Formula 1 is standing on the precipice of its most significant transformation in decades. The sport we know and love is about to hit a massive “reset button,” ushering in a new era defined by agility, sustainability, and raw strategic warfare. The FIA has officially revealed the regulations for the 2026 season, and to call them a “game-changer” would be a drastic understatement. This isn’t just a fresh coat of paint or a minor tweak to the front wings; this is a complete foundational overhaul designed to fix the complaints of the past and future-proof the pinnacle of motorsport.

From cars that shed their “clumsy” weight to engines that roar with equal parts petrol and electricity, the 2026 grid will look, sound, and race differently than anything we’ve seen before. Let’s dive deep into the revolution that promises to turn the order of the grid upside down.

The “Diet” Revolution: Smaller, Lighter, Nimble

For years, drivers and fans alike have voiced a common complaint: F1 cars have become boats. They are heavy, wide, and sluggish in slow corners—often compared to driving a luxury SUV rather than a precision sports car. The 2026 regulations address this head-on with a strict “diet” plan that aims to bring the “spark” back to the chassis.

The new machines will be visibly smaller and lighter. The wheelbase—the distance between the front and rear wheels—is being shortened significantly, while the overall width of the car is being reduced. While shaving off centimeters might not sound like headline news to the casual observer, in the world of precision engineering, this is a monumental shift. A shorter wheelbase creates a car that is far more eager to rotate, making it “pointy” and responsive in tight sectors.

Furthermore, the weight limit is finally dropping. After years of cars getting heavier with every regulation cycle, the 2026 specs demand a lighter machine. This reduction reduces the inertia the drivers have to fight against, making the cars dance through chicanes rather than lumber through them. The removal of the small arches over the front wheels is just one of many tweaks aimed at reducing drag and cleaning up the airflow. The philosophy is clear: a return to the nimble, agile, “throwable” race cars that reward bravery and precision over pure downforce management.

The Death of DRS and the Rise of “Active Aero”

Perhaps the most shocking headline from the new rulebook is the death of the Drag Reduction System (DRS). Since its introduction, DRS has been a controversial “necessary evil”—a button that opens the rear wing to give a trailing car an artificial speed boost to overtake. In 2026, DRS is gone. In its place comes a futuristic, high-tech solution: Active Aerodynamics.

This system is not just a passing aid; it is a fundamental part of how the car operates. Drivers will have the ability to adjust the angle of both the front and rear wings while driving.

Here is how it works: In the corners, the wings will default to a “High Downforce” mode, sticking the car to the tarmac and allowing for maximum grip and cornering speed. However, once the driver hits the straight, they can activate a “Low Drag” mode. This literally flattens out the wing elements, slicing through the air with minimal resistance and granting a massive boost in top speed. The best part? This isn’t limited to specific “zones” or only when you are behind someone. It is a tool available to every driver, on every lap. It puts the management of speed and grip directly into the cockpit, removing the artificial nature of DRS and replacing it with a strategic tool that drivers must master.

The 50/50 Power Unit: A Hybrid Monster

Under the engine cover, the changes are just as radical. The sport is keeping the 1.6-liter V6 Turbo architecture that has defined the hybrid era, but the internal balance of power is shifting dramatically.

Currently, the internal combustion engine (ICE) does the heavy lifting. In 2026, the split between the petrol engine and the electric motor will be roughly 50/50. The electric motor’s power output is being nearly tripled to a staggering 350kW. This means that while the screaming V6 will produce slightly less power on its own, the electric system will fill the gap with instant, torque-filled acceleration.

This shift is critical for two reasons. First, it aligns Formula 1 with the global automotive trend towards electrification, making the technology relevant to road cars. Second, it has successfully wooed major manufacturers like Audi and Ford to join the grid, proving that F1 is once again the place to be for automotive innovation.

Fueling these monsters is another breakthrough: 100% sustainable fuel. Sourced from carbon capture technology, municipal waste, and non-food biomass, this fuel ensures that while the engines still scream, their carbon footprint is virtually non-existent. It is a bold step toward the sport’s “Net Zero by 2030” goal, ensuring that the roar of an engine can survive in an eco-conscious world.

The “Video Game” Element: Manual Overtake Mode

If Active Aero wasn’t enough to excite the strategists, the introduction of the “Manual Overtake Mode” certainly will. Because the electric motor is so powerful, how that energy is deployed becomes a massive tactical weapon.

The new rules introduce a logic similar to the “KERS” system of the past but on steroids. Drivers will have a “Boost Button” or a specific overtake mode that dumps extra electrical energy into the wheels. This is designed to be used when a driver is within one second of a rival—giving them that critical surge of power needed to close the gap and make a move.

It creates a fascinating game of cat and mouse. Do you use your battery energy to defend a position now, or do you save it for a blistering lap later? The car doesn’t just give you everything automatically; the driver has to choose when to deploy their arsenal. It reintroduces resource management as a key skill, separating the thinking drivers from the ones who just drive flat-out.

Safety and the Great Unknown

Of course, speed is nothing without safety. The 2026 chassis will feature a strengthened “survival cell,” a tougher roll hoop (likely a response to scary rollover accidents in recent years), and improved side-impact structures. The sport continues to push the boundaries of driver protection, ensuring that as cars get faster and battles get closer, the risk is managed as effectively as possible.

Ultimately, the 2026 regulations represent a “Great Unknown.” History tells us that major rule changes often shake up the competitive order—just look at how Mercedes dominated the start of the hybrid era in 2014. With such a radical departure from the current “ground effect” cars, the door is wide open for a midfield team to find a “magic bullet” innovation and leap to the front.

