“THIS IS AUTHORITARIANISM — FULL STOP.”  Patrick Christys UNLEASHES Fury at 𝘒𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 After Labour AXES Elections in Power Grab That Sparks National Outrage  The explosive on-air attack has lit up social media, with critics warning democracy is being quietly dismantled — and supporters scrambling to defend the decision. Britain is divided… and the backlash is only growing.

Patrick Christys: Leftie HUMILIATED After Audience Member EXPOSES the Truth Behind Starmer’s ‘Dictator-Style’ Election Delays

Let’s stop pretending this is boring admin.

Let’s stop pretending this is just “parish councils” or “tidying up local government.”
And for heaven’s sake, let’s stop pretending that cancelling elections for nearly 10 million people is somehow compatible with a healthy democracy.

Because when you strip away the excuses, the jargon, and the smug Westminster complacency, what we saw on that panel was something far more revealing:
a left-wing commentator caught flat-footed, exposed by an ordinary voter who understands democracy better than the people paid to lecture us about it.

“I Haven’t Been Able to Vote — Twice.”

That should have ended the argument.

An audience member — calm, articulate, and visibly fed up — explained that she lives on the Hampshire–West Sussex border and has now missed two chances to vote because elections keep getting kicked down the road.

Twice.

Not because of war.
Not because of a pandemic.
Not because the ballot boxes caught fire.

But because Labour decided it would be inconvenient to ask the public what they think.

And how did our leftie pundit respond?

By sneering.
By minimising.
By effectively saying: What’s the big deal?

That, right there, is the modern Left in a nutshell.

Seven Years in Power — No Voters Required

Let’s be absolutely clear about what’s happening.

Labour, with the quiet agreement of the Conservatives, is delaying local and mayoral elections across 63 councils. If these delays are extended again — and many expect they will be — some councillors will sit in office for seven years without facing voters.

Seven years.

That’s longer than most parliaments in functioning democracies.

And yet, when people dare to point out that this looks suspiciously authoritarian, we’re told to calm down. To stop being dramatic. To trust the process.

Funny, isn’t it?

Because if Nigel Farage or Reform UK had cancelled elections for 10 million people, the BBC would be running wall-to-wall coverage on the “collapse of democracy,” and every left-wing activist within a 50-mile radius would be screaming “fascism” into a megaphone.

But this time?

Oh, it’s Labour.
Sir 𝘒𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳.
Nice suit. Red rosette. Move along.

“That’s Not Fascism — That’s Restructuring”

One of the most jaw-dropping moments came when the left-wing panellist dismissed comparisons to authoritarianism as “absurd,” scoffing at the idea that delaying local elections could possibly matter.

Parish councils, he implied, are barely worth worrying about.

Tell that to the people who rely on them for social care decisions.
Tell that to the communities whose roads, housing, and services are controlled locally.
Tell that to the parish councillor in the audience — a volunteer — who stood up and explained how his unpaid public service has affected his family and his children.

And still, the response was condescension.

This is not ignorance.
This is contempt.

Democracy Only When It’s Convenient

Here’s the problem Labour doesn’t want to talk about:
democracy is messy — and they’re losing control of it.

Reform is surging.
Trust in Labour and the Conservatives is collapsing.
Voters are angry, cynical, and increasingly unwilling to play along.

So what do you do if you’re terrified of the verdict?

You delay it.

You dress it up as “reorganisation.”
You claim it’s about efficiency.
You say the public wouldn’t understand the complexities anyway.

And then you ask the very councillors who benefit from staying in power longer whether they fancy… staying in power longer.

Unsurprisingly, many say yes.

That’s not reform.
That’s self-preservation.

Even the Electoral Commission Isn’t Buying It

And before anyone accuses me of exaggeration, let’s remember this:
the Electoral Commission itself has criticised these delays, arguing that the justifications are weak and that elections should go ahead.

But who cares what the independent watchdog says, right?

After all, this government already feels comfortable:

Scrapping jury trials

Policing online speech

Arresting people for social media posts

Rewriting rules to suit itself

So why not quietly suspend a few elections while you’re at it?

“If We Can Land a Man on the Moon…”

One audience member made a point so devastatingly simple that it cut through every excuse.

If Britain could organise elections during the Second World War — with half a million dead, cities in ruins, and troops scattered across the globe — why can’t we manage one now?

The answer, of course, is obvious.

We can.

They just don’t want to.

This Is About Fear

Let’s stop dancing around it.

Labour is scared.

Scared of Reform.
Scared of voters.
Scared of what happens when people finally get their say.

And the most insulting part of all?
They think you’re too stupid to notice.

They think if they dismiss local councils as irrelevant, democracy itself will shrink with it.

It won’t.

Because democracy doesn’t belong to politicians.
It belongs to people like that woman in the audience — the one who hasn’t voted, not once, but twice.

History Is Watching

You don’t need tanks in the streets to slide into authoritarianism.
Sometimes all it takes is a government that decides elections are… inconvenient.

Liberty is not a “nice to have.”
It is the foundation.

And any party — Labour included — that treats the right to vote as optional is playing a dangerous game.

