Meghan Markle caught in major ‘snub’ after secret change on Archie’s birth certificate

Meghan Markle made one particular move which was dubbed as a ‘huge snub’ to Princess William and Princess Kate.

Prince Archie’s certificate was altered (Image: Getty)

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry once made an “unprecedented” move regarding their son, Prince Archie’s birth certificate which was dubbed as a major “snub” to the Prince and Princess of Wales.

The Duchess of Sussex altered Archie’s birth certificate just days after his birth was officially registered.

According to the Sun, the birth certificate was altered to show his mother as “Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex” instead of the original “Rachel Meghan”.

Harry and Meghan’s eldest child was born on May 6, 2019, with his birth registered 11 days later before the amendment was made on June 5.

The outlet at the time reported that this was a “snub” to Prince William and Princess Kate, who used Kate’s names on their children’s certificates.

Prince Archie was born in 2019 (Image: Getty)
Stay up-to-date with the latest Royal newsJoin us on WhatsApp

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

It also suggested the intention was to place Meghan on an equal footing with Prince Harry’s mother Princess Diana, who would always use “Her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales”.

However, a spokesman for the Sussexes insisted that the move was “dictated by The Palace” and not “requested” by Meghan nor Harry.

Just days after the change, Harry and Meghan left the Royal Foundation – the so-called Fab Four’s joint charity – and months later they quit their royal duties and moved to the US.

Meanwhile, Lady Colin Campbell, who spotted the amendment, said: “It is extraordinary and raises all kinds of questions about what the Sussexes were thinking.”

 

Prince Harry’s comments comparing Meghan Markle to Princess Diana left fans livid

Fans were left feeling unimpressed by Prince Harry’s comments comparing his wife Meghan Markle to the late Princess Diana of Wales.

Harry stated Meghan Markle reminded her of his mother, Diana (Image: Getty)

Many fans believe Meghan Markle differs significantly from Princess Diana despite Prince Harry’s favourable comparisons made in his bombshell Netflix documentary titled ‘Harry & Meghan’, released in December 2022.

Speaking of his wife, who Harry married in May 2018, he told documentary makers: “So much of what Meghan is, and how she is, is so similar to my mum.”

He further explained: “She has the same compassion, she has the same empathy, she has the same confidence. She has this warmth about her.”

As he spoke, the episode featured clips of Meghan and Diana intertwined. A clip of Diana holding a young Harry on her hip as she walked behind Prince William played before a clip showing Meghan and the couple’s son Archie, holding hands and running in a garden.

However, fans on social media, have opposed his views and doubted the comparisons. User @RCaron67 wrote: “Meghan wants to be loved like Diana without having any of the qualities that made her relatable.”

Whereas user, @thutmose4th joked: “This makes me want to throw up…”

Another offered a slight balance of opinion: “I assume he sees more than we see through private interaction. That said, I do not see a comparison between the People’s Princess and the Hollywood Actress. It is genuine compassion versus narcissism.”

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

Meghan stepped down as a senior working royal in 2020 (Image: Getty)

Despite the criticism fans made in the comparison, the Netflix documentary also tugged at fans’ heartstrings as Meghan Markle carried a baby Prince Archie on her hip, pointing to a picture of Diana in his nursery and saying “That’s your grandma, Diana”.

Commenting on the sweet interaction, one fan said: “Got so choked up watching Archie touch his Grandma Diana’s hand in the photo, and speaking his Baby talk talk to his beloved GRAND MAMA.”

Diana died in a car accident in Paris in 1997, when she was 36 years old and Harry was only 12 years old at the time of her death.

The crash has been blamed on paparazzi, who had been following the princess while driving through Paris. It also resulted in the deaths of Dodi Fayed, and her chauffeur, Henri Paul.

Prince Harry has previously claimed that men in the royal family have a “temptation or urge to marry someone who fits in the mould, as opposed to somebody who you are perhaps destined to be with”.

He added: “The difference between making decisions with your head, or your heart. And my mum [Diana] made most of her decisions, if not all of them, from her heart. And I am my mother’s son.”

Prince Harry threatens to sue BBC over claims he didn’t ask Queen’s permission to name his daughter Lilibet

FURIOUS Prince Harry has threatened to sue the BBC for libel over claims he did not ask the Queen’s permission to name his baby daughter Lilibet.

In a legal letter yesterday he demanded that the corporation stop repeating the allegation.

