Prince Harry sheds tears as CONTINUOUS financial difficulties leave him unable to support his children, will Meghan Markle humbly beg for a return to the British royal family?

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may have to scale back on their lavish lifestyle.

 

After King Charles III decided to take away their last remaining U.K. residence and cut the Duke and Duchess of Sussex off from the royal family payroll, insiders told Radar Harry and Meghan fear they could struggle to keep up with their outlandish spending habits.

 

“They never imagined they would be totally cut off,” a source close to the married couple spilled, adding they have been “bleeding money” since their move to the U.S.
“When Harry was a royal, he’d go on huge shopping sprees, glamorous vacations, and buy everyone drinks and dinner at expensive London restaurants,” the insider claimed. “Charles funded everything, so Harry didn’t have to think about money.”

 

According to the outlet, Harry and Meghan reportedly took out a $10 million mortgage on their $14.6 million six-bedroom Montecito estate, which has required a pretty penny to keep up. “Then there are the staffing and security bills,” the source explained.
The financial anxiety has not been for lack of trying. The parents-of-two signed multiyear deals with Netflix and Spotify, which rang in at a reported $100 million and $25 million, respectively. Most infamously, Harry reportedly signed a $35 million four-book deal with Penguin Random House, which launched his New York Times bestseller, Spare. However, people close to the power couple fear the profits “may not be enough to carry” their lifestyle.

The former Suits actress also recently cameoed in an Instagram ad for the coffee brand Clevr Blend, which she alleged she invested in back in 2020.
“Meghan wants to support women entrepreneurs like herself,” the insider explained of the move, adding, “but don’t think she’s doing it for nothing.”

 

ROYAL EXPERT CLAIMS MEGHAN MARKLE UNLIKELY TO RETURN TO THE UK WITH PRINCE HARRY IN THE NEAR FUTURE, DESPITE PRINCE WILLIAM AND PRINCESS KATE’S INVITATION.

Meghan Markle’s return to the UK is highly unlikely, claims a royal expert. While Prince Harry is scheduled to visit London in the coming months, Markle accompanying him with their children is not happening anytime soon. Recent reports suggested that Prince William and Princess Kate have been working to mend the royal rift and extended an invitation to the estranged family member, but Meghan declined the request.

MEGHAN MARKLE IS AVOIDING A TRIP TO THE UK

As confirmed by Harry himself and considering his plans to attend the Invictus Games event in May, the Duke of Sussex will make a quick trip to the UK. Earlier, Harry also expressed his desire to visit his ailing father, King Charles, who has been diagnosed with cancer. While many speculated that Meghan would accompany him to the palace, royal commentator Esther Krakue, in conversation with GB News, suggested that might not be the case.

“I actually think she’s avoiding the UK because she’s not interested in the whole drama and, kind of, being injected, is she going to talk to [Princess] Kate, and all of that.” Esther Krakue told the outlet.

MEGHAN MARKLE ‘CONCERNED’ ABOUT THE SAFETY

Things haven’t been going so well for the royals lately. Court cases, health issues, and the general state of affairs have been off the rails. Meghan is thought to be keeping a low profile due to security concerns after Harry lost a high court case against the Home Office, as well as a desire to avoid further conflict between her and Princess Kate.

“I personally think she’s not going to come because, obviously, Harry has lost his case with the Home Office and he said he doesn’t feel safe bringing his family over [to the UK] and I also think this is going to be a time where distance between the Sussexes and the Royal Family will be calcified because the focus will obviously be on the Princess of Wales and the King recovering, they don’t need the whole Netflix drama.” Claims Krakue.

PRINCE HARRY’S COURT BATTLE

Harry and Meghan have been residing in the US since they left the UK in early 2020 after announcing their decision to leave the royal family. Earlier this year, Harry lost a legal battle against the UK Home Office and RAVEC at the High Court in the United Kingdom. The Duke wanted to overturn a decision that reduced his security classification after he was no longer a “working royal” due to fears for his own safety and the safety of his wife, Meghan Markle, and two children Archie and Lilibet.