They might delay the reckoning

But they can’t cancel it forever

ROYAL REVEAL  What William & Kate Really Meant With Their 2025 Christmas Card  This year’s card isn’t just festive — it’s meaningful. Discover what the imagery, setting, and message say about the year they’ve had and hopes for the next.

A royal commentator has weighed in on the meaning behind Prince William and Kate, Princess of Wales’ 2025 Christmas card.

The adorable photo features the Prince and Princess of Wales and their three kids, Prince George, 12, Princess Charlotte, 10, and Prince Louis, seven. In the picture, Charlotte cuddles into her dad while Louis is sat between William’s legs. George is seen cuddled into his mum, Kate.

You can have a look at it here. Alongside the photo, a message read: “Wishing everyone a very Happy Christmas.”

Now, a royal expert has suggested there may be a hidden message behind the cute family snap.

The Wales family released their 2025 Christmas card earlier this week (Credit: Cover Images)

William and Kate’s Christmas card unpacked

Captured by photographer Josh Shinner in Norfolk in April of this year, the photo shows the family-of-five sitting on the grass in a field of daffodils. It appears to have been taken on a sunny day.

Perhaps not a very stereotypically ‘Christmassy’ image, but royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams claimed this would have been a deliberate decision.

A daffodil covered backdrop in the countryside has the feel of healing and rebirth.

“A royal card is invariably a photograph of senders,” he told the Daily Mail. “If they looked kitted for harsh weather, it might be viewed as symbolic, especially if the royal family has had a tough year.”

He described the festive photo as “an important public relations statement”, adding that the royal family put a lot of thought into creating their Christmas cards, to ensure that they send a positive message.

To this end, the expert claimed that the Waleses’ springtime snap is actually a “perfect example of a Christmas card,” using “rural settings to convey charm and good tidings”.

“A daffodil covered backdrop in the countryside has the feel of healing and rebirth which is an integral part of the festive season,” he explained. “Especially when Catherine, who is promoting the merits of outdoor life to children, is in remission from cancer.”

Queen Camilla and King Charles have also shared their own Christmas card (Credit: Andrew Bartlett/Cover Images)

King Charles and Queen Camilla’s Christmas card

The expert’s observations can also be applied to King Charles and Queen Camilla’s 2025 Christmas card.

The king and queen likewise chose to stay away from seasonal stereotypes, opting for a photo of them both taken in April during their visit to Rome. In the background, we can see the stunning floral gardens of the Villa Wolkonsky, the British ambassador’s residence.

Meanwhile, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle shared a family photo on Friday ahead of the holiday season.

Read more: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle rename Archewell Foundation in exciting ‘next chapter’

The photo shows Harry, 41, Meghan, 44, Archie, six, and Lilibet, four, stood on a bridge over a stream of water.

Harry is seen standing tall and looking down, as Archie has his arms wrapped around his dad’s waist. Meanwhile, Meghan is bent down to her daughter’s height as Lilibet holds onto her mum’s hands.

You can see it here.

Which photo is your favourite?

Jo Silvagni ‘On the Brink of Collapse’ as TV Career Hangs in the Balance After Son’s Horrific Crime Conviction

The cameras once captured Jo Silvagni as polished, confident, and in control — a familiar face associated with trust and everyday normalcy through her television work with Chemist Warehouse.

Now, those same cameras are catching something very different.

Observers say Silvagni looks drained, visibly shaken, and emotionally overwhelmed as her professional future teeters following her son’s conviction for a horrific crime — a development that has sent shockwaves through the public and placed her private life under unforgiving scrutiny.

A Mother at the Center of a Public Storm

According to people close to the situation, Silvagni is “on the brink of collapse,” struggling to cope with the emotional fallout while facing intense pressure over her television career.

What makes the situation particularly painful, insiders say, is the collision of two identities she can no longer keep separate: a mother grappling with unimaginable personal devastation, and a public figure suddenly judged through that lens.

“She’s not just exhausted,” one insider said. “She’s shattered.”

From Trusted TV Figure to Uncertain Future

For years, Silvagni’s television presence was built on relatability and reassurance — qualities brands value deeply.

That foundation is now under strain.

Following her son’s conviction, questions have emerged about whether her association with Chemist Warehouse can continue, not because of anything she personally did, but because of the public attention now surrounding her family.

Industry observers note that brand partnerships are often risk-averse, especially when controversy — even indirect — enters the picture.

‘Worse Than Anyone Imagined’

Behind closed doors, those close to Silvagni describe her current state as far more severe than what the public has seen.

“She’s barely functioning,” one source said. “The emotional toll is enormous. It’s worse than anyone imagined.”

Friends say she has been grappling with guilt, grief, shock, and the instinctive pain of a parent confronting the reality of their child’s actions — all while knowing millions are watching her reaction.

The Weight of Public Judgment

While Silvagni has not spoken publicly in detail, public reaction has been swift and divided.

Some express sympathy, emphasizing that a parent is not responsible for the crimes of an adult child.

Others, however, have questioned whether her continued presence on television is appropriate — a debate that has intensified scrutiny of her every appearance.

Media analysts say this is a familiar but brutal pattern: when personal tragedy becomes public spectacle, nuance is often the first casualty.

A Career Hanging by a Thread

Silvagni’s future with Chemist Warehouse remains uncertain.

