Frankie Bridge has spoken out against ‘horrible people’ in the industry (Picture: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)
Loose Women star Frankie Bridge has lifted the lid on fakery in showbiz by venting about celebrities ‘no one likes to work with’.

The former The Saturdays singer, 35, became a full-time panellist on the ITV daytime show in 2021 and has since sat behind the desk with the likes of Denise Welch and Ruth Langsford.

Frankie is hardly famous for inserting herself into drama, having managed to avoid any scandalous celeb bust-ups throughout her career, which began when she was a child and joined S Club Juniors.

That doesn’t mean she hasn’t had unpleasant run-ins, however, and has now launched a brutal rant about ‘horrible people’ in the industry.

In conversation with Spencer Matthews on his Big Fish podcast, the two discussed how imperative it is that you are ‘easy to work with’ in a business full of big characters.

Spencer began: ‘Some people have reputations for being really horrible people and I’ve always found it incredibly odd that people would continue to work with horrible people.’

She became a Loose Woman in 2021 (Picture: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)
‘I think that’s been one of my biggest things over the years, is that I’ve met a lot of those people,’ Frankie replied.

The Up hitmaker recalled: ‘I remember when I finished with S Club Juniors, Simon Fuller said to me, “Always continue to be good to work with, like you are, because everyone’s always going to then continue to want to work with you,” and it really stuck with me.’

Frankie went on to hint at difficult moments in her own working life.

‘I’ve had moments throughout my career… you know, you always say the good guy comes out on top, and I think as I got older, I was like, “That’s not actually necessarily true,” and it really p****d me off.

‘I’ve sat at awards ceremonies knowing that there’s people winning these awards that everyone in the room hates working with, and they get up and they spout this speech about loving everyone, and being kind, and all that b******t and I’m like, “You’re lying! Everyone in here hates you!”

‘Yet they’re all standing up clapping and going, “Yeah!”, and posting about it, and I think that’s what helps me as well, because I know the b******t.’

Frankie attended the NTAs just days ago (Picture: Joe Maher/Getty Images for the NTAs)
Frankie stated that she ‘doesn’t necessarily buy into it’, but stressed the importance of being ‘aware’ of two-faced individuals so she can stay grounded.

The last major ceremony Frankie attended was just this week when she walked the red carpet at the National Television Awards alongside co-stars.

Billed as one of the biggest nights in British TV, the awards handed out gongs to the likes of Ant and Dec, who continued their best presenter winning streak, while Mr Bates vs The Post Office took home three gongs.

Alas, Loose Women lost out in the daytime category, as Bradley Walsh-fronted game show The Chase secured the trophy.

Frankie, who is married to ex-professional footballer Wayne Bridge, 44, has been a regular on Loose Women for the past four years.

Despite initially having concerns about joining the programme, Frankie previously said she hasn’t had any rows with colleagues while cameras were off.

Loose Women has been plagued by ‘feud’ rumours for years (Picture: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)

The former pop star has insisted she gets on with everyone (Picture: Ken McKay/ITV/Shutterstock)
‘My friends asked me about [the rumoured rows],’ she told Fabulous Magazine after Coleen Nolan took legal action in light of claims certain stars wouldn’t work with her.

‘I genuinely don’t experience it or see it,’ Frankie stated.

‘When I first went on the show, I was nervous because I’ve read about all these feuds.’

She added: ‘Everyone always wants women to fight and it’s a real shame that it undoes all the good that Loose Women does.

In a stunning turn of events, Meghan Markle is reportedly fuming after King Charles made the controversial decision to remove Prince Harry from his role as a councillor of state.

This quiet yet significant change, enacted through the Councillors of State Act 2022, has sparked intense reactions from the Duchess of Sussex, who has not held back in expressing her discontent.

The councillors of state play a crucial role, stepping in to perform royal duties when the monarch is unable to do so.

In a stunning turn of events, Meghan Markle is reportedly fuming after King Charles made the controversial decision to remove Prince Harry from his role as a councillor of state.

This quiet yet significant change, enacted through the Councillors of State Act 2022, has sparked intense reactions from the Duchess of Sussex, who has not held back in expressing her discontent.

The councillors of state play a crucial role, stepping in to perform royal duties when the monarch is unable to do so.

This includes attending privy council meetings and signing official documents.

Traditionally, this position has been reserved for the monarch’s spouse and the first four successors over the age of 21.

However, recent changes have altered the landscape, now limiting the role to only working members of the royal family.

This shift has left Prince Harry out in the cold, especially following his decision to step back from royal duties.

The exclusion stems from concerns surrounding Prince Andrew’s association with Jeffrey Epstein, which has further complicated the eligibility criteria for councillors.

Meghan is reportedly furious about this development, issuing stern warnings to King Charles in hopes of restoring her husband’s position.

