According to reports, Prince Harry is keen to bring Meghan Markle and their two children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet back to the UK for visits – but one major stumbling block stands in his way

Prince Harry with wife Meghan Markle (
Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Prince Harry is reportedly keen to bring his wife Meghan Markle and their two children to the UK for visits – but one ‘frightening’ hurdle is stopping him.

Reports at the weekend suggested Harry had contacted a group of former trusted advisors as well as old pals to create a “blueprint” outlining how he might one day begin moving in UK circles again.

But The Mirror understands this is “far from his mind” and any contact with former aides would be “purely for strategic and friendly advice”, rather than any plot to return to the fold. However, it is believed Harry would like to make more trips to his homeland as he is eager to visit old friends and family and work directly with the UK-based organisations he supports.

The couple with their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet ( 
Image:
Instagram/Alexi Lubomirski)

Harry and Meghan on a recent trip to Colombia ( 
Image:
Getty Images)
According to PEOPLE magazine, Harry is also keen to bring his family Meghan, Prince Archie, five, and three-year-old Princess Lilibet for visits too – but the one significant stumbling block is his security situation. His automatic right to police protection in the UK was lost when he and Meghan sensationally quit their royal roles over four years ago.

Harry has been embroiled in a legal battle against the Home Office to have this reinstated for himself and his family and is preparing an appeal after losing a previous court battle, with insiders saying he is focused on getting the security back.

The magazine also reports the issue has caused a deepening of his estrangement from his father King Charles, with a source telling the publication: “Harry is frightened and feels the only person who can do anything about it is his father.” But it points out a palace source has explained Harry’s security situation is not in the hands of the King.

Last week, Harry did manage to make an under-the-radar visit to the UK where he and estranged brother Prince William both attended a memorial for their uncle Lord Fellowes, the late husband of their aunt and Princess Diana’s older sister Jane, in Norfolk last week. Harry made a secret trip from the US to the UK for the event, reportedly staying with his uncle Earl Spencer, Diana’s younger brother, at the Spencer’s ancestral home of Althorp.

Harry with estranged brother Prince WilliamDon’t Miss
William and Harry have not spoken for months and currently have no contact, choosing to stay apart from each other even when in the same room last month for the service. Sources have revealed that Harry would not return to the royal fold unless he received an apology from William.

The Duke of Sussex is focused on “making a success of his life” in the United States and maintains he is happy with his decision on choosing to quit as a working royal, sources close to the Harry suggest. However, it remains that he would be open to taking up a temporary role within the family to “help out” if he was asked to do so by the King.

Harry’s friends say he is aware of his brother’s feelings on the matter after The Mirror previously revealed William suggested there was “zero chance” he would be welcomed back into the fold after penning his explosive memoir, Spare.

Sources close to Harry say given the Royal Family’s position this year, with the King and Princess of Wales both forced to take extended periods of leave from duties due to cancer treatment, the Duke remains open and willing to assist if he was called upon.

Harry’s friends say he is also determined to improve his relationship with his father, especially given his recent health woes. However, the Duke – who turns 40 next week – would still look for an apology from his warring brother if he were to represent the family in any capacity.

Prince Harry ‘will not return to royal duties without apology from Prince William’

Prince Harry is open to taking up a “temporary role” supporting the Royal Family if King Charles were to ask – but would expect an apology from his brother Prince William first

Prince Harry would not return to the royal fold unless he received an apology from his estranged brother Prince William, sources have revealed.

The Duke of Sussex is focused on “making a success of his life” in the United States and maintains he is happy with his decision on choosing to quit his royal life, sources close to the Duke suggest.

However, it remains that he would be open to taking up a temporary role within the family to “help out” if he was asked to do so by the King.

If you can’t see the poll, click here

Friends of Harry say he is aware of his brother’s feelings on the matter after The Mirror previously revealed Prince William suggested there was “zero chance” he would be welcomed back into the fold after penning his explosive memoir, Spare.

