WEDDING DRAMA DEEPENS — Holly Ramsay highlights her siblings’ “special” role in pre-wedding celebrations… as Adam Peaty’s family remains frozen out. And her glowing praise for Victoria Beckham is raising eyebrows

Holly Ramsay has risked antagonizing her new husband’s estranged family by revealing the important role her brothers and sisters had in arranging their pre-wedding celebrations.

The influencer daughter of celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay exchanged vows with Adam Peaty in a lavish ceremony at Bath Abbey on December 17.

But for all its pomp and splendor, the wedding – attended by the newly knighted Sir David Beckham and his wife, Lady Victoria – was overshadowed by an ugly family dispute that led to the swimmer’s own mother being barred from the service.

The Olympic swimmer’s father Mark, brothers James and Richard and an assortment of other family members, among them his aunt Louise, her husband and his cousin Luke, subsequently skipped the wedding in support of Caroline, leaving his older sister Bethany to serve as one of the only principal family members in attendance.

Taking to Instagram on Friday, Holly appeared oblivious to the ongoing feud while outlining the important role her own family played as she and Adam prepared for their big day.

She wrote: ‘The night before our wedding we hosted an intimate cocktail party to kick start the Weekend Celebrations.

Holly Ramsay has risked antagonizing her new husband’s estranged family by revealing the important role her brothers and sisters had in arranging their pre-wedding celebrations

Taking to Instagram on Friday, Holly appeared oblivious to the ongoing feud while outlining the important role her own family played as she and Adam prepared for their big day

The wedding was overshadowed by an ugly family dispute that led to the swimmer’s own mother Caroline being barred from the service (L-R: Colin, Richard, Caroline, James, Adam and Bethany Peaty)

‘My siblings all did a speech which was so special and we celebrated with cake, spicy margs and then an early night, ready for the big day!!’

Holly also heaped praise on close family friend Lady Victoria Beckham for designing the elegant slip shew wore on the night.

Peaty stunned followers last year when it was revealed that many of his relatives would not be attending his wedding, after his mother Caroline was uninvited.

The astonishing family feud kicked off after news arose that  mother was not invited to Holly’s hen-do, an event attended by her own mother, Peaty’s sister Bethany and Victoria Beckham at Soho Farmhouse.

In the wake of the snub, a number of stories of strife unravelled, with claims on each side about the fallout – including allegations that the bride and groom made Caroline choose a different outfit for the wedding as they didn’t approve of her choice.

Peaty’s heartbroken mother has since shared a series of poignant Instagram posts as she attempts to move on from the snub.

Her latest reads: ‘I won’t end this year pretending everything was fine. I lost a piece of myself this year that I will never get back and I’m not forcing a smile like it didn’t change me.

‘So no… I won’t be saying “2026 is going to be my year.” I’ll be praying that I recover next year, that my heart never has to break like this again, that I never have to survive something like this again.

Many of Peaty’s family missed the wedding, leaving his older sister Bethany to serve as one of the only principal family members in attendance (pictured right, as a bridesmaid)

Insiders have claimed that Bethany’s decision to not only attend the wedding but also to accept such a prominent role in the bridal party has left her mother feeling ‘betrayed’

Holly recently shared a quick split second look at one of the four dresses she wore over two days for her nuptials to Peaty

‘I’ll be praying for peace… real peace., the kind that let’s me breathe without fighting for it. I deserve a year that doesn’t hurt.’

Meanwhile, Holly has been accused of cashing in on her big day by tagging the brands she has worked with.

And sharing several images of her trip to Smythson, she wrote: ‘Designing our wedding stationery with @smythson was a dream come true.

‘From the engraved plate mark invites with gold bevelled edges to the dark green tissue lined envelopes, it all added the perfect touch to our weekend.’

Getting into the swing of Instagram life, Adam shared the video and wrote: ‘Honestly made our wedding even more special.’

The post was not marked up as an ad or a paid post so the nature of the collaboration is unknown.

Cat Deeley faces criticism over comments on Jesy Nelson’s twins after SMA diagnosis

Disability advocate Sophie Morgan has criticised Cat Deeley for her ‘inappropriate’ choice of words while discussing Jesy Nelson‘s twins’ diagnosis.

Former Little Mix star Jesy, 34, confirmed her twins with partner Zion Foster – eight-month-old daughters Ocean Jade and Story Monroe – had been diagnosed with the Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA1) last week.

Cat, 49, said on Thursday’s episode of This Morning that ‘disabled children can live normal lives’ if a screening process for SMA is put into place, while discussing Jesy Nelson’s twins’ condition.

Presenter Sophie, 40, who is paralysed following a car crash 22 years ago, reshared a post from disabled Guardian writer Frances Ryan.

It read: ‘I’m sure @catdeeley means nothing but kindness here but worth noting the kids “could have lived normal lives” is not an appropriate phrase.

‘Disabled children CAN have careers, marriages, mates. But they will face structural barriers to get them, as well as (sometimes) physical pain and suffering.

