Author: bang5

As Katie Price faces backlash for partying with celebs in Ibiza, a source says that her antics will be tough on her boyfriend JJ Slater – and fans urge him to ‘dump her’

Katie and JJ have been together since 2024(Image: PA)

Katie Price’s outrageous bikini-clad antics in Ibiza have sparked calls for her reality star boyfriend John ‘JJ’ Slater to dump her. The 47-year-old let her hair down last week on a wild trip to the party island, where she was snapped cosying up to a number of shirtless men – including some very famous faces.

And her behaviour didn’t go down well back home, with Katie accused of being “disrespectful” towards Married At First Sight UK hunk JJ, 32, who she started dating early last year. However, despite the flood of negative comments, a source tells OK! the warnings will fall on deaf ears and that “Katie is just being Katie”.

Katie let her hair down on the party island(Image: rymi1/Instagram)

“She can’t help but flirt and cosy up to people – it’s the life she’s always led,” said our source. “She thinks it’s all just a bit of innocent flirting because she’s a very loud and larger than life character, but for her boyfriends it’s another thing.

“Seeing your girlfriend in a tiny bikini surrounded by a load of topless men is bound to make anyone feel a bit insecure, and JJ is no exception. He’s put up with a lot and it’s not easy dating someone as famous as Katie. It’s not nice for him to see the photos.

“He’s aware of what people are saying and he tries to ignore the comments, but it’s not easy.”

The former glamour model – who was joined for part of the trip by her son Junior Andre, 20 – was snapped partying with former UFC champion Conor McGregor, EastEnders star Dean Gaffney and night club boss Wayne Lineker, owner of the island’s famous O Beach club.

Her social media posts quickly attracted a slew of critical comments from fans expressing their shock, with many of them calling on JJ – who previously dated his MAFS co-star Ella Morgan – to “dump her” over her disrespectful behaviour.

Some followers called for JJ to end their relationship(Image: GC Images)

“I am in a long-term relationship and out of respect for my partner I wouldn’t pose like this with another man,” one follower wrote. Another demanded, “How can you pose with men like this when having a so-called partner back home?”

Other comments included, “I’d dump her if I was JJ, she’s just rubbing his nose in it”, and “JJ should dump her.”

Katie got together with JJ in early 2024, a few months after she split from her ex-fiancé Carl Woods, 36. She recently described JJ as “the most kindest, genuine, easygoing, chilled person”. But she admitted she still didn’t feel free or at her “happiest”.

“It’s not a reflection on him, maybe that’s what I need to change for myself,” she told Celebs Go Dating’s relationship guru Paul C Brunson on his We Need To Talk podcast.

Katie has often said that men have been her biggest “downfall”, and once admitted she sought out “neediness” and ended up in “toxic relationships”.

Katie started dating JJ shortly after ending her engagement to Carl Woods

As well as her failed marriages to Peter Andre, Alex Reid and Kieran Hayler, Katie has a string of other famous exes, including footballers Dwight Yorke and Teddy Sheringham, and rugby player Danny Cipriani.

She dated her most recent ex, Carl, for three years. He recently accused her of being unfaithful, claiming she cheated on him multiple times and that he’d caught her messaging several footballers, including a “very famous” England star.

However, Katie’s camp hit back, describing him as “another ex cashing in on Kate”.

The star flew out to sunny Spain shortly after having her Brazilian bum lift topped up. Dressed in a bikini, two bloodied plasters on the injection sites were visible on her buttocks. But it was the photos of Katie with UFC legend Conor, 36, and footie icon Gary Lineker’s brother Wayne, 63, that created the biggest furore.

Katie has described men as her ‘downfall’(Image: Getty Images)

According to our source, while JJ trusts Katie and knows she’s happy with him, he’s not immune to feeling insecure over her antics.

“While JJ is a really patient man, everyone has their limits,” the source said. “He’s been there for her through all her surgeries, her bankruptcy hearings, helping with Harvey, so he wants to feel like a priority, not a spare part.

“He knows that she loves him and that she appreciates that he treats her differently to some of her exes, so he works hard to not let it get to him. And he knows that at the end of the day, it’s him she comes home to.”

The ongoing feud between David and Victoria Beckham and their son Brooklyn is escalating, as friends of the family have slammed Brooklyn’s wife Nicola for hurting the family with her ‘pointed’ moves

The feud between Brooklyn and his parents is reported to continue(Image: Instagram/Getty)

The ongoing feud between the Beckhams and their son Brooklyn is only escalating, with friends of David and Victoria’s reportedly accusing Nicola Peltz of “deliberately” rubbing it in. Brooklyn, 26, and his wife Nicola, 30, have distanced themselves from Victoria and David, following a series of snubs.

Although their eldest son Brooklyn and his nepo-baby wife Nicola are keeping quiet on the situation, as are the Beckhams, the couple have been notably absent from a slew of family-centred events and social media posts – or lack thereof – have spoken volumes. The previously close-knit family has gone ahead with events, including David’s 50th birthday celebrations and his long-awaited knighthood, but Brooklyn and Nicola have shunned it all by not turning up to events or acknowledging the special occasions on social media.

Meanwhile, the pair have publicly praised Nicola’s parents numerous times on social media. Back in April, the couple posted an Easter basket they received from her parents, with the pair issuing a ‘thank-you’ to them on Instagram – despite Brooklyn completely ignoring his mum on Mother’s Day just weeks before.

Father’s Day also went without mention from Brooklyn, but Nicola gushed over her father, billionaire businessman and investor Nelson Peltz. According to a friend of the couple, it has been a particularly painful time for the Beckhams.

Brooklyn and Nicola have been locked in a feud with David and Victoria(Image: INSTAGRAM)

Speaking to the Mail, a source said: “It all feels very pointed. Like Brooklyn and Nicola are deliberately trying to rub David and Victoria’s noses in it.”

Elsewhere, a separate source recently claimed that the Beckhams’ attempts to support their kids to stand on their own two feet has been taken as “tight” by the Peltzes. But, after Nicola’s parents gifted her money to buy a £10.5 million mansion in Los Angeles, another source stated Victoria is concerned that her son is trapped.

An insider said that the family were hoping his move to America wouldn’t be “permanent”, but their “house purchase quashes any last hopes”. And with both Nicola and Brooklyn named on the house, he could find it difficult to up and move.

A source told the Mirror: “This house has nothing to do with family dynamics. Both Nicola and Brooklyn’s careers are based in Los Angeles, and Brooklyn spent part of his childhood there while his father played for LA Galaxy.

“During that time, he attended school in LA for several years and built a life and friendships in the city. LA has always felt like home to him.”

The Beckhams are reported to be embroiled in a feud with their son Brooklyn and his wife Nicola(Image: Samir Hussein/WireImage)

But Victoria and David, who both come from working class backgrounds, have always put emphasis on the need for independence. The source added: “When it came to buying this house, of course they weren’t just going to hand their son millions of pounds — what sort of message does that send?”

However, a source close to Brooklyn has slammed the claims as “cruel and baseless”. They claimed: “It’s disappointing—and frankly absurd—that anyone would try to twist Nicola and Brooklyn’s marriage, and this meaningful milestone of home ownership, into something toxic.

“Their relationship is grounded in love, respect, and commitment. The suggestion that Brooklyn is ‘trapped’ isn’t just false—it’s a deliberately cruel and baseless narrative aimed at undermining a strong, loving marriage.”

