Author: bang7

Red Bull’s Bold Belgian Gamble: Masterstroke or Missed Opportunity?

When Formula 1 teams head to Spa-Francorchamps, they know to expect the unexpected. The Belgian Grand Prix is often a chaotic cocktail of high-speed drama, unpredictable weather, and high-stakes decisions. This weekend was no exception, with Red Bull Racing choosing strategy over supremacy in what may turn out to be either a tactical masterstroke or an overambitious miscalculation.

The shock headline? Max Verstappen, F1’s reigning dominant force, qualified only P4. In isolation, that might seem like a surprising slip—but in reality, it’s the result of a deliberate and daring gamble. Red Bull sacrificed qualifying speed to prepare their car for one critical variable: rain.

A Setup Built for the Storm

Let’s backtrack. On Saturday, Verstappen was in imperious form during the sprint. In bone-dry conditions, he ran a low-downforce setup and obliterated the field, overtaking Oscar Piastri with ease thanks to superior straight-line speed. The car was trim, efficient, and rapid—the clear class of the field.

But then came the twist.

Instead of sticking with the proven sprint-winning formula, Red Bull pivoted. For Sunday’s Grand Prix, they dramatically increased the downforce on Verstappen’s car, sacrificing top-end speed for grip and stability. Why? The Spa weather forecast showed a high likelihood of rain. Red Bull was building a car for a storm—before a drop had even hit the circuit.

The Red Bull Rationale

At first glance, the decision seems counterintuitive. Why change a winning setup? The answer lies in risk management and long-term payoff. As new Red Bull chief Laurent Mekies explained, this wasn’t just a last-minute tweak—it was a fully committed strategy aimed at dominating in the wet.

“We’re not begging for rain,” Mekies admitted, “but we made choices in the car thinking about it.”

Spa’s legendary microclimates make weather forecasting a dark art. You can have sunshine at La Source and a downpour at Stavelot. It’s that very unpredictability that makes committing to a wet setup so risky—and so potentially rewarding. In high downforce trim, Red Bull’s RB20 would struggle to match the raw speed of McLaren or Ferrari in the dry. But in the wet, it could become untouchable.

Strategic Sacrifice

The trade-off was clear: Red Bull would lose straight-line speed but gain in cornering grip and tire management. That decision bore immediate consequences. While the McLarens locked out the front row and Charles Leclerc snuck into P3, Verstappen ended up just 0.003 seconds behind the Ferrari—proof of how fine the margins are at the top.

Despite the small gap, Verstappen’s car was visibly less planted in the dry. Red Bull insiders hinted at tire pressure challenges and a lack of balance in Q3. Dr. Helmut Marko went so far as to say, “Max had no grip on any of his runs.” Not ideal—but not unexpected either.

A Game of Weather Roulette

So now the gamble is on. Two very different scenarios could play out on Sunday:

Scenario 1: It Rains.

This is Red Bull’s dream. The higher downforce setup will give Verstappen’s RB20 immense grip and confidence in the slippery conditions. Combine that with his rain mastery—a skill honed in countless chaotic Grands Prix—and the setup could turn P4 into an easy victory.

In the wet, drivers in low-downforce cars (likely McLaren) will struggle for traction and stability, while Verstappen may look like he’s driving on a different track altogether. The team’s choice to build for the storm could become a tactical masterstroke, especially if rain hits mid-race when chaos tends to reign.

Scenario 2: It Stays Dry.

This is the risk. If Sunday is dry throughout, Red Bull’s setup may become a handicap. Their straight-line deficit—estimated at 4 km/h slower than McLaren—could make overtaking difficult, especially on Spa’s long straights like Kemmel.

Verstappen won’t be able to simply power past rivals like he did in the sprint. Instead, he’ll need to rely on tire management, strategy, and surgical precision. Fortunately, those are strengths of both Verstappen and Red Bull. Their belief is that even without top-end speed, they can manage tires better and possibly run a different race strategy to claw back time.

Verstappen: The X-Factor

At the heart of all this is Max Verstappen. Red Bull is betting on his unique ability to drive through adversity, adapt to changing conditions, and maximize whatever car he’s given. Whether it’s a car trimmed for speed or one bloated with downforce, Verstappen has consistently wrung out performance others can’t find.

He may need to get creative with overtakes, use the high downforce to accelerate better out of corners, and extend tire life to open up alternative strategies. He might not have the rocket ship he had in the sprint—but he has the skills to deliver the result regardless.

McLaren and Ferrari: The Opposing Forces

McLaren’s front row lockout shows they’ve optimized for dry conditions. They’ll be fast early, but potentially vulnerable if the rain comes. Ferrari’s Leclerc seems to be straddling a middle ground—not quite as aggressive as McLaren, not as conservative as Red Bull—perhaps the perfect compromise if conditions are mixed.

If it’s a dry race start with rain later, Ferrari may find themselves well-positioned to adapt. In full wet or full dry, however, they might struggle to match the extremes of Red Bull or McLaren.

Opening Laps: Critical Moments

The first few corners at Spa often shape the race. Verstappen’s high downforce could hinder him on the run to Les Combes, but give him a traction advantage through Sector 2. Patience and opportunism will be key.

But if rain begins mid-race? That’s the moment Red Bull is waiting for. A wet track will flip the race dynamic on its head—and Verstappen’s car will suddenly come alive.

Genius or Gamble?

So, is Red Bull’s Spa strategy a masterstroke or a misstep? We won’t truly know until Sunday. If rain falls, they may look like strategic savants. If it stays dry, they’ll need every ounce of Verstappen’s brilliance to convert a compromised setup into a race win.

But that’s the beauty of Formula 1. It’s not just about who’s fastest—it’s about who’s smartest. Who dares to make the bold call. And right now, Red Bull is daring to think beyond the qualifying sheet.

