Lewis Hamilton, Charles Leclerc, and the Cultural Crossroads at Ferrari

In the ever-evolving world of Formula 1, performance is judged not only by lap times and championship points but also by something less visible—organizational culture. And few teams have a culture as storied, complex, and often resistant to change as Scuderia Ferrari.

So when Lewis Hamilton—a seven-time world champion and one of the sport’s most adaptive, intelligent racers—quietly confirmed that he is now running Charles Leclerc’s setup philosophy on the SF-25, it may have seemed like a minor technical footnote. In reality, it signals a shift with deep and potentially troubling implications for Ferrari’s future.

A Subtle Confirmation with Massive Implications

On the surface, setup alignment seems logical. Charles Leclerc, Ferrari’s golden child and a driver molded entirely within its system, has found relative stability in 2025 through a specific car configuration. His current setup favors a more aggressive, oversteer-prone balance that rotates quickly on corner entry—a package that suits his reflexive driving style and has yielded consistency, particularly in the slower sectors where Ferrari has historically struggled.

For Ferrari’s engineers, this success presented a tempting shortcut. If Hamilton was underperforming relative to expectations, why not bring him closer to the setup that seems to be working? From a pure driven perspective, it made sense.

But Formula 1 is not just a technical sport—it’s a human one. And this decision, while seemingly benign, threatens to marginalize Hamilton not just as a driver, but as a transformational figure.

Style Clash: Why Setup Isn’t Just a Preference

Hamilton’s brilliance lies not in pure aggression but in balance, tire preservation, and long-run consistency. He prefers a stable front end, progressive rear grip, and a predictable feedback loop. Asking him to conform to Leclerc’s twitchier, more reactive style is like asking a concert pianist to play jazz with someone else’s sheet music. He can do it—but it’s not how he’s made his legend.

This is not a small compromise. Forcing both drivers into a singular setup philosophy narrows the team’s developmental perspective. Instead of gathering two unique data streams from two of the most talented drivers on the grid, Ferrari is now filtering progress through one driver’s comfort zone. And that, inevitably, raises a thorny question: who sets the agenda at Ferrari?

The Psychological Cost

At its core, this is about more than camber angles and differential maps. It’s about hierarchy and identity.

Hamilton didn’t sign with Ferrari just to drive; he came to lead. His years at Mercedes were marked not just by dominance, but by deep collaboration. His feedback wasn’t merely acknowledged—it became central to car development. He helped shape the team from within.

By contrast, Ferrari seems unwilling—at least for now—to let go of its old structure. Leclerc, after all, is homegrown. His communication style, even his perceived silence on team radio, is seen internally as composure. His inconsistencies are reframed as growth. In other words, Ferrari is treating his approach not merely as one way, but as the way.

That’s not inherently wrong—unless it prevents the team from evolving. And when that rigidity begins to alienate one of the sport’s greatest minds, the cost isn’t just in performance. It’s in potential.

History Repeats Itself

Ferrari has seen this movie before. Alain Prost, in the early 1990s, voiced frustration at Ferrari’s refusal to fully integrate his feedback. Fernando Alonso, too, was drawn into organizational quicksand at McLaren and later saw his ambitions stifled by political inertia at Ferrari.

Hamilton’s current trajectory echoes these patterns—only now the stakes are even higher. This was supposed to be a partnership that redefined Ferrari. Not a rehash of past mistakes.

The Cost of Comfort

Right now, Ferrari is trailing Red Bull’s juggernaut and facing increasing pressure from a resurgent McLaren. Its Constructors’ Championship hopes are still mathematically alive, but the internal dynamics—particularly this setup convergence—may soon weigh more heavily than outright pace.

If Ferrari continues to prioritize short-term alignment over long-term evolution, it risks more than technical inefficiency. It risks losing Hamilton’s trust. And once a driver of his caliber feels sidelined—not just in race strategy but in car philosophy—the relationship becomes transactional. Ferrari, instead of being reshaped by Hamilton’s experience, may merely absorb him into its status quo.

A Narrowing Path

From here, the danger is a feedback loop. If Leclerc continues to thrive under the current setup and Hamilton doesn’t, Ferrari will see that as validation. Points will justify prioritization. Hamilton’s influence will shrink, not through malice, but through a slow drift of relevance.

And in doing so, Ferrari will have turned one of the greatest drivers of all time into a supporting character in someone else’s story.

Looking Ahead: The Tipping Point Circuits

The next few races—at tracks like Budapest and Zandvoort—will stress setup philosophies even more. These circuits demand surgical tire management and absolute confidence in car balance through variable-speed corners. If Hamilton’s adapted setup begins to falter here, Ferrari’s decision will come under intense scrutiny.

The real question: will Ferrari be willing to recalibrate around Hamilton’s instincts if the data supports it? Or will they continue down this singular path, convinced that their comfort zone holds the only viable answers?

Legacy at Stake

Hamilton’s move to Ferrari was supposed to be the beginning of a new era—a marriage of elite driving and elite resources. But that vision is contingent on mutual trust. If Ferrari doesn’t meet him halfway, this era risks becoming a footnote—a cautionary tale of what happens when potential is smothered by tradition.

This isn’t just about setup sheets anymore. It’s about culture. It’s about whether Ferrari has the courage to evolve into a 21st-century team—one that listens, adapts, and empowers its champions to lead.

Because in modern F1, the teams that win aren’t necessarily the ones with the fastest cars. They’re the ones willing to be reshaped by the people most capable of winning.

Ferrari’s choice is clear: Let Lewis Hamilton lead, or continue proving that even signing a legend isn’t enough—if the team itself refuses to change.

Full Video:

Lotus and China: The Unlikely Gateway to One of Formula 1’s Most Iconic Comebacks

Formula 1, the pinnacle of motorsport, has always thrived on heritage, innovation, and bold disruption. Yet, few would have predicted that the iconic return of one of its most legendary teams would come through a gateway as surprising as China — the world’s largest automotive market. As discussions intensify behind the scenes, J, the powerful Chinese automotive conglomerate known for Volvo, Polestar, and Lotus, is making a serious push to join Formula 1 as the sport’s long-awaited 12th team. But this is no ordinary new entrant. This is the resurrection of racing royalty: the legendary Lotus name.

Lotus: A Legacy of Innovation and Glory

Founded in 1952 by the visionary engineer Colin Chapman, Lotus was never just a racing team; it was a movement that revolutionized Formula 1 through relentless innovation. Chapman’s genius birthed groundbreaking technologies such as the monocoque chassis and the introduction of ground effect aerodynamics—concepts that still echo in the sport today. Lotus made its F1 debut in 1958 and quickly ascended to dominance, claiming seven constructors’ championships and six drivers’ championships over the decades.