THE UNVARNISHED TRUTH: BRITAIN MOURNS KIM WOODBURN, THE FEARLESS WORKING-CLASS ICON WHO EXPOSED TV’S HYPOCRISY

Britain awoke this week to the profoundly sad news of Kim Woodburn’s passing at the age of 83, following a short illness. A true titan of the TV industry, Kim was more than just a celebrity; she was a phenomenon. From humble beginnings as a cleaner, she rose to become one of the most beloved and, at times, terrifying figures on our screens, forever altering the landscape of celebrity with her unwavering commitment to honesty. Her death leaves a gaping void in an industry she so gleefully, and rightly, challenged for its “prissiness,” “diva behaviour,” and sheer “duplicity.”

For Dan Wootton, who famously worked with Kim across multiple shows including ITV daytime, Big Brother, Talk Radio, GB News, and her final interview on Outspoken, the loss is deeply personal. “She was truly one of the all-time great British TV icons and for me personally, my all-time favourite guest on every show I’ve worked on,” he shared, highlighting the outpouring of messages from fans who knew how special this formidable woman was to him.

FROM SCRUB BRUSH TO STARDOM: THE AUTHENTICITY OF A CLEANER-TURNED-CELEBRITY

What made Kim Woodburn so utterly unique? Her story was, in itself, an inspiration. A working-class woman who found fame late in life with How Clean Is Your House, she “never forgot her working-class roots.” She famously recalled spending “8 hours a day… cleaning loose cleaning bathrooms sometimes for very rich people.” This gritty reality infused her with an unparalleled sense of perspective and a profound disdain for the artifice of the entertainment world.

This meant Kim had “absolutely no time for the prissiness, the diva behaviour and the duplicity of the TV industry.” She was, as Wootton put it, a woman who would “call a spade a spade.” Unlike so many of her celebrity peers, Kim was famously unafraid to “call out the fellow celebrities,” whether it be the scandal-ridden Philip Schofield or the seemingly untouchable Holly Willoughby.

Her fearless honesty stemmed from a deeply ingrained independence. “I’m in my 80s, I’ve earned more money than I ever believed was possible,” Kim once told Wootton. “I was a cleaner for most of my life so I never, ever thought that I would have this money and so I don’t need to be on TV. I’m not trying to make friends with anyone.” This rare freedom allowed her to speak unvarnished truths that others dared not whisper. It cemented her as a beloved figure, even becoming an unexpected “gay icon” and finding immense popularity among young people on platforms like Cameo, where her famously rude but hilariously honest messages provided comfort and laughter to thousands.

THE QUEEN OF CONFRONTATION: KIM’S MOST EXPLOSIVE TAKEDOWNS

Kim Woodburn’s legacy is etched in the annals of British TV through her iconic confrontations. Who could forget the time Dan Wootton, then editor of The Sun’s Bizarre column, sent Kim to “terrorize the celebrities” on the NTA red carpet? The result was pure, unadulterated chaos and viral gold.

Her razor-sharp tongue spared no one. Take her brutal assessment of Holly Willoughby, who, despite contemplating a return to TV, received a blistering rebuke from Kim: “That little, I’ll bet she does, darling!… She aged and abetted him [Philip Schofield] to take a big salary. Get shot of that little impy wimpy little woman! She will not be missed!” This audacious takedown underscored Kim’s belief that Willoughby had been complicit in Schofield’s alleged wrongdoings and was undeserving of a comeback.

Then there was her savage put-down of Carol Vorderman, whom she simply labelled “nutty, dear.” And the unforgettable moment she confronted Gemma Collins, declaring, “She’s too posh to speak… I thought she was as common as not myself,” and adding, “When you’re as posh as Gemma Collins and you work in TOWIE, you don’t speak to the likes of me!” Kim’s cutting remarks, though seemingly harsh, were rooted in her contempt for celebrity pretension and a demand for genuine connection.

Her philosophy was simple, yet profound: “I’m a kind person, do you know what my love, but I tell it like it is because what’s the point doing anything else? Let’s stop falsifying and lying and covering things we know should be exposed. Stop.” This was Kim Woodburn’s final message, a poignant plea for honesty in an industry drowning in manufactured narratives.

THE AUTHENTIC VOICE: A REBUKE TO METROPOLITAN ELITES

Kim Woodburn’s immense popularity served as a stark contrast to the perceived inauthenticity of much of modern celebrity culture. As panelist Alex Phillips eloquently put it, there aren’t enough people like Kim who, “by force of character, by having some sort of energy, despite where they come from, just steal the nation’s hearts.”

Wootton passionately endorsed this view, confessing his preference for “a Wetherspoons and a private members club,” finding a “culture shock” in London where many are “pretentious” and “don’t actually show their true self.” He argued that the “wonderful thing about the working class is because they haven’t lived a sheltered existence, they see the world exactly as it is because there’s nothing constraining their view.” This sentiment resonated deeply with Emma Dunwell, who added that “people want relatability, people want someone that they can say, ‘you know, yeah, I feel like I’d be able to sit down and have a cup of [tea] with you,’ because that that’s what people want.”

Kim, with her unapologetic honesty and refusal to play the celebrity game, embodied this craving for authenticity. Her death is not just the passing of a TV star; it’s the loss of a rare, unfiltered voice that bravely challenged the “hoyty-toity hair flicky pretentious… nefty metropolitan liberals” of the industry.

A LEGACY THAT WILL ENDURE: WILL BRITAIN EVER SEE HER LIKE AGAIN?

Kim Woodburn was more than an icon; she was an inspiration. Her remarkable journey, her unyielding integrity, and her hilarious, yet often brutal, honesty carved a unique place in the hearts of millions. Darren Donaldson of the Dan Wootton Outspoken Club perfectly encapsulated her spirit, calling her “the best reality TV queen,” part of the Outspoken family, and “one of a kind.” He added that “we will miss her humour, wit and way of words that only she could get away with.”

As Britain mourns this irreplaceable legend, the question lingers: In an age of increasing fakery and carefully curated personas, will we ever again witness a celebrity who dares to be as raw, as real, and as unflinchingly honest as Kim Woodburn? Her death serves as a powerful reminder of the value of authenticity and the enduring appeal of a working-class voice unafraid to speak its truth. Rest in peace, Kim. Your legacy of unfiltered honesty will undoubtedly live on.

ROYAL RUMBLE: MEGHAN MARKLE’S ‘TRUTH’ CLAIMS UNLEASH PALACE FURY AND SHOCKING ALLEGATIONS OF BULLYING AND DECEIT

The carefully constructed narrative of the Sussexes shattered this week as Meghan Markle’s latest podcast interview ignited a firestorm of controversy, forcing Buckingham Palace to issue a veiled, yet chilling, warning. The Duchess of Sussex, in a seemingly innocuous demand for “truth,” has inadvertently thrown open a Pandora’s Box of accusations, including claims of “horrendous bullying,” a “delusional fantasy” existence, and an alleged lack of authenticity that threatens to expose her “carefully crafted” public persona once and for all.

MEGHAN’S ‘TRUTH’: A LIE DETECTOR TEST NO ONE CAN PASS?

In what she framed as an earnest desire for transparency, Meghan Markle declared, “I would ask people to tell the truth” about her royal tenure. Yet, this plea sent shockwaves through royal commentators and insiders, who quickly pointed the finger back at the Duchess herself. As outspoken pundit Dan Wootton passionately argued, “The problem, Meghan, is I don’t think we’re lying a lot of times in the press and the media… She’s lying.”

Britney, from the Royal News Network, echoed this sentiment, stating unequivocally that Meghan “lives in the land of delusion… She has a very tenuous grasp with reality.” The core of the argument? Meghan consistently places “the burden on other people,” always portraying herself as “the victim,” even when “it didn’t erupt out of nothing. Meghan started it and then Meghan perpetuated it.”