Whatever happens, the Belgian Grand Prix promises to be a fascinating case study in F1 strategy, risk-taking, and trust—both in data and in a driver who might just be the best of his generation.

So… will Red Bull’s wet-weather bet pay off? We’re about to find out.

Full Video:

Lewis Hamilton’s Nightmare at Spa: A Wake-Up Call for Ferrari’s 2025 Season?

The 2025 Belgian Grand Prix weekend has delivered its fair share of drama, and at the heart of it lies the troubled tale of Lewis Hamilton’s qualifying disaster—an episode the seven-time world champion himself described as “unacceptable.” As Charles Leclerc shone for Ferrari with a front-row-worthy performance, Hamilton’s struggles reflect a troubling dichotomy within the team and raise critical questions about Ferrari’s ability to deliver consistent results amid technical upgrades and internal reshuffling.

A Shocking Exit

Lewis Hamilton’s dismal 16th-place qualifying result sent shockwaves through the paddock. A track limits infringement during his final Q1 lap wiped out his time and ensured an early exit from the session. The sting of that elimination was sharpened by the fact that Hamilton had already suffered through a lackluster sprint qualifying session the day prior, finishing 18th after a rare rear-locking spin—an incident he described as a career first.

What made the situation more frustrating for Hamilton and his fans was the promising pace Ferrari had seemingly unlocked. While Hamilton faltered, teammate Charles Leclerc qualified fourth for the sprint and third for Sunday’s main race. Hamilton accepted responsibility but made clear he was wrestling with deeper internal challenges—both technical and psychological. “It’s a very, very poor performance from myself,” Hamilton said. “I’ve got to apologize to my team because it’s unacceptable to be out in both Q1s.”

Technical Woes and New Dynamics

One of the underlying issues appears to be Ferrari’s latest car setup, including new components aimed at boosting performance. Yet, Hamilton was quick to point out that these changes hadn’t helped him find comfort or consistency. “The car didn’t feel terrible, but we had to put a second set of soft tires just to get through Q1,” he revealed. This lack of trust in the car’s behavior—especially under braking—appears to have undermined Hamilton’s confidence.

Another layer to Hamilton’s struggles is the evolving relationship with his Ferrari engineer, Riccardo Adami. Unlike the well-oiled partnership Hamilton enjoyed with Peter Bonnington (“Bono”) at Mercedes, the current communication seems less harmonious. Sky Sports analyst Ted Kravitz noted the stark difference in tone during their radio exchanges, suggesting Adami offered little emotional support during Hamilton’s qualifying crisis. “It didn’t sound like a Lewis and Bono situation,” Kravitz observed.

Such dynamics matter. A top-level driver-engineer relationship isn’t just about strategy—it’s psychological. Trust, reassurance, and clear communication can define a driver’s ability to perform under pressure, especially when adapting to a new car and team culture.

The Leclerc Contrast

While Hamilton struggled, Charles Leclerc capitalized. He qualified third for Sunday’s race and has consistently shown the ability to extract performance from Ferrari’s upgraded SF-25, despite downplaying expectations. Leclerc’s success exposes a paradox: the same car yielding two very different outcomes for its drivers.

Ferrari brought a revised rear suspension to Spa, touted as a game-changing development. Leclerc acknowledged the improvement, citing enhanced stability and predictability. “It’s a little bit better, and that’s what helped me this weekend to be a bit more consistent,” he said.

However, Leclerc was also cautious. “Yes, it’s an upgrade and a step in the right direction, but we are still speaking about very fine differences,” he added. The gains, while measurable, have not closed the gap to front-runners like McLaren. Leclerc qualified just 0.003 seconds ahead of Red Bull’s Max Verstappen, yet remained over four-tenths off Lando Norris’s pole time.

Ferrari’s Upgrade Gamble

For Ferrari, the 2025 season has been one of high hopes and modest returns. The team has introduced upgrades, including the much-discussed rear suspension, aiming to address tire degradation and aerodynamic instability. While some progress has been made, the results have been uneven.

Leclerc emphasized that although the upgrades were working, Ferrari remains several tenths off McLaren’s pace. “Compared to the McLaren, I think we are probably on average three to four tenths behind in qualifying,” he stated. This margin is significant, particularly when fighting for podiums in a season where even small gains can shift the balance of power.

Ferrari’s challenge now is not just technical but organizational—ensuring that both drivers are equally equipped to deliver results. Hamilton’s inability to adapt to the new setup suggests Ferrari still lacks the flexibility or foresight to cater to different driving styles, something the top-tier teams like Red Bull and Mercedes have historically managed well.

Can Hamilton Bounce Back?

For Lewis Hamilton, Spa was meant to be a resurgence. Instead, it turned into a reckoning. “I have no clue about tomorrow,” he said on Saturday, sounding unusually resigned. Still, he acknowledged that “anything can happen” with rain on the forecast—offering a sliver of hope for redemption through bold strategy or safety car fortune.

That said, Hamilton’s larger concern seems to be systemic. He admitted that the team’s focus is shifting toward next year’s car, implying that no major upgrades are left for 2025. That’s a sobering thought for a driver of Hamilton’s pedigree, especially as he adjusts to a new environment at Ferrari after a long, dominant spell at Mercedes.

It’s worth noting that great champions are often at their most dangerous when written off. Hamilton has rebounded from worse—mechanical failures, controversial penalties, even mid-season slumps. But to mount a comeback in 2025, he’ll need more than just his own talent. He’ll need Ferrari to deliver a car that suits him and a team that fully understands how to bring out his best.

The Bigger Picture

The drama at Spa reveals much about the state of Ferrari. While the team continues to be a symbol of hope for fans worldwide, its ability to compete at the front is hampered by inconsistency, strategic missteps, and a lingering inability to extract the best from both drivers. Hamilton’s nightmare weekend is not just a personal failure—it’s a symptom of Ferrari’s larger structural issues.

