Step into the world of royal drama and celebrity antics, where the unexpected is just part of the package.

Recently, the US Open, a premier tennis championship celebrated worldwide, took center stage not only for the thrilling matches but also for a jaw-dropping incident involving Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex.

While the tournament was filled with elite athletes and Hollywood stars showcasing their latest fashion, it was what happened off the court that truly stole the spotlight.

A Shocking Encounter at the US Open: Meghan Markle Slaps a Child

Step into the world of royal drama and celebrity antics, where the unexpected is just part of the package.

Recently, the US Open, a premier tennis championship celebrated worldwide, took center stage not only for the thrilling matches but also for a jaw-dropping incident involving Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex.

While the tournament was filled with elite athletes and Hollywood stars showcasing their latest fashion, it was what happened off the court that truly stole the spotlight.

Picture this: Meghan Markle strides into the venue with an air of confidence, as if the arena were her own personal playground.

Given her celebrity status, one might say it almost feels that way.

However, the atmosphere shifted dramatically when a young fan, no older than ten, approached her eagerly for a high-five.

Instead of the expected warm gesture, Meghan responded in a shocking manner—she slapped the child across the face.

Yes, you read that right.

This moment transformed from a sweet encounter to a bewildering spectacle in the blink of an eye.

Now, I’ve seen my fair share of bizarre moments in the realm of fame and politics, but this one takes the cake.

From celebrities breaking down on live TV to outlandish statements from politicians, nothing could compare to witnessing a royal figure strike a child.

It’s as if the usual excitement of the US Open, even its famed concession stands, paled in comparison to this unexpected turn of events.

But wait, there’s more to this story.

Among the audience, taking in the scene, was none other than Stephen Colbert, the reigning king of late-night television.

Known for his sharp wit and humorous critiques of public figures, Colbert has seen it all.

Yet, even he seemed taken aback by Meghan’s outrageous act.

Instead of chuckling at the absurdity, he stood up and shouted, “Remove her at once!

Summon security!” Can you imagine?

The comedian known for his biting humor suddenly morphing into a guardian of decency.

This scenario is reminiscent of a school principal stepping in during a cafeteria food fight—both comical and unsettling.

Here we have Meghan Markle, who has often spoken about the struggles of her public life, now caught in a moment where she physically assaulted a child who simply sought an autograph.

Meanwhile, Colbert, a man whose career thrives on poking fun at authority, felt compelled to intervene.

It’s a perplexing juxtaposition of roles.

Let’s take a moment to digest the absurdity of it all.

A child, likely just wanting to share a moment with a celebrity, ended up on the receiving end of an unwarranted slap.

What message does that send?

This isn’t just an odd occurrence in the celebrity sphere; it highlights a deeper issue.

We must confront the reality that a child experienced physical violence at the hands of someone who is supposed to be a role model.

If a stranger had done the same on the street, there would be outrage.

Society would demand accountability, and rightly so.

Yet, here we are, discussing an incident involving a member of the royal family, and it raises serious questions about behavior and consequences.

The implications of such actions cannot be overlooked.

Meghan Markle’s slap is not merely a momentary lapse in judgment; it signifies a troubling trend in how public figures interact with their fans.

When a celebrity resorts to violence, it reflects poorly not just on them, but on the culture surrounding fame itself.

As this story continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the responsibility that comes with celebrity status.

It’s essential to hold individuals accountable, regardless of their position or title.

The world watched on September 19th as the British royal family gathered at Westminster Abbey to pay their final respects to Queen Elizabeth II. While it was undoubtedly a solemn occasion, expressions expert Jeremy Freeman claims to have witnessed some inter-family drama unfold during the televised ceremony.

King Charles III led the procession with his siblings Princess Anne and Prince Andrew behind him. Following close behind were his sons, Princes William and Harry, who walked side by side in an apparent act of reconciliation. Then came eight year-old Prince George and seven year-old Princess Charlotte, representing the next generation. As the only young royals in attendance, the pressure was on for George and Charlotte to comport themselves with the utmost dignity.