An insider close to the Sussexes revealed that Meghan is not just upset; she is determined to fight for Harry’s reappointment.

She fears that this change could hinder Harry’s ability to support the king during critical times, potentially jeopardizing the security of the royal family.

Her anger is palpable, as she perceives this move as a direct attack on Harry’s standing within the royal household.

Despite Meghan’s efforts, the monarchy appears firm in its decision.

A palace representative emphasized that the modifications were made to enhance the efficiency of royal operations.

The role of councillors of state is vital, and ensuring that these duties are performed by fully engaged members of the family is seen as essential for maintaining the monarchy’s integrity.

The decision to limit this role to active royals was not taken lightly.

It reflects a broader strategy to streamline royal functions and ensure that those in positions of authority are fully committed to their responsibilities.

This careful consideration underscores the importance of stability and effective governance within the monarchy.

While Meghan’s frustration is understandable, the monarchy’s leadership is focused on what they believe to be the best path forward.

They argue that such decisions are made with the long-term health of the institution in mind, balancing the needs of the royal family with public expectations.

As tensions rise, it remains to be seen how this situation will unfold.

Meghan’s determination to challenge the decision highlights her unwavering commitment to her husband and their place within the royal framework.

Yet, the palace’s steadfastness suggests a significant rift may be forming between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.

This episode serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in royal life, where personal feelings often clash with institutional protocols.

The stakes are high, and both sides are poised to defend their positions vigorously.

Ultimately, the future of Prince Harry’s role within the monarchy hangs in the balance, with Meghan leading the charge for change.

Prince William Shuts Down Meghan Markle’s Shocking Demand for a Royal Title Amid Blackmail Claims!

 

Is Meghan Markle trying to manipulate King Charles into granting her the title of Princess of Wales? Recent reports suggest she has made some extravagant demands, including a grand return to the UK with Archie and Lilibet under specific conditions. Additionally, Meghan reportedly desires a luxurious castle and a significant financial settlement. According to royal insiders, Meghan’s latest ultimatum involves taking over Princess Catherine’s role, which comes with high public visibility and, of course, the coveted title of Princess of Wales. It seems Meghan sees this as the perfect way to re-enter the UK, potentially stepping into a position she is allegedly envious of. 

Royal expert Angela Levin has revealed that Meghan will not return unless she receives the title and its associated benefits. This has fueled speculation about Meghan’s jealousy towards Princess Catherine. Levin claims that Meghan is not only after a prestigious title but also a luxurious home and substantial financial support. This is particularly surprising given Meghan’s previous dissatisfaction with not being compensated for her royal duties.

Meanwhile, Prince Harry appears to be seeking advice from former aides on how to reestablish himself within the royal family. This suggests that life in sunny California may not be as fulfilling as they had hoped. The dreams of independence, lucrative Netflix deals, and multi-million-dollar interviews might not be as satisfying as they once imagined. Angela Levin has criticized Harry for wanting to play the victim while still expecting the royal family to embrace him again. Levin points out that the late Queen Elizabeth II was clear about the rules—no half-in, half-out Royals—but Harry seems to have overlooked that message, still hoping for a balance between his old life and newfound independence.

As for Meghan’s aspirations to become Princess of Wales, is she genuinely trying to pressure King Charles into granting her Princess Catherine’s title for a grand comeback? Reports suggest there might be some truth to this intention. Levin argues that Meghan’s desire to take Catherine’s place stems from jealousy and her ambitions to become a global brand and influencer. Facing significant obstacles, Meghan seems to be targeting the role that could provide the fame and recognition she longs for.

Let’s not forget that Meghan and Harry once envisioned themselves as Royals without the mundane responsibilities—traveling the world, being adored, and influencing global matters. Meghan’s love for the limelight is evident, while Harry appears to yearn for the simplicity of royal life. Levin suggests that Meghan has no intention of returning to the UK unless her status is significantly elevated.

Prince William reportedly has little interest in Meghan’s plans and has already barred Harry from rejoining the royal family. It seems unlikely that Meghan’s hopes of exchanging titles with Catherine will gain any traction. William remains focused on his royal duties and has little patience for Harry’s victim narrative or Meghan’s seemingly unreasonable demands. Levin also notes that Meghan’s public relations issues are mounting, with her recent loss of a head of PR adding another setback to her global brand aspirations. Meanwhile, long-serving royal staff continue their loyalty, making Meghan’s frequent employee turnover look even more questionable.

With the California project facing challenges and a return to the UK hindered by royal resistance, it’s uncertain what the future holds for Meghan and Harry. If Meghan cannot attain the title of Princess of Wales and the royal lifestyle she desires, speculation about their next move remains rife.

For quite some time now, journalist and media personality Megyn Kelly, who presently hosts a talk show and podcast, has been dabbling in controversy. As we all know how blunt she is; remember her recent bold comments about star Erin Moriarty?

