‘This is not going to end well and I am here for it’
Former This Morning host Fern Britton seemingly threw shade just minutes before she and her ex-husband Phil Vickery found themselves in an “awkward” TV ‘reunion’.
During Tuesday’s Lorraine (July 15), Fern appeared on the daytime TV programme to promote her book, A Cornish Legacy, and her new TV show, Inside The Vets.
Fern appeared on Lorraine to promote her book (Credit: ITV)
Fern Britton and Phil Vickery in unexpected TV ‘reunion’
Fern’s latest novel focuses on character Cordelia Jago, who thinks very highly of her friendships and her aunt.
In her interview with Lorraine Kelly, Fern said: “The curious thing about getting older, you think you’re not going to make any new friends, yet new friends do keep coming.
“You must recognise that, I’m all into this repowering, not being empowered, but repowering, the power you had in yourself when you were young, into this older person who has little responsibilities now, we don’t have to get up and do the school run. We don’t have to do anything like that.”
She added: “She’s gradually empowered herself, distrusting of men, doesn’t want anything… This is kind of write what you know…”
Lorraine began to laugh to herself as Fern stated: “And a nice person does turn up.”
Enter Phil…
However, things took an awkward turn when Lorraine, minutes later, spoke to This Morning hosts Cat Deeley and Ben Shephard about what was to come on Tuesday’s show.
After Cat revealed This Morning would be continuing its cosmetic cowboy investigation, Ben revealed Fern’s ex was also on the programme.
“Phil is in the kitchen with some ultimate delicious summer salads!” he said.
The chef then appeared on screen, smiling awkwardly inside the studio kitchen.
Phil appeared on This Morning straight after Lorraine (Credit: ITV)
‘This is not going to end well’
Naturally, viewers reacted online to the “awkward” situation.
“That link from Fern to Phil (her ex) wasn’t awkward at all #ThisMorning #Lorraine,” one user wrote on X.
“Awkward #lorraine,” another person shared.
Phil Vickery on This Morning and Fern Britton on Lorraine, both in the same building, ITV scrambling for security now in case we have a domestic between them.
“Oh dear, that was a bit awkward, Phil Vickery on This Morning and Fern Britton on Lorraine, both in the same building, ITV scrambling for security now in case we have a domestic between them, two people that can’t stand each other, this is not going to end well, I am here 4 it #ThisMorning,” a third remarked.
Phil and Fern tied the knot in 2000 but suddenly split in 2020. In a recent interview, Fern revealed she and her ex are not on speaking terms.
Fern has three children from her previous marriage to television executive Clive Jones – twins Harry and Jack and daughter Grace. Phil Vickery acted as a stepfather to them. She also shares daughter Winnie, 23, with Phil.
MasterChef host John Torode has reacted to the news he has been axed as presenter of the show after 20 years.
The news of his sacking came earlier today, after it was reported that John was asked to resign from MasterChef after he was accused of racism. Now, he has claimed that neither the BBC or Banijay, which makes the show, have been in touch to deliver the news.
MasterChef star John, 59, issued a statement on Instagram this morning, denying the racism allegations. However, following Gregg Wallace‘s axing, the BBC confirmed that John’s contract wouldn’t be renewed.
Early evening, John shared a new statement…
John was asked to quit (Credit: ITV)
John Torode dragged into MasterChef drama with Gregg Wallace
Over the past few months, Gregg Wallace has come under fire amid allegations of inappropriate behaviour and language. Banijay, the production company behind MasterChef, launched a probe.
Last week, it was announced that Gregg had been sacked from the show. In an update, many shocking findings have been revealed from the report. 45 of the allegations, that span a period between 2005 and 2024, were upheld.
The report also upheld a complaint that an unnamed person used a racial phrase once several years ago. John Torode has since confirmed to The Sun, and on Instagram, that the unnamed person was, in fact, him.
A source said: “He was at drinks after filming when he is alleged to have used an inappropriate racial term. The witness said he apologised instantly, and he was mortified. The witness even stated he didn’t use the term as a slur.
“No one complained at the time, but it’s been brought up during the inquiry. Shockingly, he was only made aware of the incident two weeks ago and was only informed on Friday that it would be upheld,” they then said.
What did John Torode say?
The Sun has also claimed that the BBC and Banijay asked John to resign over the weekend. They also allegedly told MasterChef star John Torode to pretend he had mental health issues after being accused of racism. However, he refused.
“They ambushed him, and it was suggested he quit due to the stress and scrutiny of the furore around the show. Obviously he was absolutely shocked and appalled and told them quite firmly he didn’t have any mental health issues. To try to use mental health as a get-out clause seems incredibly low — and is also deeply unfair to those with genuine mental health trauma,” they said.
They went on to say that John “loves” his job and doesn’t want to lose it because of an investigation into his co-star.
Now, the BBC has revealed that John has been axed.
BBC axe statement in full
In a statement released this afternoon (July 15), a spokesperson said: “John Torode has identified himself as having an upheld allegation of using racist language against him.
“This allegation – which involves an extremely offensive racist term being used in the workplace – was investigated and substantiated by the independent investigation led by the law firm, Lewis Silkin.
“John Torode denies the allegation. He has stated he has no recollection of the alleged incident and does not believe that it happened. He also says that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment.”