‘This is one reason why having disabled journalists in the media is crucial. There are four non-disabled people here discussing how disability affects lives (one of whom has spent years arguing to cut disability benefits).

Disability advocate Sophie Morgan has criticised Cat Deeley for her ‘inappropriate’ choice of words while discussing Jesy Nelson’s twins’ diagnosis of SMA on Thursday

Cat said ‘disabled children can live normal lives’ if a screening process for SMA is put into place as she and co-host Ben Shephard discussed Jesy’s campaign on This Morning

While Sophie and other disability advocates noted Cat meant well, they shared their frustration over her choice of language, (pictured with Jesy on Wednesday’s episode of This Morning)

‘Many people like Cat will mean well but you need people in the room who can bring nuance and knowledge that only comes with lived experience.’

Reposting the message to her Instagram, Sophie penned: ‘Spot on @frances.ryan85. We also need disabled people BEHIND the camera to make sure these on camera discussions are nuanced. It takes a team.’

Jesy had appeared on This Morning to draw attention to the United Kingdom’s failure to test for SMA1 (Spinal Muscular Atrophy Disease Type 1) at birth, a practice currently available in 45 countries across the world, including the United States.

The test costs just 36p and early treatment for Spinal Muscular Atrophy is crucial, with newborn screening enabling intervention before symptoms appear and dramatically improving outcomes like survival, sitting and walking.

Cat also said: ‘It was interesting Nick [Ferrari] because I was looking into it yesterday before we spoke to Jesy and it’s available in 43 countries around the world. It’s been available in the Unites States since 2023.

‘So for the sake of 36p, to me it seems ridiculous that we are not already doing this especially when time is of the essence and the treatment can be got so that the children can live normal lives’.

Join the debate

Were Cat Deeley’s choice of words ‘inappropriate’?

Comment now

Former Little Mix star Jesy, 34, confirmed her twins with partner Zion Foster, eight-month-old daughters Ocean Jade and Story Monroe, had been diagnosed with the Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

Jesy (pictured after giving birth) with her twins and fiancé Zion Foster

What is spinal muscular atrophy?

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a disease that weakens a patient’s strength by affecting the motor nerve cells in the spinal cord.

It results in gradual muscle wasting and the severity of symptoms varies by type

Type 1 SMA is the most severe and is evident at birth. The weakening of muscles means sufferers cannot sit and usually leads to death by the age of five

Type 2  is intermediate with the sufferer being unable to stand

Type 3 is mild and makes it difficult to get up from a sitting position, while

Type 4 sufferers don’t have symptoms until they are in their 20s or 30s

Jesy has since been praised by the parents of other affected children across the UK by highlighting the issue during a recent appearance on ITV show This Morning, with many stunned by the affordability of SMA1 testing.

In one post, reshared by Nelson on her Instagram platform, follower Katie Hughes – the mother of a young boy living with the condition – called the revelation ‘devastating and shocking’.

She added: ’36p to change the course of a child’s life, it’s nothing really, is it? I was in tears when I watched that. I felt sick because 36p could have massively changed our little boy’s life.

‘And it would have changed so many little kids out there and their lives and what they go through on a daily basis. It angers me that we’re talking such a little amount, I didn’t realise it was that small.’

On Sunday, Jesy told social media followers that after ‘the most gruelling three or four months’ her daughters had been diagnosed with SMA1.

The disease causes progressive muscle weakness and wasting due to motor neuron loss, but they ‘could have saved their legs’ with early treatment.

During a subsequent appearance on This Morning she explained that because the diagnosis was not made at birth, Great Ormond Street doctors advised that her girls ‘are probably never going to be able to walk or regain their neck strength so they will be disabled’.

Speaking on the ITV show, she said: ‘The part that frustrates me the most I knew and saw all of the signs before I knew what SMA was.’

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has since admitted that Nelson was ‘right to challenge and criticise how long it takes to get a diagnosis’

Read More

Cat Deeley brands Jesy Nelson the strongest women she’s met after twins’ muscular disease diagnosis

Jesy and her partner Zion noticed symptoms such as their twins’ bowed legs and unusual breathing but were reassured by health visitors and GPs that as their babies were born premature they may be delayed in hitting certain milestones and not to compare their children to others.

She added: ‘I potentially could have saved their legs. I don’t think I’ll ever be able to get over or accept it. All I can do is try my best and make change.

‘It was weird because from when I was in NICU [Neonatal Intensive Care Unit], the way they used to lay on my chest, they would have frog leg position.

‘I did say to my mum, “Isn’t their belly an unusual shape?” They breathe from their belly.’

Sharing a video of one of the girls’ breathing, she admitted ‘that’s what frustrating – for me, if these were the cards I was always going to be dealt and there was nothing I could do about it, it would be easier for me to accept’.

‘But when you know there is something that can be done about it and it is life changing to your child, that’s the bit that I cannot accept,’ Jesy added.

‘When I took them home from NICU, the only thing I was really concerned about at that time was like checking their temperature, making sure they’re still breathing. I’m not checking to see if their legs are still moving…’

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has since admitted that Jesy was ‘right to challenge and criticise how long it takes to get a diagnosis’.

