Author: quyen

 Recently, Meghan Markle’s comments about her “rotten time” in the UK stirred quite a bit of controversy. Royal expert Michael Cole was quic…

Recently, Meghan Markle’s comments about her “rotten time” in the UK stirred quite a bit of controversy. Royal expert Michael Cole was quick to push back against Meghan’s statements. He argued that Meghan was initially welcomed with open arms and celebrated as a breath of fresh air in the royal family. According to Cole, the couple had a positive reception back in 2017, and their wedding was met with a warm public response.

On the other hand, Newsweek’s Bataa Unar Sargon painted a different picture. Sargon suggested that Americans now view Harry and Meghan as a type of celebrity known more for their wealth and privilege than for any particular talent. Despite plans for new projects in 2024, many haven’t materialized yet. The couple’s brief visit to Nigeria in May, while notable, was largely overshadowed by their royal connections, which played a significant role in their fame and wealth.

Sargon also criticized Meghan for not appreciating her royal privileges. He pointed out that before meeting Harry, Meghan was relatively unknown, and her transition into royal life came with substantial public support and financial backing. The grandeur of their wedding, funded by taxpayers, seemed to contrast sharply with Meghan’s claims of dissatisfaction.

Critics argue that Meghan’s complaints about her time in the UK seem misplaced given the lavish lifestyle she enjoyed. From a multi-million dollar wedding to expensive jewelry and a taxpayer-funded residence, Meghan’s experience was far from a “rotten time,” according to her critics. They also questioned why, after receiving so much, Meghan is now critical of the royal family and their role in her life.

Some speculate that Meghan and Harry’s departure from the UK and their subsequent media ventures may have fueled their dissatisfaction. Despite lucrative contracts with Netflix and Spotify, these projects haven’t fully lived up to their potential. Critics argue that the couple’s public complaints and controversial content may be a way to stay relevant and maintain media attention.

In addition to their media ventures, Meghan’s criticism seems to overshadow the benefits she received while part of the royal family. Critics argue that Meghan’s ongoing complaints and criticisms of the royals, combined with her lucrative opportunities since leaving the UK, suggest a sense of entitlement and a lack of gratitude.

Prince Harry reveals he was not William’s best man and says it was a ‘bare-faced lie’

 Prince Harry told how he was forced to go along with the “bare-faced lie” that he was his brother William ’s best man, insisting: “Willy di…

Prince Harry told how he was forced to go along with the “bare-faced lie” that he was his brother William ’s best man, insisting: “Willy didn’t want me giving a best man’s speech”.

Revealing how his bitter rift with the heir to the throne hardened more than a decade ago, the Duke of Sussex said he was made to act out the role in order to spare interest into the lives of William’s two closest friends. Harry was officially classed as William’s best man at his wedding to Kate in 2011 and even travelled with the future King to Westminster Abbey in a Bentley.

But in an astonishing declaration he claimed it was all for show and his brother’s close friends James Meade and Thomas Van Straubenzee actually gave the traditional speech at the reception. Instead, Harry was demoted to act as a mere compere and introduce them. The revelation poses questions as to devastating length and breakdown to their once inseparable bond, described in searing and brutal detail in his new explosive memoir.

Released this week by mistake ahead of its official global launch next Tuesday, booksellers in Spain gave the world its first glimpse at ‘Spare’. A reference to the phrase “heir and a spare” uttered by his father King Charles to his late mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, when he was born, it has already become a global bestseller and sent shockwaves around the royal family.

Harry’s brutal takedowns of members of his family including his father, “wicked stepmother” Camilla and sister-in-law Kate and once beloved brother William have sent shockwaves through the royal family. The Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace households have refused to engage in a “tit-for-tat” battle of words with Harry with one insider claiming the royals were “beyond weary” of the Duke’s attacks.

In further petty claims Harry told how Prince William was tipsy on rum hours before his wedding to Kate in 2011. The Duke says his older brother went down to greet people camping out on the Mall by Buckingham Palace, ahead of the ceremony while intoxicated, having been drinking to calm his nerves.

