Author: quyen3

Surprising Turn: Meghan Markle Taken Aback as King Grants Lady Louise HRH Title and £1.25M Diadem for Her 20th Birthday

Among the array of developments in the royal landscape, a recent revelation has left Meghan Markle taken aback.

The King’s decision to bestow a coveted HRH title upon Lady Louise, coupled with a staggering £1.25 million diadem grant to mark her 20th birthday, has sparked intrigue and conversation.

Meghan Markle Astonished as King Grants Lady Louise HRH Title and £1.25M Diadem on 20th Birthday

Among the array of developments in the royal landscape, a recent revelation has left Meghan Markle taken aback. The King’s decision to bestow a coveted HRH title upon Lady Louise, coupled with a staggering £1.25 million diadem grant to mark her 20th birthday, has sparked intrigue and conversation.
In a remarkable twist, Lady Louise Windsor, the granddaughter of the Queen, finds herself at the center of royal discussions. With the shifting dynamics within the royal family – Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s withdrawal from official duties, and Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice embarking on their own marital journeys – an emerging vacancy for fresh and proactive royal figures seems apparent.

As Lady Louise Windsor approaches her 20th birthday this November, the anticipation surrounding her entrance into the realm of tiaras and royal traditions mounts. Unlike her elder cousins, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, who were adorned with tiaras only upon their wedding days, Lady Louise is poised to potentially challenge this customary timeline.

While there exists no strict guideline dictating the precise moment for a royal lady to don a tiara, a longstanding unspoken rule generally refrains younger royals from wearing them before the age of 18. This custom might soon see an exception as Lady Louise, known for her poise and sense of duty, steps onto the scene.

The decision to grant Lady Louise a tiara coincides with her mother Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh’s, regal journey. Sophie, having previously adorned the Amphibian Tiara, showcases how certain headpieces are bestowed upon royals, often carrying meaningful connections and tributes.

The Amphibian Tiara, utilizing the innovative amphibian technique, carries an estimated value of £1.25 million. Its significance lies not only in its artistic craftsmanship but also in its connection to the late Prince Philip, Sophie’s father-in-law. This tiara holds special resonance within the Duchess’s collection, representing both tradition and adaptation.

As Lady Louise edges closer to the landmark age of 20, royal experts speculate about her potential trajectory. Phil Dampier, a renowned royal commentator, heralds Lady Louise as the royal family’s “secret weapon.” With her 20th birthday heralding eligibility for an HRH title, Dampier envisions Lady Louise stepping into a role of increased responsibility. He hints at her becoming a pillar of support and service, shouldering the royal workload that her predecessors have fulfilled.Amidst the ongoing transformation within the royal family, the emergence of Lady Louise Windsor as a potential influential figure brings fresh energy and intrigue to the monarchy. As the tides of tradition and modernity converge, Lady Louise’s journey promises to be a captivating one.

Meghan Markle Rebuked by Earl Spencer: Althorp House Archie Ownership Controversy

 The legacy of Princess Diana continues to captivate the public, especially concerning the fate of her ancestral home, Althorp Estate. Whil…

The legacy of Princess Diana continues to captivate the public, especially concerning the fate of her ancestral home, Althorp Estate. While Prince Harry and Prince William inherited much of Diana’s wealth and personal items following her tragic death in 1997, one significant property remains outside their reach. Instead of passing to them, the 500-year-old Althorp Estate, where Diana spent her formative years, is set to be inherited by their cousin, Lewis Spencer, Viscount Althorp.This surprising decision stems from the longstanding British aristocratic practice of primogeniture, where estates like Althorp typically pass to the oldest male heir. Despite having three older sisters, Lewis, as the son of Diana’s brother Charles Spencer, is designated to inherit Althorp Estate. This historic property not only holds sentimental value as Diana’s childhood home but also serves as her final resting place, making its future caretaker a matter of both personal and historical significance.Lewis Spencer, known for his privacy and talents as an actor, is quietly preparing to assume his responsibilities for Althorp. He has already begun attending trustee meetings, demonstrating his commitment to managing the estate with the same dedication his family has shown for generations. Unlike his royal cousins, Lewis prefers to keep a low profile, focusing on his career and family responsibilities away from the public spotlight.