 

8

Prince Harry has threatened to sue the BBCCredit: Splash

8

The Duke of Sussex has threatened legal action over claims he didn’t ask the Queen about naming his daughter LilibetCredit: PA
The Beeb had reported that a senior Buckingham Palace source confirmed Harry “never asked” his grandmother about using her personal nickname for the newborn.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex had earlier told the BBC via close sources that Harry, 36, did, in fact, speak to the Queen and “would have mentioned the name” to his grandmother.

And in a swift and aggressive rebuttal to the BBC’s report, Harry threatened to sue for libel through London law firm Schillings.

A spokesman for Harry insisted he “spoke with his family in advance of the birth announcement” and the Queen was “the first family member he called”.

They added: “During that conversation, he shared their hope of naming their daughter Lilibet in her honour. Had she not been supportive, they would not have used the name.”

QUEEN WAS ‘SUPPORTIVE’

Sources last night told The Sun there was “irritation” from the Palace at claims by Harry and wife Meghan’s camp that they had told the 95-year-old monarch in advance about the tribute.

The source added Harry “never asked” the Queen for permission, saying: “A phone call was made before the public announcement — but the question was never asked. The news was simply presented to the Queen.”

The Sussexes said the Queen was “supportive” of the idea and would have made clear if she was not happy.

8

Harry and Meghan welcomed their second child on June 4Credit: Getty

8

The Sussexes put out this statement after Lilibet’s birth

8

We told of their joy on Monday
However, a source said: “There was irritation that Harry and Meghan insisted in public that it was done by the book. But as far as the Palace was concerned, it wasn’t.”

Harry and Meghan have firmly denied the BBC’s claims.

The legal letter followed counter-briefings from Harry and Meghan through journalist ally Omid Scobie, author of their bombshell biography Finding Freedom.

Mr Scobie said the couple would not have used the name Lilibet for their daughter unless the Queen had supported the move.

Legal experts say Harry would have the upper hand in court.

Media lawyer Mark Stephens said: “He would have been defamed simply by being called a liar.

“In terms of who would win a legal battle, the Queen cannot be compelled to give evidence so the BBC would be having to rely on a confidential source who would be unlikely to come forward.

“You then have Harry who would say he had first-hand knowledge of the conversation because it was he who spoke to his grandmother.”

8

The couple named their newborn after the Queen, whose personal nickname is LilibetCredit: Reuters

8

A spokesman for Harry insisted he spoke with the family ahead of Lili’s birth announcementCredit: AFP
The row followed Sunday’s announcement that Harry and Meghan, 39, would be calling their second child Lilibet ‘Lili’ Diana Mountbatten-Windsor.

In terms of who would win a legal battle, the Queen cannot be compelled to give evidence so the BBC would be having to rely on a confidential source.

Mark Stephens

The baby, born in California on Friday, shares the nickname Prince Philip called his wife for more than 70 years.

It was first given to Her Majesty by her father King George VI when young Elizabeth struggled to ­pronounce her name properly.

‘DEEPLY PERSONAL’

Royal experts suggested using the Queen’s personal nickname would have upset the monarch as it is “deeply personal” to her.

Royal biographer Lady Colin Campbell reckoned the Queen reacted with “cold fury”.

She added: “It’s a ravagement of the Queen’s privacy and identity.”

Meanwhile Angela Levin, author of Prince Harry: Conversations with the Prince, suggested the Duke could have held a ­conversation about names with the Queen — but only given “half information”.

She said: “If you think back to the Oprah chat he did about ­mental health, he started working with her in 2019 when he was still in the Royal Family.

8

Legal experts say Harry would have the upper hand in courtCredit: Reuters
“He asked the Queen for permission and she gave it on the understanding the programme was about the Invictus Games — damaged and wounded military men and women and talking about their mental health.

“But what actually happened is he was vile about his own family.

“Harry gives out half the information so the Queen says yes, and then he diverts.

“What he likely said is that he’d like to name the baby after her and she would have said ‘how lovely’, thinking it would be Elizabeth as a first or middle name. Prince ­William had done as much with Princess Charlotte.

“But I can’t imagine for a second he specifically said ‘Lilibet’ and she allowed it. It’s a huge invasion of her privacy.”

It is the latest souring of relations between Buckingham Palace ­officials and the Sussexes since they quit the Royal Family last year for the US with son Archie, two.