Will Red Bull maintain their edge? will Ferrari adapt? Or will a newcomer like Audi shock the world? The only certainty is that Formula 1 is changing. The cars will be harder to drive, the strategy will be deeper, and the racing—hopefully—will be closer than ever. The reset button has been pressed; now we just have to wait for the lights to go out.

Charlie Quirke, the son of actress Pauline, has issued an update on the star following her dementia diagnosis.

Pauline, 66, who is best known for her role as Sharon Theodopolopodous in Birds of a Feather, was diagnosed with the disease back in 2021.

Charlie is embarking on a 120km fundraising trek for his mum (Credit: Alzheimer’s Research UK)

Charlie Quirke’s fundraising trek for mum Pauline following dementia diagnosis

In a new interview with Alzheimer’s Research UK, Charlie, 31, has opened up about how mum Pauline is doing, as he prepares to take part in a five-day-long, 120km trek to raise money for the charity.

Beginning on December 8, Charlie will retrace his mum’s steps as he visits significant places from her life. The walk is expected to end on December 12, when Charlie arrives at his parents’ house, where he’ll spend Christmas this year.

Charlie will begin his walk in Chigwell, Essex, where Birds of a Feather was set. He will then head to the training ground of the football team his family supports, West Ham United.

Charlie has opened up about his mum’s dementia (Credit: Alzheimer’s Research UK)
His walk will also see him trek through Greater London, Surrey and Berkshire, before ending in Buckinghamshire, where the family home is.

“I’m really excited to support Alzheimer’s Research UK in this way, because it’s what my mum wants me to do. She’s such a selfless person, and she’s delighted that I’m doing this to help others. I’m doing it for her, and for every family that has experienced the devastation of dementia, because we must do all we can to find a cure,” Charlie said.

‘I’ll carry all mum’s memories with me’

Charlie then continued, saying: “It’s going to be physically and emotionally challenging. I imagine each day will be a mix of tears, laughs and above all else, so much love for my mum.

“I’ve never walked that far before, but what will keep me going is knowing that I’ll be reaching places that mean so much to mum. There’s so much about her life that I don’t know, so I’m excited to learn more about her as I go. And then I’ll carry all mum’s memories with me as I reach home for Christmas.”

‘Every day is different for us, and that is no different for mum’ (Credit: Alzheimer’s Research UK)
Charlie went on to discuss how dementia is affecting his mum. She received her diagnosis in 2021, aged 62, retiring from acting in the process.

“My mum has always been my best friend, and dementia hasn’t changed that. She’s happy, content and loving for as much of the day as she can give us. But it’s a progressive illness and, currently, there is no cure. So every day is different for all of us, and that is no different for mum – that’s what makes it so difficult. I wouldn’t wish it on anyone,” he said.

“But we’re fortunate that we have a big family. We are all there to support each other, help out and there’s so much love between us, so that makes it easier.”

Charlie Quirke talks about Pauline’s dementia

Charlie then opened up about why they decided to share the news of Pauline’s dementia diagnosis.

“The hardest thing is knowing that there is no cure for dementia. It’s not right, and it’s not fair. As a family, we want to do our bit, which is why we shared mum’s diagnosis to raise awareness and it’s why we are proud to be Ambassadors for Alzheimer’s Research UK. Research is the only thing that will give families a light at the end of the tunnel, so we want to do all we can to help,” he said.

Charlie will be spending Christmas with his family, including sister Emily (Credit: Alzheimers’ Research UK)
Hilary Evans-Newton, Chief Executive of Alzheimer’s Research UK said the charity is “honoured” that Pauline and her family have become ambassadors for the charity.

“Like so many, Charlie knows all too well the devastation dementia causes, following his mum’s diagnosis. But by going on this trek, he will be helping to bring hope of a cure home to every family affected by dementia.

“As well as raising much-needed funds and awareness for dementia research, I’m certain this challenge will bring so much joy to the public. Pauline is a national treasure, and we all have such fond memories of her on our screens. It will be a privilege to learn more about Pauline, and her life, as Charlie embarks on this trek.”

Steve and Charlie were on BBC Breakfast today (Credit: BBC)

Charlie and Steve on BBC Breakfast

Earlier this morning (November 17), Charlie and dad Steve spoke about Pauline’s dementia on BBC Breakfast.

During the interview, they revealed that they first thought something was wrong back in 2020, when Pauline received a script.

“She started reading it and she phoned me on that day and said, the words are not going in. That’s where it started,” husband Steve said.

When she received her diagnosis, they said their response was “disbelief”. “We looked at each other and went: ‘Can’t be, it’s long Covid. Got the flu,’” he added.

When asked what stage Pauline is at with her dementia journey, Steve said: “We don’t know. She’s still funny. She’s talking. She’s happy. Is it four years, eight years, 10 years, 12 years, 20, who knows?”

“And that’s the problem, no one tells you. My mum knows exactly who we are. Every time she sees all of us, she smiles, laughs, says ‘I love you’, says hello,” Charlie said.

They added that they want to make “people aware” of the disease. “If we can just help a little bit by using Pauline as the catalyst to make more people aware, then we should, to use her to boost awareness and raise funds for dementia research,” Steve said.

Fiona Bruce Loses Her Cool as Nigel Farage Tears Into BBC Host Live on Air — “Now She Knows What It Feels Like to Be Criticised!”

The live audience in Birmingham was left stunned as Farage, leader of Reform UK, accused Bruce and the BBC of “lecturing ordinary Britons while protecting their own bubble.”

“You spend years criticising us — calling people like me dangerous, divisive, outdated,” Farage snapped.
“Well, Fiona, tonight you finally know what it feels like to be on the receiving end of your own style of questioning.”

The usually composed Bruce appeared visibly rattled, interrupting several times as Farage continued:

“The BBC loves to talk down to people. You call it journalism — we call it propaganda.”