The likes of Jim Clark, Graham Hill, Emerson Fittipaldi, and Mario Andretti etched their names into history racing under the Lotus banner. The team’s record of 79 Grand Prix victories cements its place among Formula 1’s elite.

However, the golden era ended abruptly with Colin Chapman’s sudden death in 1982. Financial struggles, management upheavals, and difficulty adapting to the turbocharged era saw Lotus fade from the grid by 1994. While the Lotus name sporadically returned in the 2000s and 2010s, legal battles and ownership confusion diluted its legacy. The 2010-2015 Lotus F1 team, though competitive, lacked the revolutionary spirit of Chapman’s original vision and eventually reverted to Renault ownership.

The Chinese Giant Behind the Resurrection

The dramatic revival of Lotus began in 2017 when the Chinese automotive holding company J acquired a majority stake in Lotus Cars, the road car division. J’s acquisition marked a new chapter, transforming Lotus from a boutique British sports car maker into a global luxury performance brand with serious financial backing and technological muscle.

J’s ambitious investment poured billions into R&D, expanded production facilities across the UK and China, and emphasized cutting-edge electric vehicle technology. Lotus, once niche and British-centric, was reborn as a global competitor poised to rival Porsche and Ferrari. A joint powertrain venture with Renault further enhanced their engineering prowess, providing a foundation to develop high-performance engines and electric powertrains suitable for modern motorsport demands.

With these resources and a clear global vision, Lotus has evolved from nostalgia into a force ready to reclaim its place on the Formula 1 grid.

Why China? Why Now?

China’s emergence as a central player in this story is no accident. Despite being the world’s largest car market—selling over 30 million vehicles annually—China has yet to firmly establish itself in Formula 1. While the North American and European markets dominate F1’s commercial landscape, China’s immense population and growing motorsport interest represent an untapped reservoir of viewership and commercial potential.

FIA President Muhammad Ben Sulayem has openly acknowledged the strategic importance of a Chinese team, stating that discussions with Lotus are well underway and that Formula 1 management is likely to back the entry. This represents a major shift from the political gridlock that derailed previous bids like those from Andretti and Cadillac. Now, the approach is more unified, with the FIA and Formula 1 management aligned on welcoming a 12th team that offers substantial long-term value rather than simply adding more races.

The involvement of J and Lotus brings a compelling combination of heritage, innovation, and a gateway to the vast Chinese market—a trifecta that makes perfect business sense for Formula 1’s growth ambitions.

The Challenges and Opportunities Ahead

Reviving Lotus and establishing a new Formula 1 team is no small feat. The Andrétti Cadillac effort, despite massive resources and support, illustrates how challenging it is to break into this elite sport. The process involves navigating complex regulatory, technical, and commercial landscapes, with optimistic estimates placing Lotus’s debut towards the end of this decade.

Nevertheless, several promising developments could ease this transition. One is the proposed return to V8 engines, which could reduce costs by nearly half compared to the expensive current hybrid power units. This would make Formula 1 more accessible to new entrants like Lotus while helping control spiraling budgets.

Moreover, J’s strategic investments in automotive brands like Renault, Volvo, and Polestar complement their racing ambitions, providing a robust industrial and technical ecosystem for success.

What Could Lotus’s Return Mean for Formula 1?

The resurrection of Lotus is more than a sentimental nod to the past; it signals a broader transformation within Formula 1. It reflects the sport’s increasing globalization, especially its focus on Asia and electrification.

With J’s deep pockets, technological know-how, and a brand synonymous with innovation, Lotus could set new standards for performance and sustainability on the grid. This comeback also injects drama and narrative into a sport hungry for fresh stories that respect its rich heritage while embracing the future.

The potential addition of a Chinese-backed Lotus team could catalyze a broader expansion in Formula 1’s fanbase and commercial appeal, particularly in Asia. This could drive new TV deals, sponsorship opportunities, and technological partnerships, vital for the sport’s long-term vitality.

The Road Ahead: Legacy Meets Modernity

Lotus’s return raises a crucial question: Is reviving a historic name enough to reclaim its former glory in a sport that has evolved immensely since the 1990s? The answer depends not just on the brand but on J’s ability to marry Lotus’s innovative spirit with cutting-edge technology and a global vision.

Unlike the fragmented Lotus efforts of the past, this revival is a cohesive, well-funded campaign supported by one of the world’s largest automotive powers. It blends respect for history with the demands of modern motorsport—particularly the shift toward electrification and sustainability.

If successful, Lotus’s comeback will rewrite what a modern F1 team can be. Not merely participants, they could become pioneers once again, shaping the sport’s next era while honoring a legendary past.

Conclusion

The unexpected gateway for one of Formula 1’s most iconic comebacks lies in China, powered by J’s bold ambition to revive the Lotus name. More than nostalgia, this effort represents a powerful fusion of heritage, innovation, and global business strategy. With the backing of the FIA, shifting commercial dynamics, and a renewed technological focus, Lotus is poised not only to return but potentially to reshape the sport.

Formula 1 stands on the brink of another transformation. The question is no longer if Lotus will return, but when—and how much disruption this revived racing titan will unleash upon the grid.

Full Video:

McLaren’s Unstoppable Rise in 2025: Why Their Rivals Struggle to Keep Up

The 2025 Formula 1 season has, so far, been nothing short of a spectacular display of dominance by McLaren. With nine wins from twelve Grands Prix and more than double the points tally of any other team, McLaren’s MCL39 has firmly established itself as the benchmark car on the grid. What’s more, the drivers’ championship battle appears set to be an all-McLaren affair, with Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris locked in a fierce intra-team rivalry for the crown.

But while McLaren’s success is undeniable, a crucial question remains: what has happened to the opposition? Early in the season, there was widespread belief that McLaren’s lead would diminish as rivals adapted and developed, but instead, the gap has widened, with McLaren looking almost unbeatable on race day—at least when their drivers deliver.

Ferrari’s Unfulfilled Potential

Ferrari, once seen as McLaren’s main challenger, has turned out to be the biggest disappointment of 2025. Last year, Ferrari pushed McLaren all the way in the constructors’ championship, and expectations were high that it would continue to challenge for the title. However, results have been sparse—outside of Lewis Hamilton’s sprint victory in China, Ferrari’s best finish has been second place, achieved just four times.