Harry said to him: “You smell of alcohol” and offered him some mint sweets as he lowered the windows of the car, describing the smell of “the aftermath of last night’s rum” on his “tipsy” brother’s breath. Bitter and acrimonious allegations spill from the 557 pages seen in full for the first time on Thursday as The Mirror got hold of a copy from a bookshop in southern Spain.

Their squabbling included his own wedding; seven years later, when the brothers rowed over whether Harry should get married with a beard. “At one point he actually ordered me, as the Heir speaking to the Spare, to shave,” he wrote – even though the late Queen had given his facial hair the seal of royal approval. Emphasising the competitive nature of their relationship, Harry adds: “He hated the idea of me enjoying a perk that he’d been denied”.

In the same chapter, Harry reveals his wife Meghan and the Princess of Wales were at loggerheads from the “early days”, laying the blame on a misunderstanding over Kate thinking Meghan wanted her “fashion contacts” when in fact she had her own. Harry claims William and Kate confessed that they were huge fans of Suits, the legal drama in which Meghan played paralegal Rachel Zane, with William exclaiming “f*** off!” when he revealed he was dating Meghan.

In another extract of the book Harry recalls an “awkward moment” between his wife, Meghan Markle, and his sister-in-law, Kate. The uncomfortable encounter allegedly went down before the Sussexes’ and the Waleses’ Royal Foundation Forum appearance in 2018, when Harry’s new wife asked to borrow Kate’s lip gloss when she forgot hers.

Harry said: “Kate, taken aback, went into her handbag and reluctantly pulled out a small tube,” Harry wrote. “Meg squeezed some onto her finger and applied it to her lips. Kate grimaced.” Harry goes further to lay into his brother and Kate, suggesting that staff took sides in the run-up to Megxit. “Team Cambridges versus Team Sussex.

Rivalry, jealousy, competing agendas – it all poisoned the atmosphere,” he writes. In one of the more bizarre of Harry’s claims, he tells how he believed that Princess Diana had faked her death to escape the press. The Duke of Sussex was just 12 when his mother died in a tragic car crash in a Paris tunnel. In “Spare,” he admits that he has spent the subsequent decades trying to find out what really happened on that fateful night.

Following the tragedy the young princes were at Balmoral Castle in Scotland, staying with their grandparents, Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, Harry told: “With nothing to do but roam the castle and talk to myself, a suspicion took hold, which then became a firm belief. This was all a trick.”

Detailing the further breakdown of his relationship with his brother, Harry claims William was constantly “jealous” of him for being allowed certain privileges over him, such as growing a beard at his wedding and setting up the successful Invictus Games sporting event around the world for injured service personnel.

“He appeared supremely irritated,” the former military pilot writes in his book, out Jan. 10, claiming that William complained it would drain funds from their foundation. Harry, 38, called his sibling’s issue “absurd” and explained that the financing would come from the Endeavor Fund, a branch he “created specifically for the rehabilitation of veterans,” as well as donors. Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace both declined to comment on any of the allegations.

King Charles Grants Anne an Extraordinary Role, Excludes Prince Harry and Prince Andrew from New Monarchy

According to reliable sources, King Charles has made a decision that will completely transform the dynamics within the monarchy. In light of…

According to reliable sources, King Charles has made a decision that will completely transform the dynamics within the monarchy. In light of the Andrew scandal and Harry’s continued disloyalty, the hardworking Princess Anne, Charles’ younger sister, is finally receiving the recognition and responsibilities that her exemplary service truly deserves.

At the age of 72, Princess Anne’s work ethic puts individuals half her age to shame. As reported by Kinsey Scoffield, a distinguished American royal expert, Princess Anne’s lifetime of unbelievable service has earned her praise and the suggestion that she should be granted an elevated role and title, such as Deputy Monarch or Queen’s Consort.

Undoubtedly, such titles would suit Princess Anne, who is known for her modesty and aversion to fanfare. However, there is no doubt that she will assume special responsibilities and authority, surpassing the dreams of the Sussexes.