The most explosive counter to Meghan’s truth claims lies within the chilling allegations from what sources are calling the “Sussex Survivors Club.” These are former royal employees, some of whom “refer to themselves half-jokingly as the Sussex Survivors Club,” who have spoken of suffering “PTSD after working for the couple.” Others reportedly “feel professionally and personally broken.” These damning claims, detailed by Rebecca English of the Daily Mail, highlight a glaring contradiction: if Meghan truly desires the truth, why has the Palace’s internal bullying report never been released?

“Does she really want to go down this path?” questioned Britney, challenging Meghan to “be brave” and “say that the NDAs no longer apply” for these tormented former staff members. The silence from Montecito on this front speaks volumes, as not “one courtier from the royal family has spoken out in her defense.”

BUCKINGHAM PALACE: A VEILED THREAT FROM THE SILENT POWERHOUSE?

The implications of Meghan’s podcast comments have seemingly pushed Buckingham Palace to the brink. Daily Mail royal editor Rebecca English revealed a stark warning from Palace sources: “Many are loudly wondering why Meghan has raised the issue after all this time and asking pointedly whether she really wants to go down that road again.” The message was chillingly clear: “If she digs too deep into her royal experience, she might not like what comes to the surface.”

This is no mere hint; it’s a thinly veiled threat from the institution known for its “never complain, never explain” motto. As Dan Wootton ominously stated, “The palace is like ‘Hey, we have basically all your dirty laundry here. We have all the skeletons in the closet. We know so much and we are the ones attempting basically to protect her by not releasing the dam at this point.” The implication? Harry and Meghan “don’t actually hold the cards, we do.” The monarchy, it seems, is prepared to fight back if provoked further.

The Palace’s loyalty and integrity, starkly contrasted with the Sussexes’ “complete revisionism” and seeming inability to comprehend “personal dignity and integrity,” underline a deep chasm between the warring factions.

KATE MIDDLETON’S MYSTERY ROYAL ASCOT ABSENCE: NEW FEARS FOR THE PRINCESS?

Amidst the Markle maelstrom, fresh concerns have emerged over the health of the Princess of Wales. Catherine’s last-minute withdrawal from Royal Ascot, leaving Prince William to ride alone with King Charles and Queen Camilla, has sparked renewed speculation and criticism of Kensington Palace’s notoriously slow communication.

Britney highlighted the “30-minute gap between announcing the carriages and revising” the lineup, a “communications mishap” that shouldn’t be happening. “Did they not know this enough ahead of time?” she queried, expressing worry that such missteps fuel “talk about Catherine’s health.” While royal aides briefed on “balancing things after her cancer recovery” and possible heat sensitivity (London temperatures reportedly hit 27°C), the Palace’s fumbling of the announcement only serves to heighten public anxiety. With the public increasingly relying on royal appearances to gauge health, this latest gaffe leaves a nation holding its breath.

TYLER PERRY SEX ASSAULT CLAIMS: MEGHAN’S BILLIONAIRE GODFATHER CAUGHT IN SHOCKING SCANDAL

The drama doesn’t stop there. Meghan Markle’s inner circle is now rocked by a bombshell sexual assault lawsuit filed against Tyler Perry, Lilibet’s godfather and a close confidante. TMZ reports that actor Derek Dixon alleges Perry sexually harassed him and exploited his professional aspirations for personal gain.

This shocking revelation immediately drew comparisons to Meghan’s swift abandonment of former best friend Jessica Mulroney over a relatively minor “racism scandal.” “Do we think… we’re going to see the same thing with Tyler Perry or because he’s a very famous billionaire Meghan Markle is just going to be overlooking these allegations?” Wootton questioned, alleging that Meghan’s “true loyalty in life is money.”

The panel also ripped into Perry’s past behaviour, especially his dismissive comments about the British Royal Family during the Netflix series, where he proudly declared he wouldn’t attend Lilibet’s christening if it meant mixing with “racist” royals. “Who does this guy think he is?” fumed Wootton, highlighting Perry’s hypocrisy given the “cesspool” of Hollywood and contrasting it with the “devout Christian woman” Queen Elizabeth II. “He just went along with Meghan’s lies,” Britney concluded, foreshadowing an “awful conundrum” for those who blindly follow the Duchess’s narrative.

THE ‘AUTHENTICITY’ CHARADE: MEGHAN MARKLE’S CAREFULLY CRAFTED ILLUSION

The overarching theme of the discussion spiralled back to Meghan Markle’s public authenticity – or perceived lack thereof. Her recent “twerking video,” bizarrely presented as evidence of her “authentic self,” was brutally exposed as a four-year-old, “carefully calculated social media strategy.”

Britney lambasted the Duchess for “shilling out her children” and “totally merching off them,” betraying the very reasons she claimed to leave the Royal Family. Meghan’s public persona, critics argue, is nothing but a “constructed delusional Instagram-fueled fantasy” where she believes she is “the queen and everything’s good and that she’s perfect.”

Her constant attempts to “rewrite history,” her refusal to face “serious questions” from anyone not an “enabler,” and her “perpetually endless toxic PR vortex” all point to one glaring truth: “Megan is of course her biggest problem. It’s not the palace. It’s not the press. It’s not the public. Megan is her biggest issue.”

As the royal saga continues to unfold, the lines between truth and fiction blur. But with the Palace now seemingly ready to retaliate and former staff members bravely speaking out, the carefully constructed facade around Meghan Markle appears to be crumbling, threatening to expose a reality far removed from the “chapter of joy” she so desperately preaches. The world waits, breathlessly, to see what “truth” will ultimately emerge.

BRITAIN IN SHOCK: LORRAINE KELLY’S ‘DISGUSTING’ SNUB OF KIM WOODBURN’S DEATH UNLEASHES FURY AS ITV’S ALLEGED HYPOCRISY COMES UNDER FIRE

The nation awoke yesterday to the devastating news of Kim Woodburn’s passing at the age of 83, following a short illness. A beloved figure who rose from a working-class cleaner to a household name, Woodburn was known for her fiery spirit, unapologetic honesty, and a remarkable ability to “burst the bubble” of celebrity pretension. Yet, amidst the outpouring of grief, a storm of outrage has erupted over the “completely inappropriate” manner in which her death was announced live on ITV by veteran presenter Lorraine Kelly.

The fury, first ignited by social media users like John James on X, quickly went viral. James savagely commented on Kelly’s delivery, writing: “I know you’re phoning it in until your contract ends in 2026 but at least announce Kim Woodburn’s death without sounding like you’re talking about road works on the M4 Southbound.”

Dan Wootton, the outspoken host of Outspoken and a former colleague of Kelly’s at ITV, expressed his profound shock and horror. “I was actually so shocked that she even agreed to read it,” he declared, given his ten-year tenure on Kelly’s show. Wootton passionately argued that if one “hate[s] someone that much that you cannot even show one ounce of sympathy or empathy about their death – remember this is not a murderer, this is not a criminal, this is not even a politician who you don’t like – this is a celebrity beloved by many millions… then you know what, say nothing. Say nothing, refuse to read the statement because I’m sorry Lorraine, this just makes you look so bad.”

The cold, clinical tone of the announcement, which merely stated Woodburn had died, before abruptly cutting to “here with the stories that have got us all talking this morning,” left many viewers aghast. Critics are calling it a public display of professional animosity, a “disgusting” lack of grace in the face of death, and a betrayal of the millions who adored Woodburn.