Crucially, it then added: “The BBC takes this upheld finding extremely seriously. We will not tolerate racist language of any kind.
“And, as we have already said, we told Banijay UK, the makers of MasterChef, that action must be taken.
“John Torode’s contract on MasterChef will not be renewed,” the statement concluded.
John’s statement
Posting on Instagram, John said: “Although I haven’t heard from anyone at the BBC or Banijay – I am seeing and reading that I’ve been ‘sacked’ from MasterChef and I repeat that I have no recollection of what I’m accused of. The enquiry could not even state the date or year of when I am meant to have said something wrong.
“I’d hoped that I’d have some say in my exit from a show I’ve worked on since its relaunch in 2005, but events in last few days seem to have prevented that. Over the past few months I’ve been considering my life and the shape of it now and in the future.
“Celebrity MasterChef, which I recently filmed with Grace Dent along with the two fantastic Christmas specials, will be my last. Personally, I have loved every minute working on MasterChef, but it’s time to pass the cutlery to someone else. For whoever takes over, love it as I have.
“I will watch fondly from afar as I now focus on the many other projects I have been working towards. My tummy will be grateful for a rest after 20 years of eating, but what a joy it has been. Life is ever-changing and ever-moving and sometimes personal happiness and fulfilment lay elsewhere.
“Thank you for the many years of MasterChef. John Torode.”
‘I do not believe it happened’
In a statement on Instagram last night (Monday, July 14), John confirmed he was the person accused of saying a racial phrase. However, he claimed he does not “believe it happened”.
“Following publication of the Executive Summary of the Investigation into Gregg Wallace while working on MasterChef, I am aware of speculation that I am one of the two other individuals against whom an allegation has been upheld,” he wrote.
“For the sake of transparency, I confirm that I am the individual who is alleged to have used racial language on one occasion,” he then continued.
MasterChef star John Torode has spoken out (Credit: BBC)
‘I would never wish to cause offence’
The statement then continued.
“The allegation is that I did so sometime in 2018 or 2019, in a social situation, and that the person I was speaking with did not believe that it was intended in a malicious way and that I apologised immediately afterwards,” he said.
“I have absolutely no recollection of any of this, and I do not believe that it happened. However, I want to be clear that I’ve always had the view that any racial language is wholly unacceptable in any environment,” he then wrote.
“I’m shocked and saddened by the allegation as I would never wish to cause anyone any offence.”
‘She wants to compete with the new wave of glamour girls’
Katie Price reportedly wants to give Bonnie Blue a run for her money, and not everyone is sold on the idea.
Katie is set to bring back her alter ego, Jordan, via the AI platform, OhChat. Fans of the former glamour model will get to interact with an AI version of Jordan from back in the day.
However, according to sources, those close to Katie Price are concerned she will be returning to her raunchy image…
Katie wants to collab with Bonnie (Credit: Splashnews.com)
Katie Price to rival Bonnie Blue
An insider alleged to Closer: “Her friends worry that it could be very destructive for Katie to go down this path. She thinks Bonnie’s a clever girl, she might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but then neither is she – you don’t get to be successful in this industry by being a wallflower. At the end of the day, Katie’s capitalised on the oldest game in the book, her body and looks.”
You don’t get to be successful in this industry by being a wallflower.
They continued: “While Katie won’t actually be taking part in orgies herself, she wants to compete with Bonnie and the new wave of glamour girls like her by using her new AI Jordan avatar.”
The source noted that Katie “still feels she’s the original and the best”. They also said that the 47-year-old mum-of-five “knows thousands of men still want sex with Jordan”. Therefore, she “hopes sexy livestreams of her AI version will earn her a fortune”.
While Bonnie has faced much backlash recently, Katie reportedly remains unbothered and would like to work with her.
Allegedly, Katie has “confided that she would love to team up with Bonnie Blue on a future collaboration”, insisting they could make millions together. It’s been said that Katie believes she would be a “great mentor for her”.
ED! has contacted Katie’s reps for comment.
Bonnie Blue wants to do reality TV (Credit: YouTube)
Bonnie Blue for reality TV?
While Katie might be eager to work with Bonnie, the 26-year-old adult content creator has admitted she would love to follow the reality TV route, just like Katie has.
In an interview with the Daily Star, Bonnie explained she is also eyeing up a couple of ITV reality shows.
“I would love to do Love Island and go in as a bombshell for 24 hours to see if I could split some of the couples up,” she said.
“I think that would be fun. I’d definitely cause a stir,” Bonnie added.
If the opportunity came her way, she’d also jump on a plane for I’m A Celeb. In the past, Katie has taken part in the show twice.
“Another one I’d love to do, and I’ve said it from a child, is I’m a Celebrity…,” Bonnie continued.
A “peace summit” between aides recently took place…
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle may use a “trump card” in helping to make a reconciliation with the royals happen, according to a royal commentator.
In May, the Duke of Sussex admitted he would love to reconcile with his family. He even reportedly plans to invite the royals to the 2027 Invictus Games in the UK.
Harry, 40, and Meghan, 43, have been estranged from the royal family for some years now. They stepped back from being working royals in 2020. In the years since, they’ve released a string of tell-all interviews and books, making damning claims about the monarchy.
Last week, reports claimed that aides for both the Sussexes and the king had a “peace summit” in London. It’s sparked speculation that a reconciliation could happen in the near future.
