to his father Geoff Payne until all examinations have been concluded, according to Argentine judicial sources.

Mr Payne Snr is expected to stay in Buenos Aires until he can bring back his son’s body in person.

A funeral is expected to take place in Britain in November.

Meanwhile, more than 65,000 people have signed a petition calling for new legislation, known as ‘Liam’s Law,’ to protect the mental health of artists in the music industry following the death of Liam Payne.

The proposed law would mandate regular mental health check-ups, sufficient rest periods and the availability of mental health professionals on set, as well as ongoing support throughout an artist’s career.

One of Liam Payne’s final selfies in Buenos Aires was captioned: ‘Lovely day in Argentina’

Fans of One Direction and Liam Payne grieve together outside the hotel where he fell to his death

Seeking solace in one another, a crowd of devastated fans gathered after the news broke

The petition, launched anonymously on October 18 by a fan named Day KV on Change.org, states: ‘The entertainment industry must be held accountable and take responsibility for the well-being of its artists.

‘Resultant issues such as stress, anxiety, depression, substance misuse and even suicide are alarmingly high.

‘According to research, performers are 2-3 times more likely to suffer from these issues compared to the general population.’

‘Such a law would necessitate regular mental health check-ups, adequate rest periods, and the presence of mental health professionals on-set, including any ongoing support during their career.

‘It will ensure a healthier, safer, and more conducive working environment for artists to cultivate their talents reducing psychological distress.

‘This would also include early interventions to protect and minimise before it’s too late. It adds: ‘Your signature could be a lifeline for these talented individuals, contributing to a larger movement of mental health awareness and care in industries worldwide.

IT HAS been two years since Meghan Markle said ‘I do’ to Prince Harry in her ivory Givenchy dress by Clare Waight Keller.

And while some were surprised at her choice it was the Queen who was most taken aback according to royal sources.Your info will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

 

3

The Queen was apparently surprised to see that Meghan Markle wore white on her wedding day according to insidersCredit: AFP and licensors
Speaking to the Mail on Sunday, insiders claimed that the monarch was surprised that Meghan Markle wore a pristine white gown despite having previously been married.

Speaking to the publication they said: “The Queen is said to have expressed surprise that Meghan, a divorcee, wore quite such a white dress for her wedding.”

Traditionally a white wedding dress is symbolic of a woman’s “purity” on her wedding day, and represents the bride’s virginity.

With Meghan having previously been married Her Majesty may have expected her to opt for an off-white gown.

Meghan wore an ivory silk gown by Givenchy’s Clare Waight KellerCredit: Getty – Pool

3

As Meghan had already been married, the Queen might have expected her to opt for an off-whiteCredit: Getty – Contributor
The Duchess of Sussex was previously married to Trevor Engelson having tied the knot on September 10, 2011, at the Jamaica Inn in Ocho Rios, Jamaica.

The wedding was a four-day affair and pictures have since shown drinking games on the beach in the run-up to the big day.

The couple separated just two years after their wedding and were divorced in August 2013, citing “irreconcilable differences”.

In other royal news, Meghan and Harry’s biographer has shared candid snaps from their wedding day to celebrate their anniversary.

And Meghan Markle loved learning martial arts her former trainer has revealed and she chatted to him in Spanish.

Plus Meghan Markle and Prince Harry provided 250,000 meals for struggling Brits during lockdown with wedding donation.

The woman who thinks Meghan Markle has the ‘worst judgement’: Princess Diana’s former confidante claims Duchess of Sussex is ‘addicted to drama’ and ‘didn’t understand’ her role in the Royal Family

In the 27 years since Princess Diana’s passing, much has been written about the royal’s state of mind in her final months.

But few people were granted as close access to the late Princess of Wales as Tina Brown.

In July 1997, just two months before the tragic accident in Paris, the royal mother-of-two met the former Vanity Fair editor for lunch in New York with Anna Wintour.

Detailing their meeting in a personal essay for The New Yorker, Tina marvelled at the Princess’ ‘shrewd’ approach to public relations – an area she believes Meghan Markle is lacking in.

Earlier this month, the journalist appeared on The Ankler podcast – where she argued the Duchess of Sussex ‘has the worst judgement of anyone in the entire world’ and dubbed Megxit a ‘disaster’.

Pictured: Former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown, who had lunch with Princess Diana just two months before her death in 1997

Few people were granted as close access to the late Princess of Wales (pictured in New York in 1997) as Tina Brown

However, this isn’t the first time Tina has taken aim at the Duchess of Sussex in public.

In 2022, The Diana Chronicles author accused the former Suits actress of ‘not understanding’ how hard her mother-in-law had to work to become a ‘humanitarian superstar’.

In her book The Palace Papers, an insider told Tina that Meghan ‘hated every second’ of her Australia tour in 2018 and claimed the visit was ‘pointless’.