Thomas has since made several public pleas to reconcile, all of which Meghan has denied through representatives. Now, in a raw emotional interview, the 78-year-old retiree is speaking with a tearful tremor in his voice, claiming Meghan is threatening harm if he doesn’t stop discussing revelations that she has a secret 21-year-old daughter from a previous relationship.

According to Thomas, while Meghan cut him off years ago, anonymous texts have been sent in recent weeks warning him that his life is now at risk since going public with knowledge of this mystery child. Thomas claims that Meghan became pregnant at age 19, shortly after graduating high school in Los Angeles. Though not officially married, the father was from a brief relationship who chose not to be involved once learning of the pregnancy, not wanting to derail Meghan’s budding acting career or education dreams.Reportedly, Meghan gave birth in secret and placed the daughter for adoption shortly after through an obscure agency, keeping the whole ordeal hidden even from Thomas and Doria at the time. Now, tearfully holding up one of the threatening texts allegedly sent from Meghan through an encrypted app, Thomas professes his deep fears after being told directly, “Your life will be over if you keep talking.”

e pleads for his daughter to make contact and asks the messages to stop, claiming he only wants to reconcile before it’s too late. Thomas has now contacted the FBI for protection and voiced strong suspicions that this adopted daughter may be trying to reach out after learning the shocking truth herself.

If his story proves true, this could be the biggest royal scandal yet and has sent shockwaves through social media, with users demanding answers. While secrecy around adoption is understandable, many feel questions now need to be addressed regarding Meghan allegedly obscuring this monumental secret from even her own father and potential half-sister out there who deserves the truth.

On top of threatening behavior and using money to silence people, this paints the Duchess’s character in an even more unfavorable light. Countless messages pour in showing support for Thomas, with users slamming Meghan as being just like her sister Samantha due to harmful, premeditated behavior and constant lying through manipulation to craft narratives.

This time, involving serious allegations that strike at the heart of her credibility entirely. For naive North American royal fans, perhaps this marks their final break in belief too, upon witnessing how low she’ll sink with vicious intimidation involving family members speaking their truth.

Given their ongoing legal battles over a letter to Dad, Meghan’s camp wasted no time slamming Thomas as an opportunist controlled by evil forces, looking to capitalize, not denying specifics of his claims while spinning things as a money tactic.

But for royal experts and the British public still reeling over “Megxit” betrayals, threats against an aging father cross a major line. No amount of PR spin can counter; her silence speaks volumes as proof of conduct deserving no sympathy or title anymore after dangerous extremes taken.

All remaining supporters will have difficult questions too upon weighing Thomas’s account and demeanor against consistent victim narratives spun since “Megxit” began ripping a family apart. And what of this mystery daughter, desperate for answers, who finds herself at the center through no choice of her own? Privacy shields cannot outweigh questions surrounding potential half-sisters cut off from crucial roots at the hands of greed and power play.

Transparency is owed after so much harm done already, spanning generations torn apart by selfish acts. While the palace maintains silence, outside observers agree: enough proof exists now to rescind royal links and titles wielded to harm innocence.

Any public figure would face accountability for verified threats and using influence to oppress victims. Sorted secrets unveiled prove Meghan’s brand has devolved into a danger seeking damage control, not empowerment as falsely sold to naive publics manipulated for too long.

Hot news: Meghan Markle attempts to bribe Princess Anne to seize the throne, but the Princess leaves Meghan embarrassed in front of the world.

Princess Anne once left Meghan Markle “dumbfounded” when the actress sought out the hardworking royal for advice early on in her royal career. The Princess Royal reportedly advised the Duchess of Sussex to think of being royal “as a job” and not a means to become hugely famous.

The Duchess of Sussex was told by Princess Anne that being royal ‘is a job.’

“This senior royal takes no nonsense, much like her father, the late Duke of Edinburgh. Apparently, when Meghan Markle joined the royal family, she sought out Princess Anne,” royal expert Neil Sean dished. “According to a very good source, Princess Anne gave very sage advice to the new royal.”