KIM WOODBURN: THE FEARLESS TRUTH-TELLER WHO EXPOSED ‘WOKEAI TV’

Kim Woodburn was more than just a TV personality; she was a phenomenon. Her journey from a working-class cleaner to one of Britain’s most “outrageous” and authentic onscreen favourites resonated deeply with the public. Her appeal lay in her brutal honesty and her refusal to conform to the polished, often insincere, world of celebrity. As Wootton proudly stated, “She would burst the bubble so often of pressy TV celebrities, especially those working for ITV daytime.”

This unvarnished truth-telling inevitably led to clashes with the establishment, particularly “Wokeai TV” (ITV) and its flagship shows. Woodburn’s infamous on-air confrontation with the panel of Loose Women remains etched in public memory. It was this explosive encounter, insiders claim, that led to her alleged blacklisting at the broadcaster.

“She was blacklisted at the broadcaster, she was despised at the broadcaster and they were very, very sensitive to her ongoing criticism,” Wootton asserted. The reason, he explained, was simple: “most celebrities are not prepared to call out Wokeai TV but Kim was.” Her secret weapon? Her financial independence. “Dad, I don’t need the money,” Woodburn famously told Wootton, “I’m a cleaner. I spent decades of my life scrubbing other people’s toilets. I never believed that I would earn thousands and thousands of pounds for appearing on screen.” This freedom meant Kim was “prepared to say the unsayable about some people who were considered untouchable in the TV industry, including for a period of time Philip Schofield and Holly Willoughby.”

Her sharp wit and uncompromising views extended far beyond the confines of daytime television. In one of her final interviews, Woodburn delivered a scathing assessment of David Beckham’s pursuit of a knighthood, stating, “If he crawls anymore to be get a knighthood, he’s got a permanent brown ring around his nose, dear.” She lamented that King Charles appeared to have been “fooled” by Beckham’s PR efforts, unlike the shrewd Queen Elizabeth II. This unvarnished honesty, which saw her criticise figures like Schofield and Willoughby for allegedly “sneak[ing] in” to the Queen’s funeral queue, solidified her status as a working-class hero who genuinely spoke for the common person.

THE HONOURS SYSTEM UNDER SCRUTINY: RIGGED AND CORRUPT?

The conversation around Kim Woodburn’s fearless integrity inevitably led to a broader critique of the British honours system. Father Calvin Robinson highlighted the perceived decline in the significance of these awards, stating, “It’s not a sign of honour or duty or service to the nation anymore, is it?” He questioned “what the real processes and how these deals are made, who arranges it and what actually they have to do in order to get it.”

Raja, a respected Muslim campaigner who himself holds an MBE, echoed these concerns, admitting he now feels “the honours system is just totally corrupt.” He cited the controversial knighthood of Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, who, Raja claimed, “won’t even admit by the way that rape gangs even exist,” as evidence that the system is “all fixed.” Though he accepted his MBE out of respect for his mother and the late Queen, Raja conceded that “the system is rigged and it’s increasingly about backs slapping those.”

These revelations paint a damning picture of an elite establishment seemingly detached from public sentiment, where accolades are bestowed not on merit, but through backroom deals and political convenience.

THE PANEL’S VERDICT: LORRAINE’S SNUB IS ITV’S SHAME

The reaction from Outspoken‘s panel was a unanimous condemnation of Lorraine Kelly’s handling of the death announcement. Father Calvin Robinson firmly stated, “If you have nothing nice to say, don’t say anything at all. I don’t understand why Lorraine had to read that out. She didn’t have to have that on her show.” He concluded with a heartfelt tribute to Woodburn: “I think Kim Woodburn was fantastic, I think she was great fun… I hope she rests in peace and may light perpetual shine upon her.”

Raja added further insight, suggesting Kelly “underestimated the popularity of Kim Woodburn who in recent years has become almost like a cultlike figure.” He celebrated Woodburn as a “legend” whose forthright and unpolished nature set her apart from the “entire world [at ITV] that didn’t really have time for her.” The background music played during Kelly’s announcement, he noted, further underscored the perceived disdain.

Ultimately, both panellists agreed that Kelly’s actions were less about Kim Woodburn and more a “reflection of them [the establishment] rather than any reflection on Kim.”

Kim Woodburn’s death has, ironically, become her final act of truth-telling. The controversy surrounding Lorraine Kelly’s announcement has ripped open a wound in the heart of British media, exposing alleged hypocrisy, blacklisting, and a deep-seated disconnect between the public and the celebrity elite. As the nation mourns its fearless cleaner-turned-star, the question lingers: will this unprecedented fury finally force the establishment to confront its own uncomfortable truths? Or will Kim Woodburn’s legacy simply be another inconvenient truth that the “Wokeai TV” gatekeepers attempt to bury? Only time will tell.

THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH: STUNNING STATISTICS AND THE PERPETRATORS

For years, voices have been silenced, and legitimate concerns dismissed as “racist,” yet the horrifying reality of child sexual exploitation (CSE) in the UK has festered under a blanket of institutional denial. Now, the lid is being blown off, and the figures are stark.

During a blistering segment on Dan Wootton’s Outspoken, Father Calvin Robinson, a prominent commentator, dropped a bombshell statistic that cuts to the heart of the scandal. He asserted that while the “Pakistani Muslim demographic makes up what 4% of the population in Britain, they account for 65% of the child sexual abuse and child sexual exploitation.” This figure, he insists, demands immediate attention and action.

The hotly debated Casey Report, a 197-page document examining institutional failings in dealing with CSE, reportedly made clear “in very sensitive terms that the issue is indeed Pakistani Muslim men.” Despite this, numerous mainstream media figures and politicians have faced accusations of deliberately downplaying or distorting these facts.

Sheila Fogerty of LBC and Susanna Reid of Good Morning Britain (GMB) have been singled out for what critics allege is a concerted effort to “gaslight the nation with made-up nonsense figures.” A caller on Outspoken, identified as John, emphatically stated that “It’s 90% Pakistani men,” challenging Fogerty’s dismissals. He further claimed that grooming gangs involved in “drugs and pimping them out” are overwhelmingly “Pakistani grooving gangs.”

THE ELITE’S BETRAYAL: A DECADES-LONG COVER-UP

The core accusation shaking the foundations of British politics is that the “Westminster establishment and corrupted British MSM” engaged in a massive, multi-decade cover-up, effectively “trading children for votes.” Critics charge that a liberal elite, obsessed with protecting a “multicultural utopia,” willingly sacrificed the safety of vulnerable children to avoid uncomfortable truths.

Raja, a Muslim campaigner and former government advisor who received an MBE for his work in child safeguarding, shared a chilling account of how “they always knew the truth and they hid behind these reports, these lies, these fake data sets and the platforms that they had.” He described how those who dared to speak out, including himself, were “demonized” and “blacklisted from the mainstream media.” Raja even alleged he was “maliciously prosecuted” with “falsified evidence” and that the mainstream media “printed lies that I had been arrested as part of a child sex exploitation ring myself.” He painted a grim picture of “the entire machinery of the state” mobilizing to “facilitate this cover up.”

This isn’t just about child abuse, Raja tragically declared, but about “our children were sold as currency for votes.” He spoke of how government ministers and BBC journalists allegedly “were complicit… in hiding how children in my town were being dragged off the streets, pulled into shisha bars where they being drugged and gang raped in rooms that they rented out by the hour. They all knew.”

The frustration and outrage among those who have fought for justice is palpable. Dan Wootton accused figures like Lewis Goodall of “pretending to care about the facts when he for years has been an activist presenter accusing people like Suella Braverman of all sorts for stating the facts.” He further slammed Jess Phillips, Owen Jones, and Keir Starmer, alleging they too are “scumbag liars” who played a part in the political cover-up.

