Author: bang7

The Formula 1 paddock has been buzzing with excitement, particularly around one major shift in leadership that could drastically change the direction of a dominant team. Red Bull Racing, currently one of the most successful teams in Formula 1, has just made a pivotal leadership change. The new team principal, Lauron Niki, has officially stepped into the role, marking the beginning of a new chapter for the team. What makes this change so significant is not only the timing—during the high-pressure Spa Grand Prix weekend—but also the way it reflects a larger shift in how teams are being managed in modern Formula 1.

The Pressure Cooker of Spa

This change is happening under intense pressure. The Spa Grand Prix weekend is a sprint weekend, which means that everything is condensed—fewer practice sessions, higher stakes, and no time to ease into a new role. But that’s not all. Alongside the leadership shift, Red Bull is facing a unique challenge: Max Verstappen’s longtime race engineer, GP, is absent for personal reasons. GP is an integral part of Verstappen’s team, often working as his right-hand man to analyze tire temps, brake bias, energy deployment, and much more. With GP absent, there is a massive gap in communication and coordination between Verstappen and his team, placing even more pressure on Niki to step up and fill this void.

A New Era of Specialized Leadership

The leadership shift at Red Bull is not just about replacing one person with another. The appointment of Niki seems to be part of a deliberate strategic shift that will redefine not only Red Bull’s future but possibly how all Formula 1 teams operate moving forward. Rather than following the traditional model of a charismatic, all-encompassing team principal like Christian Horner, Niki’s role has been carefully structured to focus solely on the race team operations. His responsibilities do not extend into areas like marketing or engine development, which were part of Horner’s broader portfolio.

This approach is highly specialized, aimed at streamlining Red Bull’s operational efficiency on race weekends. The goal is to maximize performance by dedicating the team principal’s full attention to the race car, driver communication, and the on-track strategy. This marks a stark contrast to the broader roles that team principals have traditionally held, overseeing not just the team’s racing operations but also marketing, commercial deals, and often even advanced technological developments.

A Deliberate and Focused Approach

Helmut Marko, a key figure at Red Bull, has voiced approval of Niki’s transition. He mentioned that conversations with Max Verstappen have been “hopeful,” which implies that Niki has successfully gained Verstappen’s trust and confidence. This rapid development of a strong working relationship with Max is crucial, as the driver-team principal relationship is vital in Formula 1. It influences everything from how data is communicated during races to the overall trust a driver has in his team’s strategic decisions.

However, it’s not all smooth sailing. Niki’s appointment comes at a time when Red Bull is also embarking on an ambitious project: the 2026 engine regulations. With the team moving towards designing and building their own engine in collaboration with Ford, there are concerns about how this will be managed. Niki’s focus on the race team, without direct involvement in the engine development process, means that there will need to be an incredibly tight and effective communication link between the two divisions. If the powertrain and race team aren’t perfectly aligned, it could undermine Red Bull’s performance, even if both are top-notch in their respective areas.

The Impact of the 2026 Engine Project

The 2026 engine regulations are a game-changer for Formula 1. Teams must adapt to new hybrid technology, sustainable fuels, and a shift in powertrain design. Red Bull, which has historically relied on suppliers like Renault and Honda for its engines, is taking a huge leap by developing its own power unit. This move is a major shift for the team and presents a massive technical challenge. While Niki will focus on race operations, the performance of the engine will be critical to the car’s overall performance. If the powertrain doesn’t integrate seamlessly with the chassis, it could lead to performance compromises, even if both components are great on their own.

This is where Red Bull’s approach to leadership becomes even more significant. By segmenting the leadership roles, the team is betting on specialization and streamlined focus. However, success in Formula 1 isn’t just about having specialized experts in different areas—it’s about ensuring those experts work together as one cohesive unit. The engine project, while being led by a different division, is intrinsically linked to the team’s success. To succeed in the 2026 era, Red Bull will need a near-perfect collaboration between the race team and the powertrain team.

A Larger Trend in Formula 1

Niki’s appointment is not an isolated incident. Across the grid, Formula 1 teams are increasingly looking to engineers to lead their teams. McLaren’s Andre Stella is a prime example. His engineering background has helped the team make significant strides in terms of car development, pinpointing issues, and finding solutions quickly. This shift towards engineering leadership reflects the growing complexity of Formula 1 cars. Modern F1 cars are highly technical, requiring a deep understanding of every aspect of the machinery. An engineer at the top can bridge the gap between the driver’s feedback and the team’s technical needs, ensuring that all departments are aligned in their goals.

The trend is gaining momentum, with more and more teams recognizing the importance of having someone who understands the technical side of the sport at the top. This technical fluency allows team principals to communicate effectively with both the engineers and the drivers, translating real-time feedback into actionable data and decisions.

Max Verstappen: The Key to Red Bull’s Success

At the heart of Red Bull’s dominance is Max Verstappen. He is, without a doubt, the team’s most valuable asset. For Red Bull’s new leadership structure to work, it was crucial to ensure that Max’s relationship with Niki was smooth and effective. Thankfully, early reports indicate that Max has quickly built a good rapport with Niki, which is a positive sign for the team’s future. Max’s trust in the team principal is essential for continued success, especially as the team navigates the complexities of the 2026 regulations and the new powertrain project.

The Road Ahead: A Reset for the Future

Red Bull’s transition is happening against the backdrop of a major shift in Formula 1. With the 2026 regulations on the horizon, all teams are facing a reset of sorts. The new engine and powertrain regulations will change the landscape of Formula 1, and Red Bull’s decision to take control of their engine development is a strategic move to ensure they remain at the forefront of the sport.