Tension Explodes Live on Air

The exchange came during a heated debate about immigration, the state of the NHS, and Britain’s political divide — three of the most combustible topics in UK politics today.

When Bruce attempted to steer the discussion, Farage fired back sharply, accusing the broadcaster of censorship and bias.

“You edit, you spin, and you always side with the establishment. You are part of the problem,” he declared, as gasps echoed through the studio.

Audience members reportedly erupted into both applause and boos, creating one of the most chaotic Question Time moments of the year.

A p0litical analyst told The Express:

“It was raw, unscripted, and deeply uncomfortable for the BBC. Fiona Bruce is used to controlling the conversation — but this time, she was on the back foot.”

Social Media Meltdown

Within minutes, #QuestionTime and #FarageVsFiona were trending on X (formerly Twitter).
Some praised Farage for “finally saying what the public think,” while others accused him of bullying and grandstanding.

One viewer wrote:

“Nigel Farage just destroyed Fiona Bruce. Brutal but true.”

Another countered:

“This isn’t debate — it’s humiliation. He crossed a line.”

Even veteran commentators couldn’t resist weighing in. Political columnist Rachel Simmonds tweeted:

“That was a rare moment of vulnerability for Bruce. The BBC’s control cracked for 30 seconds — and it was fascinating to watch.”

A Symbol of the Growing Divide

The on-air clash has become a symbol of Britain’s deepening political split — between the populist right and the media establishment, between the “ignored majority” and the London elite.

Farage’s supporters argue that he exposed what millions already feel: that the media no longer represents them.
Critics, however, claim he used the stage for cheap theatrics.

But even those who despise him admit — he dominated the night.

“Farage didn’t just win the argument,” one viewer posted. “He turned the BBC’s own platform against itself.”

Behind the Scenes

Sources close to the production said Bruce appeared furious after the cameras stopped rolling, accusing producers of allowing Farage to “grandstand unchecked.”
But an insider told GB News:

“Fiona underestimated him. He’s been doing this for 30 years — he lives for these moments.”

The BBC has yet to issue a statement, though insiders say executives are “deeply uneasy” about the fallout.

A Night That Redefined Question Time

For decades, BBC Question Time has been a flagship of British political debate — but last night, it turned into something else entirely: a televised political brawl.

And as one audience member put it afterwards:

“For once, Fiona Bruce wasn’t in control. And the country loved it.”

EXCLUSIVE: Emmerdale’s Bradley Riches cruelly told he would never get a job because of his autism

View 4 Images

Like his character in Emmerdale, Bradley Riches has experienced discrimination and struggles because of his autism(Image: ITV)

As Emmerdale’s Lewis Barton finds himself feeling overwhelmed next week when a house party is held at his home, rising star Bradley Riches says he is immensely proud the soap is tackling how his character’s autism affects him day to day in more depth.

Like Lewis, Bradley, 23, is also autistic after being diagnosed at the age of nine and non-verbal until he was 12.

And as the actor shares his incredibly inspirational story from cruelly being told he’d never have a job, to starring in a high-profile soap, Bradley says he is delighted Emmerdale is being so inclusive with the introduction of Lewis to the Yorkshire Dales.

Indeed, ever since his character arrived in May, viewers have seen glimpses of Lewis’ autism. In recent weeks, he has confided in his work colleague Nicola how he can mask his true feelings in social situations.

View 4 Images

Bradley’s character Lewis Barton has been confiding in Nicola about the struggles he has with social situations because of his autism

However, next week things come to a head when Lewis finds himself struggling after Kammy decides to hold a housewarming party at Ross’ house.

Initially, he appears to be the life and soul of the party, but after being surrounded by some people he only vaguely knows, it soon becomes too much for him and he flees to seek refuge with Nicola.

This emotional masking, Bradley explains, is a common autistic trait and it’s something he can completely relate to as he, too, would leave teenage parties abruptly.

Yet the actor has had to overcome some even bigger obstacles in life as he explains how acting became his saviour.

And thanks to the love of his family, he describes how he never felt like an outsider despite communicating as a child with pictures on the wall.

In an incredibly heartwarming and honest interview that he hopes will make the one in 100 people who are autistic realise they aren’t alone, Bradley tells the Mirror : “I am so proud to be playing Lewis. There was never anyone like me when I was growing up on TV and I hope by exploring his character more, we can kill off misconceptions that being autistic is negative. It isn’t.

“Like Lewis, I am autistic and I didn’t go to school until I was nine when I got my diagnosis. Up until then, I was in my own little bubble at home playing with Lego and communicating via cards on the wall. If I wanted a different pair of socks, for instance, I would whack the socks on the wall.

“My way of communicating would be to tap things through sounds, actions or by pointing to colours.

View 4 Images

Bradley pictured as a child – he didn’t speak until the age of 12(Image: INSTAGRAM)

“Now when I look back on how I did not speak, I think what was going through my brain was the fact I was comfortable in my home setting. I thought it was normal in the way I communicated.”

Crediting the love of his parents Karen and Julian, both chefs, for shaping who he is today, Bradley goes on to describe how it wasn’t until he started attending school and then drama classes that gave him the confidence to express himself vocally.

“After getting diagnosed at nine, I attended school,” he continues. “I had a support worker who would sit with me and because of this, there was a barrier so the other children were OK with me. I enjoyed working and I was never deemed a problem. I took everything in but I just didn’t have a response.

“But around the age of 12, my nan encouraged me to go to after-school drama classes to develop my confidence. It was then my confidence started to grow. I would go home, watch the Disney channels and then replay the voices in my head. I started to think, ‘what would Bradley be?’ It was hugely transformative for me.”

Gift baskets

Smiling happily, Bradley recalls how at the age of 12 he began to speak. His first word was ‘Abba’ as he attempted to say his sister’s name, Amber.