VOICES OF THE VINDICATED: TRUTH-TELLERS EMERGE FROM THE SHADOWS

For years, individuals like Tommy Robinson, who raised the alarm about these gangs, were demonized, imprisoned, and vilified as “racists.” Now, in a shocking turn of events, official reports and public outcry are starting to vindicate their warnings.

Tommy Robinson, reflecting on the news of a national inquiry, stated, “I never wanted to be in a position of saying, ‘I told you so’. I came out of prison all guns blazing after 7 months in solitary and in all honesty it’s hit me and I feel wrecked.” Yet, he emphasized, “whatever any of us has gone through is nothing in comparison to what so many of Britain’s daughters were subjected to.” He chillingly added, “The public still have no idea the true scale of this rape jihad.”

Raja, a man of immense credibility who advised the government and dedicated 25 years to safeguarding children, recounted his harrowing journey. He described confronting evidence of “children being systematically gang raped on an industrial scale religiously justified racially motivated.” Despite his credentials and his position within the Muslim community, he was “rebuffed so many times” and still remains “blacklisted” by the mainstream media.

“This is simply a fight between good and evil,” Raja passionately concluded, “and these people are evil and the people who protect them are just as evil.” He accused politicians of “protecting these children for votes,” citing “dossiers of evidence that clearly demonstrated that serving government ministers were complicit with BBC journalists in hiding” the atrocities.

THE BATTLE FOR BRITAIN’S SOUL: A SOCIETY IN DECLINE?

The gravity of the situation has led to calls for drastic measures. Father Calvin Robinson, reflecting on the 65% statistic, provocatively questioned, “What we should be arguing over is how do we deport every single Pakistani Muslim in Britain if there’s a clear there’s a clear problem with that particular community that is harming and raping our literally allowing people to rape young British girls?” He even suggested bringing back the death penalty for such “horrible abuses.”

This profound distrust in the establishment, fuelled by revelations of the alleged cover-up, is seen by some as a symptom of a deeper societal decline. “The fact that the MSM, the fact that our elite class remain in denial over this scandal, proves that we are unfortunately a society in decline,” Dan Wootton lamented.

The conversation reveals a chasm between the public, who overwhelmingly support measures like the death penalty for heinous child crimes, and politicians who are “very few… prepared to back it.” As the truth slowly but inexorably emerges, the future of the current government and the Labour Party hangs in the balance. Raja’s stark warning remains: “Once the truth comes out, this government will fall and the Labor Party will be finished because they traded children for votes.” The moral stain, as Elon Musk declared, “cannot be washed away.” The fight for justice, and for the soul of Britain, has only just begun.

LONDON, UK – The Montecito bubble has BURST! Meghan Markle is reportedly in a full-blown CRISIS this week, reeling from a devastating series of epic disasters that threaten to shatter her carefully constructed Hollywood empire. From a “car crash” interview that spectacularly backfired to explosive sex assault allegations against her closest confidant, and a brutal snub from her favourite magazine, the Duchess of Sussex is facing an unprecedented meltdown!

Sources close to the Royal Family are suggesting that the late Queen Elizabeth II herself had already seen the writing on the wall, with a single, arrogant word from Prince Harry cementing her belief that there was “no going back” for the renegade royals. As the Sussexes’ world crumbles, the Princess of Wales, Catherine, is quietly soaring to new heights, embodying the poise and strength of a “Queen in waiting” – a stark contrast to a visibly “broken” and “directionless” Prince Harry.

MEGHAN’S INTERVIEW FIASCO: A “CAR CRASH” DISASTER!

The Duchess’s much-hyped “Tall” interview with Emma Greed Day, intended as a glittering relaunch, has instead become a monumental PR catastrophe. Figures are devastating: after just 24 hours, the interview had a paltry 88,000 views, a mere 4,439 likes, but an astonishing 11,000 DISLIKES! That means a crushing 71% dislike ratio!

Royal YouTube sensation P. Dina, speaking exclusively on Outspoken, didn’t mince words: “Meghan can’t ever seem to climb up to get above all the things that are happening to her and anything that she does will continually fail.” She added, “No one’s going to give her grace, no one’s going to give her a real opportunity to shine the way she thinks she should be shining.”

The backlash, according to P. Dina, stems directly from Meghan’s past treatment of the late Queen and the Royal Family. “People will never forget,” she declared. “She has done horrible things to a very powerful and beloved woman of the monarchy. She cannot move forward ever. It’s just not going to happen.”

P. Dina branded Meghan a “laughing stock,” “so cringe,” and predicted she’d keep trying to “divert people’s attention” but ultimately fail. “She’s trying to save face in this moment, but she knows she’s embarrassed,” P. Dina insisted, “She wishes she could take it down… it wasn’t going to help her get more sales.”

PEOPLE MAGAZINE’S BRUTAL SNUB: TEAM CATHERINE NOW!

Adding insult to injury, People magazine – long considered Meghan’s go-to publication and favourite media ally – has spectacularly abandoned “Team Sussex.” After years of exclusive access, sympathetic profiles, and even Meghan personally launching products through their pages, People has now gone public with a dazzling cover story on the Princess of Wales.

The headline alone is a dagger to Meghan’s heart: “There are some major shifts coming as Princess Kate privately rebuilds after a year of cancer treatment. She’s stepping out with a new purpose and the poise of a queen in waiting.”

“This is Meghan’s biggest PR failure in recent months,” Outspoken host Dan Wootton charged. “She worked so hard to get People on side… they gave everything to this magazine and the trade-off was: People, you need to back us, you can’t back our enemy. And yet, this cover of Catherine is everything that Meghan hates.”

P. Dina explained the cold, hard truth: “People magazine cares about its readers and its sales and they simply cannot pretend that Catherine doesn’t exist.” She lauded Kate’s “strength in her silence,” her “poise and grace,” and how she “naturally attracted” adoration. “Meghan is in a position now where she’s going to keep trying to fight for something that she’ll never get and Catherine will always supersede her in everything that she does because she is so beloved by the people.”

HARRY’S HAUNTING DECLINE: A “BROKEN MAN” LOST IN THE SHADOWS!

As Meghan’s ventures crash and burn, Prince Harry himself appears to be spiralling into a deep personal crisis. Recent public appearances have painted a stark picture of a Duke who looks “increasingly miserable and directionless and sort of vacant.”

Outspoken aired two recent clips of Harry speaking – one in German to armed forces, another for his Travalyst initiative. Dan Wootton grimly assessed: “It’s the worst I’ve ever seen him. He looks and feels broken… it’s like he doesn’t believe what he’s saying. He’s going through the motions… he looks like a broken man, almost admitting defeat here.”

P. Dina echoed the chilling observation: “He is so flat and has his head in the paper, he can’t even look up to talk about something that he started… he’s doing this because… he’s pimping himself out to make his money.”

She painted a bleak image of Harry as a man who has “lost his way,” “depressed,” and “not happy.” P. Dina shockingly predicted “health issues” for Harry and a continuing “downward spiral,” stating, “Megan’s heartlessness… Harry and his feelings are a second thought to her. It’s really sad.”

The emotional toll of his decisions is now plainly visible. “He was warned,” Dan Wootton declared, adding: “After what he has put his family through, I think this is deserved. I think it’s karma.”

LILIBET’S GODFATHER ROCKER: SEX ASSAULT ALLEGATIONS SHAKE SUSSEX CIRCLE!