Tensions boiled over following an Apple TV interview with Oprah Winfrey in March, when Harry and Meghan alleged they suffered racism and neglect while part of the Royal Family.

Harry’s legal threats to the BBC come weeks after he and Prince William blasted the corporation for its treatment of their mother.

The Sun says

“PRINCE Harry is coming across like a typical f***ing woke snowflake, f***ing a***hole. Just don’t be f***ing dissing your family because there’s no need for it.”

No, it’s not an official statement from Buckingham Palace. Nor the words of Prince William. They’re from national treasure Noel Gallagher.

William may have said something similar in private. We cannot know.
Likewise we can only guess exactly what was said when Harry contacted the Queen, apparently to ask consent to bestow her highly personal nickname Lilibet on his new daughter.

He and Meghan insist that if Her Maj had said No they’d have thought again. OK. But a senior Palace source claims to the BBC that’s not so. That they never really sought her permission.

We all know “recollections may vary”. But is it really plausible the Californian Oprah-botherers just made this one up?

Why won’t the Palace officially back their version of events?

A damning report concluded Beeb journalist Martin Bashir, 58, had forged bank statements to secure his exclusive 1995 interview with Princess Diana, two years before she died in a car crash.

 

Prince William, 38, slammed the BBC, insisting the failings “not only let my mother down, and my family down; they let the public down”.

Meanwhile, younger brother Harry also blasted the Corporation, saying: “Our mother lost her life because of this.”

Prince Harry seen for the first time since row with Palace over using Queen’s name Lilibet for baby daughter

Meghan Markle bitterly blasted as ‘cold, rude and a total opportunist’ by controversial author Lady Colin Campbell

CONTROVERSIAL royal author Lady Colin Campbell has cruelly blasted Meghan Markle as being “cold, rude and a total opportunist.”

The Jamaican-born British author, 70, said the Duchess of Sussex, 38, cost Prince Harry, 35, “most of his friends” and was rude at his best friend’s wedding.

5

Meghan Markle has been cruelly slammed as ‘rude’ and an ‘opportunist’ in Lady Colin Campbell’s new royal bookCredit: The Mega Agency
The extraordinary revelations were revealed in an extract from her book Meghan And Harry: The Real Story.

As reported by Femail, Lady Colin said a source told her Meghan “froze out” other guests at the wedding of Prince Harry’s pal Charlie Van Straubenzee to Daisy Jenks.

In the new book, Lady Colin writes: “A girl went up to Meghan, introduced herself, and said how beautiful she thought she was. She said she knew it was Meghan’s birthday and wished her a happy birthday.

“Meghan looked at her as if she had committed a great faux pas by speaking to her and walked off.

5

The Jamaican-born British author Lady C said the Duchess of Sussex has cost Prince Harry “most of his friends” Credit: Rex Features
“It was so cold.”

Lady Colin quotes “someone who witnessed the exchange” as saying it was “really rude”.

The royal author continues that a “worse” encounter happened at the wedding breakfast when another girl told Meghan how much she admired her.

Lady Colin writes: “She told her [Meghan] she was rooting for them and wished them well. Meghan’s response? She looked her up and down, turned away without saying a word.”

It is not known if Lady Colin, who penned the 1992 biography, Diana in Private: The Princess Nobody Knows, has ever met the royal couple.

5

Lady C claims a source told her Meghan ‘froze out’ other guests at the wedding of Prince Harry’s pal Charlie Van Straubenzee to Daisy JenksCredit: Rex Features
Her unofficial biography comes ahead of Harry and Meghan’s new biography Finding Freedom in August, written by Omid Scobie.

Lady Colin claimed to Page Six that Harry will be “too weak” to leave Meghan, and the former Suits actress has “caused him to lose most of his friends”.

Page Six reports an extract of the book says: “She’s [Meghan] a total opportunist.

“She knew in advance she’d embark on commercial ventures, which royalty strictly forbids.”

It continues: “She now has what she wanted — a millionaire’s life in Hollywood. She’s caused Harry to lose most of his friends.

“He’s weaker than she. He’s run ragged. Despite the sex, she will make his life miserable. He has no strength of character to leave her.”

5

Meghan, pictured at the wedding of Harry’s pal, is said to have snubbed a few female guests

5

Lady Colin’s book comes ahead of journalist Omid Scobie’s biography on Harry and MeghanCredit: The Mega Agency
This week, Lady Colin appeared on This Morning, and claimed Meghan wants to “run for President” of the United States in the bizarre interview.