The Cabinet minister said he was ‘determined to look not just at screening for SMA, but to make much better use of genomic medicine’.

Newborn screening for SMA is not available in the UK, but Scotland has announced it will screen babies from the spring.

The UK National Screening Committee does not recommend screening but has commissioned work to reassess this due to developments in treatment.

Mr Streeting told ITV News: ‘My heart goes out to to Jesy Nelson and I think the way she has spoken about what must be an unimaginably frightening situation has been commendable, not least because there will be other parents who are going through what she is going through, who I think will relate very heavily to what she said.

‘She’s challenged us to go further on screening, and she is right to do so.’

LABOUR FREEFALL AS FARAGE SURGES ! From a landslide in 2024 to just 85 seats today, Keir Starmer’s Labour is projected to lose 326 MPs. Reform UK, riding a year of relentless momentum, now stands on the brink of one of the most disproportionate election victories in British history.

Reform UK on course for three-figure Commons majority while Labour brace for General Election disaster in bombshell mega poll

Reform UK is set for a three-figure majority in the House of Commons, while Labour are set for a huge slump, a bombshell poll has revealed.

It’s been a year of continued growth for Nigel Farage and Reform this year, demonstrated at local level where they made a net gain of 94 seats – the most of any party by a significant distance.

But now, on a national level, More in Common’s January MRP projects a Reform UK majority if a General Election were held today.

The organisation suggests, based on polling of more than 16,000 Britons, Reform would take 381 seats.

Mr Farage’s party are projected to win a majority of 112 over all other parties combined, with their earlier rapid polling gains now seemingly holding steady.

This would see Reform winning 60 per cent of seats on 31 per cent of the vote, rivalling the 2024 General Election as one of the most disproportionate results in modern British history.

Reform UK are set for a three-figure majority in the House of Commons, a bombshell poll has revealed

However, Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party’s slump is projected to continue.

On a local level, Labour ended 2025 with 89 seats fewer than they started.

More in Common project that, as it stands, Sir Keir’s party would slump to just 85 seats, a loss of 326 seats from their July 2024 landslide.

The report also suggests that Kemi Badenoch’s Tories are “stabilising”, and, while still down on their 2024 count, the result would be better than the previous MRP projection.

Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party’s slump is projected to continue

It also puts them within touching distance of Labour – just 15 seats.

As for the sudden emergence of the Green Party under Zack Polanski, whose membership numbers shot up from 70,000 to 180,000 in the final four months of the year, it remains positive.

They are projected to more than double their parliamentary presence from four to nine seats, taking seats directly from Labour.

More in Common UK Director Luke Tryl said that, based on polling since the Budget, Reform could hope for a “substantial three-figure majority”.

He added that the “Polanski surge” gave momentum to the Greens through “disillusioned progressives putting them within shouting distance of many more gains from Labour,” who in turn would “slump to a modern low”.

But Mr Tryl warned: “There is one major caveat: tactical voting. For the first time we have explored how tactical voting could reshape the model projections.

“It suggests the Liberal Democrats could be big winners here – and if that tactical voting is anywhere close to the scale we saw in Caerphilly, that parties of the left could deny Reform a majority and form a rainbow coalition of their own.”

The Liberal Democrats ran out major victors at local level throughout 2025. Ed Davey’s party won 106 Council by-elections in 2025, more than any other party.

They also held an astonishing 82 per cent of seats they defended in by-elections last year.

Mr Tryl continued: “The threat of tactical voting, combined with the narrow margin of many of Reform’s projected victories, suggests their momentum may have at least temporarily stalled.

“That, combined with the fact we are still years from an election, means that despite their success in 2025, the path to the next general election is still far from known.”

Joanna Lvmley aпd Hvsband Qυietly Pay £450,000 in School Meal Debt, Restoriпg Digпity to Thovsands of Children Across the UK

Joanna Lumley and Husband Quietly Pay £450,000 in School Meal Debt, Restoring Dignity to Thousands of Children Across the UK

In a world where generosity often announces itself loud and unapologetic, Joanna Lumley and her husband, Stephen Barlow, chose compassion over spectacle — and did it quietly.

It didn’t appear on a red carpet. No press release. No photo op.

Between 2019 and the height of the cost-of-living crisis, the couple paid off more than £450,000 in outstanding school meal debt across the UK — debts that had left tens of thousands of children quietly hungry or humiliated.

65 DAYS WITHOUT FOOD and a woman on remand says she is “dying in this cell”. the hunger strike at hmp new hall is now being compared to the darkest chapters of british prison history, raising urgent questions about justice, delay and duty of care.

Hunger striker says ‘I’m dying in this cell’ after 65 days without food in prison

Heba Muraisi said she is struggling to breathe and has difficulty concentrating as she approaches 66 days on hunger strike while on remand in prison (Picture: Prisoners for Palestine)
Groceries

A hunger striker on remand over her alleged role in a Palestine Action raid has said she is ‘deteriorating’ and struggling to breathe.

Heba Muraisi is on day 65 without food after becoming the first member of an initial group of eight prisoners to begin the action.

