Author: quyen

  • Unveiling Secrets: What You NEVER Knew About Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip’s relationship

    Unveiling Secrets: What You NEVER Knew About Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip’s relationship

    Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip’s relationship was one of the most iconic royal unions in history. While their love story has been well-documented over the years, there are still fascinating secrets and lesser-known details that reveal the depth and complexity of their partnership. As we unveil the hidden aspects of their relationship, we gain insight into how they navigated the challenges of royal life while maintaining their bond.

     

     

    A Love Story That Defied Convention

    Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip’s romance began in the early 1930s when the young princess first met the dashing Greek prince at the wedding of Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark and Prince George, Duke of Kent. Despite the challenges posed by their different backgrounds—Philip being a prince without a kingdom and Elizabeth being the future queen—they fell in love, demonstrating a connection that would endure decades of public scrutiny.

    One lesser-known fact is that Philip proposed to Elizabeth with a ring made from diamonds that belonged to his mother, Princess Alice of Battenberg. This personal touch not only symbolized his affection but also represented a blend of their family legacies. Their engagement was initially kept secret for a time due to the ongoing war and concerns about public opinion, but once it was announced in 1947, it captured the hearts of the nation.

    A Partnership Built on Shared Values

    Throughout their marriage, Elizabeth and Philip often showcased a deep respect for one another. Their shared values and commitment to duty became the foundation of their relationship. Philip, known for his no-nonsense approach and sense of humor, often lightened the mood during formal engagements, helping to ease the pressures of royal life for Elizabeth.

    In public, they presented a united front, but behind closed doors, they maintained a candid relationship where humor and honesty reigned. For instance, Philip famously referred to Elizabeth as “cabbage” as a term of endearment, a playful nod to their bond that illustrated the familiarity they shared. Such playful interactions are often overlooked but highlight the warmth that characterized their marriage.

    Navigating Challenges Together

    Their journey was not without its challenges. Elizabeth ascended to the throne at just 25 years old, and her new role often placed a strain on their relationship. Philip had to adapt to being the consort of the reigning monarch, a position that required him to step back from his own ambitions and career aspirations.

    One secret revealed in royal biographies is that Philip struggled with the constraints of royal protocol and the demands placed upon him. He often felt like he was living in Elizabeth’s shadow. However, rather than allowing these challenges to divide them, they worked through their differences, supporting each other during moments of tension. Their commitment to their family and duty helped to strengthen their bond, making them resilient partners in the face of adversity.

  • Prince Harry’s SHOCKING Split from Meghan Markle Sends FANS into a Frenzy

    Prince Harry’s SHOCKING Split from Meghan Markle Sends FANS into a Frenzy

    Prince Harry’s SHOCKING Split from Meghan Markle Sends FANS into a Frenzy

    Prince Harry’s relationship with Duchess Meghan Markle, sending royal watchers and fans into a frenzy. Speculation about a potential split between the couple has flooded social media, igniting discussions and concerns among their supporters. While the couple has been known for their close-knit bond and commitment to one another, recent developments have raised eyebrows and left many wondering what the future holds for the Sussexes.

     

     

    The Rumors Begin: Unofficial Sources and Speculation

    The swirling rumors reportedly began after a series of events that included Prince Harry attending a high-profile charity gala alone, where he was seen mingling with guests without Meghan by his side. Sources close to the couple have cited various reasons for the alleged rift, including the pressures of royal life, public scrutiny, and their ongoing efforts to carve out a new identity for themselves away from the monarchy.

    The situation escalated further when tabloid reports suggested that the couple had been living separately in recent weeks, with Harry spending more time in the United States while Meghan remained in their home in Montecito, California. Fans quickly took to social media platforms, sharing their shock and disbelief at the thought of the couple, who had been seen as a modern fairy tale, facing such difficulties.

    Fan Reactions: Outrage and Support

    As news of the rumored split spread, fans expressed a mix of emotions ranging from outrage to sadness. Social media was flooded with hashtags like #HarryAndMeghanForever and #SupportTheSussexes, as supporters rallied around the couple, emphasizing their love and commitment to each other.

    One user tweeted, “I refuse to believe Harry and Meghan are splitting up! They’ve overcome so much together. This is just tabloid nonsense.” Others expressed their fears about what a split could mean for their family and charitable endeavors, with comments like, “If they split, it will break my heart. They’re a power couple!”