My sources within the palace reveal that Charles is designating Princess Anne as the unofficial leader and ultimate authority over all remaining royal patronages and institutions. In essence, she will act as a patronage czar, overseeing the streamlining and reformation of these organizations from top to bottom. Her primary objectives will be to ensure high standards of ethics, efficiency, and genuine public service in line with the requirements of the modern era. Institutions that have previously served as havens for corrupt practices, vanity projects, or dodgy dealings will be reevaluated and potentially dismantled. Princess Anne’s appointment signals a departure from the days when individuals like Prince Andrew and Meghan were associated with such questionable organizations.In fact, it is rumored that both Prince Andrew and Prince Harry could face potential criminal investigations as a result of Princess Anne’s audits of their former ventures. Misuse of funds, fraud, tax evasion, and other shady dealings are said to have been uncovered, and every ill-gotten penny will be subjected to scrutiny and accountability. Harry, in particular, is reportedly distraught over the imminent loss of control over his beloved Invictus Games, which has been one of the few positive legacies from his military career. Sources indicate that he is threatening legal action and smear campaigns unless he retains control and continues to profit from the inspirational sporting event for wounded veterans. However, my sources assure me that Charles’ decree is unwavering, and Harry will have to comply or face the consequences.

Putting the scandalous revelations aside, I, for one, am elated that Princess Anne, a dedicated public servant, is finally receiving the appreciation and empowerment she deserves under the new monarch. Far too often, her substantial and selfless contributions to the Crown have been overlooked. While Charles spent his early adulthood navigating his relationship with Camilla and falling short as a father, Princess Anne was tirelessly touring Britain’s industrial estates and rural communities. She established dignified connections with working-class individuals, likely preventing more severe calls for republicanism during those times. While Andrew was engaging in questionable activities and Harry was living a life of luxury, Princess Anne was advocating for the environment, education, healthcare, and women’s empowerment long before these causes became trendy.

It is high time that the reins of the monarchy were handed over to responsible adults, moving away from the childish and fame-driven antics of individuals like Harry and Meghan. King Charles’ firm and reformist stance is crucial in restoring public faith in the modern monarchy. It is a necessary step in eliminating the tabloid scandals that have tarnished the image of the royal family. No exceptions should be made, and a rebuilding process based on ethical foundations and trust must commence. With Princess Anne as the cynicism-proof, no-nonsense general leading the charge, the monarchy is poised for a ruthless yet fair pruning of its ranks. Institutions that fail to serve the people and exhibit questionable practices will be discarded without ceremony.

While we eagerly anticipate the dismantling of the dubious organizations associated with Andrew and Meghan, there are whispers that both of them may face criminal investigations for financial misconduct, fraud, and tax evasion. Princess Anne’s audits have reportedly unearthed evidence of their questionable dealings. As the Sussex saga continues to unfold, only time will reveal what lies ahead.

Hannah Whittingham has sparked a major controversy with her explosive claims about Archie Harrison’s nursery, leaving Meghan Markle visibl…

Hannah Whittingham has sparked a major controversy with her explosive claims about Archie Harrison’s nursery, leaving Meghan Markle visibly shaken. The unexpected revelations involving Prince Harry, Meghan, and their baby have captivated the world, with new details emerging daily. Even royal enthusiasts are struggling to keep up with Meghan Sussex’s latest disclosures.

 

The drama began when Hannah Whittingham, known for her role in the acclaimed series *Ted Lasso*, made a startling revelation during a candid discussion. Contrary to Meghan and Harry’s statements about Archie being cared for in their nursery, as portrayed in their high-profile interview with Oprah Winfrey, Whittingham claimed that Frogmore Cottage, the Sussexes’ former residence, was responsible for looking after the young royal.

This revelation has shocked the royal community, contradicting the carefully crafted image Meghan and Harry have presented to the public. Their narrative about their child’s care, including claims about withheld security measures and a royal title, is now under intense scrutiny.

 

Reports indicate that Meghan Markle was profoundly unsettled by Whittingham’s confession. Eyewitnesses observed that Meghan appeared visibly disturbed, with some noting that her pants seemed wet—an involuntary response to the startling news. A close source mentioned that Meghan was deeply upset upon learning that Archie’s living situation had been exposed, reacting as though she was losing her footing. 

The Duchess of Sussex’s emotional distress underscores the serious implications of these revelations and their potential impact on the Sussex family’s public image. Whittingham’s disclosure suggests that, despite the seemingly nurturing environment presented in the Oprah interview, Meghan orchestrated a façade to create a particular image.

According to Whittingham, Archie was not actually residing in the nursery as portrayed. Instead, staff at Frogmore Cottage were handling his care away from the public eye, adding complexity to the Sussexes’ carefully curated narrative. This has led to significant questions about the accuracy of the Sussexes’ statements and whether they manipulated their story to gain public sympathy.

The revelations have sparked intense reactions both within the royal family and society. Some are outraged by what appears to be deception, while others are concerned about Archie’s well-being. The implications extend beyond the royal family, casting doubt on the honesty of Meghan and Harry’s public statements and their interactions with the media.

As the fallout from Whittingham’s revelations continues, there is growing pressure for a thorough investigation into any discrepancies between their Oprah interview and the new information. The public is demanding transparency and accountability from Meghan and Harry as they face mounting scrutiny. This situation threatens to further tarnish their reputation on the global stage.

Lady Sarah Cautions Meghan Markle Against Attempting to Attend Her 30th Anniversary Party

  British tabloids are buzzing once again, and this time, the drama revolves around Meghan Markle and a seemingly simple wedding anniversary…

 

British tabloids are buzzing once again, and this time, the drama revolves around Meghan Markle and a seemingly simple wedding anniversary celebration. Lady Sarah Chatto, the niece of Queen Elizabeth II and a notably private member of the extended royal family, is reportedly hosting an intimate party to mark 30 years of marriage to artist Daniel Chatto. However, rumors suggest that Meghan might be angling for an invitation, and this is reportedly causing unease for Lady Sarah.

According to an unnamed source close to Lady Sarah, Meghan has a history of inserting herself into events where she may not be entirely welcome. The source claims that Lady Sarah, who is known for her preference for low-key affairs, specifically requested a private gathering with close friends and family. Meghan, on the other hand, is said to favor grand gestures and public appearances, leading to concerns that she might attempt to gatecrash the celebration.

This situation is not the first instance of Meghan’s social maneuvering raising eyebrows. Royal watchers have observed a pattern where Meghan seems to seek ways to elevate her status within the royal family. From the extravagant wedding ceremony that broke with tradition to the controversial tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey, Meghan’s actions have often been interpreted as efforts to grab headlines and assert control over the narrative.

Adding to the intrigue is the reported tension between Meghan and Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge. Although the nature of their relationship is often speculated upon, persistent reports of a rift have surfaced over the years. With Kate expected to attend Lady Sarah’s party, some royal insiders believe Meghan might view the event as an opportunity to attract attention, potentially creating an uncomfortable situation for everyone involved.

These reports prompt intriguing questions about the dynamics within the royal family. How do less prominent members navigate their relationships with key figures? Does Meghan genuinely struggle with the concept of hierarchy, or is she simply striving to carve out her own place within the royal institution?

Ultimately, only those directly involved know the full story. Yet, the ongoing rumors surrounding Meghan Markle continue to stir public curiosity about her intentions and motivations.

Prince Harry immediately returned to England to confront King Charles after he stripped Meghan of her final royal title: “My wife has been completely stripped of her assets.”

Prince Harry reportedly ‘infuriated’ after his father Charles declined financial support to Meghan Markle

Prince Harry got angry when his father King Charles declined financial support to Meghan Markle, according to a new book.

A massive blow came from then-Prince Charles, who told Harry that he could not afford to pay Meghan as a member of the royal family as he was supporting Camilla.

Charles told his younger son that he could not afford to pay Meghan as a member of the royal family since he was already supporting Camilla and William’s expanding brood, according to Jobson’s book reported by the Daily Mail.

Robert Jobson, in his book ‘Our King’, reportedly claims that Harry was “infuriated” when his father Charles declined to nominate Meghan for the royal household’s payroll.

One of the early disagreements between father and son was sparked by the “bombshell.” Harry’s calls were no longer answered by Charles after his son yelled at him and demanded money repeatedly, according to an excerpt from Jobson’s book. “When the Queen asked Charles why he hadn’t given in, he told her that he wasn’t a bank” the author wrote.

Jobson, who previously authored books on Princess Diana and former bodyguard Ken Wharfe, stated that “this infuriated Harry.”

Nanny Tiggy’s Deleted Proof Exposes Meghan’s Past: Prince Harry Isolated in the US

 

In a shocking revelation, Nanny Tiggy has come forward to claim that she sent Prince Harry evidence exposing Meghan Markle’s questionable past before their wedding.

However, the Duchess allegedly deleted the proof, leaving Harry unaware of the information.

This revelation adds to the growing concerns surrounding Prince Harry’s isolation from his British friends and trusted advisors since moving to the United States.

During a discussion on Palace Confidential, Richard Eden, the Daily Mail’s diary editor, along with Sarah Vine, a Daily Mail columnist, and Rebecca English, the Daily Mail’s royal editor, delved into the fallout between Prince Harry and his beloved childhood nanny, Tiggy.

According to Vine, Harry has distanced himself from his old friends and advisors, including people like Tiggy Legg-Burke, who used to play a crucial role in supporting him.

“I hear that he doesn’t talk to any of his old friends, he doesn’t listen to any of his old advisors,” Vine explained.

Tiggy Legg-Burke, who had previously been the nanny for both Prince William and Prince Harry, later became a personal assistant to Prince Charles.

She maintained a close relationship with the royal family well into their adulthood.

However, Harry’s relationship with Tiggy deteriorated due to Meghan’s influence, betraying the woman who had been like a second mother to him.

Interestingly, reports suggest that Prince Harry had introduced Meghan Markle to Tiggy Legg-Burke, eager to have his bride-to-be meet the person who had cared for him after the tragic death of Princess Diana.

Despite their differences, the two women reportedly got along famously.

A source revealed, “She’s a very significant person in Harry’s life, almost like a mother figure as she looked after Harry when Princess Diana died.”

It is believed that Harry and Meghan met Tiggy after their visit to Cardiff in January 2018, four months prior to their wedding.

However, in April, Tiggy texted Harry with alarming information about Meghan’s past, stating that MI5 was investigating her.

Unfortunately, Tiggy never received a response, leading her to wonder if Meghan had deleted the message and Harry was unaware of its contents.

Since then, they have lost contact with each other, leaving Tiggy unable to share her concerns and opinions with Harry.

The significance of Tiggy’s role in Harry’s life cannot be understated.

She was the one person who would genuinely tell him the truth, even if it meant questioning his decisions.

This recent revelation raises questions about Meghan’s past and the extent to which Harry was aware of it before their marriage.

In a separate note, criticisms have been directed towards Meghan Markle, with some claiming that she was nothing more than a failed social media influencer who managed to marry a prince out of desperation.

These critics argue that Meghan’s focus was on gaining fame and expensive clothing, rather than embracing the privileges and responsibilities that come with being a member of the royal family.

They highlight her lack of interest in the rich art collection housed in the royal residences, as well as her tendency to imitate others in terms of fashion and home decor.

The controversy surrounding Meghan’s decorating choices, such as the Frogmore Cottage, has also drawn attention.

Critics point out that her style seems to follow popular trends rather than being a reflection of her own personality.

Furthermore, they argue that her preference for white and black, both devoid of color, is ironic considering her mixed-race background.

In conclusion, Nanny Tiggy’s claim of deleted proof exposing Meghan’s past adds another dimension to the ongoing scrutiny of Prince Harry’s isolation and Meghan’s actions.

King Charles’ Strategic Move: Duchess Sophie’s Rise Halts Meghan Markle’s UK Comeback

  In a period marked by significant upheavals within the British monarchy, one member has quietly ascended to a prominent role amidst shifti…

 

In a period marked by significant upheavals within the British monarchy, one member has quietly ascended to a prominent role amidst shifting dynamics and challenges. The spotlight has increasingly turned to Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh.

Amid the passing of Queen Elizabeth and the departure of the Sussexes for a new life in the United States, Sophie has solidified her position within the royal family, earning recognition as a diligent and devoted member.

Known affectionately as the late Queen’s favored royal, Sophie has taken on an increasingly visible role. She has been seen attending prestigious events such as state banquets and Trooping the Colour alongside Queen Camilla.

Sophie’s elevation within the royal hierarchy became particularly evident following Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s decision to step back from royal duties. Their departure left a notable gap, which Sophie has filled as one of the few working royals under the age of 70, alongside Prince Charles and Princess Camilla.

 

Recently, Sophie was prominently seated next to Emperor Narito at a state banquet for the Japanese royals at Buckingham Palace. This placement underscores her growing influence and the trust she commands from King Charles. Despite not being in regular contact with Meghan these days, Sophie shares similar passions for causes such as ending gender-based violence and promoting girls’ education. This reflects their shared commitment to humanitarian issues. 

Sophie’s contributions as a working royal have taken her across the globe, from Kosovo to South Sudan and Iraq, where she has engaged directly with communities affected by gender-based violence. Her visit to Sierra Leone in 2020 highlighted her advocacy for women’s rights and her role in promoting peace-building efforts. This showcases the impactful work that members of the royal family can achieve on the ground.

Royal expert Richard Fitz Williams describes Sophie as cheerful, dedicated, and unassuming—an achiever who diligently supports numerous charitable organizations without seeking public acclaim. In contrast to the perceived self-focus of Meghan, Sophie’s approach is characterized by a steadfast commitment to service, akin to that of Princess Anne, focusing on substantive contributions rather than personal recognition.

Despite their differences in temperament and approach, Sophie’s role within the royal family has been marked by respect and trust, particularly from King Charles, who values her reliability and dedication. Reports suggest that Sophie was once considered by the late Queen as a potential mentor for Meghan upon her entry into the royal family, although Meghan ultimately chose to rely on her husband, Prince Harry, for support.

Sophie, formerly known as the Countess of Wessex, saw her status within the royal household change significantly when her husband, Prince Edward, was bestowed the title of Duke of Edinburgh. This elevation in rank reflects not only her personal standing but also a shift in protocol within the family dynamic, particularly in relation to her interactions with other members.

A close friend of the couple noted Sophie’s relief at no longer needing to defer to someone who has distanced themselves from royal duties and publicly criticized the institution that she continues to diligently support. Married to Prince Edward since 1999, Sophie has played a pivotal role in the family’s public engagements and charitable endeavors, alongside raising their two children, Lady Louise Windsor and James, Viscount Severn.

As the monarchy navigates ongoing transitions and challenges, Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh, stands as a testament to dedication, resilience, and steadfast service within the firm. Her journey from a supportive confidant of the late Queen to a respected figure in her own right underscores her enduring commitment to the royal family and its enduring legacy.

Meghan revealed she became wealthy quickly through inheriting a substantial fortune from her biological mother, Doria, saying, “I didn’t need royal money.”

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has been a topic of interest and controversy since her marriage to Prince Harry. One of the most discussed topics surrounding Meghan is her finances. There have been conflicting reports about her net worth, her income, and her lifestyle.

Meghan Markle’s Net Worth

One of the most common questions people have about Meghan Markle is how much money she has. According to Celebrity Net Worth, Meghan Markle’s net worth is estimated to be $60 million. This figure includes the money she made from her acting career, as well as the money she inherited from her father’s estate. However, it’s important to note that this estimate is just that – an estimate. There are many factors that could affect Meghan’s actual net worth, including her spending habits, her investments, and her future earnings.