Struggling to record audio over the course of several days, she said she is ‘terrified’ but kept going by ‘love and solidarity’ as her condition worsens at HMP New Hall in Flockton, West Yorkshire.

The hunger strike is believed to be the largest of its type in the British Isles since 1981, when 10 Irish prisoners died.

They included IRA leader Bobby Sands, who went 66 days without food.

The 31-year-old spent almost a week recording the answers to questions from Metro as she is having difficulty concentrating.

‘As each day passes I get weaker, aches worsen, headaches are frequent and concentrating is extremely difficult,’ she said.

‘My body shakes, I get dizzy to the point of nausea and now breathing is getting hard. I am deteriorating in this cell, I am dying.’

Supporters of the Palestine Action hunger strikers hold pictures showing three of the group including Heba Muraisi (Picture: Guy Smallman/Getty Images)

‘Denied communication’

The protester, from Barnet, north London, is awaiting trial over her alleged role in the break-in at a research and development facility owned by Elbit Systems, a UK subsidiary of an Israeli defence firm, in Filton near Bristol.

The lifeguard and florist was arrested in a dawn raid on November 19 last year, according to support group Prisoners for Palestine.

Her trial is not scheduled to take place until June, by which time she will have spent close to two years in prison on remand.

Muraisi said: ‘Prison is prison, it’s the same oppressive system under the false pretence that it is rehabilitation.

‘Here I’ve been heavily restricted and monitored, visitors not being approved, phone numbers being rejected including doctors, emails getting blocked, my legal team has been ignored.

‘On day 45 of my hunger strike I was threatened to be forcefully moved by a custodial manager in the presence of a senior officer.

‘I was moved away from my support system I had built, and the only friend I had made on this new wing was recently just moved.’

Heba Muraisi is on hunger strike at HMP New Hall in West Yorkshire as she awaits trial over her alleged role in a Palestine Action raid (Picture: Prisoners for Palestine)

What can happen during a hunger strike?

Ian Miller, a historian of hunger strikes in British prisons, told Metro that a hunger strike can typically play out physiologically as follows:

Days One to Seven: decreasing heart rate, physical wasting, weight loss (as bodies eat up their fat reserves in the adipose tissue.

Days Eight to Fourteen: Bodies begin using glycogen stores (energy located in the liver and muscles). Ammonia produced giving a distinctive smell. Weight loss slows down. Loss of heart mass causing a slow heart beat.

Days Fifteen Onwards: Tendencies to collapse and become bedbound. Nightmares very common early on. Physical and psychological health worsens significantly. Very disturbed sleep. ‘Raving all night’, as one hunger strike termed it in the 1920s.

Around twenty to sixty/seventy days: Patients essentially in a state of complete exhaustion, but often still conscious until around 50 days.

Over 70 days: With zero medical intervention or food, this seems to be roughly the limit of survival. In 1920, hunger striker Terence MacSwiney lasted 74 days before he died.
Groceries

Mum’s prayers

Teuta Hoxha, Kamran Ahmed and Lewie Chiaramello are also taking part in the hunger strike, while Amu Gib, Jon Cink, Umer Khalid and Qesser Zuhrah have ‘paused’ their participation.

All eight are on remand, charged with offences relating to break-ins and criminal damage either at Elbit in August 2024 or another raid at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire in June last year.

The protesters’ demands include ‘end all censorship’ of communication and correspondence in jail, immediate bail, ‘right to a fair trial’, de-proscribing Palestine Action and shutting Elbit down.

Muraisi, who has family in Rafah on the Gaza Strip, has previously stated that she ‘will not compromise until all demands are met’ and will ‘continue to fight and resist’ in prison.

Heba Muraisi looks outside her prison cell at HMP New Hall as she continues her hunger strike while on remand (Picture: Prisoners for Palestine)
She said: ‘It’s the love and solidarity from the people and my mum’s duas (personal prayer) that give me strength.
Gift baskets
‘And it’s the rage from the injustice my comrades and I are facing that keeps me going. I’m well aware that things could turn at any minute, I’m terrified, I’d be stupid not to be.

‘As of today, I’ve been held on remand for 409 days while awaiting trial.

‘To make things worse I’ve been moved nearly 188 miles up north away from my family and support system.’

Muraisi has daily calls with her mum but said: ‘When New Hall cut off my phone line for ridiculous security reasons it just causes unnecessary distress for her.’ Asked if her family supported her hunger strike, she replied: ‘I can’t say that my family support my current actions, but they understand why I’m doing it.’

From top left: Qesser Zuhrah, Amu Gib, Heba Muraisi, Jon Cink, Teuta Hoxha, Kamran Ahmed, Lewie Chiaramello and Muhammed Umer Khalid (Picture: Prisoners for Palestine)

‘Serious offences’

A spokesperson for Practice Plus Group, which manages healthcare on behalf of the NHS at New Hall, said: ‘We provide compassionate, evidence-based care in prisons and manage any patients who are refusing food in accordance with all the relevant policies and protocols, and in partnership with prison teams and the wider NHS.’
Groceries
The government maintains that it has no records from NHS staff that prison officers have obstructed healthcare.