The latest bombshell to hit Meghan’s world are the explosive sex assault allegations against her closest friend and Lilibet’s godfather, Hollywood mogul Tyler Perry. This is the same Tyler Perry who arrogantly flaunted his “moral superiority” in the Netflix series, boasting he wouldn’t attend a Church of England christening for Lilibet with the late Queen.

P. Dina revealed insider knowledge: “I’ve been hearing a lot about Tyler Perry for a long time… So it’s known in the industry, is it? Well, yeah… Tyler Perry, he’s got somewhat of a reputation behind the scenes.”

And in a jaw-dropping revelation, P. Dina claimed: “I heard that Meghan is trying to get the relationship with Tyler Perry unulled in the church. She’s trying to go back on him being the godfather of Lilibet.” This echoes Meghan’s infamous track record of “throwing people under the bus,” as seen with Jessica Mulroney.

P. Dina concluded that Perry, once Meghan’s “one supporting ally,” is now “gone,” unable to “help and support her with anything.” His legal woes will “further taint her image.” The hasty decision to make him godfather, without truly knowing his character, is now proving to be another costly mistake for the Duchess.

KATE’S HEALTH SCARE: PALACE COMMUNICATIONS UNDER FIRE (AGAIN)!

Amidst the Sussex chaos, concern briefly flickered over Catherine, the Princess of Wales, who pulled out of Royal Ascot at the last minute. Buckingham Palace quickly issued a statement insisting “there was nothing to worry about” and it was simply a “case of crossed wires” – effectively blaming a “technical error.”

However, Outspoken host Dan Wootton remained skeptical. “If Buckingham Palace always told the truth about members of the Royal Family and their health, maybe we could believe this briefing,” he stated, highlighting a pattern of opaque communication. “Royal Ascot don’t just make those types of mistakes.”

While both Wootton and P. Dina gave Catherine “full grace” given her ongoing cancer treatment and the UK’s record-breaking heat, they criticized Kensington Palace’s “botched communication strategy.” “You have to almost be truthful about something like this because it could happen again,” P. Dina warned, advocating for greater transparency to manage public expectations.

THE QUEEN’S FINAL VERDICT: “NO GOING BACK” AFTER HARRY’S WORD!

Perhaps the most damning revelation comes from royal editor Rebecca English in the Daily Mail, who reported that a single word from Prince Harry – “collaborate” – was the tipping point for the late Queen Elizabeth II, making her realize there was “no going back.”

This word, used when Harry outlined his desire for a “hybrid” royal role, demonstrated a shocking level of perceived arrogance towards the monarch. “You don’t say you’re going to collaborate with the Queen!” P. Dina exclaimed, noting that the Queen, not the Sussexes, makes the decisions.

P. Dina interpreted English’s article as a sign that the Royal Family is now “mighty fed up with Megan and are going to hit her back if necessary!” She cited English’s knowledge of staff “damaged by Megan being absolutely vile to them” as a key reason for the Palace’s hardened stance.

The era of royal silence appears to be over. As Meghan’s public image crumbles under the weight of “vulgar” antics and “too many lies,” the Royal Family, once stoic, seems ready to finally push back against the relentless attacks. The Montecito nightmare is far from over, and the consequences of the Sussexes’ choices are now cascading down upon them.

LONDON, UK – The House of Windsor is reeling today from an EXPLOSIVE series of revelations that expose Prince Harry’s alleged “meltdown” and plunge the Sussexes deeper into their Montecito misery! Shocking reports suggest the Duke is undergoing “bad dad therapy” over terrifying fears he’ll become a “deadbeat father like King Charles,” while Meghan Markle has been caught in a BLATANT LIE about her children’s supposed farmers’ market antics, leading to a humiliating public fact-check!

And in a bombshell twist, royal insiders are now claiming the late Queen Elizabeth II herself realized there was “no going back” with the renegade royals after just ONE WORD from Harry – paving the way for a fierce new counter-attack from a Royal Family “mighty fed up” with the Sussexes’ “vulgar” antics!

HARRY’S THERAPY HELL: IS HE HEADED FOR DEADBEAT DAD DISASTER?!

The astonishing claims emerged from Radar Online’s Matthew Acton, who reports a “petrified Prince Harry is seeing a therapist to avoid becoming a deadbeat dad like Prince Charles.” The Duke reportedly still harbours deep resentment over Charles’s “cruelty” towards Princess Diana, haunted by his mother’s agonizing confessions.

The report dramatically recounts Diana’s alleged words: that Charles’s very first reaction to Harry’s birth was a sneering dig about his red hair – “Oh god it’s a boy and he’s even got red hair” – implying a cruel jibe about James Hewitt and leaving Diana feeling “closed off.” Diana even claimed she hid Harry’s gender from Charles, knowing his desire for a girl!

According to sources, Harry is “racked with fear he will fall into the classic trap of repeating mistakes from the past,” seeing therapy as a desperate attempt to be “the best dad possible to his son Archie and little girl Lilibet.” His therapy, they say, is “classic blame the parents stuff.”

But royal biographer and long-time Harry expert, Angela Levin, BLASTED these claims on Outspoken, offering a powerful counter-narrative that exposes the gaping holes in the Radar Online report.

“This feeling that he has that Diana said that… Charles didn’t want another boy, right?” Levin scoffed. “In my book… Charles was there for the whole of the birth… and he said afterwards it was a marvelous experience!”

Levin quoted Charles’s own joyous words from a month after Harry’s birth, when he told American television that Harry was “absolutely adorable,” and that having a second child made them “really relaxed as a parent.” He even gushed, “Harry is extraordinarily good, he sleeps marvelously and he eats very well!”

“Don’t tell me that’s somebody who wanted a girl!” Levin fumed. “He loved him! What he might have said is ‘Oh, I’d have loved a little girl, oh never mind.’ But it’s not actually that it’s the end of the world, and he wasn’t actually against him in any way.”

Levin didn’t mince words, accusing Harry of deliberately trying to “make his father actually really ill” with his relentless public attacks. She argued that Harry’s current therapy is utterly pointless if he’s not willing to apologize and change his ways. “There’s no point going to a psychiatrist or anybody like that if you’re still living in that in that place,” she warned. “He’s got to recover himself before he can actually get help and he won’t listen to anybody else but Megan. Megan gives him advice and tells him what to do… this is the only thing he’s got is her, isn’t it, and the children.”

HARRY’S HUMILIATING PUBLIC MELTDOWN: A “BROKEN MAN”

The alarming reports come as Prince Harry himself appeared utterly “broken” and “vacant” in recent public appearances. Outspoken presenter Dan Wootton showed astonishing footage of Harry delivering speeches – one for his Travalyst venture and another in German to the armed forces – that painted a stark picture of a Duke on the brink.

Wootton pulled no punches: “It’s the worst I’ve ever seen him. He looks and feels broken… it’s like he doesn’t believe what he’s saying. He’s going through the motions, isn’t it?” He described Harry as looking like he had “lost the will to live.”

Levin sadly concurred: “It’s very, very sad. He has to change the direction of what he’s doing.” She reiterated that Meghan, rather than helping him heal, “likes him just to be servile.” The message was clear: Harry needs to “grow up and apologize” to his family, but his fiercely protective wife seems to prevent any genuine reconciliation. “It’s his fault,” Levin stated bluntly, “The way he behaved on the BBC was disgusting, his book was disgusting, the interviews are disgusting.”

MEGHAN CAUGHT! THE FARMERS’ MARKET LIE EXPOSED!