The Spencer family’s adherence to primogeniture tradition means that despite their royal status, Prince Harry and Prince William do not have a claim to Althorp Estate. This custom underscores the enduring customs within British aristocracy, where lineage and gender play significant roles in property inheritance.

Rumors circulating about Meghan Markle’s purported interactions with the Spencer family regarding Althorp Estate have added intrigue to this story. Reports claimed she sought to discuss the possibility of inheriting the estate with Prince Harry, only to be turned down by Charles Spencer. Another rumor suggested tensions arose during a visit to Diana’s grave, although these claims remain unconfirmed.As Althorp Estate’s future unfolds under Lewis Spencer’s stewardship, it symbolizes not only Diana’s personal legacy but also the ongoing influence of British aristocratic traditions. His dedication to preserving the estate’s history and managing its affairs reflects a commitment to honoring his aunt’s memory while upholding centuries-old customs of inheritance and stewardship.

Meghan Markle is not close with Princess Kate, with one royal expert suggesting the Duchess of Sussex was “jealous” of her sister-in-law.

Author Ingrid Seward said Meghan is likely to have been “incredibly envious” of Kate and the relationship she had with Prince Harry. In his debut memoir Spare, Harry gushed over Kate and described her as “the sister I’ve never had and always wanted”.

Ingrid said: “I think he just adored her [Kate] and he was always there, at Kensington Palace.” Now, relationship expert Louella Alderson has given some insight into why Meghan might have been envious of the Princess of Wales.

Prince Harry wrote kind things about his sister-in-law ( Image: Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty Images)

Speaking exclusively to The Mirror, she said: “It’s likely that Meghan felt a sense of competition with Kate. She seems to have a competitive streak and enjoys being in the spotlight.

“The constant media attention and comparisons being made between the two women may have added to the feelings of competition. No matter how secure and confident one may be, being compared to someone else on a regular basis can be challenging. Kate is adored by the public, which may have caused Meghan to feel like she had to live up to a certain standard.”

She suggested this sense of competition could have translated into jealousy. Louella suggested: “Seeing Harry’s close relationship with Kate could have triggered feelings of envy and insecurity for Meghan, making her feel like she had to compete for his attention and affection.”

Ranvir Singh breaks silence as former partner Giovanni Pernice ‘quits’ Strictly

Meghan Markle slammed over ‘laughable’ Princess Lilibet claim she said ‘with a straight face’

Amanda Abbington shares huge update as Giovanni Pernice ‘quits Strictly Come Dancing’

Louella added: “Constant competition and comparison with someone, especially when they are close family, can create a toxic dynamic and make it difficult for two people to have a genuine connection. It’s possible that Meghan’s jealousy towards Kate could have contributed to any deeper issues between the two sisters-in-law.

“In the end, it’s important to remember that both women are human and may have their own insecurities and vulnerabilities, which could have affected their relationship. There are likely many nuances and complexities to Kate and Meghan’s relationship that we may never fully understand, but it wouldn’t be surprising if jealousy played a role in their dynamic.”

Her comments come after Ingrid Seward told The Telegraph: “I think that Meghan must have been incredibly envious and then jealous of Kate. I heard Meghan actually thought she was going to be a princess and live in Windsor Castle. Instead, there’s William and Kate with this beautiful house, while they are stuck in Nottingham Cottage.”

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.

Wes Streeting has denied his plans to give new weight-loss jabs to unemployed people to help them back into work would result in a “dystopian future” where overweight people would be “involuntarily jabbed”.

The UK health secretary acknowledged that weight-loss drugs were not, on their own, the answer to the nation’s obesity crisis after he suggested this week that they could have a “monumental” impact on getting more people working.

However, he told BBC One’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg show that the latest generation of drugs, such as semaglutide or tirzepatide, could be “gamechanging” when it came to reversing the trends in obesity.