Meanwhile, Charles Leclerc’s solid results show what’s possible with the right setup and mental clarity. But even his optimism is tempered by realism. The car is better, yes—but not yet good enough to challenge for consistent wins.

As the paddock moves on from Spa, all eyes will be on whether Hamilton and Ferrari can learn from this painful chapter. If they do, it could mark the start of a remarkable comeback story. If not, it might just be another missed opportunity in Ferrari’s long and turbulent quest for championship glory.

Full Video:

Welcome to F1 News: Inside the F1 — Spa Sprint Shocker Sets Up a Championship Shake-Up

What an absolutely wild and unpredictable start to the Belgian Grand Prix weekend at Spa-Francorchamps. The Sprint Qualifying session wasn’t just a curveball — it was a full-on shockwave. From massive upgrade packages to big-name failures and the rise of a new star, this weekend has already thrown the F1 world into chaos. The big question now: what does it all mean — not just for the sprint race, but for the trajectory of the 2025 season?

Let’s break it all down.

A Wave of Upgrades in a Risky Format

Sprint weekends traditionally see teams tread cautiously. With just one practice session before heading into competitive sessions, there’s rarely enough time to evaluate significant technical changes. But not this time.

Eight out of ten teams brought meaningful upgrades to Spa — a testament to the intensity of the 2025 development war. From Red Bull’s so-called “mega package” to Ferrari’s sweeping rear suspension redesign, teams took huge gambles to try and claw back crucial performance at a high-speed circuit that lays bare any car weakness.

Red Bull, aiming to ward off McLaren’s charge, introduced updates across nearly every part of the car — new front wing, reshaped sidepods, revised suspension, and more. Ferrari focused on a complex rear overhaul, hoping to solve their instability issues and boost traction. McLaren continued refining their successful floor design with a new rear wing, while Williams, Mercedes, Aston Martin, Alpine, and even Racing Bulls all showed up with new components — a clear sign that no one is settling, even as the season grinds on.

But the big question remains: did these upgrades deliver?

Sprint Qualifying: A Minefield for Big Names

One look at the Sprint Qualifying session made it clear — upgrades don’t guarantee results. Far from it.

Mercedes were perhaps the biggest losers of SQ1. Promising young driver Andrea Antelli spun into the gravel and failed to set a competitive time. Meanwhile, George Russell couldn’t find pace in SQ2 and bowed out early. With a new front wing to evaluate and crucial constructor points on the line, it was a nightmare scenario.

Ferrari didn’t fare much better. Lewis Hamilton, driving the upgraded SF-25, suffered a shocking spin — possibly due to rear instability. Was it driver error, or is there a fundamental issue with their brand-new rear suspension? Either way, starting from the back in the sprint race means Hamilton faces a mammoth recovery challenge.

Albon, Tsunoda, Ocon, and both Aston Martins also underperformed, caught out by changing track conditions and a fast-evolving surface. The likes of Hülkenberg and Gasly showed potential but couldn’t string together full laps.

The Midfield Surges… But the Front is a New Story

The midfield is as close as ever. Standout performances from Carlos Sainz in the Williams, both Haas drivers, and Bottas for Sauber suggest that the upgrades are helping some teams close the gap. However, despite these promising runs, a glaring fact remains: the top-tier pace is still out of reach. Even the best of the rest were over a second behind the front runners — a chasm in F1 terms.

Oscar Piastri: The Star of Spa

And then came the true headline: Oscar Piastri.

The young Australian didn’t just top Sprint Qualifying — he dominated. With blistering pace in every sector, he finished a staggering 0.6 seconds ahead of teammate Lando Norris and an incredible four seconds clear of Max Verstappen.

That’s not just a fast lap. That’s a statement.

Even more striking is the consistency of Piastri’s speed throughout the weekend. While Norris struggled with setup, Piastri looked completely at home, his McLaren glued to the track. Yes, he’s known to perform well at Spa, but this performance went beyond talent — it was clinical, calculated, and commanding.

What About Max?

Max Verstappen — a Spa specialist with three wins here and armed with a heavily upgraded RB21 — couldn’t match Piastri’s time. He did what Max does best, securing a solid P2 and beating Norris, but it was clear: the McLaren — in Piastri’s hands at least — had the edge.

For a driver of Max’s caliber, at a track he dominates, this result is as much a wake-up call as it is a challenge. The Red Bull package is good. But Piastri was just better.

What Does This Mean for the Sprint and the Season?

With so many top drivers and teams starting out of position, the sprint race is poised to be absolute chaos — and thrilling chaos at that.

Expect aggressive driving from the likes of Hamilton, Russell, and even Leclerc, who all need to fight through the pack to salvage data and points. The midfield is packed, and with a track like Spa that encourages overtaking, we could see plenty of on-track action.

But beyond the immediate battle, this Sprint Qualifying session has potentially reshaped the championship narrative:

Oscar Piastri’s rise: This might be the moment we look back on as Piastri’s arrival not just as a contender for podiums, but as a genuine team leader and future title challenger. If he continues this form, McLaren will have a decision to make.

Norris under pressure: While consistent and talented, Norris now finds himself clearly second-best at Spa. How he responds to this intra-team challenge could define McLaren’s season — and his long-term future there.

Ferrari’s conundrum: If the new suspension proves flawed or hard to dial in, they may have sacrificed reliability for theoretical performance gains. Hamilton’s spin hints at deeper problems they need to solve — fast.

Mercedes meltdown: After showing some recent upward momentum, this was a cold splash of reality. Questions over car balance, driver confidence, and whether their upgrades were premature will dominate their debrief.

Red Bull’s vulnerability: Max is still Max. But the aura of untouchability might be cracking, especially if McLaren and Piastri keep this pace up.