This reset is not just about new leadership. It’s about restructuring the team to ensure success in the new era of Formula 1. By focusing on specialization and aligning their leadership structure with the demands of the sport, Red Bull is preparing itself for the future, with an eye on maintaining its dominance through 2026 and beyond.

Conclusion

The changes happening at Red Bull Racing are a reflection of the larger trends sweeping through Formula 1. As the sport becomes increasingly technical, teams are recognizing the importance of specialized leadership. Niki’s appointment as team principal, along with the focus on race team operations and the 2026 engine project, is a calculated move to future-proof Red Bull’s success. Whether this approach will lead to even greater dominance in the sport remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Red Bull is positioning itself for a new era, and it’s doing so with a clear focus on the technical challenges ahead.

Full Video:

Are Classic Wet F1 Races a Thing of the Past?

Formula 1 has long been known for its thrilling, high-speed races, but one aspect of the sport that often steals the spotlight is its ability to deliver intense, unpredictable, and challenging wet-weather races. These rain-soaked spectacles have provided us with iconic moments in F1 history, such as Michael Schumacher’s masterclass at Barcelona in 1996 or Lewis Hamilton’s victory at Silverstone in 2008. However, as Max Verstappen’s frustrations during the 2025 Belgian Grand Prix illustrate, the traditional “classic wet races” might be a thing of the past.

The Belgian Grand Prix: A Case Study of Wet Weather Challenges

The 2025 Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps serves as a stark example of the growing difficulties associated with wet-weather racing in modern F1. The race was delayed by over an hour, with visibility severely hampered during the formation lap. Despite the poor conditions, the decision was made to start the race behind the safety car. But after only a handful of laps behind the safety car, the race was reduced to just nine proper laps, with all drivers switching to slick tires after an initial stint on intermediates. The result? A very different experience compared to the unpredictable, intense wet-weather races F1 fans have become accustomed to.

Max Verstappen, one of F1’s most accomplished drivers, was particularly vocal in his criticism of the way the race was handled. Known for his exceptional skill in wet conditions, Verstappen thrives in the kind of tricky, unpredictable scenarios that once defined wet-weather racing. But in this instance, he felt that the conditions were mishandled, expressing his frustration at the delay and the lack of truly wet racing.

Why the FIA Took the Cautious Route

The decision to delay the race and limit the wet-weather conditions is partly a response to the growing concerns about safety. As F1’s governing body, the FIA is constantly striving to balance the excitement of racing with the safety of both drivers and spectators. In previous events like the 2025 British Grand Prix at Silverstone, drivers voiced their concerns about visibility in wet conditions. After that race, the FIA was under pressure to act with more caution, throwing up safety cars and red flags sooner rather than later to prevent dangerous accidents caused by poor visibility.

In the case of the Belgian Grand Prix, the wet conditions were indeed dangerous in specific sections of the circuit, particularly around the notorious Eau Rouge and Raidillon corners, where high-speed aquaplaning is a serious risk. The visibility at these locations, coupled with the long, fast straights, made the decision to delay the start appear prudent, even though it disappointed fans hoping for the traditional “classic wet race.”

The Evolution of Wet-Weather Racing Tires

Another contributing factor to the decline of true wet-weather racing in F1 is the evolution of the tire technology used in the sport. In the past, teams relied heavily on full wet tires during races in heavy rain. However, the modern wet-weather tire used in F1, while effective in some conditions, has limitations that affect its performance during less intense rainfall.

The primary issue with modern wet tires is their inability to maintain performance when the track dries quickly or when the rain becomes inconsistent. When conditions improve and visibility clears, the wet tire’s performance deteriorates, and drivers are forced to switch to intermediates or slick tires. This means that while a race might start in wet conditions, it may quickly turn into a race on dry tires, rendering the wet tire essentially pointless after just a few laps.

F1’s tire supplier, Pirelli, is aware of this issue and has been working to develop tires that are better suited for transitional conditions. However, the current generation of cars and tires isn’t designed to maximize performance in the kind of heavy, sustained rain that once made these races legendary.

Max Verstappen’s Discontent: A Desire for Real Wet Racing

Max Verstappen’s frustration is rooted in more than just the delay; it reflects his broader concerns about the direction F1 is heading when it comes to wet-weather racing. Verstappen, who won the 2016 Brazilian Grand Prix in a dazzling display of skill during a torrential downpour, thrives in these conditions. Wet races have traditionally offered a level playing field, where drivers’ talent can shine through despite the lack of grip and visibility. But as he pointed out, races are increasingly being treated as “dry races” that happen to start in the wet, with conditions quickly improving to the point where the race transitions to slick tires.

In Verstappen’s mind, this diminishes the spectacle of wet racing. He argued that F1 might as well wait until the track is fully dry before starting races if this trend continues. However, it’s important to note that his frustration is not about the weather itself but rather how modern F1 cars and tires struggle to cope with the conditions.

Is the “Classic Wet Race” Gone Forever?

While Max Verstappen’s comments may seem hyperbolic, they highlight a real shift in the nature of wet-weather racing in F1. Traditional wet races, where drivers are forced to adapt to rapidly changing conditions, no longer have the same impact as they once did. Modern F1 cars, with their increased downforce, complex aerodynamics, and tire limitations, are simply not suited to handle the extremes of rain that F1 races used to embrace. The technology has moved on, and while it has undoubtedly improved the safety and overall performance of the cars, it has also dulled some of the excitement that comes with racing in the wet.

The shift away from classic wet-weather races is not just a technical issue but also a cultural one. Wet races used to be a major part of the F1 calendar, with fans eagerly anticipating these chaotic, unpredictable events. But as conditions and technology evolve, it seems that true “wet racing” is becoming an increasingly rare spectacle.

The Impact on Fans and the Future of Wet Racing

For many fans, the absence of classic wet-weather races is disappointing. These races often represent the purest form of racing, where the skill of the driver and the ability to adapt to changing conditions were just as important as speed and strategy. Races like the 2008 British Grand Prix, where Hamilton triumphed in torrential rain, or the 1996 Spanish Grand Prix, where Schumacher’s Ferrari seemed untouchable in the rain, remain etched in the memories of F1 fans.

The modern trend of avoiding wet conditions or quickly transitioning to slick tires undermines the drama and excitement that these races once offered. However, there is hope that as F1’s tire technology and car designs continue to evolve, we might once again see races that push drivers to the limit in true wet conditions. The new generation of cars set to debut next year may offer a glimmer of hope, but for now, it’s clear that “classic wet F1 races” are increasingly becoming a thing of the past.

Conclusion

While wet-weather racing remains a part of Formula 1, the conditions that once made these races legendary are becoming less and less common. Advances in technology, the challenges of modern tire design, and increased caution regarding driver safety all contribute to a change in how wet races unfold. Whether or not the “classic wet race” will ever make a true comeback remains to be seen, but for now, fans and drivers alike are left to reflect on the lost spectacle of rain-soaked Grand Prix weekends.

Full Video:

The moments of defeat in Formula 1 are often layered with complexities that go beyond the immediate missteps on track. A perfect example of this happened at the 2025 Belgian Grand Prix, where Lewis Hamilton’s struggle at Spa-Francorchamps captured not only the technical challenges of the SF25 Ferrari but also revealed the psychological strain that comes from driving for a team so steeped in its own expectations and culture. The incident that truly shook Hamilton wasn’t a spin or a deleted lap time, but rather a quiet and cold radio message that was both technically precise and emotionally distant.

The Cold Silence of Communication

The key moment came after Hamilton had struggled through a difficult weekend at Spa. It wasn’t just the spin in the sprint shootout or the early elimination in Q1—it was the psychological toll of a communication that felt almost transactional. When Hamilton’s new race engineer at Ferrari, Ricardo Adami, radioed in to tell him that his lap was invalid due to track limits at Turn 4, the message was blunt, robotic, and void of the usual reassurance Hamilton had become accustomed to. It was a far cry from his years working with Pete “Bono” Bonington at Mercedes, a man who had become not just an engineer but a stabilizer during challenging moments. The coldness of the exchange left Hamilton, and by extension the viewers, with a sense of unease. There was no softening of the fall, no quiet empathy, just the harsh reality of a performance-based message.

This moment of silence, and the absence of the familiar comforting voice of Bono, symbolized a much deeper issue than just a technical mistake on track. It pointed to a significant mismatch in emotional chemistry between Hamilton and Ferrari. This was a team still figuring out how to support a driver who thrives not just on precision but on emotional stability and trust. It was a team that, while elite in its engineering, lacked the emotional agility to adapt to a driver as complex as Hamilton.

Technical Struggles and Psychological Strain

Hamilton’s Q1 exit was a direct consequence of Ferrari’s setup choices. The team had opted for a lower-downforce configuration on the rear wing to compensate for the power deficit when compared to the dominant Red Bull and McLaren teams. However, this configuration came with significant trade-offs. Hamilton’s telemetry showed that he entered Turn 4 at a higher speed than his teammate, Charles Leclerc, but with the car less stable in the rear due to the lower downforce. This caused Hamilton to push slightly beyond the track limits as he tried to recover from the car’s inherent instability.

It wasn’t an act of recklessness, but rather a reflection of Hamilton’s struggle to adapt to a car that didn’t feel entirely his own. In his quest to extract performance from the SF25, Hamilton had to overcompensate, and small missteps like the track limits violation were inevitable. What was more revealing, however, was the psychological toll this technical imbalance had on Hamilton. The car’s setup wasn’t just making it difficult to extract the maximum performance—it was undermining Hamilton’s confidence in his ability to drive it consistently at the limits. A driver like Hamilton, known for his smooth and fluid driving style, needs a car that he can trust, especially when the stakes are so high.

This lack of confidence in the car, compounded by the emotional distance from the team, created a perfect storm of frustration. As a result, Hamilton’s response to his elimination was not just an apology to the team, but an acknowledgment that something deeper was fraying beneath the surface. The disconnect wasn’t merely technical—it was emotional. Hamilton had long been used to a harmonious balance between him and his engineers, a connection that transcended mere instructions and moved into the realm of trust and understanding. At Ferrari, this emotional understanding was still in its infancy.

Ferrari’s Balancing Act

Ferrari’s 2025 car, like any F1 machine, thrives on precise setup configurations, but the SF25, in particular, is heavily tuned to the driving style of Charles Leclerc. It’s built to suit his preference for rear stability and confidence in medium-speed corners. For Hamilton, adapting to this setup has been a struggle. While Leclerc has found a rhythm in the car, Hamilton’s task has been to build trust in a system that doesn’t cater to his natural instincts. The margin for error is razor-thin, and when the setup isn’t perfectly dialed in for Hamilton’s driving style, mistakes like the one at Spa are inevitable.

For Ferrari, this creates a complex dilemma. They can’t just build a car around one driver’s preferences—they need to strike a balance. And as much as Ferrari’s engineering excellence is lauded, it has often struggled with adapting to the unique needs of its drivers. The team’s hierarchy, so ingrained in its culture, sometimes leaves little room for the flexibility and intuition that drivers like Hamilton need, especially when they are dealing with the psychological challenges that come with driving a car that isn’t fully responsive to their touch.