 

However, at one point Freeman asserts that Princess Charlotte appeared upset and shouted “ow” after her brother George pinched her. Ever the diplomate, Meghan Markle showed compassion for the children with an understanding smile according to Freeman’s reading of her expression. Meanwhile, Camilla was said to swoop into disciplinary mode, sternly commanding Princess Kate to “take her”.

While a minor squabble between siblings is to be expected, especially for royal children in such a highly stressful situation, Camilla’s harsh reaction seemed to only make matters worse. Kate appeared to calmly reassure her daughter with a comforting arm around her shoulders.

Later in the service, Freeman notes that Princess Charlotte appeared to be mentoring her brother George on royal protocol, reminding him to bow as the coffin passed by. To his credit, the young prince seemed to heed his sister’s advice. Their pairing provided a rare moment of levity in an otherwise solemn affair and served as a reminder of the monarchy’s future.

While family dynamics were understandably tense given the circumstances, there were also small acts of affection observed. At one point during the service, Princess Charlotte stumbled slightly as she bowed to her grandfather, the new King Charles III. Ever the benevolent matriarch, Queen Camilla was quick to compassionately reassure and embrace the distressed child. Freeman interprets this gesture as a loving olive branch extended to the next generation.

So in summary, the long televised event provided a unique front-row view into royal family relations. Minor squabbles unsurprisingly erupted between the two young siblings coping with enormous emotional pressure. However, subtle gestures also showed care, comfort and reconciliation unfolding both within the younger generation and between new Queen Camilla and her royal heirs.

In the days following the funeral, the royal rift narrative drew significant attention from both British tabloids and international media. Commentators reflected on whether petty arguments risked overshadowing the solemnity of the Queen’s farewell or whether they provided an air of authenticity and normalcy within a family mourning an immense loss together. Overall, most agreed the young royals comported themselves with remarkable dignity given the circumstances.

Privately, some speculated that tensions likely ran higher than the staid exterior suggested. Plagued for years by rumors of animosity, the reunion of Princes William and Harry, along with their spouses, was a closely watched subplot. Did the boys manage a true reconciliation as the expert lip readers concluded or were smiles merely for appearance’s sake? Only time will tell if family wounds have truly begun to heal.

Then there was the dynamic between Camilla and the Cambridge clan. While experts saw gestures of warmth, the Duchess of Cornwall’s harsh tone with Charlotte reignited gossip about a lingering chill with her step-children. Charles’ hopes for a united post-Elizabethan front will rely on building new bonds of trust between the generations.

For the modern monarchy to remain relevant, smooth succession of the crown relies on a congenial and cooperative extended family. As Britain mourned the only monarch most had known in their lifetime, behind closed abbey doors another transition was tentatively taking shape. From feuding heirs to compassionate patriarchs, the Windsors must continually refine their public personas. Whether recent reconciliations will stand the test of time remains to be seen.

Going forward, the new King Charles III era hinges on maintaining a charismatic yet stable family dynamic. Minor indiscretions fade from memory, but how the royals forge new relationships over the coming months and years will echo through the history books. As always, the glare of the global spotlight ensures their each gesture is dissected for deeper meaning. For now, he future of the British throne seems tentatively secured under the guidance of a King, two Princes and their watchful children. With perseverance and goodwill, this chapter of the royal saga appears set for a harmonious start.

Snooki Mocks Meghan Markle: Stirring Controversy on Social Media

 

Nicole Elizabeth LaValle, famously known as Snooki, is a well-known American reality TV personality recognized for her outspoken nature and tendency to court controversy.

The former Jersey Shore star recently found herself in the spotlight once again after taking a swipe at Meghan Markle on her Instagram page.

In a post that garnered over 200,000 likes, Snooki, a 35-year-old mother of three, shared a picture holding her youngest son, 5-year-old Angelo James, with a caption that read, “Meghan is this Archie?”

The post seemed to play on the rumors surrounding Meghan and Prince Harry’s son, Archie Harrison, suggesting that he might not be real.

The social media post from Snooki sparked a whirlwind of reactions among her 14 million followers.

While some commended her for her light-hearted take on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, others criticized her for what they perceived as insensitivity and contributing to baseless conspiracy theories.