Streeting had said in an article for the Telegraph that “widening waistbands” were placing a burden on the NHS, and the drugs could be administered to people to get them back into employment and to ease costs to the health service.

The government has announced a £279m investment from Lilly – the world’s largest pharmaceutical company – with the deal expected to include real-world trials of weight loss jabs’ impact on unemployment.

“I don’t think the answer to obesity is simply weight-loss jabs but there is a lot of evidence that these jabs, combined with changes to diet and exercise, can help people to reduce their weight to reduce cardiovascular disease but also diabetes, which is gamechanging,” Streeting said.

“They’re not the only solution, and I don’t want to create a dependency culture. I’m not interested in some dystopian future where I wander round … involuntarily jabbing unemployed people who are overweight – that is not the agenda.

“If we can throw the trends we’re seeing on obesity into reverse, that’s better for the health of the nation … and the nation’s finances, because we’ve got to shift from treating sickness to actively preventing it. But that’s not a substitute for good diet and nutrition and exercise.”

In a round of broadcast interviews, Streeting said he had reached a deal on NHS funding with the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, but could not fix the problems of the last 14 years in one budget.

He stressed the need for reform as well as investment in the NHS, saying he was “conscious” that money spent on health was money that could not be spent in other areas. He appeared to suggest that hospitals would have to improve productivity to benefit from additional funding.

“Certainly the approach that the chancellor and I are taking is to link investment to reform,” he told the BBC. Asked whether hospital trusts would be penalised if they did not “play ball”, he added: “We definitely need to manage performance.

“I think it’s a quid pro quo. It’s my responsibility to give system leaders the tools to do the job, and that’s my responsibility as secretary of state, but it’s their responsibility to deliver.”

Streeting also said he was boosting the number of NHS appointments, but did not have the exact data needed to see whether the government was on course to meet its pledges. He reiterated that the NHS could not be fixed without also addressing the social care crisis.

Painful! Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Lose Inheritance Snub By King Charles For Allegedly Disrespecting the Monarchy

The Windsor family has been no stranger to drama over the years, but the latest chapter in the saga seems to have reached a new level of intensity. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, have found themselves on the receiving end of a harsh rebuke from the newly crowned King Charles III, and the consequences could be severe.

King Charles III has taken the unprecedented step of excluding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle from the royal inheritance, a move that underscores the deepening rift within the royal family.

This decision, driven by perceived disrespect towards the monarchy, has sparked significant controversy and placed considerable strain on the couple.

The tension between Harry, Meghan, and the royal family has been escalating since their decision to step back from royal duties in 2020.

 

King Charles III, in particular, was reportedly offended by the couple’s actions during the royal mourning period, viewing them as a challenge to his authority and the monarchy’s values.

The exclusion from an inheritance estimated at over £100 million has shocked both the public and media, highlighting the severe consequences of their strained relationship with the royal family.

This decision to redirect inheritance funds away from Harry and Meghan reflects ongoing tensions and appears to be a direct response to their public disclosures, including their high-profile interview with Oprah Winfrey.

 

The monarchy perceives these actions as betrayals that undermine the integrity and traditions of the royal institution.

The public reaction has been polarized, with some criticizing the king’s actions as vindictive and others supporting his stance on preserving the monarchy’s values.

The exclusion has left Harry and Meghan facing significant financial and emotional challenges.

 

The couple had relied on the inheritance for their charitable efforts and personal expenses, and this setback has intensified their feud with the royal family.

They reportedly feel hurt and betrayed, and speculation about possible legal action to challenge the king’s decision adds another layer of complexity to their strained relationship.

The ongoing drama within the House of Windsor continues to draw global attention, with many questioning the future dynamics between Harry, Meghan, and the royal institution.

The historic book belonged to Rev Richard Johnson, the first Christian Minister in Australia.  signed it in 1954 during the first visit of a reigning monarch to these shores. Handing it to Charles, the Archbishop said the Bible “represents a significant history of this church and nation”.