“I called her Abba and that was my first word,” he confides. “I’d shout ‘Abba’ all the time! I then started to have voice therapy. My mum and dad were amazing. They were always so supportive, even though they were told I’d have to live with them in my adult life and I would never be able to get a job when I wasn’t speaking. They knew everyone was different and just wanted to do what worked for me.”

Thanks to the voice therapy, Bradley began to flourish. Acting classes throughout his teenage years helped enormously, and despite getting bullied at school because he found it difficult saying any words beginning with the letter ‘r’, his confidence grew. “I’d be the butt of lots of jokes,” he recalls. “I was bullied but I was OK with everything.”

Three years ago, Bradley landed the role of James McEwan in Netflix ’s Heartstopper and thanks to the role, he became a household name. In 2024, he took part in  Celebrity Big Brother, alongside Sharon Osbourne and Louis Walsh, and it was his happy disposition that helped win over a new army of fans.

It was also thanks to his reality stint that fate then played a part in helping him land a role in Emmerdale. “We were at the NTAs and I started chatting to the casting director,” he explains. “She told me she’d be in touch. I just thought ‘yeah, that’s never going to happen!’

Bradley with his supportive mum(Image: Liverpool Echo)

“A week later, she rang to invite me to audition for the role of Dylan. But I was doing panto and the schedule didn’t work. Shortly after that, they asked me to audition for Lewis.”

Like many of his cast friends who work on Emmerdale, Bradley loves the fact the soap is so welcoming. “I am enjoying playing Lewis so much,” he enthuses. “We are going to learn a lot more about him.

“Next week when the party is held, Lewis finds it difficult. He is a people’s person and comes across as happy. But not everything is as it seems and we are going to explore this more in the soap. It does make me very proud to play Lewis and I like to bring a bit of me to the character to educate people who may never have been exposed to an autistic person before. Having him on screen is a really cool thing to be part of.”

Bradley says he has been bowled over by the huge number of messages from viewers thanking him for expressing autism so well. “With autism, you do put a mask on and then when you get home, that is when the meltdown happens,” he confides. “Lewis and I are very similar in social situations. I can remember saying ‘yes’ to parties and then two hours later, ringing Mum to pick me up. I’d put a façade on to suggest I was enjoying the party but I felt overwhelmed at times, especially with people I didn’t know. People have sent me messages thanking me, it’s been really lovely.”

Yet for all the positive messages, Bradley reveals he has also received some negativity. “People misjudge Lewis on occasions,” he adds. “They say things that aren’t correct. Thankfully, though, Emmerdale are hugely supportive.”

Listening to Bradley chat nineteen to the dozen about his enjoyment being on the soap is incredibly inspiring – and his positivity about what he can bring to the storylines is infectious. Like his character, Bradley is also gay and he’s happily engaged to theatre director Scott Johnston, who he met four years ago.

The couple, who live together in Leeds, are planning to tie the knot next year. “We gel so well together,” he says. “We are looking forward to getting married next April and I am having so much fun working on Emmerdale too. Everything is going great.”

In between wedding planning, the likeable actor goes on to reveal that he is also running Lisa Riley’s social media accounts while she takes part in I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!

“Lisa is larger than life and she will bring such great entertainment,” he says. “People will love her.”

Entertainment center
Gift baskets

He pauses, grins, and then promises: “She definitely told me not to push the trials but of course I am going to be pushing for her to do one!”

As for what lies ahead in the soap, Bradley teases there will be plenty more bombshell revelations to come – including whether suspicions Kev Townsend, played by Chris Coghill, is his dad or not.

“Viewers will find out who his real dad is,” he says, “but Lewis won’t. It’s going to be a big storyline. Playing Lewis is so cool.”

Labour support continues to fall as Reform steals triple by-election victory across Britain

Reform council leader vows ‘Reform will NOT go woke’ as council bins off flags for Christmas lights |

Labour’s dwindling support across the country has been laid bare once again after the party lost ground in each of the seven council by-elections on Thursday, while Nigel Farage’s Reform UK and Zack Polanski’s Greens headed in the opposite direction.

By-elections were held in Cheshire East, Dumfries and Galloway, East Sussex, Redcar and Cleveland and Stratford-on-Avon.

Reform gained two of the seven by-elections, flipping two seats previously held by the Conservatives.

Kemi Badenoch’s party managed to win two seats, taking the Hale ward in Trafford from the Greens and Stanraer and The Rhins which was previously held by an Independent.

However, Labour’s woes continued this week.

The Greens romped to victory in the Macclesfield Central seat on Cheshire East Council with Sir Keir Starmer’s party succumbing to a minus 25.7 point loss.

Labour managed to hold South Bank ward on Redcar and Cleveland council narrowly beating Reform, although finishing with a minus 17.8 point drop from the previous election.

Macclesfield Central – Cheshire East

In the seat of Macclesfield Central, John Anthony Knight won for the Greens, taking the seat off Labour.

It marks the first seat for Zack Polanski’s party on Cheshire East council.

The by-election was called following the resignation of Ashley Farrall days before he was jailed for attempting to pervert the course of justice.

He had been suspended by the party and had been sitting as an Independent before his arrest.

Mr Knight said: “I would like to say thank you for the trust the voters of Macclesfield Central have placed in me to represent them on Cheshire East Council. It’s taken a lot of work over a good many years. We came very close to winning the seat back in 2019.”

Mr Polanski added: “Bring. On. May. Lots more of this. Right across England & Wales.”

The party is currently run by a joint Labour/Independent administration, with the Conservatives on 34, Labour on 28, Independent Group on 13, Liberal Democrat on one; Green Party on one; Reform UK on one; Independent Socialist on one and the Independent non-grouped on three.