One commenter expressed disappointment, stating, “Archie is a real child, and I’m disappointed to see Snooki contribute to these ridiculous rumors.”

Despite facing backlash, Snooki stood her ground and even used her son Angelo’s fifth birthday as an opportunity to take another dig at the royal family.

Sharing photos of Angelo, she captioned them with, “My little man is five.

Can you believe it?

Where does the time go?

Love you Angelo James, you’re the best thing that’s ever happened to me.

Meghan, this is what a real child looks like.”

This subtle jab further fueled speculations about Archie’s existence, which have lingered due to Meghan and Harry’s efforts to shield their son from the public eye.

Critics of Snooki have accused her of seeking attention and boosting her social media engagement by invoking Archie’s name in her posts.

Some have pointed out the irony in her actions, noting that she has been protective of her own children’s privacy.

One user highlighted the apparent hypocrisy, stating, “Maybe she should focus on her own family instead of sticking her nose where it doesn’t belong.”

In response to the ongoing controversy, Snooki doubled down on her comments during a recent interview, asserting that she was merely voicing what others were thinking.

She raised questions about Archie’s public visibility and the secrecy surrounding him, prompting further debate on the matter.

Despite the criticism, Snooki remained unfazed, emphasizing her role as a proud mother celebrating her son’s milestones and dismissing detractors who took issue with her statements.

As discussions surrounding the Archie conspiracy theories persist, Snooki’s willingness to court controversy and stand by her remarks remains evident.

While Meghan and Harry have yet to address Snooki’s comments publicly, it appears unlikely that they will dignify her claims with a formal response, given their focus on their family and the challenges of royal life.

The unfolding saga underscores Snooki’s penchant for stirring up debates and capturing attention, regardless of the repercussions.

In a surprising twist to royal traditions, Princess Anne was notably absent from the guest list during the baptism of her great-nephew, Prince George.

This event, which took place in 2013, has recently been highlighted by royal biographer Robert Jobson, who sheds light on the intimate nature of the ceremony held at the Chapel Royal in St. James’s Palace.

Prince George, born just three months prior, was baptized in what can only be described as a surprisingly modest affair for a royal of his stature.

With only 22 attendees present, the ceremony was far from the opulent celebrations typically associated with the British monarchy.

The newly appointed Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, officiated the service on October 23, marking a significant moment in the young prince’s life.

Jobson notes that this baptism starkly contrasted with the lavish celebration of Prince William’s own christening in 1982, which attracted much more attention and a larger crowd.

The decision to keep the guest list short resulted in some notable exclusions, including Princess Anne, the Duke of York, and the Earl of Wessex.

This choice allowed the Cambridges to invite close friends and family instead.

Among the 22 guests were Catherine’s parents, Michael and Carole Middleton, along with her siblings, Pippa and James.

Also present were Prince Charles, Camilla, Prince Harry, the Queen, and Prince Philip, creating a tight-knit gathering for this royal milestone.

The selection of godparents for Prince George was equally intriguing, featuring a blend of William and Kate’s early friends and school companions.

Notable figures included Julia Samuel, a close confidante of Princess Diana, and Jamie Lothar Pinkerton, who has been a long-time aide to Prince William.

This mix of personal connections highlights the couple’s desire to keep the occasion intimate and reflective of their close relationships.

Interestingly, among the chosen godparents was Zara Tyndall, Princess Anne’s daughter, which adds a familial touch to the ceremony despite Anne’s absence.

It seems that the Cambridges aimed to balance royal tradition with personal significance in their choices.

Jobson draws an interesting parallel between George’s baptism and that of his father, which took place at Buckingham Palace.

William’s christening was a grand affair, featuring a balcony appearance by the Queen Mother and a throng of spectators outside, showcasing the public’s fascination with the royal family.

A portrait taken during George’s baptism offered a glimpse into this momentous occasion, featuring Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Charles, and baby George.

This image marked a historic moment, as it was the first time since 1899 that the reigning monarch was seen with three heirs apparent, a nod to the continuity of the royal lineage.

In an unexpected twist, renowned actress Candace Bergen has released a series of intimate photographs of Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, that have ignited a firestorm of controversy.