There has been no definitive public announcement regarding her status, but insiders say discussions are ongoing and tense.

“This isn’t about contracts on paper,” one industry source explained. “It’s about perception, timing, and public sentiment.”

In modern media, silence can be as telling as action — and the silence surrounding Silvagni’s role has only fueled speculation.

The Human Cost Behind the Headlines

Lost in the debate about branding and careers, supporters argue, is the human cost.

Silvagni is a mother confronting a nightmare no parent prepares for.

Psychologists note that parents of convicted children often experience a complex mix of emotions: love, horror, shame, loyalty, and grief — all without a clear path forward.

Doing so under national scrutiny magnifies that pain exponentially.

Why This Story Has Struck a Nerve

The public reaction to Silvagni’s situation reveals a deeper societal tension: how much grace should be afforded to those adjacent to crime?

Her case has reignited conversations about guilt by association, especially for women in the public eye, who are often judged more harshly for family scandals.

Supporters argue that empathy is being lost in the rush to judge.

No Easy Answers

There are no clean narratives here.

Silvagni did not commit the crime.
She cannot undo it.
And she cannot escape its consequences.

What remains unclear is whether the public — and the industry — will allow space for separation between personal tragedy and professional identity.

A Silence That Speaks Volumes

So far, Silvagni has largely remained out of the spotlight, avoiding public statements beyond what is necessary.

Those close to her say that silence is not avoidance — it is survival.

“She’s trying to hold herself together,” one source said. “Every day is a battle.”

What Happens Next

As the fallout continues, decisions about Silvagni’s television future are expected in the coming weeks.

Whether she steps away voluntarily, is sidelined quietly, or returns after a period of absence remains unknown.

What is clear is that her life — both public and private — has been irrevocably altered.

Final Takeaway

Jo Silvagni’s story is not just about television contracts or public image.

It is about the devastating intersection of motherhood, crime, and relentless public judgment.

As one insider put it quietly:
“She didn’t lose control of her career overnight. She lost the life she recognized.”

And for now, the cameras may still be watching —
but behind them is a woman trying simply to survive the worst chapter of her life.

“WEDDING DATE SET” Wedding ring a testament to Helen Skelton’s declaration of love for Gethin Jones – Fans go wild: ‘Love is back in her life!’.

“Sh0ck romance twist: Wedding ring fuels engagement rumours as Helen Skelton declares her ‘love’ for Gethin Jones – Fans go wild: ‘Love is back in her life

Helen Skelton has sparked a wave of support and admiration after declaring her “love and respect” for fellow presenter Gethin Jones, following their gruelling 24-hour “Wheely Big Challenge” for Comic Relief — a campaign that helped raise millions for those in need.

Helen and Gethin raised over one million pounds for charity

The two BBC Morning Live stars were instrumental in the success of Comic Relief’s 40th anniversary fundraiser, which closed with a remarkable £34 million raised — announced at the end of the live BBC telethon on Friday, March 21.

Helen Skelton and Gethin Jones co-host Morning Live

Hosted at Salford’s MediaCity, Red Nose Day featured iconic sketches from BBC favourites like Strictly Come Dancing, Gladiators, and Beyond Paradise. Leading the charge were high-profile presenters including Joel Dommett, Rylan Clark, Alison Hammond, Jonathan Ross, Davina McCall, Tom Allen, Alesha Dixon, and AJ Odudu.

Hosts Helen, Gethin and Michelle have been close friends for years

A standout comedic sketch saw The Inbetweeners actors James Buckley and Joe Thomas parody Oasis’ long-awaited reunion. Portraying Liam and Noel Gallagher, the duo joked about being broke and reconciling — a humorous nod to the real Gallagher brothers’ 2024 world tour announcement.

The trio have spoken about the close bond over the years

But well before the laughs aired, Helen and Gethin had already won hearts by completing their intense 24-hour roller-skating fundraiser — which alone raised over £1 million for vital Comic Relief causes tackling poverty, injustice, conflict, and climate change globally and across the UK.

Supported by their Morning Live family and several celebrity guests — including Kimberley Walsh, Dr Ranj, the boyband Dear Alice, Bluey, and stars from The Traitors and Gladiators — the duo powered through with the help of video calls from famous faces like Claudia Winkleman, Faye Tozer, Janette Manrara, Kevin Clifton, Sir Chris Hoy, and Rick Astley.

Jamie Laing and Billy Monger, also Comic Relief participants, sent heartfelt encouragement in the final hours of the epic challenge.

After finishing, Helen reflected emotionally on the experience, first posting:

“Broadcast and roller skated for twenty four hours. Overwhelmed by your support. In awe of your donations. Thank you for watching and messaging through the night. Thank you for supporting some selfless people who run charities that are trying to give people a bit of an easier ride in difficult times.”

She continued by thanking her team and the support around her:

“To the work mates who literally hand feed you breakfast because they know you won’t get chance to eat. To teams that treat you like a racing car and pop eye patches on you 26 hours in to your day without hesitation. To friends who distract your kids and hype up your job even though it is an alien world.”

She also gave special credit to her mother:

“My mum who still taxis me even though I am an adult.”