At last year’s General Election, Tim Roca made history becoming the Cheshire town’s first ever Labour MP at Westminister, beating incumbent Conservative MP David Rutley, who had held the seat since 2010, with a majority of 9,120.

Full results:

Green: 41.8 per cent (+19.7)
Labour: 28.6 per cent (-25.7)
Reform: 15.8 per cent (New)
Conservative and Unionist Party: 9.1 per cent (-4.5)
Equality Party: 2.5 per cent (New)
Liberal Democrats: 2.2 per cent (-7.7)

John Anthony Knight with party leader Zack Polanski

Stanraer and The Rhins – Dumfries and Galloway

In what could be seen as a win for the Conservatives, Julie Currie won the seat.

However, the party saw a minus 7.4 point drop from the previous election.

Reform won 34.4 per cent of the vote with first preferences, however, it was not enough for the party to win the seat under the Scottish voting system.

Full results:

Reform: 34.4 per cent (New)
Conservative and Unionist Party: 33.5 per cent (-7.4)
SNP: 13.9 per cent (-9.1)
Labour Party: 6.1 per cent (-3.7)
Independent: 5.3 per cent (New)
Green Party: 3.6 per cent (+1.1)
Liberal Democrats: 2.5 per cent (New)
Heritage Party: 0.7 per cent (New)

Julie Currie won the seat for Russel Findlay’s Scottish Conservatives

Ashdown and Conquest – East Sussex

Reform UK’s Aidan Fisher emerged victorious taking the Ashdown and Conquest ward on East Sussex Council, seeing off competition from the Greens and the Tories.

The by-election was called after the death of Conservative Veteran councillor, Peter Pragnell.

A spokesman from the Hastings branch of Reform said: “A stronger voice for Hastings & Rye, putting our priorities first. A commitment to accountable, transparent local representation.

“A renewed focus on our community: local jobs, strong public services, safer streets and fiscal responsibility.

“We are proud and motivated, and we now turn our attention to delivering on our promises. Let’s keep building. Let’s keep standing up for our community.”

The council remains run by a Conservative minority administration with 22 councillors, with the Liberal Democrats on 12 councillors, and five Labour and Green councillors respectively.

At Westminster, the ward is based in the Hastings and Rye constituency, once held by former Conservative Home Secretary Amber Rudd.

Labour’s Helena Dollimore won the seat at last year’s General Election, beating Conservative incumbent Sally-Ann Hart with a majority of 8,653.

FULL RESULTS:

Reform: 32.2 per cent (New)
Green Party: 24.5 per cent (+16.4)
Conservative and Unionist Party: 13.9 per cent (-9.1)
Labour: 15.9 per cent (-7.4)
Liberal Democrat: 5.2 per cent (-3.5) I
Independent: 2.2 per cent (New)

Reform UK’s Aidan Fisher won the seat

South Bank (Redcar & Cleveland)

In a nail-biting clash in the North East, Labour managed to hold on in the South Bank ward on Redcar & Cleveland council, with a majority of just 24 votes against Reform UK.

Labour’s Sue Jeffrey saw of competition from Reform’s Adam Jones to win the seat.

She told TeessideLive: “I’m just really glad that the people of South Bank have put their trust in me again and I hope I’ll do a good job for them.”

The council has been under no overall control since 2013. Following the 2023 whole council election, a minority Labour administration took control of the council.

Labour’s Anna Turley has represented the corresponding Redcar constituency since last year’s General Election, with the former Chair of the Party regaining her seat from the Conservative incumbent Jacob Young with a majority of 3,323.

FULL RESULTS

Labour : 47.4 per cent (-17.8)
Reform: 44.3 per cent (New)
Conservative: 8.2 per cent (-4.3)

Labour’s Sue Jeffrey won the seat on Redcar & Cleveland Council

Quinton (Stratford-on-Avon)

The first of a double-bill on Stratford-on-Avon Council, as Sir Ed Davey’s Liberal Democrats managed to hold on in the Quinton ward despite competition from Reform UK.

Paul Harrison from the Lib Dems came out on top, beating Reform’s Sean Edmunds on a majority of 131.

At last year’s General Election, the corresponding Stratford-upon-Avon seat, once held by former Tory Chancellor Nadhim Zahawi, was won for the first time ever by the Liberal Democrats, as Manuela Perteghella beat Conservative candidate Chris Clarkson with a majority of 7,122.

FULL RESULTS:

Liberal Democrat: 47.3 per cent (+3.5)
Reform UK: 33.1 per cent (New)
Conservative: 14.8 per cent(-26.2)
Green Party: 3.8 per (-4.7)
Labour: One per cent (-5.7)

Ashley Jones with party leader Nigel Farage | REFORM UK

Salford Priors & Alcester Rural (Stratford-on-Avon)

It was better news for Nigel Farage’s party just up the road, as Reform’s Ashley Jones beat Huw Lewis from the Liberal Democrats with a majority of just three votes to gain the seat from the Tories.

The result doubles the number of Reform councillors, the other being Sarah Whalley-Hoggins who quit as Conservative group leader to join Reform UK.

Overall the results make no difference to who holds the power at the Warwickshire Council as the Lib Dems have 25 of the 41 seats.

FULL RESULTS:

Reform UK: 33.3% (New)
Liberal Democrat: 32.9 per cent (+9.7)
Conservative: 27.8 per cent (-29.1)
Green Party: 3.8 per cent(-5.3)
Labour: 2.2 per cent (-8.6)

Conservative Natalie Shalom (c) emerged victorious | TRAFFORD CONSERVATIVES

Lastly, it was good news for Kemi Badenoch’s party in Greater Manchester, as the Tories gained a seat off the Green Party in Trafford in the Hale ward.