    Addressing the Rumors: A Call for Understanding

    In light of the rumors, a spokesperson for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has yet to comment publicly on the situation, leading many to speculate about the authenticity of the reports. Supporters of the couple have called for understanding and compassion, urging people not to jump to conclusions based on sensationalized headlines.

    Royal commentators have weighed in on the situation, emphasizing that while there may be challenges in any relationship, especially one under the intense scrutiny of the media, it’s essential to allow the couple the space to navigate their personal matters privately.

  • DNA BOMBSHELL: Man Claims to Be King Charles and Camilla’s SON!”

    DNA BOMBSHELL: Man Claims to Be King Charles and Camilla’s SON!”

    King Charles III and Queen Camilla. This unexpected revelation has raised eyebrows, ignited speculation, and led to questions about the implications for the monarchy.

     

     

    The Claim: A Bold Assertion

    The man, who has chosen to remain anonymous for now, asserts that he was born as a result of an affair between Charles and Camilla prior to their marriage. He has reportedly taken a DNA test to substantiate his claims, which he believes will prove his lineage and challenge the established narrative surrounding the royal couple’s relationship.

    In an exclusive interview, he stated, “I always felt different, as if I didn’t quite belong. When I learned about my family history, I knew I had to come forward. The truth needs to be revealed.” His bold assertion has already garnered attention, stirring curiosity about the legitimacy of his claims and the potential ramifications for the royal family.

    The Royal Family’s Response: Shock and Denial

    As news of the claim spreads, the royal family is reportedly in a state of shock. Sources close to the family have indicated that they are taking the matter seriously but are also skeptical of the man’s assertions. Insiders have noted that there have been no credible allegations or evidence to support his claim until now, and the royal family is urging caution before jumping to conclusions.

    Royal experts emphasize that such claims are not unprecedented; throughout history, various individuals have claimed connections to the royal family. However, they often lack substantial evidence to support their assertions. The ongoing scrutiny from the media and the public is expected to be intense as the situation unfolds.

    The Implications: A Challenge to Royal Legacy

    If proven true, the man’s claims could have significant implications for the monarchy. Questions regarding succession, legitimacy, and the integrity of the royal lineage could arise, potentially altering the dynamics of the royal family.

    Legal experts suggest that the implications could extend beyond the royal family itself. If he is indeed found to be the biological son of King Charles and Camilla, it could lead to a legal battle over recognition and inheritance rights. Such a scenario would further complicate the already delicate relationship between the monarchy and the public.

  • Behind closed doors: King Charles’s speech to Prince Harry presented by Angela Levin shocks fans

    Behind closed doors: King Charles’s speech to Prince Harry presented by Angela Levin shocks fans

     
    Behind Closed Doors: King Charles’ Speech to Prince Harry Exposed by Angela Levin
    This time, we’re flashing back to October 2023 when King Charles was out doing his royal duties, participating in a historic ceremony dating all the way back to 1689. He’s carrying this pearl sword, a gift from none other than Queen Elizabeth I herself, symbolizing authority and responsibility. Sounds like a typical royal affair, right? Well, not quite. Hold on to your crowns because according to royal expert Angela Levin, this wasn’t just any royal speech. This was King Charles playing 4D chess and sending a not-so-subtle message to his estranged son, our favorite royal rebel, Prince Harry. 

    Let’s break down what Charles said. There he was, decked out in his royal regalia, with that signature squinty-eyed look, and he drops this line: “Do we pause instinctively and unerringly before speaking or acting to ensure we are affording equal weight to both sides of the balance? Our society would be a kinder and gentler place for it.”

    Whoa, Your Majesty, are you about to start a royal rap battle? Because those are some serious words. But here’s where it gets juicy. Angela Levin, the Sherlock Holmes of royal watchers, decoded the speech like it was *The Da Vinci Code*. According to her, this wasn’t just a generic call for kindness. Oh no, this was Charles serving up a piping hot plate of shade, with a side of “Sit down and be quiet, son.”

    Let’s dissect it. When Charles talks about pausing before speaking or acting, he might as well be holding up a neon sign that says, “Harry, for the love of everything royal, please think before you speak!” Can you blame the guy? His son has been out there spilling more tea than the Boston Tea Party, and Charles is probably thinking, “I didn’t sign up for this when I became king. Where’s the reset button on this parenting thing?”

    And then there’s the line about affording equal weight to both sides of the balance. Even if you’re not a royal expert, it’s pretty clear what Charles is hinting at. It’s like he’s saying, “Harry, I know you think the world revolves around you and Meghan, but there are two sides to every story.” It’s the royal equivalent of saying, “There are three sides to every story: yours, mine, and the truth.”

