For months, the future of Formula 1’s most dominant force has been hanging in the balance, a high-stakes drama played out against a backdrop of whispers, speculation, and the looming shadow of the 2026 regulation changes. Oracle Red Bull Racing, the team that delivered four consecutive world championships to Max Verstappen, made the biggest gamble in its history: to transition from a customer team reliant on external power suppliers like Honda and Renault, to a fully independent constructor building its own power unit in partnership with Ford.

This move—a genuine attempt to achieve complete independence and a level of chassis-engine integration unseen since the days of peak Mercedes dominance—was widely regarded as reckless, bordering on suicidal. The paddock chatter was relentless: Red Bull Powertrains (RBPT) was behind schedule; the challenge was too immense for a team starting from scratch; and most critically, their star driver, the generational talent Max Verstappen, was so concerned about the project’s prospects that he was actively exploring exit clauses in his contract. The narrative was set for a spectacular fall.

But now, in a stunning twist that has dramatically reshaped the political and technical landscape of the sport, a wave of crucial new information has emerged from the secretive confines of the Milton Keynes factory, painting a picture that is not only positive but aggressively ahead of schedule. The engine is running. The star driver is impressed. And the rest of the grid can hear the sound of their rivals’ doubts being crushed on a dynamometer.

The Anatomy of a ‘Crazy’ Project

To truly grasp the magnitude of this revelation, one must first understand the challenge Red Bull undertook. Team Principal Laurent Mekies recently summarized the endeavor with remarkable candour: he called it simply, a “crazy project.”

“There is nothing as crazy as that in recent Formula 1 history,” Mekies admitted, characterizing the decision to build an F1 engine from the ground up as “typical Red Bull crazy stuff to do.”

Since their debut in 2005, Red Bull has relied on others for the beating heart of their race cars. From Cosworth to Ferrari, through the title-winning Renault era with Sebastian Vettel, and finally with Honda for the Max Verstappen dynasty, they have been masters of the chassis, but always dependent on a manufacturer’s willingness and ability to supply competitive power. That dependency was the limiting factor, the strategic vulnerability in their otherwise formidable armor.

When they decided to take the leap, they started, as RBPT Chief Operating Officer Matt Caddeo put it, with “no expertise, no infrastructure, no intellectual property.” It was, in his words, a “really brave choice.” The technical challenge, according to initial internal assessments, was even underestimated by the team itself. Caddeo recalled asking what tools were needed for the digital activity, only to find the scope was two to three times larger than their first guess. “Knowing nothing about it but knowing enough to be dangerous, we underestimated the challenge,” he confessed.

However, this inherent adaptability, honed over decades of rapid development and competition, allowed the team to scale up quickly, attracting top talent from across the industry to build a fully functional Power Trains division in record time.

The Sound That Silenced the Skeptics

The definitive, undeniable evidence that Red Bull is not just surviving but thriving in this transition comes in the form of a mechanical reality: the 2026 Red Bull Ford power unit is officially running.

Laurent Mekies confirmed the critical milestone, announcing that the engine has been on the dyno “for a while now.” He added, with a palpable sense of relief and pride, “Just hearing that sound is already crazy, let alone whether it’s going to be fast or not. So, yes, the sound is on.”

This is far more than a PR stunt; it is a critical engineering accomplishment. For a project as ambitious as this, moving from computer-aided designs (CAD) and simulations to a physical piece of hardware that is firing and running laps on a dynamometer marks the definitive transition from planning to execution. It means the team is now in the vital stage of real-world testing and refinement, a process that is miles ahead of what their rivals had hoped or predicted.

Mekies described this period as the “peak stress moment to make sure we can actually make one and get one to the racetrack.” This is the language of a team approaching the finish line of development, not one struggling to simply get off the starting grid. This confidence is further evidenced by the aggressive scheduling of their 2026 season launch, which is already set for January 15th at a Ford event in Detroit. You do not schedule a launch date that early if you fear having nothing to show.

Verstappen’s Verdict: Flabbergasted and Fully Committed

Perhaps the most potent piece of information, and the emotional core of this story, centers on the man whose signature matters most: Max Verstappen. The persistent, damaging rumors—that he was actively looking for an exit, afraid of the project’s failure—cast the longest shadow over Red Bull’s immediate future. A multi-time world champion does not want to waste his prime years waiting for an engine division to catch up.

Amidst this tense speculation, Verstappen paid a visit to the Red Bull Powertrains factory to see the progress for himself. The result, according to Red Bull Technical Director Ben Hodgkinson, was overwhelmingly positive.

“I think he was impressed with where we were,” Hodgkinson revealed. “He was able to see some running engines doing laps, so he got to hear what the ’26 power unit would sound like.”

This was the first time the four-time world champion had heard the engine that will power his future. His reaction was not one of concern, but of deep technical engagement. Hodgkinson noted that Verstappen “has a great understanding of the technical side and was asking lots of really intelligent questions as we went around.”

He wasn’t just observing; he was actively participating, keen to understand the intricate details. What truly impressed—and in fact, “flabbergasted”—the notoriously demanding driver was the sheer scale and meticulous detail of the operation. Hodgkinson shared that when he tours people through the facility, they are typically astonished. “When you share that detail, their minds blow. I can’t quite believe how many elements that we dissect,” he said.

For Verstappen, seeing this level of commitment, expertise, and operational scale firsthand was the only reassurance he needed. It confirms that the fears of a looming catastrophe were severely overblown. The visit effectively neutralized the speculation surrounding his future, suggesting that he is fully bought into the Red Bull project for 2026 and beyond.