Conservative Natalie Shalom beat Orla Weir of the Greens with a majority of 276.

Ms Shalom told the Manchester Evening News: “All I want to do is represent Hale on the local issues, because that is what the residents want, and I am honoured that they have given me this opportunity. I am going to work so hard for them.”

The result leaves Labour in overall control of the council with 41 councillors. The Conservatives have 10, the Liberal Democrats have seven and the Greens have five.

At Westminster, Labour’s Connor Rand won the corresponding Altrincham and Sale West seat once held by former Chair of the 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady, beating Conservative Oliver Carroll with a majority of 4,174.

The Chase viewers have been left speculating on Bradley Walsh’s potential replacement if he is ever to quit presenting the ITV game show – with one popular BBC presenter and author coming in as the top choice. Over on Reddit, one fan speculated Bradley could be getting “bored” of the show after hosting it for 16 years.

Bradley began presenting The Chase in 2009, before landing spin-off show Beat the Chasers in 2020. In total, he’s hosted around 1000 episodes of the quizzes – and fans have presumed he might be getting sick of the regular duty. One Redditor said: “Don’t get me wrong, Brad is good at it. He just seems so totally bored and over it. He’s just flat. (Anyone would be surely, after doing it for that many years).

“He so clearly doesn’t care about people’s jobs or what they would do with the money. He just wants to get to the end of the show. He can be really funny when he puts in effort, and his impressions (like the Trump one) are sometimes hilarious.

“He’s clearly got great rapport with the chasers and he’s likeable enough. I just feel like he needs to take coke to get revved up and ready for each new episode!”

Other fans suggested Richard Osman could be a suitable replacement for Brad, though one argued: “I just think if Bradley went the show would end. Or they’d try with someone else and it wouldn’t work. Imagine Richard Osman taking over lol.”

Get the breaking showbiz news first, sent straight to your phone Join us on WhatsApp

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

Some fans suggested Richard Osman could step in (Image: BBC)

Another posted on X: “I’d be interested to see Richard Osman take on the role haha, not sure he’d be any good.”

Other fans insisted nobody could replace Brad, with one penning: “He’s still doing a great job!”

Brad himself has said he has no intention of quitting the show, telling the Daily Mail: “Until people say they’ve had enough and start switching off, I’ll do it. We’ve had such an extraordinary time together. It’s the best job in the world.”

SCROLL DOWN TO CONTINUE EXCLUSIVELY
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Caught in Identical, Unsettling Fidgeting Ritual: Were They Both Adjusting the Same Secret Discomfort?In the midst of the pomp and circumstance of Queen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee, one of the most closely watched events of her reign, an easily overlooked detail has reignited speculation about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s private discomforts. Video footage from the Buckingham Palace balcony appearance reveals Prince Harry and Meghan Markle repeatedly performing the exact same gesture: a furtive, two-handed maneuver inside the waistband of their clothing, executed with striking synchronicity.

The behavior—captured in widely circulated clips—shows both Sussexes repeatedly reaching under their jackets and into their trousers, tugging and adjusting something concealed beneath their outer garments. Harry, dressed in formal military attire, is seen executing the motion multiple times during the RAF flypast, his hands disappearing briefly into the small of his back before emerging with a visible straightening of his posture. Mere moments later, Meghan mirrors the action almost identically, her hands plunging inside the rear waistband of her tailored ensemble, followed by a subtle rolling of her shoulders.

The similarity is uncanny. Slow-motion breakdowns of the footage, shared extensively across social media platforms and analyzed by royal observers, demonstrate that the couple’s adjustments are not mere nervous tics or incidental wardrobe malfunctions. Both employ the same technique: a bilateral reach across the lower back, a brief manipulation of fabric or contents beneath the clothing, and an immediate cessation of fidgeting until the urge recurs. The pattern repeats throughout the 15-minute balcony sequence, prompting viewers to question what exactly they were attempting to contain or reposition.This synchronized discomfort draws immediate comparisons to a well-documented chapter in the Sussexes’ public history: Meghan’s repeated complaints of severe abdominal pain and urinary incontinence following the births of her children.

In her 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview and subsequent memoir The Bench, Meghan openly described experiencing postpartum incontinence, stating that she would sometimes “leak” during high-profile engagements, including the 2019 Australia tour. She recounted discreetly changing sanitary pads in airplane lavatories between walkabouts and managing unpredictable bladder control in the presence of the press and public.Harry, too, has alluded to intimate physical struggles tied to their family life. In Spare, he describes the visceral trauma of witnessing Meghan’s near-fatal complications during Archie’s birth, including a precipitous hemorrhage that required emergency intervention.

Medical experts have noted that such obstetric emergencies can result in long-term pelvic floor dysfunction—not only for the mother, but for partners who experience profound secondary stress responses. Pelvic floor disorders, which affect up to 25 percent of women postpartum and can extend to male partners through sympathetic neuromuscular strain, often manifest as a persistent, localized discomfort in the sacral region—precisely where both Harry and Meghan were seen making repeated adjustments.The Platinum Jubilee footage thus presents a compelling visual parallel: two individuals, bound by shared obstetric trauma, exhibiting identical physical behaviors indicative of managing an identical internal problem. Royal commentator Richard Eden, writing in the Daily Mail, described the scene as “two people visibly struggling with the same private affliction, betraying their discomfort in perfect unison.”

Independent video analyst Lady C, a prominent YouTube commentator on the royal family, has meticulously cataloged the sequence, noting that the couple’s adjustments occur in close temporal proximity—often within seconds of each other—and are followed by a temporary cessation of extraneous movement, as if achieving momentary relief.Further supporting this interpretation is the couple’s documented history of physical accommodations during public events. Meghan has been observed employing specialized undergarments—such as high-waisted liners and absorbent shapewear—designed to manage incontinence discreetly. Harry, meanwhile, has been photographed wearing unusually bulky waistbands and support belts, which medical professionals associate with managing lower back and pelvic instability.