Meghan Markle’s Income

In addition to her net worth, people are also curious about Meghan Markle’s income. Since marrying Prince Harry, Meghan has not been allowed to work in the traditional sense, as she is a member of the royal family. However, Meghan and Harry have announced that they will be stepping back from their royal duties and becoming financially independent. This means that Meghan will likely be able to work and earn money outside of her royal obligations.

It’s unclear what type of work Meghan will pursue, but she has hinted at her interest in acting and producing. She has also been involved in philanthropic work and could potentially start her own charity or nonprofit organization. Whatever she decides to do, it’s safe to assume that she will be able to earn a substantial income given her previous success in the entertainment industry.

Meghan Markle’s Lifestyle

Another factor that affects Meghan Markle’s finances is her lifestyle. Many people have criticized Meghan for being too extravagant and spending too much money. However, it’s important to remember that Meghan’s lifestyle is not entirely her own choice. As a member of the royal family, Meghan is expected to maintain a certain level of status and luxury. This includes expensive clothing, jewelry, and travel accommodations.

That being said, Meghan has been criticized for some of her spending habits. For example, she reportedly spent over $500,000 on her baby shower, which many people viewed as excessive. However, it’s important to note that much of this money was spent on security and other necessary expenses.

Meghan already had a substantial net worth before marrying Prince Harry, but her royal duties and lifestyle likely come with many expenses. However, with her recent decision to step back from her royal obligations and become financially independent, Meghan will likely have the opportunity to earn a substantial income and take control of her own finances. Only time will tell how Meghan’s finances will evolve, but it’s safe to say that she will always have a certain level of wealth and status, regardless of her future endeavors.

Meghan and Harry’s Misplaced Rights: A Reality Check from King Charles

 

In the latest development surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the couple finds themselves at odds with the royal family over their perceived entitlement.

It appears that they are struggling to comprehend why they cannot adhere to the same rules as other members of the monarchy.

However, it is time for a reality check as King Charles steps in to address their misguided expectations.

Royal commentator Neil Sean sheds light on Meghan and Harry’s confusion by drawing attention to Sarah, the Duchess of York.

The couple seems perplexed as to why Fergie can freely engage in television appearances, book sales, potential commercials, and even claim the title of Duchess of York under royal patronage.

Meghan’s outrage at Fergie’s media ventures, all while being associated with the royal brand, is palpable.

It is evident that Meghan and Harry fail to grasp the distinct regulations that apply to different members of the royal family.

Neil Sean breaks it down for them, emphasizing that Fergie is not actively trying to undermine the monarchy.

This stark contrast is crucial for Meghan and Harry to comprehend.

Furthermore, Prince Harry’s longing for his homeland, as expressed in their 2022 Netflix series, raises eyebrows.

Michael Cole points out the absurdity of Harry’s statement, suggesting that it is an unusual way of expressing himself.

Cole does not shy away from stating that Meghan and Harry have an agenda, one that is unhelpful and hurtful to the family.

Harry’s nostalgic memories of the British lifestyle seem hollow when juxtaposed with their relentless attacks on the royal institution.

Let us not forget the absence of fun and family reunions since 2018, as Meghan and Harry conveniently skipped attending Christmas at Sandringham while pursuing media projects and charity work in the United States.

It is ironic that they have missed out on cherished family gatherings while deliberately distancing themselves from the royal family.

Their involvement in charity work and media ventures is unsurprising, as it aligns with their brand.

From Netflix documentaries to Meghan’s now-canceled podcast, they are building a media empire while maintaining connections to the royal family, all under the guise of raising their children in Hollywood.

It is evident that Meghan and Harry do not seek a quiet family life.

Their agenda appears to be driven by an insatiable desire for attention and a relentless pursuit of their vision of justice against the royal family.

In short, they are in dire need of a reality check.

King Charles’ right-hand must guide them away from misguided entitlement and challenge their crude expectations.

It is time for them to grasp their position and cease playing the victim.

The royal family does not buy into their narrative, and it is high time for Meghan and Harry to wake up.

What are your thoughts on this news?

We invite you to share your opinions in the comments section below.

Stay tuned for more news and in-depth analysis.