Using his own fountain pen the King signed the Bible before, possibly due to the effects of jet lag having landed in Sydney on Friday, turned to ask: “What day is it again?”

At the top of the prayer book page Charles signed this weekend was the late Princess of Wales’ signatures from their 1983 visit. The tour marked a turning point in their ill-fated relationship, with Charles understood to have been frustrated over the public’s incredible reaction for Diana.

After an hour-long service at St Thomas’ Church in northern Sydney, the royals made their way outside to loud cheers from the hundreds gathered on the lawn opposite the church.

A small group of anti-monarchy protestors also gathered outside under a large decolonise banner, but were drowned out by the well wishers. Charles said to one person: “It’s a beautiful day” as several people shouted: “We love you.”

One person said to the Queen “Hello, I hope your jet leg is getting better” before the pair spoke about the perils of long-haul travel.“We have it the same when we come to the UK,” Helen Hetrelezis told Camilla.

HM King Charles III and Queen Camilla arrive in Sydney and the Sails of the Sydney Opera House ( 
Image:
Ian Vogler / Daily Mirror)
Charles, 75, and Camilla, 77, spoke to primary school-aged children from the Thomas’ Sunday school group who were brimming with enthusiasm to meet Their Majesties’. They had patiently waited for over an hour and when officials started arriving one boy excitedly shouted: “Are they here?!”

Arriving before Their Majesties’, Governor-General Sam Mostyn stopped to speak to the youngsters and said: “What an exciting day for you, I hope you love meeting him, it’s a rare treat.” The youngsters nervously waved their Australian flags as the King and Queen arrived but the royal couple quickly put them at ease as they chatted to them.

Camilla, wearing a pale green Anna Valentine dress and straw hat, was gifted a posy before they were received by the Archbishop of Sydney, the Most Reverend Kanishka Raffel and the Bishop of North Sydney, Right Reverend Chris Edwards.

Inside, the Archbishop welcomed the congregation and highlighted St Thomas’ royal history before the Reverend Michael Mantle, Rector of the Parish of North Sydney. Starting by welcoming the royal guests, he said: “It is an enormous honour for us to welcome you to our church this morning.”The theme of the service was ‘The Good News About Jesus’ and featured hymns Rejoice the Lord is King, Tell Out, My Soul and Love Divine, All Loves Excelling. Throughout the service, a lone flute could be heard from outside playing “God Save the King”.

Speaking afterwards professional flutist Minah Kim said she only learnt the piece this morning while standing on the lawn outside St Thomas’. “We got it up on our phones and she learned it and started practising,” said Anna Usher who stood next to her.

Duchess Catherine has always been a recognised style icon, and her recent appearance at the 100 Women in Finance Gala cemented her reputation as a stylish royal.

The event was held at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London and was aimed at raising funds for mental health initiatives that Catherine has passionately supported for many years.

The annual gathering brings together influential women in finance for a night of celebration and support, but it was Catherine’s glamorous presence that really stood out. She wore a stunning pale pink dress, a departure from her usual structured looks.

The dress featured a flowing silhouette and airy fabric, which complimented her natural grace. Catherine paired the dress with minimal yet elegant accessories, which helped to make the dress stand out. She chose a small sparkling clutch and delicate earrings to complete the romantic look. Her hair is worn loose in loose curls, framing her face naturally and complementing her modern elegance. Catherine is known for choosing delicate, flowing gowns for special events.

For example, at the 2017 BAFTA Awards, she wore an off-the-shoulder black floral Alexander McQueen gown that exuded romantic elegance while also capturing global attention. Another notable moment was in 2018 when she wore a whimsical pink Jenny Packham gown at the Tusk Conservation Awards, echoing the effortless style she showed off at the recent gala. Her preference for soft color palettes and flowing fabrics has become her trademark, allowing her to maintain a refined royal image while embracing contemporary trends.

Beyond fashion, the 2019 gala highlighted Catherine’s strong commitment to mental health awareness. As a patron of several mental health charities, including Heads Together, she works to de-stigmatise mental health. Her presence has highlighted the need to support mental health services, particularly for young people. Catherine’s genuine passion for this cause was evident as she spoke to guests about their work in finance and mental health advocacy.

Her ability to combine royal duties with her personal interests has made her a beloved figure in the royal family. Her continued support for mental health initiatives, particularly for children and young people, has earned her widespread admiration. Looking back, it’s clear that Catherine has mastered the art of dressing with a purpose. Her style goes beyond fashion statements, it reinforces her role as a royal committed to important causes.

The gown she wore to the gala showcased her public persona as elegant, approachable and dedicated to making a positive impact. As she balances her responsibilities as a mother, royal and mental health advocate, her presence at the gala served as a reminder of her ability to captivate audiences through both her fashion choices and her unwavering dedication to charity.

The British royal family has long been seen as a symbol of tradition and grace. However, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have recently captured headlines with their candid criticisms of the Royal Institution. Now, Elton John, a close friend of the royal family, has made a surprising revelation regarding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s recent comments. Could this be a turning point in the ongoing saga between the couple and the British monarchy? Let’s delve deeper to uncover the details of Elton John’s bold revelation and the growing tension between Meghan, Harry, and the royal family.Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s exit from royal life—often referred to as “Megxit”—marked a significant shift in their relationship with the royal family. But how did we go from a picture-perfect royal wedding to where we are today, with Meghan and Harry openly criticizing the very institution they once embraced?

 

The fairy tale wedding that captivated the world took place in 2018, symbolizing a modernizing face of the monarchy. Meghan was seen as a breath of fresh air, bringing diversity to a historically traditional institution. However, the honeymoon phase was short-lived, as rumors of tension between Meghan and various members of the royal family began to surface. Claims of a rift between Harry and his brother, Prince William, along with Meghan’s reported struggles with the media, soon followed.

By early 2020, the couple made the shocking decision to step back from their senior royal duties, citing intense media scrutiny and a desire for financial independence as their main reasons. In their now-infamous interview with Oprah Winfrey, Meghan and Harry shared deeply personal grievances, accusing certain royal family members of racism and perpetuating lies about them. But did their claims come from a place of truth, or was there more to the story? What role did external influences play, and how did the royal family react behind closed doors?

For years, Elton John has maintained close ties with the royal family, including Princess Diana and her sons. His relationship with the monarchy has always been one of respect and loyalty. So when he recently spoke out about Meghan and Harry’s ongoing public criticism of the royal family, the world took notice.

In a surprising turn of events, Elton John reportedly condemned Meghan and Harry’s continuous public bashing of the royal family. While he has defended the couple in the past, this latest development suggests that even he is growing weary of their tactics. According to sources close to the musician, Elton believes that Meghan and Harry’s strategy of attacking the royal family may no longer be driven by personal grievances but by a need to remain relevant in the public eye.

Elton John’s commentary raises a critical question: have Meghan and Harry become so dependent on their public personas that they are willing to tarnish their relationship with the royal family to stay in the spotlight? This theory isn’t entirely far-fetched; after all, the couple has signed multi-million dollar deals with media giants like Netflix and Spotify. While their platform is successful, it often revolves around similar narratives: conflict with the royal family, mental health struggles, and life after the palace.

But is this really the path they want to continue down, or is there a way forward that allows them to step out of the royal shadow without burning every bridge behind them?

Public opinion on Meghan and Harry is split. Some see them as victims of an outdated institution, while others think their media appearances boost their brand more than help. Many supporters champion Meghan and Harry for speaking out against the royal institution, believing the couple highlights important issues like mental health and racism.

“I’ve been a fan of Meghan since her *Suits* days,” says Jessica, a 35-year-old marketer from California. “I admire her courage. It takes guts to walk away from something as powerful as the royal family and live your own life.”

On the flip side, skeptics argue that Meghan and Harry are more interested in staying relevant than making a difference. Their constant media appearances lead many to question their motives. Are they genuinely fighting for justice, or is this just another way to keep their names in the headlines?

Elton John appears to lean towards the skeptics, expressing concern that Meghan and Harry’s actions might be harmful. What will Meghan and Harry do next? Will they take Elton’s criticism to heart, or will they continue down the same path, potentially alienating more of their supporters?

Elton John’s comments clarify that the relationship between Meghan, Harry, and the royal family is strained. The ongoing drama has left deep scars, and Elton’s involvement complicates the narrative. Reconciliation may be possible, but it seems less likely with each public statement. The constant drama is exhausting for many.

The royal family risks losing their reputation in this feud; their dignity is at stake. Yet, remaining silent keeps them respected. Can the royal family continue to stay silent while Harry and Meghan dominate the headlines with their side of the story, or will they eventually be forced to speak out?

Elton John’s comments add another layer to this unfolding drama, suggesting even those close to the royal family are tired of Meghan and Harry’s approach. The pressing question remains: what’s next for the couple? Will Meghan and Harry adjust their strategy, or will they continue seeking attention with controversial statements? Only time will tell.

What do you think? Are Meghan and Harry justified in their criticism of the royal family, or have they taken things too far? Should the royal family remain silent, or is it time for them to speak out? Share your thoughts and join the conversation!

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry find themselves at a crossroads. Elton John’s bombshell illustrates the delicate balance between their independence and public image. Their next steps could either make them trailblazers or further alienate them from supporters.

Since stepping down from royal duties, Meghan and Harry have become global celebrities. They’ve secured significant deals and launched charities, yet the royal family still garners most of the media attention. It’s a paradox: they want to be free from the monarchy, but can’t seem to escape its shadow. Is it possible for them to fully detach from the royal narrative, or are they destined to remain linked to it forever?

Hollywood is filled with examples of celebrities facing similar challenges. Some, like Angelina Jolie, have transitioned from tabloid fame to respected humanitarians, while others remain trapped by past scandals. Meghan and Harry’s situation is reminiscent of this struggle. Focusing on past royal grievances might make them seem one-dimensional.

“It’s like that friend who always brings up their ex at every gathering,” says Rachel, a 29-year-old teacher. “At some point, you just want them to move on and talk about something else.”

Meghan and Harry need to redirect their focus from royal drama to their passions. They’ve made strides, but they must keep moving forward without looking back. Letting go of the past might be the key to finding a new path.

The royal family has remained quiet while Meghan and Harry speak out. This silence has served them well in the past, but as the Sussexes shift public perception, the family’s silence is increasingly questioned. The risks of staying silent are evident; while it has worked before, today’s social media landscape shapes opinions rapidly. Meghan and Harry’s openness might make the royal family appear out of touch.

While there is power in silence, it can also be interpreted as avoidance. The royal family’s quietude has historically been a strength, but in today’s world, it might not be enough. Will there come a time when the royal family feels compelled to break their silence, and if so, how will that alter the dynamic between them and Meghan and Harry?

The rift between Meghan, Harry, and the royal family is significant and affects the future of the British monarchy. For centuries, the monarchy has stood as a symbol of stability, yet younger generations seek leaders who are open and accountable. The royal family’s traditional ways may now seem outdated.The British public’s perception of the monarchy is complex. While many support the royals, others question their relevance today. Meghan and Harry’s discussions on race and mental health have resonated with many, but their frequent public appearances and deals have raised further questions. The royal family faces a tough balancing act between maintaining tradition and embracing progress.

 

Elton John’s bombshell indicates that Meghan and Harry’s future is uncertain. Their journey has been filled with ups and downs as they seek identity, purpose, and peace.

Time might heal the rift between Meghan, Harry, and the royal family, but for reconciliation to happen, both sides must be willing to let go of past grievances. Finding a new way to relate is key. Is reconciliation even possible at this point, or have public accusations and private tensions created a divide too deep to bridge?

Meghan and Harry’s best choice may be to move forward graciously, potentially redefining their legacy. They could be seen as individuals who made a difference, not just as ex-royals.

For anyone facing similar challenges, whether in personal relationships or professional contexts, the lesson is clear: moving forward often requires leaving the past behind.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry stepped down as senior royals in January 2020 and settled in the United States. However, they have continued to support numerous charitable and political causes like Black Lives Matter, Invictus Games, and climate change.

According to British TV and radio presenter, Beverly Turner, the Duchess has political ambitions and may even ‘run for office’ in the future. “She will run for President, I have no doubt about it,” Turner once stated during an interview on Channel 5. “I have no doubt, I think this is all part of the plan. It may not be very soon but it will be.” As per UK Mirror, presenter, Jeremy Vine, however, remained skeptical. Turner added in an attempt to persuade, “I have it on fairly good authority that she would like to run for President…There may be worse presidents…I would like to see a mixed-race woman in the White House.” In response, Vine remarked, “I don’t know whether woke wins elections, that is the problem here.” Turner interjected, “What do you mean by woke? Opinionated?” “Woke is not aligning with where consensus is now, I suppose that is the thing,” Vine answered.

 

 

Meghan attends the Invictus Games on April 16, 2022, in The Hague, Netherlands. (Image Source: Samir Hussein/GettyImages)
A well-known Democrat has already expressed support for Markle’s ambition to be the first female president. According to the New York Post, Valerie Biden Owens, President Joe Biden’s sister, has ‘endorsed’ the ex-royal as a woman she would support for the White House. Owens believed that Markle would ‘make a good presidential candidate one day.’ Reports suggest that the Duchess of Sussex has been establishing relationships with prominent Democrats since leaving the royal life in 2020.

 

 

 

Owens opined, “The more women we have, the better our democratic system will work, with a better point of view, a different point of view and we embrace all women,” she continued. “We welcome Markle to come in and join the Democratic Party.” Former president Donald Trump also believes that Markle will make a strong contender for the White House. As reported by the Daily Mail, Trump was asked about his thoughts on the Duchess of Sussex meeting with Democratic operatives and a potential run during an appearance on Fox News in 2021. He replied, “Well I hope that happens because if that happened I think I’d have an even stronger feeling toward running.” He went on to add that he wasn’t a fan of Markle. “I’m not a fan of hers. I think that what she talks about the Royal family and the Queen, and I happen to think, I know the Queen as you know, I met with the Queen and I think the Queen is a tremendous person and I am not a fan of Meghan.”

 

Australia is getting ready for a significant Royal visit as K ing Charles and Queen Camilla are expected to touch down later this week. The Royal couple will be making their first trip to the country since 2018, with stops in Sydney and Canberra.

This came in the same year that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle undertook a high-profile tour of Australia just months after they were married. The Sussexes spent 16 days touring Australia, Fiji, Tonga, and New Zealand on their inaugural joint Royal tour.On the eve of the tour, it was announced that Meghan and Harry were expecting their son, Prince Archie. The couple drew massive crowds during their tour, attending an impressive 76 engagements.

 

However, Valentine Low, former Royal correspondent for The Times, claims in his book, Courtiers: The Hidden Power Behind the Crown, that although Meghan “enjoyed the attention” she received, she didn’t understand the purpose of Royal walkabout.

He writes: “On the South Pacific tour, Harry and Meghan were going down a storm. Massive crowds were turning out to see them, and Meghan’s refreshingly informal approach to royal visits was proving a hit with the Australian public.”

“Behind the scenes, however, it was a different story. Although she enjoyed the attention, Meghan failed to understand the point of all those walkabouts, shaking hands with countless strangers. According to several members of staff, she was heard to say on at least one occasion: ‘I can’t believe I’m not getting paid for this’.”The book also includes an insider’s account claiming that upon seeing fans waiting outside the Sydney Opera House, Meghan remarked to her team: “What are they all doing here? It’s silly.” As Charles and Camilla prepare to arrive in Australia later this week, the Sydney Opera House is set to play a significant role in their tour. It will be lit up in a grand welcome for the King and Queen.