Harry and William have not spoken for months and have no contact ( 
Image:
Getty Images)
Harry, 39, took aim at close members of his family and accused the King and Prince William of being desperate to leave the royal family if they could.

William and Harry have not spoken for months and currently have no contact, choosing to stay apart from each other even when in the same room last month for their uncle Lord Fellows’ funeral in Norfolk.

Reports at the weekend suggested Harry had contacted a group of former trusted advisors as well as old pals to create a “blueprint” outlining how he might one day begin moving in UK circles again.

But The Mirror understands this is “far from his mind” and any contact with former aides would be “purely for strategic and friendly advice”, rather than any plot to return to the fold.

Harry’s book Spare reportedly widened the rift between the pair ( 
Image:
Getty Images)

Sources close to Harry say given the royal family’s position this year, with the King and Princess of Wales both forced to take extended periods of leave from duties due to cancer treatment, the Duke remains open and willing to assist, if he was called upon.

Friends of Harry say he is also determined to improve his relationship with his father, especially given his recent health woes.

However, the Duke – who turns 40 next week – would still look for an apology from his warring brother if he was to represent the family in any capacity.

Prince Harry torn to shreds by top Hollywood comedian Joe Rogan in career blow

Podcaster and comedian Joe Rogan live-streamed his first stand-up gig in six years on Netflix, where he discussed finding out he’d been ‘cancelled’ by Prince Harry.

Joe Rogan speaks about his Spotify row in 2022

Joe Rogan has ruthlessly mocked Prince Harry during his latest Netflix comedy special. The popular podcaster accused the Duke of Sussex of “talking s**t” about him in the past before mimicking his accent live on stage.

Joe Rogan: Burn the Boats was initially streamed live on August 4 from the Majestic Theatre in San Antonio, Texas. The 57-year-old’s show marked the first time in six years that he’d delivered a stand-up routine in front of a live audience.

During the one-hour 17-minute programme, the comedian made numerous jokes regarding the Covid vaccination, the transgender community and Prince Harry, 39. “I got cancelled so often during Covid that sometimes I would find out by accident,” Joe began.

“This is a true story. One time I just woke up, I’m in my underwear I plop down, turn the TV on. Prince Harry’s talking s**t about me. I’m like ‘I just woke up’.

“I’m vulnerable. I’m in my underwear and there is a prince on TV talking about me.” He then continued to impersonate the Prince, saying: “He’s like ‘Joe Rogan is giving out dangerous vaccine misinformation.’ And my first thought was ‘f**k did I? I might have’.”

 

Joe Rogan didn’t hold back in his first live stand-up in six years. (Image: GETTY)

Joe Rogan mocked Prince Harry during his live Netflix event (Image: NETFLIX)

Joe’s anecdote referred to Prince Harry and his wife 43-year-old Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, revealing they’d “expressed concerns” to Spotify regarding the “Covid misinformation” he was allegedly spouting on his show, The Joe Rogan Experience.

The New Jersey native continued to lay into Prince Harry during Burn the Boats and queried later what it would be like to do drugs with him.

“Could you imagine doing mushrooms with Prince Harry? You imagine if you could trick that guy into doing mushrooms with you,” the UFC commentator joked.

“The moment you see him chew it and swallow it. There’s a moment when you do mushrooms, like 20 minutes after you swallow it, when you know you can’t throw it up anymore.

“And you’re like ‘Oh no it’s going to happen’ and you’re sitting eye to eye with the prince. And here’s the thing.

“Mushrooms take about 40 minutes to kick in, but about 35 minutes in you hear them coming. You hear footsteps in the distance. Meanwhile, Prince Harry is tripping balls.”

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle previously called out Joe Rogan for COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ (Image: GETTY)

He added that if the situation ever occurred he would “hover over” Prince Harry and say: “Are you sure vaccines are safe?” B**ch you’re not a scientist.”