    But here’s where it gets really interesting. Angela Levin, bless her, says this is Charles basically telling Harry, “Don’t come in here demanding apologies years later.” And I’ve got to say, I am *living* for this royal drama. It’s like *The Crown* meets *Jerry Springer*, and I am here for it.

    Now, let’s pause to appreciate the masterclass in passive-aggressiveness that Charles is serving. This man has been waiting longer to do his job than most of us have been alive, and he’s dropping bombs in the most polite, most British way possible. It’s like he’s saying, “I’m not angry; I’m just disappointed,” but with a royal twist.

    The kicker? Angela Levin doesn’t think Harry’s going to notice at all. And honestly, she’s probably right. Harry, bless his ginger heart, has been so wrapped up in his own narrative that he probably wouldn’t recognize an olive branch if it smacked him in the face. And don’t even get me started on Meghan. She’s probably in their Montecito mansion, practicing her “I’m listening intently” face in the mirror while internally planning their next move. This whole “Harry and Meghan vs. the world” saga has her fingerprints all over it.

    Now, I know what some of you might be thinking. “Friendly neighborhood critic, aren’t you being a bit harsh on Harry and Meghan?” And I hear you, but let’s break this down. Here we have two incredibly privileged individuals who had the world at their feet. They were beloved members of one of the most famous families in the world. They had wealth, status, and the ability to make real, meaningful change. And what did they do? They threw a royal tantrum, packed up their toys, and moved to California to become… professional victims?

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure life in the royal family isn’t all tea and trumpets. I’m sure the pressures and expectations would crack most of us faster than you can say, “God Save the King.” But the way Harry and Meghan have aired their grievances—it’s like watching a car crash in slow motion. Only the car is made of solid gold, and the driver insists they’re the victim.

    And what about this vacation to some exclusive island? They’re out here complaining about being cut off financially, and then they’re jetting off to places most of us couldn’t even point to on a map. It’s like they’re living in an alternate reality where actions don’t have consequences, and cognitive dissonance is a fashion statement.

    The hypocrisy. They preach environmentalism while taking private jets. They demand privacy while doing tell-all interviews and Netflix specials. They complain about royal life while clinging to their titles. It’s enough to make your head spin.

    Meanwhile, poor King Charles. He finally gets the throne after waiting longer than some small countries have existed, and instead of basking in the glory, he’s stuck playing royal referee. It’s like he’s trapped in a bizarre game of keep-away with the crown, only the other player is his own son.

    But credit where it’s due—Charles’s approach here is masterful. He’s not stooping to Harry’s level by airing dirty laundry in public. He’s not giving explosive interviews or writing tell-all memoirs. He’s using the very institution Harry’s rebelling against to send his message. It’s like he’s saying, “You want to play this game, son? Two can play that game.”

    The irony is rich. Harry claims he left the royal family to protect his own family and break the cycle of “genetic pain” or whatever New Age philosophy he’s quoting these days. Meanwhile, Charles is using centuries-old traditions to try and knock some sense into him. It’s like watching a chess match, except one of the players flipped the board and declared themselves the winner.

    But here’s the real tragedy. The collateral damage. Think about little Archie and Lilibet, growing up in the middle of all this drama. Think about William and Kate, trying to carry on with their duties while their family is being torn apart. Think about Queen Elizabeth, spending her final years watching her family implode. For what? So Harry and Meghan can play the victim card and rake in millions?

    It’s exhausting. It’s unnecessary. And frankly, it’s getting old.

    But let’s circle back to King Charles and his pearl sword speech. This moment perfectly encapsulates the royal family’s current situation. Tradition vs. modernity. Carefully chosen words with hidden messages. A father trying to reach out to his son the only way he knows how. And what does Harry do? According to Angela Levin, he ignores it completely.

    Charles isn’t just Harry’s dad, though—he’s the King of England. Sooner or later, Harry’s going to have to realize that his actions have consequences, not just for him and his family, but for the entire institution he’s still a part of. Strip away the royal titles, and who is Harry? A middle-aged man with a Netflix deal and a tendency to overshare.

    Harry and Meghan want all the perks of royalty without the responsibilities. They want the spotlight without the scrutiny. They want to be both victims and heroes. But that’s just not how the world works.