Lord Timpson, minister of state for prisons, probation and reducing reoffending, said: ‘While very concerning, hunger strikes are not a new issue for our prisons.

‘Over the last five years, we’ve averaged over 200 a year and we have longstanding procedures in place to ensure prisoner safety.

‘Prison healthcare teams provide NHS care and continuously monitor the situation. HMPPS are clear that claims that hospital care is being refused are entirely misleading – they will always be taken when needed and a number of these prisoners have already been treated in hospital.

‘These prisoners are charged with serious offences including aggravated burglary and criminal damage.

‘Remand decisions are for independent judges, and lawyers can make representations to the court on behalf of their clients.

‘Ministers will not meet with them – we have a justice system that is based on the separation of powers, and the independent judiciary is the cornerstone of our system.

‘It would be entirely unconstitutional and inappropriate for ministers to intervene in ongoing legal cases.’

Emmerdale SURPRISE: Moments before Ray’s death, April shocked him by revealing, “I understand who Ceila was really after – you were simply a pawn to her.”

In a shocking twist on Emmerdale, April delivers a stunning final line to Ray before his demise, revealing a deeper conspiracy. Discover the full story behind this dramatic moment and what it means for the future of the characters. Read on to explore the implications of April’s revelation and the unfolding drama in Emmerdale.

Emmerdale SHOCKER: April’s Final Revelation to Ray

The long-running British soap opera, Emmerdale, is no stranger to shocking plot twists and dramatic confrontations. Recently, viewers were left on the edge of their seats as April, a beloved character, delivered a jaw-dropping line to Ray just moments before his unexpected demise. “I know what Ceila’s real target was – you were just her pawn,” she declared, leaving fans to ponder the implications of her words. This article delves into the significance of April’s revelation, the dynamics of the characters involved, and what this means for the future of Emmerdale.

The Build-Up to the Shocking Moment

For weeks, Emmerdale has been building tension around the character of Ray and his questionable alliances. As a character shrouded in mystery, Ray has been portrayed as a manipulative figure, often pulling strings from the shadows. His relationship with Ceila has been particularly enigmatic, leading viewers to speculate about their true intentions. April’s final line not only highlights the complexity of their relationship but also suggests that there is much more at play than meets the eye.

April’s journey in Emmerdale has been one of growth and resilience. From her early days as a child in the village to her current role as a pivotal character, she has faced numerous challenges. Her confrontation with Ray marks a turning point, showcasing her courage and determination to stand up against those who threaten her loved ones. This moment is not just about Ray’s fate; it symbolizes April’s evolution and her readiness to confront the darker aspects of her world.

The Implications of April’s Revelation

April’s assertion that Ray was merely a pawn in Ceila’s game raises several questions about the overarching narrative in Emmerdale. Who is Ceila, and what are her true motives? The revelation hints at a larger conspiracy that could have far-reaching consequences for the village and its residents. As viewers, we are left to wonder whether Ceila has been orchestrating events from behind the scenes, using Ray as a means to an end.

This twist also opens the door for new storylines and character developments. The fallout from Ray’s death is sure to ripple through the community, affecting not only April but also other key players in the Emmerdale saga. As secrets are unveiled and alliances shift, fans can expect a thrilling ride ahead. The writers of Emmerdale have a knack for weaving intricate plots, and this latest development is no exception.

Moreover, April’s line serves as a reminder of the power of knowledge and the importance of speaking out against injustice. In a world where characters often find themselves at the mercy of more powerful forces, April’s bravery stands out. It encourages viewers to reflect on their own lives and the importance of standing up for what is right, even in the face of danger.

What Lies Ahead for Emmerdale?

As the dust settles from this shocking turn of events, the future of Emmerdale remains uncertain. The aftermath of Ray’s death will undoubtedly lead to a series of dramatic confrontations, as characters grapple with their feelings of betrayal, loss, and revenge. April’s revelation could serve as a catalyst for change, pushing other characters to confront their own demons and make difficult choices.

In the coming episodes, viewers can anticipate a deeper exploration of Ceila’s character. Who is she really, and what are her motivations? As the story unfolds, it will be fascinating to see how the writers develop her character and the impact she has on the lives of those around her. Will she emerge as a formidable antagonist, or will her true intentions be revealed in a more sympathetic light?

Additionally, the dynamics between April and other characters will likely shift as a result of her bold statement. Relationships may be tested, alliances formed and broken, and new friendships forged in the wake of this shocking revelation. Emmerdale has always excelled at portraying the complexities of human relationships, and this storyline promises to be no different.

**Conclusion**

April’s stunning revelation to Ray has set the stage for an exciting new chapter in Emmerdale. As viewers, we are left to ponder the implications of her words and the potential consequences for the characters involved. With the promise of more drama, intrigue, and emotional moments ahead, now is the perfect time to tune in and witness the unfolding story. Don’t miss out on the latest developments in Emmerdale—stay engaged with the show and join the conversation about this shocking twist!