Speaking to hosts Phillip Schofield and Holly Willoughby live from her home, Lady C said: “That is what she told people.

“She’s told people her ultimate ambition is to run for President.

“And she announced last week that she is going into politics, notwithstanding the fact that no member of the British royal family is allowed to enter politics.”

We shared how Meghan and Prince Harry were pictured volunteering alongside former gang members baking food for vulnerable in LA.

And the royal couple could earn £1m per speech after signing to same agency as Serena Williams and the Obamas.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attend the garden party for Prince Charles’ 70th birthday

We pay for your stories and videos! Do you have a story or video for The Scottish Sun? Email us at [email protected] or call 0141 420 5300

Loose Women’s Charlene sparks exit fears as she warns ‘three strikes and I’m out’

Loose Women star Charlene White was left fearing the worst on the ITV daytime show, as she was warned by panellist Coleen Nolan live on-air after being late to a meeting

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. More info

Charlene White, Loose Women’s chief panelist, sent fans into a frenzy about her future on the show when she received a live on-air warning for being tardy.

The discussion centred on punctuality, involving the panel members Brenda Edwards, Coleen Nolan and Natalie Cassidy from EastEnders. Charlene opened the conversation noting: “First Natalie, apparently, was early for our morning meeting today. I say ‘apparently’ because I was late! But you’re always on time for everything, right?”

To which Natalie admitted: “On time for me is early,” triggering laughter among the audience and fellow stars. However, an unimpressed Coleen was quick to retort: “If you’re late for work, for me, that’s really unprofessional.”

Despite Charlene’s attempts at defending herself saying, “It was out of my control, just saying!” Coleen nonchalantly warned her: “Well I’m going to take a note. That’s your first warning, live on-air.” To this, Charlene reacted with a worried giggle, jokingly asking: “Three strikes and I’m out?”

Charlene White received a stern warning on Loose Women (Image: No credit)
Later in the show, Brenda Edwards also found herself in hot water as Charlene scolded her for laughing through a segment concerning her “mystery man”. Threatening to reveal his identity, Charlene sternly told Brenda: “I’m actually gonna ban Brenda from this programme if she doesn’t stop giggling. I love you though.”

Brenda’s bloke turned out to be a figment of her imagination she’d “manifested” him in hopes of attracting a real Mr. Right. Brenda reckons that decent chaps only pop up when she’s taken, so she’s conjured up a pretend partner for now.

“I’m going to end it there, because I really don’t know where else I can go with that one,” Charlene quipped, abruptly wrapping up the segment on the ITV daytime telly programme.

Coleen Nolan had some choice words for the star (Image: No credit)
In another part of the show, Natalie was eager to share the pearls of wisdom the late Dame Barbara Windsor imparted during their time on EastEnders. However, things took a turn when Charlene spilled the beans on a “private” natter they’d had off-air.

Charlene dished: “She could be tough with you without saying a word. Like, if you’d had a night out when you were working the next day?”

Charlene worried ‘three strikes and I’m out?’ (Image: ITV)

Want all the biggest Showbiz and TV news straight to your inbox? Sign up for our free Daily Star Showbiz newsletter.

Natalie clapped back: “Thank you for that! It was a private conversation in the green room! But I remember going out with H from Steps one night – it was early 2000s, maybe very late 90s.”

“I came into work and it was in the days when EastEnders stars were on the front of papers, it was a big thing back then. I remember walking in and me and H from Steps were on the front of The Sun. I remember walking past and seeing Barbara with a paper. I was like, ‘I have been out but I am on time!’ but I don’t think I ever did it again!” she confessed.

Scroll back up to restore default view.

Loose Women’s Charlene White has recalled the terrifying experience of witnessing a street robbery, remembering the horrifying moment that she heard a woman screaming.

ITV newsreader Charlene, 43, spoke about the scary ordeal on the episode of Loose Women on Thursday 18 April, where she told her co-stars about feeling suspicious of two young people riding past on bikes and then realising that they had just robbed someone.

She explained that she had been at a bus stop when two young people wearing balaclavas cycled past her and quickly turned a corner of the road, before she heard a woman screaming.

Charlene admitted she had felt “annoyed” with herself for not taking a photo of them, which she had thought about doing because she felt suspicious.