Months later, the influential editor also said the Duke and Duchess ‘completely underestimated’ what life without the ‘palace platform’ would be like – arguing that Meghan lacks a defined ‘brand’ and instead latches on the ‘Twitter cause of the moment’.

Here FEMAIL takes a look back at how Meghan Markle lost a potential ally in one of Princess Diana’s most influential friends.

Meghan wasn’t prepared to ‘work like a dog’ like Diana? 

Two years ago, Tina Brown released her book The Palace Papers – where she delved into the fall-out of Megxit.

While promoting the book, the author claimed that Meghan ‘didn’t understand her role’ in the Firm during an appearance on ITV’s Lorraine.

The Diana Chronicles author accused the former Suits actress (pictured) of ‘not understanding’ how hard her mother-in-law had to work to become a ‘humanitarian superstar’

Tina Brown argued in 2022 that argued that the Duchess did not recognise the ‘great deal of very humdrum assignments’ Diana (pictured) undertook on behalf of the Firm before she became the icon she remains today

According to Tina, Meghan looked to the example of Princess Diana and thought that she could follow the same path.

However, she argued that the Duchess did not recognise the ‘great deal of very humdrum assignments’ Diana undertook on behalf of the Firm before she became the icon she remains today.

‘I think that was her fundamental sense of misunderstanding of what was going to happen when she joined the Royal Family – she saw the palaces and Diana as this global humanitarian super star, but forgot that for 16 or 17 years Diana worked like a dog within the Royal Family doing a great deal of very humdrum assignments.

‘It was her charisma she brought to the job that made her so extraordinarily special.’

The author said the couple made ‘bad choices’ and could have left the royal family on far better terms if they weren’t as ‘hotheaded’ when they made the decision to step back from their roles as working royals.

Meghan Markle ‘hated every second’ of her Australia tour 

When the Sussexes (pictured) arrived in Australia in October 2018, thousands of Australians gathered to see them in the flesh (pictured, the pair on the Opera House steps in Sydney during the trip) – something Meghan struggled to grasp ‘the point’ of

Elsewhere in her book, Tina alleged that Meghan ‘hated every second’ of her Australia tour and labelled the visit ‘pointless’.

Despite the warm reception and a lively itinerary, Brown claims a Palace staffer told her that Meghan actually loathed the trip.

‘So, Meghan must have been thrilled with it all … right? No. She apparently hated every second of it,’ she wrote.

‘She didn’t understand why things were set up in that way. Instead of being excited when thousands of people showed up at the Opera House, it was very much like, ‘What’s the purpose? I don’t understand this’,’ a Palace employee told Brown.

The staffer said Meghan didn’t appear to grasp the ‘representational role’ of the British monarchy when they toured, adding she was more interested in ’causes she wanted to spotlight’.

Despite the warm reception and a lively itinerary, Brown claims Meghan actually loathed the trip (Pictured: Meghan greeting the public outside of the Opera House)

The staffer said Meghan didn’t appear to grasp the ‘representational role’ of the British monarchy when they toured, adding she was more interested in ’causes she wanted to spotlight’ (Pictured: Meghan and Harry greeting the public outside of the Opera House)

Brown’s claims are supported in an article printed in The Times in 2021, which asserted that Meghan found it ‘silly’ when people crowded to see the Sussexes when they arrived in Sydney.

‘What are they all doing here? It’s silly,’ she reportedly said to her team. A source said that she simply ‘didn’t get it’.

The Sussexes completed 75 engagements in 16 days across Australia, New Zealand, Fiji and Tonga during the whirlwind tour – all while Meghan was in the early stages of her first pregnancy.

They were often pictured having intimate conversations, embracing fans or receiving numerous gifts from admirers during their time Down Under.

Brown claims in her book that one of the main things Meghan took away from the tour was her and Harry’s unrecognised importance in the royal hierarchy.

‘It was head-turning for Meghan to experience the full-throttle motorcade-purring, outrider-vrooming, crowd-roaring adulation of a popular young royal on a tour planned to the last teacup by the Palace machine.

‘Meghan seemed to interpret the success as a call for Brand Sussex to be elevated in the Palace hierarchy.’

However, Meghan reportedly felt ‘snubbed’ of appreciation by the Royal Family after the couple returned to the UK.

When they did arrive home, word soon spread that all was not well within the palace, including rumours of a rift between brothers and a falling out between Meghan and Kate Middleton.

Then in 2020, Meghan and Harry announced they were stepping down as senior working members of the royal family, and were later stripped of any remaining titles and patronages they had.

Meghan Markle is ‘addicted to drama’ 

Speaking to the Telegraph, the expert said the pair can’t stop creating dramatic scenes wherever they go – claiming they appeared to be ‘addicted to drama’

Appearing on the New York Times podcast Sway, Tina Brown also claimed that Megxit was a ‘disaster for both sides’ and said the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are ‘addicted to drama’.

Tina said the couple made ‘bad choices’ and could have left the Royal Family on far better terms if they weren’t as ‘hotheaded’.