“THEY STOLE OUR FUTURE — AND WE’RE FIGHTING BACK!” Furious WASPI women finally break decades of silence in court, claiming their pensions were ripped from them and demanding justice. “We won’t be ignored any longer,” one campaigner shouted, voice shaking with rage. Legal experts warn this could be the flashpoint that redefines women’s rights in Britain, as the courtroom erupts and the nation watches every furious moment. Could this be the historic turning point where stolen futures are finally reclaimed? The battle is far from over — and the stakes have never been higher.

WASPI Women BLOW THE WHISTLE: “YOU STOLE OUR PENSIONS!” Court DRAMA EXPLODES!

A cɑse for stɑte pension compensɑtion for millions of women born in the 1950s is heɑding to court eɑrlier thɑn expected in the lɑtest development for the Women Agɑinst Stɑte Pension Inequɑlity (Wɑspi) cɑmpɑign.

Judges will convene for ɑn urgent cɑse mɑnɑgement heɑring tomorrow (December 3) to exɑmine how the Lɑbour Gσverпment’s pledge to revisit its stɑnce on Wɑspi compensɑtion ɑffects ongoing legɑl proceedings.

The Wɑspi cɑmpɑign hɑs lobbied MPs for pɑyouts, clɑiming women impɑcted by the equɑlisɑtion of the stɑte pension ɑge between the ʂeхes were not ɑdequɑtely informed.

According to those impɑcted, this resulted in mɑny women being ɑble to sufficiently prepɑre finɑnciɑlly for retirement ɑs they believed they would be ɑble to ɑccess pɑyments eɑrlier.

Lɑst yeɑr, ɑn investigɑtion by the Pɑrliɑment ɑnd Heɑlth Service Ombudsmɑn (PHSO) determined women born in the 1950s were victims of “mɑlɑdministrɑtion” in the Depɑrtment for Work ɑnd Pensions’ (DWP) hɑndling of sɑid chɑnges.

Despite this, both the Lɑbour ɑnd Conservɑtive Gσverпments refused to tɑke up the cɑse of stɑte pension compensɑtion. Aheɑd of the Budget, DWP minister Pɑt McFɑdden confirmed the Gσverпment were reexɑmining the cɑse.

Tomorrow’s two-ɑnd-ɑ-hɑlf-hour judiciɑl session on comes just six dɑys before the scheduled judiciɑl review chɑllenging ministers’ initiɑl rejection of compensɑtion recommendɑtions.

Angelɑ Mɑdden, chɑir of the Wɑspi cɑmpɑign hɑs criticised the lɑck of ɑction from Gσverпment

The heɑring represents ɑn unexpected development in the litigɑtion, with the court seeking to understɑnd the rɑmificɑtions of the Work ɑnd Pensions Secretɑry’s commitment mɑde in November to reconsider the originɑl decision to reject ɑ pɑyout.

Wɑspi’s legɑl chɑllenge ɑgɑinst the Gσverпment’s dismissɑl of compensɑtion proposɑls remɑins scheduled for December 9 ɑnd December 10, though the cɑmpɑign group hɑs instructed solicitors to pursue guɑrɑntees ɑbout the reconsiderɑtion process.

Notɑbly, the cɑmpɑign group wɑnts clɑrity on timelines ɑnd procedures before deciding whether to proceed with the full heɑring. Wɑspi cɑmpɑigners feɑr ministers might produce ɑnother decision mirroring the originɑl rejection, complete with whɑt they describe ɑs identicɑl legɑl deficiencies currently under chɑllenge.

No specific ɗeɑɗline hɑs been provided for completing the reconsiderɑtion, heightening concerns ɑbout potentiɑl delɑys in resolving the long-running dispute over stɑte pension ɑge chɑnges.

Angelɑ Mɑdden, who chɑirs WASPI, ɑcknowledged thɑt November’s ɑnnouncement mɑrked significɑnt progress ɑs ministers conceded cruciɑl evidence hɑd been overlooked when rejecting the Ombudsmɑn’s recommendɑtions on compensɑtion ɑnd injustice findings.

However, she criticised the Gσverпment’s reluctɑnce to clɑrify its ɑpproɑch to the reconsiderɑtion or provide ɑ definitive schedule.

“Our lɑwyers hɑve been pressing the Gσverпment on these ɑnd other mɑtters,” Ms Mɑdden stɑted.

“The imminent court heɑrings mɑy not be necessɑry, but only if we cɑn be confident the Gσverпment is willing to reconsider in the right wɑy.”

Cɑmpɑigners ɑre cɑlling on policymɑkers to do more for women born in the 1950s | WASPI

She described the issue of Wɑspi compensɑtion ɑs being “high stɑkes” for women impɑcted by the perceived historic injustice.

The impɑct extends beyond the millions of ɑffected women to the integrity of the Ombudsmɑn system itself, ɑccording to Ms Mɑdden, who wɑrned thɑt public trust in grievɑnce procedures ɑgɑinst government depɑrtments hɑngs in the bɑlɑnce.