Joe went on to confess that he “might have” played a part in spreading misinformation about the Covid vaccine, but that he had no regrets.

He claimed that if his listeners are getting “vaccine advice” from him, is it “really [his] fault”.

“That’s not my job, kids. I’m a professional s**t talker. Some of the things I say make sense. A lot of them don’t. It’s up to you to figure out what’s what. That’s the fun part.”

Elsewhere, Joe ridiculed gay men and claimed he thinks of them the “same way [he] thinks about mountain lions”.

 

“I’m happy they’re real, but I don’t want to be surrounded by them,” he laughed.

They’re a bunch of dudes who f**k dudes. I don’t like my chances, OK? They’re not unicorns — they’re just men who f**k men.”

However, the father-of-three—who has been married to Jessica Ditzel since 2009—confirmed that he wasn’t “even remotely homophobic”.

“I’m the opposite. I wish I was gay.”

Burn the Boats follows in the footsteps of 2016’s Netflix specials Joe Rogan: Triggered and 2018’s Joe Rogan: Strange Times. It is now available to stream on the platform.

 

Prince Harry Furious at South Park’s Mocking: ‘LOSES IT’ Over ‘Awards Chasers

In a recent episode titled “The Prince Who Cried Wolf,” the irreverent animated series South Park has targeted Prince Harry, according to reports circulating from the YouTube channel Royal Saga, known for its biting satire. Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone allegedly delivered a scathing critique of Harry’s acceptance of the Pat Tillman Award, dubbing it the “worst Award of the year.” 

The episode purportedly satirizes the process of awards selection, depicting a group of out-of-touch executives scrambling to boost viewership by selecting a symbolic figurehead. Enter Prince Harry, portrayed as a royal seeking relevance following his highly publicized rift with the British monarchy.

If true, this portrayal is expected to provoke controversy, particularly among Harry’s staunch supporters. Originally established to honor the heroic sacrifice of Corporal Pat Tillman, a fallen soldier and former NFL star, the Pat Tillman Award holds deep sentimental value for veterans and military families. Tillman famously abandoned his football career to serve in the military, embodying a commitment to duty over personal gain.

In contrast, Prince Harry’s nomination raises eyebrows due to his complex history within the royal family and his subsequent ventures into lucrative media deals. South Park’s satirical lens reportedly underscores this contrast, portraying Harry as a celebrity leveraging his military background for personal gain. This perspective resonates with critics skeptical of Harry’s sincerity in accepting the award.

Moreover, the episode critiques the broader culture of awards, often criticized for their self-congratulatory nature and the elevation of celebrity status over genuine merit. The narrative extends beyond Harry’s individual circumstances, touching on broader themes of celebrity culture and public perception. Reports suggest South Park uses humor to dissect the dynamics between fame and credibility, highlighting how celebrity status can overshadow genuine contributions.

Meanwhile, recent discussions around Prince Harry’s public image indicate a complex backdrop. Reports suggest a perceived rivalry between Harry and his older brother, Prince William, who has garnered significant popularity in the United States. This popularity is evidenced by viral moments such as a selfie with Taylor Swift and endorsements from prominent American public figures. Observers speculate that William’s appeal stems not only from his royal status but also from the perception of him as a proactive and relatable figure.

In contrast, some critics argue that Harry’s outspokenness and public critiques of the royal family may have diminished his standing, particularly in international contexts where traditional royal decorum is highly valued. Social media reactions reflect a divided opinion on the matter. Supporters of the royals voice frustration over perceived biased media coverage favoring one brother over the other. They criticize what they see as attempts to undermine Harry’s achievements or public statements.

Conversely, critics argue that Harry’s departure from royal duties and his subsequent media ventures have shifted public perception, sometimes overshadowing his charitable work and advocacy efforts. They point to ongoing controversies and public disputes as evidence of a fractured relationship between Harry and the royal establishment.