Charlene White has spoken about witnessing a robbery -Credit:ITV
She said: “As I was walking towards the bus stop two bikes came in front of me. I looked up and I realised they were wearing balaclavas.

“Now living in London, there’s a load of cyclists and cyclists do wear balaclavas because it protects them from the cold air. But it’s very rare to see it on younger cyclists. So I was like, ‘Something doesn’t seem right’. I’m really annoyed with myself because I said ‘It doesn’t seem right because I know what they’re about to do, the likelihood is that they’re going to try to steal somebody’s phone’.”

The TV star continued: “So I was like ‘I need to take a picture’ and then I didn’t, and then they turned a corner and about 20 seconds later I heard a woman scream and they had stolen her phone.”

The Loose Women star opened up on the terrifying ordeal -Credit:Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock
Earlier this year, Charlene told fans about an allergic reaction she had been suffering around her eyes, asking people not to comment on her appearance on Loose Women.

She posted on Instagram in February: “Before the ‘ewww what’s wrong with her eyes!!’ messages start flooding my inbox after @loosewomen, I’ve had an allergic reaction to something (and have had for months now) but it’s pretty bad this morning. Could barely open my eyes at 3am.

“But huge thank-you to Loose make-up’s @francescajordan for doing a stellar camouflage job and covering it up. And yes I know putting make-up on won’t help the situation, but it was too late to not come into work. Such is life. Anyway, swipe to see what Fran’s magic hands achieved. Very grateful. (and yes, I’m booked in with a specialist this week… finally!)”

Hollywood was shaken by a dramatic confrontation involving actors Johnny Depp and Meghan Markle this morning. The incident unfolded when M

Hollywood was shaken by a dramatic confrontation involving actors Johnny Depp and Meghan Markle this morning. The incident unfolded when Markle allegedly attempted to secure a spot performing alongside Depp and other celebrities at Andrea Bocelli’s upcoming 30th Anniversary concerts through bribery. Depp, set to make a special appearance at the concerts, reportedly reacted with fury upon learning of Markle’s alleged scheme.

Eyewitnesses described Depp’s immediate call for security, demanding Markle be apprehended and removed from the venue. “Johnny was absolutely livid the moment he found out Meghan was trying to weasel her way into the Bocelli concerts through bribery and manipulation,” recounted one concert organizer. “He started yelling, calling her all sorts of names, and insisted that security arrest her right then and there.”

Markle, who was reportedly at the venue scouting locations, fled as soon as Depp raised the alarm. Security personnel were dispatched to find her, but she managed to evade capture, and her current whereabouts are unknown.

The incident unfolded as Bocelli prepared to celebrate his 30th year as a beloved classical singer with a series of special anniversary concerts featuring a star-studded lineup. Alongside Depp, performers include Lady Gaga, Adele, Mick Jagger, Elton John, and classical crossover sensations. The concerts, set to take place worldwide, promise to be a musical highlight of the year.

Sources close to the situation indicated that Markle, eager to regain fame, saw the Bocelli concerts as a prime opportunity to boost her profile. Allegedly, she attempted to bribe concert organizers with a substantial sum for a performance slot. “Meghan is increasingly desperate to stay relevant and recapture her former fame,” said a source. “She thought by bribing her way into the Bocelli concerts, she could gain exposure to a global audience and potentially upstage other performers.”

Depp, who considers Bocelli a close friend, reportedly took Markle’s actions personally. “Johnny adores Andrea and considers him family,” explained the source. “The idea that someone would exploit that relationship for personal gain disgusted him.”

Representatives for Depp, Bocelli, and Markle have yet to comment publicly on the incident. Meanwhile, anticipation for the concerts remains high, despite the unexpected drama. Tickets have sold out quickly, with fans worldwide eager to witness the historic performances.

As for Markle, the fallout from the alleged bribery attempt remains uncertain. Depp’s strong response has cast a shadow over her efforts to return to the spotlight. For now, attention remains focused on Bocelli and the upcoming concerts, expected to be a musical extravaganza unlike any other.

Princess Anne has reportedly intervened to shield King Charles from what could have been an awkward situation involving Meghan Markle, the …

 Princess Anne has reportedly intervened to shield King Charles from what could have been an awkward situation involving Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex. According to insider sources, Meghan allegedly sent a letter to King Charles, imploring him to endorse the American Riviera Orchard brand. However, Princess Anne intercepted and subsequently burned the letter before it reached the king, sparking fresh controversy within the royal family.