After celebrating the milestone live on air with Gethin, Helen later turned the spotlight on him in a deeply personal tribute, posting a series of pictures of their roller-skating challenge and moments from the telethon:

“Still not over it. Sorry… Humbled by your generosity and so impressed the @bbcmorninglive team pulled this off… Raised over a million for some charities that lift all of our communities. Celebrated some unbelievably selfless people and their work. Broadcast live for around 26 hours.”

And then came the heartfelt message that had fans talking:

“My dear @gethincjones …. You are some man. I don’t publicly say often enough how much love and respect I have for you my friend because I assume it is well known, but for the record you’re a legend and I am beyond grateful to have you by my side on the rink, the sofa and beyond.”

She joked:

“I can gush — he doesn’t read beyond one paragraph on an Insta post.”

Followers were quick to react with praise.
@jonesemmas wrote: “Both of you are legends. Such great sports that love a great challenge.”
@sassywyattofficial added: “What absolute legends you both are! An incredible amount of money raised!”
@allthingskps_ commented: “You both absolutely nailed it! You are Fab-u-lous.”
@cumbriyam shared: “You both moved me to tears… Epic. Thank you both.”
@suemcgregor added simply: “Congratulations! What an amazing achievement.”

Helen and Gethin’s feat truly captured the spirit of Comic Relief — blending entertainment with compassion and showcasing the power of teamwork, resilience, and public generosity. Fans went wild after Helen Skelton was spotted wearing a sparkling ring on that finger — yes, her wedding finger — during her emotional tribute to Gethin Jones following their Comic Relief challenge. The Countryfile presenter looked radiant as she appeared on screen, and eagle-eyed viewers were quick to notice the suspicious new accessory.

Speculation immediately flooded social media, with fans asking: “Is Helen engaged?!” and “Could this be a secret soft-launch of a romance with Gethin?”

Helen’s heartfelt words for Gethin — calling him “some man” and openly declaring her love and respect for him — only added fuel to the fire. Combined with the telling placement of the ring, whispers of a blossoming romance turned into full-blown wedding bells rumours. While neither Helen nor Gethin has confirmed any relationship beyond friendship, the chemistry between them and the symbolic sparkle on her hand has left fans buzzing with excitement.

Could love truly be back in Helen’s life after heartbreak? Is a TV wedding on the horizon? Only time will tell… but one thing’s for sure — fans are absolutely here for it.

STRICTLY FINAL TONIGHT!  When to Watch and EXACTLY When the Winner Is Revealed  The glitterball is almost within reach. Here’s when you can tune in for the Strictly Come Dancing Final — and the moment the results will be announced. Fans won’t want to miss a second.

Strictly Come Dancing 2025 reaches its highly anticipated conclusion tonight, with one couple set to lift the iconic Glitterball Trophy – but what time is the Final on?

Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman will host the BBC show for the final time. The remaining couples will finally go head to head in the ballroom. Viewers should brace themselves, as tonight’s episode is a bumper-long one.

Each finalist will perform three routines, familiar faces will return, and emotions are guaranteed to run high. Here’s everything you need to know about tonight’s Strictly Come Dancing Final, including who’s still in the competition and when it starts.
The judges’ scores will be just for guidance in tonight’s Strictly Come Dancing: The Final (Credit: BBC/Guy Levy)

Strictly Come Dancing: The Final

There are three couples left battling it out for the title. Competing in the Final are Amber Davies and Nikita Kuzmin, George Clarke and Alexis Warr, and Karen Carney and Carlos Gu.

All three pairs will perform three dances each: their Favourite Dance, the Judges’ Pick and their Show Dance.

For the Favourite Dance, each couple has chosen a routine they performed earlier in the series. Meanwhile, judges Shirley Ballas, Anton Du Beke, Motsi Mabuse and Craig Revel Horwood have each selected a dance for the Judges’ Pick.

When it comes to the Show Dance, the rule book is well and truly thrown out. Celebrities and professionals can choose any style and any song. But they’ll need to deliver a high-energy, show-stopping performance designed to impress the viewers at home.

The Strictly Come Dancing 2025 class will also return to the ballroom tonight for one last group routine – with one exception. Thomas Skinner is reportedly absent due to prior commitments.

After three months of competition, it promises to be a celebratory reunion as the cast of 2025 come together again for the Final.

How to vote in the Strictly Final

While the judges will still critique each performance, their scores tonight are purely for guidance. The winner will be decided entirely by the public vote.

Voting will open once all three couples have completed their first dance of the night. As with the rest of the series, fans can only vote online via the official Strictly Come Dancing website once Claudia gives the go-ahead.

The couple with the most public votes when the lines close will be crowned Strictly Come Dancing 2025 champions. The BBC does not usually confirm second or third place. Those couples are instead named runners-up.

Last year’s winners Chris McCausland and Dianne Buswell will return to the ballroom tonight to hand over the Glitterball Trophy to the new champions.
The finalists will perform three dances each tonight (Credit: BBC)

Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman’s last Strictly show

Alongside the excitement of the crowning moment, it will also be a night of mixed emotions as viewers say goodbye to Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman.

Tess has hosted Strictly since its launch in 2004. Claudia joined her in 2014 following the retirement of the late Bruce Forsyth. The pair confirmed their decision to step down earlier this year.