Now, royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams has shared his thoughts on the reports and whether he thinks a reconciliation could actually happen anytime soon.
Will Meghan and Harry reconcile with the royals in the near future? (Credit: Cover Images)
Could Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have a reconciliation with the royal family after ‘peace summit’?
Speaking to Royal Insider, Richard said of the recent meeting between aides: “What makes this matter so extraordinary is that we don’t actually know who initiated the meeting, though it was probably the Sussexes, who leaked details of it, and whether Prince William knew of it.
“King Charles is battling cancer, in his late seventies, and would like a relationship with his grandchildren. Prince Harry is an exile and undoubtedly feels it. Clearly, Meghan is the stronger of the couple, and they undoubtedly have an agenda which is linked, as are all their ventures, to the royal family, which they have trashed so mercilessly in the past when it suited them.”
However, Richard has warned that the king, 76, wouldn’t go ahead and reconcile with Harry without his eldest son, Prince William’s, agreement.
King Charles won’t act on a reconciliation with Harry without agreeing with William and Kate, a royal commentator suggests (Credit: Cover Images)
King Charles ‘won’t act’ on Harry reconciliation without William and Kate being in ‘agreement’
Richard told us: “The Prince and Princess of Wales and their children are the monarchy’s future.
“It is unthinkable that the king would act without ensuring they were in agreement.”
He also pondered over Harry’s alleged Invictus Games invitation to the royals. In June, a source claimed that Harry planned to send his family invites to the 2027 games in Birmingham.
There is a very long road to go before they and the royal family are reconciled.
Richard said: “However, the invitation to Invictus, an important military charity, is a trump card which the Sussexes will use, and they can, as is clear, be utterly ruthless. Leaking the details of the meeting might suit their agenda.
“They have declared they are ‘frustrated’ by this. But need attention with so much at stake with their Netflix contract soon due for renewal.”
Will William and Kate want to reconcile with Harry and Meghan? (Credit: Cover Images)
‘Long road ahead’ in royal ‘rift’
Despite the recent “peace summit” being seen as a positive sign by many, Richard has warned of a “very long road to go”.
He said: “There is a very long road to go before they and the royal family are reconciled, if, indeed, it ever happens.
“Every public bit of it will be followed by the world’s press. We are in for more turbulent times!”
Keeping Bernie Ecclestone away from Formula 1 is virtually impossible, despite the fact that he’s 94 years old.
Formula 1 wouldn’t be what it is today without Bernie Ecclestone, and his age isn’t stopping him from getting involved in discussions about the sport’s future.
He’s been spotted in the paddock several times this season, and Ecclestone even gave his verdict on Lewis Hamilton’s move to Ferrari, among other topics.
Ecclestone has always enjoyed a close relationship with Christian Horner ever since he led Red Bull onto the grid for the first time in 2005.
Horner included Ecclestone in a recent F1 commission meeting, as he gave his opinion on the upcoming regulations changes in 2026.
Dutch commentator and F1 expert Nelson Valkenburg has now shared the latest stories he’s heard coming from the paddock about the pair.
Unsurprisingly, it involves Alpine, valued at £1.2bn, and their future in the sport and the impending exit of Renault CEO Luca de Meo.
Photo by Mark Thompson/Getty Images
Christian Horner and Bernie Ecclestone rumoured to be making Alpine ownership move
Valkenburg was speaking on The Race F1 Podcast about Horner’s future and his potential next steps in the sport.
Ralf Schumacher believes Horner faces a problem returning to Formula 1, but the Dutch commentator explained: “When Ferrari was definitely interested, Horner was the right person to attract other big names.
‘And that situation changed, though, in the last year and a half. He’s not been able to keep or attract big names to the team, and that’s part of the team’s problems.
“I just have a feeling he’s going to end up at Alpine. I’ve seen him in talks with both De Meo, who’s out, I know and Briatore for hours and hours.
“What he wants most is to be a team owner. I feel he would love to own a team, and that team is partly up for sale.
“There have been rumours in this paddock that with some backing, maybe from Bernie Ecclestone himself, he could find himself at least a minority stake owner at Alpine.
“But that can only happen after January, because I think he’s under contract until then at Red Bull.
“But if I had to put money on it, he’s going to Alpine. But that’s still a long way away.”
Alpine remain firm on their stance that Formula 1 team is not for sale
There are currently 10 teams on the grid, with an 11th in the form of Cadillac preparing to enter the sport next season.
Formula 1 is becoming more and more lucrative, but it’s hard to imagine any team on the grid considering a sale when the valuation of their assets is constantly increasing.
Bids have reportedly been turned down for Racing Bulls in the past, and it’s hard to imagine Red Bull letting their second team go unless they’re forced to by the FIA for competitive reasons.
De Meo previously declared he has no interest in selling Alpine, while the team’s chief advisor, Flavio Briatore, previously assured Alpine staff the team wouldn’t be sold.
However, with De Meo about to move on, all eyes are on whether Renault change their mind about the team’s future.
Briatore has been linked with bringing Horner in, but after more than 20 years guiding Red Bull as team principal and CEO, it wouldn’t be a surprise if he wanted a more controlling stake elsewhere on the grid.
Alongside Ecclestone, he would be investing with one of the most influential voices in motorsport history.