The move by Princess Anne is seen as a protective measure to safeguard her brother from what she viewed as Meghan Markle’s attempt to exploit royal connections for personal gain. The letter supposedly contained emotional appeals and promises of mutual benefit, but Princess Anne’s decisive action underscored her commitment to upholding royal integrity.

Critics argue that Meghan’s alleged bid to involve King Charles in a commercial endorsement is another example of her relentless pursuit of fame and fortune, often disregarding royal protocol and dignity. The American Riviera Orchard brand, purportedly promoted by Meghan, is relatively unknown in luxury circles. Insiders suggest Meghan’s request aimed to elevate the brand’s visibility and credibility, a move deemed inappropriate and disrespectful by many within royal circles.

Royal expert Angela Levin criticized Meghan’s actions, noting they signify ongoing attempts to leverage royal connections for personal benefit. The royal family traditionally maintains a strict divide between their official duties and commercial interests, a principle Meghan’s actions seem to defy.

Known for her no-nonsense approach and dedication to royal duty, Princess Anne saw the letter as potentially compromising the monarchy’s integrity. By destroying it, she not only shielded the king from potential scandal but also reinforced the importance of protecting the royal family’s reputation.

Supporters of Princess Anne argue her actions were justified given the potential fallout of Meghan’s request. On social media, one supporter praised Princess Anne for protecting the monarchy, stating, “Princess Anne did the right thing. The royal family should not be used as a marketing tool. Kudos to her for safeguarding the monarchy.”

Meanwhile, Meghan’s supporters contend she is unfairly targeted and her intentions misunderstood. They argue Meghan’s efforts are aimed at securing a future for herself and her family, rather than undermining royal traditions.

From lucrative deals with streaming platforms to revealing interviews, the Sussexes have been accused of challenging the very institution they once represented. Meghan’s attempt to involve King Charles in a commercial venture is viewed by many as another chapter in this ongoing saga of conflict and controversy.

Eugenie Exposes Shocking Photos as Prince Harry & Meghan Markle Accused of Child Abuse

 Prince Harry and Meghan Markle find themselves embroiled in a scandal as real parents take legal action against them for alleged child abus…

 

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle find themselves embroiled in a scandal as real parents take legal action against them for alleged child abuse involving rented children. The controversy escalated when Princess Eugenie publicly shared shocking photos that purportedly depict the couple mistreating these children.

The lawsuit, filed by the real parents of the children involved, accuses Harry and Meghan of exploiting and mistreating minors they had allegedly rented for public appearances. The images posted by Eugenie have sparked outrage and intense scrutiny, leading to widespread condemnation on social media and beyond.

Details surrounding the alleged abuse remain unclear, but the lawsuit claims serious misconduct on the part of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. It is reported that the legal action aims to hold them accountable for their actions and seeks justice for the affected children and their families.

In response to the allegations, representatives for Harry and Meghan have yet to issue a formal statement. The royal couple has faced scrutiny in the past for their handling of public appearances and engagements involving minors.

The revelation of these shocking pictures by Princess Eugenie has not only tarnished the public image of Harry and Meghan but has also raised questions about their ethics and conduct. Authorities are expected to investigate the matter further as the case continues to unfold.

This scandal adds to the ongoing controversies surrounding the couple, who have sought to redefine their roles within and outside the royal family since stepping back from official duties. The outcome of the lawsuit and its implications for Harry and Meghan’s reputation and legal standing remain to be seen.

Recently, Meghan Markle expressed frustration about Kate Middleton frequently sharing fan photos and letters on social media. Meghan criticized this behavior as unnecessary self-promotion, suggesting that it prioritized showing off rather than genuine interaction with the public.

Kate Middleton, known for engaging with royal fans, often posts pictures and letters she receives to showcase public support. Meghan’s comments imply that she views these actions as excessive and believes they distract from more meaningful royal duties.

This criticism has intensified the ongoing tension between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family. Meghan and Harry have faced scrutiny for their unconventional approach to public life, contrasting with Kate and William’s more traditional methods of maintaining public relations.

The reaction to Meghan’s statement reflects broader issues of privacy and public engagement within the royal family, with some interpreting her comments as an unnecessary attack on Kate’s connection with royal supporters.