He continued: “She [Anne] does endless amounts of engagements. She turns up, does the job, does not seek the limelight, and represents the Queen. I thought the recent visit together with the Queen to the Thames Hospice was wonderful. But apparently, Meghan left her meeting with Princess Anne dumbfounded. Princess Anne reiterated this mantra, she pointed out that it wasn’t a working monarchy, it was a job, you turn up on time, you do your research, and do the duty.”

The YouTube broadcaster then observed how the only daughter of Queen Elizabeth II shared: “It’s all about the project at hand. She also pointed out that whatever charities you are involved in, you need to get involved and get immersed.”

Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, speaking with Oprah Winfrey in March 2021.

“According to a very good source, Meghan Markle failed to warm to Princess Anne. And Princess Anne always knew that Meghan would have a very short shelf-life in the world of the British monarchy,” Sean concluded.

The Duchess of Sussex eventually decided not to follow Anne’s advice, as she found her brief tenure as a working senior royal to be troubling. She would go on to recount her experiences when she sat down with Oprah Winfrey, along with her husband, Prince Harry, in an explosive March 2021 interview.

Meghan Markle told Oprah Winfrey about her struggles with depression while in the royal family.

As The Royal Observer previously reported, Meghan got very candid in the question and answer session when it came to her mental health. “I just didn’t see a solution; I don’t understand how all of this is being churned out — again, I wasn’t seeing it, but it’s worse when you see it through your mom [and] friends,” she told the influential media mogul.

“It was all happening because I was breathing. Look, I was really ashamed to say it at the time and ashamed to have to admit to [Prince] Harry, especially because I know how much loss he’s suffered, but I knew that if I didn’t say it, I would do it, and I just didn’t — I didn’t want to be alive anymore,” the Duchess confessed.

The Duchess of Sussex spent roughly 20 months as a working member of the British monarchy.

Prince Harry’s Secret Meeting with King Charles and Prince William Sparks Meghan Markle’s Panic as He Begs for Return

The Duke of Delusion himself, Prince Harry, has made a stunning admission. He secretly pleaded before his estranged father and brother, begging for a return to the privileged life he once knew. This revelation comes after enduring Meghan’s relentless pursuit of celebrity across the pond. It seems that Harry’s operation “Respect My Truth” has come crashing down around him. The cracks in his facade of unwavering support for Meghan are becoming increasingly evident, as backlash and humiliation mount.

Now, let’s talk about Harry’s recent confession. This isn’t the first time such a meeting has taken place. Details of Harry’s earlier attempts at reconciliation were laid bare in his own memoir, which somehow managed to both vindicate his critics’ assessments of his immaturity and undermine his own self-indulgent narratives of victimhood.

In his book, Harry recounts a secret meeting with King Charles and Prince William during his trip back to the UK for Prince Philip’s funeral in 2021. This meeting occurred just months after he and Meghan publicly criticized the royal family on a global stage. Harry paints the scene as a high-stakes negotiation for his family’s future, but it’s really just a spoiled man-child begging to be let back into his ivory tower.

In a moment of vulnerability, Harry writes to his late mother’s spirit for luck, but his plea falls on deaf ears. What follows is a cringe-worthy display of submission as Harry kneels before the family he has spent years humiliating. This desperate bid for readmission into a life of privilege and wealth contradicts the persona Harry has cultivated as a noble renegade.

But does King Charles see any value in forgiving Harry’s flagrant insubordination? The risk of further damage to the monarchy’s reputation looms large, especially considering Harry’s history of blindly following Meghan’s agenda.

In the end, Harry’s return to the royal fold may only serve to grease the skids toward a ceremonial role, devoid of any real power or influence. Perhaps in this humbling experience, Harry will find the introspection to atone for his transgressions against duty and respectability. Or maybe he’ll continue down the path of self-destruction, blaming everyone but himself for his downfall.

London, UK — The Royal Family has announced the arrival of a new baby born to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The newborn has been named after Prince Harry, continuing the tradition of honoring royal heritage, but with a unique twist.

The baby’s full name has been revealed as Prince Harry Alexander, combining a homage to Prince Harry with the fresh, modern addition of Alexander. The couple chose this name to reflect both their respect for tradition and their desire to give their child a name with contemporary significance.