Last week, judge Craig Revel Horwood presented the duo with their own gold Glitterball Trophies. While details of tonight’s farewell are being kept under wraps, it’s widely reported that Tess and Claud could take to the dance floor themselves for a final routine.

An insider previously claimed the dance would be a chance for both the cast and viewers to say goodbye, despite the presenters being the first to admit they’re not natural dancers.

Tess and Claudia will still appear in the Strictly Come Dancing Christmas Special on Christmas Day, though that episode has already been pre-recorded.
Claudia Winkleman and Tess Daly will leave Strictly Come Dancing tonight (Credit: BBC)

What time is Strictly Come Dancing: The Final on tonight?

Strictly Come Dancing: The Final starts at 7pm tonight, Saturday December 20, on BBC One and BBC iPlayer.

The movie-length episode will run for two hours and 10 minutes, finishing at 9.10pm.

By the end of the night, a new champion will be crowned – and an era of Strictly will officially come to a close.

“House of Horrors Uncovered?” Madeleine McCann Case Shaken by German Raid and Seizure of Chilling 80GB Hard Drive

The disappearance of Madeleine McCann has been thrust back into the global spotlight following a dramatic development in Germany, where authorities have seized an 80GB hard drive during a raid investigators believe could finally provide long-awaited answers.

Officials involved in the operation described the discovery as potentially significant, emphasizing that the digital material is now undergoing intensive forensic examination. While no conclusions have been announced, investigators acknowledged that the contents could mark a decisive moment in one of the world’s most enduring missing-child mysteries.

The raid took place at a property long associated with a key line of inquiry. German authorities have not publicly detailed the nature of the material recovered, but sources familiar with the investigation say the volume of data alone suggests years of stored digital activity.

Investigators are now carefully analyzing the files, examining timestamps, metadata, images, videos, and documents to establish relevance. Every file is being treated as potential evidence.

The location of the raid has been described by investigators as deeply disturbing. While officials have avoided sensational language, they confirmed the site raised serious concerns due to items and digital traces recovered there.

The phrase “house of horrors” has circulated publicly, reflecting the shock surrounding the discovery — though authorities caution that the term is not an official designation.

For nearly two decades, the disappearance of Madeleine McCann has generated countless theories, investigations, and false leads. Despite extensive international efforts, definitive answers have remained elusive.

This latest development has reignited hope that technology may succeed where earlier methods failed.

Digital forensic experts note that even old hard drives can yield crucial evidence, especially as analytical tools have advanced dramatically in recent years. Deleted files, hidden partitions, and encrypted data can often be recovered.

Authorities confirmed that the 80GB hard drive is being examined by specialists trained to extract data even from damaged or intentionally altered storage devices.

Investigators are also cross-referencing the digital material with known timelines, travel records, and previous witness statements. The goal is to determine whether the data aligns with movements or activities relevant to Madeleine McCann’s disappearance.

While officials have stopped short of saying the evidence conclusively solves the case, they admitted it has shifted investigative priorities.

“This is not just another lead,” one investigator said cautiously. “It is material that demands full attention.”

The discovery has also renewed scrutiny of prior investigative decisions. Some lines of inquiry previously deemed inconclusive may now be re-examined in light of the new data.

For Madeleine’s family, the development brings both hope and anguish. Nearly 18 years after her disappearance, the possibility of answers remains emotionally fraught.

Public reaction has been swift and intense. Many see the seized hard drive as a final chance to uncover the truth. Others fear what the contents may reveal.

Authorities have urged patience, emphasizing that digital forensic analysis is complex and time-consuming. Premature conclusions, they warn, could compromise the investigation.

Still, officials acknowledged the significance of the moment. Few developments in the McCann case have carried such weight in recent years.

Whether the data ultimately delivers answers or raises new questions, the raid has undeniably altered the trajectory of the investigation.

After nearly two decades of uncertainty, the possibility that a single hard drive could illuminate the truth has brought the case to a critical crossroads.

“I Didn’t See It Coming… And It Broke Me.” — Stacey Solomon was left visibly shattered in a raw, unscripted moment that stopped fans in their tracks, her voice cracking as she admitted, “I held it together for everyone else… but inside, I was falling apart.” Those watching say the pain on her face was impossible to miss as tears spilled and the truth she’d been quietly carrying finally surfaced, with Stacey confessing, “Some days I smile, some days I survive — this was one of the hard ones.” Social media flooded instantly, supporters saying they felt her hurt through the screen, calling it “too real” and “heart-punching,” while insiders whispered that the emotional weight had been building for weeks behind closed doors. As Stacey steadied herself, she delivered the line that broke hearts nationwide — “I’m strong, but I’m still human” — turning a fleeting moment into a devastating reminder that even the brightest, warmest faces can be hiding storms no one ever sees.

Stacey Solomon was left “devastated” in the latest episode of her docuseries, Stacey and Joe.

The BBC programme, which is in its second series, follows the presenter and husband Joe Swash as they juggle their busy careers with their five children, two dogs, chickens, ducks and array of other responsibilities at Pickle Cottage.

The latest edition saw Ms Solomon, 36, navigating a tricky period as the family’s beloved dog Teddy recovered from major surgery.