In this sense, Ferrari’s technical prowess becomes both an asset and a limitation. While they can design a car that performs on paper, making sure that car suits two drivers with very different driving styles—Leclerc’s more aggressive approach and Hamilton’s smooth, finesse-based style—requires more than just engineering. It requires communication, empathy, and a willingness to evolve in response to the driver’s needs. This, at its core, is where Ferrari’s challenge lies.

The Road Ahead

Looking ahead, Ferrari has little time to recalibrate. With the season progressing and teams like McLaren gaining ground, the pressure to find harmony within the team is mounting. The performance gap between Leclerc and Hamilton is only going to widen if this emotional disconnect continues. For Ferrari to remain competitive—not just in the drivers’ standings but also in the constructor’s championship—they need to ensure that their two-driver lineup is working in sync.

For Hamilton, the challenge is clear. He remains one of the most gifted drivers on the grid, capable of extraordinary feats when the car responds to his touch. But that’s only part of the equation. If Ferrari wants to get the most out of him, they will need to not only dial in the technical aspects of the car but also bridge the emotional gap that currently exists. This means rethinking the way they communicate, providing reassurance when needed, and recognizing that Hamilton, like all elite athletes, requires more than just a checklist of instructions. He needs a team that is emotionally fluent and capable of evolving with him.

If the partnership between Hamilton and Ferrari is to succeed, it must evolve beyond mere mutual respect. It needs to foster a deeper connection, built not just on performance but on trust, understanding, and emotional support. For now, Spa was a reminder of the fragility of this partnership. The team may have the speed, but without the emotional fluency to match it, Hamilton’s Ferrari chapter could face more hurdles ahead. And as we move toward Monza and beyond, the pressure to find that balance will only intensify.

Full Video:

Lewis Hamilton vs. The FIA: The Drama of the Belgian Grand Prix

Lewis Hamilton, the seven-time Formula 1 World Champion, found himself at the center of a firestorm following a shocking elimination in Q1 at the Belgian Grand Prix. His early exit left him visibly frustrated, not just with his own performance, but with the very governing body of the sport, the FIA. Hamilton’s scathing remarks about the FIA’s handling of track limits, along with his dramatic departure from the weekend, stirred up the Formula 1 community and raised important questions about consistency and fairness in the sport.

The Elimination: A Nightmare for Hamilton

Hamilton’s Q1 elimination at Spa was a bitter pill for the seasoned driver to swallow. A combination of a rough Friday, where he struggled during the sprint qualifying session, and his disqualification in Q1 placed him in an uncomfortable position on the grid. After enduring a day full of difficulties, this particular setback felt like the final straw. Hamilton was knocked out in 16th position, leaving him with little chance to recover throughout the rest of the weekend.

But the main source of his frustration wasn’t merely the result. Instead, it was the controversial track limits decision made by the FIA. Hamilton’s fastest lap time was deleted after it was determined that all four wheels of his car had gone beyond the white line at turn four. For a driver with as much experience and success as Hamilton, this felt like an unjust penalty.

The FIA’s Track Limits Controversy

The FIA’s track limits rule, which has been a consistent point of contention in recent seasons, played a central role in Hamilton’s elimination. In this instance, the governing body deemed that Hamilton had exceeded the track boundaries, invalidating his fastest lap. For a driver of his caliber, having his lap time erased due to a relatively small breach of track limits is frustrating, especially when similar laps earlier in the weekend were seemingly not penalized.

Hamilton wasted no time in voicing his displeasure with the decision. Speaking to the media shortly after his elimination, he openly criticized the consistency of the FIA’s rulings, calling the enforcement of track limits harsh and unpredictable. He pointed out that, during previous laps in the weekend, he had taken similar lines through turn four without facing any penalty. To him, the call felt like an arbitrary decision that cost him dearly. His direct and sharp criticism was a clear sign of his mounting frustration with the situation.

Hamilton’s Determination to Question the Decision

Hamilton didn’t back down. He questioned the rationale behind the FIA’s decision, insisting that he had followed the same line as before without issue. Even though the FIA later revealed they had access to additional camera angles to confirm the violation, Hamilton was still unconvinced. He admitted that the lap was his mistake but maintained that he still didn’t fully agree with the penalty.

This situation highlighted an ongoing issue within the sport: the inconsistency of track limits enforcement. While the FIA is tasked with maintaining fairness and consistency, many drivers, including Hamilton, have felt that certain calls seem arbitrary and unclear. This inconsistency often leads to confusion and frustration, especially when a single decision can have such a significant impact on a driver’s weekend.

The Radio Exchange: A Lack of Empathy?

The frustration Hamilton felt wasn’t only about the penalty. His post-penalty radio exchange with his race engineer, Ricardo Adami, further exacerbated his feelings. After crossing the line, Hamilton asked, “Is everything okay?” The response he received was blunt and impersonal: “Track limits, turn four, you’re out.” There was no empathy, no sign of support, and no attempt to offer comfort. This response starkly contrasted with Hamilton’s past experiences with his longtime engineer, Peter Bonington, at Mercedes. In the past, Bonington had a knack for offering a calming and supportive tone, even in difficult moments.

The lack of emotional support in this instance was noticeable. Sky Sports analyst Ted Kravitz noted that Adami’s flat, emotionless response made it seem like the human connection that is so vital in such tense moments was missing. This moment served as a reminder that Hamilton, despite his illustrious career, is still new at Ferrari, and the bond between driver and engineer takes time to develop. The lack of camaraderie and support made the situation sting even more for Hamilton, and it’s clear that his frustration wasn’t solely about the FIA’s decision but also about the emotional disconnect within his new team.

Charles Leclerc’s Positive Weekend

While Hamilton was grappling with the devastating news, his teammate Charles Leclerc enjoyed a much better weekend. Leclerc managed to qualify in an impressive P3, showing that the Ferrari car still had pace despite its ongoing struggles. Ferrari’s updates, including changes to the rear suspension, seemed to have had a positive impact on the car’s stability and grip, making Leclerc optimistic about the improvements.

Leclerc’s composed and calm demeanor was a stark contrast to Hamilton’s mood. While one side of the Ferrari garage was feeling confident, the other was visibly struggling. For Hamilton, it must have been difficult to watch Leclerc’s success when his own weekend was quickly descending into chaos. The disparity in performance between the two Ferrari drivers added more pressure to Hamilton, who was left wondering why the same car could deliver two such different outcomes.

Ferrari’s Shifting Focus to the Future

Looking at Ferrari’s broader strategy, it appears that the team is already turning its focus to the future, specifically the 2026 season. With the SF25 still lagging behind the front-running teams, including McLaren, Ferrari seems to be pivoting away from short-term results and focusing its resources on developing a stronger car for the upcoming seasons. Hamilton, however, hinted that the team has likely exhausted all possible upgrades for this year, making it clear that the focus is shifting toward long-term success.

This shift in focus is understandable given the team’s struggles this season. Ferrari has been constantly battling to find consistency and performance, but the reality is that they are unlikely to close the gap to the front-runners in the remaining races of the season. For drivers like Hamilton, who joined Ferrari with high expectations, this transition could prove difficult. However, the team’s long-term planning might be the key to ensuring a brighter future.

The Weather: A Possible Twist in the Tale?

Despite the overwhelming frustration, Hamilton is not completely ruling out a comeback. The forecast for race day calls for rain, which could provide an opportunity for a dramatic turnaround. Wet weather often shakes up the order in Formula 1, and unpredictable conditions can transform what looks like a disastrous weekend into a surprising opportunity. Hamilton himself acknowledged the unpredictability of F1, stating that “Anything can happen” in a race.

The rain could be a potential game-changer, giving Hamilton a slim chance to climb back up the order if Ferrari can execute the right strategy. As we’ve seen in the past, unexpected moments like these can create chaos and open up opportunities for the most prepared teams to capitalize. Hamilton is holding onto that hope, even if it seems unlikely.

Conclusion

The Belgian Grand Prix weekend has proven to be a frustrating and dramatic one for Lewis Hamilton. His elimination in Q1 and subsequent criticisms of the FIA have reignited the debate over the consistency and fairness of track limits enforcement in Formula 1. Meanwhile, Ferrari is facing its own set of challenges, with a team that is shifting its focus to long-term goals. For Hamilton, it’s a reminder that in Formula 1, nothing is ever guaranteed, and even the most seasoned drivers can face setbacks.

As the season progresses, Hamilton’s frustration will likely linger, and the sport will continue to wrestle with the issue of fairness and consistency. The pressure is building on all sides, and fans are waiting with bated breath to see what will come next. Will Hamilton’s frustration turn into a catalyst for change? Only time will tell.

Full Video:

Lewis Hamilton’s struggles at the Belgian Grand Prix continued as he failed to make it out of Q1 in qualifying, with his engineer Riccardo Adami coming in for criticism

Lewis Hamilton’s relationship with Riccardo Adami has come under scrutiny(Image: Formula 1 via Getty Images)

Ferrari engineer Riccardo Adami has faced criticism for his approach towards Lewis Hamilton. It came as the Brit suffered a torrid weekend at the Belgian Grand Prix, which included two Q1 exits in both qualifying sessions held at the Formula 1 Sprint event at Circuit Spa-Francorchamps.

Following a disappointing 15th-place finish in Saturday’s sprint race, matters worsened for the seven-time F1 champion when he encountered difficulties during qualifying. Hamilton set a rapid lap in Q1, but his time was subsequently scrubbed from the records.

He received a penalty for breaching track limits at the Raidillon corner, meaning he failed to progress to Q2. This left him just 16th on the timesheets before Ferrari confirmed hours before Sunday’s race that Hamilton would start from the pit lane.

Speaking over the radio, race engineer Adami seemed to display little compassion in the aftermath. When Hamilton enquired airwaves: “Is everything okay?” following his qualifying attempt, he received a curt response. “Track limits at turn four,” came the blunt reply.

After Hamilton questioned whether this meant he had been eliminated from Q1, the Italian responded: “Yeah. Lap time is deleted. P16.” Sky Sports F1 reporter Ted Kravitz highlighted Adami’s approach to that conversation as he discussed what had happened on his Ted’s Notebook programme.

He suggested that Hamilton’s previous engineer at Mercedes, Peter Bonnington, would have managed the situation with greater sensitivity. ‘Bono’ worked with the Brit for more than a decade and the pair had a strong rapport, which is something Hamilton has yet to find with Adami.

“Did you think it was a bit terse on the radio between him and Riccardo Adami, saying, ‘Is there something wrong?” Kravitz said. “I don’t know whether I expected a bit more empathy. To say, ‘Ah, I’m sorry, Lewis. Bad luck, mate. You’re out, hard one by, pal.’ The kind of things Bono would have said.”

Hamilton, 40, made no effort to hide his frustration afterwards, offering an apology to both his team and supporters as his difficult 2025 campaign rolls on. I’m just really sorry to the team,” he said. “Hard work with the filming day that we did, and all the preparation, and then you come here and don’t make it through Q1. It’s unacceptable. Really sorry.”

It is far from the first time the relationship between Hamilton and Adami has been questioned since his move to Ferrari. There were several examples of tense conversations between them over the radio earlier in the season which caused so much of a stir that the racer felt the need to speak publicly about how he is working with his new race engineer.