Drive to Survive: The Drama Behind Formula 1’s Most Controversial Show
Since its debut in 2019, Netflix’s Drive to Survive has become a global sensation. It pulled Formula 1 out of its niche audience and placed it in front of millions of new eyes, particularly in the United States. With its behind-the-scenes access, emotional storytelling, and high-octane drama, the series revitalized the sport’s image, capturing the personal lives, rivalries, and high-stakes decisions of the paddock. But in 2024, the show faces its toughest opponent yet: the growing criticism that it has sacrificed truth for drama.
Max Verstappen Calls It Out
Among the most vocal critics is three-time world champion Max Verstappen. Never shy to speak his mind, Verstappen has long expressed frustration with how Drive to Survive misrepresents events and personalities for the sake of entertainment. After the 2024 Miami Grand Prix, Verstappen sarcastically remarked that he was “apparently very sad” about Lando Norris’s first-ever Formula 1 win—despite actual footage showing him warmly congratulating Norris. The show, however, used out-of-context clips from other events to paint a different picture: a bitter rival overshadowed by a rising star.
Verstappen’s comments aren’t isolated. He previously declined to participate in earlier seasons, citing the show’s tendency to “fake rivalries” and “manufacture drama.” Now, with more evidence backing his claims, his concerns have reignited a broader conversation about how far the series has drifted from the reality it claims to portray.
Fans See Through the Fiction
Longtime F1 fans have been equally vocal. While no one denies that Drive to Survive has been a marketing success—helping boost attendance, viewership, and even sponsorship deals—the storytelling strategy increasingly comes across as manipulative. The Miami incident was just one example. In another case, the series portrayed George Russell as the dominant force at Mercedes without mentioning his disqualification from a major race due to a technical infringement. This omission painted an incomplete and arguably misleading picture of the 2024 season.
Then there was the departure of Adrian Newey, one of the sport’s most influential engineers, from Red Bull—a major moment that barely got a mention. Instead, the show leaned into interpersonal drama within the team, brushing over one of the biggest technical shake-ups in recent memory. Similarly, Oliver Bearman’s incredible debut in Saudi Arabia and subsequent points-scoring performance with two different teams in a single season—a historic feat—was reduced to a footnote, if mentioned at all.
When Drama Replaces Documentation
These examples underscore a growing concern: Drive to Survive is no longer a documentary series but a dramatized reality show loosely based on real events. And that’s a problem, particularly in a sport as complex and driven as Formula 1. Fans don’t mind a bit of tension or theatrical editing—but when moments are deliberately recontextualized or ignored, it undermines the integrity of the sport and the trust of the audience.
This isn’t a new issue in entertainment. Other docuseries like The Last Dance or The Last Dance have faced similar criticisms. But in Formula 1, where every millisecond and team decision can make or break a season, factual accuracy matters more than most genres. By manipulating reality, the show not only misrepresents events but also reshapes how new fans perceive the drivers, teams, and the competition itself.
Misleading the Casual Audience
A casual viewer who watches Drive to Survive without following the actual races might walk away with a very different understanding of what truly happened. Imagine believing that Mercedes had a dominant showing at the Belgian Grand Prix—because the show didn’t mention George Russell’s disqualification. Or thinking that Max Verstappen and Lando Norris are fierce enemies, when in reality they celebrated together after Norris’s victory.
This warped perspective isn’t harmless. It creates confusion, spreads misinformation, and even fuels online toxicity between fanbases, based on fictionalized storylines rather than real sportsmanship or competition.
What’s the Line Between Entertainment and Misrepresentation?
Every show needs to keep its audience engaged, and editing for emotional impact isn’t inherently wrong. But Drive to Survive often crosses a line. Important race results, season-defining technical changes, and emotional victories—like Lewis Hamilton’s triumphant return to the top step of the podium at Silverstone in 2024—are sometimes skimmed over or reframed entirely.
There’s also a broader cultural implication here. As Formula 1 continues to grow globally, particularly in the U.S., Drive to Survive is often the first exposure many fans have to the sport. That first impression matters. If it’s based on misleading information, it damages the credibility not just of the show, but of Formula 1 as a whole.
Where Do We Go From Here?
The backlash now playing out across social media isn’t just a minor grumble. It’s a warning sign. F1 veterans, newer fans with deeper interest in the sport, and even the drivers themselves are calling for a course correction.
The solution isn’t to cancel Drive to Survive. Far from it—the show has done too much good for the sport to be abandoned. Instead, it needs to return to its roots as a documentary with drama, not drama disguised as a documentary. Key race moments should be presented with accuracy. Driver personalities should be respected, not repurposed for clicks. And editorial decisions should enhance, not distort, the emotional resonance of the season.
A Fork in the Road
As it stands, Drive to Survive is at a crossroads. It can double down on manufactured storylines and risk alienating the passionate base that fueled its rise—or it can evolve into a more honest portrayal of the sport. A show that balances authenticity with storytelling would not only keep current fans but also educate and inspire the next generation of F1 enthusiasts.
Formula 1 is dramatic by nature. With fierce rivalries, shocking crashes, weather unpredictability, and strategic gambles that can flip the outcome of a race, the sport doesn’t need fabricated tension to be compelling. The truth is dramatic enough.
If Netflix and the show’s producers take the feedback to heart, they have the opportunity to refine Drive to Survive into something even more powerful: a show that informs, excites, and earns the trust of both new fans and longtime followers alike.
Until then, fans will keep asking the same question: Is Drive to Survive telling the story of Formula 1—or rewriting it?
Liam Lawson’s future at Red Bull, and Formula 1 in general, is hanging in the balance for 2026 after a turbulent start to this season.
Red Bull chose the Kiwi driver to replace Sergio Perez for the 2025 campaign, despite having less experience than his Racing Bulls teammate Yuki Tsunoda. He had been beaten by the Japanese driver in his six-race stint in 2024, but Christian Horner believed Lawson had the higher ceiling.
The 23-year-old faced the daunting prospect of being in the second Red Bull seat next to Max Verstappen, with his predecessors all struggling massively. Unfortunately, Lawson became the next to suffer the same fate.
He was eliminated in Q1 in the opening two races, qualifying last twice in Shanghai. Subsequently, Red Bull dropped Lawson back down to Racing Bulls, with Tsunoda taking his place for the remainder of the season.
Lawson lost total confidence at Red Bull as he could not find any performance from the RB21. Racing Bulls give him the chance to lift his morale in a familiar environment and an easier car to drive.
But the New Zealander has to perform. Lawson is out of contract in 2025, and Red Bull may have already made their decision on his future for 2026.
Photo by Mark Thompson/Getty Images
Liam Lawson set to stay at Racing Bulls for 2026
Since returning to Racing Bulls, Lawson has been outperformed by rookie teammate Isack Hadjar. The Frenchman has been hugely impressive in 2025, making regular Q3 appearances and points finishes.
But Racing Bulls team principal, now Red Bull CEO, Laurent Mekies says Lawson’s work is going unnoticed behind the scenes. The Kiwi driver is putting in the effort to improve his form, which has been rewarded with points finishes in Monaco and Silverstone, the latter being his best F1 result with P6.
He has been getting closer to Hadjar in recent races, and might have done enough to see him stay on the grid. According to a report from The New Zealand Herald, it is ‘increasingly likely’ that Lawson will be retained for the 2026 season.
‘Sources’ are suggesting that the 23-year-old will stay with Racing Bulls ‘as the team’s senior driver’. He technically already holds that role alongside Hadjar in 2025, but Red Bull are understood to ‘want at least one experienced driver’ at the Faenza outfit.
The 2026 F1 regulations are set to shake up the pecking order with new engine and chassis rulesets. Lawson knows Racing Bulls well, having now had three separate stints with the team, and will be a familiar face to rely on in the new era.
Photo by Rudy Carezzevoli/Getty Images
Who will be Liam Lawson’s teammate at Racing Bulls next season?
With Lawson’s future allegedly decided, Red Bull are still left with a headache over their driver line-up. Tsunoda and Hadjar are also out of contract in 2025, while the team desperately try to hold on to their star driver as Verstappen engages in talks with Mercedes.
Tsunoda has an ‘almost 0%’ chance of staying in F1 in 2026, leaving a vacancy at Red Bull. Hadjar is being favoured for the seat for next season, having impressed Helmut Marko.
A promotion back to Red Bull may be possible for Lawson in the future, but he will want to take advantage of his opportunity at Racing Bulls in 2026, especially with the new regulations.
The New Zealander will be key for the Faenza outfit in technical feedback, development, and also helping his teammate, who is almost certain to be a rookie. Arvid Lindblad is eyeing a seat at Racing Bulls as Red Bull prepare him for F1 after his debut F2 campaign.
George Russell’s Future in F1: Mercedes, Max Verstappen, and the Road Ahead
Welcome to another edition of F1 News Inside the Paddock, where we bring you the most pressing, controversial, and influential stories shaping the Formula 1 grid. Today, we’re diving into one of the biggest headlines dominating the sport—George Russell’s uncertain future at Mercedes—a saga that encapsulates the raw tension, political intrigue, and ruthless business calculus that defines Formula 1.
The George Russell Paradox
On paper, George Russell is everything a top team would want in a driver: young, intelligent, media-savvy, and above all, blisteringly fast. Since joining Mercedes, Russell has proven his mettle—not only going toe-to-toe with the legendary Lewis Hamilton but also bringing in significant results. In the current ground effect era, he accounts for four of Mercedes’ six wins and six of their seven pole positions.
And yet, Russell finds himself in one of the most precarious positions on the grid—not because of a lack of talent or results, but because of one name: Max Verstappen.
The Verstappen Factor
Max Verstappen’s potential availability has sent shockwaves through the paddock. A four-time world champion with Red Bull, Verstappen’s dominance has redefined this era of Formula 1. So when reports of Toto Wolff meeting with Verstappen in Sardinia surfaced, it wasn’t just idle chatter—it was a seismic shift in Mercedes’ driver strategy.
And this is the painful paradox: Russell, while performing brilliantly, could find himself displaced by the very success he has helped sustain. If his form improves and he climbs above Verstappen in the standings, it could trigger Max’s Red Bull exit clause—paving the way for Mercedes to sign the Dutchman and potentially leaving Russell without a seat.
It’s a vicious irony: the better he performs, the more he risks making himself redundant.