Just when you thought the Sussex saga couldn’t get any more bizarre, Meghan Markle has been caught in a BLATANT, verifiable lie! The Duchess had previously spun a fairytale in her now infamous “car crash” Emma Greed Day interview, claiming she took Archie and Lilibet to “sell their homegrown fruit and veg at the local market in Montecito” to teach them the “value of money.”

Angela Levin immediately raised red flags on Outspoken, asking why there had been NO PICTURES of such a supposedly wholesome, public family activity. Now, the truth has emerged, thanks to X (formerly Twitter) and its “Community Notes” feature – a reader-generated fact-check that exposes public deception.

A devastating note was added to Meghan’s interview clip, stating: “You need certification and approval in order to sell produce and other items privately. Their family is not listed.“

“That proves such a lot, doesn’t it?” Levin declared, “It was just a lie! Oh my goodness!”

Levin systematically dismantled Meghan’s fanciful tale: “It didn’t make sense to me that you would let a four-year-old and a six-year-old go and tell them… they can go and sell vegetables… would she leave them by themselves? Where was she? Who was there looking after them for goodness sake? Someone can come up and actually be very difficult or steal them or actually run off with them if they recognize them somehow by their backs or by their hair!”

She concluded that Meghan was “very, very nervous” during the interview, “coming out with more and more things that come into her head and actually were nonsense.” The Duke and Duchess of Disinformation strike again!

THE QUEEN’S FURY: ONE WORD THAT SEALED THE SUSSEX FATE!

And the revelations kept coming! Royal editor Rebecca English has sensationally claimed in the Daily Mail that just ONE WORD from Prince Harry ultimately made the late Queen Elizabeth II realize there was “no going back” for the Sussexes.

That word? “Collaborate.”

Levin explained the gravity of this seemingly innocuous term. Back in 2020, when Harry and Meghan declared their intent to “leave” but still “pop in and pop out” of royal duties, Harry used the word “collaborate” when discussing their future with his grandmother.

“You don’t say you’re going to collaborate with the Queen!” Levin exclaimed. “Certainly not the late Queen Elizabeth, because you can’t have it your way! She’s the Queen, she makes the decisions!”

Levin interpreted English’s bombshell report as a clear signal from the Palace: “The Royal Family are now mighty fed up with Megan and are going to hit her back if necessary! That’s my reading of it!”

She further revealed that English’s reporting cited “staff who have been really damaged by Megan being absolutely vile to them. They were people who’d helped her for a long time.” This is a damning indictment, suggesting Meghan’s alleged mistreatment of staff is finally prompting the Palace to break its silence.

The dignified silence of the Monarchy is cracking under the strain of Meghan’s “vulgar” antics and “too many lies.” It appears the gloves are off, and the Royal Family is finally preparing to hit back against the couple who have relentlessly attacked them.

As Outspoken proudly announced reaching a stunning 400,000 YouTube subscribers this week – a testament to its fearless, truth-telling journalism – the public waits with bated breath to see if Harry can escape his alleged “meltdown” and if Meghan’s house of lies will finally collapse. The drama, it seems, is far from over!

LONDON, UK – Britain is on the cusp of a seismic societal shift, as Reform UK leader Nigel Farage blasts onto the scene with a radical, multi-billion-pound pledge to tackle the nation’s “plummeting birth rate” – igniting a ferocious debate about women’s roles, family finance, and the very fabric of modern life! But just as Farage makes waves, a shocking new frontline has opened in the culture wars: a furious clash over the right to child-free peace and quiet, as France mulls a draconian ban on adult-only spaces!

The burning questions on everyone’s lips: Is Farage’s plan a stroke of genius, or a fiscal fantasy? And should holidaymakers be forced to endure screaming toddlers when they’ve paid for a tranquil getaway? Loose Women exploded into a heated debate this week, laying bare the deeply divided nation.

FARAGE’S BILLION-POUND BABIES BOMBSHELL!

Nigel Farage, riding high in the polls and seemingly unstoppable, has declared his intent to make it “easier for people to have children.” His Reform UK party is promising a bold package of incentives: tax breaks for married couples and, controversially, scrapping the two-child benefit cap. Farage’s shock claim? That the “majority of mothers would choose to stay at home more if they could.”

But is this a realistic assessment of modern motherhood, or just another political fantasy? Loose Women‘s Jane Moore voiced scepticism, admitting that while “more than currently do” might choose to stay home if they could afford it, the idea of a “majority” seemed “a little bit off-kilter.”

“A lot can’t [stay at home] because they can’t afford to,” Jane pointed out, highlighting the harsh reality that many families rely on two incomes just “to pay the bills and the mortgage.”

The stakes are incredibly high. With Britain’s birth rate in freefall, experts warn of a looming crisis for the future workforce. Janet Street-Porter passionately argued that many women do want to have more children or stay at home, but are simply “priced out” of parenthood. “Should there be incentives for women to be able to get [to] well… one of the biggest incentives must be that childcare should be affordable for all,” she thundered.

THE SCANDINAVIAN DREAM: A LESSON FOR BROKEN BRITAIN?

The panel turned its gaze to the seemingly utopian childcare models of Scandinavia, where countries like Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and Finland boast what they call “childcare infrastructure.” These nations have meticulously designed tax and pension systems, bolstered by strong unions, to ensure women have a “true choice” about returning to work after childbirth.

“They subsidize up to 85% of childcare costs,” Jane revealed, painting a picture of state-supported nurseries, kindergartens, and after-school care. The result? More women in the workforce, achieving higher levels in their careers.

While critics might point to the smaller populations of these Nordic nations (Sweden, for instance, has just 10 million people compared to England’s 57 million), the Loose Women panel stressed that this was a deliberate “political decision” in those countries. In stark contrast, Britain’s “piecemeal approach” leaves young people drowning in financial despair.

“More and more young people say, ‘I can’t afford kids, I can’t afford somewhere to live, and I can’t afford to have [them],’” Janet lamented, highlighting the “depressing” reality for an entire generation. Is Farage’s grand plan truly the answer, or just an expensive promise with no clear funding path? As Jane wisely observed, “He’s making an awful lot of promises and it’s going to cost billions and there doesn’t seem to be much of an indication about where those billions are going to come from. There is no magic money tree.”

THE WAR ON PEACE AND QUIET: FRANCE’S BANNING BLITZ!

But the debate over family life took an even more explosive turn with news from across the Channel! The French government is reportedly considering a staggering move: banning adult-only hotels, campsites, and restaurants! This drastic measure is part of a plan to “crack down on the no kids movement,” with the French high commissioner for childhood bizarrely claiming that those who complain about noisy children are “spreading the idea that children are a nuisance.”

Janet Street-Porter, a vocal proponent of child-free escapes, unleashed her fury. “I hate the word ban!” she declared, explaining her personal choice to seek out adult-only hotels now that her own children are grown. “If you don’t want to be surrounded by children then I think that’s absolutely fine for you to go on an adult-only holiday!”

She drew a clear line in the sand: if you choose a hotel that isn’t adult-only, then you must “expect there’s kids there.” But if you’ve worked hard, saved your money, and chosen a specific venue for peace, the rules should be respected. “If I go out for a meal after 7:00 in the evening, I’m not very happy if I’m in quite a nice restaurant [and] there’s a load of screaming kids running around,” Janet fumed.

The panel delved into the nuance: Is it the children themselves, or the parents who let them “run riot”? Jane admitted she has “no issue at all with well-behaved kids or… parents who are just like going ‘Oh god!’”, but conceded, “I don’t like kids when I’m eating my dinner!”

“I WANT CHILD-FREE ZONES ON PLANES!”