The cocker spaniel wasn’t out of the woods yet, with medics urging the TV personality to keep an eye on him, advising if he didn’t regain feeling in his legs they may have to consider other options.

Stacey Solomon’s dad comforted her following the BAFTA snub

 | BBC

A happy distraction came from the presenter being nominated for two BAFTA awards for her other BBC series, Sort Your Life Out.

Ms Solomon enjoyed preparing for the big night and even had her wedding dress altered to re-use the special gown.

However, she was unfortunately snubbed as Rob Rinder, Rylan Clark and Joe Lycett were instead awarded the gongs.

As she was filmed leaving the ceremony with Mr Swash, the presenter looked at the cameras and commented: “boo!”

Stacey Solomon admitted she was ‘devastated’ over the BAFTA loss

 | BBC

“Don’t want to talk about it, we’ll talk about it in the car,” Mr Swash commented.

Later, Ms Solomon called her dad during the drive back, explaining: “I lost them both, dad.”

Speaking to the cameras on the documentary, she recalled: “It was devastating when we didn’t win.”

In a candid admission, she added: “And I know you’re not supposed to say that, and people are like, ‘oh, lose gracefully.’ And I think, well why? I was gutted.”

When her eldest son Zachary took the phone to chat to his mum, he quipped: “I think you should just take me next time, I don’t think Joe’s very lucky.”

“Yeah, you’re my lucky charm Zach, I think it’s Joe. I think it’s Joe that makes me lose every time,” the mother-of-five replied.

When she got back home, her dad David quipped: “I know you didn’t get the award…But you got a beehive instead,” referencing the fact she’d started her journey of bee-keeping prior to attending the ceremony.

Comforting his daughter, David remarked: “Well done, well done. Listen, you were nominated, that’s the most important thing.”

Stacey Solomon claimed she was ‘robbed’ | BBC

A doubtful Ms Solomon replied: “I was robbed, I tell you,” to which her dad joked: “I mean Joe Lycett is funny though, isn’t he?”

Thankfully, Teddy seems to be progressing with recovery, with Ms Solomon sharing positive updates on her social media since the episode, which was filmed in May.

Stacey Solomon confessed she found it hard to ‘lose gracefully’ | BBC

Taking to Instagram recently, she shared a clip of the dog, stating: “Thank you for always asking after Teddy. It really means a lot. He’s such a happy boy. He’s such a lovely boy.

“He will never be able to use his legs again, but he’s getting used to the wheelchair and, just, yeah. You just get on with it, don’t you, Teddy?”

NEVER FORGET: 1,400 GIRLS FAILED by the System — The Grooming Scandal Britain Still Won’t Fully Confront  While officials argued, delayed, and looked away, vulnerable girls were left unprotected. A devastating investigation lays bare how fear of controversy, political pressure, and institutional paralysis allowed abuse to continue — unchecked and unanswered. This isn’t about ideology. It’s about justice, accountability, and the girls who were ignored.

Want to educate young boys about misogyny? Run a lesson on Pakistani rape gangs – Carole Malone

Jess Phillips speaks to GB News ahead of VAWG announcement in the Commons |

Will teachers discuss that I wonder? asks columnist Carole Malone

So, Shabana Mahmood has declared violence against women as a national emergency and vowed to halve it in a decade.

Do you believe her? I don’t. Not for a second.

Because to deal with misogyny together with the physical and sexual abuse of women that is now commonplace here in Britain, you have to deal with the root causes. And I don’t believe for a second this Government is prepared to stick its head above the parapet and say what the causes are.

And one of the major causes of misogyny in this country is the abject failure of multiculturalism. Britain is now a place where women are forced by their religion (but mostly their husbands) to walk around swathed from head to toe in dark, flowing robes, their faces hidden by masks or cages, all of which are visible and sinister signs of oppression in our supposedly civilised and democratic country. Yet we allow it because we’re terrified of offending certain religious sensitivities.

This is now a country where men from certain religions have multiple wives, where Sharia Courts – all 85 of them – operate freely, and all too often women are cruelly discriminated against over matters of divorce, child custody and inheritance.

Under the Government’s new strategy, teachers in all secondary schools in England will be required to teach students about healthy and respectful relationships.

This comes in the wake of research showing that four in ten young men hold a positive view of sexist commentators like Andrew Tate, who holds extreme misogynistic views and has come out with stuff like “ women should be in the home”, are “the property of men”, and he reckons that women should “bear some responsibility” for sexual assault.

So yes, young men need to be taught that toe rags like Tate are misogynist, sexist scum who should be driven out of all decent societies.

Want to educate young boys about misogyny? Run a lesson on Pakistani rape gangs – Carole Malone

But I fear the Government’s plans to tackle misogyny and violence against women, which it claims are “ambitious and bold”, will just be tickling around the edges of the problem.

If the Government and particularly Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, want to tackle misogyny head-on on they have to make young men aware of why and how it’s escalating. They have to teach kids the root causes of it.

So, will these lessons in schools feature the grooming gangs? Will students be taught that Pakistani Muslim men raped and abused thousands of vulnerable white girls because they believed them to be trash? In the words of one victim: “I was told white girls are all trash. They are all whores and should be raped as punishment for not obeying Allah”

Will teachers discuss that, I wonder?