  • Prince Harry’s model ex-girlfriend makes shocking revelations about her past relationship

    Prince Harry’s model ex-girlfriend makes shocking revelations about her past relationship

    A former girlfriend of Prince Harry has admitted she feels “lucky” that the split up and that their relationship did not last beca…


    A former girlfriend of Prince Harry has admitted she feels “lucky” that the split up and that their relationship did not last because of the lifestyle it brought.

    Florence St George, a former model who dated Prince Harry in 2011, said she struggled with the media attention their relationship received.

    She also said that she “takes [her] hat off to people who can cope with that lifestyle”, potentially referring to the Duke of Sussex’s wife Meghan Markle, who he married in 2018.

    “My privacy ended abruptly, and the scrutiny began,” she told Stella magazine.

    “A new story would appear almost every day in the press, my school friends were interrogated and there were photographers outside my front door.

    “I take my hat off to those people who can cope with that lifestyle, but I knew I couldn’t. Although it was sad at the time, I feel lucky that the relationship was short lived.”

    Mrs St George ultimately married Henry St George, the vice-president of the Grand Bahama Port Authority, in 2014 and the couple now have two children, Iris and Jimmy.

    Another of Prince Harry’s high profile relationships was with Zimbabwean lawyer Chelsy Davy, whom the Duke had known since his school days.

    However, she also ended their romance after realising she wasn’t cut out for royal life, with the realisation reportedly coming after she watched the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge tie the knot in 2011.

    Royal biographer Robert Lacey explains in his book Battle of Brothers that shortly after the wedding, where Harry had been his brother’s best man, Chelsey finally ended their long romance.

    He writes: “In 2011, after more comings and goings, she finally decided to go – and it was, ironically, Kate and William’s grand and glorious wedding that spring that did it for her.

    “According to a friend, she told Harry that she could never make the sacrifices she had witnessed Kate making, particularly when it came to moulding her life around the unremitting attention of the press.”

    It wasn’t just Chelsy who decided against royal life – his next girlfriend Cressida Bonas did too.

    The Burberry model met Harry in 2012 and the pair dated on and off until 2014.

    MrLacey added: “A rising actress, Cressida did not enjoy the critical remarks that she could hear people making behind her back when she walked down the street in London – she felt that the fame of her relationship put her ‘in a box’.”

  • The reason Queen Elizabeth II’s hands now look purple has been revealed

    The reason Queen Elizabeth II’s hands now look purple has been revealed

    Queen Elizabeth delighted royal fans today as she stood smiling and unaided in her first meeting since spraining her back. Bu…


    Queen Elizabeth delighted royal fans today as she stood smiling and unaided in her first meeting since spraining her back.

    But a picture showing her hands to be a shade of purple has sparked conversation about the 95-year-old monarch’s heath – and whether the courtiers need to turn the heating on at Windsor Castle.

    Her Majesty, who has been on doctors’ orders to rest for over a month, held a face-to-face audience on Wednesday with General Sir Nick Carter, the Chief of the Defence Staff.

    In pictures released by Buckingham Palace, both the Queen and General Sir Carter’s hands look dark purple.

    While it could just be the lighting in the room causing the effect, purple skin can be a sign of poor circulation

    This can happen in cold weather, which causes your blood vessels and arteries to narrow, restricting blood flow and reducing oxygen to the heart.

    Dr Jay Verma, from the Shakespeare Medical Centre, told Metro.co.uk: ‘It might be Raynaud’s phenomenon or just really cold hands! The purple is due to deoxygenated blood.’

     According to the Raynaud’s phenomenon is common and does not usually cause severe problems. It can be treated by keeping warm and will usually go away after a few minutes or hours.

    The Queen has previously been pictured with a purplish blemish on her hands, when royals from Jordan came to visit back in 2019.

    According to Dr Giuseppe Aragona, GP and Online Doctor for Prescription Doctor, there are several medical explanations for why the darker hue has returned.

    A purple hue was seen on the Queen’s hands back in 2019, when royals from Jordan came to visit

    He said: ‘There are a few different reasons for why the Queens hands are so purple: a lack of circulation,  frail skin, exposed veins, bruising, a leakage of blood to the tissue beneath the skin causing the colour.

    ‘It could be Cyanosis which occurs when there is not enough oxygen in the blood.

    ‘Blood which has a normal amount of oxygen is a deep red and means your skin is its normal colour, however low oxygenated blood is bluer which causes your skin to have a purple hue.

    ‘It is known that Cyanosis can develop quicker if the person has suffered a minor health problem, so this could be linked to her recent injury.’

    Buckingham Palace confirmed in a last-minute announcement on Sunday that the Queen had sprained her back and would not be able to attend the Remembrance service at the Cenotaph.

    The event, to pay tribute to the war dead, has long been one of the most important in the monarch’s calendar, and was widely expected to be her first public appearance after cancelling other engagements due to doctors’ advice.

    Prince Charles, the future King, was teary-eyed during the service in central London as he laid a poppy wreath on behalf of his mother.

    The Queen’s latest injury has sparked concerns over the impact of car journeys and longer periods of standing.

    It followed another health scare last month, which saw the Queen staying in hospital overnight for the first time in eight years, forcing the cancellation of two trips.

    Buckingham Palace said she had cancelled her plan to attend ‘with great regret’.

    Today, Prince Charles insisted ‘the Queen is alright’ but said ‘it’s not as easy when you get to 95’.

    Concern was briefly raised for his own health back in 2019, when he was pictured with swollen hands and feet during a tour of India.

    Experts at the time said it could be caused by anything from water retention to poor circulation or even arthritis.

     During a tour of Jordan today, Charles was asked by a journalist to send on their best wishes to the Queen after her recent bout of ill health.

    The prince replied: ‘She’s alright, thank you very much.

    ‘Once you get to 95, it’s not quite as easy as it used to be. It’s bad enough at 73.’

    Despite joking about his own age, Charles is among seven senior royals posed to step in and help the Queen as aides scale down her diary.

    Prince Charles, his wife Camilla, Prince William and Kate, Princess Anne and Prince Edward and his wife Sophie are all understood to be aligned on helping out ‘for as long as is needed’.

    The family members have been dubbed the ‘Magnificent 7’ by courtiers, who hope the ‘joint approach’ will give Her Majesty more time to recover before her Platinum Jubilee next year.

  • Meghan Markle texted her aide to say Prince Harry faced ‘constant berating’ from royal family because of strained relationship with her father (Photos & Text messages)

    Meghan Markle texted her aide to say Prince Harry faced ‘constant berating’ from royal family because of strained relationship with her father (Photos & Text messages)

    Meghan Markle texted her aide to say Prince Harry faced ‘constant berating’ from royal family because of strained relationship with her father (Photos & Text messages)

    The Duchess of Sussex texted a former aide that Harry faced ‘constant berating’ from the royal family over her strained relationship…


    The Duchess of Sussex texted a former aide that Harry faced ‘constant berating’ from the royal family over her strained relationship with her estranged father Thomas, messages released today – which he saved under the name ‘Tilly’ – have shown.

    Meghan, 40, sued Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of The Mail On Sunday and MailOnline, over five articles that reproduced parts of a ‘personal and private’ letter to Mr Markle, 77.

    ANL has brought an appeal against a High Court judge’s decision to grant Meghan summary judgment – meaning she won her case without a trial.

    During the hearing this week, ANL’s lawyers told senior judges they want to rely on new evidence from Jason Knauf – former communications secretary to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex – who claimed that the duchess wrote the letter with the understanding that it could be leaked.

    One exchange from August 2018 showed Meghan discussing her drafting of the letter with Mr Knauf.

    She told him: ‘Everything I have drafted is with the understanding it could be leaked, so I have been meticulous in my word choice. But please do let me know if anything stands out for you as a liability’.

    She then told him: ‘Given I have only ever called him daddy, it may it make sense to open as such despite him being less than paternal. And in the unfortunate event it leaked it would pull at the heart strings. The rest is in the spirit of facts rather than seeming orchestrated or litigious. Simply an appeal for peace and a reminder of what is actually happened’.

    In a fourth text she said: ‘Trust me – toiled over every detail’, to which Mr Knauf replied: ‘Leave nothing to chance, that’s the only way through this’.

    And as the letter was completed she texted: ‘Honestly Jason, I feel fantastic, cathartic and real and honest and factual and if he leaks it then that’s on his conscience and then at least the world will know the truth. Words I could never voice, publicly’.

    After extracts of texts and emails between the duchess and Mr Knauf were used in court, further texts were made public on Friday following an application by the PA news agency and The Times.

    Meghan previously told the Court of Appeal that the main purpose of the letter ‘was to encourage my father to stop talking to the press’ after public criticism and a ‘media onslaught’ surrounding Mr Markle.