These images, which depict Meghan in a compromising situation with her bodyguard, surfaced during a recent interview Bergen conducted with television personality I.M.

Muaka in New York City.

The photographs have quickly gone viral, capturing the attention of social media and raising eyebrows about the nature of Meghan’s relationship with her personal security detail.

In these images, Meghan and her bodyguard are seen in a close embrace, prompting intense speculation and discussion among royal watchers and the general public alike.

Bergen addressed the uproar during an exclusive conversation with RQA, where she shared insights into how these photographs came to light and what they could mean for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

“It was completely unexpected,” Bergen recalled.

“Mo and I were deep into our discussion about Meghan’s philanthropic endeavors and her new life outside the royal family when suddenly, a crew member rushed in with these photos.

I was just as stunned as everyone else.”

According to Bergen, the images were taken by a member of the production crew without either Meghan or her bodyguard’s consent, marking a serious invasion of privacy.

“I wanted to halt the interview right then and there to protect their anonymity,” she explained.

“However, Mo persuaded me that this story needed to be told.”

RQA, known for his incisive interviews, recognized the gravity of the situation.

“As journalists, we have a duty to report the truth, even when it’s uncomfortable,” he stated.

The leaked photos raise significant questions regarding the personal lives of the Duke and Duchess, as well as the security protocols designed to protect them.

During their discussion, Bergen and RQA explored the implications of these images on Meghan’s public persona and the scrutiny the royal couple continues to endure.

“Meghan has put in so much effort to build her image as a humanitarian and advocate for social justice,” Bergen pointed out.

“These photos threaten to undermine all that hard work and expose her to unwarranted criticism.”

RQA echoed her sentiments, noting the relentless media attention that has followed Meghan and Harry since they stepped back from royal duties.

“They’ve been vocal about their desire for privacy and their distrust of tabloid media,” he remarked.

“This incident starkly highlights the ongoing challenges they face while trying to establish a new life.”

The conversation also touched on potential security concerns stemming from the leaked images.

RQA emphasized that Meghan’s bodyguard is a trained professional tasked with ensuring her safety.

“The fact that these private moments were captured and disseminated raises serious doubts about the effectiveness of their security measures,” he cautioned.

Both Bergen and RQA agree that the release of these photographs signifies a troubling breach of the Duke and Duchess’s right to privacy—an issue that has plagued them since their marriage.

“Meghan and Harry have been very clear about wanting to control the narrative of their lives,” Bergen stated.

“These photos strip away that control, revealing aspects of their private lives they never intended to share.”

RQA acknowledged the fine line between public interest in the royal family and the Sussexes’ right to privacy.

“While there will always be scrutiny regarding their actions, this incident serves as a reminder that even the most public figures deserve a degree of respect and privacy,” he asserted.

As the interview wrapped up, Bergen and RQA contemplated the potential fallout from the leaked images, including possible legal repercussions and the impact on Meghan’s reputation and mental health.

“Meghan has openly discussed the toll that constant media scrutiny has taken on her,” Bergen noted.

“Invasions like this can be incredibly damaging, both emotionally and professionally.”

RQA added that society needs to cultivate more empathy and understanding regarding the lives of public figures.

“We may never fully comprehend the circumstances surrounding these photos,” he said, “but it’s evident that Meghan and her family deserve the same basic rights to privacy and respect that everyone else expects.”

The release of these intimate photographs has undoubtedly ignited a heated debate about privacy and public interest.

As the world watches the Duke and Duchess of Sussex navigate this latest challenge, one thing remains clear: the public’s fascination with royal drama shows no signs of waning.

OMG! Angry Katy Perry BLOCKS Meghan Forever After Meghan CRASH Her Show With Paparazzi & Bodyguards.

In the realm of royal news and analysis, a spotlight has once again been cast upon Meghan and Harry, a couple known for their knack for stirring up controversy.

Today, we delve into the audacious escapade that unfolded at Katy Perry’s concert in Las Vegas, leaving many bewildered by the duo’s shameless display.