The talk show host charged the actress with having plastic surgery on her face after comparing an old and a newer picture of her. Having said that, Kelly’s critical remarks did not target just her. Her opinions on a variety of celebrities led to her being highlighted in tabloid stories. She has made some hurtful comments and started outright feuds on multiple occasions.

Megyn Kelly (Credit: / SiriusXM)

But, prior to criticizing Moriarty for allegedly having plastic surgery, the former Fox News anchor reiterated her contempt for Meghan Markel, the Duchess of Sussex. Let us go back and see how Kelly subtly schooled the wife of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex before her comments about the actress made headlines.

“She still says she’s not proud of America”: Megyn Kelly Brought Up Jane Fonda’s Controversial Past Over Bruised Ego After Making Her Disdain for Plastic Surgery Public

Erin Moriarty is retaliating against online trolling and criticism regarding rumors that she has had plastic surgery, which came from former Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly (via CBR). After the actress posted some new photos and videos to Instagram, some fans even began to argue that her cheekbones and face shape had changed.

However, the controversy has now grown even more since Kelly chose to voice her opinion on the matter (for whatever reason). The journalist revealed her surprise at seeing a recent photo of Moriarty on her podcast, The Megyn Kelly Show:

“I thought it was a face generated by artificial intelligence, but apparently it’s real. I find it a sign of mental illness. It’s extremely upsetting. It discourages me enormously. I just really want to get into the heads of these young girls and say, ‘Please don’t do this.’”

Erin Moriarty as Starlight in

Moriarty chose to address the accusations on her Instagram account before deleting it. She criticized the journalist’s approach, alleging that she had contrasted an old, ten-year-old photo of herself with a recent one. She clarified that she had only applied cosmetics.

“I put on makeup that day, and it involves major contouring, and I remember leaving and feeling pretty…I saw the comments, scathing enough to turn my comments off.”

The journalist has never refrained from expressing her opinions over the years, even when they are sometimes harsh. That being said, there have been other occasions in which she has made offensive comments and ignited major arguments.

“Barbie was just not a very good movie”: Amid Erin Moriarty Feud, Megyn Kelly’s Hot Take on Margot Robbie’s Oscar Snub Might Upset You Even More

Megyn Kelly was discussing Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, just like the rest of the world, but not in a good way. She seemed to be irritated and demanded that the Duchess of Sussex stop calling Prince Harry “” (via the NY Post).

Kelly called Markle a ” on her SiriusXM podcast The Megyn Kelly Show, and she became agitated when Markle kept bringing up her marriage to the British royal family. The former Fox News host said for the couple;

“There seems to be no limit on their appetite for ripping on the royals to whom they owe all of their fame and literally most of their fortune.”

Meghan Markle as Rachel Zane in

According to Kelly, Markle’s approval rating in the UK is In addition, she referred to the Duchess of Sussex as a “” for her assertion that she did not do any research on the royal family prior to her marriage to Prince Harry in 2018.

Kelly then pointed out that Markle called Prince Harry “” in an episode of the latter’s podcast when she was “

“Some of us wants to be shamed”: Megyn Kelly Asked Her Step Father to Fat Shame Her and Fans Didn’t Appreciate Her Controversial Take

Not only that, but Kelly also voiced her thoughts about Markle’s decision to skip King Charles III’s coronation in May 2023, as The Daily Mail reported. She remarked:

“I’m glad she’s [Markle] not going. Who wants to sit and look at her try to pretend like she’s there in any way supportive of the royal family? She hates them, despite the fact that they made her a megastar.”

Well, Kelly never appears content when talking about Markle. However, it appears that this is merely one viewpoint. It does not seem like Prince Harry’s wife has responded to the podcast host’s criticism of her.

In a startling twist, former Duchess Meghan Markle finds herself embroiled in yet another controversy, this time involving a heated exchange…

In a startling twist, former Duchess Meghan Markle finds herself embroiled in yet another controversy, this time involving a heated exchange with none other than King Charles himself. Reports have surfaced, suggesting that Meghan, feeling rejected and marginalized by the British Monarchy, allegedly made threats against the future King.

The situation took a sharp turn when King Charles purportedly burned a letter from Meghan without even bothering to peruse its contents. This dramatic episode has only fueled tensions and further intensified the ongoing controversy surrounding Meghan. As critics question her motives, her fans rally to support her.

According to undisclosed sources, Meghan Markle, who rose to fame following her marriage to Prince Harry, allegedly vented her frustration and anger towards King Charles, expressing her discontent with her treatment within the royal family.

 

While the exact nature of these threats remains unclear, they have undoubtedly sent shockwaves through the corridors of the British Monarchy. Critics argue that Meghan’s behavior demonstrates a lack of respect for the institution she once vowed to uphold, while her supporters claim that her alleged threats are a desperate cry for justice and acceptance. 