Final Thoughts: A Shift in the Landscape?

What we saw in Sprint Qualifying at Spa was more than just a shake-up in grid positions. It may be a pivot point in the 2025 season.

Oscar Piastri didn’t just beat his rivals — he redefined expectations. Is this a one-off perfect lap on a favorite track? Or are we witnessing the emergence of a new elite driver ready to challenge the established order?

At the same time, questions loom large for the sport’s titans — Red Bull, Ferrari, Mercedes. Will their upgrades deliver consistency? Can they respond to the growing threat from McLaren?

One thing’s for sure — Spa has delivered. And with the sprint race still to come, the drama is far from over.

Stay tuned. F1 just got a lot more interesting.

Full Video:

The SF-25 Crisis at Spa: A Hidden Mechanical Meltdown Behind Hamilton’s Shock Exit

When Lewis Hamilton suffered a shocking early exit from sprint qualifying at Spa-Francorchamps, the motorsport world assumed the worst—driver error. After all, even seven-time world champions have off days. But what if the truth was far more complex? What if Hamilton’s off wasn’t a lapse in concentration, but the tip of an iceberg hiding a critical systems failure inside Ferrari’s ambitious new SF-25?

Welcome to a story of rear axle lockups, unspoken glitches, and the kind of mechanical drama that top teams usually work overtime to conceal. Today, we unravel the layers behind a moment that could redefine the 2025 Formula 1 season.

The Incident: A Sudden Lockup That Defied Logic

It began like any other qualifying lap. Hamilton, ever the tactician, launched into a flying lap with surgical precision. As he approached the iconic Bus Stop chicane—one of the most critical braking zones on the calendar—something unexpected happened.

The rear axle locked up without warning. There was no telltale smoke or visible oversteer. Just a sudden, surgical collapse of grip. In an instant, the lap was lost. No theatrics. No driver overreach. Just silence, and then Hamilton calmly pulling into the garage.

What followed was telling. There was no anger, no frustration. Hamilton, known for his emotional highs and lows, displayed a technical calmness. He walked straight to the data screens—not to check his time, but to analyze telemetry. To understand what really went wrong.

Ferrari’s Evasive Response: A Deafening Silence

Publicly, Ferrari said almost nothing. A few vague comments about setup sensitivity and evolving track conditions. No mention of mechanical errors. No acknowledgment of what looked to analysts and fans alike as something much deeper.

For a team famous for its analytical precision, this silence was almost louder than words. There was no detailed technical debrief, no transparent explanation—just enough to deflect questions without satisfying curiosity.

This isn’t uncommon in Formula 1. When something goes wrong at the system level, top teams often bury the truth deep within corporate language and PR gloss. But in this case, the telemetry wouldn’t let the truth stay buried for long.

What Really Happened: A Domino Effect of Failures

Digging into the data revealed a sequence of interconnected failures that exposed an alarming flaw in Ferrari’s design. It began with gearbox backlash—a subtle delay during downshifts due to imperfect gear engagement. Normally, this would be manageable. But not in a car like the SF-25, where every system is interlinked.

The delayed gear engagement caused a disruption in the Energy Recovery System (ERS) timing. The ERS, tasked with recovering and deploying hybrid energy, failed to activate in sync. This, in turn, threw off the brake-by-wire system.

When Hamilton hit the brakes, the system didn’t respond correctly. The rear brakes took on more force than designed, the axle locked up, and Hamilton’s lap collapsed under the weight of a system spiraling out of sync.

Former F1 driver and analyst Anthony Davidson flagged strange vibrations during downshifts, while Martin Brundle called it what it was: a mechanical failure, not a driver error. Hamilton wasn’t out of control. The car was.

A Pattern of Problems: The SF-25’s Fragile Core

This wasn’t a one-off. Spa was simply the first time the SF-25’s flaws could no longer be hidden. Earlier in the season, small signs had begun to show—unsettled braking, inconsistent corner entries, and mysterious de-coupling in driver feedback. These were brushed off as teething problems typical of a new car. But now, seen through the lens of Spa, they look like early warning signs.

The SF-25 is a technical marvel on paper—aggressive aero upgrades, lightweight components, and an integrated hybrid powertrain. But its core systems appear unable to communicate reliably under pressure. When pushed to the edge, rather than achieving synergy, they begin to cannibalize each other’s performance.

Ferrari may have overstepped, chasing innovation at the cost of reliability. That’s a risky trade, especially when you’re gunning for a world championship with a driver like Lewis Hamilton at the wheel.

Hamilton’s Response: A Champion Seeking Answers

Hamilton’s post-session behavior told its own story. No theatrics. Just questions. His gaze stayed locked on telemetry screens, highlighting anomalies and requesting data. This wasn’t frustration—it was technical concern. The kind that only a veteran with over 300 Grand Prix starts would recognize.

He knew the car hadn’t failed randomly. It had failed systematically. And when systems fail without warning, that’s not just dangerous—it’s destabilizing.

When a driver like Hamilton begins to quietly question the machinery beneath him, it sends ripples through the garage. Engineers, team principals, even partners begin to notice. And in a high-stakes environment like Ferrari, where performance is everything, quiet tension can quickly become a crisis.

Ferrari’s Gamble: Innovation vs. Execution

Ferrari’s SF-25 project was a gamble. A car built to break Mercedes and Red Bull dominance through sheer performance evolution. And it shows—when the SF-25 works, it’s lightning fast. But that speed seems to come at the cost of mechanical coherence.

If the systems can’t stay in sync under pressure, the car becomes unpredictable. And unpredictability is fatal in a sport where consistency defines champions.

Their muted response after Spa suggests one of two things: either they don’t have a fix yet, or they don’t want to admit the scale of the problem. Neither is reassuring.