Picture this – Meghan and Harry, infamous attention seekers, made a grand entrance at Katy Perry’s final residency show, not as mere spectators but as VIP guests. Check my comment for more

 

Meghan and Harry’s Attention-Seeking Antics at Katy Perry’s Concert

 

In the realm of royal news and analysis, a spotlight has once again been cast upon Meghan and Harry, a couple known for their knack for stirring up controversy.

Today, we delve into the audacious escapade that unfolded at Katy Perry’s concert in Las Vegas, leaving many bewildered by the duo’s shameless display.

Picture this – Meghan and Harry, infamous attention seekers, made a grand entrance at Katy Perry’s final residency show, not as mere spectators but as VIP guests.

Their ostentatious presence was hard to miss, with Meghan donning a flashy gem-encrusted outfit paired with a blazer, while Harry opted for a sleek suit.

Despite their glamorous attire, an air of discontent seemed to envelop them, prompting curiosity about their relentless pursuit of the spotlight.

What ensued at the concert only added to the intrigue.

Katy Perry, unfazed by Meghan and Harry’s antics, appeared indifferent towards the royal couple, as revealed by sources close to her fiancé, Orlando Bloom.

To Katy and Orlando, Meghan and Harry were insignificant figures in a sea of faces, signaling a clear lack of interest in engaging with the attention-seeking pair.

The underlying tension between Meghan and Katy Perry dates back to their time as neighbors in Montecito, where Katy openly criticized Meghan’s fashion choices, particularly her ill-fitting wedding dress.

This simmering rivalry came to the fore once again at the concert, highlighting Meghan’s desperate attempts to overshadow a genuine star like Katy Perry, who effortlessly commands attention through her talent.

Despite Meghan’s calculated efforts to draw the paparazzi’s gaze and surround herself with bodyguards, her ploy backfired, resulting in a cold reception from both the audience and even Katy Perry’s father.

The snub from Katy’s inner circle underscores Meghan’s diminishing relevance and the hollowness of her quest for fame outside the royal spotlight.

The pitiable sight of Meghan and Harry grasping at straws for attention raises questions about their misplaced priorities.

Instead of channeling their energy towards meaningful pursuits, the couple continues to chase after fleeting moments of stardom, oblivious to the diminishing returns of their attention-seeking endeavors.

As Katy Perry’s nonchalant dismissal of Meghan and Harry illustrates, their 15 minutes of fame are rapidly waning, leaving them stranded in a cycle of self-induced irrelevance.

The spectacle at Katy Perry’s concert serves as a poignant reminder of the couple’s misguided fixation on fame, overshadowing any potential for genuine contribution or positive impact.

Celine Dion Releases Documentary Claiming Meghan Markle Was an Escort When She Met Prince Harry. Celine Dion is set to make waves with her upcoming documentary, **”I Am Celine Dion,”** by revealing shocking claims about Meghan Markle’s past.

The iconic songstress, known for her powerful voice and emotive performances, has announced that the film will provide evidence suggesting Meghan Markle was an escort when she met Prince Harry. This revelation has the potential to shake the foundations of the British royal family

 

Celine Dion’s Documentary Unveils Meghan Markle’s Past as a Yacht Girl

afzaal agha June 21, 20240

 

Celine Dion Releases Documentary Claiming Meghan Markle Was an Escort When She Met Prince Harry. Celine Dion is set to make waves with her upcoming documentary, **”I Am Celine Dion,”** by revealing shocking claims about Meghan Markle’s past. The iconic songstress, known for her powerful voice and emotive performances, has announced that the film will provide evidence suggesting Meghan Markle was an escort when she met Prince Harry. This revelation has the potential to shake the foundations of the British royal family and has already captivated the public’s imagination. 

Dion, who has lived a life filled with both triumphs and tribulations, is now stepping into the role of a whistleblower. Her documentary, slated for release this fall, will delve into her personal and professional life but has garnered attention for its explosive segment about Meghan Markle. According to sources close to the production, Dion claims to have irrefutable proof linking Meghan to a high-end escort service that catered to wealthy and influential clients, including Prince Harry.

In one of the documentary’s teasers, Dion is seen holding a folder labeled “Top Secret,” her eyes gleaming with determination as she declares, “The truth must be told. The world deserves to know the real story.” This declaration has set the stage for what could be one of the most explosive royal scandals in recent history.