The Italian team’s struggles largely stem from technical issues. A significant floor upgrade introduced at the Austrian Grand Prix showed promise, improving overall pace. Yet a rear suspension modification, expected at the next race in Spa, hints at deeper problems with the damper’s power and responsiveness. Ferrari’s 2025 car features a shorter gearbox designed to allow the cockpit to be moved rearwards within the same wheelbase—an aerodynamic strategy aimed at opening up development potential. Unfortunately, this has led to a more compact damper that cannot keep the floor optimally positioned at high speed, forcing Ferrari to run a higher ride height and sacrificing valuable performance.

The instability at high-speed corners, particularly affecting Hamilton, has forced the team to adopt more extreme setup compromises. Despite this, Ferrari’s team principal Fred Vers remains hopeful that upcoming upgrades will restore competitiveness, allowing Ferrari to win races and hold onto second place in the constructors’ standings. With major rule changes looming in 2026, maintaining stability at the leadership level is crucial—especially as rumors swirl about Vers’ future.

Red Bull’s Turbulent Year

Red Bull’s 2025 campaign has been mired in difficulties, compounded by the mid-season removal of Christian Horner from operational duties. Lauren McKias, formerly of Racing Balls, has stepped in as CEO, tasked with reviving Max Verstappen’s title bid and preparing for the significant rule overhaul next year.

Although Red Bull sits fourth in the constructors’ championship, Verstappen has remained the closest on pace to McLaren among the drivers. Yet the team’s struggles stem from inherent car limitations. Despite floor modifications introduced for the Austrian and British Grands Prix, the RB21 still exhibits balance issues, particularly understeer in slower, longer corners.

Red Bull’s woes trace back to mid-2023, when the team dominated races but Verstappen already voiced concerns about front-to-rear balance disconnects. The team’s aging and temperature-sensitive wind tunnel has hindered development—a new state-of-the-art facility in Milton Keynes is scheduled for 2026, but until then, progress is limited.

Verstappen’s brilliant wins in Japan and other standout performances prove his skill, but with 69 points separating him from championship leader Piastri, and no major upgrades planned this season, a title challenge looks unlikely. The focus has shifted heavily toward 2026, leaving fans to wonder if Red Bull can mount a serious comeback next year.

Mercedes’ Temperature Troubles

Mercedes has delivered a mixed 2025 season, capable of wins—George Russell’s pole-to-win in Canada is a prime example—but often struggling to keep pace consistently. The W16 has shown responsiveness and potential, especially in cooler conditions on smooth tracks with shorter corners, but it falters when temperatures rise and tires degrade faster.

Technical director James Allison acknowledges that some problems might be “hardwired” into the car’s architecture, limiting mid-season fixes. The championship is increasingly a contest of tire temperature management, where Mercedes has fallen short in the warmer conditions typical at many races.

Still, Mercedes has introduced promising tweaks, such as modified rear suspension geometry to better control ride height under braking. Although some experiments, like the anti-lift geometry used at Imola, were temporarily shelved, further improvements are expected in upcoming races. However, while Mercedes remains a threat on cooler days, it appears unlikely to dethrone McLaren this season.

How McLaren Pulled Away

While rivals struggled, McLaren kept evolving. Aside from a small wobble in Canada, where Piastri finished fourth for only 12 points, the team bounced back with dominant one-two finishes in Austria and Britain. Their upgrade path has been steady and well-judged.

Canada saw a new front wing and suspension tweaks aimed at improving Lando Norris’s feedback and feel of the car—important since Piastri was already comfortable with the existing setup. While these changes didn’t directly boost performance, Norris feels they’ve helped his driving. Subsequent updates to suspension fairings, brake duct inlets, and wheel inner fairings have added incremental gains.

A modified floor was tested in practice at Silverstone but wasn’t immediately raced—however, it’s set to be introduced at Spa and beyond, signaling continued development focus. Although McLaren’s development for 2025 is winding down as they shift toward the 2026 regulations, the MCL39 remains outstanding at managing rear tire temperatures, a critical advantage that delivers strong race pace even if qualifying battles remain close.

The Road Ahead

With McLaren’s advantage seemingly unassailable, the remainder of the 2025 season looks like a coronation for the team and its drivers. However, the sport thrives on unpredictability, and there is still time for Ferrari to claw back performance through upgrades, for Red Bull to regain composure under new leadership, and for Mercedes to find solutions to their tire woes.

For now, though, McLaren has raised the bar to new heights, combining brilliant engineering, smart development, and talented drivers to seize control of the championship in dominant fashion. Whether they can maintain this momentum through the rest of 2025 and into the rule shakeup of 2026 will be one of Formula 1’s most compelling stories.

Full Video:

The FIA Presidential Elections 2025: Muhammad Ben Salem’s Controversial Reign and Toto Wolff’s Unexpected Backing

As the FIA presidential elections approach later this year, the spotlight is firmly on current FIA President Muhammad Ben Salem. His tenure, marked by fierce controversy and accusations of authoritarian management, has polarized the motorsport community. Despite campaign promises to maintain a hands-off approach to Formula 1, Ben Salem’s actions have frequently contradicted this stance, drawing criticism from drivers, officials, and fans alike. Yet, even with this turbulence, he remains a strong favorite for reelection—a fact underscored by a surprising endorsement from Mercedes F1 Team Principal Toto Wolff.

Ben Salem’s Iron Fist Over Formula 1 and Beyond

Muhammad Ben Salem has spent much of the past four years consolidating power within the FIA, reshaping the governing body’s internal structure to ensure loyalists fill key positions. His approach to leadership has been described by some insiders as a “reign of terror,” a term first coined by former FIA senior steward Tim Mayer. Ben Salem’s rule has involved silencing dissenting voices, including senior executives and officials who have dared to criticize his methods or raise concerns about transparency.

Among the many contentious decisions under Ben Salem’s presidency:

Restrictions on Drivers’ Freedom of Speech: Drivers have been banned from swearing on team radio, and teams are prohibited from criticizing steward decisions or the FIA publicly.

Massive Staff Turnover: Key figures who opposed Ben Salem have been removed, including former FIA CEO Natalie Robin, race director Neils Wittich, compliance officer Paulo Bazari, and audit committee head Bertrren Badray. Notably, Bazari and Badray were investigating allegations of misuse of FIA funds.

Opaque Governance: Ben Salem has pushed for stricter non-disclosure agreements within the FIA Senate, limiting transparency around internal discussions and decisions.

Financial Control: The creation of an unregulated discretionary fund under his control, financed by the FIA, has raised eyebrows regarding accountability and the potential for misappropriation.

These moves have given Ben Salem near-total control over the FIA Senate, the body responsible for financial oversight and governance, after changes to Senate rules granted him the unilateral power to appoint or dismiss independent members. Critics argue this is a blatant power grab designed to silence opposition and centralize decision-making.