What It Means for the Championship

Hamilton came into 2025 with something to prove—a legacy to cement, and a shot at title number eight with a new team. But a car that breaks down in the spotlight isn’t just a technical issue; it’s a psychological one.

If the SF-25 continues to falter, Hamilton’s championship aspirations could fade before the season hits its midpoint. Worse, it could begin to strain his relationship with Ferrari—one built on trust, belief, and the shared dream of making history.

Final Thoughts: Crisis or Catalyst?

Spa might be remembered as the turning point of Ferrari’s 2025 season. Not because of a crash, but because of a malfunction that exposed deeper flaws. The SF-25 now stands at a crossroads. Fix the synchronization issues, and it could yet become a world-beating machine. Fail to do so, and it might go down as one of Ferrari’s great missed opportunities.

As for Hamilton, his response has shown why he’s more than just a fast driver—he’s a student of the sport, a technician, and above all, a leader. Whether this moment marks the beginning of a legendary comeback or the slow unraveling of a dream project remains to be seen.

But one thing is certain: what happened at Spa was no ordinary mistake. It was a warning. And now, the entire F1 world is watching.

Full Video:

The Belgian Grand Prix sprint was one to quickly forget for Lewis Hamilton who suffered a qualifying shocker in his Ferrari which scuppered his chances of points

Lewis Hamilton suffered a Belgium sprint to forget(Image: Getty Images)

Lewis Hamilton blamed “a new component” on his Ferrari for the spin which scuppered his chances of points in the Sprint race at Spa-Francorchamps. The first of two races at this weekend’s Belgian Grand Prix saw the seven-time Formula 1 champion finish well outside the points.

He managed a few overtakes over the 15 laps but never had a realistic chance of making it to the top eight after a qualifying disaster. Hamilton suffered a SQ1 exit, qualifying just 18th because of an unusual spin he suffered while on his final flying lap of that first part of the session.

The Brit had almost completed his full lap when it all unravelled at the final chicane. The rear end of his Ferrari span out unexpectedly and team principal Frederic Vasseur later confirmed that his driver had made a crucial error under braking.

Hamilton claimed afterwards that it was “the first time, I think, in my career”, that he had spun out in that way. He also said he was “massively frustrated” by what had happened and that his car’s performance was “not great”.

Having slept on it, and then participated in a largely uneventful sprint race, Hamilton pointed his finger at an upgraded part that is on his car for the first time this weekend for causing the spin that cost him the chance to fight for points.

He said: “We understood [the problem]. We’ve got a new component on the car that Charles [Leclerc, his team-mate] had in Montreal, and he’s had it for a few races, but that’s the first time I’ve had it.

“Charles, you remember, he crashed with it in Montreal, and then I had the same experience in my first run with it yesterday.” He offered little more detail, other than to suggest that the brakes themselves were not the problem.

He added: “The brakes felt pretty good. I ultimately braked straight in the same position [in qualifying] as I did in [first practice] but a little bit more pressure and it snapped the rears. So I understood it, got a bit of running [with] it just now and hopefully that won’t be a problem – hopefully.

Ferrari have more upgrades this weekend which Leclerc felt improved the car, though he said the team remains some way off the pace of the front-running cars. He said: “I felt the changes, but the thing is that today the gap is huge. I’m sure we did a step forward, but for some reason the McLaren seems to be even faster than usual around this track.

“So it’s a bit disappointing on that side of things, but I think what we were searching for with those upgrades, we had it. It’s just a shame to have such a difficult qualifying session, especially in terms of gaps.”

Oscar Piastri was beaten to Belgian Grand Prix pole by McLaren team-mate and F1 title rival Lando Norris who wants to further narrow the gap between them in the championship

Lando Norris starts on pole at Spa-Francorchamps(Image: Formula 1 via Getty Images)

Lando Norris is eyeing back-to-back ‘home’ race wins on Sunday after the perfect qualifying follow-up to his British Grand Prix triumph. The Brit’s first career win at Silverstone last time out saw him celebrate wildly with his family.

And he hopes to do so again in the homeland of his mother, Cisca, who watched on with glee as her half-Belgian son, 25, took pole position in the Ardennes Forest. Norris was more than half-a-second slower in Sprint qualifying than team-mate and title rival Oscar Piastri on Friday but got the better of the Aussie on Saturday for the one that really mattered.

“I did not have to change much, I just had to drive a little bit better and that was it,” he reflected. “I just drove a tiny bit better and I just had a bit of a slipstream. [On Friday] I did not have a slipstream and it cost me three-and-a-half tenths, so it makes a big difference.”

Norris had started and finished third in that Sprint race earlier in the day, and so knows full well that pole isn’t always the best place to begin at Spa-Francorchamps. The long flat-out section after the first corner gives a huge slipstream, as Piastri found out when Max Verstappen stole the lead on lap one.

The Dutchman had enough pace in his Red Bull to keep the McLarens behind over the 15-lap dash. But at 44 laps the Grand Prix is nearly three-times longer and Norris refuses to believe that starting at the front is a disadvantage.

He said: “I would be stupid and there is no point in me being here if I did not think that I could win. I am here to win and, whatever the conditions are, that is my target.”

Piastri, nine points ahead in the title race, felt he should have made it two poles in the same weekend but “a pretty big mistake” cost him. He said: “I felt like the potential was there and it is always frustrating when you feel like you can do it and you don’t. That is how it goes sometimes, unfortunately.

“I feel like I have done a good job, just unfortunately not when it mattered today. But I feel like the pace has been really strong all weekend, so I am confident for tomorrow.”

Verstappen’s Sprint win for Red Bull saw life under new boss Laurent Mekies get off to the perfect start. He admitted he had to do “15 qualifying laps” to keep the quicker McLarens behind and “drove over the limit” for much of the race. And from fourth on the grid today he is not confident he can repeat the trick, no matter what the weather does.