He said: “We’re constantly learning more and more about each other, we’re constantly adapting to the way both of us like to work. There’s a lot of speculation. I mean, most of it is BS. Ultimately, we have a great relationship. He’s been amazing to work with, he’s a great guy, working so hard – we both are – and we don’t always get it right every weekend. We have disagreements, like everyone does in relationships, but we work through them.”

Max Verstappen and Lando Norris were in opposition to one another before Sunday’s Belgian Grand Prix was even allowed to get underway due to safety concerns over the rain

Max Verstappen didn’t agree with rival Lando Norris when it came to how to deal with the wet track at Spa(Image: YVES HERMAN, POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Red Bull star Max Verstappen and McLaren counterpart Lando Norris were in conflict at the Belgian Grand Prix before the race could even get underway. That’s after the driver duo found themselves in opposition to one another in regards to dealing with the wet weather conditions.

The Belgian GP was delayed immediately after the formation lap due to safety concerns at the Circuit Spa-Francorchamps. Heavy rainfall in the Ardennes Forest left a lot of standing water on the track and meant the race’s start had to be pushed back.

Numerous drivers on the grid complained about the poor visibility. However, Verstappen took a different tack to Formula 1 nemesis Norris, who was sent into a frenzy at last year’s race, when it came to theories on how it should be dealt with.

Speaking over the Red Bull radio, the four-time world champion said: “Well that’s a bit silly, I mean, you should just run a few laps, Jesus. They’re way too cautious, now the heavy rain is coming, and then it’s going to be a three-hour delay.”

All vehicles completed the formation lap at 2pm UK time, which was when the race was scheduled to commence. However, drivers were soon reporting back to their teams that visibility was extremely poor, with a considerable amount of spray being kicked up.

Verstappen, 27, disagreed with the decision to stall the race and instead suggested staying on track to clear the water issue. Organisers decided it was best to pull the drivers back, however, as the wet conditions refused to let up in Belgium.

The FIA swiftly red-flagged the Grand Prix, directing all cars to return to the pit lane. It citing visibility issues as the reason as a statement read: “Most drivers have reported poor visibility during the formation lap, hence the red flag.”

Drivers complained of poor visibility at Spa after heavy rainfall(Image: AFP via Getty Images)

Norris, who had secured pole position at Spa, was among those voicing serious concerns about visibility over his team radio. While trailing the safety car, he informed his McLaren race engineer that his own visibility was minimal, speculating it would be even worse for those behind him.

While many drivers concurred with the decision, Verstappen was evidently not pleased with the call to postpone the race start. Lining up fourth on the grid, the Dutch ace made his preference to race clear despite the conditions.

As Verstappen highlighted, heavier downpours were approaching according to the weather radar. This is a frequent problem for the Belgian Grand Prix, with that particular region often experiencing unpredictable weather conditions.

Norris was among those who argued that a delay was the sensible move(Image: Peter Fox, LAT Imagesvia Getty Images)

The 2021 edition of the race notoriously ran for three hours despite completing just two laps, both conducted behind the safety car due to dangerous conditions. Since no overtaking was feasible, all drivers concluded in their qualifying positions, though only half points were awarded.

Alpine’s Pierre Gasly acknowledged the frequent issues experienced in this particular race as he commented during the delay: “I just hope we can go soon, for the fans. Here [at Spa] we’ve had a few situations where they’ve waited a long time in recent years.

“I’m pretty sure it’s going to start in the next 15, 20 minutes. Once this rain is gone it should be a good race, it should be exciting. It’s tricky conditions … I’ll fight as hard as I can. We are three positions away from the top 10 and I really hope we can make it.”

Lando Norris was left to rue his errors at the Belgian Grand Prix last year which proved costly in his title pursuit, and the McLaren star will hope for a better outcome this time around in Spa

Lando Norris spoke candidly about making too many mistakes after the Belgian GP last year(Image: PA)

Lando Norris knows exactly what he needs to do at the Belgian Grand Prix this weekend if he wants to become a Formula One world champion. The McLaren driver last year was left to rue his “stupid mistakes” at Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps, which dealt a huge blow to his 2024 title hopes.

This season, the 25-year-old finds himself embroiled in a more closely-fought battle with his team-mate Oscar Piastri in the drivers’ championship. Piastri’s 234 points means he holds a slender seven-point advantage over the Brit for now, though that deficit can quickly be overturned.

Norris will want to do just that after a disappointing finish to his race at Spa last year. He began the 2024 Belgian Grand Prix in fourth with his team-mate just behind, though he was still the favourite to win the race as championship-leader Verstappen received a ten-place grid penalty for exceeding his quota of internal combustion engine components.

However, Norris lost three places on the opening lap as he ran partially into the gravel on the first corner’s exit. Shortly afterwards, he botched a pass on Carlos Sainz.

Being trapped behind the Ferrari meant Norris was undercut by title rival Verstappen at the first stops. From there, the McLaren star had to chase the Red Bull to the finish, ending up just 0.6s down as Verstappen came up short of beating Ferrari’s polesitter, Charles Leclerc.

George Russell and Lewis Hamilton of Mercedes finished in first and second place, respectively, while Piastri finished third and Leclerc crossed the finish line in fourth. However, post-race checks revealed that Russell’s car was underweight, which sparked his disqualification and resulted in the other drivers moving up a place.

Still, fifth place behind Verstappen’s fourth marked a hugely disappointing end to the race and an opportunity missed to make up ground on the Dutchman – something Norris simply cannot afford to do again with his title battle with Piastri being so tight.

Norris was asked how much he needed a rest over the summer break immediately after the race, to which he replied: “I mean, we all needed it, but I think I just needed to reset.

Norris ran wide onto the gravel on Turn 1(Image: Getty Images)

“I’ve given away a lot of points over the last three, four races just because of stupid stuff – mistakes and bad starts, Turn 1 now. I don’t know why. It’s just silly things. It’s not even difficult stuff.

“It’s just… Turn 1, trying to stay out of trouble, trying to make sure there’s a gap and not get hit, and then I put myself off the track. Just some stupid things. The pace is good, the team are doing an amazing job so I’m happy.

“In a way I feel like I just don’t want to take a break – I just want to continue because we’re in good form. Even today I feel like the pace was very strong. The last two, three races I’ve just not clicked as much as I needed to and given up a lot of points, so hopefully I can come back strong.”

Discussing his costly La Source gravel-strike, Norris admitted he “just misjudged it, honestly”. He went on to add: “I just didn’t want to get taken out in Turn 1, so I left the gap and just misjudged the exit a little bit.”

Norris also opened up about the other mistakes which had caused big losses for the team. He sat on pole in Spain and Hungary but lost his position in Turn 1 and finished second in both races.

That proved important in him losing the championship to Verstappen, finishing 63 points behind the four-time champion in the drivers’ standings to miss out on his maiden title. Norris has won four races this year already, including the last two at the Red Bull Ring, Austria and Silverstone, Great Britain.

Hamilton’s nightmare Grand Prix weekend has gone from bad to worse

LEWIS HAMILTON will start from the pit lane for today’s Belgian Grand Prix after being slapped with a 60-PLACE grid penalty.

The seven-time world champion has endured a troubled weekend at Spa-Francorchamps and had been due to start 16th after he was eliminated in Q1.

1

Lewis Hamilton has endured a nightmare Belgian Grand Prix so farCredit: PA
However, Hamilton’s Ferrari team have confirmed he will start at the back of the pack after taking on a new power unit.

Three other drivers have also been slapped with hefty penalties for the Spa race.

Mercedes’ Kimi Antonelli and Aston Martin’s Fernando Alonso have both also had new power units installed – so will start from the pit lane.

Carlos Sainz, meanwhile, was ruled to have made unapproved adjustments to his Williams car – so will also start from the pit lane.

Heavy rain is threatening to wreak havoc once again in Belgium, with showers and thunderstorms forecast right in time for the start of the race too.

Hamilton described his performances so far this weekend as “unacceptable” after he started 18th and finished only 15th in the sprint race earlier and then failed to progress to Q2 in qualifying for Sunday’s main event.

Hamilton’s best lap was chalked off by the stewards after he ran all four wheels of his Ferrari off the circuit at Raidillon.

“I don’t agree (with the stewards’ decision), but I’m out,” said the 40-year-old. “It was another mistake from my side and I have to look internally.

“I have to apologise to my team because it is just unacceptable to be out in both Q1s this weekend. A very, very poor performance.”

Hamilton is without a podium for Ferrari – the deepest he has ever gone into a season without a top-three finish.

Toto Wolff Shuts the Door on Max Verstappen: Mercedes’ Bold 2026 Move Shakes Up F1’s Future

In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves through the Formula 1 paddock, Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff has confirmed the team’s 2026 lineup—George Russell and Kimi Antonelli—leaving four-time world champion Max Verstappen officially out of the equation. This surprise decision not only reshapes the 2026 driver market but also casts a massive question mark over Red Bull’s crumbling dynasty and Max’s long-term future in the sport.

Let’s break down the high-octane drama unfolding in the world of Formula 1 and examine whether Wolff’s decision is a masterstroke or a potential mistake that could come back to haunt Mercedes.

Mercedes Doubles Down on Youth: Russell and Antonelli for 2026

Toto Wolff’s announcement via Sky Sports ends months of speculation fueled by Verstappen’s rumored meetings with Mercedes executives and leaked photos from Sardinia. “George and Kimi are our 2026 priority,” Wolff stated unequivocally. That means no Max—despite his towering credentials and recent frustrations with Red Bull.

George Russell, a known entity since his promotion in 2022, remains a cornerstone of Mercedes’ rebuilding era. But the inclusion of Kimi Antonelli, the 17-year-old Italian prodigy currently climbing the ranks in Formula 2, signals a massive vote of confidence in youth. Mercedes clearly believes their future lies not in experienced megastars, but in fresh talent capable of adapting to the incoming 2026 technical overhaul.

Red Bull in Crisis: Max Carrying a Sinking Ship

Meanwhile, the situation at Red Bull has gone from dominant to disastrous.

In 2025, their RB21 has been nothing short of underwhelming—sitting P4 in the Constructors’ Standings. Verstappen himself has managed 165 of Red Bull’s 172 points, highlighting a jaw-dropping 96% contribution rate. His solo heroics, including a handful of podiums and pole positions, haven’t been enough to prevent a sharp decline.

Red Bull’s internal structure has unraveled as well. The team has seen key exits, including longtime stalwarts Adrian Newey and Jonathan Wheatley, while team boss Christian Horner’s leadership is under renewed scrutiny.

Their new engine project with RBPT-Ford for 2026 has raised red flags across the paddock. Experts from PlanetF1 and AutoSport have voiced serious doubts about the unit’s competitiveness, especially in a hybrid-heavy era with 50% electric power. Contrast that with Mercedes, whose power unit legacy from 2014–2020 positions them as early favorites for the next era.

Verstappen’s Dilemma: Loyalty or Legacy?

So where does this leave Max Verstappen?

While he’s currently under contract with Red Bull until 2028, multiple outlets—including Motorsport.com—report exit clauses that could be triggered if performance metrics aren’t met. Verstappen himself told ESPN, “I need a winning car.” It’s a clear signal that his patience is wearing thin.

His options are limited but tantalizing. Aston Martin, powered by Honda from 2026, is quietly assembling an aggressive project that could appeal to Max’s winning instincts. Insiders believe 2027 could be the year he makes the leap—assuming Red Bull doesn’t recover in time.

Natalie Pinkham of Sky Sports warns that if Red Bull’s engine gamble fails, Verstappen won’t hesitate to bolt. “Max is loyal, but not naive,” she noted during the Silverstone weekend. “He’s not going to waste prime years hoping for miracles.”

Why Wolff Said No: A Calculated Gamble

Why would Mercedes pass on the chance to sign a generational talent like Max Verstappen?

According to insiders, it’s about control, timing, and long-term vision. Wolff is building a team culture focused on development and continuity. Signing Max, with his reputation for demanding high influence within teams, could disrupt that dynamic.

There’s also the cost factor. Verstappen commands one of the highest salaries in the sport, and Mercedes may prefer to invest those funds into technical infrastructure and engine development. Their powertrain program for the 2026 regulations is believed to be well ahead of the curve.

And then there’s Kimi Antonelli—a junior with the raw speed, intelligence, and temperament that Mercedes sees as their Verstappen 2.0. Betting on him now could pay massive dividends, especially if he grows into a title contender under Russell’s guidance.

The Grid Reacts: Opinions Split on Max’s Next Move

Across the F1 community, reactions to Mercedes’ announcement are mixed.

Ted Kravitz described the decision as “bold but risky,” warning that if Red Bull rebounds and Max remains dominant, Mercedes may live to regret the snub. Meanwhile, X (formerly Twitter) is ablaze with polarized takes: some praise Mercedes for looking to the future, while others accuse them of letting a golden opportunity slip through their fingers.

Red Bull fans, on the other hand, are praying that new boss Laurent Mekies can stabilize the ship and deliver a competitive 2026 car. Without that, even the most loyal Verstappen might finally say goodbye.

Zooming Out: F1’s Shifting Power Balance

What we’re witnessing is nothing short of a paradigm shift in F1.

Red Bull, once unbeatable, is faltering. Mercedes is banking on youth and technical prowess. Ferrari, with Lewis Hamilton joining in 2025, is back in the spotlight. And Aston Martin is slowly transforming into a legitimate powerhouse with factory Honda backing.

Spa, Suzuka, and Silverstone may still host thrilling races, but the real action is happening off the track. Contracts, engines, and strategic gambles will shape the next decade of racing far more than any single overtake or pit stop.

Final Thoughts: A Gamble Worth Taking?

Toto Wolff’s decision to close the door on Max Verstappen is as controversial as it is strategic. By locking in George Russell and placing a huge bet on Kimi Antonelli, Mercedes is signaling confidence in their engine program and internal development pipeline.

Max Verstappen, meanwhile, is left to steer a flailing Red Bull toward an uncertain future. Whether he stays and fights or jumps ship for a better package in 2027 will define his legacy.

One thing’s certain: the 2026 season is already shaping up to be one of the most dramatic resets in Formula 1 history.

Where do you stand?
Was Wolff’s decision genius or a major misstep? Is Max better off leading a rebuild or joining a ready-made contender? Buckle up—F1’s next era is already roaring to life.

Full Video:

Red Bull axed Christian Horner after 20 years as team principal and chief executive of the F1 team last week, meaning the Belgian Grand Prix is the first event he has missed in 406 races

Christian Horner is no longer in the F1 paddock(Image: Getty Images)

Axed Formula 1 team boss Christian Horner took to social media to show fans what he was up to on the first race Sunday since he was dismissed. A tongue-in-cheek post on his Instagram story showed the 51-year-old was not just sitting around watching the F1 action.

Horner was in charge of Red Bull Racing for 20 years, having taken over before the team’s debut on the grid in 2005. And he famously never failed to travel for a single race during that period, but is not at Spa-Francorchamps for this weekend’s Belgian Grand Prix.

For the first time in 406 F1 races, Horner has had to make alternative plans. A lover of horses as well as motor racing, he decided to explore his other passion having had the leadership of the Red Bull team taken away from him without warning.

A video posted on his account shows Horner riding a horse along a country lane, and then an image of him posing atop his steed in front of a barn. He poked fun at his situation with a light-hearted caption, which read: “Different horse power this Sunday.”

Horner was replaced at Red Bull by Laurent Mekies, who stepped up from his previous role as team principal at sister squad Racing Bulls. The Frenchman got off to an ideal start on Saturday as Max Verstappen won the Sprint race in Belgium.

While he holds both the team principal and chief executive titles, Mekies will have much less power than Horner previously did at the team. Adviser Helmut Marko confirmed as much when he said: “We were able to bring Laurent Mekies into the family. His responsibilities will be significantly reduced, with the main focus being on racing.”

Mekies knows that his first big job as Red Bull Racing boss is to ensure that the team keeps hold of its star driver for as long as possible. Intense speculation has suggested Verstappen could quit for rivals Mercedes by exercising a release clause in his current contract, which expires in 2028.

It is understood that Verstappen is likely to stick with Red Bull for now, rather than leave ahead of the 2026 season. But Mekies is fully aware that the Dutchman is likely to go wherever the quickest car available is so he can add to his four F1 titles so far.

“I’m sure Max wants a fast car and if we get him a fast car, I’m sure it’s cancelling out all the other considerations,” he said in his first press conference as Red Bull boss at Spa-Francorchamps on Friday.

“So really the focus is very much to try to get to know the team as quickly as possible in order to see how we can support, how we can build the next step of competitiveness in order to get a fast car and hence to make it an easy call for Max.”