The announcement has been met with widespread excitement and congratulations from royal fans and the public alike. This new addition to the royal family is expected to play a significant role in the evolving narrative of the monarchy.

Prince Harry and Meghan, who have been residing in the United States, are reported to be overjoyed and are looking forward to introducing their newborn to the rest of the royal family. Further details about the baby’s birth and the couple’s future plans are expected to be shared in the coming days.

London, UK — The Royal Family has joyfully announced the arrival of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s newest baby. The newborn has been named in honor of Prince Harry, but with an additional, unique name.

The baby’s full name is Prince Harry Alexander, blending a tribute to Prince Harry with the fresh and modern name, Alexander. This choice reflects the couple’s respect for royal tradition while also embracing contemporary influences.

The announcement has been met with excitement and congratulations from royal fans and the public alike. This new addition to the royal family is expected to play a significant role in the evolving narrative of the monarchy.

Prince Harry and Meghan, currently residing in the United States, are thrilled and look forward to introducing their newborn to the rest of the royal family. Further details about the birth and the couple’s future plans are anticipated in the coming days.

A royal letdown. Meghan Markle won’t be attending father-in-law King Charles III’s coronation in May — and the monarch wishes she could be there.

“Charles is sad that Meghan will not be in attendance. Charles was hoping the coronation would be a chance to better connect and maintain healing between them,” a source exclusively tells Us Weekly.

Another insider adds: “King Charles is sad Meghan can not attend but is thrilled [Prince] Harry will be in attendance.”

Although Charles, 74, immediately became king after Queen Elizabeth II’s death in September 2022, his official coronation is scheduled for May 6 — the same day as Meghan, 41, and Harry’s son Archie’s 4th birthday. The couple — who tied the knot in May 2018 — also share daughter Lilibet, 22 months.

King Charles III and Meghan Markle Schneider-Press/SIPA/Shutterstock; Tim Rooke/Shutterstock
Buckingham Palace announced in a Wednesday, April 12, statement that Harry, 38, would attend the ceremony while “the Duchess of Sussex will remain in California with Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.” Us previously confirmed in March that both the prince and the Suits alum had been extended an invitation to the big day.

“I can confirm The Duke has recently received email correspondence from His Majesty’s office regarding the coronation,” a spokesperson for the couple said at the time.

Harry had previously been candid about his willingness to attend the event despite his estrangement from his father and his brother, Prince William.

“There’s a lot that can happen between now and then,” he said during his January ITV interview. “But, you know, the door is always open. The ball is in their court. There’s a lot to be discussed and I really hope that they are willing to sit down and talk about it.”

The Spare author and Meghan have been at odds with the royal family since they stepped back from their roles as senior royals in 2020. They have spoken out against the U.K. media and The Firm on numerous occasions, including in their March 2021 tell-all CBS interview and their December 2022 Netflix docuseries, Harry & Meghan.

“You would just see it play out, like a story about someone in the family would pop up for a minute, and they’d go, ‘We’ve got to make that go away,’ but there’s real estate on a website homepage,” Meghan explained in Harry & Meghan, claiming that fake stories about her were planted in the press to draw attention away from other royals.

Harry’s attendance at Charles’ coronation will mark his first time reuniting with his family since the queen’s funeral in September 2022 — and the release of his bombshell memoir, which dropped in January. Despite his criticism of the family business, the Duke of Sussex has said that he wants to mend fences with his clan.

“I would like to get my father back. I would like to have my brother back,” the Archewell cofounder said during his ITV sit-down earlier this year, after claiming that his family had “shown absolutely no willingness to reconcile.”

Meghan and Charles, for their part, have had their good moments over the years, despite turmoil in the family. The former Prince of Wales walked the actress — who is estranged from her father, Thomas Markle — down the aisle during her nuptials to Harry.

 

“Prince Charles was very touched to be asked by Meghan to walk her down the aisle and he is very much looking forward to welcoming her into the family,” a Buckingham Palace source exclusively told Us in May 2018.

Meghan later recalled the moment she asked Charles to escort her to the altar on her wedding day.