Verstappen said: “Overall, it’s not been a very good qualifying. I think it will be tough. If it’s wet then you can’t see anything, so you can’t do anything on lap one. I hope we can fight back to the podium, but we need to be realistic and work on our own balance.”

Ferrari suffered their first Q1 elimination in qualifying for a Grand Prix since 2023 when Lewis Hamilton broke track limits on his final run at Spa-Francorchamps and had his best time deleted

Lewis Hamilton suffered a brutal early exit in qualifying for the Belgian Grand Prix. The Brit thought he had secured safe passage through to the second part of the session until the Formula 1 stewards intervened and deleted his quickest lap time.

Hamilton was sat in the bottom five and needed to perform with his final run. And he seemed to do exactly that with a time which catapulted him up to seventh on the timesheets and comfortably secured his passage into Q2.

Or so he thought. Shortly afterwards, it was confirmed that the stewards had taken a closer look at his lap and deleted it, concluding that he had exceeded the limits of the Spa-Francorchamps track by having all four wheels over the white line while navigating the famous Eau Rouge and Raidillon section of the Belgian track.

Cameras on board his Ferrari offered evidence that was inconclusive, though they showed that the wheels on the right side of the car were close to the white line that marks the limit of the track. The FIA confirmed that it was a static off-board camera which had shown that the seven-time F1 champion had fully gone off the circuit.

Hamilton seemed unaware at first that his lap was in danger, but became suspicious when he heard very little from his race engineer on his way back to the garage. “Is everything okay?” he asked over the radio, before the bad news was shared with him.

“Track limits at turn four,” came the reply from Riccardo Adami. Hamilton then sounded agitated as he asked: “Am I out?” The Ferrari engineer then confirmed that was the case, replying: “Yeah, lap time is deleted.”

Hamilton found himself down in 16th place on the timesheets as a result of the deletion of his best lap. It marked the first time a Ferrari has failed to progress from Q1 in a qualifying session for a full Grand Prix since Carlos Sainz in 2023.

And yet, it was the second time this weekend that Hamilton had endured a qualifying disaster. He also fell at the first hurdle when setting the grid for the Sprint race, spinning at the final corner while on his flying run to ensure that he would not get the chance to set a time good enough to progress.

For that spin, Hamilton blamed a new upgrade on his Ferrari that he was not familiar with. “We understood [the problem]. We’ve got a new component on the car that Charles [Leclerc, his team-mate] had in Montreal, and he’s had it for a few races, but that’s the first time I’ve had it,” he said. “Charles, you remember, he crashed with it in Montreal, and then I had the same experience in my first run with it yesterday.”

Hamilton offered little more detail, other than to suggest that the brakes themselves were not the problem. He added: “The brakes felt pretty good. I ultimately braked straight in the same position [in qualifying] as I did in [first practice] but a little bit more pressure and it snapped the rears. So I understood it, got a bit of running [with] it just now and hopefully that won’t be a problem – hopefully.”

The Belgian Grand Prix is the first Formula 1 race since the end of the 2004 season that has not been attended by Christian Horner who was axed as Red Bull boss last week

Christian Horner has been replaced at Red Bull by Laurent Mekies

Formula 1 has a personality problem, because another one of the sport’s biggest names – and mouths – disappeared when Red Bull unceremoniously dumped Christian Horner last week.

It was a very strange sight yesterday looking at the Red Bull pit wall and, for the first time in 406 F1 races, not seeing Horner poring over the data. He is a divisive figure of course but, love him or loathe him, the 51-year-old played a key role in F1 which is as much soap opera as it is sport these days.

Through Drive to Survive and social media, F1 has built itself a massive new audience in recent years by putting the sport’s personalities in the shop window. But, one by one, the ones that resonated most with people are disappearing.

Daniel Ricciardo was the darling of Netflix but looks done with F1 after his own Red Bull axing last year. Bombastic team boss Guenther Steiner was also popular but rubbed owner Gene Haas up the wrong way and so he was kicked to the kerb last year.

At least fun-loving Finn Valtteri Bottas, off the grid this year, is still being used by Mercedes as a social media star as well as their reserve driver. Oh, and he’s pretty much set to be back racing next year with F1 newcomers Cadillac.

But Horner will be another dearly missed personality – even if you didn’t like him, and many didn’t, he made for a great pantomime villain. His replacement Laurent Mekies is an experienced and well-respected operator, but a much more dry personality.

The Frenchman is the latest technically-minded boss of one of F1’s highest-profile teams, along with engineer Andrea Stella at McLaren and power unit expert Andy Cowell at Aston Martin. Put simply, as teams hunt for every drop of performance, the nerds are taking over.

At least Toto Wolff is still alive and kicking at Mercedes, though he seemed genuinely sad to see the back of Horner when he spoke about the absence of his arch-nemesis yesterday. But F1 has built its growth in recent years not on the racing itself, but on the likeability of the key figures that drive the sport. And with fewer larger-than-life characters involved these days, F1’s popularity may suffer for it.

Every time Lando Norris busts up his nose, something special happens. He cut it partying in Amsterdam before his maiden F1 win in Miami last year, and sliced it open again at Silverstone earlier this month as he celebrated his first victory on home soil.

Maybe the best way for the Brit to see off title rival Oscar Piastri is to make sure he keeps getting smacked on the snout. If Tyson Fury decides against reversing his boxing retirement, perhaps Lando has a job for him.

From the archive

George Russell secured his first F1 podium in Belgium in 2021, having mastered heavy rain to qualify second in his Williams before torrential downpours saw the race called off after just two laps.

George Russell surprisingly podiumed for Williams at Spa in 2021(Image: Getty Images)

Fast fact

Max Verstappen has gone fastest four years in a row in qualifying at Spa – but only started on pole in 2021 having taken grid penalties in each of his last three visits to Belgium.