Adding fuel to the fire, reports suggest that King Charles took a provocative step by burning Meghan Markle’s letter without even bothering to read its contents. This contentious act has been interpreted as a deliberate snub, further widening the rift between the royal family and the outspoken former Duchess.

Critics argue that burning the letter without giving it a fair chance only serves to perpetuate the narrative that the monarchy is unwilling to listen to Meghan’s concerns. Meanwhile, supporters of the royal family view this act as a necessary response to Meghan’s alleged threats and a means of safeguarding the dignity of the crown.

The events surrounding Meghan Markle’s alleged threats and the burning of her letter have triggered a wave of polarized opinions among the public. Online platforms have become hotbeds of discussion and debate, with users passionately defending or condemning the actions of both Meghan and the royal family.

YouTube channels dedicated to covering the latest developments have witnessed a surge in viewership, as individuals eagerly consume content that aligns with their preconceived notions.

Critics argue that Meghan’s alleged threats demonstrate a sense of entitlement and a willingness to disrupt the established order. They question her intentions and argue that her actions undermine the traditions and values of the British Monarchy.

On the other hand, supporters of Meghan contend that she has been unjustly treated by the royal family and the British media. They believe that her alleged threats are a desperate response to a system that failed to protect her and her mental well-being.

The alleged threats made by Meghan Markle against King Charles and the subsequent burning of her letter have thrust the former Duchess back into the spotlight, reigniting the controversy that has surrounded her since her marriage to Prince Harry. This episode has further divided public opinion and intensified the ongoing debate surrounding Meghan’s place within the British Monarchy.

As the world watches and waits for the next chapter in this unfolding drama, it remains to be seen whether reconciliation or further conflict lies ahead. One thing is certain, however: the controversy surrounding Meghan Markle shows no signs of abating anytime soon.

Shocking Revelation: Meghan Markle’s 10-Day Yacht Trip with Epstein in Italy Exposed by Karyna Shuliak

In a dramatic twist that rivals any high-stakes thriller, Meghan Markle’s connections to the world of high-profile scandals have resurfaced with a vengeance. According to YouTuber Paula M, a shocking conspiracy has emerged involving Meghan Markle, Sarah Ferguson, and some of the most notorious figures in scandalous history. 

Imagine a cold winter evening a decade ago, when Meghan Markle, then an aspiring actress with a penchant for high-profile connections, met with Sunday People journalist Katie Hines. Her goal was to gain media attention and make a splash in the UK. However, the meeting was far from glamorous. Markle, amid a divorce and struggling with her personal life, appeared unimpressive and subdued. During this encounter, Markle’s interest in prominent figures, such as footballer Ashley Cole, emerged—a fascination that would eventually lead her to Prince Harry.

The plot thickens when Paula M shifts focus to a legal twist involving Virginia Roberts, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual misconduct. In a surprising development, Roberts’ lawyer suggested that Meghan Markle might be called to testify. The reasoning: Markle, with her close ties to Prince Andrew, might possess crucial information about his behavior. Despite Markle’s reputation for dishonesty, this claim hints at a deeper, darker connection between her and the royal scandal.

The intrigue continues as Paula M reveals Sarah Ferguson’s involvement in this web of deceit. Known for her controversial and often questionable behavior, Ferguson has been a recurring figure in royal scandals, from borrowing money from Jeffrey Epstein to participating in dubious events. Paula M delves into the shadows, alleging that Ferguson’s manipulative strategies played a role in introducing Meghan Markle to the royal scene. According to this narrative, Ferguson used her connections to further infiltrate the royal family, leveraging ties with figures like Epstein and Harvey Weinstein. This dark influence, combined with Markle’s own ambitions, is said to have tarnished the royal family’s image.

The narrative takes another dramatic twist with the revelation that Meghan Markle’s association with figures like Jeffrey Epstein’s former girlfriend, Karina Shuliak, is more than coincidental. Shuliak, known for her close ties with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, reportedly traveled exclusively with Epstein and his associates. Paula M suggests that Markle’s connection with Shuliak indicates deeper entanglements with Epstein’s circles, raising questions about her true role in these scandalous networks.

In a chilling climax, Paula M exposes potential financial motivations behind Markle’s actions. Allegedly, Markle’s earnings from her role in *Suits* were modest compared to the wealth she accumulated from her yachting trip. The suggestion that Markle’s lifestyle and connections were financially motivated adds another layer to the already murky narrative.

The pièce de résistance of Paula M’s assertion is that both Sarah Ferguson and Meghan Markle have used their positions to hold the royal family hostage. According to Paula M, Ferguson’s ongoing residence in the Royal Lodge and Markle’s manipulative tactics have placed the royal family in a precarious position. The narrative concludes with a call for reform within the royal family to prevent such manipulative figures from influencing its members.