    ‘It was only when my father began criticizing the royal family…that senior members of the family and their advisers expressed their concern over the public attacks, and expressed their desire to have them stopped,’ she wrote in her evidence.

    In the newly released text messages, sent to Mr Knauf while she was drafting the handwritten letter, the duchess can be seen expressing her frustration about the response of the royal family.

    She wrote: ‘The catalyst for my doing this is seeing how much pain this is causing H.

    ‘Even after a week with his dad and endlessly explaining the situation, his family seem to forget the context – and revert to ‘can’t she just go and see him and make this stop?’

    ‘They fundamentally don’t understand so at least by writing H will be able to say to his family ‘she wrote him a letter and he’s still doing it’.








    ‘By taking this form of action I protect my husband from this constant berating and while unlikely perhaps it will give my father a moment to pause.’

    During Harry and Meghan’s interview with Oprah Winfrey earlier this year, the couple laid bare their troubled relationship with the monarchy and the duke revealed he ‘felt led down’ by the Prince of Wales.

    He said his father stopped taking his calls as he attempted to map out his future role in the monarchy in late 2019, when the duchess was under intense pressure.

    Harry told Winfrey: ‘But at the same time – I will always love him – but there’s a lot of hurt that’s happened and I will continue to make it one of my priorities to try and heal that relationship.’

    During the Court of Appeal hearing, ANL’s lawyers argued that an article in People magazine in the US, which featured an interview with five friends of Meghan, misrepresented the letter and made ‘nasty’ allegations about Mr Markle.

    Andrew Caldecott QC, representing ANL, said that the article falsely presented Mr Markle as giving ‘a cynical and self-interested response ignoring her pleas for reconciliation in a loving letter’.

    In the newly released texts, Meghan told Mr Knauf the letter ‘does not open the door for a conversation’.

    The Court of Appeal also heard that Mr Knauf – acting on Meghan’s instructions – provided information to the authors of Finding Freedom by Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand – leading to Meghan apologising for misleading the court.

    In his witness statement, Mr Knauf said the book was ‘discussed on a routine basis’, which was ‘discussed directly with the duchess multiple times in person and over email’.

    Emails published today show Meghan and Harry discussing the book with advisers.

    In her evidence, made public on Wednesday, Meghan said: ‘When I approved the passage…I did not have the benefit of seeing these emails and I apologise to the court for the fact that I had not remembered these exchanges at the time.

    ‘I had absolutely no wish or intention to mislead the defendant or the court.’

    The new texts and emails show that in an email to Meghan in December 2018, Mr Knauf said he had spent ‘close to two hours’ with the authors of the unauthorised biography.

    ‘I took them through everything,’ he wrote.

    ‘They are going to time the book for run up to the baby being born and it is going to be very positive.’

    Mr Knauf also told the duchess that the book would be a ‘celebration of you that corrects the record on a number of fronts’ according to the authors.

    At the end of the hearing on Thursday, the three senior judges said they will take time to consider their decision and give their ruling on ANL’s appeal at a later date.

  • Thomas Markle Jr publicly apologizes to Meghan Markle after years of bad-mouthing her in the press (Video)

    Thomas Markle Jr publicly apologizes to Meghan Markle after years of bad-mouthing her in the press (Video)

    Thomas Markle Jr has issued a public apology to his sister Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, after criticising her in the media for years. The 55-y…

     

     

    Thomas Markle Jr has issued a public apology to his sister Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, after criticising her in the media for years.

    The 55-year-old said he had made some horrible mistakes’ after being thrust into the spotlight when Meghan started dating Prince Harry.

    BONUS: CLICK HERE TO JOIN NEW & TRENDING SOCIAL MEDIA “WAWWOO”, Socialize, Make friends, Find Love, Explore, Discover, Much More ALL FOR FREE 

    Markle Jr who is a contestant in Australian reality show Big Brother VIP, also said he hoped his step sister was watching him on the show saying: ‘That’s why I’m doing this, so she can see the real me.’

    ‘I want everybody watching to take away this side of me, the real me. I am lovable, nice, I’ll give you the shirt off my back, I’m funny,’ he said to New Idea.

     

    Thomas Markle Jr publicly apologizes to Meghan Markle after years of bad-mouthing her in the press

    Despite having previously warned Prince Harry his sister would ‘ruin your life’, Thomas said there was no animosity on his side.

    He said that growing up with Meghan had been ‘a great experience’ and that they were ‘very close’ and would spend ‘lots of quality time’ together.