Inside track

New team Cadillac want experienced duo Valtteri Bottas and Sergio Perez to fill their two race seats in their debut season, but have yet to agree a deal with either. Both are also being considered by Alpine.

Betrayal at Spa: Has Ferrari Broken Hamilton’s Trust for Good?

In the high-stakes, high-speed world of Formula 1, drama is never far from the surface. But every so often, a race weekend delivers more than just the usual on-track action. It reveals cracks—some technical, others deeply personal. That was the case at the 2025 Belgian Grand Prix in Spa-Francorchamps. There, under steel-colored skies and a track laced with uncertainty, Lewis Hamilton, a seven-time world champion, encountered something far worse than a mechanical failure or a botched pit stop.

He experienced betrayal—not from a rival, nor from the elements, but from within the very team he trusted to give him one last shot at glory: Ferrari.

A New Chapter That Wasn’t

Hamilton’s move to Ferrari was meant to be a fairy-tale final act. After over a decade of dominance and records with Mercedes, he joined Ferrari with a promise of renewed ambition and mutual belief. For Ferrari, it was the acquisition of a titan—someone who could reignite their championship hopes. For Hamilton, it was a shot at cementing his legacy by reviving the Scuderia’s former glory.

Instead, Spa 2025 may be remembered as the weekend it all began to unravel.

Chaos in the Fog

There was no collision, no mechanical explosion. The trouble came subtly, wrapped in mist and rolling tension, much like the track itself. The sprint qualifying session should have been an opportunity for Hamilton to regain footing in a tough season. Ferrari had arrived with new rear suspension components designed to restore grip and stability.

But they also brought risk.

With only one practice session before qualifying in the sprint weekend format, the margin for error was razor-thin. Despite this, Ferrari placed Hamilton at the forefront of their experimentation. On paper, it was a show of trust; in reality, it was a gamble—one that cost dearly.

Midway through a hot lap, Hamilton lost the rear end at the Bus Stop chicane and spun into the gravel. It looked minor at first, but the implications were anything but.

Silent Storm

Hamilton’s reaction was uncharacteristically subdued: “I spun… Not great.” Those two sentences echoed with a weight that only experience can carry. This was not a rookie mistake, nor an ordinary setup failure. It was a moment that spoke volumes. Hamilton later clarified that a rear lockup caused the spin—remarkably, the first of its kind in his career spanning over 330 races.

More than the loss of control, it was the loss of trust.

A Formula 1 car is not just machinery. To a driver of Hamilton’s caliber, it is an extension of body and mind. When that synergy fractures, so does confidence. The SF-25 had stopped communicating. It no longer obeyed Hamilton’s instincts. Instead of being his sword, it became his saboteur.

A Mechanical Mystery

While engineers scrambled to analyze telemetry, Sky F1’s Martin Brundle highlighted a disturbing noise prior to the incident—a metallic clunk that could indicate deeper mechanical misalignment. Anthony Davidson went further, suggesting gearbox backlash, a clear symptom of internal instability. It was no longer just a bad setup. Something in the Ferrari’s core might be breaking down under pressure.

And it wasn’t limited to Hamilton.

Other drivers reported instability in the rear. Yet, none suffered Hamilton’s fate. The difference? He was the one carrying Ferrari’s experimental hopes on his shoulders. He was the guinea pig.

The Uncomfortable Contrast

As Charles Leclerc cruised confidently to a front-row start, Hamilton sat 18th, metaphorically and physically sidelined. The visual was stark—and symbolic. One Ferrari driver basked in a stable setup, while the other floundered, sacrificed on the altar of premature development.

The paddock began to murmur: was Ferrari developing a car for two drivers, or quietly pivoting toward Leclerc alone?

If true, the implications are severe. Hamilton was not brought in to play second fiddle. He came to win, to lead, to finish his career on his terms. If he feels that his input is undervalued or his role marginalized, the damage won’t be confined to points lost—it could fracture the team’s entire vision.

A Deeper Crisis

This isn’t just about a spin or a failed upgrade. This is a philosophical crisis at Ferrari. In their desperation to leap ahead, they are taking shortcuts in development, rolling the dice with incomplete data, and compromising driver trust. In F1, that is a formula for disaster.

Ferrari’s dilemma is now clear. Push ahead with their current, unstable development path and risk alienating the most decorated driver in F1 history—or retreat, reassess, and reestablish internal harmony before the season spirals out of control.

But time is Ferrari’s worst enemy.

The season moves relentlessly forward. The spotlight intensifies. Every failure becomes a headline. And Hamilton didn’t come to Maranello for patience. He came to win.

The Beginning of the End?

It’s no exaggeration to say that Spa 2025 could be the beginning of the most dramatic fallout Formula 1 has seen in decades. Ferrari’s gamble with Hamilton’s setup and their silence afterward has not gone unnoticed. Fans, analysts, and insiders alike are now watching the Scuderia with suspicion.

In Formula 1, betrayal is rarely loud. It doesn’t arrive with a declaration—it creeps in. It shows up in missed meetings, vague statements, strategy calls that don’t make sense, or a lack of eye contact in the garage.

And in the case of Hamilton, it comes in two quiet sentences.

“I spun. Not great.”

Not great might be the understatement of the season. It might be the coded language of a champion signaling that enough is enough.

What Comes Next?

Ferrari must act, and act fast. Apologies won’t suffice. They need structural changes, a renewed commitment to parity between their drivers, and a re-evaluation of how they integrate upgrades into race weekends. More importantly, they must regain Hamilton’s trust—because once that’s gone, no amount of horsepower or aerodynamics can bring it back.