Janet then delivered the ultimate rallying cry for peace-seekers everywhere: “Planes are the worst places! I want child-free zones on planes!” The idea of paying extra for a tranquil flight, only to see a baby being carried down the aisle, left her “manifesting” a silent journey. (Though she later hilariously clarified, “No, I came out fully formed as a child,” after a cheeky comment about her own infancy!).

While acknowledging that some hotels offer a compromise with “adult-only pools,” the underlying sentiment remained clear: there’s a growing demand for tranquil spaces. As one panelist eloquently put it, while they enjoy “hearing kids being happy and playing,” constant “shrieking” is a definite “oh no!”

The message from the British public is resounding. An exclusive Loose Women poll revealed a STAGGERING 84% of their audience would prefer to stay at an adult-only hotel! Only a mere 16% said no.

This is a nation yearning for choice, for tailored experiences, whether it’s the freedom to raise a larger family with government support, or the right to enjoy a quiet meal without a chorus of toddler tantrums. As Farage battles for the future of Britain’s birth rate, a quieter, yet equally passionate, battle is raging for the sanctity of your holidays and dinner plans. The question remains: In this escalating culture war, who will truly win the right to live life on their own terms?

Montecito, California – The once-glittering façade of the Sussexes’ Californian dream is CRUMBLING today as Meghan Markle finds herself engulfed in a catastrophic, multi-pronged crisis that threatens to shatter her carefully constructed global empire! From a humiliating interview flop to explosive sex assault allegations against her closest confidante, and now, the ultimate betrayal from her former media allies at People magazine – it seems the Duchess of Disaster has finally hit rock bottom!

The ground is literally SHAKING in Montecito, and it’s not from an earthquake! The first seismic shockwave came from Meghan’s cringe-inducing “chat” with BFF Emma Greed. This was meant to be the triumphant relaunch of her ill-fated “Archetypes” podcast, a global PR coup! Instead, it’s a colossal, unmitigated DISASTER!

Royal commentator Stephanie Sidley highlighted the jaw-dropping statistics that expose the interview’s epic failure. After a mere 24 hours, the video had only scraped together a measly 88,000 views, garnering just 4,439 likes… but a staggering 11,000 dislikes! That’s a brutal 71% dislike ratio! The comments section, according to insiders, is an absolute goldmine of mockery and ridicule. This wasn’t a comeback; it was a public execution!

But the humiliation doesn’t end there for the Duchess of Debacles! Just when she thought things couldn’t get any worse, her beloved best friend and, shockingly, Lilibet’s godfather, Tyler Perry, finds himself embroiled in sickening sex assault allegations! Perry, the man who pompously told the world he was too morally superior to attend Lilibet’s christening in a Church of England ceremony with the late Queen, is now facing a lawsuit rife with disturbing text messages!

As Dan Wootton rightly pointed out, Perry, the self-proclaimed paragon of virtue, appears to be anything but. Royal expert P. Dina, appearing on Outspoken, dropped an even more explosive revelation: “I heard that Meghan is trying to get the relationship with Tyler Perry un-nulled in the church! She’s trying to go back on him being the godfather of Lily!” This is classic Meghan: when someone becomes inconvenient, she throws them under the bus faster than you can say “privacy!”

But perhaps the most devastating blow of all comes from a source Meghan once considered her most loyal media ally: People magazine! For years, this publication has been her personal PR mouthpiece, churning out sycophantic spreads and giving her exclusive interviews. Harry himself, it’s been revealed, was even directly emailing them with stories! They were Team Meghan, through and through!

UNTIL NOW!

In a truly astonishing betrayal, People magazine’s latest cover screams a triumphant headline that will send Meghan spiralling: “KATE’S SUMMER OF STRENGTH!” The accompanying article gushes about “major shifts coming as Princess Kate privately rebuilds after a year of cancer treatment,” hailing her “new purpose and the poise of a queen in waiting!”

P. Dina captured Meghan’s likely fury perfectly: “This is going to devastate Meghan Markle because it shows that her whole PR strategy has not worked because at the end of the day People magazine cares about its readers and its sales and they simply cannot pretend that Catherine doesn’t exist!” This is the ultimate slap in the face, a public declaration that the world’s attention has irrevocably shifted from the attention-seeking Duchess to the dignified, resilient Princess of Wales.

Meanwhile, the sad spectacle of Prince Harry continues. He’s increasingly described as “miserable,” “directionless,” and “vacant” in his public appearances. Dan Wootton played clips of Harry delivering speeches – one in German to the armed forces, another on “sustainable tourism” for his Travalyst venture – that painted a grim picture.

Harry’s delivery was flat, lifeless, and utterly devoid of passion. “This is a man who knows he’s lost,” Wootton declared, arguing Harry is “pimping himself out” for money, simply “going through the motions.” P. Dina agreed, lamenting Harry’s “monotone” face and lack of “excitement.” “This man has lost everything,” she stated, predicting further “decline” and even “health issues” for the beleaguered Prince. His isolation in Montecito and Meghan’s “heartlessness” are clearly taking their toll.

The contrast with Kate couldn’t be starker. While Meghan’s ventures flounder, Kate, despite her ongoing cancer recovery, continues to inspire. Her recent last-minute withdrawal from Royal Ascot, initially causing “chaos and panic” at the Palace, was ultimately handled with a grace that Meghan could only dream of.

Despite initial fears and the Palace’s rather clumsy communication – which blamed a “clerical error” for Kate’s name appearing on the carriage list – sources now suggest it was simply a case of exhaustion from her demanding schedule, exacerbated by the scorching UK heat. As P. Dina noted, Kate’s commitment to duty is so strong that any pull-out “has to be something somewhat serious.”

Wootton conceded that Kate has “done so much more… than we ever thought that she would at this point,” acknowledging earlier predictions that she might never return to a full schedule of royal duties. He gives Kate “full grace” for prioritising her health, but, ever the truth-seeker, he insists on honesty from the Palace. “Royal Ascot don’t just make those types of mistakes,” he stressed, questioning Kensington Palace’s “botched” communication strategy. The public, he argued, deserves the truth, even if it’s “uncomfortable.”

But back to Meghan’s catalogue of catastrophic failures. The apricot spread and honey follow the “limited edition” jam that reportedly only sold a paltry 10 pots! And now, the Duchess is set to launch a rosé wine – an ironic move given her past pronouncements on healthier living. This desperate grab for celebrity branding is failing, spectacularly.

Adding to the circus, Meghan’s continued “obsession” with Instagram and showing off her children – a move that has reportedly “upset Harry” – is seen as a desperate attempt to stay relevant. Angela Levin, in a prior segment, lambasted Meghan’s “desperate” need to be seen, calling it “almost like an illness.” She even shockingly suggested Meghan’s “twerking” and future antics might involve “take off her clothes altogether” to “make life hell” for the Royal Family.

The public perception of Meghan is plummeting. As Levin recounted her fishmonger’s scathing comment: “‘That woman, that woman, oh, why doesn’t he get rid of her?’” This is the raw, unfiltered voice of the British public – a stark contrast to the fawning press Meghan once commanded.

Meghan Markle’s carefully constructed “global empire” is imploding before our very eyes. As Kate embodies quiet strength and unwavering duty, Meghan’s desperate, self-serving ventures are met with ridicule and disdain. The balance of power has shifted, irrevocably. The public has chosen its Queen-in-waiting, and it’s not the Duchess of Montecito. The only question now is: how much further will Meghan fall? And will Harry, a broken man by all accounts, finally see the light? Only time will tell, but for now, the popcorn is out in force!