The Competitive Edge of Perfect Harmony

Beyond the immediate reassurance of a running engine and a satisfied superstar, the strategic payoff of this ‘crazy’ gamble is enormous. As a customer team, Red Bull had to integrate its chassis with an engine designed by a third party. Now, by controlling both the chassis and the power unit, they unlock a critical competitive advantage: the ability to design the two elements to work in “perfect harmony.”

This level of integration was the bedrock of Mercedes’ dominance in the turbo-hybrid era, allowing them to optimize the entire car package—aerodynamics, cooling, weight distribution, and power delivery—in a way customer teams simply could not replicate. Red Bull is now chasing that same holistic synergy.

The digital infrastructure, developed in partnership with Oracle, is another major differentiator. Matt Caddeo highlights the creation of “tighter, faster loops between modeling, simulation, design, and operations.” Since every part of this process is now owned in-house, they can iterate and improve at a pace that was impossible when relying on external suppliers. This control will pay massive dividends in the complex, constantly evolving environment of F1 regulations.

Furthermore, both Verstappen and Mekies have proactively pushed back on the convenient narrative that 2026 represents a “complete reset” where all their current advantages will disappear. While the rules are new, Mekies asserts that the fundamental team strength remains. “You will use the same people. You will use the same methodology, the same process, the same tools to go and design that car,” he explained. The deep knowledge they hold about aerodynamics, car development, and tire behavior from the current dominant era will not simply vanish.

The road to 2026 is undeniably long and filled with challenges, and Red Bull has acknowledged the immense difficulty of their chosen path. However, the unexpected news streaming from Milton Keynes signifies a profound shift in momentum. The project once dismissed by rivals and shadowed by doubt is not just on track; it might very well be ahead. Red Bull’s ‘crazy’ gamble is now looking like a masterstroke, poised to grant them a strategic advantage they have never possessed before, ensuring the sound of their engine remains the sound of supremacy for years to come.

More MPs Will Fall to Nigel Farage Than Ever Before: Zia Yusuf’s Explosive Warning to Britain’s P0lit!cal Establishment

In an electrifying interview from Westminster, Reform UK’s Head of Policy Zia Yusuf issued what could be one of the most consequential warnings of Britain’s modern P0lit!cal era — that “more MPs will lose their seats to Nigel Farage’s Reform movement than at any point in history.” Yusuf’s remarks, delivered with striking conviction, signal a growing insurgency against what he describes as “a decaying P0lit!cal class that has betrayed the people.” With the general election fast approaching, Reform UK’s message of rebellion against the establishment is cutting deeper than ever — and the tremors are being felt across every corner of Westminster.

 The Rise of Reform: Britain’s P0lit!cal Earthquake

For years, the British P0lit!cal scene has been dominated by the two-party establishment — Labour and the Conservatives — who traded power while millions of voters felt abandoned. But 2025 marks a turning point. Under the unmistakable leadership of Nigel Farage, Reform UK has surged from the margins to the mainstream, shaking the foundations of British politics.

According to Yusuf, this surge isn’t a temporary protest — it’s a “revolt born out of betrayal.” He accuses successive governments of hollow promises and moral cowardice. “People have been lied to,” he says. “They were promised Brexit would take back control, that immigration would be reduced, and that living standards would rise. None of that has happened.”

Polling backs up Yusuf’s claim. Reform UK has not only overtaken the Conservatives in several national surveys but has also made stunning local gains — winning councils outright and splitting once-safe seats into unpredictable battlegrounds. “This isn’t a protest vote,” Yusuf insists. “It’s a P0lit!cal realignment.”

 Immigration, Welfare, and the Great Divide

At the heart of Yusuf’s message lies a searing critique of Britain’s immigration system — both legal and illegal. “Legal immigration has been far too high, and illegal immigrants should be deported. That’s not radical — it’s common sense,” he declares. His words echo the frustration of millions who believe the government has lost control of the borders.

But Yusuf goes further, drawing a line between immigration and what he calls the “collapse of fairness” in the welfare system. “We have a system where British taxpayers — the people who built this nation — are being pushed aside, while newcomers are given priority for housing, healthcare, and benefits. That’s not compassion. That’s betrayal.”

He argues that reforming welfare is just as vital as reforming immigration. “We need a welfare system that rewards work, not idleness,” he says, calling for tougher eligibility checks, stricter enforcement of benefit fraud, and investment in apprenticeships and vocational training. “Britain doesn’t need more cheap labour. It needs skilled, proud, working citizens.”

 The Betrayal of the P0lit!cal Class

Yusuf’s rhetoric cuts across traditional P0lit!cal boundaries. “The Conservatives have sold out their voters. Labour has sold out its principles. Both have sold out Britain,” he declares. This sense of betrayal has become a defining theme of Reform UK’s message.

According to Yusuf, Westminster has become an echo chamber — insulated, elitist, and fundamentally disconnected from the real struggles of ordinary people. “When MPs spend more time lobbying for foreign interests, corporate donors, and think tanks than they do listening to the people who elected them, democracy breaks down,” he says.

He accuses both major parties of ignoring Britain’s industrial heartlands and prioritizing “London elites” and “metropolitan ideology” over national unity. “The gap between Parliament and the people has never been wider. That’s why Farage’s message resonates — because he speaks the language of the forgotten majority.”

 A New P0lit!cal Era — or Controlled Chaos?

As Reform UK’s support rises, Yusuf insists the movement is more than a protest — it’s a blueprint for power. Behind the scenes, Farage’s team is building what Yusuf calls a “shadow cabinet for a new Britain.” This team, composed of former business leaders, economists, and disillusioned politicians, aims to rewrite the national agenda from top to bottom.

Their priorities are clear: secure borders, lower taxes, energy independence, and national sovereignty. “Britain must stop apologizing for its success,” Yusuf says. “We must stop outsourcing our energy, our defence, and our future.”

But critics argue that Reform’s populism risks creating instability. Economists warn that a sudden crackdown on immigration could disrupt the labour market, while diplomats fear that Farage’s Eurosceptic foreign policy might alienate allies. Yusuf, however, remains unfazed. “Real change is never tidy,” he says. “Reform isn’t about managing decline — it’s about rebuilding Britain.”

The Coming Reckoning: Britain’s P0lit!cal Reset

As the general election looms, Yusuf predicts a historic collapse of the status quo. “There will be blood on the ballot paper,” he says bluntly. “MPs who thought they were untouchable will wake up without a seat. Voters are done with excuses — they want accountability.”

He points to the growing disillusionment across all demographics — from disaffected working-class communities in the North to overtaxed professionals in the South — and claims Reform UK is the only party truly listening. “We don’t speak to focus groups. We speak to the people.”

In his view, Nigel Farage’s potential rise to Downing Street is no longer unthinkable. “Farage could become the most consequential Prime Minister in modern British history — not because he’s a politician, but because he’s not one.”

As Yusuf concludes, the warning is clear — and chilling for Britain’s old guard: “The establishment has mocked the people for too long. This time, the people will answer back — and it won’t be polite.”

It was the kind of television moment that leaves a studio frozen.
A Question Time audience, usually vocal but polite, gasped audibly as BBC presenter Fiona Bruce was shut down live on air in a furious exchange over a blunder linked to Prime Minister 𝘒𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳.

The chaos unfolded during Thursday night’s broadcast, when what began as a standard political debate suddenly spiraled into a no-holds-barred confrontation about leadership, trust, and the crumbling state of Britain under Labour.

“You can’t keep defending this, Fiona!” – a voice roared from the audience

A man in the back row stood up, shaking with anger as he confronted the panel.

“You can’t keep defending this, Fiona! You’re sitting there protecting a man who’s tearing this country apart,” he shouted, as gasps echoed through the hall.

Bruce tried to regain control, urging calm and reminding the audience of BBC’s neutrality, but the tension was already spiraling.
When she attempted to steer the discussion back to fiscal policy, another audience member cut in:

“Fiscal policy? We’re talking about families who can’t heat their homes because of Starmer’s failures! Stop pretending it’s just numbers.”

The studio lights glared. The tension was electric.

The blunder that lit the fuse

The trigger was Starmer’s recent tax and spending blunder, which critics say exposed deep cracks in his leadership and his government’s credibility.
During a press conference earlier in the week, Starmer had dismissed growing concerns over the government’s borrowing figures as “temporary turbulence.” Hours later, the Office for Budget Responsibility revealed that Britain’s borrowing had hit a five-year high, with billions unaccounted for.

That revelation ignited a firestorm — and Question Time became the battleground.

Fiona Bruce caught in the crossfire

As audience fury built, Fiona Bruce attempted to mediate, insisting the BBC had to remain balanced.
But her insistence only fueled the outrage.

“Balanced?” one audience member sneered. “When did the BBC last challenge Starmer properly? You’d have torn Nigel Farage to pieces for half of what he’s done!”

At that, the crowd erupted — some cheering, others booing.
Bruce’s microphone briefly cut out as producers scrambled to regain order. Cameras zoomed in on her uneasy smile — the kind that hides panic beneath professionalism.

For nearly a full minute, the show descended into total chaos.
The Question Time brand — a symbol of British democracy and debate — had turned into a battlefield of frustration.

A nation losing patience

This wasn’t just about one blunder or one BBC presenter. It was about a country losing patience.

In pubs, on buses, and across social media, Britons are asking the same question: “Where is this country going?”
From soaring taxes to public services collapsing under pressure, and a Prime Minister increasingly accused of arrogance, many feel abandoned and deceived.

“He talks about unity,” one woman told reporters outside the studio. “But everything feels divided — London against the rest, the rich against the poor, the elites against ordinary people. I don’t recognise this country anymore.”

Farage fires back

Hours after the broadcast, Nigel Farage weighed in on the chaos, calling it “proof that the British public has had enough of being lied to.”

In a fiery post on X (formerly Twitter), Farage wrote:

“BBC’s meltdown tonight shows the tide is turning. People are no longer afraid to say what they think — and they’re tired of Starmer’s hollow promises. Britain deserves better.”

The post went viral within minutes, amassing hundreds of thousands of reactions. Supporters of the Reform Party hailed it as a “turning point” — the moment the public finally began to push back against the political establishment.

For months, critics have accused 𝘒𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘮𝘦𝘳 of wearing a mask of calm competence while presiding over chaos behind the scenes.
From record borrowing levels to controversial immigration policies, his administration is increasingly viewed as out of touch with ordinary Britons.

“It’s all spin and slogans,” said one former Labour voter during the Question Time aftermath. “He promised change, but all we’ve got is higher taxes, weaker borders, and a government that blames everyone else.”

Political analysts argue that the outburst on BBC wasn’t random — it was the symptom of deeper anger simmering nationwide.

When the audience turns, the nation follows

The BBC has long been seen as the nation’s mirror. When that mirror cracks — when its host is shouted down on live television — it sends a message that the balance of public opinion has shifted.

What happened on Question Time wasn’t just a shouting match. It was a sign that the British public, weary of rising costs and broken promises, is no longer willing to look the other way.

“This isn’t about politics anymore,” said one audience member as the cameras stopped rolling. “It’s about truth. And the truth is, people are angry — and they have every right to be.”

A warning to Westminster

The viral clip has since been shared millions of times across social media.
Even among Labour supporters, there’s growing concern that the government’s arrogance and detachment could soon backfire spectacularly.

As one political commentator put it bluntly:

“When the BBC loses control of the room, you know the country is slipping beyond the establishment’s grasp.”

Adil Ray has been hit with backlash with calls for him to ‘be sacked’ (Image: ITV)

A GB News star has shared their outrage and demanded that ITV star Adil Ray should be “sacked” after reports of the Good Morning Britain presenter “appearing to back Sharia Law”. Daily Express columnist Carole Malone took to her social media account to share her thoughts on the alleged situation as she made a strong demand.

Posting to X/Twitter, the TV host reshared a post which read: “NEW: GMB host Adil Ray was hauled in by bosses yesterday to face crisis talks after posting in support of Sharia Law”. She then added her own thoughts as she wrote: “Never mind crisis talks – he should be sacked. Sharia Law is an abomination that discriminates against and harms women.” It follows reports that Good Morning Britain executives were cross and bosses were “sent into a tailspin” after seeing comments from him shared on social media, so they called him in. Just days before, Adil had posted his support for New York’s newly elected mayor, Zohran Mamdani. In the post where he shared his support, he appeared to back Sharia law for the city.

The presenter had shared on X on November 5: “Some say Mamdani may implement Sharia Law. He might. The heart of Sharia law is social justice, welfare, fairness, charity and cohesion.

“Most Muslim countries operate a hybrid of Sharia and civil law, and are slowly reforming and abandoning unethical practices despite the West’s portrayal.”

In a follow-up post shared on November 7, Adil explained: “To clarify, I am not actually suggesting Mamdani would implement Sharia law.

“But many of the issues he campaigned for are also some of the positive values of Sharia that Muslims try to live by. Something many of us would agree on.”

The comments come as ITV are reportedly in high profile talks with Sky – meaning that it couldn’t be worse timing for the broadcasters.

Adil Ray has reportedly been hauled in by ITV bosses (Image: ITV)

IMPORTANT NOTICE: We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. More info.

The channel are said to be in talks to sell its broadcasting arm to Sky in a £1.6billion deal and “don’t want anything to derail that”.

Adil joined ITV in 2018 as one of the temporary replacements for Piers Morgan on GMB and has become a regular fixture of the show.

Before that, the presenter began his career on the BBC’s Asian Network and has been a regular across the BBC, including on Radio 5 Live and Radio 4, as well as hosting shows on BBC TV.

He also created the BBC’s first Muslim sitcom Citizen Khan which ran for five primetime series on BBC1 until 2016.

Just 30 minutes ago in Buckingham, the figure skating community was shaken by heartbreaking news. Karen Barber – an athlete, TV host, and former celebrated champion – broke down in tears as she shared an urgent message with fans: her husband, ice dance legend Christopher Dean, is battling early-onset Parkinson’s disease.

This news quickly sent shockwaves and grief through the global audience, especially for those who grew up watching Dean’s artistic performances alongside his partner Jayne Torvill – a duo that has become a symbol of ice dancing itself.

An Emotional Announcement
Speaking live from their home in Buckingham during a short livestream, Karen Barber’s voice trembled as she held a sheet of paper with her statement. Every word carried worry and love for her husband, moving viewers to tears. Barber said through sobs: “Christopher wanted us to share this together, but the truth is… time is of the essence now. He has been diagnosed with early-onset Parkinson’s. We are facing it head-on, but we can’t do it without your love and support.”

Even close friends were caught off guard by the news. While Dean, 66, had occasionally mentioned minor health issues in interviews, there had been no indication of the seriousness of his condition.

A Private Battle Now Made Public
According to Barber, the diagnosis came a few months ago after Dean began experiencing tremors in his right hand and occasional difficulty with balance — symptoms especially hard for a man renowned for precision and control in movement.

“Chris tried to keep skating for as long as he could,” Barber said emotionally. “But there were days when he’d step on the ice and his body just… wouldn’t respond.”

Specialists confirmed the diagnosis after a series of tests. Although Parkinson’s is progressive and incurable, early detection and treatment can help mitigate its effects.

The Skating World Reacts
Within minutes of Barber’s announcement, tributes poured in from across the skating world. Jayne Torvill, Dean’s partner of over four decades, shared a brief but heartfelt message:

“Chris has always been the strongest person I know — not just in body, but in spirit. We’ve faced challenges before, and we will face this one together. My heart is with Chris and Karen every step of the way.”

Former students, fellow Olympians, and fans from Canada, Japan, and Australia recalled Dean’s iconic performances — from the legendary Boléro at the 1984 Winter Olympics to his many years mentoring young skaters.

A Career Defined by Artistry
Christopher Dean’s influence on ice dancing is undeniable. Alongside Jayne Torvill, he transformed the discipline into a perfect blend of sport and art, inspiring generations with innovative choreography and emotional storytelling.

Even after retiring from competition, Dean remained a central figure in the skating community — coaching, choreographing, and serving as a judge and mentor on Dancing on Ice. His passion for the sport never faded, making today’s news especially painful for those who viewed him as an untouchable icon of vitality and grace.

Fans Share Their Heartbreak
On social media, the hashtag #PrayersForChris quickly began trending within the hour. One fan wrote: “Christopher Dean taught us that skating can touch your soul. Now it’s our turn to lift him up.”

Another shared a video of Dean and Torvill’s final Olympic performance, captioning it: “This is how I will always remember him — strong, graceful, unforgettable.”

For many, the news feels deeply personal, as Dean’s performances were tied to their own life milestones — a wedding dance, a family TV tradition, or a first trip to see live skating.

Doctors have recommended a combination of medication, physical therapy, and regular physical activity to help manage symptoms. Barber said Dean has already started specialized training to maintain mobility and strength.

A Call for Compassion
In closing, Barber made a heartfelt appeal to fans and the media:

“Please don’t see this as the end of his story. See it as a new chapter. Support him, celebrate him, and remember all that he’s given to the world of skating.”

She also urged people to support Parkinson’s research, stressing that awareness and funding are crucial to developing better treatments.

A Legacy That Will Not Fade
While Parkinson’s will inevitably change the way Christopher Dean moves, it can never erase the profound mark he has left on the sport and in the hearts of millions. His career stands as a testament to artistry, partnership, and the relentless pursuit of excellence.

Now, as he faces the greatest personal challenge of his life, the skating community — from Olympic champions to young skaters lacing up their first pair of boots — is rallying around him.

Because Christopher Dean has spent his life bringing beauty to the ice. And now, the world is ready to give back: with love, gratitude, and the unwavering belief that his story is far from over.

Joanna Lumley has never been one to stay silent — but her latest comments have ignited one of the most explosive national debates of the year. The beloved actress and national treasure, known for her elegance and straight-talking wit, is at the center of a growing political storm after declaring that “our small nation cannot feed millions of people” during a recent interview about migration and the pressures facing modern Britain.

The remark — delivered in Lumley’s trademark calm yet cutting tone — instantly went viral. Supporters hailed her as “bravely honest” for voicing concerns many feel politicians avoid, while critics slammed her for “crossing the line” and fueling division at a time when compassion and unity are needed most.

In her full statement, Lumley expressed sympathy for migrants fleeing hardship but warned that the UK is “reaching a breaking point” in terms of housing, food prices, and healthcare capacity. “I believe in kindness and refuge,” she said, “but there must also be realism. We are a small island — we cannot take in everyone who wishes to come. That’s not cruelty; it’s common sense.”

Her words — though measured — struck a raw nerve. Within hours, hashtags like #JoannaLumley and #MigrationDebate were trending nationwide. Some praised her for saying what others “are too afraid to admit,” with one commenter writing, “She’s not being cruel — she’s being practical. We’re all feeling the strain.” Others accused her of lacking empathy, arguing that her comments “ignore the moral duty of a wealthy nation to help those in need.”

Political figures quickly weighed in. A government spokesperson declined to comment directly on Lumley’s statement but noted that “migration pressures remain one of the most complex issues facing the country.” Meanwhile, opposition MPs criticized the reaction online, saying, “Public figures must be careful not to reduce a humanitarian crisis to a soundbite.”

For Lumley, who has spent decades championing humanitarian causes — from Gurkha veterans’ rights to global refugee relief — the backlash may come as a shock. Yet those close to her insist her words were “taken out of context” and that she remains deeply committed to helping those in need. “Joanna’s compassion has never been in doubt,” said one longtime friend. “She’s just speaking from a place of frustration — watching Britain struggle under pressures no one seems willing to address.”

The debate shows no sign of cooling. Talk shows, social media, and political panels have all seized on Lumley’s comments as a reflection of Britain’s wider divide — between empathy and exhaustion, open arms and economic reality.

Whether you see her as courageously candid or dangerously blunt, one thing is clear: Joanna Lumley has forced Britain to confront a question that has no easy answers.

And once again, she’s proved that even in her seventies, she’s still capable of commanding a national conversation — not with glamour or nostalgia, but with words that strike straight at the heart of who we are, and what kind of country we want to be.

The Golden Bachelor gave us quite the finale on Wednesday night as Mel and Peg chose each other, and Cindy self-eliminated prior to the Fantasy Suites. There was no proposal—there wasn’t even a declaration of “I love you”—but in some ways, this may have been the most normal ending we’ve seen on the show.

After five weeks of both one-on-one and group dates, Mel wasn’t ready to propose to anyone. Many called into question why he would even go on the show in the first place (never mind the podcast comments) if he wasn’t ready for marriage, but I give him credit for not leading anyone on or being someone he’s not. When Cindy decided to go home prior to the Fantasy Suites because Mel couldn’t give her the commitment she wanted, he didn’t go after her. He certainly didn’t try to convince her to stay, either.

And when Mel told Peg that Cindy was gone, he also didn’t make false promises to her, either, just because she was the last one standing. Instead he wanted to introduce Peg to his sons and best friend, Diane, because in a normal relationship that’s just what you do. Sure, it felt a little funny when he said goodbye to Peg at the end of the day and said, “Tomorrow we’ll celebrate.” But then again, that’s only because we as Bachelor Nation have become accustomed to larger-than-life, unrealistic endings. (One look at Gerry Turner and Theresa Nist—who have been majorly at odds following his book release—should tell you all you need to know.)

As Peg said, “I’m not for everybody, and he’s not for everybody, but we»re for each other.” Mel also gave Peg a Neil Lane ring as a sign of his commitment. And when Peg and Mel signed onto Zoom for their interview with Glamour less than 24 hours after the live finale, Mel said to me, “I told you I was going to get someone good.”

So what’s next for the Golden Bachelor couple? When did they even realize they were in love? And who do they think would be the best choice to follow in Joan Vassos’s footsteps as the next Golden Bachelorette? Below, they answer all that and more.

Glamour: Congratulations to you both! Mel, you weren’t kidding about the fireworks, literally and figuratively. You’re in love, too, but we didn’t hear those words until the “After the Final Rose” live taping. So when did you guys know you were in love, and when did you first say those words to each other?

Peg Munson: Well, I knew I was growing in love with him during this whole journey. So it was one day at a time, and it was just opening up my heart and my mind to allow that to happen naturally. It wasn’t just one day, like, “Boom! I’m in love with you.” It’s time. It takes time to get to know somebody, and it takes time to fall in love with somebody. It was a progression for me.

Mel, what about you? When did you first say “I love you” to Peg?

Mel Owens: When I first met Peg, I had a crush on her. It was almost that instantaneous electricity and a connection, and then it grew over time. By time we were on the island in Antigua, and then we went to the little island, I realized, I’m in love with her. I just became infatuated with her, and I had a crush on her, and it’s still growing.

I have to say, while we love a grand gesture or a proposal, I think you guys probably did it the smartest way. You’re in an accelerated timeline, and you’ve only known each other for about five weeks, so don’t rush the feelings. You might’ve done it the smartest way of any couple on this show. Do you feel that?

Peg: We appreciate that. We really appreciate that.

Mel: It’s because I’m a Michigan guy!

Peg: He’s a smart guy. He’s a smart guy.

Speaking of smart people, Peg met Diane during the family visit with your sons. Is this the same Diane that you mentioned in our first sit-down interview, the one who kind of schooled you on the aftermath of the podcast?

Mel: Yes, she’s the most reasonable person I’ve ever met. She’s just so reasonable. She’s deputy commissioner of the Big 10. She’s the attorney, spokesperson, and media person. She put together billion-dollar deals for TV. And she’s a reality TV junkie, too, which I didn’t even know until she was setting me straight. But she gave me good counsel. She really did.

Before we get into what’s next for you and Peg, I want to go back to that night on the dock with Cindy when she decided to go home. I personally think that at that moment, you knew then that Peg was your person. Otherwise you would have tried to convince Cindy to stay. Am I wrong in assuming that?

Mel: I had a deeper connection with Peg. I just did. Had it been reversed and [Peg left], I wouldn’t have let her go. I would’ve told her, “Hey, look, stay here because we’re going to work it out.” Cindy didn’t even utilize the Fantasy Suite, which she could have, but that’s okay. She had her own decision to make, her own prerogative. My connection with Peg was much stronger, and your intuition was correct.

I love that. “I wouldn’t let you go.” Look at you, Mr. Romantic!

Mel: Peg’s the best gal ever.

You bring out such a spark in one another. There’s a playfulness and youthfulness there. So let’s talk about Thanksgiving plans. Where will you be, and how do you plan on making this work in terms of going back and forth between Las Vegas and Orange County?

Peg: Well, the nice thing about being in our golden years is we get to do things [according to our timeline]. Thanksgiving, we’re going to be in Detroit. We’re going to be in Ann Arbor, and then Christmas we’re going to be in Rio. We’re going back to Vegas for his birthday. Then we’re going to the Super Bowl in San Francisco. We have a lot on our plate. It’s time to live life and enjoy life.

Mel: She left out one thing. When we go to Ann Arbor, Michigan, we’re going to go to something called Hob Nobble Gobble. It’s a big gala, bigger than the Emmys, and that’s in Michigan. Before that we’re going to Toronto and Montreal; we’re going to be in Detroit for Hob Nobble Gobble, and then also the Michigan and Ohio State game. And then back for my birthday to Vegas. She’s taking me to The Sphere to see one of my favorite movies of all time, The Wizard of Oz.

Peg: It’s go time for us.

I want to ask one more thing about Cindy: Peg, did you get a chance to talk to her last night, or did they keep you separate?

Peg: No, I haven’t seen her. After the finale last night, we went to dinner with a few of our other friends. I just wanted something very low-key, something peaceful, so the girls—the ones that I connected with—we just went and had a good dinner. I love Cindy. She’s beautiful, she’s smart, she’s vivacious, she’s very well-spoken, and she’s got a prerogative to live her life and find the love that works for her. It doesn’t make her right. It doesn’t make her wrong. Hats off to her because she knew what she wanted. She’ll find it. She really will. She will find that person that wants to be married quickly. There’s nothing wrong with that. I love her dearly, and I hope that she definitely finds that for herself.

So who’s your pick, then, for the next Golden Bachelorette?

Peg: Debbie!

Mel: My opinion, it would be Debbie. With my experience with her, she was the most authentic, sincere, honest person. I think she can carry the show too because of her background doing the workout videos and stuff. I think she’d be a great person.

Peg: 100% Debbie. She embraces everything—the good, the bad, and the ugly of herself, which we all have. I love that about her. She doesn’t try to hide parts of herself. “This is who I am. You love me or not, but this is who I am.” That just makes her such a special human being. I’m really rooting for Debbie.

Lastly, how active do you both plan to be on your social media now? Will we see life going forward with Mel and Peg?

Peg: We’ve already posted. We posted last night. Go on there. It’s a lot of fun.

Mel: There’s a lot of fun to come, too!

Peg: We plan to share that with everybody.

Mel: The Hob Nobble Gobble parade is about a week before Thanksgiving, and the same people who put on the Hob Nobble Gobble do the Detroit Parade, which is the second-largest one outside of New York. So we’re going to do the parade as well. It’s going to be crazy.

You better be on a float.

Peg: Oh, that would be fun. That’s really fun.

Mel: I want to go on the float, but they said, “We can’t have people taking away from the float. We want the float to be a float.” But we could walk with it, though.

Peg: I want my own firetruck float.

Just think how much more publicity the float or the fire truck would get with the two of you on it. They’ve got to get their float priorities in order.

Mel: My friend runs it, so I think we’ll be all right.

This Morning host Rylan Clark issues statement after small boats backlash: ‘Stop putting everyone in a box’

‘Fair play to Rylan speaking his mind! Hope it doesn’t cost him his job’

Rylan Clark has responded to backlash after he hit out at the government’s handling of the small boats crisis on This Morning today (August 27).

Presenters Rylan Clark and Josie Gibson opened the show with the Morning View segment, welcoming Camilla Tominey and Tim Campbell to the show. “We need to talk about Nigel Farage,” Rylan said, before explaining how Farage would tackle the small boats crisis.

Later on Loose Women, Nadia Sawalha also came under fire for her views on the subject. Now, Rylan has spoken out in a grid post on his Instagram.

Rylan Clark shared his feelings over the small boats crisis on This Morning today (Credit: ITV)

This Morning host Rylan Clark airs controversial views

Speaking on the ITV daytime show, Rylan said: “So he’s [Farage] come forward and he’s unveiled his party’s plans, Reform, to tackle the small boats crisis. He’s pledging to deport 600,000 illegal migrants in the first term, if Reform get into government. This is so topical at the minute. Is this achievable?” he asked.

Camilla, said that Farage becoming PM is “looking increasingly likely if you’re judging it by the polls”. She also claimed: “Arrivals across the Channel by dingy were up to 51,000 last weekend. The top line is, if you come here illegally, you cannot stay. If you want to come here, apply legitimately for asylum.”

“Yes!” Rylan declared.

Camilla then added: “You cannot arrive here on the back of a lorry or in a dingy or you’ll be sent immediately home. And in the meantime you’re not going to be put in a migrant hotel, you’re going to be put in a detention centre. There are apparently one million people in this country who don’t have a legitimate right to be here.”

Some viewers berated the hosts for behaving like they were on GB News (Credit: ITV)

‘Welcome – come on in!’

Rylan then shared his feelings.

“And that’s a major worry. Taking politics out of it – this country is built on immigration. Legal immigration. A lot of the doctors and nurses who saved my mum’s life have come over here from other countries. They’re in our tax system, they’re helping our country thrive.

“I find it absolutely insane that all these people are, one, risking their lives to come across the Channel. And, two, when they get here, it does seem like: ‘Welcome. Come on in.’ This is the narrative we are being fed.

“‘Here’s the hotel, here’s the phones, here’s the iPads, here’s the NHS in the reception of your hotel, here’s three meals a day, here’s a games room in the hotel. Have a lovely time, welcome.’

“And then there’s people who have lived here all their lives. They are struggling. They are homeless. Let’s not even discuss our homeless. There are people living on the streets. Now this isn’t me getting on my soapbox. Let’s be honest, everyone is going to have an opinion, you’re going to upset someone. But I believe that something major needs to be done about this,” he said.

‘The money that it’s costing us!’

Rylan then continued: “The money that it’s costing us. The amount of people who are in this country who we have no idea of who they are, what they’ve done, what they’re capable of. We’ve seen a lot of it in the press at the moment, what some, not all, are doing to people in this country.

“If I turn up at Heathrow Airport as a British citizen and I’ve left my passport in Spain, I’ve got to stand at that airport and won’t be let in. But if I arrive on a boat in Calais I get taken to a four-star hotel.”

Tim and Camilla joined Josie and Rylan for the debate on This Morning (Credit: ITV)

Rylan Clark declares there are ‘two sides’ to the story

Later in the debate, he added that there are “two sides” to the story. Rylan commented: “This country has got such a brilliant history of legal immigration, welcoming people into this county, rehabilitating them into a life they deserve. That is incredible.

“But what I don’t understand is the influx of people coming into the country. It’s basically like the government is holding up a postcard across the world going: ‘Come on in, we’ll pay for everything. The borders are open. Don’t worry about the problems we’ve got going on in our own country, but come on over.’”

He concluded: “I just don’t understand. People that are genuinely fleeing war-torn countries and persecution, it’s awful. But you’re coming through eight safe countries to get to ours and I don’t understand why they’re in France, why are they not seeing asylum there?”

Rylan voiced strong views about the small boats crisis (Credit: YouTube)

Viewers react to Rylan Clark’s views

There were also two sides to the comments posted on the This Morning hashtag on Twitter.

“Got so much respect for Rylan now,” said one. “Good on you Rylan! Speaking the absolute truth!” declared another. “Rylan!! Go on, son! Finally, someone with a lick of sense on ITV. He’s representing the silent majority,” said a third.

‘Hope it doesn’t cost him his ITV job’

Others felt worried the outburst might “cost him his job”.

“Fair play to Rylan speaking his mind! Hope it doesn’t cost him his job,” said one. “Yup he’s deffo getting fired,” said another. “Steady Rylan you’ll be getting cancelled for talking sense,” another added. “Rylan will be quietly dumped for saying that,” another added. “Rylan will get fired for speaking facts,” another commented.

Others offered a third point of view, blasting Rylan and admitting they thought they’d switched on GB News instead of This Morning.

“Crikey. I thought I’d accidentally turned on GB News,” said one. “Good for Rylan, BUT @ITV you are not @GBNEWS – doing politics is not your thing,” another commented.

“This is appalling. Now RYLAN is uncritically spouting Farage’s lines and lies about refugees getting phones, iPads, games rooms and having a lovely time,” another added. “Have to say I’m disappointed in Rylan,” another commented.

Rylan claps back

After reading the response to his comments once he came off air, Rylan spoke out again. He shared a statement to social media.

It read: “You can be pro immigration and against illegal routes. You can support trans rights and have the utmost respect for women.” Rylan then said: “You can be hetrosexual and still support gay rights. The list continues.”

He then urged: “Stop with this putting everyone in a box exercise and maybe have conversations instead of shouting on Twitter.”

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by RYLAN (@rylan)

Loose Women stars Denise Welch and Janet Street Porter clash in tense English flag debate

Janet Street Porter believes the English flag must be reclaimed from Far Right

Loose Women viewers were divided today as Denise Welch and Janet Street Porter clashed over the topic of flags.

Tuesday’s (August 19) programme saw the panel discuss Birmingham City Council and Tower Hamlets Council in London removing unauthorised St George’s flags raised in recent days by activists.

Host Christine Lampard asked the guests to ponder whether the flag of England, rather than the Union Jack, was a “symbol of pride” for them. And while Denise and Janet got worked up over what the flag represents to them, social media users vented with their opinions, with Denise dismissed and abused online.

Janet Street Porter: ‘That’s absolutely mad’ (Credit: YouTube)

What did Denise Welch say on Loose Women today?

Denise was first to respond, and said: “I think it I think it’s a shame because I think it should be [a symbol of pride]. We should all be proud of our national flag. However, we can’t deny that the St George’s flag has been hijacked by the Far Right.”

She went on to mention how she’d seen someone on TV say if they saw the flag outside a pub, they probably wouldn’t go in due to “the type of people they might find in there”.

Denise Welch was unconvinced by Janet’s words (Credit: YouTube)

‘Taking the flag back from the Far Right’

At this point, Janet interjected to fume: “That’s absolutely mad.” A few moments later, Janet added: “Bonkers.”

Janet then proceeded to declare: “I would say to anyone watching: ‘Fly whatever flag you want.’ Just flap it around.”

She reasoned: “The only way we’re going to claim back the English flag from, as you say, the Far Right, is for ordinary, normal people who love England, who aren’t, you know, fascists or whatever, to claim that and own their flag.”

Janet also added: “When I lived in central London, I had a chance to have a flag pole on my house. So believe me, I had the JSP flag made and I ran it up the flagpole.” She also joked her flag had been a ‘skull and crossbones’ flag.

Denise Welch and Janet Street Porter debated vigorously (Credit: YouTube)

How Loose Women viewers reacted

Flag enthusiasts savaged Denise for her takes. “Oh shut up Denise. You never say anything of any significance or importance #LooseWomen,” one viewer countered on X.

“Absolute idiot Denise #LooseWomen,” someone else slammed her.

Another X user claimed: “Denise talks absolute [blank]. She’s making the issue with the flag worse #LooseWomen.”

While another show fan added St George and Union Jack emojis to their words as they posted: “Yes Janet #LooseWomen.”

Meanwhile, one viewer seethed: “The Union Jack and St George’s flag should be flown proudly. If anyone doesn’t like it as they feel offended then it’s them that can [blank] off! #LooseWomen.”

But someone else argued: “If you want to fly a flag from your own property, that’s fine. If you want to fly it from a lamppost, that’s not fine. It’s not what lampposts are for #LooseWomen.”

Another person put it: “You can put as many flags up on your private property as you like. But not on public property unless approved and outside No 10 or a council building etc #LooseWomen.”

The thing is those flags aren’t being put up to celebrate the country.

And yet another said: “The thing is those flags aren’t being put up to celebrate the country. They’re being weaponised by the Far Right and these are being put up to make a point #LooseWomen.”

However, one Janet Street Porter fan contributed: “Flying St George’s flag isn’t racist #LooseWomen.”

At 83, legendary British rock star Cliff Richard is finally breaking his silence on a lifetime of hidden truths, revealing the love that got away and the scandal that nearly derailed his illustrious career. As the first British rock star, Richard was adored by millions, yet behind the public persona lay a man grappling with profound personal grief and turmoil.

Cliff Richard’s rise to fame was meteoric. With chart-topping hits and a dedicated fanbase, he became a symbol of rock and roll in Britain. However, the pressure of constant scrutiny took its toll. Beneath the surface of his glamorous life, Richard faced silent battles, including unspoken love and betrayal that left deep emotional scars.

The Media Spectacle

His career faced significant challenges from a media frenzy that threatened to overshadow his achievements. The scandal that erupted not only tested his resilience but also shattered his sense of peace. Richard found himself at the center of a storm, dealing with accusations and public speculation that made it difficult to navigate his personal life and career.

A Heart Burdened by Love and Loss

Now, as he reflects on his life, Richard opens up about the love he lost and the impact it has had on him. This revelation is not just about a romantic relationship; it’s a testament to the personal sacrifices he made in pursuit of his career. The unspoken love that lingered in his heart serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities that often accompany fame.

Richard’s candid revelations are poised to change the way fans and the public perceive him. By sharing his truth, he invites listeners to see beyond the celebrity facade and understand the man behind the music. His story is one of resilience, vulnerability, and the enduring power of love, resonating with anyone who has experienced heartbreak or personal struggle.

Cliff Richard’s decision to speak out after decades of silence is a powerful moment in his life. It offers a glimpse into the challenges he faced and the emotional toll of fame. As he opens up about his past, fans are reminded that even the most celebrated figures carry their own burdens. This honesty will undoubtedly deepen the connection between Richard and his audience, allowing them to appreciate not just the artist but the person he is today.