The Backlash: Calls for Change and Tim Mayer’s Challenge

The backlash against Ben Salem’s style has been mounting. Robert Reed, the FIA vice president for sport, resigned earlier this year, citing a “standards breakdown” under the current regime. Former FIA steward Tim Mayer, ousted from his position last year, has now declared his candidacy for the presidency, positioning himself as the candidate of reform and transparency.

Mayer’s campaign emphasizes returning power to FIA member clubs and the wider motorsport community, promising to reverse the centralization of authority and reinstate a culture of openness. In his announcement, Mayer criticized Ben Salem for failing to deliver on his initial promises of a “non-executive” presidency and instead entrenching himself as a dominant figure who rules with an iron fist.

Despite Mayer’s strong motorsport credentials and experience, he faces a daunting challenge. Ben Salem has spent years building a solid base of support, both within the FIA and among some international motor clubs, and his grip on the organization appears firm.

Toto Wolff’s Support: A Surprising Development

One of the more unexpected developments in the run-up to the election has been Toto Wolff’s public support for Ben Salem’s management style. While Wolff, the Mercedes F1 Team Principal, has sometimes disagreed with FIA decisions during Ben Salem’s tenure, he recently praised the president’s firm leadership in interviews with Austrian media.

Wolff acknowledged that Ben Salem “rules with an iron fist” and “doesn’t let anyone tell him what to do,” suggesting that this approach has merits, particularly in dealing with complex and varied challenges in modern motorsport governance.

Wolff specifically supported Ben Salem’s controversial ban on swearing over team radio, noting that many drivers do not speak English as a first language and that expressions can be misunderstood or shock listeners when literally translated. This stance contrasts sharply with Mercedes driver George Russell, who has vocally opposed the swearing ban as head of the Grand Prix Drivers Association.

Wolff also reversed his opposition to adding an 11th team to the Formula 1 grid, now endorsing the introduction of Cadillac’s works team—a move championed by Ben Salem as part of his broader vision to grow the sport.

What Does This Mean for the Future of the FIA?

The upcoming presidential election is shaping up to be a referendum on governance style and transparency within one of motorsport’s most influential organizations. On one side is Muhammad Ben Salem, whose centralized and authoritative approach has earned him staunch supporters like Toto Wolff but also a growing number of detractors concerned about accountability and fairness.

On the other side is Tim Mayer, representing a pushback against the concentration of power and advocating for a return to FIA principles that prioritize member clubs and openness. Whether Mayer can galvanize enough support to overcome Ben Salem’s entrenched position remains uncertain.

The wider motorsport community is watching closely. The outcome will influence not only Formula 1 but the future of international motorsport governance, including rallying, endurance racing, and grassroots motorsport initiatives overseen by the FIA.

Conclusion

Muhammad Ben Salem’s controversial reign as FIA President has been marked by bold, often divisive decisions that have reshaped the organization and its approach to Formula 1 and beyond. While his leadership style is criticized by many for silencing dissent and consolidating power, it has also garnered unlikely allies like Toto Wolff, who see value in firm governance amid an increasingly complex sporting landscape.

As the December 2025 elections approach, the FIA faces a critical crossroads: maintain the current course under Ben Salem’s iron fist or embrace reform and transparency under challengers like Tim Mayer. Motorsport fans and insiders alike will be paying close attention as this pivotal contest unfolds, with the future direction of global motorsport governance hanging in the balance.

Full Video:

Ferrari’s Secret Test at Mugello: The Crucial Moment That Could Shape Their 2025 Season

Wednesday at Mugello. The sun shines over the Tuscan hills as Ferrari rolls their SF-25 out of the garage. Officially, it’s “just a filming day” — a chance to capture sleek marketing footage, showcasing their latest Formula 1 contender in all its red glory. But beneath the surface, behind closed doors and PR smiles, something far more significant is unfolding.

This day, this “filming session,” could very well be the most critical moment of Ferrari’s 2025 campaign.

The Problem Beneath the Surface

The SF-25 isn’t slow. In fact, it boasts raw pace that has seen Charles Leclerc and Carlos Sainz challenge for podiums and points all season. But the car remains incomplete — a puzzle missing a vital piece. The problem? The rear suspension and its impact on the car’s overall stability and aerodynamic performance.

Lewis Hamilton, never one to mince words, summed it up best recently: the Ferrari is “running higher than we’d like.” What does that mean in F1 terms? Simply put, after Ferrari was disqualified in China for excessive plank wear — essentially running their car too close to the ground — they were forced to lift the car’s ride height.

This wasn’t just a lost opportunity for points on the track. It was lost potential, an aerodynamics nightmare. Ground effect is king in today’s F1 cars. Running closer to the ground maximizes downforce and grip, but it also pushes engineering to the limit — and Ferrari’s SF-25 had shown signs of being too aggressive, too fragile.

The result? A car that hates being pushed under load. It struggles with stability when the downforce peaks, leading to excessive wear on the plank and underfloor components. Rather than “lift-and-coast” purely to save fuel, Ferrari has been forced to lift the car to prevent structural damage.

Let that sink in.

The Mugello Gambit

Enter Mugello, Ferrari’s private playground in the hills of Italy. They say it’s a filming day — a low-key, low-pressure opportunity. But any Formula 1 insider knows that “filming days” allow up to 200 km of running, which at Mugello means about 38 laps on a demanding, technical circuit. That’s far from a casual spin.

More importantly, this run is not just about capturing cinematic shots of a Ferrari blazing through the iconic curves. Bolted to the SF-25 is something new: a freshly developed rear suspension, reportedly the solution Ferrari has been chasing for months.

Behind the closed garage doors, engineers and drivers are putting this new hardware to the test. Reports suggest it’s been quietly trialed in private sessions, but Mugello is where it’s getting its true shakedown — data-rich, methodical, and scrutinized down to the last millisecond.

The goal is simple but high stakes: validate the new rear suspension’s ability to address the car’s long-standing instability issues and return the SF-25 to a competitive ride height — without risking disqualification or mechanical failure.

Stakes Beyond the Track

Why does this matter so much? Because Ferrari is at a crossroads in 2025. Their season has been a rollercoaster — moments of brilliance punctuated by frustrating setbacks. The Constructors’ Championship battle is tight, and holding onto that precious P2 spot behind Red Bull means everything for morale, sponsorship, and momentum heading into 2026.

If this new suspension works as the whispers suggest, it could deliver roughly a tenth of a second per lap. In Formula 1 terms, that’s massive — enough to fend off a charging Mercedes and stop the season from slipping into another “what if” scenario.