Lewis Hamilton has never been one to walk away quietly. If Ferrari doesn’t change course, he may not wait for the final race of the season—or even the end of his contract. He’s not just fighting for podiums anymore. He’s fighting for purpose.

The storm clouds that gathered over Spa may soon sweep across the entire paddock. Whether they bring renewal or ruin will depend on Ferrari’s next move.

And as F1 has shown time and again, sometimes the biggest crashes happen off the track.

Full Video:

Max Verstappen’s Future Beyond Red Bull: Mercedes Door Closes, But Aston Martin Could Still Be in Play

As the Formula 1 world edges closer to a major regulatory shift in 2026, the future of its biggest star, Max Verstappen, remains a topic of intense speculation. A four-time world champion and the face of Red Bull Racing’s recent dominance, Verstappen’s contract saga is taking a new twist with Mercedes publicly closing the door on a potential collaboration, at least according to team principal Toto Wolff.

Toto Wolff’s Clear Stance

Despite weeks of rumors and sightings of Wolff and Verstappen in Sardinia that fueled speculation, Wolff put a definitive end to the discussions—at least publicly—by expressing his commitment to a future led by George Russell and young prodigy Kimi Antonelli. In his words, “The direction of travel is that we want to continue with George and Kimmy. That’s the first priority.”

This statement not only squashes the possibility of Verstappen donning Mercedes overalls in 2026, but it also outlines a vision where Mercedes invests in long-term continuity rather than bringing in an outsider—even one as successful as Max. From a team-building perspective, it’s a logical move, especially as Russell continues to mature and Antonelli shows promise as the future face of the team.

Verstappen’s Casual Response

Verstappen, never one to get rattled easily, responded coolly to Wolff’s comments and the rumors that had circulated. When asked about the shared Sardinia sighting, Max dismissed the idea that it implied contract talks, joking, “There are more people on the island than just me and Toto and the family.”

He also reiterated that he remains content with Red Bull for now: “The target was that when I signed my deal, I would drive here until the end of my career.” However, the key word here is “target”—not “certainty.” Verstappen is clearly leaving the door open, even if he’s not slamming it shut on his current team.

Red Bull’s Own Uncertainty

The 2026 regulations, which include a radical revamp of power units and chassis design, are looming large. Red Bull’s new partnership with Ford for its in-house powertrain is untested, and early reports suggest it may be one of the weaker packages when matched against established engine manufacturers like Mercedes, Ferrari, and the incoming Audi.

Add to that the internal shake-ups at Red Bull, including the departure of Christian Horner and other key personnel, and it’s understandable why Verstappen would consider his options. While he claims Horner’s exit hasn’t influenced his loyalty, it’s naive to think such monumental changes wouldn’t at least prompt some reflection.

Exit Clause Looming

There’s an additional wrinkle in Verstappen’s contract: a performance clause. If Red Bull’s competitiveness significantly drops, Verstappen reportedly has the option to activate an exit clause. The trigger may be as specific as falling 18 points behind Russell in the next two races, which would place him fourth in the driver standings. If this happens, 2026 could be a turning point.

Aston Martin: The Dark Horse?

With Mercedes out—for now—the next potential suitor is Aston Martin. But even that possibility is murky. The Silverstone-based outfit has made strides with Fernando Alonso and Lance Stroll, but long-term, Alonso is expected to retire soon, and Stroll’s seat is only as secure as Lawrence Stroll’s investment.

If Aston Martin can present Verstappen with a compelling technical package post-2026, they may be a serious contender. With strong financial backing and a growing technical staff, the team could become the surprise challenger of the new era. But again, that depends entirely on the performance of the new regulations.

Internal Mercedes Tensions?

Interestingly, it seems the story with Mercedes may not be entirely closed. Reports suggest that Mercedes CEO Ola Källenius might be willing to go behind Wolff’s back to secure Verstappen, believing the star driver could be the final piece in restoring Mercedes’ dominance. This kind of power struggle, if true, shows just how valuable Verstappen is in the current F1 landscape.

If internal pressure mounts within Mercedes leadership, it’s possible that Wolff’s current stance may be challenged—especially if the team’s early 2026 performance falters or if Antonelli doesn’t live up to the immense hype surrounding him.

Brundle’s Take: Stability in 2026, Change in 2027?

Veteran F1 pundit Martin Brundle has also weighed in, suggesting Verstappen will stay at Red Bull through 2026. In his conversation with the Dutchman, Brundle emphasized that Verstappen’s primary interest is driving a fast car—regardless of the badge on the nose cone.

Brundle noted, “I think Her’s exit means he’ll now stay. I’m certain he’ll now stay at Red Bull for 2026 and see what happens.” It’s a logical conclusion. With so much change happening in 2026, Verstappen may decide it’s wiser to evaluate performance across the field before making any career-defining moves.

Loyalty vs. Legacy

At the heart of the matter is Verstappen’s legacy. While he’s already cemented himself among the greats with four championships, the next phase of his career will determine how dominant he can be in the long run.

If Red Bull falters, loyalty will only stretch so far. The best drivers in F1 history—from Ayrton Senna to Michael Schumacher to Lewis Hamilton—have all made strategic team changes that elevated their careers. Verstappen may have to follow suit if he’s serious about rewriting the record books.

Conclusion: A Waiting Game

For now, Max Verstappen is staying put, and the likelihood of a 2026 move to Mercedes is close to zero based on Wolff’s latest statements. But the chessboard is still in motion. With new regulations, shifting team dynamics, and potential political battles within Mercedes itself, nothing is off the table from 2027 onwards.

Aston Martin could rise. Mercedes could change its mind. Red Bull could falter—or flourish. And through it all, Verstappen will be watching and waiting for the car that can deliver him championship number five and beyond.

Because as Max himself said, “It’s all about having a fast car.” And wherever that car is, that’s likely where you’ll find him.

Full Video: