In a surprising development within the British royal family, Princess Anne has officially taken over the royal duties previously held by Queen Camilla. The shift in responsibilities has sparked widespread speculation and intrigue, particularly regarding the reasons behind Camilla’s step back from her royal obligations. While Buckingham Palace has yet to provide a detailed explanation, insiders suggest that this decision might have been influenced by a combination of personal and health-related factors.

Princess Anne, known for her unwavering dedication and tireless work ethic, is widely regarded as one of the hardest-working members of the royal family. Her assumption of Camilla’s duties signals a significant shift in the distribution of responsibilities within the monarchy. Anne has always been a steadfast figure in the royal family, often taking on demanding roles with a no-nonsense approach. Her willingness to step in during this crucial time reflects her deep commitment to the monarchy and her readiness to support King Charles in maintaining the stability and continuity of royal functions.

As for Queen Camilla, the decision to step back has led to much speculation. Some reports suggest that Camilla may be facing health challenges that have made it difficult for her to fulfill the rigorous demands of her royal duties. Others believe that she might be seeking a quieter life, away from the public eye, especially as she advances in age. Regardless of the reasons, Camilla’s reduced role marks a notable change in the royal family’s dynamics, particularly as she has been a prominent figure since her marriage to King Charles.

The public’s reaction to this change has been mixed. Many have expressed admiration for Princess Anne’s willingness to take on additional responsibilities, viewing her as a reliable and capable royal who has always put duty first. On the other hand, there is concern and empathy for Queen Camilla, with many hoping that her decision to step back will allow her to focus on her well-being.

This transition in royal duties also raises questions about the future of the monarchy and how roles will continue to evolve under King Charles’s reign. With Princess Anne now taking on a more prominent position, it is clear that the royal family is adapting to new circumstances, ensuring that the demands of royal duties are met even as members of the family age or face personal challenges.

As the public and the media continue to speculate on the reasons behind this significant change, one thing remains certain: Princess Anne’s dedication and reliability will ensure that the monarchy remains steady during this period of transition. Meanwhile, all eyes will be on Queen Camilla as she navigates this new chapter in her life, with the hope that she finds peace and contentment in her decision to step back.

“We get it, you bagged the gorilla. Congratulations, you got the big bear [and] you want us all to know,” the talk show host said.

The comments came one day after Meghan offered a glimpse at her home life with Harry. “It does, it feels like a whirlwind,” the Suits alum, who shares 3-year-old son Archie and daughter Lili, 16 months, with the Duke of Sussex, explained during the Tuesday, November 1, episode of her “Archetypes” podcast. “I make breakfast for all three of them. It’s very important to me. I love doing it. To me, it just feels like the greatest way to start the morning.”

Meghan admitted she was expecting her morning routing to “only get more chaotic” as her kids get older. “But for me, it’s, you know, both monitors on for the kids to hear them, always up with Lili, get her downstairs, then a half hour later, Archie’s up,” she continued. “I start doing his lunchbox right before he’s up while I have her, getting her a little nibble. My husband’s helping me get him downstairs.”

The Bench author, who married Harry in 2018, gushed about how her view on life has changed since expanding her family. “I first just had Archie, now I’m a mom of a daughter,” she said. “And whether I thought it was going to happen or not, it did. I see the world differently through how [Lili] is going to see the world and how she is going to look at certain women as role models.”

Loose Women star Andrea McLean has opened up about her health battle which forced her into giving her then-boyfriend an ultimatum, admitting the diagnosis felt like a “tsunami”

Andrea McLean is a regular on the Loose Women panel (
Image: ITV)

Loose Women panellist Andrea McLean admitted a devastating health diagnosis led her to give her then-boyfriend an ultimatum.

Andrea, 54, opened up to Giovanna Fletcher about her battle with endometriosis and how it changed her outlook on life.

The condition sees cells similar to those in the lining of the uterus grow in other parts of the body. Among the symptoms are difficulties in getting pregnant.

Recalling how a doctor told her “it would be a miracle if you have a baby” when she was diagnosed, Andrea told the Happy Mum Happy Baby podcast: “[I felt] like I’d been punched. And I remember leaving the room in the hospital and for the first time noticing mother care. And for the first time noticing mums with rams and toddlers. And it was like this tsunami of need.”

At the time, Andrea was in an 11-year relationship with boyfriend Nick Green. She recalled returning home and waiting for him to arrive to deliver the news.

She explained: “I said, ‘if I’m going to have children, I need to start thinking about it soon because once I get into my 30s [she was 28/29 at the time] it will get harder the longer I leave it. And we’ve been together 11 years now so I think maybe we should start thinking about this.

Angela McLean with ex-husband Nick Green ( 
Image:
GETTY)

Andrea has been married to Nick Feeney since 2017 ( 
Image:
GETTY)
“And he’s like, ‘well I don’t even know if I want to marry you’. So I did what I wouldn’t necessarily recommend my own kids do and gave him an ultimatum. I said, ‘you’ve got six months to make your mind up.

“‘And I’m not going to push anybody into anything. But you’ve got six months. And if you really think this isn’t for me, then we go our separate ways. But if not, brilliant, we join hands and we do this thing’.”

The ultimatum worked with Andrea and Nick married in Kenya in 2000 before welcoming their son, Finlay, the following year. But it wasn’t easy.

“It [the marriage] started a whole rollercoaster of trying naturally for 18 months, two years, and then IVF and then eventually had my son.”

Andrea and Nick divorced in 2005, after she admitted having an affair with fellow Our House presenter Steve Toms. She had a daughter, Amy, with Steve in 2006 before the pair married in 2009. They divorced three years later.

She married her current husband Nick Feeney in 2017, having met on a blind date set up by a Loose Women make-up artist.

The decision from Meghan could be a “nuclear explosion” for the royals as relations between the Sussexes and the family remain tense.

Meghan’s move was branded a ‘dreadful mistake’ (Image: Getty)

Meghan Markle has come under fire for an “absolutely tasteless” move that coincided with a tough day for the Royal Family.

On the weekend, Meghan made an appearance at Oprah Winfrey’s book club session in California.

She attended the event on the eve of the two-year anniversary Queen Elizabeth II’s death.

Speaking to GB News, royal biographer Richard Fitzwilliam branded this a “dreadful mistake”.

He said: “I think it was an absolutely dreadful choice of venue to appear at, especially on a very special anniversary.

Queen Elizabeth II passed away two years ago (Image: Getty)

“I mean, we all know that when Meghan and Harry gave the interview on Oprah, which is infamous.

“Although they didn’t plan this, by the time the interview aired, Prince Philip was in hospital. We know that he died shortly afterwards.

“We also know that the interview was like exploding a nuclear weapon in the courtyard of Buckingham Palace.

“What is remembered is that the Queen’s comments. ‘Some recollections may vary’ sums it up very well. But that was absolutely tasteless place to be seen.

“We know that Meghan and Oprah are friends, but to be seen in a place which brought back memories of that interview on that anniversary is just extraordinary.”

 

Oprah interviewed Meghan and Harry back in 2021 (Image: Getty)

 SUBSCRIBE
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

While at the book club meeting, Meghan said: “I’m looking at this time as my chapter of joy.

“The more you can look at your life and really, truly recognise and be able to be grateful for your life – you have to be grateful for all aspects of it.

“My intentionality is to enjoy this chapter and be able to love through every piece of this as best we can.”

Oprah Winfrey interviewed Meghan and Prince Harry in 2021 when they made a number of critical remarks about their time in the Royal Family.

Camilla’s friendship with Diana and promoting the relationship between the late Princess and Prince Charles was actually a hidden dark plot.

The love triangle between Prince Charles, Princess Diana and Camilla has always been a topic that attracts public attention. Although Princess Diana passed away 21 years ago and Prince Charles was able to marry the person he loved, the stories surrounding this love triangle have never stopped.

The late Princess Diana once announced to the media about her husband’s extramarital affair with the famous saying “there were three of us in this marriage, so it was quite cramped”. Princess Diana even shared that she accidentally overheard a phone conversation between Prince Charles and his lover Camilla.

 

At that time, Prince Charles was in the bathroom and said: “No matter what happens, I will always love you.”

Camilla was the third person to interfere in Princess Diana’s dreamlike marriage.

Not only did they often communicate intimately with each other, Prince Charles also sent many gifts to his lover despite the fact that he was a husband and a father.

However, few people expected that Camilla was the one who encouraged the relationship between Prince Charles and Diana Spencer when the two were getting to know each other and Camilla was a married woman at that time.

However, according to Camilla’s brother-in-law, Richard Parker Bowles, Camilla “in fact encouraged the relationship between Charles and Diana because she thought Diana was useless and would not cause any harm.”

In her recent biography, “The Duchess of Cornwall: Camilla’s Story and Secrets,” author Jessica Jayne asserts that “Camilla never saw Diana as a threat and believed that Princess Diana was someone Camilla could manipulate.”

 

Camilla once considered Diana useless and easy to manipulate.

When the relationship between Charles and Diana was blossoming, Camilla tried to please Diana. The two women even had a time of being close to each other, going to lunch together when Prince Charles was busy with work.

However, after Diana married Prince Charles, Camilla really revealed her true nature. In 1994, Prince Charles admitted to having an affair and in 1996, he and Princess Diana officially divorced, ending their 15-year marriage.

With the shocking revelations about Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall once again made the public even more angry. Although during this time, the British Royal Family and even the Queen have greatly improved Camilla’s image in the public’s eyes. However, no matter what, Camilla cannot erase the traces of being the third person destroying the happiness of another family.

Meghan Markle Humiliated at TIFF: Rebel Wilson Calls Her ‘Barren Duchess’

The glitz and glamour of the red carpet can be thrilling—filled with the excitement of celebrity encounters, stunning gowns, and the buzz of upcoming films. But sometimes, the drama that unfolds is far from the sparkle and shine. Such was the case during the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF), where Meghan Markle found herself at the center of an unexpected and uncomfortable incident. 

The moment caught the attention of the media and sparked a whirlwind of reactions across social platforms. So, grab your popcorn as we dive into this captivating tale of royal intrigue, celebrity clashes, and an unforgettable red carpet moment.

TIFF is renowned for attracting top celebrities and filmmakers from around the globe. This year was no different, with a plethora of stars walking the red carpet for the premiere of a highly anticipated film featuring a dynamic ensemble cast. Among the attendees was Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, who made her way back into the spotlight after stepping back from royal duties.

Dressed in a stunning emerald gown that hugged her figure elegantly, Meghan appeared poised and radiant as she greeted fans and the press. Her presence on the red carpet was a reminder of her status as a global icon—beloved by many and scrutinized by just as many.

What happened next was unexpected and left attendees buzzing. As Meghan mingled, she approached Rebel Wilson, the beloved actress known for her hilarious roles and vibrant personality. Rebel had recently welcomed her first child, a one-year-old daughter, and was beaming with pride.

The two exchanged pleasantries, and in a moment of warmth, Meghan reached out to hold Rebel’s daughter. However, what started as a friendly gesture took a sharp turn. Rebel, known for her humor but also her fierce protectiveness over her family, reacted immediately. With a playful yet firm tone, she exclaimed, “Don’t touch my child. The barren Duchess is not carrying my baby.”

The words hung in the air, and the crowd went silent in disbelief. In an instant, the atmosphere shifted. What could have been a heartwarming moment of connection between two stars morphed into a public spectacle. Cameras flashed as reporters captured the scene, and social media lit up with reactions.

Some defended Rebel’s protective instincts, while others criticized her for being overly harsh. Memes began to circulate, and hashtags like #BarrenDuchess and #DontTouchMyChild trended on Twitter within hours. Meghan, visibly taken aback, managed to regain her composure but couldn’t shake off the awkwardness of the moment. Her smile faltered, and the confidence she exuded moments before seemed to wane.

To truly understand the intensity of this moment, it’s important to delve into the backgrounds of both women. Meghan Markle, once an actress herself, transitioned into a royal lifestyle that came with its own set of expectations and challenges. Since stepping back from royal duties, she has focused on charitable endeavors and personal projects, often facing scrutiny for her choices.

On the other hand, Rebel Wilson has built her career on breaking stereotypes, using her platform to advocate for body positivity and inclusivity. Her journey into motherhood has also been a topic of conversation, as she has openly shared her experiences with fertility struggles.

This context adds layers to the incident, showcasing the pressures both women face in the public eye. As the incident unfolded, social media became a battleground of opinions. Supporters of Meghan rallied to her defense, calling out Rebel for her comments and defending the Duchess’s right to engage with children. Tweets like #LeaveMeghanAlone and #RebelShouldApologize flooded timelines.

Conversely, Rebel’s fans praised her for standing her ground and protecting her child. A mother’s instinct is powerful, and #TeamRebel became a common sentiment.

The red carpet drama at TIFF has become a new chapter in the ongoing saga of public figures and their interactions. As Meghan Markle and Rebel Wilson navigate the fallout from this incident, it serves as a reminder of the unpredictable nature of celebrity events and the intense scrutiny that accompanies them.

Kate Middleton Reveals Hidden Tensions Between Camilla and Prince William That Almost Ruined Their Marriage

On November 16, 2010, Prince William and Kate Middleton posed for photos in the State Apartments of St. James’s Palace in London, marking a historic moment.  After much speculation, Clarence House confirmed today the engagement of Prince William to Kate Middleton. The couple is set to marry in either the spring or summer of the following year, and they will continue to live in North Wales while Prince William serves as a search and rescue pilot for the RAF. 

After eight years of dating, the couple got engaged during a vacation in Kenya. Their engagement, like many royal engagements, captured the public’s imagination, with Prince William’s confession about a significant secret he kept from Kate Middleton adding to the intrigue.

Renowned author Robert Hardman describes the announcement of the royal engagement as the beginning of years of public anticipation. He explains that royal engagements often spark fascination with every detail, from the wedding dress design to the choice of bridesmaids and best man, and where the wedding will be broadcast.

When Prince William and Kate Middleton announced their engagement in November 2010, it created quite a stir. The couple shared details about their romantic Kenyan vacation, where William proposed using Princess Diana’s engagement ring. In an interview with Tom Bradby of ITV, William explained, as reported by OK Magazine, “It is the place my father took my brother and me shortly after our mother died. I couldn’t think of a better place to propose to Catherine than Kenya, so I got down on one knee there.” He added with a smile, “I knew if this thing disappeared, I’d be in a lot of trouble.”

The couple’s official engagement photograph was taken at St. James’s Palace by renowned photographer Mario Testino, who admitted he waited quite a while to capture the perfect shot. The iconic image highlighted the stunning engagement ring, which featured a large sapphire surrounded by 14 sparkling diamonds. The ring was resized by renowned jewelers G. Collins and Sons to fit Kate Middleton, adding a special touch to the memorable photograph.

Antonio Banderas made headlines with an explosive outburst at the Venice Film Festival, leading to a dramatic encounter with Prince Harry. In the glamorous world of film festivals where artistry often intersects with unexpected drama, few could have anticipated the confrontation that unfolded this year.

Dressed in a sleek tuxedo, Antonio Banderas, a seasoned star of international cinema, found himself in a heated exchange that left onlookers stunned. While signing autographs on the red carpet for his latest film, *Baby Girl*, Banderas’s demeanor shifted from charming to furious upon spotting Prince Harry. In a surprising turn of events, he angrily threw his pen toward the royal, sparking a firestorm of speculation about celebrity culture, loyalty, and the impact of personal choices in the public eye.

The Venice Film Festival is renowned not only for its films but also for attracting a myriad of dazzling personalities. On this particular day, amid the shouts of fans and the flash of cameras, Banderas was engaging warmly with admirers and showcasing the charisma that has endeared him to many. However, the atmosphere took a dramatic turn when Prince Harry appeared. Witnesses reported that Banderas’s reaction was one of disbelief and anger. He appeared genuinely shocked to see Harry and, in a moment of indignation, referred to him as a “traitor” before hurling his pen in the prince’s direction.

This incident has left many questioning what could have triggered such a reaction from the typically composed actor. The clash between Banderas and Harry is set against the backdrop of modern celebrity and royal life complexities. Prince Harry, once a beloved member of the British royal family, has faced intense scrutiny since stepping back from his royal duties and relocating to the United States. His revelations about his life within the monarchy, struggles with mental health, and candid discussions about racism have polarized public opinion. While some admire his courage, others view his actions as a betrayal of his royal heritage.

Antonio Banderas, embodying the passion and intensity of a true artist, has built a career on portraying characters with deep emotional struggles and complex moral dilemmas. For Banderas, Harry’s departure from royal responsibilities and his outspoken nature may have seemed at odds with the loyalty and dedication he values.

As news of the incident spread, media outlets quickly framed it as a dramatic confrontation between Hollywood and royalty. Social media erupted with reactions ranging from outrage to amusement. Memes depicting Banderas as a vigilante hero confronting perceived disloyalty circulated widely, while others criticized his impulsive behavior, arguing that he should have handled the situation with more grace. This episode highlights the often bizarre nature of celebrity culture, where raw emotion can quickly become public fodder.

The juxtaposition of Banderas’s passionate outburst against the backdrop of a prestigious film festival reveals the thin veneer of civility that often masks deeper societal tensions. At the heart of the incident is a discussion about loyalty—both personal and public. For many, loyalty to family, country, or tradition is paramount. Banderas’s outburst may reflect a broader sentiment among those who feel that Harry’s choices undermine these values. The concept of loyalty is complex, particularly in a world where personal happiness and public expectation frequently collide. Critics argue that Harry has turned his back on his family and the institution he was born into, viewing his actions as a betrayal of a longstanding legacy. Supporters, however, believe that true loyalty involves remaining true to oneself, even if it means diverging from tradition.

The reaction from Banderas can be seen as a microcosm of this larger debate, illustrating how public figures grapple with societal expectations. The emotional weight of these expectations can lead to explosive reactions, revealing the vulnerabilities of even the most polished celebrities.

In the days following the encounter, both Banderas and Prince Harry became the focus of discussions about celebrity behavior and accountability. Banderas issued a statement expressing regret for his outburst but maintained his stance on the importance of loyalty. Meanwhile, Prince Harry chose to concentrate on his philanthropic work and mental health advocacy, acknowledging the media frenzy but emphasizing his commitment to his new path and causes.

The fallout from the incident has sparked renewed interest in the lives of both men, prompting discussions about their journeys, struggles, and roles in contemporary society. This startling encounter transcends its immediate context, offering a lens through which to examine broader cultural shifts. It underscores the friction between traditional values and modern perspectives, raising questions about how we define loyalty and the sacrifices individuals make in pursuit of authenticity.

As we continue to follow the lives of both Banderas and Prince Harry, one thing remains clear: in the world of fame, nothing is ever quite as it seems. Every encounter can reveal profound truths about the human condition, reminding us of the complexities of celebrity culture and the personal battles fought behind the scenes.

MEGHAN is ANGRY! Lilibet will not receive any royal inheritance because she was baptized in the United States instead of the United Kingdom.

“Meghan’s hopeless! Lilibet kicked out of succession line as a major exception after being baptized in the US.
– Advertisement –

The British royal family is no stranger to controversy, but the latest news surrounding the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has sent shockwaves through the monarchy. In a surprising turn of events, it has been revealed that Lilibet Diana, the youngest child of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, has been effectively removed from the line of succession to the British throne. But before we continue, please subscribe and turn on the notification bell for more updates.

The decision, which is being described as a major exception, was reportedly made after Lilibet’s christening took place in the United States rather than in the United Kingdom, as is customary for royal children. This move has not only sparked outrage among the couple’s supporters but has also raised questions about the future of the Sussex family’s relationship with the rest of the royal clan.

The announcement, which came via a statement from Buckingham Palace, has left many wondering what prompted such a drastic decision. According to the statement, Lilibet’s exclusion from the line of succession is due to the fact that her christening ceremony was held outside of the United Kingdom, a move that is seen as a breach of royal protocol.

“The decision to have Lilibet’s christening in the United States rather than in the United Kingdom has been viewed by the palace as a significant deviation from the traditional and expected path,” the statement read. “As a result, the Queen and the rest of the royal family have determined that it is necessary to remove Lilibet from the line of succession, effective immediately.”

The statement went on to explain that this action is being taken as a major exception to the established rules of succession, which typically stipulate that all legitimate descendants of the monarch are included in the line of succession, regardless of where they are born or christened.

“This is an unprecedented move, and one that the palace has not taken lightly,” the statement continued. “However, the Queen and the rest of the royal family feel that it is necessary to uphold the traditions and protocols of the monarchy, even in the face of evolving societal norms and expectations.”

The news has been met with a flurry of reactions, both from supporters of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and those who remain staunchly loyal to the monarchy. Some have criticized the decision as a blatant act of retaliation against the couple, who have been outspoken in their criticism of the royal family’s perceived shortcomings.

“This is nothing more than a petty and vindictive move by the palace,” said one Twitter user. “It’s clear that they are still trying to punish Harry and Meghan for daring to step away from royal life and speak their truth.”

Others, however, have defended the decision, arguing that the royal family is simply upholding the traditions and protocols that have sustained the monarchy for centuries.

“The royal family has a responsibility to maintain the integrity of the institution,” said a royal commentator. “While it may seem harsh, the decision to remove Lilibet from the line of succession is a necessary one in order to preserve the sanctity of the monarchy.”

Regardless of where one stands on the issue, it is clear that the fallout from this decision will be far-reaching. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have already expressed their displeasure, with a spokesperson stating that the family is deeply disappointed by the palace’s actions.

“This is yet another example of the royal family’s continued efforts to marginalize and ostracize the Duke and Duchess of Sussex,” the spokesperson said. “Lilibet is a full-fledged member of the royal family, and she deserves the same rights and privileges as any other grandchild of the Queen.”

The spokesperson went on to suggest that the decision could have far-reaching consequences for the monarchy’s relationship with the Sussex family, as well as the public’s perception of the institution as a whole.

“The royal family’s actions have not only damaged their own reputation, but they have also undermined the trust and faith that many people have in the monarchy,” the spokesperson said. “This decision will only serve to further divide the royal family and alienate the public.”

As the dust settles on this latest royal controversy, it remains to be seen how the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will respond and what impact this decision will have on the future of the monarchy. One thing is certain, however: the drama surrounding the House of Windsor is far from over.”

 

William’s TOUGH DECISION Leaves Queen Camilla in Tears

– Advertisement –

It seems like Prince William has made it pretty clear which side he’s on when it comes to Queen Camilla. Ever since Camilla entered the picture as Prince Charles’s partner, there have been a lot of ups and downs. People saw her as the one who pushed Princess Diana out of the spotlight, and some even speculated that she had something to do with Diana’s tragic accident. A lot of us remember that tense moment between Queen Camilla and Princess Kate Middleton at the queen’s funeral.

Apparently, Camilla gave Kate some advice on how to discipline her daughter, which didn’t go over well. It looks like the tension between them is still there. After a disagreement about some of Prince Harry’s comments on the queen, Kate has started to keep her distance from Camilla and isn’t being very warm toward her. Now, when you mix royal manners with family drama, things can get pretty complicated. Prince William is in a tough spot as he prepares to be king. He’s dealing with his wife, Kate, who’s been having some health problems, his dad, King Charles, who is struggling with cancer, and a rocky relationship with his brother, Prince Harry. Each of these issues brings its own challenges and emotional stress. Despite all of this, William is reportedly trying to manage everything with a sense of responsibility and strength. Supporting his family, both personally and in his role as a future king remains a top priority for him.

However, his strained relationship with Harry adds another layer of difficulty. Some reports suggest that things are so tense between the brothers that William might not even have Harry at his coronation. There’s also speculation that the only way they might come back together would be at a sad event, like their father’s funeral if King Charles’ health gets worse.

‘Finished’: Prince William has axed Queen Camilla’s sister from the Duchy of Cornwall payroll as he assumes control of the estate

Prince William has pulled the financial rug out from underneath Queen Camilla’s sister, ending a 20-year association with the 75-year-old.

Prince William has axed Queen Camilla’s sister from the Duchy of Cornwall payroll, ending a 20-year association with the 75-year-old.

King Charles employed Annabel Elliot as chief estates designer after his marriage to Camilla in 2005.

Elliot was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to decorate and renew the Duchy’s heritage holiday homes in Cornwall, Wales and the Isles of Scilly.

The Prince of Wales, 42, assumed control of the Duchy of Cornwall, the Royal Family’s 700-year-old estate providing income to the heir, after Charles ascended the throne in 2022.

According to its latest Integrated Annual Report published on Wednesday, William has opted not to retain the Queen’s sister or her design services in the 2023-2024 year.

“During the period to 8th September 2022 the Duchy paid Mrs. Annabel Elliot, the 24th Duke of Cornwall’s sister-in-law, in the normal course of business and on an arm’s length basis £19,625 (AUD$38,558) for fees and commission and £12,316 (AUD$24,197) for the purchase of furniture, furnishings and retail stock for the Duchy of Cornwall Holiday accommodation, Duchy offices and Duchy Nursery,” the report said.

“At 31st March 2024, there was £nil (2023: £nil) [nothing] remaining payable to Mrs. Elliot in respect of these.”

Sources on Wednesday confirmed to The Telegraph that William chose not to continue Elliot’s employment, “although it is not a reflection of her work”.

The sources said the Queen’s sister was completing her work according to a “temporary contract” and it had simply “finished”.

They also said Duchy staff “no longer needed” the 75-year-old’s “guidance”.

It’s understood Elliot was paid “in the normal course of business and on an arm’s length basis” for her work.

He remuneration included “fees and commission” and reimbursement for the “purchase of furniture, furnishings and retail stock”.

She reportedly did not have any competition for the job, with the duchy previously stating its design contracts were not open to bid on.

The move comes during William’s first full year managing the estate as the new Duke of Cornwall.

He received $30 million from his first full year’s income from the duchy.

The sum mostly covers the annual official, charitable and private costs for himself, his wife Princess Catherine and their three children Prince George, 11, Princess Charlotte, nine, and Prince Louis, six.

William reportedly pays income tax on money he receives from the duchy excluding household costs but he has not disclosed the tax bill like his father has historically done.