“Most importɑntly of ɑll, every 13 minutes, ɑ Wɑspi womɑn ɗιes without seeing justice,” she sɑid, underlining the humɑn cσst of continued delɑys.

“I’M NOT APOLOGISING FOR TELLING THE TRUTH.” Rylan Clark has finally broken his silence after the This Morning migrant debate ignited a firestorm, delivering a blistering, no-nonsense response that left critics furious and supporters cheering, as he flatly refused to back down from the words that sparked outrage. Shaken but defiant, Rylan made it clear he won’t be bullied into silence, insisting, “I said what I said — and I stand by it,” as insiders say the fallout rattled producers and lit up group chats across ITV. Social media split instantly — some branding him reckless, others hailing him fearless — but one thing is certain: this wasn’t damage control, it was a line in the sand, and Rylan’s final message rang loud and cold — “If honesty makes people uncomfortable, that’s not my problem.”

Rylan Clark caused a huge stir earlier this year with his comments on immigration, made live on television.

Rylan Clark has broken his silence on his Ofcom backlash (Image: ITV)

This Morning star Rylan Clark has responded to the backlash over his controversial migrant rant on the ITV show, which occurred while he was performing in his Christmas pantomime last night (Sunday, December 28). The 37-year-old is playing the Fairy Godmother in Cinderella in Southend alongside Strictly Come Dancing contestant Ross King, who is portraying Buttons in the show, held at Southend Cliffs Pavilion. As part of an on-stage exchange, Ryan swore at the audience during a slip of the tongue. Reacting to the error, which happened in front of a young audience, he quipped that he might be cancelled for the second time in a year, referencing the outrage he sparked after voicing his opinions on illegal immigration earlier this year on This Morning.

Rylan has been part of This Morning for years (Image: Getty)

The radio host sparked more than 700 Ofcom complaints in August following his immigration remarks while hosting the ITV magazine show with Josie Gibson.

He said at the time: “This country is built on immigration. Legal immigration – a lot of the nurses and doctors who have saved my mum’s life have come over here from other countries. They’re living a great life, they’re paying into this tax system, they’re helping this country thrive.”

However, he expressed his concern about people crossing the Channel illegally and suggested that Keir Starmer’s Government’s approach seemed too accommodating.

Rylan added: “How can it be that if I turn up at Heathrow Airport as a British citizen and I’ve left my passport in Spain, I’ve got to stand at that airport and won’t be let in. But if I arrive on a boat from Calais, I get taken to a four-star hotel?”

The star’s comments caused a stir online, with Rylan taking to Instagram to state a person can be “pro-immigration but against illegal routes”.

An Ofcom spokesperson told The Independent at the time: “We’re assessing these complaints against our broadcasting rules, but are yet to decide whether or not to investigate.”

STARMER’S SHOCK MIGRATION U-TURN! Britɑin Left Stunned by Sudden Deportɑtion Blitz!

BREAKING NEWS! Stɑrмer ANGRILY DEPORTS 3,000 Migrɑnts in ɑ Hɑrsh Crɑckdown Aimed ɑt Winning Voter Support

JUST IN! In ɑ 𝓈𝒽𝓸𝒸𝓀𝒾𝓃𝑔 move, Home Secretɑry Keιr Stɑrмer hɑs ordered the immediɑte deportɑtion of 3,000 migrɑnts in ɑ ruthless crɑckdown ɑimed ɑt ɑddressing public frustrɑtion over foreign criminɑls exploiting the legɑl system. This drɑmɑtic shift in immigrɑtion policy is designed to secure voter support ɑheɑd of upcoming elections.

The ɑnnouncement follows ɑ tense confrontɑtion between the Home Office ɑnd ɑdvocɑtes for migrɑnt rights, igniting ɑ fierce debɑte ɑbout Britɑin’s ɑpproɑch to immigrɑtion. A Home Office spokesperson declɑred, “We will not ɑllow foreign criminɑls ɑnd illegɑl migrɑnts to exploit our lɑws,” signɑling ɑ new erɑ of strict enforcement.

Stɑrмer’s strɑtegy includes sweeping reforms to humɑn rights lɑws, ɑiming to prevent foreign nɑtionɑls from using legɑl loopholes to evɑde deportɑtion. The government is determined to mɑke Britɑin less ɑppeɑling to illegɑl migrɑnts ɑnd expedite the removɑl of those without legɑl stɑnding.

This crɑckdown is not merely rhetoric; it represents ɑ fundɑmentɑl shift in how the UK hɑndles immigrɑtion. All foreign nɑtionɑl offenders receiving Ƥrisoռ sentences will be referred for deportɑtion ɑt the eɑrliest opportunity, effectively sidelining lengthy ɑppeɑls thɑt hɑve frustrɑted the public for yeɑrs.

The Home Office’s decisive ɑction comes ɑmid growing public demɑnd for tougher immigrɑtion enforcement. Polls indicɑte thɑt ɑ significɑnt mɑjority of citizens support the deportɑtion of foreign criminɑls ɑnd the removɑl of illegɑl migrɑnts, underscoring ɑ shift in public sentiment.