Behind the Scenes at Mercedes
Adding complexity to this already tense scenario is Mercedes’ dual role—not just as Russell’s current team but also as his management body. They are essentially playing both agent and employer, which begs the question: can they truly prioritize his interests when another superstar driver might be on the market?
This contradiction becomes more glaring when you consider that 17-year-old Italian prodigy Andrea Kimi Antonelli—currently touted as the “next Verstappen”—allegedly has a contract lined up for 2026. Meanwhile, Russell does not.
It’s clear that Mercedes are future-gazing, and while they’re making public declarations of satisfaction with their current lineup, their actions speak louder.
Could Red Bull Be an Option?
If Russell were to be ousted from Mercedes, where would he go?
On the surface, Red Bull might appear the obvious destination. If Verstappen leaves, they’ll need a top-tier replacement. But Red Bull isn’t the team it once was. Internal turmoil—starting with the fallout at the Miami GP, Adrian Newey’s departure, the exit of key figures like Jonathan Wheatley, and Christian Horner losing his power base—has left the Milton Keynes outfit in disarray.
Laurent Mekies and the Racing Bulls setup may signal a new direction toward younger, in-house talent like Arvid Lindblad and Isack Hadjar. Even if Russell were to join, he’d be stepping into a chaotic, rebuilding operation without a clear technical leader or team stability.
Would Russell gamble his career on such a move? The risks are enormous.
The Aston Martin Opportunity
Then there’s Aston Martin—a team quietly assembling a powerhouse for 2026 and beyond. With the acquisition of Adrian Newey, former Mercedes engine boss Andy Cowell, and strong Honda support for the upcoming power unit regulations, Aston is positioning itself as a future title contender.
Russell has existing relationships at Aston Martin. He worked briefly with Cowell at Mercedes, and reports suggest that team owner Lawrence Stroll sees him as the potential cornerstone for their next chapter.
The hurdle? Fernando Alonso and Lance Stroll. Alonso is under contract for 2026, and Lance—well, he’s the owner’s son. While it’s nearly impossible Russell replaces Lance, Alonso might be persuaded to step aside, especially since he has an ambassadorial role locked in for the post-driving phase of his career.
If Aston Martin can convince Alonso to take that graceful exit, a Russell–Stroll partnership could anchor the team’s 2026 efforts with a blend of youth, experience, and long-term vision.
The Psychological Toll
Amid all this speculation, let’s not forget the human element. Russell is still very much in the championship fight. Yet, behind the scenes, he’s walking a psychological tightrope. Every comment from Toto Wolff, every media rumor, and every missed podium contributes to a growing sense of uncertainty.
Yes, there are reports that Mercedes is looking to extend Russell’s contract by three more years. But that hasn’t been confirmed, and in Formula 1, the lack of clarity often speaks volumes.
This kind of background noise, while seemingly trivial to outsiders, can take a massive toll on a driver’s performance. F1 isn’t just about raw speed—it’s about focus, clarity, and confidence. The mental strain of not knowing your future, even when performing at your peak, is immense.
What’s Next?
If you were George Russell, what would you do?
Do you wait and hope Mercedes recommits?
Do you entertain Aston Martin and its promising long-term project?
Do you take the risk and leap into the firestorm that is Red Bull?
Each choice comes with its own rewards and pitfalls. But perhaps the real question is: does Russell even have a choice?
Because this is F1. Loyalty is fleeting, success is everything, and timing is brutal. One year you’re the future of a top team, the next you’re a casualty of their next big gamble.
Final Thoughts
In the end, George Russell’s situation serves as a stark reminder that Formula 1 is as much about politics and perception as it is about lap times and talent. Whether Mercedes retains him or not, whether Red Bull or Aston Martin make a move, one thing is certain: Russell deserves clarity, and F1 fans deserve transparency.
As the 2025 driver market begins to solidify and 2026’s rule changes loom, the next few months will be critical—not just for George Russell, but for the entire competitive landscape of Formula 1.
Let us know: If you were in Russell’s racing boots, what would you do? Take the safe bet, the bold leap, or wait it out?
Because in F1, the biggest moves don’t always happen on track.
Max Verstappen at the Center of Red Bull’s Turmoil: Mercedes, Team Exits, and a Future in Flux
The Formula 1 paddock is abuzz with drama, speculation, and power plays — and at the eye of the storm is none other than reigning world champion Max Verstappen. With Red Bull Racing facing a wave of internal chaos, questions loom large about Verstappen’s future, Red Bull’s leadership, and whether Mercedes is ready to seize the moment.
Red Bull’s Leadership Crisis: The Departure Heard Round the Paddock
The tipping point in Red Bull’s current crisis came with the shocking departure of Christian Horner, the long-time team principal who helped build the team’s dominance over two decades. Though the exact reasons remain under wraps, the timing of the split has prompted intense scrutiny, especially from F1 insiders like Martin Brundle.
Speaking on the Sky F1 podcast, Brundle didn’t hold back. He accused Verstappen’s inner circle — specifically his father Jos Verstappen — of “lobbing hand grenades” at Red Bull for months. Jos has openly criticized Horner’s leadership in the press, fueling rumors that Max’s camp played a pivotal role in Horner’s ousting.
“I think at times Max’s dad Jos has made it absolutely clear that he thinks Christian shouldn’t be leading the company and the team,” Brundle said. “They’ve played a key role in Christian’s exit.”