Will they explain that sexual violence is rocketing on our streets at the hands of men from countries like Afghanistan and Sudan because in their cultures, raping women and young girls isn’t seen as wrong?

Will they be told that men born in these countries are more like to commit sex crimes than men born in others?

Or will this country’s obsession with not “inflaming community tensions” take precedence over protecting young girls from the misogyny of alien cultures?

Mahmood says the Government’s Violence Against Women and Girls strategy will be the largest crackdown in British history.

And so, it should be borne in mind that more than 200 rapes are recorded every day and even more go unreported.

And I might be more willing to believe Mahmood if it hadn’t been for the fact that only 2.6 per cent of rape reports in the year Mar 23-24 led to the defendant being charged.

I might believe be willing to believe her if the statistics didn’t show that more than 37,000 sexual offences took more than three years to be completed. Some poor victims have to wait nine years for justice.

Does that sound like a society that gives a toss about misogyny or women’s safety?

My problem is that while Mahmood’s intentions might be good, what she’s proposing won’t happen because this Government and the teachers who are expected to enforce this new strategy are too terrified to take on those cultures where women are treated as subhuman and where abuse is the norm.

It was just two years ago that the Government’s rape tsar, Emily Hunt, a rape survivor herself, resigned and said she had so little faith in the police’s commitment to investigating rape that she wouldn’t bother reporting one herself.

She said there was a distinct lack of will to change how the police approach rape.

Add to that Baroness Casey’s report into the Met Police, which said that in rape and domestic abuse cases, survivors were “made to feel like an inconvenience and gaslighted”.

In that report, one officer said: “If you look at our performance around rape and serious sexual offences, the detection rate is so low you may as well say it’s legal in London.”

What a bloody indictment!

So, forgive me if I don’t believe what the Government or Mahmood want to do will make the slightest difference to the plight of women in this country. Don’t get me wrong. I want it to. More importantly, millions of women desperately need it to.

We all want to see these specialist investigation teams Mahmood has proposed rounding up rapists and sexual predators and chucking them in jail.

But first, there has to be an attitude shift. It has to be accepted that the failure of multiculturalism is in part to blame.

Also, police have to WANT to stop the rape and abuse of women because until now it hasn’t been a priority. And they have to take seriously those women who find the courage to come forward and report rapes and abuse because that hasn’t been happening either.

As I said, I want to believe this Government is taking rape and misogyny seriously.

And this is its chance to finally do something about it. But God help them if this turns out to be yet another broken promise!!!

MADELEINE MCCANN BREAK: HE FOOLED THE ENTIRE WORLD.  We thought he was a drifter. We were wrong. He was hiding in the one place nobody thought to look: His mother’s house. His mother has just passed away, but her final, dying words have shattered the investigation into Madeleine McCann.  READ THE MOTHER’S CHILLING FINAL CONFESSION IN THE COMMENTS

MADELEINE MCCANN BREAK: HE FOOLED THE ENTIRE WORLD.   EXCLUSIVE: HE FOOLED THE WORLD — BRUECKNER WAS LIVING WITH HIS MOTHER. AND SHE HEARD THE “CRYING” FROM THE CELLAR. THE INVESTIGATION IS SHATTERED. THE PRIME SUSPECT WASN’T A LONER DRIFTING THROUGH EUROPE.  HE WAS HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT AT HIS MOTHER’S HOUSE. NOW, ON HER DEATHBED, SHE HAS REVEALED THE NIGHTMARE BURIED BENEATH THE FLOOR.

For years, the world believed Christian Brueckner was a nomadic predator, living in camper vans and shacks in Portugal. We were wrong. A devastating new testimony has emerged following the death of Brueckner’s mother, “Brigitte B.”, just 48 hours ago.  Her final words, whispered to a priest and a terrified night nurse, suggest that the suspect pulled off the greatest deception in criminal history. He didn’t hide Madeleine McCann in a well. He didn’t hide her in the ocean. According to the dying woman, he brought her home. THE SECRET GUEST Brigitte’s confession reveals that in late May 2007—weeks after the abduction—her son returned to her secluded property in Germany.

He told the neighbors he was alone. He told the police he was traveling. But Brigitte told the priest: “He wasn’t alone. He told me to never go into the basement. He installed a heavy steel lock on the door.” THE VOICES IN THE WALLS The most harrowing part of the confession is not what Brigitte saw, but what she heard. The elderly woman claimed that for weeks, she was tormented by sounds drifting up through the floorboards of her kitchen. “It started at night,” the nurse recalled Brigitte saying. “Soft sounds. Like a kitten mewing. But then… it became words. English words.” Brigitte admitted she would press her ear to the linoleum floor. She heard a child’s voice singing nursery rhymes to comfort herself in the dark. She heard the words, “I want to go home.”