The British royal family has had its fair share of scandals, but this one could be monumental. Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has been a polarizing figure ever since joining the royal fold. Critics accuse her of being manipulative and fame-hungry, while supporters see her as a modern woman challenging outdated traditions. If Dion’s allegations prove true, the repercussions could be significant, not only tarnishing Meghan’s reputation but also questioning the integrity of the royal family’s vetting processes.

Skeptics are already questioning the legitimacy of Dion’s claims, given the celebrity gossip industry’s history of fabrications and half-truths. However, insiders suggest that Dion’s evidence is meticulously compiled and difficult to dispute. Key pieces of evidence reportedly include a series of emails exchanged between Meghan and a high-profile client and photographs purportedly showing Meghan in compromising situations. Additionally, interviews with former colleagues and acquaintances of Meghan will be featured, including a detailed and compelling testimony from a woman named Sophie, who claims to have worked alongside Meghan in the escort service.

As news of Dion’s documentary spreads, reactions have been mixed. Social media platforms are buzzing with debates and discussions, with hashtags like #MeghanMarkleScandal and #DionDocumentary trending worldwide. Supporters of Meghan Markle accuse Dion of fabricating evidence for publicity, while others eagerly await the documentary’s release, curious to see what revelations it might contain.

One user tweeted, “I think Celine’s just looking for attention. This is just another attempt to bring Meghan down because she broke away from the royal family.” On the flip side, another user posted, “If Celine has the receipts, then we deserve to know the truth. No one is above scrutiny.”

For Meghan and Harry, the implications of Dion’s documentary could be far-reaching. The couple, who have already stepped back from their royal duties and relocated to the United States, now face a new wave of public scrutiny. How they respond to these allegations could have lasting impacts on their reputation and public standing.

As the world waits for the release of **”I Am Celine Dion,”** one thing is certain: the documentary promises to be as dramatic and captivating as one of Celine Dion’s greatest hits. The truth, whatever it may be, is sure to make headlines.

Kate Middleton   and   Meghan Markle   have frequently been compared since the latter joined the royal family. Insiders and royal experts, h…

Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle have frequently been compared since the latter joined the royal family. Insiders and royal experts, however, claim that Middleton is naturally more suited for royal life due to her long preparation and steady rise into the public eye.

 

Her experience, demeanor, and family background all play a role in her seamless transition into her royal duties, especially compared to Markle’s quick immersion into the royal world. 

When Prince William and Middleton announced their engagement in 2010, they had already been together for nearly a decade. Their long courtship allowed Middleton ample time to understand the pressures of being a royal.

 

 

 

Former royal correspondent Jennie Bond noted, “Kate [Middleton] was given ten years to peer into the goldfish bowl of royal life. Because their courtship was so long, she was able to judge that she could hack it — and William could see that too.” In contrast, Markle, who married Prince Harry after a two-year relationship, faced an overwhelming introduction to royal life.

Although Markle has experience with the media as an actress, the royal spotlight was far more intense. Experts claimed that her limited time to adjust to the royal world played a prominent role in the challenges she faced, making her transition far more turbulent than Middleton’s.

 

 

As per The List, Middleton’s approach to royal life has often been characterized by her calm demeanor, patience, and focus on family. While Markle and Harry frequently make headlines with their various ventures, Middleton has often chosen a more understated approach.

Historian Gareth Russell pointed out that, “I don’t think the pressure is mounting on the Prince and Princess of Wales in terms of competing with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex…In terms of global interest in them, and certainly within Britain and even America, the Prince and Princess of Wales are figures generally of much greater interest to most people than the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.”

 

 

 

Russell further added, “The tours that the Sussexes have undertaken recently have certainly gone successfully, but they haven’t garnered the same kind of attention that a royal tour necessarily would. We’re still not seeing, at the minute, a massive uptick in the amount of public interest in the Sussexes compared to, say, the interest in the Princess of Wales. I think there certainly will be interest in new royal tours once the Princess of Wales is well.”

 

Recently, Middleton’s resilience has been tested in a new way. After battling cancer​, the Princess of Wales announced that she is now cancer-free, and her statement touched many hearts. 