Mercedes Waiting in the Wings?
As Red Bull tries to stabilize, Mercedes appears to be waiting for the right moment to pounce. The Brackley-based team has struggled since the hybrid era dominance faded, and snatching Verstappen could be the blockbuster move they need to reclaim the front of the grid.
Adding fuel to the fire, Nelson Piquet Jr. — brother of Max’s partner Kelly — hinted on a podcast that a deal with Mercedes is all but done.
“Who knows? Next year with Max there… just missing final contract details, but everyone knows it’s an option,” Piquet Jr. casually said, raising eyebrows across the sport.
Is it a slip of the tongue or a deliberate leak? Either way, it aligns with growing reports that Verstappen is seriously considering a 2026 switch, as the sport ushers in new engine regulations and team dynamics shift.
Antonelli’s Readiness — and the Risk for Mercedes
Should Verstappen join Mercedes, one immediate question is: who makes way? The team’s current drivers, George Russell and Andrea Kimi Antonelli, have both staked claims on long-term seats. Antonelli, a rising star who earned his first F1 podium in Canada, has said he’s open to partnering with Max.
“I don’t mind, to be honest,” Antonelli said about potentially teaming up with Verstappen. “They are two very good drivers. I’m very happy with George. There’s a really good dynamic in the team.”
But Brundle warns that putting a rookie like Antonelli alongside Verstappen could be career-ending. Since Daniel Ricciardo’s exit in 2018, Verstappen has famously outshone every teammate, turning Red Bull’s second seat into what some call a “graveyard.”
“Would they want to risk putting Antonelli, their future star, up against Max?” Brundle asked. “Max has broken a lot of teammates because of his speed… and he comes with a bit of baggage. He’s not the easiest group to handle.”
The $59 Million Dilemma
Max Verstappen is undoubtedly Red Bull’s greatest weapon — but also its most expensive one. His contract, rumored to cost the team up to £59 million a year, runs through 2028. That’s a massive financial commitment for a team already rocked by high-profile departures including Adrian Newey, Jonathan Wheatley, and Rob Marshall.
Horner’s exit only intensifies the instability. Red Bull’s second car has managed a paltry seven points all season, and without Verstappen’s heroics, the team would be far lower in the Constructors’ standings.
The situation is so critical that Red Bull may be willing to consider unprecedented moves to retain him — including, according to one report, letting Verstappen rename the team.
Yes, you read that right. Red Bull may hand over naming rights to their star driver if that’s what it takes to keep him in place through the regulatory shakeup in 2026.
Mercedes’s 2026 Advantage?
Much of Verstappen’s decision hinges on the 2026 regulation changes, which will introduce new engine formats and chassis designs. Mercedes is tipped to produce the most competitive power unit under these rules — a key factor that could lure Max to Brackley.
Red Bull, meanwhile, is placing its hopes in a new works partnership with Ford, aiming to build an engine strong enough to convince Verstappen to stay. But this is uncharted territory. Unlike Mercedes or Ferrari, Red Bull has no legacy as an engine manufacturer — and that’s a risk Max will be weighing carefully.
The Legacy Question
For Max Verstappen, the decision isn’t just about money or performance — it’s about legacy. At 27, he already has three world championships under his belt and is considered one of the greatest talents of his generation. But where he spends the next phase of his career will define his place in history.
Does he stay with Red Bull and become synonymous with the brand — like Schumacher with Ferrari or Senna with McLaren? Or does he chase new glories with Mercedes and attempt to replicate what Lewis Hamilton did in his dominant run?
If the team truly offers him naming rights, Verstappen could literally write his name into Formula 1 lore. But would that be enough to offset the uncertainty around Red Bull’s technical direction, or tempt him to walk away from a potential dynasty?
Final Thoughts: A Storm Still Brewing
Whatever Max Verstappen decides, the ripple effects will be massive. His presence — or absence — could reshape the entire F1 grid for years. Red Bull is clinging tightly, throwing financial muscle and creative offers at the problem. Mercedes, meanwhile, is circling, quietly building the case that their garage is the best home for a future legend.
As 2026 inches closer and the stakes skyrocket, one thing is certain: this saga is far from over. Whether he stays, switches, or rewrites the team’s identity entirely, Max Verstappen holds the keys to the sport’s next chapter.
Cadillac’s Big Bet: Why Valtteri Bottas and Sergio Perez Make Sense for F1’s Newest Team
As the 2025 Formula 1 season accelerates into its final third, the motorsport world is already looking ahead to 2026 — and not just because of the sweeping regulatory changes on the horizon. A new team is preparing to make its long-awaited debut: Cadillac F1. Backed by American auto giant General Motors, Cadillac’s entry is the biggest addition to the sport in years. But as their infrastructure solidifies and their engineers work tirelessly on next year’s car, one crucial piece of the puzzle was still missing — the driver lineup. That wait is nearly over.
After months of speculation and behind-the-scenes negotiation, it appears Valtteri Bottas and Sergio Perez are poised to be the duo that leads Cadillac into its debut Formula 1 campaign. This pairing might not scream “future world champions” — but for a team not yet aiming for wins, that’s not the point.