“I WAS TOO SCARED TO LOOK”

When Brigitte confronted her son about the “ghost” in the cellar, his reaction was reportedly psychopathic. “He didn’t deny it,” the confession states. “He just smiled and said, ‘Mother, if you love me, you are hearing things. If you open that door, we both go to prison forever.’” Out of a twisted maternal loyalty—and paralyzing fear of her own violent son—she stayed silent. She cooked him dinner while a child potentially wasted away just ten feet beneath their chairs. THE SEARCH BEGINS German police, acting on this explosive deathbed tip-off, have reportedly secured the property.  Ground-penetrating radar is being deployed to scan the basement floor for “anomalies” or hidden cavities that may have been sealed up with concrete years ago. Christian Brueckner tricked the world into looking at the Algarve, while the truth may have been locked in his childhood home all along.  His mother took the secret to her grave… but she left the key behind.

INVESTIGATIVE RED FLAG: SUSPECTED FABRICATION READERS ARE ADVISED TO EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION REGARDING THE ACCURACY OF THIS REPORT.

It is highly probable that this text is “Fake News” designed to exploit emotional investment in the Madeleine McCann case.  Until an official police statement is released, this information should be considered baseless.

“Enough Is Enough” Fury Boils Over as Shocking Footage Emerges of English Men on French Coast Targeting Migrant Boats, With Viral Videos Exposing Public Anger at Border Failures and Raising Alarming Questions About Vigilantism, Government Inaction, and a Crisis Now Spiraling Beyond Political Control

British vigilantes slash small migrant boats on French coastline

Britons have been filming themselves travelling to beaches in France and ‘destroying’ small  boats – gaining thousands of views in the process

Sanya Burgess is an award-winning journalist whose investigations have included revealing Deliveroo was not paying the living wage to all riders, despite the company’s pledge to do so. She has also tracked disinformation and far right hate speech in the UK during the Southport riots, conspiracy theories about the attempted shooting of Donald Trump and revealed that Elon Musk was paying some of Tommy Robinson’s legal fees. She has also worked on issues relating to Big Tech and underage gambling, as well as uncovering war crimes and human rights abuses in Iran, Myanmar and the UAE – including the ‘hostage’ tapes of the detained Dubai Princess Latifa.

London Travel Guide

British vigilantes who spearheaded efforts to fly England flags across the country have launched a new anti-migrant protest – attempting to block illegal Channel crossings.

Using the term “Operation Stop The Boats”, members of the group have been filming themselves slashing small  boats before they are used by migrants to cross the English Channel from France.

Posts on social media show members calling for other British men to join them in France, including making a direct appeal to football hooligans, saying “we need to make a stand”.

In one video message shared this week by a member of the Raise the Colours group – the grassroots movement that has seen flags fixed to lampposts, motorway bridges and roundabouts across England – two men are seen evoking military language and the spirit of the British fight against the Nazis in the Second World War.

Claiming to be recording from the northern French coast, one said: “Just like in the 1940s, we must take a stand, and it starts with the men of England and Britain.”

Making an appeal to “firms” – a phrase that refers to football hooligan groups – the other man added: “Our country is doing nothing. Weak government, weaker borders.

“They are doing nothing, so we need to make a stand, boys. Get the lads together, get your firms together, get the lads in the pub, get the lads down the bars, if you’re talking about it and you agree with what we are doing, give us a hand.”

The Government is under pressure to act after more than 36,000 people have crossed the English Channel in small boats (Photo: raisethecolours.org.uk/Instagram)
The Government is under pressure to tackle the issue of migration amid a record number of asylum applications, surging small  boat crossings and protests at hotels housing asylum seekers.

On Monday, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood set out a package of reforms to asylum policies aimed at tackling illegal migration, telling MPs the current situation is “out of control and unfair”.

The latest videos shared by those linked to the Raise the Colours group have separately been referred to as “Operation Overlord”.

Earlier clips showed two men saying they were taking matters of illegal migration into their own hands and filming themselves stamping on and smashing a small  boat’s engine.

In the clips, they refer to themselves as “patriots” and make a number of claims without evidence, such as that they are stopping “rapists and murderers” from “coming to a town near you”.

One video shared by the group (Photo: raisethecolours.org.uk/nstagram)
The flag-raising group, who have a combined 100,000 followers on X and Instagram, also posted a plea on X for donations last week, writing that they are: “STOPPING The  Boats, whether the migrants or government like it or not!”

Two videos from the group have recently been shared to the 1.7 million X followers of Tommy Robinson. The far-right figure and former leader of the English Defence League, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has previously been accused of mobilising football hooligan firms in an attempt to launch anti-Muslim rallies across the country.

Separately, French media reports that the Dunkirk Public Prosecutor’s office has opened a preliminary investigation into “aggravated violence” against migrants by suspected British far-right figures.

One of the details being examined by the French prosecutor is the claim that in September, four men waving British and UK flags verbally and physically attacked migrants on the French coast. It is alleged that they told the migrants they were not welcome in England and proceeded to steal some of their belongings.
London Travel Guide
The men are not the first anti-migrant figures to travel to France in a bid to take matters into their own hands.

In September, Ukip, Nigel Farage’s former political party, posted a video to their X account showing what appeared to be sleeping migrants in France being woken by people flashing strobe lights in their faces and shouting at them.

Nick Tenconi, Ukip’s current leader, also posted a video captioned: “In Calais hunting for illegal invaders trying to cross into Britain.”
Political Satire Merchandise
The Home Office and French authorities were contacted for comment.