She said: ‘I actually think there is a Harry-shaped hole in the royal family now. And Harry was beloved, actually, by the British people. And people adored Meghan when she came into the mix.

‘So it was actually very, very sad for everybody that it went so wrong because they actually need Harry and Meghan now.

The former Vanity Fair editor claimed that Harry and Meghan are ‘addicted to drama’ – and says one day the Duke will ‘wake up’ and realise he’s living in Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop.

Speaking to the Telegraph, the expert said the pair can’t stop creating dramatic scenes wherever they go – claiming they appeared to be ‘addicted to drama’. And she warned the duke appears to have been ‘completely and utterly taken over by Meghan and his whole personality has changed’.

‘I do question how it will end. ‘[Maybe] he’ll wake up and realise he’s living in Goop and he has to get the hell out, go down the pub and see his friends,’ she added.

Tina accuses Meghan of jumping on trendy charity causes

In an interview with The Washington Post, Tina claimed the Duke of Sussex is ‘in a much better spot’ than Meghan (pictured)  thanks to the Invictus Games

Speaking to the Washington Post, Tina Brown argued that the Duke and Duchess ‘completely underestimated’ what their life would be like without the ‘palace platform’.

In the interview, the editor claimed the Duke of Sussex is ‘in a much better spot’ than Meghan thanks to the Invictus Games.

The royal set up the sports events for injured servicemen and women in 2014.

Tina said: ‘That’s what his brand should be. Just forget everything but the Invictus Games. It’s authentic, he really was extremely impressive as a soldier.’

In contrast, Tina said Meghan has lacked focus since leaving the Firm and ‘doesn’t really have a brand’.

She continued: ‘You feel like she is grasping somewhat at whatever is the kind of Twitter [cause] of the moment.

‘It’s vaccinations. It’s Ukraine. It’s women’s rights. It’s, “hey – it’s my 40th birthday, let’s do a mentoring scheme.”

‘Nothing is really going anywhere for Meghan.’

Meghan Markle is ‘flawless at getting it all wrong’ 

In 1997, Tina marvelled at the Princess’ ‘shrewd’ approach to public relations – something she believes Meghan Markle (pictured) is lacking

Earlier this month, Tina told Janice Min on The Ankler podcast that she believes Meghan Markle has the ‘worst’ judgement.

While promoting her new Substack newsletter Fresh Hell, Tina said: ‘The trouble with Meghan is that she has the worst judgment of anyone in the entire world.

‘She’s flawless about getting it all wrong,’ Brown ranted. ‘All of her ideas are total crap, unfortunately.’

Princess Diana’s biographer and the author of The Palace Papers: Inside The House Of Windsor – The Truth And The Turmoil, described Harry as ‘the lamb to the slaughter in this situation.’

‘And he just sort of blindly followed her like a child, really,’ she said.

Brown posted her first Substack last week, describing the platform as a way to ‘unload my observations, rants, news obsessions, and human exchanges with the wildly eclectic cast of characters who populate my seething inbox.’ Her first post featured a scathing rant about Donald Trump and his run for president, describing her ‘mounting panic’ as the election date draws closer.

Brown is also no stranger to dishing dirt on the royal family. Her most recent book, The Palace Papers: Inside the House of Windsor, the Truth and the Turmoil, was published in 2022.

In 2007, she released biographical work The Diana Chronicles.

In 2022, the author said the couple made ‘bad choices’ and could have left the royal family on far better terms if they weren’t as ‘hotheaded’ when they made the decision to step back from their roles as working royals.

The author also labeled Prince Harry a ‘very impetuous man’ and revealed how Palace advisors ‘always thought he would leave’.

She said she was told it was because ‘he was so fragile, so combustible, he was so unhappy, frankly, in the constraints of the royal family’.

In the realm of royal fashion, few garments have captivated the world quite like Princess Diana’s wedding dress. Designed by Elizabeth Emanuel, the dress became a symbol of opulence, romance, and the fairy-tale nature of Diana’s marriage to Prince Charles….

Why Jon Bon Jovi & Dorothea Hurley’s Love Is Epic | Rumour Juice Jon Bon Jovi and Dorothea Hurley’s love story is nothing short of epic. It spans over four decades, filled with highs, lows, and a love that has…

At 62, Bon Jovi’s HEARTBREAKING Confession About His Marriage Jon Bon Jovi, at 62, is a name synonymous with rock and roll, timeless hits, and a steadfast marriage that has endured the test of time. But beneath the glamour and…

Jon Bon Jovi on the secret to marriage: ‘I’ve never lied about being a saint’ Jon Bon Jovi takes a sip from a bottle of water and flashes that unblemished smile. The stadium-filling rock star has somehow always managed to retain a…

Jon Bon Jovi Makes Sad Confession About His Marriage And We’re Stunned Jon Bon Jovi Makes Sad Confession About His Marriage And We’re Stunned Jon Bon Jovi has been a rock ‘n’ roll icon ever since his band, Bon Jovi,…