    BONUS: CLICK HERE TO JOIN NEW & TRENDING SOCIAL MEDIA “WAWWOO”, Socialize, Make friends, Find Love, Explore, Discover, Much More ALL FOR FREE 

    Thomas said their relationship soured when Meghan started dating Harry and he was ‘thrown to the wolves’ with ‘no experience’ of handling the press.

    ‘I was being backed into a corner, into a wall. I made some horrible mistakes and still regret them to this day,’ he said.

    Thomas insisted he loves his sister and would ‘do anything’ to meet his nephew Archie, two, and niece Lilibet, four months.

    ‘I don’t need a photo-op to go see my sister, and I don’t want a story behind it,’ he explained.

    ‘I don’t want anything, I would just love to go over to their home and knock on the door, give her a big hug and kiss, and say I missed the hell out of her and apologise right to her face…

    ‘Maybe one day that will happen. I’d do anything to see Archie and Lilibet.’

    In a candid conversation with his housemates during Monday’s season premiere of Big Brother VIP, Thomas claimed Meghan changed after finding fame.

    BONUS: CLICK HERE TO JOIN NEW & TRENDING SOCIAL MEDIA “WAWWOO”, Socialize, Make friends, Find Love, Explore, Discover, Much More ALL FOR FREE 

    ‘What happened to her, nobody can figure it out. Money changed her I guess. Money and fame just went to her head really bad,’ he said.

    Thomas went on to say that Meghan ‘walked all over’ her first husband, film producer Trevor Engelson, who had ‘adored’ her.

  • Prince Harry Puts a Stop to Meghan Markle’s £100M Revenge Plan: Every Draft Rejected!

    Prince Harry Puts a Stop to Meghan Markle’s £100M Revenge Plan: Every Draft Rejected!

    Since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped away from royal life in 2020, it’s been a whirlwind for the Sussexes—filled with drama, feuds, …


    Since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stepped away from royal life in 2020, it’s been a whirlwind for the Sussexes—filled with drama, feuds, and, of course, the infamous “Megxit.”

    Now, it seems Meghan is plotting her ultimate revenge with an explosive tell-all memoir. But let’s be real: with publishers reportedly turning her down, this whole memoir saga is starting to feel like a desperate attempt to stay relevant.

     

    According to insiders who spoke to *Closer* magazine, Meghan is allegedly trying to land a lucrative book deal, with figures being thrown around that would make even the wealthiest royals raise an eyebrow. 

    Apparently, the buzz in publishing circles is that everyone is eager to get their hands on Meghan’s memoir, with deals potentially soaring into the tens of millions. We’re talking about a staggering £100 million deal if she plays her cards right, which might even include a bombshell biopic.

    However, the big question remains: what exactly does she have to share?

    Let’s pause and consider how Meghan has recently been branded “The Duchess Difficult,” thanks to allegations of less-than-stellar treatment of staff.

    Insiders claim she belittles her employees and marches around like a dictator in high heels. So, is this really the woman who’s about to dish the dirt on the royal family? It’s hard to imagine anyone taking a memoir seriously when she can’t seem to keep her own house in order.

    The claim that Meghan has had an “extraordinary journey” feels a bit rich. Sure, she’s had her share of experiences, but she already has a tendency to spin narratives that might not hold up under scrutiny.

    After all, she’s been out of the royal game for a while and hasn’t exactly been privy to any deep royal secrets. If she’s expecting a payday based on her time as a royal, she might be setting herself up for disappointment.

    The public will remember that after leaving the palace, Meghan opened up about her mental health struggles during her pregnancy with Archie. She also claimed that the royal family didn’t support her—a surprising statement, given that they’ve thrown her a lifeline several times since her departure.

    Meanwhile, speculation has grown that Harry misses his old life, and their strained relationships with William and Kate have become more apparent than ever. So, is now really the best time for Meghan to drop a memoir?

    Some insiders insist that Meghan is biding her time for the right moment to spill the beans, claiming she has a remarkable story to tell.

    But how many remarkable stories can one person share? Will she pull a “dear diary” and regale us with tales of her struggles as a mixed-race woman in Hollywood, her fairy-tale wedding, and her experiences in the royal spotlight?

    For someone who has “endured so much” (or so she claims), her approach to storytelling seems to be aiming for sensationalism over substance. As for the alleged book deal, one can’t help but chuckle at the thought of Meghan trying to sell her story.