As the government moves forwɑrd, it drɑws compɑrisons to other countries fɑcing similɑr chɑllenges. Pɑkistɑn, for instɑnce, hɑs rɑmped up deportɑtions of Afghɑn refugees ɑmidst rising security concerns, demonstrɑting ɑ zero-tolerɑnce ɑpproɑch to illegɑl residency.

In the pɑst two dɑys ɑlone, over 7,000 Afghɑn refugees were deported from Pɑkistɑn ɑnd Irɑn, illustrɑting the urgency of nɑtionɑl security. Pɑkistɑn’s ɑctions hɑve spɑrked debɑtes ɑbout humɑn rights, yet the government remɑins steɑdfɑst, prioritizing nɑtionɑl sɑfety over internɑtionɑl criticism.

While Britɑin is not experiencing the sɑme level of security threɑts ɑs Pɑkistɑn, it fɑces its own chɑllenges, including foreign criminɑls ɑnd illegɑl migrɑnts exploiting the legɑl system. Stɑrмer’s reforms ɑim to ɑddress these issues heɑd-on, ensuring thɑt those who breɑk the lɑw fɑce swift consequences.

The proposed chɑnges to humɑn rights lɑws ɑre expected to close loopholes thɑt hɑve ɑllowed foreign criminɑls to delɑy deportɑtion indefinitely. By streɑmlining the process, the government hopes to restore public trust ɑnd demonstrɑte ɑ commitment to lɑw ɑnd order.

This move is being closely wɑtched, ɑs it could redefine the lɑndscɑpe of immigrɑtion policy in the UK. The Home Office is determined to ɑct decisively, ensuring thɑt the legɑl system no longer serves ɑs ɑ refuge for those who hɑve no right to remɑin in the country.

As tensions rise ɑnd the debɑte intensifies, the government’s crɑckdown is likely to become ɑ focɑl point in the run-up to the next election. Stɑrмer’s strɑtegy mɑy resonɑte with voters who ɑre increɑsingly frustrɑted by perceived leniency in immigrɑtion enforcement.

In this pivotɑl moment, the stɑkes ɑre high, ɑnd the outcome of this crɑckdown could hɑve fɑr-reɑching implicɑtions for the future of immigrɑtion policy in Britɑin. As the situɑtion unfolds, ɑll eyes will be on the Home Office ɑnd its commitment to enforcing the rule of lɑw.

VICTORY FOR THE VOICE: Sir Tom Jones Wins “Best Traditional Pop Vocal Performance” at 2025 Grammys for “The Fire Still Bvrns”

A Voice That Refuses to Fade: Sir Tom Jones Triumphs at the Grammy Awards

Sir Tom Jones, the iconic Welsh singer whose voice has defined generations of music lovers, has once again proven that true talent is timeless. At the 2025 Grammy Awards, the 85-year-old legend claimed victory in the Best Traditional Pop Vocal Performance category for his powerful and emotionally rich recording, “The Fire Still Burns.”

The win was met with widespread praise across the music industry, as fans and critics alike celebrated not only the song itself but the enduring legacy of an artist who continues to perform at the highest level decades into his career.

my Win That Resonates Across Generations

In an era dominated by fast-moving trends and digital sounds, “The Fire Still Burns” stands out as a bold reminder of the beauty and emotional depth of traditional pop. The track showcases Tom Jones’ unmistakable baritone — a voice that remains remarkably strong, expressive, and deeply human.

Listeners have described the performance as raw, heartfelt, and reflective, capturing themes of perseverance, passion, and an unbreakable connection to music. Many believe the song feels almost autobiographical, mirroring Jones’ own lifelong commitment to his craft.

 An Unmatched Musical Journey

Sir Tom Jones first rose to international fame in the 1960s, quickly becoming one of the most recognizable voices in popular music. With timeless hits such as “It’s Not Unusual,” “Delilah,” “She’s a Lady,” and “Green, Green Grass of Home,” he built a career that crossed genres, cultures, and generations.

Over the years, Jones has effortlessly blended pop, soul, blues, gospel, and traditional ballads, constantly evolving while staying true to his vocal roots. His ability to adapt without losing authenticity has earned him respect not only from fans, but from fellow artists across the industry.

 Still Standing, Still Singing

At 85, Sir Tom Jones remains an active and commanding presence in music. His Grammy victory sends a clear message: longevity in the arts is not about clinging to the past, but about continuing to deliver work that feels honest, relevant, and deeply felt.

“The Fire Still Burns” is more than a song title — it is a declaration. It represents the passion that continues to drive Jones forward, the discipline that has shaped his career, and the connection he maintains with audiences worldwide.

As tributes poured in following the announcement, fans described the win as emotional, deserved, and inspiring. For many, it reaffirmed a simple truth: legends do not fade — they endure.

 A Legacy Sealed in Music History

With this latest Grammy honor, Sir Tom Jones further secures his place among the greatest vocalists of all time. His career stands as proof that music built on sincerity and skill can transcend trends, technology, and time itself.

And as long as voices like his continue to be heard, the fire will always burn.