“Harry’s dad is very charming. And … I said to him, like, ‘I’ve lost my dad in this.’ So, him as my father-in-law was really important to me,” she said in the fourth episode of Harry & Meghan. “I asked him to walk me down the aisle and he said yes. The whole thing was surreal. It was at that moment, I could also see H.”

Harry & Meghan Slam Critics Over Use Of Royal Titles On New Website: ‘It Is Their Surname!’

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle recently launched a new website that prominently features their royal titles and coat of arms, fuelling speculations that they’re trying to resurrect their media careers.

However, what raised eyebrows is the notable absence of any direct reference to their roles within the monarchy. Critics said they may run into trouble with the monarchy, with some claiming the site could be shut down.

A source close to the Sussexes has now hit back at naysayers, stating that Sussex is “their surname.”

‘Sussex’ Is Prince Harry & Meghan Markle’s ‘Family Name’

MEGA

According to the Daily Mail, a source close to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has seemingly objected to the public disapproval following the launch of their new website, Sussex.com.

The new homepage for “The Office of Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex,” which was launched without any media buzz or announcement, prompted speculations that they’re trying to resurrect their media career after enduring quite a challenging 2023.

The move drew backlash from many quarters as critics argued that they shouldn’t use their royal titles since they stepped back from their roles as senior royals, but a source close to the pair has now hit back, defending the use of their titles.

The source told the news outlet, “Prince Harry and Meghan are the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. That is a fact. It is their surname and family name.”

How Will The Monarchy React To The New Sussex Website?

MEGA

While the website provides details about them and their activities, including sections dedicated to both their biographies, there is a distinct lack of the phrase “serving the monarchy,” which was prominent on their previous website, SussexRoyal.com.

The move has drawn complaints from different quarters as sources say Buckingham Palace will not be comfortable with their initiative. Also, allegations about them launching the site for commercial purposes are rife, as an insider told the news outlet Harry and Meghan are “going to have real trouble with the use of Sussex.”

“It is a royal title and if there is any hint of commercialism about this it will be shut down. It’s just staggering they cannot see how gauche it is,” the insider said.

On the website, Harry is described as a “humanitarian, military veteran, mental health advocate, and environmental campaigner,” while Meghan is hailed as a “feminist and champion of human rights and gender equity.”

In addition to their newly launched site, the couple also have websites for Archewell Productions (archewellproductions.com) and Archewell Foundation (archewell.org). The former Archewell.com website now redirects viewers to Sussex.com.

Prince Harry And Meghan Markle Head To Canada For Invictus Games

MEGA

The royal couple’s website launch comes as Harry gets set to launch the Invictus Games tomorrow in Canada. The event, which will be held between Wednesday and Friday, seeks to create awareness for the 2025 Invictus Games, which will take place between February 8 and February 16 next year.

During their time there, they will meet with participants in the nation’s Winter Training Camp, including team managers, coaches, and competitors.

The Duke previously described how much of a connection he shares with Canada, noting that he and his wife “could imagine spending the rest of our lives there.” Meghan has also expressed love for the count,ry having lived in Toronto while filming “Suits.”

In his 2023 memoir “Spare,” Harry wrote that Vancouver gave him a “taste of freedom” and wondered what it would be like having that experience year in, year out.

“What if life could be like that … all the time?” he wrote. “What if we could spend at least part of each year somewhere far away, still doing work for the Queen, but beyond the reach of the press?”

“If we could just find a place the press didn’t know about, we said, Canada might be the answer. Meg got in touch with a Vancouver friend, who connected us with an estate agent, and we started looking at houses,” Harry added.

Prince Harry Visited King Charles Without Meghan Markle

MEGA

The Duke of Sussex recently made a quick dash from Los Angeles last week to visit his ailing father, King Charles, after he was diagnosed with cancer.

He arrived in the U.K. last Tuesday and headed straight to Clarence House, where Charles and Queen Camilla live. He reportedly stayed in a hotel as he and Meghan already vacated their Frogmore Cottage home in Windsor last March after stepping back from their royal roles in 2020 and moving to the U.S.