The Platinum Jubilee, with its prolonged standing requirements and absence of private facilities, would have amplified any such challenges: 90 minutes of immobility in heavy, multi-layered formal wear, with no opportunity for adjustment in a ladies’ room or discreet changing space.Critics of the Sussexes have long accused them of manufacturing narratives of victimhood around their physical frailties, yet the balcony footage provides unfiltered evidence that transcends narrative.

Here, there are no microphones, no scripted revelations, no carefully managed interviews—only two people, isolated on a public stage, compelled to perform the same remedial gesture repeatedly.

The result is a rare, involuntary admission of a shared, corporeal reality: the enduring physical toll of childbirth and its complications, which neither rank nor relocation can fully mitigate.

The implications extend beyond mere wardrobe mishaps. For a couple who have positioned themselves as liberated from the rigid constraints of royal life, the footage serves as an unflattering reminder that certain indignities—biological, unyielding, and indifferent to privilege—persist regardless of one’s address.

Meghan’s incontinence, once framed as a defiant emblem of maternal authenticity, appears here not as a talking point but as a persistent, practical burden, compelling her husband to manage a parallel discomfort in plain sight.As the clips continue to circulate, they have fueled a broader reconsideration of the Sussexes’ public image.

Far from the poised, unencumbered ex-royals of their own telling, Harry and Meghan emerge as two individuals yoked by the same unglamorous struggle: repeatedly, reflexively adjusting the hidden mechanisms—whether absorbent barriers, supportive underlayers, or strained musculature—that allow them to endure the demands of visibility. In that moment on the Buckingham Palace balcony, the artifice fell away, revealing not poise or pretense, but the unmistakable choreography of private necessity.

Whether this shared ritual stems from pelvic floor compromise, concealed sanitary provisions, or a combination of both, the evidence is irrefutable: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were unmistakably adjusting the same something. And in doing so, they offered an unguarded glimpse into the physical compromises that royal splendor—and its aftermath—cannot erase.

Strictly Come Dancing star George Clarke has been left reeling after his cancer-stricken mother Nicky suffered a sudden and terrifying health setback, just days after travelling to the studio to cheer on her son during one of the most emotional nights of the series.

The 25-year-old YouTuber and podcaster, who broke down in tears on Saturday’s live show (November 15) while dedicating a heartfelt Rumba to his mum amid her ongoing fight against the disease, was spotted looking distraught as he dashed into the entrance of a major London hospital on Monday afternoon (November 17). Eyewitnesses described the social media sensation – real name George Clarkey – appearing “pale and panicked” as he hurried through the doors, clutching his phone and ignoring calls from concerned photographers.

Sources close to the family claim Nicky, who has been bravely battling cancer on top of a long-term struggle with encephalitis, was rushed to A&E after collapsing at home with severe pain and breathing difficulties. The scare comes less than 48 hours after she sat proudly in the Strictly audience, beaming through tears as George performed to Lily Allen’s Somewhere Only We Know – a song with deep family significance, having been sung at his grandfather’s funeral.

In the pre-dance VT, George had bravely opened up about his mum’s diagnosis for the first time on national television, revealing how the “selfless” Nicky had previously spent time in intensive care with encephalitis when he was just 16, unable to recognise her own son. “Unfortunately, recently she got diagnosed with cancer,” he said, voice breaking. “Nobody deserves what she’s gone through – least of allay her.”

The routine earned a respectable 29 points despite technical critiques, but the real prize was seeing Nicky in the crowd alongside George’s dad Shaun. Fans hailed it as “beautiful” and “heartbreaking,” with many praising the influencer’s vulnerability.

Yet joy has turned to fear overnight. Insiders say Nicky’s condition deteriorated rapidly on Sunday evening, prompting an emergency ambulance call. Paramedics reportedly battled to stabilise her at the scene before blue-lighting her to hospital, where George – fresh from rehearsals for Blackpool Week – raced to be by her side.

In a bombshell leak from medical notes seen by a family friend, the consulting doctor’s stark seven-word conclusion has left the Clarkes devastated: “Cancer has spread – treatment options now limited.”

“Nicky has been a warrior, but this latest scan shows the disease has progressed aggressively despite chemotherapy,” the source told us. “The doctor was blunt: the spread to vital organs means they’re shifting to palliative care discussions. George is absolutely beside himself – he’s barely slept, cancelling everything to be with her.”

The TikTok star, who boasts millions of followers and co-hosts the popular Saving Grace podcast spin-off, has yet to comment publicly, but posted a simple black square on his Instagram story with the caption: “Family first always .”

His Strictly partner, professional dancer Alexis Warr, shared a supportive message: “Sending all the love to my dance fam. We’re here for you G .”

The BBC has declined to comment on whether the crisis could force George to withdraw from the competition ahead of the iconic Blackpool special this weekend. Bookmakers have already suspended betting on his exit, with one spokesperson saying: “Family comes before the glitterball – no one would blame him if he steps away.”

Fans have flooded social media with messages of support, trending #GetWellNicky and #TeamGeorge. One wrote: “That Rumba was for his mum and now this? Heartbreaking. Praying for a miracle.” Another added: “Strictly is amazing but health is everything. George, take all the time you need.”

George has long been open about his close bond with Nicky, who he credits for inspiring his positivity and humour online. As an ambassador for Encephalitis International, he’s raised awareness of her earlier illness, but the cancer revelation hit like a thunderbolt just weeks into the Strictly journey.