This isn’t about this weekend’s race. It’s about clawing back lost pride and rewriting the narrative of the season. It’s about turning frustration into forward motion.

The Drivers’ Role: Hamilton and Leclerc Take Turns

Interestingly, Ferrari has split the driving duties during this test, with Charles Leclerc sharing track time with Lewis Hamilton. Each driver runs limited laps, uses controlled tyre sets, and operates under strict conditions designed to maximize the quality of data collected.

This is no casual joyride. It’s a surgical search for stability and performance. Every lap is analyzed in real time, every feedback session a step toward refining what could be the defining upgrade of their season.

The fact that Lewis Hamilton — a seven-time World Champion and fierce Mercedes rival — is behind the wheel at Mugello adds an extra layer of intrigue. He knows exactly what a good car feels like and is well placed to provide brutally honest feedback on whether Ferrari’s new solution delivers.

What’s Next?

If the test is successful, Ferrari’s plan is clear: unleash the new rear suspension at Spa-Francorchamps, the next marquee race on the calendar. Spa is where the car’s true potential can be showcased under race conditions, on a track that rewards stability and aerodynamic efficiency.

Fail, and Ferrari may be forced to abandon their 2025 ambitions and turn their full attention to 2026 — the season of radical regulation changes and new opportunities.

The FIA’s Watchful Eye

Add to this the pressure from the FIA, the sport’s governing body, whose steely gaze follows every technical development closely. Ferrari knows that any perceived bending of the rules will be scrutinized. The balance between innovation and legality is razor-thin.

This “filming day” could attract further investigation, especially if Ferrari’s upgrade yields a sudden leap in performance. The sport’s regulatory watchdogs are always ready to step in if a new part crosses the invisible line.

The Bigger Picture

Ferrari’s story at Mugello is more than a technical test. It’s a microcosm of Formula 1’s relentless pursuit of perfection — the eternal struggle between pushing boundaries and playing by the rules.

It reminds us that every fraction of a second gained on track is the product of months of secret development, countless hours in the wind tunnel, and an unyielding desire to win.

For fans hungry for drama, innovation, and raw competition, this test is the kind of story that elevates F1 beyond just racing. It’s a glimpse into the heart of a team fighting to reclaim its legacy.

Final Thoughts

So, when Ferrari calls it “just a filming day,” don’t be fooled. Behind those closed garage doors at Mugello, the future of their 2025 season is being written — one lap, one data point, one suspension arm at a time.

If the whispers are right, Ferrari isn’t done yet. They’re one upgrade away from rewriting the second half of the season and keeping the dream alive.

For those tired of safe, predictable F1 content, keep your eyes on Ferrari. Because this story? It’s just getting traction.

Full Video:

The Latest Formula 1 Buzz: Max Verstappen, Mercedes, Ferrari, and the Shifting Driver Market

Formula 1’s 2025 season is heating up not just on the track but behind the scenes, with major rumors and strategic moves dominating the paddock chatter. The latest headlines revolve around Max Verstappen’s possible switch to Mercedes, the ripple effects on the driver market, and Ferrari’s crucial developments as they strive to end their winning drought. Let’s unpack the biggest stories shaking up the sport right now.

Max Verstappen to Mercedes? The Rumors and Reality

The buzz around Max Verstappen potentially moving from Red Bull to Mercedes has reached fever pitch. Recent reports suggest Red Bull’s drastic decision to part ways with team principal Christian Horner might have been partly aimed at convincing Verstappen to stay put. However, insiders warn that this doesn’t guarantee Verstappen’s loyalty.

Top-level executives at Red Bull remain genuinely concerned that Verstappen might sign a deal with Mercedes in the upcoming weeks. As the contract deadline looms, speculation is rife about the future of several drivers, with George Russell also reportedly confident about securing a contract extension at Mercedes.

This speculation intensified after Verstappen was spotted in Sardinia, where Mercedes boss Toto Wolff is also known to have been present. While some claim this meeting was mere coincidence, many suspect serious talks took place. Verstappen’s jet took off from Nice, landed in Sardinia midday, and left the same day—hardly a casual day at the beach for a Formula 1 superstar.

Although Verstappen has publicly reiterated his loyalty to Red Bull, some believe the recent leadership shake-up was at least partially designed to stabilize the team and retain their championship-winning driver amid concerns of internal friction and team decline.

At the heart of this story is Oliver Mintzlaff, who wields significant control over Red Bull’s business decisions and is believed to have played a key role in Horner’s dismissal. Meanwhile, Verstappen’s father, Jos Verstappen, who has been vocal in the past about Horner’s leadership, reportedly had influence on the decision but is not the ultimate decision-maker.

The Driver Market: Shifting Seats and New Opportunities

With Verstappen’s future uncertain, the entire driver market is in flux. Reports indicate Liam Lawson’s seat at Red Bull remains tentative, with internal conversations swirling around team lineup changes involving other young talents such as Yuki Tsunoda and Mick Schumacher.

Sergio Perez, who had to take a year off after Red Bull paid out his contract, received a strong endorsement from Verstappen for a possible return to the grid, particularly targeting the new Cadillac F1 team. Perez’s skill and team loyalty during his Red Bull tenure have earned him respect, and many believe he’s a strong candidate for a comeback.

Cadillac’s entry into Formula 1 has sparked rumors involving several drivers, including Perez, Valtteri Bottas, Zhao Guanyu, Tsunoda, and Schumacher. Bottas is also linked with a potential Alpine move, which would further shake up the driver lineups and create openings elsewhere.

Meanwhile, Esteban Ocon appears stable in his Alpine seat, but uncertainties remain about the broader Mercedes driver lineup. Schumacher, currently with Haas, is still under the influence of Toto Wolff’s management umbrella, adding layers to the driver market chessboard.

George Russell’s Yacht Purchase: A Contract Sign?

A lighter yet intriguing note has come from George Russell, who recently bought a luxury Pershing 6X yacht, a high-end vessel typically costing around three million pounds. In the world of Formula 1, big purchases like this often signal confidence in future earnings and stability—leading to speculation that Russell may have secured a new Mercedes contract or at least expects to do so soon.

While yacht ownership isn’t a definitive confirmation of a contract extension, it’s unusual to see such a purchase amid contract uncertainties. Fans and insiders alike are watching closely as this development may hint at Mercedes’ commitment to Russell for the upcoming seasons.

Ferrari’s Crucial Technical Development: The Rear Suspension Upgrade

Ferrari’s struggles have been well-documented this year, with the Scuderia still searching for the magic formula to break their title drought. Matia Binotto, Ferrari’s team principal, recently acknowledged the tough situation and emphasized the importance of meeting fan expectations.