According to reports, Harry didn’t meet with his brother, Prince William, although a source noted that he would have “gladly accepted” the chance to reunite with the Prince of Wales if the opportunity had risen. Another source said that his travel to the U.K. was not to “act as some kind of vehicle for reconciliation.”

King Charles facing ‘difficult situation’ in bid to oust Prince Andrew from Royal Lodge

King Charles facing ‘difficult situation’ in bid to oust Prince Andrew

King Charles is facing a very “difficult situation” as his younger brother refuses to move out of Royal Lodge despite being asked to downsize, according to GB News’ Digital Royal Editor.

The Duke of York Prince currently lives in the £30million home but the King wants his brother to move into the much smaller Frogmore Cottage, which requires less expensive upkeep and was previously the UK base for Harry and Meghan.

 

With His Majesty controlling the purse strings for Royal household finances, there’s speculation he may cut back on funding, potentially leaving Prince Andrew in a bind to cover the high costs of the property’s security and maintenance.

Prince Andrew ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, appeared on Good Morning Britain and tactfully confirmed the brothers’ conflict.

Sarah Ferguson said she is “staying out of it”

ReutersShe told the programme: “It’s not a Debbie Downer. It’s life in the fast lane. ‘I’m a guest for a start, I am a very lucky guest. And a very comfortable guest, thank you very much.

“I tend not to get involved in brothers’ discussions and I think that’s the safest place to be.”

 

Cameron and Svar discussed the drama on this week

Speaking about her comments on this week’s episode of The Royal Record podcast GB News Digital Royal Editor Svar Nanan-Sen said: “The situation is complicated by the fact Prince Andrew has a 75 year lease agreement for the Royal Lodge, which he signed in 2003.”

Royal Correspondent Cameron Walker added: “That lease agreement is with the Crown Estate is not with King Charles, which leaves King Charles with a bit of a difficult situation because he can’t evict his brother because it’s the Crown Estate. It’s not him.”

Svar agreed, stating: “Yes. And the agreement is valid until 2078, so there’s a long way to go on it. Sarah Ferguson appeared on ITV this week and actually confirmed that the feud is ongoing. She described it as life in the fast lane.”

It comes after The Times alleged that the King is renewing his efforts to evict Andrew from Royal Lodge, threatening him with being cut off financially if he did not comply.

Andrew is refusing to move out the property

GETTY

The article claimed the King would “reconsider the levels of support he is willing to provide” unless Andrew moved out.

It also alleged that King Charles is supporting the duke in the “low millions” of pounds per annum.

A source told the publication: “The King’s kindness is not without limit, and there is a very good option for Andrew to move into Frogmore Cottage… which also has the benefit of being within the Windsor Castle security cordon hence reducing the need for alternative round-the-clock security for Royal Lodge.”

Speaking about the brother’s feud to the Daily Beast, a source close to Fergie said: “Sarah has never sought to rock the boat.

King Charles is facing a difficult situation

GETTY

“She has said very publicly that she is grateful to have been brought back into the family by the late Queen and she is of course very grateful that has carried on under Charles.That’s a different thing to selling out her family,” the friend said, “She is fiercely loyal to Andrew.”

Friends of the Duke of York have also spoken out in support of him, with one telling the outlet: “Andrew does not have a huge amount in his life any more, the house is one of the few things keeping him going.

“The idea that he is going to throw that away along with his children’s inheritance is just absurd.

“The place is perfectly well maintained and the notion that Andrew is in dire financial straits is not remotely accurate.

 

Prince Andrew’s ‘rift’ with King Charles could spark unintended benefit for Queen Camilla

James May under fire as Grand Tour star blasted for ‘disappointing’ and ‘disingenuous’ plea to fans: ‘Respect people!’

The Duke of York has lived in Royal Lodge since 2003

Prince Andrew’s “rift” with King Charles could spark an unintended benefit for Queen Camilla, royal sources have claimed.

The brothers are currently locked in crunch talks over Royal Lodge, the Duke of York’s home since 2003.

 

The King, 75, is said to have made it clear that he wants Andrew to move out and live elsewhere.

However, Andrew is “refusing to budge, much to the frustration of his brother”, according to reports in The Times.

A source close to Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew told The Daily Mail that the King sees Royal Lodge as a potential future home for Queen Camilla.

Royal commentator Richard Eden wrote: “As dowager Queen, Camilla would be stepmother – not mother – to King William.

“And William will inherit everything, just as Charles did from his mother, including Clarence House, where Charles and Camilla live when they are in London.

“As Prince of Wales, William already owns the King’s beloved Gloucestershire home, Highgrove.

Royal Lodge was formerly the home of the Queen MotherPA

“So, Charles will be determined to make sure that Camilla is kept in the manner to which she has become accustomed.

“Might that include guaranteeing her a ‘country’ bolthole in Windsor Great Park?”

It was previously reported that the Prince and Princess of Wales could move into Royal Lodge.

However, a source close to Prince William and Princess Kate told the publication that the couple are very happy at Adelaide Cottage and have no wish to move.

Charles & Andrew feud ‘has NO end in sight – they’ve never been close & duke is embarrassment to the King’, expert says

KING Charles and Prince Andrew were never close and are very different people – with no end in sight to their feud, a royal expert claims.

The monarch, 75, is allegedly threatening to severe ties with his younger brother the Duke of York, 64, over his failure to vacate Royal Lodge.

8

Prince Andrew and King Charles have never been very close, an expert claimsCredit: Getty

8

Prince Andrew was forced to step back from royal dutiesCredit: Getty

8

The Duke of York refuses to leave Royal LodgeCredit: Doug Seeburg

8

King Charles is keen to cut costs and slim down the Firm
Andrew – often dubbed Elizabeth II’s favourite child – shares the home, on the grounds of Windsor Castle, with his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson and is reported to be refusing to budge.

The shamed duke will never return to public duty after paying millions to settle an abuse case with a Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking victim, and Charles has been trying to evict him from the 30-room property for 18 months.

Since taking the throne, the King has been looking to cut costs, including slimming down the core of the Firm itself.

Charles and Andrew’s feud appears to mirror that of the King’s own sons Prince William and Prince Harry.

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told The Sun: “The King has undoubtedly got a problem, and the Royal Family very, very clearly have extremely serious and embarrassing perpetual problem with Prince Andrew.”

He said the differences between the two brothers, however, have been striking their whole lives.

“They seem to have gone on as complete opposites, really, in so many ways,” he explained.

“Of course, there’s a 12-year age gap between King Charles and Prince Andrew,” he continued, adding they “hadn’t got that much in common”.

“Charles is rather sort of intellectual, serious, sensitive. Andrew rather bumptious, outgoing.”

He did point out the siblings shared the feat of being “considered amongst the most desirable males on the planet” in their youths.

Usher Prince William leads glam arrivals at wedding of Prince George & Archie’s godfather Duke of Westminster
And aside from their differing personalities, Mr Fitzwilliams said: “I think they got on reasonably well in the early years.”

In fact, there was a “long period” when they “conducted engagements together, and so forth”, he added.

“Apparently Charles used to like to read to Andrew when he was very young.”

Andrew was even one of the best men at the then-Prince of Wales‘ wedding to Princess Diana in 1981.

Mr Fitzwilliams said: “It seems that at their distance they got on pretty well over quite a long period of time.”

He pinpointed the period when Andrew’s marriage to the Duchess of York “started to disintegrate, and Sarah Ferguson was involved in a variety of controversial activities” that bad blood came to the surface.

“I mean, I think, very clearly Charles had doubts,” he continued, adding there were issues with “the way Andrew handled his post” as a “special representative for British trade”.

“Things culminating, obviously, with the disastrous interview on Newsnight, but I mean Andrew’s friendship with the deceased paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was the reason that he lost his job, and Charles must have been very concerned about the some of the company that his brother was keeping.”

King Charles and Prince Andrew’s relationship

King Charles and Prince Andrew are reported to have been closer as children, despite their 12-year age gap.

There are claims the now-monarch used to read bedtime stories to the young Duke of York, and they did attend royal duties together.

In 1981, Andrew was one of multiple best men at Charles’ wedding to Princess Diana.

Some royal experts suggest their relationship began to waiver after the Duke began dating Sarah Ferguson in 1985, who he then married the following year.

Richard Fitzwilliams pinpointed the period when Andrew’s marriage “started to disintegrate, and Sarah Ferguson was involved in a variety of controversial activities” that bad blood came to the surface.

“I mean, I think, very clearly Charles had doubts,” he continued, adding there were also issues with “the way Andrew handled his post” as a “special representative for British trade”.

In November 2019, things really came to a head when Andrew’s disastrous Newsnight interview was aired, in which he failed to say he regretted his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

The pair appear to have first met in the early 1990s.

Mr Fitzwilliams added: “Charles must have been very concerned about the some of the company that his brother was keeping.”

Andrew was forced back from royal duties after the BBC broadcast and was later stripped of various titles and patronages amid his legal dispute with Virginia Giuffre.

Any hope that the attitude towards Andrew would soften now that Charles is King doesn’t appear realistic.

Andrew was forced by the late Queen to take a step back from active duties after the car crash interview in November 2019 – dramatised this year in Netflix show Scoop.

And he was eventually stripped of his titles and patronages amid his court ordeal with trafficking victim Virginia Giuffre.

Referring to the Royal Lodge dispute, Mr Fitzwilliams said: “You could argue what’s the point of him now?

“He has no royal role, he never will have. So what happens, and then he should get any money.

“Well, this is up to the King, obviously. It’s an embarrassing situation.

“The facts are, however, he still remains a terrible and dreadful embarrassment to the Royal Family, but that is a different matter.”

He described Andrew living at Royal Lodge “at a peppercorn rent”, adding he “certainly” does not think Charles “wants some form of public showdown”.

“Since Andrew’s got to live somewhere, since he’s actually got a lease, it’s very difficult to so to speak, evict,” Mr Fitzwilliams continued.

“I don’t see this dying down at all but I don’t see it resolving itself.

“You look over a long period of time span, and you see what the King sees, and that is that Andrew… has no obvious future.”

8

Prince Andrew in his youth with a rose between his teeth in front of the late QueenCredit: Getty

8

Royal Lodge sits within the Windsor estateCredit: Rex

8

Andrew riding a horse on the Windsor groundsCredit: Doug Seeburg

8

Andrew with his ex wife Sarah Ferguson and daughters Princess Eugenie, and Princess BeatriceCredit: Social Media – Refer to Source

HOT NEWS: Princess Anne announces her intention to assist Harry in ascending to the throne and Meghan becoming Queen: With one condition.

Prince Harry’s recent behavior towards Princess Anne has stirred speculation about tension within the royal family, particularly ahead of an anticipated reunion. According to a body language specialist, Harry displayed unusual gestures towards his aunt at last year’s king’s coronation. With just a few weeks until his next trip to the UK, Harry’s previous visit was marked by signs of nervousness, observed during a significant event where he was seated alongside his cousins, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. Notably, Meghan Markle chose to stay in the US with their children, leaving Harry to attend alone.

Body language expert Judy James noted Harry’s apparent anxiety, citing increased blinking and lip movements, possibly indicative of nerves or heightened adrenaline levels. When Princess Anne approached Harry’s seat, his demeanor shifted, with his head dropping and gaze fixed on her. Despite this, Harry seemed content chatting with his cousins and their spouses, demonstrating a strong bond with them, particularly evident in his interactions with Eugenie and Beatrice’s husband.

Amid preparations for the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games, Harry is slated to return to the UK for a special event at St Paul’s Cathedral. While Meghan’s attendance remains to be confirmed, both are urged to reconcile and set aside past grievances for the sake of the royal family’s cohesion and growth.

Royal author Christopher Anderson suggests that Harry’s return presents an opportunity for him to contribute part-time to royal duties, easing the burden on other family members, particularly amid King Charles and Princess Kate’s undisclosed health concerns. However, reconciling with Prince William, who is reportedly dealing with Kate’s illness in secret, may pose challenges.

Ultimately, Harry’s potential return could either enhance his value to the monarchy or exacerbate existing tensions within the family. The path forward involves navigating past grievances and prioritizing the collective welfare of the royal household.