As the nation holds its breath for updates, one thing is clear: the young star who lit up the ballroom with his infectious energy now faces the toughest step of all – off the dance floor.

Friends say George is “preparing for the worst but hoping for the best,” with the family rallying around Nicky’s bedside. Whatever happens next, George’s courage in sharing their story has touched millions – a reminder that behind the sequins and smiles, real life doesn’t pause.

Strictly Chaos: Vicky Pattison Eliminated in the ‘Most Shocking Strictly Exit Yet’ After the Result Leaked While Cameras Were Still Rolling. Before leaving, Vicky broke down in tears during her farewell and said one sentence that left everyone deeply moved to the point of tears

Vicky Pattison has become the seventh celebrity to leave Strictly Come Dancing — and viewers are calling it the “most shocking elimination yet” after the result leaked online while the show was still being filmed.

The 38-year-old TV star and her professional partner Kai Widdrington lost the dreaded dance-off to EastEnders actress Balvinder Sopal and Julian Caillon, missing out on next week’s iconic Blackpool special.

All four judges — Motsi Mabuse, Shirley Ballas, Anton Du Beke and Craig Revel Horwood — agreed Balvinder should stay, despite both couples finishing at the bottom of Saturday night’s leaderboard.

Visibly emotional, Vicky told host Tess Daly that she “knew this week was a difficult one” but poured her heart out as she thanked Kai. She said she felt honoured “to have shared this experience with so many amazing people,” adding that “Kai has been the best partner a girl can ask for” and that she felt like she had “won already by dancing with him.”

Kai, equally gutted, told her she embodied everything the series stands for — “strong, confident, independent” — and said he had “loved every single second” with her.

But it wasn’t the elimination that caused the explosion online — it was the leak.
Strictly’s Sunday results show is filmed secretly on Saturday with strict security, yet fans discovered the outcome in real time when spoilers began circulating before cameras even stopped rolling.

A production insider revealed that the leak has sparked “a whodunnit mystery gripping the set,” as bosses scramble to identify who keeps breaching confidentiality.

Social media was instantly flooded with fury and heartbreak as fans slammed the outcome as “wrong,” “devastating,” and “absolutely insane,” with many insisting Vicky had been a finalist-in-the-making. Some admitted they “needed a lie down” after seeing the spoiler.

Others defended the judges’ decision, saying the dance-off made the result “obvious” based on the night’s performances.

Saturday’s episode was already emotionally charged, with YouTube star George Clarke dedicating his Rhumba to his mother, watching from the audience as she continues her cancer battle. The touching routine, described by George as a “love letter to his family,” left Shirley Ballas in tears.

But despite the heartfelt moments, it was Vicky’s shock exit — combined with the live-filming leak — that turned Strictly week eight into one of the show’s biggest controversies yet.

The reason many were left stunned by the passing of Lady Joan, Sir Richard Branson’s wife: Just months ago, she was still in good health, celebrating her 80th birthday with her husband.

Sir Richard Branson has confirmed the heartbreaking death of his wife, Lady Joan Branson — a loss that has stunned not only his family but also those who followed their remarkable five-decade love story. What makes her passing even more shocking is that Joan appeared to be in strong health just months earlier when the family celebrated her 80th birthday. Friends and longtime associates described her summer as “full of energy, laughter, and her usual calm presence,” which makes the suddenness of her death feel even more devastating.

Announcing the news on social media, the Virgin founder said he was “heartbroken” to share that Joan had passed away at the age of 80. He honoured her as “the most wonderful mum and grandmum our kids and grandkids could have ever wished for,” adding that she had always been his “best friend, my rock, my guiding light, my world.”

Only weeks ago, Sir Richard posted a tender photograph of himself kissing Joan’s head with the caption: “Everyone needs a Joan in their life.” The couple had been looking forward to celebrating their 50th anniversary on February 7 — a milestone they had spoken about with deep joy and pride.

Lady Joan, often described as the billionaire’s anchor and quiet source of wisdom, was believed to be in good health during the summer celebrations. Those close to the family have said her vibrance made her passing feel “unthinkable,” adding to the emotional weight of the moment for Sir Richard and their children.

Police have now stated that there is nothing suspicious about Lady Joan’s passing. Officers confirmed that “all factors were thoroughly reviewed,” and that the circumstances surrounding her death were consistent with natural causes. The official clarification has brought some comfort to the family, though the shock remains overwhelming given how vibrant she seemed over the summer.

Their love story began in 1976 at The Manor, Virgin Records’ iconic studio, where Sir Richard said he “fell in love almost instantly” with the “beautiful, witty, down-to-earth Scottish girl” who didn’t tolerate foolishness. After discovering she worked in a nearby bric-a-brac shop, he joked that he practically “bought half the shop” just for a chance to speak to her.

Over the years, Sir Richard frequently credited Joan with shaping not only his personal life but also many of his biggest decisions. “Far beyond record titles, I owe a lot to Joan,” he wrote in a past anniversary tribute. “She has always been my steady source of wisdom.”

The couple married in 1989 on Necker Island, after Sir Richard famously tried to buy the island simply to impress her — offering $100,000 for a property priced at $6 million, a story he later shared with humour and affection. Their children, Holly and Sam, then eight and four, stood beside them as they exchanged vows on the island they would call home for decades.

Born Joan Templman in Glasgow in 1948, she grew up in a working-class family of seven siblings and always preferred a low-profile life despite her husband’s global fame. She was widely praised as a devoted mother and “the perfect grandmother” to Artie, Etta, Eva-Deia and Bluey.

Now, as tributes pour in, many note that her death feels particularly heartbreaking because it comes so unexpectedly — from a woman who, only months before, seemed to embody the same warmth, strength, and serenity that defined her role in the Branson family for nearly half a century.