South Park’s humorous take on Prince Harry’s acceptance of the Pat Tillman Award underscores deeper societal critiques around fame, credibility, and public perception. As the animated series continues to push boundaries, its portrayal of Harry reflects broader debates about celebrity culture and the significance of public recognition.

Prince William ‘reduced King Charles to tears’ with surprise plans to carry on vital family history

King Charles has revealed how his son Prince William ‘reduced him to tears’ with his touching plans to carry on his beloved life’s work….

King Charles has revealed how his son Prince William ‘reduced him to tears’ with his touching plans to carry on his beloved life’s work.

Growing up in the Royal Family, knowing that one day your position in the royal line of succession will mean you’ll have to join The Firm and have your entire life’s path already set out in stone for you must be daunting, to say the least. But Prince William has taken it all in stride, though he is making sure that his son Prince George has a little more say in his own future.

When he became the Prince of Wales following King Charles’ coronation, William also inherited his father’s previous titles of the heir apparent and the Duke of Cornwall, subsequently making him responsible for managing the vast Duchy of Cornwall estate.

The Cornwall estate is one that King Charles was immensely fond of and, over the five decades in which he was in charge, he spent a lot of time ensuring its success. The estate is vast, covering more than 20 different counties across England and Wales, with the land owned by the Duke boasting many housing developments, holiday cottages, farms, woodland, and even coastlines.

King Charles spent a lot of time keeping the area beautiful and its wildelfe protected and giving that up when he became King must’ve been heartbreaking. But, little did he know, when William took it over, he was sure to be just as passionate about the land and the people living on it as his father had always been.

Speaking in the ITV documentary Prince Charles: Inside the Duchy of Cornwall, William can be seen speaking with a farmer on the land, telling him of the future, “I’ve started to think about how I will inherit the Duchy one day and what I do with it. I think it’s really important, the family angle, I really do.”

King Charles, upon hearing his son’s thoughtful plans, told the documentary team, “When I saw it, I couldn’t believe it. I was deeply touched and moved by what he said. Frankly, it reduced me to tears. It did, really. Because, I suddenly thought, well, just hearing that from him has made the last 50 years worthwhile.”And William seems to be following through with his family angle. He currently has plans to construct homes on some of the empty Duchy land to help combat homelessness in the South West of England. Construction is set to start in September 2024.

Homelessness is a cause William is incredibly passionate about, with the desire to help find a solution stemming from his mother Princess Diana’s interest in the cause before him.

Speaking about how his mother introduced him to the stark facts of the homelessness epidemic, William told the Listen Up podcast, “It started off with a visit to The Passage [a homelessness charity] with my mother a long time ago, and I think it opened my eyes to some of the challenges that face people in all walks of life,” he said.

“I think that’s quite crucial to reiterate, because I think a lot of people live in bubbles sometimes and they don’t really – they might care, but they won’t really go and look and understand what’s going on. That’s not necessarily because they don’t want to, it’s just because they’re not exposed to it.”

He added that, one day, he hopes to take Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis to the same charity and get them involved with the cause he is so passionate about.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Slammed as ‘Dumb Political Pawns’ by Colombian Public

Colombians are not thrilled about Meghan and Harry’s visit. Many believe that the Colombian government is using them as political pawns to distract from ongoing scandals. The couple is set to embark on a four-day tour of Colombia starting this Thursday. Their itinerary includes stops in Bogotá, the historical city of Cartagena, and the cultural festival in Cali.
They’re visiting at the invitation of Colombian Vice President Francia Márquez, the country’s first Black vice president. While the couple is expected to engage with local elders, youth, and women, many Colombians see this visit as more about self-promotion than genuine cultural exchange.

A prominent Bogotá lawyer expressed skepticism, stating, “Everyone here thinks Meghan and Harry are being manipulated. Their star power will likely be used to draw attention to certain areas in Colombia, but it’s clear they’re promoting themselves, not Colombia.”