A major moment for Ferrari comes with a planned filming day at the Mugello circuit, which will be a key test for their new rear suspension system. This upgrade aims to solve ongoing issues with the car’s rear ride height—a problem that’s affected performance and reliability throughout the season.

Ferrari’s current SF-25 car struggles to maintain optimal ride height due to the suspension design changes introduced this year, which impacts the aerodynamic platform and overall balance. The new rear suspension is expected to help lower the car, reduce lift, and improve stability—potentially saving crucial tenths of a second per lap.

During the filming day, both Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton will run the new parts over about 100 kilometers each, giving Ferrari valuable data without using a full race weekend. Mugello’s track characteristics make it an ideal place to evaluate the new setup before integrating it into race events.

While the filming day primarily serves media purposes, Ferrari will use the collected insights to refine their car and decide whether to focus fully on 2026’s car development after stabilizing the current season.

The Big Picture: Team Dynamics and Future Prospects

The Formula 1 ecosystem is in a delicate balance. Red Bull is working to rebuild after internal upheaval, Ferrari is pushing to regain competitiveness with technical upgrades, and Mercedes is managing driver contracts amid rising competition.

Max Verstappen’s potential move to Mercedes would be one of the most seismic driver transfers in recent memory, reshaping championship battles and team hierarchies. Meanwhile, the growing rumors around driver moves across teams underscore the sport’s ever-shifting nature.

From Toto Wolff’s careful driver management to the new opportunities presented by Cadillac’s F1 entry, every piece in this complex puzzle affects the championship’s future narrative.

Fans are eagerly awaiting official announcements as the transfer window approaches, knowing that behind every headline lies a strategy to build the fastest, most stable teams in Formula 1’s ultra-competitive world.

Final Thoughts

Formula 1’s 2025 season continues to captivate, both on and off the track. The drama surrounding Max Verstappen and Mercedes exemplifies the sport’s high-stakes nature, where team leadership decisions and driver loyalties can change everything.

As the season progresses, developments at Ferrari and the evolving driver market will be just as important in shaping the grid and title race. Whether it’s a yacht purchase signaling a contract or a technical upgrade promising better performance, the intricate details paint a fascinating picture of the relentless pursuit of speed and success in the pinnacle of motorsport.

Stay tuned as this story unfolds—Formula 1 never fails to deliver surprises.

Full Video:

The Silent Storm: Lewis Hamilton’s Struggle Amid Ferrari’s Political Intrigue

Formula 1’s fast-paced action is well known — but the high-speed drama isn’t limited to the racetrack. Behind the scenes, power plays, secret alliances, and subtle betrayals shape the future of teams and drivers alike. The latest storm brewing in the paddock centers on none other than Lewis Hamilton, the seven-time world champion, now at the heart of a quiet but explosive conflict at Ferrari.

Hamilton’s move to Ferrari was seen as the start of a new era. More than just a racing driver, Hamilton brought with him a legacy of speed, success, and a vision to transform Ferrari — an iconic team known for its tradition but also for its resistance to change. His ambition wasn’t just to win races; it was to build a legacy rooted in collaboration, diversity, and modernization.

Yet, what seemed like a promising new chapter has turned into a complex, tense puzzle. Hamilton’s once optimistic journey at Ferrari is now clouded by rumors of betrayal and internal discord, the epicenter of which involves Christian Horner, Red Bull’s formidable team principal and Hamilton’s long-time rival.

The Unspoken Conflict

There has been no official outcry or public confrontation. Instead, an eerie silence pervades Ferrari’s paddock — a silence loaded with meaning for those who understand Formula 1 politics. No statements, no denials, just a suspicious calm that hints at deeper troubles.

Hamilton’s instincts have always been sharp, and he has sensed something amiss. Ferrari is reportedly caught between two competing forces: the existing leadership under Fred Vasseur, whom Hamilton initially trusted to steer Ferrari’s revival, and a growing influence of Christian Horner, who is rumored to be engaging in secret talks with Ferrari’s top brass.

Horner, no stranger to high-stakes political maneuvering, is a symbol of relentless control and efficiency — values that clash sharply with Hamilton’s inclusive, humanistic vision. His reputation as a leader who demands obedience and prioritizes rigid structure over open dialogue paints a picture of a Ferrari that could soon lose its soul.

Old Rivalries, New Battlegrounds

The backdrop to this drama is the intense rivalry that marked the 2021 season. Hamilton and Max Verstappen, Horner’s protégé, battled fiercely on track, but the real fight unfolded off it. Horner’s relentless criticism of Hamilton’s style, personality, and position as a champion created psychological and emotional strain on Hamilton. Those wounds, though hidden from the public eye, have left deep scars.

Now, the thought of Hamilton and Horner working not as rivals but as teammates, under the same Ferrari banner, seems like a narrative ripped from a thriller. It’s a powder keg waiting to ignite — two men with histories too fraught for easy cooperation, competing not just against other teams but for influence inside Ferrari itself.

The Quiet Coup

Ferrari finds itself at a crossroads. Vasseur, once seen as the future architect of the team, faces mounting criticism in the Italian media. Words like “weak” and “directionless” are bandied about, coinciding suspiciously with Horner’s rumored back-channel communications.

This pattern is familiar in the ruthless world of Formula 1 politics. First, discredit the current leader. Second, introduce an alternative with a stronger grip on power. Third, leverage the media to build pressure and sway public opinion.

Hamilton, a veteran of this game, recognizes the signs. His role in Ferrari’s story is shifting — from visiona

Ferrari’s Ident

For Ha

Horner’s vision threatens this ideal. His style, based on control and efficiency, risks turning Ferrari into a machine that wins races but loses its identity. Hamilton’s fear is not just about losing the championship but losing the very heart of what Ferrari stands for.

The Atmosphere Inside Ferrari

The tension is palpable. No shouting matches or dramatic clashes, just a shift in the atmosphere. Mechanics exchange guarded looks, engineers speak in clipped tones, and meetings are weighed down by unspoken mistrust. Even the usually mundane seconds on radio channels feel heavy with significance.

This is a team divided by philosophy — Hamilton’s hopeful, collaborative approach versus Horner’s cold, centralized command. In Ferrari’s history, such opposing visions have often led to fractures. Now, only one can prevail.

Hamilton’s Reality Check

Hamilton is no stranger to the brutal realities of Formula 1 politics. His experience with Mercedes and Red Bull has taught him that on the grand chessboard of the sport, drivers are often pawns.

He sees the writing on the wall: his dreams for Ferrari are not fully embraced. His role is diminishing, his influence waning. He’s become a symbol rather than a strategist, a face rather than a force.