Cadillac’s Core Philosophy: Stability Over Spectacle
For a brand-new F1 team, the priorities are different from those of an established competitor. Cadillac isn’t here to take pole positions from Red Bull or beat Ferrari on strategy — not yet. Their short-term success depends on building a strong foundation, not headline-grabbing results. That means they need drivers who can consistently finish races, deliver detailed technical feedback, and help develop a car from the ground up.
That immediately rules out untested rookies. While an American driver like Colton Herta or Logan Sargeant might offer valuable marketing opportunities, the team has made it clear: they’re not signing drivers for “vanity reasons.” Competence and clarity trump national ties.
Why Valtteri Bottas?
Bottas is the ideal candidate for a new team. The 10-time race winner brings a wealth of experience, including five seasons alongside Lewis Hamilton at Mercedes during their championship-winning era. He’s a known quantity — fast, consistent, and excellent at giving feedback. Crucially, he understands how to work within a complex, competitive organization.
Moreover, Bottas isn’t just any ex-champion’s wingman. During his time at Mercedes, he played a central role in one of the most dominant dynasties in F1 history. Since then, his tenure at Alfa Romeo (now Stake F1) has shown his maturity and willingness to help shape a smaller team.
Rumors of his Cadillac deal began swirling after his social media teaser — a clip where he walks past a Cadillac SUV and notes that “both seats are free.” Reports from Japanese outlet Autoport Web claim that contract terms are agreed, with only legal and promotional steps left before the announcement. Bottas is also said to be eager to begin simulator work as soon as possible — a major plus for the development-focused phase Cadillac is entering.
Why Sergio Perez?
Perez’s F1 journey has been turbulent, particularly in recent years with Red Bull Racing. While his time alongside Max Verstappen exposed some weaknesses, it also highlighted a key truth: Perez isn’t the problem — Red Bull’s one-size-fits-one approach to car development was. The 2025 season has confirmed what many suspected — Red Bull’s car is tailored almost entirely to Verstappen, leaving others struggling to extract performance.
Enter Cadillac, where Perez can serve as a team leader, not a support act. With his wealth of midfield experience — including standout years at Force India and Racing Point — he knows how to extract results from limited machinery.
Additionally, from a commercial and strategic standpoint, Perez brings immense value. Though he’s not American, he’s massively popular across North America, particularly among Mexican and Latino fans. Miami, Austin, and Mexico City races all see a sea of “Checo” supporters — a dream for any sponsor-focused team.
And speaking of sponsors, Carlos Slim’s backing is no small matter. Perez’s longtime benefactor could bring tens of millions in funding through sponsorship deals, giving Cadillac financial flexibility in its development and operations.
Former Red Bull sporting director Jonathan Wheatley has publicly praised Perez’s professionalism and pace, stating he has “no doubt” that Checo still has the skills to thrive. Even Verstappen has lent his support, describing Perez as a great choice for a new team thanks to his proven point-scoring abilities in less competitive cars.
A Smart, Balanced Duo
The potential pairing of Bottas and Perez makes sense from every angle — performance, experience, commercial value, and team-building. Neither driver is in their peak years, but both are proven quantities who can keep the team grounded while helping them grow.
They also bring complementary strengths. Bottas is calm, technically minded, and exceptionally diligent in setup work. Perez is a race-day opportunist, capable of bold tire strategies and late-race heroics. Between the two, Cadillac gets a team that can maximize results on Sunday while shaping the car from Monday to Friday.
Why Not a Rookie?
The temptation to put an American rookie in one of the seats must have been strong. F1 has seen a surge in U.S. interest in recent years, and an American driver would be a logical extension of Cadillac’s branding ambitions.
But rookies are a gamble — especially in a development-heavy phase. They don’t yet know how to give precise technical feedback. They lack references to judge a car’s behavior. And if performance dips, it becomes unclear whether the problem is the driver or the machine.
That’s not a risk Cadillac can afford to take — not yet. They need to build credibility first, and Bottas and Perez offer that in spades.
Looking Ahead to 2026
With Cadillac joining at the same time as the new 2026 engine and aero regulations, there’s an opportunity to shake up the pecking order. Remember Brawn GP’s miracle run in 2009? Or Mercedes’ era of domination beginning in 2014? Regulatory resets can be game-changers.
If Cadillac nails their interpretation of the new rules — especially as a works team building their own power unit with GM — they could punch above their weight. Having drivers like Bottas and Perez, who can both exploit performance and guide the technical team, could turn that possibility into reality.
Final Thoughts
Cadillac’s first season in Formula 1 isn’t about winning — it’s about learning. And learning is best done with teachers, not students. In Valtteri Bottas and Sergio Perez, Cadillac appears to have found the ideal mentors for their ambitious project.
They may not challenge Red Bull, Mercedes, or Ferrari right away. But don’t be surprised if this pragmatic, experienced pairing helps Cadillac evolve into a serious contender — not just a marketing story.
So, what do you think? Are Bottas and Perez the right choices for Cadillac’s debut? Or would you have preferred a bold rookie gamble?
Will Meghan and Harry reconcile with the royals in the near future? (Credit: Cover Images)
King Charles won’t act on a reconciliation with Harry without agreeing with William and Kate, a royal commentator suggests (Credit: Cover Images)
Liam Lawson’s future at Red Bull, and Formula 1 in general, is hanging in the balance for 2026 after a turbulent start to this season.