This skepticism isn’t unfounded. The Colombian government has been grappling with scandals since coming into power two years ago. The recent controversies include corruption charges against the president’s son and allegations of infidelity against President Gustavo Petro. As a result, the government may be hoping to divert attention from these issues by spotlighting the Sussexes.

A spokesperson for the vice president’s office confirmed the trip but remained tight-lipped about the details. They mentioned that only three of the events will be open to the public, with all others under careful control to manage the narrative. This suggests a highly curated media presence for the visit.

Colombians are also unhappy about the security costs for the Sussexes, which are reportedly being covered by taxpayers. Critics argue that Meghan and Harry, being multimillionaires, should bear their own security expenses. There’s frustration that taxpayer money is being used for what many perceive as a PR stunt for both the Sussexes and the Colombian government.

The situation mirrors the controversy in the UK, where Prince Harry is also fighting for taxpayer-funded security during his visits. It seems both Colombian and British taxpayers are similarly frustrated with the perceived misuse of public funds.

In summary, Colombians are not pleased with Meghan and Harry’s visit, viewing it as a ploy by the government to distract from its problems. There’s also dissatisfaction about the financial burden of securing the Sussexes, with many feeling that it’s an unjust expense.

Prince Harry’s had a lengthy on-off relationship with former girlfriend Chelsy Davy – but according to a book, she finally called it quits with him in 2011 after she was attended a huge royal event

Prince Harry (

Marrying a prince, becoming princess and living in a palace might seem like the ultimate fairytale dream – but the reality is very different.

And even though Prince Harry has found his happy ever after with Meghan Markle, one of his ex-girlfriends ended their romance after realising she wasn’t cut out for royal life. And it is claimed that realisation came after she watched the Prince and Princess of Wales tie the knot in 2011.

At that time, Harry was in an on-off relationship with his first serious girlfriend Chelsy Davy – a Zimbabwean lawyer who Harry had known since school. However, she seemingly struggled to deal with the royal spotlight, and it was Kate and William’s wedding that proved to her for the final time that it wasn’t the life she wanted.

Harry and Chelsy at the rugby together in 2008 ( 
Image:
AFP/Getty Images)
Royal biographer Robert Lacey explains in his book Battle of Brothers that shortly after the wedding, Chelsy finally ended their long romance. He writes: “In 2011, after more comings and goings, she finally decided to go – and it was, ironically, Kate and William’s grand and glorious wedding that spring that did it for her. According to a friend, she told Harry that she could never make the scarifies she had witnessed Kate making, particularly when it came to moulding her life around the unremitting attention of the press.”

However, it wasn’t just Chelsy who decided against royal life – his next girlfriend Cressida Bonas did too. The Burberry model met Harry in 2012 and the pair dated on and off until 2014. And Robert explains in his book how she became “spooked” by William and Kate’s royal tour of Australia.

Harry with former girlfriend Cressida Bonas in 2014 ( 
Image:
WireImage)
He says: “A rising actress, Cressida did not enjoy the critical remarks that she could hear people making behind her back when she walked down the street in London – she felt that the fame of her relationship put her ‘in a box’.

“In 2014, she was said to have been ‘completely spooked’ after watching the TV coverage of William and Kate touring New Zealand with baby George in tow – that was not the way she would want to enjoy her eight-month-old son, she regretfully explained to Harry.”

After she split from Harry, Chelsy went on to marry Sam Cutmore-Scott and welcomed their first child together in 2022. It’s reported they named their son, Leo. And just earlier this week, it was revealed they have welcomed a second child together – a daughter called Chloe.

Chelsy made the announcement on her Instagram account and also posted for the first time on her jewellery brand’s page, Aya Jewels. She uploaded a number of images of the youngster and wrote: “POV: it’s been three years and two babies since your last new collection, but you’re mega-excited to be back in the game.”

She revealed the name of the child – as well as a new collection – as she continued: “Introducing the Chloe Collection, named after my baby girl. Hope you love it as much as I do x.”

RICHARD EDEN: The ‘Meghan problem’ and the overlooked reasons courtiers and friends tell me why William and Kate won’t welcome back Harry

The much-heralded reunion of Oasis rock stars Noel and Liam Gallagher has led to numerous calls for an even more prominent pair of estranged brothers to ‘get the band back together’.

While the Mancunian musicians are due to play for the money, Princes William and Harry would be performing together on the world stage for the good of the Monarchy, or so the argument goes.

Those calling for King Charles’s sons to use the Gallaghers as a model for fraternal reconciliation, have, however, conveniently overlooked two key factors that have been stressed to me during conversations over the past week with courtiers and royal pals.

Firstly, the Gallagher rapprochement was agreed only, it is said, because of Noel’s separation from his second wife, Sara MacDonald. The PR executive was widely thought to have stood in the way of any Oasis reunion. She and irascible Liam had clashed repeatedly over the years, with Liam even comparing her and his brother, at one point, to being ‘like Fred and Rose West’.

Harry, by contrast, remains happily married to Meghan. Although the American former actress has not compared William and the Princess of Wales to serial killers, she has publicly claimed Catherine made her cry and accused unnamed royals of being racists. The accused were later identified by Meghan’s cheerleader Omid Scobie as Catherine and the King.

The second overlooked factor is that Noel publicly traded insults with his brother for years, calling him, for example, ‘the angriest man you’ll ever meet’. Noel added of the singer: ‘He’s like a man with a fork in a world of soup.’

By contrast, William, like his wife, has refused to be drawn into a slanging match with his brother that would be unbecoming of a future King. We have only caught glimpses of his anger at the insults to which he has been subjected from across the Atlantic.

Who can forget the Prince of Wales declaring forcefully, ‘We are very much not a racist family’, when a reporter shouted a question to him on his first public engagement after Harry and Meghan’s explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021?

Harry’s attendance at the memorial service in Norfolk for his uncle Lord (Robert) Fellowes last week, who died in July aged 82, was the first time that he has been at the same event as his brother since 2022. Then, they took part in an awkward walkabout at Windsor with their wives after the death of their grandmother Queen Elizabeth.

Although fellow mourners said the brothers did not speak to each other at St Mary’s Church in Snettisham, their attendance has provoked much speculation about a reconciliation between the pair.

However, not one of the friends or courtiers I spoke to this week thought that would happen, at least not in the near future.

Copy link to paste in your message

As his wife has treatment for cancer, a friend of William says there is one member of the family the prince is keen to see returning to public engagements – and it’s not Harry

‘There will be no reunion until Harry and Meghan apologise to their Royal Highnesses for everything they have said,’ one former courtier told me. ‘And there is no sign that is likely.’

A friend of the royals told me: ‘It’s hard to see a reconciliation. How could there be when William and Catherine have the justifiable fear that anything they say could appear in a future book or be repeated in a TV programme.’

In a reference to Catherine, who has been undergoing treatment for an unnamed form of cancer, a pal of William told me: ‘There is one member of the family who William is keen to see returning to public engagements – and it’s not Harry.’

Sign up for Richard Eden’s Royal Newsletter. Click here.

Amidst turmoil within the royal family, fans rally in support of Meghan Markle, proclaiming, “Meghan possesses all the qualities of a future queen.”

In a surprising revelation, Meghan Markle, alongside Prince Harry, made headlines in 2020 when they decided to step down from their roles within the working royal family. However, recent reports have shed light on a lesser-known incident involving Meghan’s past acting career.

According to the show’s creator, Aaron Korsh, Meghan Markle faced restrictions on using a particular British term during the final season of the hit TV series “Suits.” In an interview that has recently resurfaced, Korsh disclosed that the Duchess of Sussex was prohibited by the Palace from saying the word “poppyc***” on camera.

This directive reportedly dates back to before Meghan’s marriage to Prince Harry in 2018 when she was still portraying the character Rachel Zane in the legal drama series.

Korsh explained that the original script included a line where Meghan’s character, Rachel Zane, was supposed to mention the term “poppyc***” as a subtle reference to his own family’s communication habits. He elaborated, “My wife’s family, when they have a topic to discuss that might be sensitive, they use the word ‘poppyc***’.”

However, the Royal Family intervened and objected to Meghan saying the word, expressing concerns that it could be manipulated to sound like a more offensive term. Korsh recalled, “They didn’t want to put the word ‘poppyc***’ in her mouth. I presume because they didn’t want people cutting things together of her saying ‘ck.’ So, we had to change it to ‘bulls*.’”

The resurfacing of this revelation, particularly on social media platform TikTok, has sparked mixed reactions among royal fans. While some applaud the Palace’s caution, noting the potential for misinterpretation or manipulation of the footage, others argue that in the modern era, such restrictions may seem outdated.

“It’s only right they consider this stuff,” commented one supporter of the Palace’s decision, emphasizing the importance of upholding the royal family’s image as representatives of the British state.

Conversely, another commenter pointed out, “it’s the 21st century and it’s just a word,” suggesting a more relaxed stance on such language restrictions.

The incident serves as a reminder of the intricacies and protocols surrounding the royal family’s public image, even in seemingly minor aspects of their lives and careers.

Harry FURIOUSLY STORMS Out of Invictus Headquarters as Germany DROPS Him for Dr. Stephan Keller

Word on the street is that Harry had a massive meltdown at Invictus headquarters last week after finding out some shocking news about Germany’s involvement in this year’s games. Apparently the German government informed Harry that they were cutting all ties and sponsorships with Invictus and would no longer be participating under his leadership.

Instead, they revealed they would be working directly with Dr. Stephan Keller – a highly decorated German colonel and former Invictus competitor – to launch their very own Paralympic-style event in 2023 completely independent of Harry and Invictus. Major OOF!

My sources say Harry totally lost it when he found out. He started angrily pacing around the boardroom, yelling things like “After everything I’ve done for Germany, this is how you repay me??” and “How dare you undermine my authority and leadership!”.

The latest rumor circulating about Prince Harry is a dramatic meltdown at the Invictus Games headquarters following a shocking revelation from Germany. According to sources, Harry was informed that the German government had decided to cut all ties with Invictus under his leadership and instead would work with Dr. Stephen Keller, a highly respected German veteran and former Invictus competitor, to launch their own paralympic-style event in 2023. This news reportedly sent Harry into a furious outburst, pacing around the boardroom, shouting about how he felt betrayed by Germany.

Eyewitnesses describe a chaotic scene, with Harry allegedly throwing a potted plant in anger and storming out while cursing both Germany and the Invictus Games. The root of his frustration appears to stem from Germany choosing Dr. Keller, citing his strong leadership and vision, which was seen as a critique of Harry’s capabilities.

The fallout from this incident seems significant. Not only did Harry lose Germany as a key Invictus supporter, but morale within Invictus HQ is said to have plummeted, with some countries now reconsidering their participation in future games. Dr. Keller, on the other hand, reportedly made a smooth entrance into the same boardroom after Harry’s exit, impressing the German officials with his calm demeanor and quickly setting plans in motion for the new event.

This series of events, if true, paints a stark contrast between Harry’s leadership and that of Dr. Keller, with many praising the latter’s professionalism. Meanwhile, Harry’s reputation seems to be taking a hit, with rumors that corporate sponsors and media partners like Netflix and Spotify are becoming wary of his volatile behavior. The Invictus Games, once a symbol of Harry’s positive influence, now face a turbulent future amidst this internal crisis.