As per OK Magazine, reflecting on her journey, Middleton remarked, “The cancer journey is complex, scary, and unpredictable for everyone, especially those closest to you. With humility, it also brings you face to face with your own vulnerabilities in a way you have never considered before, and with that, a new perspective on everything.”

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle put late Queen in an ‘impossible position’ as she ‘couldn’t condone’ cruel act

Prince Harry’s “cruel act” greatly upset the late Queen and left her in an “impossible position”, according to a lea…

Prince Harry’s “cruel act” greatly upset the late Queen and left her in an “impossible position”, according to a leading royal biographer.

The grandma and grandson had always had a close bond, but the late monarch felt her hand had been forced as she couldn’t condone his behavior. Renowned royal author Ingrid Seward detailed the prince’s fall from Her Majesty’s grace and his public fall-out with his family in her book, My Mother and I.

 

“He had discovered a way of making himself the centre of attention and that was by dissing his family, about whom he felt increasingly bitter,” Ingrid wrote. She said that the issues with his brother were almost expected, but “the anger aimed at the British monarchy, his father and step-mother, was totally unnecessary”. 

“His anger eventually destroyed his credibility in other areas of his life, and his grandmother, the late Queen, found herself in an impossible position. However much she loved Harry – and she did – she couldn’t condone the way he was speaking about the institution of the monarchy that she had spent 70 years preserving,” she added.

The author revealed how the Queen’s cousin and close confidante, Lady Elizabeth Anson, confirmed that the monarch had been “upset” by her grandson’s attitude.

Lady Anson also dished out details on how the Queen felt about the romance between Harry and Meghan, saying that she felt they were “too in love”. She also said that the young prince was “under his future wife’s spell”.

Prince Philip had his own reservations about Meghan, giving her a coded nickname – “DoW” – because she reminded him of Wallis Simpson, the Duchess of Windsor, the divorced American socialite whose plans to marry King Edward VIII caused a constitutional crisis that almost led to his abdication.

 

Harry met the American actress in 2016, with the pair getting engaged a year later in 2017. Their televised royal wedding took place on May 19, 2018. Just like the DoW, Meghan had been married before. 

In the book, Ingrid writes that it was Meghan’s nationality as an American, and her status as a divorcee, that lead him to liken her to Edward’s wife. Edward VIII was the uncle of the late Queen who abdicated in 1936. Next in line to the throne was the Queen’s father, George VI, making the young Elizabeth next in line.

In a bombshell revelation, filmmaker Andrew McCarthy has sparked significant controversy with his new documentary Bratz, which includes explosive claims about Meghan Markle’s pregnancy with her first child, Archie.

According to McCarthy, newly uncovered evidence raises serious doubts about whether Meghan carried Archie herself.

The documentary, which dives into the lives of several high-profile figures, has ignited a firestorm of debate.

 

One of the most shocking segments of Bratz focuses on Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, and suggests that inconsistencies in her public appearances during her pregnancy may point to the use of a surrogate. McCarthy highlights supposed discrepancies in the size and shape of Meghan’s baby bump, arguing that these details cast doubt on her pregnancy.

The film also features testimony from anonymous sources close to the royal family and confidential interviews with medical experts, although it stops short of directly revealing Meghan’s medical records.

The documentary has sent shockwaves across social media, with users on platforms like Twitter and Reddit engaging in heated discussions.

Some viewers, who have long harbored doubts about Meghan’s pregnancy, view the documentary as confirmation of their suspicions. However, critics argue that the film is speculative and lacks concrete evidence.

 

As of now, neither Meghan Markle nor Prince Harry has publicly responded to the claims, though sources close to the couple suggest they may pursue legal action against McCarthy for defamation and invasion of privacy.

Meghan and Harry have previously defended their privacy through legal battles with media outlets, and this situation could escalate into another high-profile case.

This latest controversy adds to the challenges the couple has faced since stepping back from royal duties in 2020, following their widely publicized interview with Oprah Winfrey. If McCarthy’s claims gain traction, it could raise significant questions about transparency, privacy, and the royal family’s handling of personal information.