What Lies Ahead?

Ferrari’s silence only deepens the intrigue. Without clear statements, the team’s future is uncertain. When trust fades in Formula 1, the countdown begins — not if, but when change will come.

If Horner’s influence grows, Ferrari may become a more dominant racing force. But the cost could be a loss of integrity and soul, something Hamilton cherishes deeply.

For Hamilton, this isn’t just a professional setback; it’s a personal betrayal. His passion and vision, once welcomed, now seem like mere decorations in a larger political play.

Conclusion: A Battle Beyond the Track

The saga of Lewis Hamilton at Ferrari is a stark reminder that Formula 1’s fiercest battles are often fought in shadows — in whispers behind closed doors and in the subtle shifts of loyalty and power.

As the season unfolds, the paddock watches not just the races but the unfolding drama that could reshape Ferrari’s identity and Hamilton’s career. Will the team find unity and embrace Hamilton’s vision, or will the cold efficiency of Horner’s approach prevail, pushing Hamilton to the sidelines?

One thing is clear: in the high-stakes world of Formula 1, speed alone does not win. It’s the politics, the alliances, and the silent power struggles that often decide the future.

Full Video:

McLaren’s Gamble: Why Letting Norris and Piastri Fight Could Define — or Destroy — Their 2025 Season

In Formula 1, there’s a game even more dangerous than overtaking at 300 km/h. It’s not in the braking zones or the strategy rooms. It’s in the hearts of the team principals who decide — or refuse — to let their drivers race each other.

It’s called “letting them fight” — and history shows it’s a gamble few survive unscathed.

Mercedes tried it. Red Bull never dared. But McLaren? Zak Brown just rolled the dice.

At a time when most teams would enforce strict team orders, McLaren has taken a wrecking ball to conventional wisdom. In an era dominated by hierarchy and control, Brown has given Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris equal machinery, equal opportunity — and zero instructions to hold back.

With just eight points separating them in the Drivers’ Championship — Piastri with five wins, Norris with four — and the Constructors’ title practically locked up for McLaren, the British team now stands at the precipice of history. But in letting both drivers chase the crown, they’re also flirting with the chaos that once tore apart the most powerful dynasties in the sport.

Because make no mistake: when two alpha drivers are allowed to race freely, the line between teammate and rival is paper-thin — and flammable.

The Precedent: Lessons from the Past

Formula 1 history is littered with wreckage from intra-team warfare. Hamilton vs. Rosberg at Mercedes nearly tore the team apart despite delivering titles. Senna vs. Prost at McLaren became the blueprint for dysfunction. Even Red Bull, known for its ruthless dominance, never truly allowed Webber to challenge Vettel — or Pérez to touch Verstappen.

Because at some point, every team principal learns a harsh truth: it’s easy to win with one star. It’s chaos with two.

And yet, Zak Brown isn’t backing down.

The Flashpoints: Austria, Canada, Silverstone

The warning signs have already flashed. In Austria, Norris and Piastri came within millimeters of disaster — brake dust flying, smoke swirling, egos colliding. In Canada, it was Norris who overcooked it fighting his teammate, costing himself a podium. And at Silverstone, Piastri flinched first. Norris took the win. But it wasn’t a masterclass — it was a gift.

McLaren insists there’s no need for intervention. Brown’s mantra? “Let them race.” But how long can that last?

As the stakes rise, the margin for error evaporates. And if you’re racing wheel-to-wheel with a title on the line, the concept of “equal teammates” doesn’t just fade — it combusts.

The Stakes: A Title Within Reach — and a Team on the Line

Right now, McLaren has the fastest car on the grid. The Constructors’ title is nearly in the bag. But individual glory — the one thing drivers chase more than anything — hangs in the balance.

Let’s be brutally honest: Team orders are the easy way out. They sanitize the racing, calm the garage, and preserve the brand. Red Bull enforces them early. Mercedes uses data to dictate hierarchy. Ferrari, at its worst, let politics kill performance.

But Brown isn’t following the script.

He’s betting on something rare: that personality can coexist with performance, that two driven racers can push without imploding. He’s betting on the culture McLaren has rebuilt — one of trust, transparency, and total driver parity.

And maybe, just maybe, he’s willing to risk burning the house down to prove McLaren is built different.

The Human Factor: Trust, Ego, and the Tipping Point

Zak Brown insists the dynamic between Norris and Piastri isn’t toxic. That they respect each other. That this won’t become Hamilton-Rosberg 2.0.

But Formula 1 doesn’t care about good intentions. It only respects results.

Right now, every mistake is magnified. Every podium missed is a title slipping through fingers. As the final stretch of the season approaches, what happens when a driver feels they were compromised — not by strategy, but by their own teammate?

What happens when “may the best man win” starts feeling unfair?

That’s when respect turns to resentment. That’s when team spirit gives way to silent warfare. And that’s when the perfect, polished picture of McLaren 2.0 could either crack under pressure — or be immortalized in glory.

The Bigger Picture: Why This Fight Matters

This isn’t just about two drivers. It’s about what kind of sport fans want Formula 1 to be.

In an age of engineered dominance and DRS trains, pure, raw racing is a rare gem. And McLaren, for better or worse, is offering that to the world. No scripts. No pecking order. Just two elite drivers with a title in reach, willing to go to war — even if the battle is in their own garage.

To some, it’s madness. To others, it’s the soul of motorsport.

Because here’s the truth: if McLaren pulls this off — if Norris and Piastri take it to the wire without imploding — it won’t just be a championship. It will be a revolution.

Final Laps: The Road Ahead

The final races will test everything: composure, strategy, and unity. But mostly, they’ll test Zak Brown’s conviction.

If Piastri gets aggressive in Mexico, will the team step in? If Norris feels he’s been sacrificed in Abu Dhabi, will the harmony survive? When one driver loses by three points, will they still believe it was fair?

Because when the dust settles, only one man gets to hold the trophy.

And no matter how loud the fans cheer, only one will walk away feeling like the hero — the other, like the nearly man.

Conclusion: Blood, Not Balance

In the end, this is what racing is supposed to be: visceral, unpredictable, and fiercely human. And McLaren’s decision to embrace the chaos — to let their gladiators go toe-to-toe — might just be the most thrilling thing in Formula 1 today.

The fuse has been lit. The outcome is uncertain.

But one thing is clear: this isn’t just about winning. It’s about proving that real racing still exists.

And if it means a few sparks — or even a few crashes — then so be it.

After all, history remembers the fighters.