     

    If her past behavior has taught us anything, it’s that she tends to jump ship the moment the tide turns. Who wants to bet that the memoir will be just another attempt to regain lost status? 

    There’s also the notion that this book could wreck Harry’s attempts at mending fences with the royals—and isn’t that a delightful thought?

    Whether Meghan manages to secure a hefty book deal remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the tell-all narrative is feeling a little tired. With Harry’s *Spare* already out there, the public is still left questioning what’s real and what’s manufactured.

    If Meghan thinks she can swoop in and create an uproar with a half-baked memoir, she might want to reconsider.

  • Stacey Solomon has sparked speculation that she’s quit Loose Women

    Stacey Solomon has sparked speculation that she’s quit Loose Women

    Stacey Solomon sparks speculation she’s quit Loose Women for good as she’s not included in anniversary picture

    STACEY Solomon has sparked speculation that she’s quit Loose Women for good after not being included in an anniversary picture.

    Stacey, 34, was a regular panellist but she stepped back from the ITV daytime show as she prepared to give birth to her daughter Belle.

    Stacey Solomon has sparked speculation that she’s quit Loose Women
    3

    Stacey Solomon has sparked speculation that she’s quit Loose WomenCredit: Rex

    Stacey was nowhere to be seen in the anniversary snap
    3

    Stacey was nowhere to be seen in the anniversary snap
    She’s since made a fleeting return to Loose Women for a couple of appearances but has otherwise been AWOL.

    Now, Loose Women have marked their 25th anniversary with a portrait showing 18 of the show’s panellists for the first time.

    The beautiful photo sees the panellists dazzling in an array of silver outfits, while rocking glam hair and makeup looks against a silver backdrop.

    The caption reads: “This September, Loose Women celebrates 25 years on TV!

    “To mark the occasion, 18 panellists got together for a stunning Silver Jubilee photoshoot, and to share what the show means to them. Here the final image can be seen for the first time.”

    But Stacey is nowhere to be seen, which is something fans of the show immediately picked up on.

    “Where’s Stacey,” wrote one person, while another added: “Where’s Stacey gone?!”

    A third said: “Bit awkward when you miss so many others off though,” and someone else wrote: “This would have been better with Stacey,” followed by a crying emoji.

    In the group photo, Christine Lampard, Judi Love, Katie Piper, Kelle Bryan, Frankie Bridge, Dame Kelly Holmes, Charlene White, Sunetra Sarker and Olivia Attwood-Dack can all be seen in shot.

    As well as four of the original panellists, Jane Moore, Kaye Adams, Nadia Sawalha and Ruth Langsford.

    And regular panellists Denise Welch, Linda Robson, Coleen Nolan, Janet Street-Porter and Brenda Edwards in the photo.

    Stars of Loose Women dazzle in a behind the scenes view
     

     

    Earlier this year, it was revealed by Stacey’s Loose Women co-star Linda Robson that she was ‘too busy’ to return to the panel.

    Speaking exclusively to The Sun, Birds Of A Feather legend Linda said: “She’s not going to be a regular anymore? I don’t think so, but you never know.

    “I would love her to come back, she’s a really good Loose Woman – she’s really honest. But I think she’s got too much on.


    “She’s got her own series and her and Joe are out in their little house. She’s still really welcome but she’s just so busy.”

    Stacey first joined the Loose Women panel in 2016 and she quickly became a firm favourite among fans.

    But in December 2022, she decided to bow out and take a break.

    Stacey and her husband Joe Swash’s youngest child, Belle, arrived two months later and her diary was already brimming with other work commitments.

    In the first year of Belle’s life, Stacey found herself travelling around the country to film her two TV shows – Sort Your Life Out for the BBC and Renovation Rescue on Channel 4.

    In November last year, Stacey made a brief return to Loose Women for one episode and explained her absence to viewers.

    She said: “It’s been crazy because Belle was a wonderful surprise, but what that meant was that I had to fit my filming schedule into a very short period of time.

     

    ” I’ve just been up and down the country with Sort Your Life Out and filming another show so I haven’t been able to even get into town.”

    Stacey also told her co-stars Kaye Adams, Judi Love and Katie Piper that she was “so happy” to be back on the show and that it had been like “therapy” for her.

    Stacey first joined the Loose Women panel in 2016 and quickly became a firm favourite among fans
    3

    Stacey first joined the Loose Women panel in 2016 and quickly became a firm favourite among fansCredit: Rex