Full Video:

Scroll down to hear what Christian Horner thinks of Lewis Hamilton

CHRISTIAN HORNER is jobless for the first time since 2004 after his brutal Red Bull sacking last week.

The 51-year-old is now on gardening leave for the rest of the year and will be weighing up his options from January 2026.

6

Christian Horner could be back in F1 next year after his Red Bull gardening leaveCredit: AFP

6

Horner has had huge success with Red Bull but was brutally sacked last weekCredit: Getty
Rumours have been swirling around over the Brit’s potential destinations – including a shock move to Ferrari.

Reports in Italian and German media begun claiming in May that Ferrari boss Fred Vasseur’s position is under threat.

Vasseur hit out at the reports and said they were “disrespectful” and “very harsh”.

But German outlet BILD has added fuel to the fire, claiming that Ferrari had made “informal” contact with Horner.

Horner dismissed the report – but speculation will continue to grow as the weeks go by with him sitting on the sidelines.

Come the Belgian Grand Prix later this month, Horner will be missing from the F1 paddock for the first time in nearly 21 years.

And Horner, who won six constructors’ championships and eight drivers’ titles with Red Bull, will no doubt be getting itchy feet soon.

If Horner did pen an unlikely move at Ferrari it would see him form a wild pairing with his old rival, seven-time world champion Lewis Hamilton.

Hamilton has a Ferrari contract until at least the end of 2026 and is already a huge voice within the Italian team.

It is likely he would not be impressed if Horner replaced Vasseur, given he is a big fan of the Frenchman and has thrown his support behind him in public.

When Vasseur’s future was under speculation, Hamilton said: “I love working with Fred – Fred’s the main reason I’m in this team and got the opportunity to be here, for which I’m forever grateful for, and we’re in this together.

“We’re working hard in the background, things aren’t perfect but, for me, I’m here to work with the team but also with Fred.

“I want Fred here. I do believe Fred is the person to take us to the top, so that’s that. So it’s all nonsense.”

Bad blood

Hamilton took a strong take on Horner’s alleged ‘inappropriate behaviour’ with a female colleague last year.

The ex-Red Bull boss was twice cleared from it by an independent investigation but Hamilton said it was “hanging over the sport” and said the outcome was “important for the future of F1”.

He also hit out at Horner in 2023 for “stirring” when he claimed Hamilton tried to join his team after leaving Mercedes.

At the time Horner said that a member of Hamilton’s team had been in touch over a possible switch to Red Bull earlier in the year.

Hamilton rebuffed it and said Horner had actually been the one to text him and try set up a meeting.

Obviously there was bad blood going back between the two during Hamilton and Max Verstappen’s fierce and controversial title fight in 2021 which reached its crescendo in the contentious season finale in Abu Dhabi.

6

There is speculation Horner could replace under-fire Fred Vasseur at FerrariCredit: Getty

6

Horner could find himself in a frosty partnership with Lewis HamiltonCredit: Getty

6

There is still some bad blood after Max Verstappen’s controversial world title win over Hamilton in 2021Credit: AP

Hamilton changed his tune

Recently, with Horner still at Red bull, Hamilton admitted he regretted referring to Red Bull as a “drinks company” in 2011.

His comments suggested that he is previous beef with Horner was water under the bridge.

At Silverstone he said: “Many, many years ago, I remember saying something about Red Bull being only a drinks company.

“I always regretted it because I was just saying that Mercedes at the time were great.

“I was really just trying to gee up my team. But the truth is, Red Bull have been an incredible team. There are so many people there that are exceptional and they’ve dominated for years.”

Horner makes his feelings on Hamilton known

It feels like Horner would have no qualms working with the British 40-year-old, who he has praised in public this season.

Speaking earlier in the year, Horner said of Hamilton’s Ferrari move: “I’ve seen some pictures, I think it [Ferrari red] suits him.

“It’s great for Formula 1. Lewis Hamilton in a Ferrari – that really is box office.

“I think it’s just another dynamic for this year that could be super exciting.”

Back in 2023, Horner was asked whether he would sign Hamilton for Red Bull.

He replied: “What Lewis has achieved in F1 is second to none, but we’re very happy with the drivers that we have – they’re committed as a pair for not only this season but the next season as well.

“I can’t see where we would be able to accommodate Lewis, but I’m sure they’re [Mercedes] going to sort their issues out and we’re certainly not writing him off yet.”

Christian Horner was relieved of his duties as Red Bull Racing team principal and chief executive last week after 20 years in charge of the F1 team and 14 titles

Christian Horner is no longer Max Verstappen’s team boss at Red Bull Racing(Image: AP)

Martin Brundle believes it is “obvious” that Max Verstappen and his closest allies played a part in the downfall of Christian Horner. The long-serving team principal and chief executive of Red Bull Racing was sacked by the Austrian energy drinks company last week after 20 years in charge.

Horner oversaw 14 Formula 1 titles during that period, including eight drivers’ championships – four each secured by Sebastian Vettel and Max Verstappen – and six teams’ standings successes.

But the final 18 months of his tenure were both professionally and personally difficult. On track, a strong start to 2024 laid the foundation of Verstappen’s fourth drivers’ title in a row, but their performance dropped off as the season progressed while McLaren emerged as the new dominant force on the grid.

That all came after Horner was accused by a female colleague of ‘inappropriate behaviour’, which he denied. He was cleared by an external KC hired by Red Bull to investigate the allegation, but his enemies saw their chance to try to orchestrate his downfall.

One of his most vocal critics was Jos Verstappen, who publicly called for Horner’s head and was happy to regularly brief friendly journalists. Sky Sports pundit Brundle referenced that as he gave his insight into the situation while speaking on The F1 Show podcast.

He said: “Obviously, Team Verstappen had been briefing certain journalists and Christian has just come more and more under pressure, and he lost key people like Adrian Newey, like Rob Marshall, like Jonathan Wheatley.

“I think his failing on that was convincing himself and trying to convince everybody else that they weren’t really doing that much anymore, and it really didn’t matter, he’d got a better crew behind them. But that wasn’t correct, and I think we’ve seen [that].

“But, let’s remember, this is a team that was on pole position last weekend in Silverstone, one of the toughest circuits in the world, and have won two Grands Prix this year. It’s not exactly like it’s been a disaster and they completely non-performed.

“But I think there were too many things working against him, and I think eventually… He had a lot of support from [Red Bull majority owner] Chalerm Yoovidhya and I think eventually that has faded away, and the inevitable has happened.”

Horner has been succeeded in both his former roles by Laurent Mekies, who steps up from his previous post as team principal at Racing Bulls. The Frenchman has, in turn, been replaced at the sister outfit by Alan Permane who was previously sporting director.